TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

JohnjSmithsJnr Archive

View 1 posts and 189 comments by JohnjSmithsJnr on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
97

Legal RightsJohnjSmithsJnr/r/MensRights03/05/18 11:49 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

There's not that many bots but I've found that about half are just on tinder for the ego boost and won't bother responding once. Of the other 50% only half of them will engage you in conversation beyond a few messages.
/r/MensRights28/05/20 12:29 AM
9

Talk to a lawyer now. If you don't you're a fucking idiot. It's important that you get verified records of those texts from the cell phone company now using a subpoena as cell phone companies don't always keep them forever. Don't be an idiot
/r/MensRights12/07/19 04:09 AM
1

I'm not really sure why everyone here is saying she should have been charged. Having a law against "Controlling behavior" is absolutely ridiculous and so arbitrary and subject to abuse it should scare everyone on here who lives in the UK. Basically you don't even have to do anything that's actually illegal, like assaulting someone, to be charged with a crime
/r/MensRights28/06/19 01:09 AM
1

My point is it was idiotic for anyone to vote for him
/r/MensRights05/06/19 01:46 AM
-1

You're a fucking idiot for voting for him in the first place. He has accomplished absolutely NOTHING impressive in his life, he is not at all impressive in any way in his own right. The only reason he was even able to get into politics in the first place, let alone be leader of the party and become prime minister is because his daddy was famous. Watching him "debate" is mind numbing, when the whole controversy surrounding corruption emerged all he did when question on it was repeat that they "ca…
/r/MensRights05/06/19 01:38 AM
4

Prenups are never, ever bulletproof, if the lawyer is telling him that they are then he should get better legal advice. There are a few ways to make them stronger though. Make them as "fair" as possible, basically make it so that the other partner will still be provided for. Make sure your partner receives independent legal counsel regarding it, if the judge finds that they didn't understand what they were signing then that creates grounds to throw it out.
/r/MensRights29/04/19 02:24 AM
6

You should get a barrister, they're held in far, far higher esteem by the courts than normal solicitors are and aren't afraid of getting their feet wet
/r/MensRights28/03/19 09:52 AM
2

I wonder what would happen if I said murder was black mans culture
/r/MensRights27/03/19 11:35 PM
11

Yeah, it sounds a lot like she was trying to bait him into rough sex. Women having rape fantasies is actually a rather common occurrence, there's even a subreddit where lots of them with the fetish talk about "baiting" by doing stuff like that. OP dodged a massive bullet
/r/MensRights24/02/19 10:58 AM
0

She was 12.... I really doubt he couldn't tell she was under 18
/r/MensRights21/02/19 01:55 AM
2

Any therapist who gets in an argument with their patient is a horrible therapist
/r/MensRights19/02/19 01:19 AM
6

I'm curious, what do you define an expert vs a lay person to be? Overall nice work, it's well written, articulate, easy to understand and interesting
/r/MensRights08/02/19 08:58 AM
135

Now I will say one thing: based on my sister's account, this guy really was acting like a complete lout. He's six foot four, my sister is about five foot three. He even tried to pull down the zipper on her dress, but stopped as soon as she said "fuck off." But "fuck off" is itself an example of real "female empowerment", because she told him to fuck off rather than running, crying to HR, like a child. To be honest he should be fired for that
/r/MensRights22/01/19 08:43 AM
0

That's pretty fucking generous
/r/MensRights01/01/19 03:00 AM
7

She's basically a female incel
/r/MensRights01/01/19 03:00 AM
19

A brief run down for anyone who can't be bothered reading it: The author used a ridiculously extreme definition of "internal consistency" relating to consistency in male and female brains and as such wasn't able to find differences. The paper refuting the individual study was however able to correctly guess the gender 69-77% of the time based entirely upon the results in the original study. This thoroughly debunks that the assertion that there's no difference whatsoever and that they can't be ca…
/r/MensRights09/12/18 08:35 AM
4

She can't remember who's party or where it was either She told the therapist it was 4 people but is now saying it was 2 people
/r/MensRights26/09/18 11:25 PM
8

I don't like that they need permission but I feel that it's fair for the spouse to at least be notified
/r/MensRights25/09/18 02:29 PM
1

after he claimed the false allegations cost him a sparkling military career The wording of the article is so dishonest, it was proven in court that they were made up. And if anything the article is sympathetic to her
/r/MensRights25/09/18 02:26 PM
5

it's actually the channel that deletes comments and disables comments on videos. I doubt it was youtube
/r/MensRights11/09/18 11:56 PM
5

He admitted it in the post game interview, it's mentioned in a few articles (the unbiased ones)
/r/MensRights09/09/18 08:43 PM
17

I love it how most media outlets reported her breaking her racquet as just a "racquet violation". Additionally most sports will fine and suspend you for doing something like that, if anything it was too lenient. Her coach even admitted that he was coaching her, regardless of whether she was listening to it or not it's fair that she got the penalty, coaches are professionals and have to conduct themselves professionally within the rules of the game. The racquet smashing was bad sportsmanship, pla…
/r/MensRights09/09/18 11:34 AM
3

It was a $265,000 mistake. Pretty sure the girlfriend doing that wasn't a "mistake", it's disgusting how there's virtually no criticism to be found of her anywhere in the article. CNN is a fantastic news outlet
/r/MensRights07/09/18 10:58 PM
5

1 year for trying to ruin someones life....
/r/MensRights24/08/18 12:16 AM
1

It's relevant in any conversation about IQ, since IQ is literally a distribution
/r/MensRights17/08/18 10:40 AM
1

The average might be the same but theres a difference in the standard deviation between men and womens IQ results. Basically men have a higher standard deviation which means it's more spread out, there are more really dumb men but also more really smart men, while women are more grouped around the average
/r/MensRights17/08/18 12:28 AM
1

You’re*
/r/MensRights10/08/18 05:31 AM
2

For the privilege? It's a right until they are adults and able to provide for themselves.
/r/MensRights09/08/18 08:23 AM
7

One recent analysis, for example, found that boys ages 15 to 19 do about half an hour of housework a day, and girls about 45 minutes. I call bullshit. I'm young and almost noone I know has ever really done any housework, let alone 30-45 minutes a day. It's fairly obvious that whatever sampling technique they're using results in a biased sample
/r/MensRights09/08/18 04:32 AM
1

I'm pretty fucking sure that if you have kids you're signing up for allowing them to live in your house......
/r/MensRights09/08/18 04:31 AM
128

They use two different people in a way to twist it and suit their own narrative. It doesn't say "And x person also experience...." It just continues and if you don't read it carefully you wouldn't realise that it had started talking about another person. It also suffers from a near complete lack of context
/r/MensRights09/08/18 04:28 AM
13

Ever notice how all feminists apparently "know" people who have been "raped"? I mean I know plenty of people but afaik none of them have been raped, it's not exactly something that comes up in casual conversation either
/r/MensRights06/08/18 01:26 AM
1

When war is on. Not now
/r/MensRights05/08/18 08:05 AM
1

Can people stop using combat deaths as an argument. Unless you are forcefully conscripted you go into combat knowing what might happen, it's a choice
/r/MensRights05/08/18 02:14 AM
1

This is down to men's lack of degrees and high incomes, a US study claims Umm last time I checked men make more and occupy more high level positions than women do
/r/MensRights30/07/18 01:53 PM
6

Yes
/r/MensRights29/07/18 01:28 AM
9

She made alienating false accusations, without any connection with reality, with which she convinced her family and friends that I am some sort of monster This is a huge part of current culture I absolutely hate. The nanosecond "rape", or "abuse" is mentioned all objective thought is thrown out the window and the accused is shunned from everything.
/r/MensRights26/07/18 02:30 PM
2

Yep, I was banned from askfeminists and feminism with the moderator just telling me I was in breach of the rules. They however absolutely refused to tell me what rule I was in breach of and which if my comments it was
/r/MensRights21/07/18 07:15 AM
9

Law and order SVU has so many examples of prosecutor misconduct it's ridiculous. I remember one episode where they got the coroner to lie of the stand and give a false statement surrounding the reliability of partial DNA profiles when she had explicitly made them aware of how unreliable they are. She was then caught out for her bs having written an article on their unreliability a few years earlier. It is of course just a TV show but it's ridiculous when they do stuff like that and they're made …
/r/MensRights20/07/18 10:39 AM
11

Amazing how they act as if the husband was the one who started everything when the video clearly shows the wife threw the first punch
/r/MensRights20/07/18 10:34 AM
466

It isn't even usually men, it's almost always women judging those pageants
/r/MensRights18/07/18 02:06 PM
12

He must be fucking brain dead if he didn't realise you were being sarcastic
/r/MensRights17/07/18 01:21 AM
0

Who gives a fuck? How is this an area where men have less rights or are discriminated against.
/r/MensRights15/07/18 01:15 AM
1

The science behind the male birth control pill has actually been around for a really long time. The reason it wasn't produced earlier however is that the pharmaceutical companies determined that there isn't really a market for it. I mean if you're a woman and you're going to have a one night stand with some random dude you wouldn't necessarily trust them if they tell you they're on the pill.
/r/MensRights12/07/18 03:31 AM
2

It's not ignorant at all. And yes teens can be manipulative, but not nearly on this level. For a bunch of teens to get together and decide to go to a pool and accuse a completely random stranger of sexual assault isn't just being "manipulative", that level of perversion isn't even typical of the worst of the worst sociopaths and psychopaths. It's extremely unlikely. Also even if they were that perverted it would be extremely unlikely that such people would then get their story wrong. If you seri…
/r/MensRights08/07/18 02:12 PM
2

It's not even that ridiculous, it's to be expected. Please do a simple 10 minutes worth of googling and research about the unreliability of eyewitness testimony before replying. As I said, it's well documented and well known.
/r/MensRights08/07/18 11:27 AM
3

So you're saying that a group of 14 year old girls with a perverted sense of humour decided to come together and maliciously lie and accuse a completely random stranger that they had never met of sexual assault, but they were unable to get their stories straight? Do you realise how ridiculous that is. Memory is not like a video tape, memory is extremely fallible, a lot of the details you "remember" are largely incorrect. If you're expecting a group of 14 year olds to remember specific details ab…
/r/MensRights08/07/18 11:15 AM
1

You pull rank and say my fallacies are constant but don't actually provide any explanation at all for how memory works or how I am wrong. And I don't see how you being a medical professional is at all relevant, unless you're a neuroscientist or something similar you're not in a particularly authoritative or special position to comment on it. The unreliability of eyewitnesses is very well documented and known and you're insisting that instead of these kids just being unreliable eyewitnesses they'…
/r/MensRights08/07/18 05:36 AM
-5

You have literally zero knowledge or understanding of how memory works, stop commenting on it. Memory doens't become "fuzzy", memory is only fuzzy if you were drunk or something similar to that. Memory is not like a video taped recording of what happened, a lot of what we "remember", such as small details, we don't actually remember, they're fake or made-up memories. We don't remember everything so our brains fill in (a lot of) details, eg. the colour of his goggles. The reason people have repor…
/r/MensRights08/07/18 05:05 AM
-1

As another commenter pointed out, eye witness testimony is often unreliable. The very fact that they aren't saying the exact same thing shows that this wasn't a malicious effort on the part of the victims to ruin the life of a random man. If you want to comment on such criminal cases you should really do some research because you're extremely uninformed in regards to the nature of memory and other such things. I was going to give props to Canada for finally getting one right, but what happened h…
/r/MensRights08/07/18 04:51 AM
-4

They're teenage girls, this isn't a false accusation, it's fairly normal and natural for them to discuss what happened afterwards. That being said though the judge made the correct ruling on that case, it is contaminated evidence. Your example of the detective story is important because eye witness testimony is almost never 100% accurate. Memory is not infallible and unlike popular opinion it is not like a video tape, asking small things such as what colour the goggles months after the incident …
/r/MensRights08/07/18 04:46 AM
5

This isn't even a false accusation. This is just proof that eyewitness testimony is often unreliable
/r/MensRights08/07/18 04:41 AM
7

The onus should be on the alleged victim to say and make it clear that they're not consenting. Having a new law that means all partners must say "yes" would make all sex in which 2 partners don't specifically ask each other "do you want to have sex?" and then each say "yes" rape. I mean how many people actually ask that question when they're about to have sex?
/r/MensRights08/07/18 04:33 AM
1

It's more just if you're a public figure somewhere tbh
/r/MensRights07/07/18 06:24 AM
3

Despite the severity of her attack, Lorien Norman, now 28, walked free from a South Australian court with only a good behavior bond and $500 fine.
/r/MensRights03/07/18 05:58 AM
3

"Undateability of women to blame for women freezing eggs" I really don't know how this has anything to do with men, I'm not going to commit to a relationship with someone I probably won't want to be in a relationship with in a couple years.
/r/MensRights03/07/18 03:46 AM
3

That's just a toxic relationship and the only thing you can really say about it is that he should leave her.
/r/MensRights01/07/18 01:49 PM
6

She accused him of anally raping her, anal rape / penetration isn't something that you can just walk away from normally unless you've used lots of lube and have done it before. There's no way that such trauma wouldn't have shown up in a rape kit
/r/MensRights01/07/18 01:40 PM
1

And all you're doing is virtue signalling, OP shouldn't put his career on the line just because YOU think it's the "right" thing to do Virtue signalling with no actual thought for real life practicality or repercussions is stupid and useless.
/r/MensRights25/06/18 11:54 AM
4

It took 12 years of my life away Thanks for proving my point
/r/MensRights25/06/18 09:39 AM
7

It doesn't matter... this is about what's right.. That's all nice and good for you to say sitting on your couch at home but for OP it has real life repercussions. and if his career is negatively impacted it's not the right company to work for. The consequences of it could reach past just that job, people in the same industry talk
/r/MensRights25/06/18 06:07 AM
7

OP really shouldn't do this. While it would be nice if this would work the reality is that it likely wouldn't and reporting it could very well negatively impact OPs career
/r/MensRights25/06/18 03:58 AM
5

Irrefutable proof that having a PhD does not make you intelligent
/r/MensRights24/06/18 09:23 AM
2

I'm just repeating what the article says, I don't live in England fuckface
/r/MensRights20/06/18 02:31 AM
1

Police don't use it because there's reasonable doubt.
/r/MensRights19/06/18 05:01 AM
1

If it's with the intention of forcing sexual activity, e.g. oral pleasure, then it would be rape, otherwise just sexual assault / battery
/r/MensRights19/06/18 01:10 AM
-20

It's not actually. It's definitely not an exact science but reliable, meaningful results can be achieved, as was achieved in this case. And regardless labeling it as a pseudoscience is misleading.
/r/MensRights19/06/18 01:02 AM
202

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-44518706 The reason he blocked it is so that it would have to be debated in parliament, otherwise it would have just been implemented with no questioning or debate whatsoever. It's extremely slippery and dangerous territory when you start to implement new laws and legislation with 0 debate. If anything he's protecting the integrity of the law by doing this
/r/MensRights19/06/18 12:54 AM
1

I agree with the message (towards the start) that you should just get yourself out of that situation by running or walking away. But the way he turns the situation and the crowd against the man is absolutely disgusting.
/r/MensRights17/06/18 01:24 AM
2

Yes there are actually a lot of studies that contradict this one, here'ss one for example: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0956797611429803
/r/MensRights13/06/18 08:26 PM
17

I don't doubt it but one study really doesn't prove anything, and you need to link to the actual study, not just the abstract.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 10:24 AM
2

The validity of you "no difference" argument depends on choosing an irrelevant meaning of "can" such as "are allowed to". It's not irrelevant at all. It's completely relevant, and the meaning of "can" means "able to", women are able to ride on bike paths and roads as it is exactly as men are, a woman choosing not to doesn't mean the infrastructure needs to be changed. Would it be unscientific to survey the reasons M & F cyclists give for not using their bikes to commute into town, or why they ga…
/r/MensRights13/06/18 10:21 AM
2

What made you suddenly start talking about footpaths, apart from the temptation to invent a strawman? Are you someone who looks for things to get offended at? The point, which you obviously failed to get, is that there's 0 difference between male and female riders, if a male can use the road a female can. and I'm sure has been formally verified in many scientific studies I don't think you understand how scientific studies work
/r/MensRights13/06/18 04:03 AM
30

"Most of our cities are failing to design roads and streets for women to cycle," the charity said. I fail to see what the difference would be between a footpath for men and a footpath for women
/r/MensRights12/06/18 10:21 AM
1

Please next time you post make sure you use the right there / they're / their
/r/MensRights12/06/18 07:28 AM
37

"I thought I might take a second to speak to the ladies in the audience. (Guys, take a break; you don't have to pay attention during this part. Maybe spend the next 30 seconds thinking about all the extra money you'll make in your life for doing the same job as a woman. Pretty sweet.) Let's just insult and be condescending towards every single male in the audience, because why not. I still don't understand how actors and actresses think they have any standing at all to comment on issues such as …
/r/MensRights12/06/18 01:01 AM
3

Yeah, no. If you're not capable of discerning the gravity of different crimes, your opinion on the topic is void. Such as a life ruining false accusation? Rape is bad, but you can move on from rape. You can't easily move on from most, even most unsuccessful, rape allegations. It's life ruining. Lying about rape is far far worse than the crime of rape
/r/MensRights12/06/18 12:42 AM
3

Well, at least we now know a life ruining allegation is only worth a $200 fine.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 12:40 AM
61

Well I've never seen it so shut the fuck up
/r/MensRights11/06/18 08:23 AM
11

While I somewhat agree with the title of the article "Doctors should not fear prosecution for honest mistakes" there is a HUGE difference between honest mistakes and gross negligence. And this: “A clearer understanding of the bar for gross negligence manslaughter in law should lead to fewer criminal investigations which are limited to just those rare cases where an individual’s performance is so ‘truly exceptionally bad’ that it requires a criminal sanction, Is complete bullshit, as it is a doct…
/r/MensRights11/06/18 08:19 AM
3

The mods on r/legaladvice are self righteous, indignant pricks.
/r/MensRights10/06/18 01:09 AM
2

Research suggests that women are judged on performance, while men are judged on potential. What research? If you're going to make outlandish claims you better have a source to back them up.
/r/MensRights10/06/18 01:05 AM
33

I really don't understand how she's even considered to be an important or notable person. The only thing she's ever really done is married a successful husband, everything else has literally come from that. People act like she's in a unique position to comment on things but she's not, she's never achieved anything in her own rite
/r/MensRights09/06/18 01:39 PM
3

Mr McLeod’s lawyers, through the legal discovery process, revealed that Duke’s hearing panel members, who oversaw the case, were trained “that 98 per cent of the time, women who claim sexual assault are telling the truth”.
/r/MensRights07/06/18 11:06 PM
4

I still don't understand how people constantly refer to countries such as Saudi Arabia as if they live there or something
/r/MensRights07/06/18 11:00 PM
31

How are statistics even relevant. If I see someone getting attacked by someone e who’s Jewish or something I’m not gonna go like “Hmmm wait a minute, Jewish people are statistically less likely to attack someone,” and not do anything about it
/r/MensRights07/06/18 07:50 AM
1

You wanna prove that? Because the actual articles he used as sources literally said what the causes were. Like we literally know what the causes are but OP is saying we need to fund more research into looking at the causes. And then uses articles that literally state what the cause is to somehow back up his claim. You wanna actually read?
/r/MensRights05/06/18 12:33 PM
3

Please don't confuse psychopathy with being a moron.
/r/MensRights05/06/18 09:32 AM
6

Against one man
/r/MensRights05/06/18 09:31 AM
7

I live in Australia and find it's a lot better to date foreigners than it is to date Australians. Of course it's not everyone but a lot of Australian chicks have this really "you need to look after me" centric attitude.
/r/MensRights05/06/18 06:49 AM
0

Maybe you just suck at reading and aren't very smart
/r/MensRights05/06/18 01:00 AM
1

Defendants are actually cross examined by the prosecution if their lawyer chooses to put them on the stand. The important difference to note is that according to the fifth amendment someone can't be forced to testify against themselves, and according to common law they can't be forced to testify at all.
/r/MensRights05/06/18 12:20 AM
0

I didn't fail to address the study on child hood cancers at all. If you want to read the article or my comment you would have found that I took that above quote straight from the article in question about childhood cancers. In the article they literally say they know why is happens, thus rendering OPs whole point moot You
/r/MensRights05/06/18 12:13 AM
-1

So you just went on a rant about why there should be more funding to find the biological cause and you literally link to an article that answers the very question of why there’s a difference.....,,, Now, discoveries by Lane and the Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT reveal that genetic differences between males and females may account for some of the imbalance. A physician-researcher who studies the genetics of leukemia and potential treatments, Lane says that he and others noted that men with c…
/r/MensRights04/06/18 05:52 AM
1

This post is dumb Can you demonstrate a need to funding to find the biological causes of this? You haven't even demonstrated that we don't already know the biological causes yet. This is like the point that vegans live on average 9 years longer than meat eaters, while statistically true vegans are typically far more health conscious than other parts of the population. It's similar for men and women as well, women tend to be more health conscious than men. Also differences in diagnosis time can a…
/r/MensRights04/06/18 04:32 AM
1

Not possible. It's extremely important for the jury to see the defendant being cross examined and their reactions to things and other such things.
/r/MensRights04/06/18 04:21 AM
1

Having oestrogen won't actually really effect your testosterone levels that much, especially not enough so that having milk e.t.c. will have a noticeable impact. Testosterone is produced in the Sertoli cells of the testes and is made from carbohydrates
/r/MensRights04/06/18 04:17 AM
3

Yeah in Australia there's rooms for it along with disabled toilets
/r/MensRights04/06/18 04:14 AM
1

Did you get a lawyer? I'd rain hell down on the University
/r/MensRights03/06/18 01:20 AM
15

This is the thing, almost all women believe in equality, ask any woman on the street whether they believe in equal opportunity and they'll say yes. Ask them if they're a feminist and only about 5% will actually say yes because they see what feminism is. The point is feminists are the radicalised, extremists. They don't just have radicalised extremists, they are the radicalised extremists, if 5% of every group are extremists then out of everyone who believes in equal rights I wonder who the femin…
/r/MensRights03/06/18 01:13 AM
8

Remember that just because the school found you not guilty doesn't mean she won't go to the police. If the police do come exercise your right to stay silent (you actually need to say "I am choosing to exercise my right to stay silent") and ask for a lawyer, have all communications with anyone go through him. The thing is the police aren't on your side, it's a really common tactic to overload you with questions that could be interpreted any number of ways and then fix it to suit the narrative. Do…
/r/MensRights02/06/18 05:13 AM
20

Ah, why am I not surprised? What did she actually say in her complaint? It's unusual for university and college courts to be so rational
/r/MensRights02/06/18 05:06 AM
16

What did she claim you did?
/r/MensRights02/06/18 03:43 AM
3

Is there a point to linking this?
/r/MensRights01/06/18 11:10 PM
1

I think it's a huge reflection on the state of society that I had never even heard of the Alexandria shooting before.
/r/MensRights30/05/18 01:05 PM
1

You're really grasping at straws here
/r/MensRights30/05/18 01:03 PM
6

This is not just an American problem. Australia does not have the same level of gun violence as America, but in the past 20 years in Australia, six people have been killed (three of them perpetrators) This shit is hilarious. Apparently 3 people dying in the last 20 years is some sort of huge issue I also find it funny how she stated the definition of terrorism but then used it wrong. Terrorism is always in the pursuit of political aims, it's not terrorism if it isn't. The guy was in-arguably a f…
/r/MensRights30/05/18 12:49 AM
1

No, they're specifically selling it to make money
/r/MensRights30/05/18 12:43 AM
1

How likely is it that a man will murder a police officer in broad daylight at a routine traffic stop infront of his own family? Obviously very unlikely since the department hasn't had an officer involved shooting in more than 30 years, can you read? What kind of crazy idiot thinks that’s a dangerous situation that requires a lethal response? The guy told him he had a gun and then started reaching for something...... If he was anything but black I guarantee he wouldn’t of been shot under those te…
/r/MensRights29/05/18 03:46 AM
1

If you want to actually read that article you'll see that the man told the police officer that he had a gun as he was reaching for his wallet. It was a simple misunderstanding and had absolutely nothing to do with race. And if you had of read the article you would have read Sgt. Jon Mangseth, interim police chief in St. Anthony, a village outside of Minneapolis, said the shooting was the first he could remember in the department's history. "We haven't had an officer involved shooting in 30 years…
/r/MensRights28/05/18 11:41 PM
1

How do you think an unarmed black man at a traffic stop gets shot and bleeds out in front of his wife and kid by a trained police officer? You can't invent situations to suit your world view..... Give me an example of that actually happening.
/r/MensRights27/05/18 10:54 PM
-2

Yeah I've seen that before. How the hell is that of any relevance? There's a huge difference between a company marketing their product to their target audience and a mother ruining a mans life..... When we complain about something such as marketing, something that has no actual effect on anyone, we only become more and more like the feminists we so despise.
/r/MensRights27/05/18 11:35 AM
0

I wouldn't really say it's hypocritical. You have 2 complete different sets of circumstances
/r/MensRights27/05/18 10:44 AM
-5

How do you think the marketing of a product is a legitimate issue? It's a fact that men are a lot biologically stronger than women, thus lots of women feel the need to get things such as pepper spray (whereas men don't) How is marketing your product to your target audience an issue or a bad thing?
/r/MensRights27/05/18 10:42 AM
-25

It’s still pathetic to be posting a picture like that, all it does is make him look immature
/r/MensRights27/05/18 03:50 AM
-21

Why is this crap being upvoted? I mean he can do whatever he wants with his life but it's really not something to gloat about........
/r/MensRights26/05/18 09:31 PM
8

This, I really ddon't see how it's an issue, this is the type of shit feminists make an issue over
/r/MensRights26/05/18 02:47 PM
23

Well maybe we should focus on the one that's the biggest problem? Rather than completely ignoring one side and demonising the other
/r/MensRights26/05/18 06:19 AM
7

I love it how he just doubles down instead of admitting his mistake
/r/MensRights25/05/18 01:53 PM
7

Every serial killer who has ever existed has suffered childhood abuse of some sort. I guess we should let them out too
/r/MensRights24/05/18 11:30 AM
7

I'm not sure about the claims in the article but it is really important to note that false memories are actually a very real thing. There was a researcher who was actually doing research on false memories who herself found her to be the victim of one. Her mother or something had died during her childhood and recently her aunt or someone had mentioned how she had apparently found her body in the pool. The researcher ended up having a false memory of that and remembering it vividly, until a few we…
/r/MensRights24/05/18 11:25 AM
3

Do not sell the house no matter what, there's no way you can ensure that money goes to the right place. Getting the criminal charges dealt with is definitely the first thing to do. Is there any way that you can prove your wife is lying? Because really unless you can get undeniable proof that your wife is lying you're pretty much fucked here
/r/MensRights24/05/18 05:09 AM
3

I never said anything about whether it was related to the men's rights issue. I don't believe it is. My point is just that laws shouldn't conflict with each other, but regardless he is a scumbag and deserved what he got.
/r/MensRights24/05/18 12:27 AM
15

The point is that one of the charges was "fetal homicide" which he ended up pleading guilty to, but that law conflicts completely with current abortion laws. However these charges were all justified (under law at least): Imran was charged last June with premeditated killing of a fetus of another and illegally causing abortion or miscarriage. Online records show he was also charged in November with assault and altering food, drink and drugs https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/true-crime/wp/2018/0…
/r/MensRights23/05/18 11:44 PM
9

Sentences for false rape allegations are ridiculous. She didn't just accuse 3 men of rape, she tried to ruin the lives of 3 innocent men. I really don't understand how attempting to ruin the lives of 3 innocent people only gets her 4 years, that should be 20 minimum
/r/MensRights23/05/18 11:37 PM
2

when a person pleads guilty, they get a sentencing discount for taking responsibility for the crime, but they lose the right to appeal Not really, generally pleading guilty is looked upon favorably though.
/r/MensRights23/05/18 05:43 AM
1

There's no such thing as heat in England
/r/MensRights21/05/18 02:08 PM
2

Not secret, just protecting the identity of people who haven't been convicted of rape. And if anything it would conserve the integrity of the justice system. For example if I get accused of rape and found not guilty, then I get accused of rape again but by a different person. The fact that there was a previous accusation / not guilty verdict isn't allowed to be mentioned to the jury in court for the other trial. But as it is this very same jury can very easily just google your name, judges of co…
/r/MensRights19/05/18 04:30 PM
9

It definitely isn't a proven false allegation. My point is that if it only takes a jury 3 hours to find him not guilty (given juries are made up of 12 people, and thus often have some very liberal / left leaning people and the fact that it often takes days for a jury to come to a verdict) then it really shouldn't have been brought before the courts. Also there's the fact that even though he was found not guilty his life is ruined, the first thing anyone find when they google his name will be art…
/r/MensRights19/05/18 11:38 AM
21

The prosecution really shouldn't be going through with a case on such flimsy evidence.
/r/MensRights19/05/18 11:05 AM
2

To be honest that's fair enough. Employers have no obligation to employ you and why would they when you may make their customers uncomfortable?
/r/MensRights19/05/18 12:47 AM
4

Yep, I've heard all too often "there's no perfect way to be a parent", I mean that may be true but there sure as hell is a bad way to be a parent
/r/MensRights16/05/18 08:52 AM
11

This is a non issue, this is the kind of stuff that feminists get mad at, let’s please not stoop to their level
/r/MensRights15/05/18 08:31 AM
1

But the law even says that whoever would allow them to develop gets to keep them. That’s like forcing someone to impregnate someone else, it’s ridiculous
/r/MensRights15/05/18 08:30 AM
4

I fail to understand how some people, especially supposed "think tanks" continually fail to understand the difference between equal opportunity and equal outcome
/r/MensRights10/05/18 05:46 PM
1

There's heaps of shitty loan companies with (unfortunately) high interest rates, just google quick loans
/r/MensRights09/05/18 09:55 PM
10

3pm My boss comes to me and tells me that having to miss for all of this is affecting their business numbers. She tells me that if I don’t Start picking up on productivity that my job is in danger. This devastates me. I have no mental capacity left to defend myself. It’s all been spent elsewhere. This kind of shit, I wonder exactly what that boss would say if you were a woman........
/r/MensRights09/05/18 12:36 PM
3

Get a loan, this is serious business and never underestimate the ability of the "justice" system too get a verdict wrong, especially without a lawyer. Just get the money, it will be worth any amount of debt. Not winning this case could fuck you up for life.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 08:45 AM
1

I just checked this and got the exact same thing
/r/MensRights08/05/18 12:09 AM
2

What crevice did you pull THAT notion from? Care to reread your comment? I'm talking about the guys doing the deep work that's done by people with problems interacting with other people. The guys that have no social skills, but can build you the next microprocessor or whatever widget is going to make your company a billion dollars. And please also reread my comment. I never said anything about your initial comment, I just added on by saying that incels aren't common at all in such companies I do…
/r/MensRights04/05/18 05:40 AM
1

That’s a ridiculous generalisation and is completely untrue. I know many academics and scientists and all of them are really kind, friendly, outgoing people who often have families and are active in their community. Take your stupid preconceived bullshit amount intelligent people elsewhere
/r/MensRights04/05/18 04:24 AM
2

I doubt many big tech companies even have incels. To work at a company like Facebook you generally need to be pretty left leaning as well as just generally outgoing and friendly
/r/MensRights04/05/18 03:35 AM
1

The thing is though if it''s a false allegation it allows them to change their story, sure the texts show one thing, but they'll have time to come up with a reason for why they said that thing. And there's no fucking way I'd trust a jury, people aren't that smart, especially when you have a smallish woman accusing a man of something
/r/MensRights03/05/18 11:40 PM
44

One of the really really really bad things about this is that it means in order for the defense to introduce such evidence they first have to have a hearing with the judge, prosecutor, and alleged victim as well as the alleged victims lawyer in order for it to be admissible. This allows the alleged victim to change details of their story and significantly reduces the chance of them being caught in a lie.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 11:52 AM
1

The constantly calling the police is proof of harassment as well as frivolous use of emergency services. I would recommend at least consulting with a family lawyer immediately. Also she doesn't need a parental consent form at all. The only case in which she would need something like that is if a judge rules that she must have your permission to take the kids out of state
/r/MensRights03/05/18 11:09 AM
1

Especially on that subreddit, the community is so toxic. They also read into things wayyyyy too much: You did something your partner didn't like and he's annoyed about it? : He's obviously a a full blown narcissist
/r/MensRights01/05/18 09:33 PM
22

There was a thread where a GF was angry because her boyfriend didn't use a condom. What had happened was OP (the girlfriend) had told BF prior to sex that she was on the pill, BF assumed this to mean that they didn't need to use a condom (just as anyone else would assume) and they fucked and then when GF saw BF didn't have the condom on got pissed and posted to reddit. The amount of people calling him a rapist was ridiculous. They couldn't understand that it was a simple mistake caused by the wa…
/r/MensRights30/04/18 08:40 PM
1

Yes, discrimination, not sex discrimination
/r/MensRights30/04/18 07:26 PM
1

The only time the term should ever be used is when someone in a lower position than a woman assumes they have no idea what they're doing just because they're a woman and is condescending about it. E.g. if an undergrad maths major explains something basic condescendingly to a woman with a doctorate in mathematics. And even then it shouldn't really be used.
/r/MensRights30/04/18 03:49 PM
2

I would recommend creating your own table, that one doesn't really illustrate the difference between male and female suicide rates in a clear way.
/r/MensRights30/04/18 03:33 PM
4

Most studies put it at around 85% male and 65% female What?
/r/MensRights30/04/18 03:31 PM
2

I would also add a source for the stigma thing, it shouldn't be too hard to find a relatable study. Otherwise it's purely just your speculation
/r/MensRights30/04/18 03:31 PM
1

Because just because a collective group is likely to do something more than another, that doesn’t mean that any ONE individual will. How is a statistic based on a collective group and not any one individual NOT discriminatory? I think you need to learn how statistics work. It's letting maths do the discrimination
/r/MensRights30/04/18 05:57 AM
0

And how exactly would an insurance company police how much someone drives?
/r/MensRights30/04/18 05:51 AM
0

Yes
/r/MensRights30/04/18 05:50 AM
1

If your only reason why we shouldn’t discriminate based on statistics is because the law says so then you really have no argument.
/r/MensRights30/04/18 03:29 AM
1

Everything is discrimination if you get down to it, me not wanting to have a junkie as a room mate over a friend is discrimination. What’s important is whether the discrimination is justified. And I very much believe that anything based off of statistical modelling for a service such as insurance (where everything is about risk and probabilities) is a justifiable type of discrimination
/r/MensRights30/04/18 01:05 AM
0

Firstly do you have any statistical evidence to support your claim or is it just pure speculation? Secondly unfortunately insurance companies aren’t allowed to ask what race you are so they can’t carry insurance rate dependant upon that anyway
/r/MensRights30/04/18 12:40 AM
1

I hate where society is at right now as well, but I just think that making it so that no matter what the price has to be the same for women and men is a BIG step backwards.
/r/MensRights30/04/18 12:39 AM
1

Statistical modelling does not count as sex discrimination....
/r/MensRights30/04/18 12:37 AM
2

No sex is being discriminated against though. Actuaries apply a statistical analysis which in turn dictates how they price insurance for person A vs person B. I don’t see anything wrong with applying mathematics and logic to the real world, I definitely don’t see it as discriminatory. The whole insurance industry is based around the risk factors and costs, if the risk factor for something occurring in one group of people is higher than it is in another then why should they be taxed more? I mean …
/r/MensRights30/04/18 12:36 AM
3

The problem is when it comes to health insurance, women should have it higher because statistics indicate they use more services, but in this case a law was passed against it. That's a very good point, just curious what country is this in? I'd like to look into it more Still though, I think insurance companies should have an absolute right to charge whatever they want to charge. (both ways) The concept of having to pay more simply because someone else is more likely to get into a road accident t…
/r/MensRights29/04/18 09:19 PM
6

I agree with you complete by the way, I think it's fucking disgraceful the way car insurance companies discriminate against men. Even if you have no history whatsoever of any car accidents and so on they'll still charge you a hideous amount just based on gender or your post code. Insurance is based on statistics, if you're more likely to crash your insurance costs more, if you're more likely to be robbed your insurance costs more. That's not a bad thing
/r/MensRights29/04/18 09:12 PM
-79

No it isn't, insurance is based purely on statistics. If crime goes up in your area your insurance goes up. Statistics aren't discriminatory.
/r/MensRights29/04/18 07:53 PM
1

There’s a reason the majority of women don’t identify as feminists and there’s also a reason we never see feminists protesting for men’s rights
/r/MensRights29/04/18 01:21 PM
1

This is just one dumb moron on twitter, the majority of people don't have opinions like hat
/r/MensRights29/04/18 07:49 AM
1

And I’m saying that there are members who are simply pro equal rights They're by far a minority
/r/MensRights29/04/18 07:48 AM
1

The point of that comment was to acknowledge the difficulty in choosing to live in such a way, but also to remind others that just because OP happily does the lion's share of household chores while also working full time, it doesn't mean all other men or women do so happily as well. But how is that an equality issue at all? If someone isn't happy with their partner they can leave the relationship
/r/MensRights28/04/18 12:05 PM
2

they call it some variation of "false consciousness." Or more commonly "internalised misogyny" But yeah feminists contradict themselves constantly
/r/MensRights28/04/18 12:03 PM
4

That has nothing to do with my post or comment. You are right though, the practise of circumcision is ridiculous. I'm lucky that it isn't really practised in my country (Australia) but I've read before that in America doctors textbooks don't even have diagrams of penis's with the foreskin
/r/MensRights28/04/18 10:45 AM
3

ahahahah, that's literally the feminist mindset though. If they like something they shouldn't it's because of society and/or brainwashing
/r/MensRights28/04/18 10:41 AM
1

This isn't a legal sub, maybe they didn't word it the best but it's still relatively obvious what they're talking about. Also why are you so incensed to the point of having to cuss at complete strangers on the Internet to try to communicate your preconceived notions and shoddily made conclusions? Do you think expletives magically make your point any more valid? In no way, shape, or form am I thinking I trying to police someone's way of living by saying what I did. Maybe before you jump the gun a…
/r/MensRights28/04/18 10:39 AM
3

Exactly it's only rape if the woman (or man) says no / fights back or isn't capable of consent (e.g. blackout drunk) And pressuring someone into sex isn't rape either, it is morally reprehensible (if they actually do it) but it definitely isn't rape. Unless it's blackmailed or implied blackmail
/r/MensRights28/04/18 06:58 AM
3

Once you tell other feminist women that you're not a feminist, the apparent belief in 'freedom for women to choose' evaporates pretty damn quick. This so much Feminists like to act like everything a woman does that they don't agree with is the result of brainwashing or force of some kind. As if every stay at home mom is forced at gunpoint to do so. Personal choice is completely flushed down the drain when it's something they don't agree with
/r/MensRights28/04/18 06:57 AM
4

And the woman is basically automatically believed by all of society. There's an assumption of guilt
/r/MensRights28/04/18 06:55 AM
6

What if this child is a result of marital rape? What is with peoples insistence on using extremely marginal cases to justify something for the majority? Of course people who rape shouldn't have any right to the child of the product of their rape, but we aren't talking about that, we're talking about consensual sex. Well that's great for you. Not everyone could do what you do AND pursue a full career along with it. Especially not without feeling completely exhausted. Well this is about personal p…
/r/MensRights28/04/18 06:54 AM
1

They definitely have to be fully aware of what's going on and who they're sleeping with (e.g. know where they know them from) for it to be consensual.
/r/MensRights28/04/18 06:42 AM
2

About women doing the housework I really don't think there's an issue at all. It's about personal choice, in a relationship you need to divvy up responsibilities acceptably, if both partners agree for the husband to be a working dad and the woman to be a stay at home mom there's nothing wrong with that. If both partners agree for the husband to be a stay at home dad and the wife to be a working mom there's nothing wrong with that either. If you can't agree on this kind of thing then it's going t…
/r/MensRights28/04/18 06:40 AM
6

I wouldn't necessarily say so. Not all communication is verbal Almost everyone has probably had sex where the question "Do you want to have sex?" was never actually asked. But because of body language and reciprocating advances there has been consent. As long as the person isn't passed out it isn't rape unless they say no or push your hands away or something else that lets you know they don't want it.
/r/MensRights28/04/18 06:33 AM
4

r/niceguys is a minority, there's really not many of them and pretty much all guys think they're a fucking joke and pathetic. On the other hand friendzoning someone seems to be acceptable and applaudable even. I have no problem with a woman not being interested in someone, but unfortunately a lot of women do seem to lead guys on and flirt with them just for the benefits that come with it such as free food, transportation, e.t.c. e.t.c., it's that kind of thing that I absolutely despise.
/r/MensRights28/04/18 06:29 AM
15

https://www.reddit.com/r/Feminism/comments/8eqw50/obgyns_do_not_learn_the_nerves_and_vasculature_of/ Yep, it's ridiculous. Acting as if they have the qualifications to question what specialists learn. Doctors often complete an undergrad degree and then do at least 4 years of med school after that. Then after that there's still residency as well as a huge amount of exams and study if they want to even begin to specialise. But no, this random people on the internet absolutely have the qualificatio…
/r/MensRights28/04/18 06:22 AM
1

I've been banned from there too many times to count. The last time was for pointing out that you can't just invent a quote by somebody, even if you think that quote is "implied". It's really sad that they just ban everyone anyone with different opinions or anyone criticising them. All it does is lend itself to their hivemind and groupthink mentality, it's the absolute best way for them to become more and more ignorant. I'd love it if more feminists posted here because then that would contribute …
/r/MensRights27/04/18 11:06 PM
1

Just because you use the label feminist to mean "Equality between the sexes" doesn't mean that is how it is commonly used. In fact "Equality" is viewed very differently between 1st, 2nd, and 3rd wave feminism. Exactly, I find that feminists just use it as a convenient little mantra to fall back on whenever you criticise them. I'm sure everyone has heard the much repeated "So you're not for equal rights?!" whenever they criticise feminists for anything at all.
/r/MensRights27/04/18 11:02 PM
2

You've fallen into the feminist trap. There's a reason that the vast majority of women do not identify themselves as feminists - and it's not because they don't believe in equal rights. It's because of the absolute absurdity of anyone who identifies as a feminist. Just because some people tell you feminism is about equal rights doesn't mean that it is. A movement is defined by what its members protest for, and feminists absolutely do not protest for equal rights. The "equal rights" saying is jus…
/r/MensRights27/04/18 11:00 PM
2

Is it though? It seems pretty accurate for a lot of feminists despite what they claim to be after
/r/MensRights27/04/18 10:54 PM
6

I think it would be useful for a lot of people, people in general just don't seem to really understand how to interpret statistics well. A lot don't seem to understand the concept of outliers not the concept of context and what statistics actually show, all they show is a difference statistically, they don't necessarily show or confirm a reason for the difference.
/r/MensRights27/04/18 12:26 PM
10

This 100%. I’ve seen this kind of shit so much (usually people using it to argue that systematic racism still exists). You absolutely cannot compare raw statistics, it’s impossible, you can’t even compare any statistics as they don’t account for the whole situation at all. You can only compare them anecdotally on a case by case basis
/r/MensRights27/04/18 12:07 PM
1

Yep, they get so angry whenever you bring up the fact that inherent differences between gender exist. I remember a while ago there was an askreddit thread about something to do with self defense training for women and how it worked for them. Almost every person relayed stories of them feeling really confident e.t.c. but then when play wrestling with their partner or whatever they were still nowhere near a match for them. And it wasn't like these were all really built men or anything, a lot of th…
/r/MensRights22/04/18 01:25 AM
2

I would say it's more because the types of women who are going to do the marathon are the types that are extremely motivated. Physical activity (such as marathon running) is actually a lot harder for women than it is for men, which mean the few women that do do it are really motivated. Whereas for men you just have a lot of people who almost even just basically went one day "Yeah I reckon I'll do this" and aren't necessarily really that motivated. Basically just inherent differences within the t…
/r/MensRights22/04/18 12:57 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter