TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Jojajones Archive

View 0 posts and 13 comments by Jojajones on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

Anyone who has to make their whole identity about how much of a man they are like he, and several other prominent far right personalities, have are absolutely going to be cowards. Because at the very least they are going to be terrified that someone finds out that they’re faking it (after all, their caricature of masculinity is so far from true masculinity it might as well be on a different planet). Someone who is truly brave wouldn’t be afraid to let others know when they’re afraid because they…
/r/ExRedPill02/03/23 02:57 AM
0

As a man I really wanted to believe in this sub because I know there are issues that need to be tackled (double standard about date rape, false accusations about rape to ruin a man, domestic violence discrimination, and parental rights/custody just to name a few). But I have not seen a single sourced counter point to any of my claims instead I get replies with sexist stereotypes Why don't women get promoted as highly? Because they aren't prepared to make the sacrifices necessary to do so. Despit…
/r/MensRights04/03/19 04:40 PM
-1

That is exactly what is logical. If 50% of the workforce is women then 50% of every level of management should also be women unless there is a force interfering with that distribution. Guess what! That force is called discrimination.
/r/MensRights04/03/19 08:24 AM
-2

what proof specifically? cite your sources?
/r/MensRights04/03/19 08:08 AM
-5

I'm spouting logical conclusions from the information presented. In return I get: -ad hominem (attack person instead of rhetoric) -non sequitor (reference something completely unrelated) -poorly researched or blatantly untrue claims (which I provide counter arguments to) -poor attempts to rationalize and approve of this pattern What I have done: -point out that the fact that there are no non-executive women is discrimination What I haven't done: -said the companies should be fined for this imbal…
/r/MensRights04/03/19 07:57 AM
-1

I never said enforce anywhere. I said there was discrimination and there is because there is no legitimate reason to believe there are not enough qualified or capable women out there to do the job. There are no statistically significant differences in terms of capabilities in non physical endeavors and yet women are not equally represented in business leadership. This is an issue that needs to be addressed. I never said laws and enforcement were the solution it's just this entire thread is denyi…
/r/MensRights04/03/19 06:47 AM
-2

None of them are in an age where time commitments would be an issues. IQ distribution between sexes is even so that point is flat out false (men excel at certain parts and women at others but numbers are even). Find a valid source for your aggression in negotiations or stop using stereotypes as argument points. And taking the uninterrupted work history into account is sexist in both directions (men deserve paternity leave as much as women deserve maternity leave). ​ Not one of these women board …
/r/MensRights04/03/19 04:41 AM
-8

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6764881/Britains-highest-paid-banker-rakes-6-3m-year-16-female-board-members-COMBINED.html
/r/MensRights04/03/19 04:09 AM
-6

You made a non sequitor argument (a logical fallacy, a.k.a. not a valid counter point) and I called you on it. HP's CEO didn't make it because the article is focusing on banks so it doesn't make sense to bring in a CEO from a non banking company. It wasn't about women in business leadership in general it was about the banks.
/r/MensRights04/03/19 03:59 AM
-5

Since when is HP a bank? The article is specifically about banks
/r/MensRights04/03/19 03:41 AM
-21

I didn't say there should be equal distribution. I said there should be at least one executive the fact that there isn't any form of executive in the top women from those four banks is blatant discrimination. It's not just Chief executive positions they were excluded from. ​ And the fact that both of my comments about how this is actual sexism, and every other comment that says the same, got downvoted to oblivion I'm very concerned about the state of this sub. Men's rights do not need to come at…
/r/MensRights04/03/19 03:06 AM
-33

Between 4 banks there should have been at least 1 woman executive if there wasn't gender discrimination in play, after all women make up approximately 50% of the population so you would expect 50% of the positions to be filled by women if there isn't discrimination.
/r/MensRights04/03/19 02:36 AM
-19

This isn't about pay gap so much as lack of sexual equality in leadership positions. The women don't make as much because they don't get promoted as highly, this is something to discuss and correct. Read the title more carefully. Those are the women that hold the highest positions in the banks in question, there was no other chief executive with with to make a comparison and that is the problem they were trying to highlight.
/r/MensRights04/03/19 02:30 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter