JohnSudo Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
30459	How to get banned from r/Feminism	Feminism	JohnSudo	/r/MensRights	18/12/16 05:16 PM
13	Debunking Non-Binary Genders		JohnSudo	/r/MensRights	14/11/16 11:36 AM

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	Slap on the wrist for killing own child. Wow, just wow. Legally, in the United States, it works like this: You don't have the right to kill the fetus. You have the right to remove the fetus, and the unfortunate fact that it's unable to sustain itself afterward is a byproduct. Not accurate. Under the law a baby has no rights as it not considered a life until the 2nd-3rd trimester. A person's right to bodily autonomy does not make it legal to kill incidental offenders of said autonomy. The only reason abortion is legal is because the people like yourse…	/r/MensRights	25/03/17 10:16 AM
2	Slap on the wrist for killing own child. Wow, just wow. The fact you expect such crude and pathetic insults to have any beneficial outcome shows how limited in capacity your thought process truly is. You only serve to undermine any chance you had of you opinions to be taken seriously.	/r/MensRights	25/03/17 09:18 AM
3	Slap on the wrist for killing own child. Wow, just wow. I think someone needs a hug.... It's ok, you are a special and unique individual .	/r/MensRights	25/03/17 01:01 AM
2	Slap on the wrist for killing own child. Wow, just wow. No brain activity, no heartbeat and no motor functions take place until that time. Braindead comment about fetal development. You are either willfully ignorant or lying. Heartbeat and motor functions begin well before the third trimester. Heart beat and movement can be seen in the late first trimester, and brain activity becomes apparent in the second trimester. If your litmus test for life was based on the same criteria you attempted to use in your diatribe against the use of abortion statistic…	/r/MensRights	24/03/17 11:54 PM
-1	Top most upvoted post in r/feminism subreddit openly incites to physical violence using metal weapons against anyone making a "sexist" comment. This is the true face of feminism Free speech. That is no "call to violence". Snowflakes of all stripes use the same stupid logic to try and shut down viewpoints they don't like. Be better than that.	/r/MensRights	05/03/17 06:22 PM
1	How to get banned from r/Feminism A) You're saying the only law that matters is the stuff you could go to jail for? Remember, I said the legal definition of assault, not that it constitutes a criminal offense in all circumstances. Your disregard for tort law and state law sounds like really lopsided thinking. I disregard Tort law in this discussion because such Civil Liability laws are not written with the protection of society in mind, but for the restitution of defined illegal acts. Criminal Law will put me in prison for viola…	/r/MensRights	30/12/16 12:19 PM
1	How to get banned from r/Feminism Intentionally putting another person in reasonable apprehension of an imminent harmful or offensive contact. No intent to cause physical injury needs to exist, and no physical injury needs to result. So defined in tort law and the criminal statutes of some states. My definition was the default criminal definition of Assault in the United States. Yours was for Civil Liability and some States. Attempting to use a definition such as the one you provided that is only irregularly applied to criminal …	/r/MensRights	29/12/16 10:44 PM
4	How to get banned from r/Feminism I don’t agree that we strive to make people feel safe. We strive to ensure peoples safety, and as a consequence, you generally feel safe. So while the feeling of safety may be derived from being safe, being unsafe does not derive from feeling unsafe. As such, society should be primarily concerned with ensuring the safety of its citizens, not their feeling of safety.	/r/MensRights	19/12/16 12:04 PM
3	How to get banned from r/Feminism You’re absolutely right, my bad on that front.	/r/MensRights	19/12/16 11:46 AM
2	How to get banned from r/Feminism Hmm, no I had never heard of it. Thank you. Curious though, while you may have heard of it, did you take the time to read your own link? The fourth is freedom from fear—which, translated into world terms, means a world-wide reduction of armaments to such a point and in such a thorough fashion that no nation will be in a position to commit an act of physical aggression against any neighbor—anywhere in the world. Context, context, context.	/r/MensRights	19/12/16 04:20 AM
3	How to get banned from r/Feminism Well, as they don't bother to provide an explanation, and I don't feel the need to beg one off them, we will just have to make some assumptions. Seeing as I had a grand total of four comments in that sub, neither of the other two were any more offensive than the one above nor garnered the amount of down votes. So I found it logical to assume those last comments were the proverbial "straw" in thier eyes. Or it was the mere fact that I participated in r/MensRights, which is even more of a reason t…	/r/MensRights	19/12/16 04:11 AM
21	How to get banned from r/Feminism Well now, how about we use the full definition, instead of your shortened, more convenient feint. An attempt with force or violence to do a corporal injury to another; may consist of any act tending to such corporal injury, accompanied with such circumstances as denotes at the time an intention, coupled with present ability, of using actual violence against the person Source - https://www.justice.gov/usam/criminal-resource-manual-1610-assault-18-usc-351e Fortunately for you, this sub does not us…	/r/MensRights	18/12/16 10:55 PM
11	How to get banned from r/Feminism I think you may be missing the context a bit, as I specifically avoided linking to the post in question. While I think such notions should be confronted, having a flood of MR comments would only further convince them of the righteousness of thier victim narrative. Below you will find an archive of the post that might help with the context of my comments. http://archive.is/ctsQA	/r/MensRights	18/12/16 09:25 PM
8	How to get banned from r/Feminism Nope. Frustrated sure. Angry no. And lastly checked Reddit has nothing to do with public policy....	/r/MensRights	18/12/16 09:20 PM
11	How to get banned from r/Feminism No, the standard is not based on how safe you feel, but how safe you actually are. You may feel unsafe, and the situation may reflect that. Or you may feel unsafe and the situation does not an reflect an actual threat to your safety. The key point is not your feelings, but the reality of the situation.	/r/MensRights	18/12/16 08:32 PM
5	How to get banned from r/Feminism No hurt feelings here. :) Just wanted to further shine light on the hypocrisy of the sub, and by some extent, feminism/sjw's in general.	/r/MensRights	18/12/16 08:07 PM
14	How to get banned from r/Feminism How do you objectively determine if you are safe? Are you safe right now from deadly airborne pathogens? Are you 100% certain you will not be struck by a rogue meteor in the next hour? From my post above. So if you do not feel safe regardless of being realistically safe, that is your issue. I never argued that you could be objectively 100% certain of your safety, only realistically so. The threat of a rogue meteor with a personal blood feud is quite unrealistic, so I have no right to expect prot…	/r/MensRights	18/12/16 08:01 PM
21	How to get banned from r/Feminism So you need to feel safe to pursue happiness? While feeling safe is good, being safe is really the only objective goal we can strive for in society as a whole. Individual mental states can only reliably be controlled by the individual. So if you do not feel safe regardless of being realistically safe, that is your issue. If it presents a barrier to your ability to pursue happiness, that's your problem, not society's.	/r/MensRights	18/12/16 07:23 PM
3	However small this is, it's still unnecessary discrimination. You come across as condescending, so whether or not your points make sense, people are less likely to be swayed by them. Hmm, you have a point here. This medium does not lend itself well to easy transmission of tone and emphasis you get from verbal communication. I was going for more no-nonsense straight talk, but I can see where that could be misconstrued. Except for that last bit about life lessons, that was all intentional snark/sarcasm, as I was getting exasperated with the entitlement narra…	/r/MensRights	13/12/16 12:32 AM
4	However small this is, it's still unnecessary discrimination. You are free (at least in the grand ol'USA) to express yourself in anyway you see fit. You do not have the right to have said expression validated, appreciated or curried too. Only two replies up.... You are setting up a false dichotomy here. Your options are not only Conformity or Starvation. You are free to make any choice you want for your life, but you are not owed a reward, or even tolerance for those choices. Life is not fair, it can and does suck, make of it what you will. There are no pa…	/r/MensRights	12/12/16 06:41 PM
5	However small this is, it's still unnecessary discrimination. No, you are not owed a job just because you exist. You are owed nothing but the opportunity to continue to exist. What you do with that opportunity is up to you. While Canada is running headlong into the arms of socialism, your southern neighbors have not yet given into the siren song of Socialism, with its honeyed words of "fairness" and "social-justice". Socialism only ever exists at gunpoint.	/r/MensRights	12/12/16 06:05 PM
2	However small this is, it's still unnecessary discrimination. Employment is not a right, it is a privilege. When you accept a position, you accept the terms and conditions as laid out by the employer, or not.	/r/MensRights	12/12/16 05:31 PM
2	However small this is, it's still unnecessary discrimination. Employment is not a right, it is a privilege. When you accept a position, you accept the terms and conditions as laid out by the employer, or not. Business have the right to define the conditions for your employment, within certain basic health and legal guidelines. If societal norms lean towards acceptance of short-haired men, and your business relies on catering towards those customers, requiring your male employees to have short hair is not unreasonable. Requiring business to cater to every e…	/r/MensRights	12/12/16 05:25 PM
2	However small this is, it's still unnecessary discrimination. Men's dress codes are a men's issue as much as women's dress codes are a women's issue. It's tiny and almost utterly irrelevant... I'd hazard to even put this in the realm of "men's/women's issues". Painting minor annoyances as "issues", is the first step along the slippery slope of outrage culture that fuels the SJW grievance train. If we want this crazy ride to ever stop, we need to stem it at the source.	/r/MensRights	12/12/16 04:22 PM
10	However small this is, it's still unnecessary discrimination. It is a private company, they have the right to provide dress expectations to anyone who voluntarily accepts employment by them. This is not a policy denying employment based on your sex, this is a dress policy outlining acceptable dress for each sex. You are free to dislike their dress policy, and subsequently refuse to be employed by them, but labeling it "sexual discrimination" is silly. tldr/sjwtrigger:Hooters *Edited for spelling... and hooters :)	/r/MensRights	12/12/16 11:42 AM
27	However small this is, it's still unnecessary discrimination. Ugh, do we really need to be nitpicking company dress codes?? They have a right to define the standard of dress for thier employees. If you don't agree, don't work there. We do not need to go down the SJW micro-discrimination rabbit hole.	/r/MensRights	12/12/16 02:25 AM
3	Men who were wrongly convicted seek to garnish the wages of the sheriff's deputies who helped put them behind bars Seriously what happened to her?! She was not sent to jail? I cannot believe this, omg its so tragic, how on earth can someone like that be allowed to work in such a place or walk free? She died last year. http://okcfox.com/archive/former-forensic-scientist-accused-of-forging-evidence-in-hundreds-of-cases-dies Unfortunately, for the falsely accused, she has escaped any Earthly justice.	/r/MensRights	18/11/16 06:02 PM
2	Debunking Non-Binary Genders But if i feel like the basic genders dont represent my thoughts accuratly incan categorize myself in a more fitting way. And therein lies the main issue the article was attempting to point out I think. For you to feel the need to identify other than the base binary, you have to define the base binary. Can you succinctly define male/masculine and female/feminine for me? Will I identify with your definition? Will anyone else? Ask 100 people to do the same and you will not find a singular definitio…	/r/MensRights	14/11/16 07:17 PM
1	Debunking Non-Binary Genders I'm not sure what your definition of gender would be then. Are you making the argument that gender is not tied to sex? If that's so I'd be interested to know how you define it (within the frame of your argument).	/r/MensRights	14/11/16 05:50 PM
3	Debunking Non-Binary Genders and so long as their is no legal bias, then their should not be a problem in allowing themselves to identify however they want. I wholeheartedly agree with you. Belief is not reality. I could believe that I am the second coming of Christ, but I have no right to expect you to treat me like it.	/r/MensRights	14/11/16 05:15 PM
4	Debunking Non-Binary Genders I don't see that as an error. Gender is a synonym for Sex. Attributes are assigned to a gender/sex based on societal expectations, but failing to match an attribute does not mean you are not that gender/sex. Being Male/Female doesn't require compliance with a specific attribute or even whole sets of attributes. If I were to describe an apple to you as "A red spherical fruit that grows on trees and has a sweet taste." I would be correct, at least for a subset of apples, and in my town we may only…	/r/MensRights	14/11/16 04:58 PM
3	Debunking Non-Binary Genders I disagree as well. If you read the article, you will have noted the main assertion the author makes is that the entirety of non-binary ideology is built upon a series of straw-men assumptions, ascribing attributes to a specific sex/gender and using those straw-men as proof that gender is non-binary. Non-Binary ideology: "Male/Female = X, I != X, thus I am not Male/Female" The same type of process is used by Feminism to marginalize and denigrate Men. Feminist Ideology: "Male = X, X = Misogynist,…	/r/MensRights	14/11/16 03:02 PM
3	Debunking Non-Binary Genders Looking for thoughts on the authors debunking of non-binary gender assertions. I happen to agree with them, but would appreciate further discussion.	/r/MensRights	14/11/16 11:36 AM
1	"Here’s what we learn from The Red Pill: the feminists have demonized men and feminism has succeeded as a female supremacy movement. The Feminist Cult of Victimhood has enslaved us all..." Review: The Red Pill The alternative is stoicism which isn't working out for us that much so we should probably try something else... So our best option, outside of shutting up and taking it, is to play the victim card for cultural pity points? It's the audience who chooses the game not your opponent. There is no audience in life, you either participate or forfeit.	/r/MensRights	05/11/16 01:09 AM
1	"Here’s what we learn from The Red Pill: the feminists have demonized men and feminism has succeeded as a female supremacy movement. The Feminist Cult of Victimhood has enslaved us all..." Review: The Red Pill If we live in a culture of victimhood that is the correct and only sensible path to redress grievances This just in... Two wrongs DO indeed make a right. /s You can't win at blackjack by playing poker - yesterday the game was poker today it's black jack so play black jack. Why let your opponent choose the game? *Edited to make obvious sarcasm obvious	/r/MensRights	04/11/16 10:05 PM
1	"Here’s what we learn from The Red Pill: the feminists have demonized men and feminism has succeeded as a female supremacy movement. The Feminist Cult of Victimhood has enslaved us all..." Review: The Red Pill Identifying victims of injustice can be the catalyst for true change, but relying on political capital garnered from your victim status to make any real societal change will only lead to the need for more victims. That is the rabbit hole that the feminist movement has gone down. I see no need to follow.	/r/MensRights	04/11/16 07:52 PM
1	"Here’s what we learn from The Red Pill: the feminists have demonized men and feminism has succeeded as a female supremacy movement. The Feminist Cult of Victimhood has enslaved us all..." Review: The Red Pill I'm not sure how you can point out a systematic inequity without bringing up "X has it worse than Y". I agree. Using comparative analysis to highlight an issue is fine. I am talking about what happens next. For Example: How would you respond, if when discussing gender issues with someone and you state that "Men suffer inequality in regards to X" then use statistics to show that X affects more Men than Women, then your detractor counters by pointing out "But Women suffer Y more then Men do"? Do y…	/r/MensRights	04/11/16 06:53 PM
2	"Here’s what we learn from The Red Pill: the feminists have demonized men and feminism has succeeded as a female supremacy movement. The Feminist Cult of Victimhood has enslaved us all..." Review: The Red Pill There is a difference between victimhood narratives and force protection. They can resemble each other at the superficial level, but they are in fact very different. I agree that victimhood narrative can often be difficult to spot at a surface level, which is exactly why we should be vigilant in its detection and denouncement. I don't believe that feminism went from suffrage to man-spreading by deliberate design. We need to be careful that as the tide begins to turn, we don't allow our victories…	/r/MensRights	04/11/16 06:03 PM
1	"Here’s what we learn from The Red Pill: the feminists have demonized men and feminism has succeeded as a female supremacy movement. The Feminist Cult of Victimhood has enslaved us all..." Review: The Red Pill I have no issues with women speaking about Mens Rights. Men are routinely ignored when we attempt to make our voices heard, and it is shameful that protestors will use that to their advantage to shut down a viewpoint they fear. The point I was trying to illustrate is that I often see the discussions/arguments/assertions devolve into oppression one-up-manship, where each side is trying to prove how much worse they have it than the other. Those tactics are widely used by the feminist/SJW camp, and…	/r/MensRights	04/11/16 03:42 PM
3	"Here’s what we learn from The Red Pill: the feminists have demonized men and feminism has succeeded as a female supremacy movement. The Feminist Cult of Victimhood has enslaved us all..." Review: The Red Pill I have to disagree with your characterization of the article as "Bullshit". While you may not be donning the armor of a woman's skirt, it does not mean it is not happening. I don't think I am the only one to have seen a rise in some men flying the MRM flag at the "Oppression Olympics". When the primary arguments move from "My Rights have been violated/ignored" to "My rights are being violated MORE than YOURS!!!11!", we move into the realm of victimhood. And as the feminist movement has shown, no…	/r/MensRights	04/11/16 01:00 PM
10	"Here’s what we learn from The Red Pill: the feminists have demonized men and feminism has succeeded as a female supremacy movement. The Feminist Cult of Victimhood has enslaved us all..." Review: The Red Pill I think the author has a point here. How far down the rabbit-hole of victimhood will the MRM go before we become that which we rail against? Shining a light on injustice and hypocrisy is not only good, but a responsibility of any decent person. But using such injustices as a cloak for personal gain or to excuse oneself of personal responsibility for their actions is reprehensible.	/r/MensRights	04/11/16 10:46 AM
1	Advice For Younger Brother, Unintended Pregnancy I would have to agree that there is little likelihood of either of us changing the others mind here to day, so in regards to the abortion/adoption subject, I will not delve any further. I do though have to clarify that your characterization of me supporting "no choice", as being quite off base, though I expect it was not intentional. I am a very staunch proponent of choice, but I am also an equal proponent of people owning those choices and the results of said choices. In essence: The requiremen…	/r/MensRights	26/10/16 02:54 PM
1	Advice For Younger Brother, Unintended Pregnancy First off, this line of dialogue is a bit outside of the scope of the OP's post, so hopefully we can keep this brief and not derail the original topic. To answer your question in one word: Yes In two words: Mostly Yes In detail: I am not a supporter of abortion outside of strict exceptions for the health of the mother, and rape. Even in the instance of rape I am strongly against that it being a primary option. I believe adoption is an option only in the event the parent's (note the plural) are I…	/r/MensRights	26/10/16 01:20 PM
1	This sub confuses me. There is no "true" feminism. The moment you start speaking about "true" anything you have either just invalidated your argument, or crippled the chances of getting a satisfactory answer to your question. Though in my experience I have seen several posts I would consider to be mired in a narrative of hate, though they rarely make it very far before having their nature revealed. Personally I don’t see a issue with hate. People should hate evil and immorality, and when it rears its ugly head you sh…	/r/MensRights	26/10/16 10:26 AM
1	Advice For Younger Brother, Unintended Pregnancy I never made claims to the impossibility of failure. Men try and fail, then they get back up and try again. If they cant get up, others lend them a hand to get back on their feet. Life can and does suck, and you will fail. Failure as a consequence need not preclude the action. I never suggested he had any true control of the situation as a whole. I stated he should take control of HIS part of the situation, as his actions are the only thing he has any real control of, and should be the only acti…	/r/MensRights	26/10/16 10:00 AM
1	Advice For Younger Brother, Unintended Pregnancy I am being entirely realistic about the outlook of the choices he made. Regardless of the legal obligations he has, of which he has minimal true control over, he is likely going to be a Father for the rest of his life. His control is limited primarily to his own actions. He has no control over the Mothers actions, and the legal system will work as it normally does. I stated that common sense dictates he see to his own health and happiness, therein lies the basic legal guidance to ensure everythi…	/r/MensRights	26/10/16 09:40 AM
-1	Advice For Younger Brother, Unintended Pregnancy How about less concern for "liabilities" and more regard for responsibilities. While the evidence suggests he is still lacking in that department, he should not be looking cover his ass, but be encouraged to take control of his part in this situation. He should not be lead to look for a way out but what the way forward. He will likely be a father in the coming months, and we all know that is not something he has a true choice in at this point. The only real choice he has is what kind of father h…	/r/MensRights	26/10/16 01:15 AM
1	Alimony-Rape: Cancer Center Founder’s Wife Demands $400k a Month in Divorce Case Perfect example of the travesty that is marriage in America today. It's unfortunate that such a story is being delivered so crudely. It will be unlikely to resonate with many outside of the RedPill/MGTOW echo chambers.	/r/MensRights	25/10/16 04:41 PM