TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

JohnButlerTrain Archive

View 2 posts and 12 comments by JohnButlerTrain on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-2

There's a clear difference between insulting a person and threatening to kill/rape them.
/r/MensRights23/06/15 06:16 AM
0

That's one way of looking at the issue, definitely. I can also see it as discrimination designed to show people who are perceived as 'privileged' to understand what discrimination feels like. It's the same inspiration behind Jane Elliot's blue eyes brown eyes experiment. We can debate the relative effectiveness of each (I personally think Miss Elliot accomplishes her goal in a much more effective way), but if we look at the issue from this perspective, I think we can learn a lot more about 'Femi…
/r/MensRights04/12/14 08:50 PM
4

Is this kind of thing really pertinent to the discussion of men's rights? Why does this sub focus so much energy on pointing out the negative aspects of the feminist movement? There are negative parts of any movement, and sometimes those negative parts can take over the voice of the majority - though I think most people would agree that most people who identify as feminists do so in a positive way. Sure, we can look at things like this and say "oh what a bunch of phonies! They're not after equal…
/r/MensRights04/12/14 08:36 PM
2

For historical examples of women exercising 'female influence' I'd recommend looking at some Norse Sagas. Also, I can't find it anywhere but JSTOR, but you might want to read Regardless of Sex: Men, Women, and Power in Early Northern Europe as well -- the author's Carol Clover.
/r/MensRights20/06/14 09:14 AM
4

From what I've read, women's right to vote was originally given in western states as a way of attracting larger numbers of women to them. In addition, it was seen as a way of increasing the voting population in order to gain more reps in the house. Can't comment on it nationally very well, but I know that suffragette groups had an influence on the prohibition movement even before the right to vote, so maybe the flexing of this political power convinced officials to allow for women voters? It's a…
/r/MensRights04/06/14 09:37 PM
2

From what I've learned (albeit this is obviously biased by the people who taught me), science is not "objective" because too often it requires human interpretation of data in order to make any sensible conclusions out of it. It also is dependent on necessarily flawed human observations, methods, etc. Mathematics is the closest thing to a truly objective discipline I think. It could be totally objective, I haven't done enough reading into the possibility of subjectivity in math. That being said, …
/r/MensRights06/05/14 09:33 PM
1

Interesting because I noticed this at another point, when you see Timmy creating a photoshopped image of himself during the montage at the gym. It's interesting how this issue is brought up peripherally but not directly addressed. Why didn't we see the boys creating equally unattainable photos of themselves on the web in response to the girls doing the same? Do you think that the boys wouldn't have felt the need to 'compare' with the girls? I liked this episode a lot, but I also think it could'v…
/r/MensRights13/12/13 06:08 AM
3

Hmm... sounds a lot like they're saying "either you're male or female"... sounsd pretty misogynist of them to me
/r/MensRights06/12/13 03:39 PM
1

At least then I wouldn't have to spend time trying to get them to sleep with me
/r/MensRights10/09/13 07:05 PM
8

Jesus. It's shit like this that makes me wish I was gay.
/r/MensRights09/09/13 08:16 AM
5

The only reason a quote taken out of context would be unacceptable is if it is used in a way that the context would not allow for. If these quotes are being used in such a way, then this should be corrected. However if the context does not contradict the interpretation of the quote alone, there is no problem with using said quote without context. If your only argument against a quote is that it is not "in context" then you should not be opposing only "salacious" quotes, but any and all quotes th…
/r/MensRights18/02/13 09:57 PM
10

Those quotes gave quite a bit of context ; it's not as if they were just one liners that could be taken in many different ways. If you need more, you need to go find these articles for your self. Also the entire idea of a quote necessarily takes that specific phrase out of its context as a way to try to create an accurate portrayal of the article as a whole. So unless you can give examples of how these quotes are being misrepresented, you're point is invalid.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 09:00 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter