TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

JohnCh8V32 Archive

View 1 posts and 26 comments by JohnCh8V32 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Red Pill TheoryJohnCh8V32/r/TheRedPill15/10/15 04:39 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

In the past I've had to direct people to off-site PMing, but ensuring credentials never crossed paths with insecure channels has been a bit of a nightmare. There's this solution to that problem, in case anyone was wondering: Public Key Solution Alice puts the trinket in a box, locks it and sends it to Bob. Bob locks the box again with his lock and sends the box back. Alice removes her lock and sends it to Bob. Bob removes the final lock and takes the trinket. The puzzle's trick is double locking…
/r/TheRedPill13/06/17 10:44 AM
1

I should rephrase that to "an external indicator" rather than "the external indicator" since I don't mean "the [sole] external indicator". They can indeed have unhealthy mind or morals without it being immediately obvious that something is wrong with them from their appearance. You can draw the conclusion though, that people who lack either the means or the motivation to maintain their external appearance of health, are probably not in the peak of health. Extreme selfishness and a corresponding …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/17 06:46 PM
1

Fantastic! Reminds me (in a good way) of some asian folk story about a philosopher's mother moving house again and again just to find a good neighbourhood to influence her kid: Mencius's father died when he was very young. His mother Zhǎng (仉) raised her son alone. They were very poor. At first they lived by a cemetery, where the mother found her son imitating the paid mourners in funeral processions. Therefore, the mother decided to move. The next house was near a market in the town. There the …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/17 03:24 PM

If not directly, then indirectly through association. Preeeeety sure they have absolutely nothing to fear from the likes of me By association, for example, hard-working law-abiding members of X ethnic group or X religious group are not a cause for fear, but their associates, however distant, and however many degrees of separation there are, still have some association with them. In the case of body standards, even a weak example still has some mass, some attraction in general to the overall perc…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/17 02:42 PM

Unless you're using the term "beauty" to just refer to gender neutral hygiene? This is probably the crux of it. "Hygiene", "beauty", and "fitness" (of all sorts), are interrelated concepts. Hygiene is one of the essential means to achieve the appearance of outward physical health - the appearance of which we term "beauty" - and the external indicator of internal mental and moral health - which is still beauty in a sense. Health and fitness are almost interchangeable concepts.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/17 02:34 PM

Hm, I do agree with your reasoning. Thanks!
/r/MarriedRedPill31/03/17 03:00 PM

Guys don't want to fuck a "personality", but girls do which is why girl-porn primarily exists in the form of narrative. Do you mean "all guys are not turned on by personality and only are by looks, and all girls are not turned on by looks and only are by personality"? If not, what exactly do you mean? How would you test this or prove this?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/17 02:49 PM

Okay. Why?
/r/MarriedRedPill31/03/17 02:35 PM
2

Upon which premises do you base your argument?
/r/MarriedRedPill31/03/17 02:33 PM
2

Literalism
/r/MarriedRedPill31/03/17 02:33 PM

That is a good example! Someone literally taking "an object which is in motion will always stay in motion unless acted on by an external force" might not stop to think about what is meant by staying in motion or the behaviours of forces, in the same way that people might not stop to think what "A" and "L" are in AWALT. They might be led to believe in perpetual motion machines from a literalist interpretation of those rules.
/r/MarriedRedPill31/03/17 02:20 PM
3

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theodora_(6th_century) « My lords, the present occasion is too serious to allow me to follow the convention that a woman should not speak in a man’s council. Those whose interests are threatened by extreme danger should think only of the wisest course of action, not of conventions. In my opinion, flight is not the right course, even if it should bring us to safety. It is impossible for a person, having been born into this world, not to die; but for one who has reign…
/r/MarriedRedPill31/03/17 02:11 PM
3

AWALT is one of the core tenets of RP dogma - extrapolating the sex differences in psychology to extremes and with hyperbole, getting the message across that all women by virtue of being women and by definition of being women have fundamental differences in tendencies in their psychology, to men. Testosterone and social environment does cause some difference, sure. It is a pedagogical tool, a useful heuristic, a heavy hammer to crack the wool over the eyes of people and open their eyes to see th…
/r/MarriedRedPill31/03/17 01:34 PM
6

I would suggest that they are pressuring L and treating her as a child, speaking for her and on behalf of her, instead of respecting L's independent mind and ability to hold her boundaries. I would appeal to L's growth as a person (this would fit into your image as the adult and counsellor of the group) and suggest that her relationship with you is a natural progression while those around you are attempting to keep her young, vulnerable, and a victim instead of one with initiative. Because isn't…
/r/askTRP08/03/17 11:29 AM
1

Would I be correct in assuming that he does not seem to be particularly impulsive or 'hot-blooded'? Loosely related to this: does he have much of a history in things which require fast reflexes such as competitive or combat sports and certain real-time video games, and of quick problem-solving? It trains certain areas of the brain to work in certain ways. So does critical thinking and well-reasoned debate. Those work well to converting sheep into dogs and wolves.
/r/askTRP20/12/16 08:39 AM
1

Another idea could be CAPTCHA-type tests for the first hundred posts each new account makes, with the CAPTCHA material being questions directly drawn from the sidebar material.
/r/TheRedPill25/04/16 09:11 AM
2

Hi, random redditor here. Hopefully my perspective of things might help. There is a lot of duality in the way you can see things. Because life is finite, you can see it as a reason to be serious, but you can also see it as a reason not to be serious. I let myself pick and choose which way to see it at different times. It isn't just a superficial choice, because it has real consequences. About depression, anxiety, anger - if you can self-reflect about any of your underlying reasons prompting it, …
/r/askTRP06/01/16 04:51 AM
5

Say she's spending too much time online obsessively clicking and snooping around peoples' usernames. Draw the discussion into that frame. Whether or not the username history she found was yours is irrelevant - if she says otherwise, you can derail that along the lines of "It's not relevant to anyone here what colour underwear you're wearing, or how many people you've slept with, and if you told them, they wouldn't care anyway".
/r/askTRP06/01/16 04:20 AM
1

A short holiday to a country where prostitution is legal and is run safely by professionals, perhaps? A bit expensive for just practical sex ed, but the other experiences that you pick up on the holiday make for good conversation topics. Talk to everyone.
/r/askTRP02/01/16 04:23 AM
6

If anyone attempts a TRP inquisition against anybody, here's a train of thought which might be useful. Opponent's overall strategy: Step 1: the opponent will first try to solidify you into 'being' 'a' RP. In the same way as someone would try to frame someone 'as' a Communist or an unorthodox heretic (!!) by picking out certain traits in isolation such as being charitable or giving evidence of the earth revolving around the sun, the opponent will pick traits and reason from them that you 'are' so…
/r/TheRedPill13/12/15 01:59 PM
3

From my observations this is a typical subreddit, allowing any post which is vaguely on topic. The signal to noise ratio is high. There is no cohesive narrative. The TRP sub on the other hand has more disciplined moderation of posts, towards a well-argued theoretical understanding of reality. The arguments are made, and they are followed with explanations and analysis. Right or wrong, they waste no time in laying their reasoning on the table to criticise and to learn from.
/r/MGTOW04/12/15 04:08 PM
2

Go ahead, look it up en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frankfurt_School#Cultural_Marxism_conspiracy_theory?
/r/TheRedPill12/11/15 11:43 AM
9

It was interesting to note another comparison to children, in a comment regarding one woman's outburst about an absence of Yale Halloween costume regulations: "It's like they see the university as a patriarchal figure that must shelter and coddle them and sooth their upset via overbearing restrictions imposed upon the children (students). They aren't adults; they have no agency to cope with even seeing a costume they don't like on their own, they're children who want to be in a patriarchy manage…
/r/TheRedPill08/11/15 12:07 PM
1

False advertising! This reminds me of that hoax story about some asian husband sueing his wife for giving birth to ugly kids, after he found out that she had concealed the fact that she had had cosmetic surgery.
/r/TheRedPill10/04/14 02:02 PM
2

That's actually one of the second things I try in a changing room.
/r/TheRedPill08/04/14 05:38 PM
1

Fuck yeah
/r/TheRedPill08/04/14 04:50 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter