TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Jonmad17 Archive

View 0 posts and 85 comments by Jonmad17 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

If not wanting to be constantly shamed and dehumanized in public is too much to ask for, then you have a pathological hatred of the group being targeted. I don't go out of my way to shame women I'm not physically attracted to, and I think that it's okay for women to view the men who do do that as assholes.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/23 11:49 PM
8

Bro, I don't know how to tell you this, but women liked tall men long before TikTok existed. Wanting to minimize the public shaming of people for a trait they have no control over isn't the same as demanding that anyone find those people attractive. Women preferring tall men isn't the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/23 11:08 PM
16

Social media is a reflection of real life. You think that thousands of videos with millions of views each of girls hating on short men doesn't represent a real-world phenomenon? Andrew Tate gets fewer likes on his tweets and that lead to a thousand articles written about the rise of online misogyny. Even if many of the girls in those videos didn't feel this way inherently, they scope of these videos makes it almost certain that they'll see it, and it'll influence their dating preferences going f…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/23 10:45 PM
1

"I can't argue your point, so I'm just gonna ignore it"
/r/ExRedPill13/07/21 08:09 PM
1

I didn't say that. I gave two scenarios, one which illustrates an ideal and the other who actually believes it's a biological marker for hypergamy. And why does that bother you? This "damned if you do/I can't win" victimization framing is a very "nice girl" way of collectively blaming men for their unreasonableness, rather than going through the trouble of viewing men as individuals with distinct beliefs and desires. It's lazy and dehumanizing
/r/ExRedPill13/07/21 08:09 PM
1

I actually do think that applying moral standards to art is useless, the problem is that we live in a culture that doesn't feel that way. There's a mountain of discourse when it comes to the treatment of women and people of color in art (some of which I'm expected to engage in, given my brown skin) that suddenly disappears when those same moral standards can't be part of a wider cultural narrative on race and gender. And not only aren't those same standards applied to these works, but these work…
/r/ExRedPill13/07/21 07:58 PM
1

I'm just gonna ignore the last paragraph of your post, which is not only incredibly salty and matronizing, but besides the point. You made the comparison yourself, between average men who find assertiveness in women desirable, and red pilled men who see it as an indication of women's true licentious nature. My problem is with this ridiculous "Damned if you do, damned if you don't" dichotomy. You're upset that there isn't a single set of behavioral characteristics that appeal to every man ever, w…
/r/ExRedPill13/07/21 07:43 PM
1

The problem with the show is that her actions aren't perceived as immoral by the show itself. Her cheating and manipulation is part and parcel of her liberation. The show goes out of its way to use feminist language (literally quotes the Feminine Mystique) to portray her cheating as almost heroic
/r/ExRedPill13/07/21 07:14 PM
1

imagine if women were this sensitive bro. There's an entire academic discipline dedicated to women being sensitive about their portrayal in media
/r/ExRedPill13/07/21 07:08 PM
1

Two different groups of people have two different ideas of what constitutes an ideal. How is this not normal?
/r/ExRedPill13/07/21 07:05 PM
6

You know that human beings are evolved animals, right? And that men can't have babies by themselves? The existence and cheapness of sperm banks means that if a woman wants to have a baby, there's literally no consensual barrier for her doing so.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/19 07:20 PM
5

You slow buddy? I'm saying that women not having to worry about being selected against sexually is a privilege. They determine the gene pool, and men are either selected for or against, and often for characteristics that they have no control over.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/19 07:11 PM
10

I'd be fine with being sexually selected out of the gene pool if A, not a single cent of my tax revenue went to a single mom, and B, if we didn't stop pretending that not having to shoulder the burden of sexual selection isn't a huge privilege that women have.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/19 06:33 PM
3

Are you fucking kidding me? Men are constantly chastised for what they post online. Fat-shaming has literally gotten people fired from jobs. Yet height-shaming isn't even seen as a legitimate thing by many people.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/19 06:28 PM
2

Dating apps facilitated a culture of non-monogamy, and non-monogamy always benefits a majority of women and a minority of men. This is true of most species of mammal, in that there's a huge differentiation in access to sex between dominant males and submissive ones (however dominance and submissiveness is defined in each particular species). It makes sense, given that a single male mammal can fertilize an endless number of female mammals, but the reverse can't happen. If all the men were to die …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/19 04:04 PM
3

There can't possibly be a hierarchy regarding who has access to sex in a monogamous culture. We've never lived in a perfectly monogamous culture, but the less monogamous it is the more this hierarchy exerts itself. And it's not necessarily "standards" that are the reason behind fewer men having sex, it's just access to better men. Dating apps give women access to men across an entire city, not just at a particular bar or social circle, so men have to compete with hundreds and thousands of men, a…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/19 03:13 PM
4

Yes they are. They're on tinder as well as more exclusive apps. It's not unheard of to see a celebrity on tinder, depending where you live. That's besides the point though, the point is that there's a sexual hierarchy among men that, whether intentionally or not, is facilitated by dating apps. Men just have a much wider field to compete against now.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/19 02:34 PM
3

I don't buy this. My sister is overweight and I've seen her refuse to date guys for pretty innocuous reasons. I just think that fat women are upset because because they can't date the quality of man that they think they deserve. But that wasn't the point of what we were arguing, the question was whether or not dating is more difficult for men than it was for our parents' generation, and the answer is clearly yes, given the sharp rise of male sexlessness. So given that it's pretty clearly demonst…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/19 02:30 PM
4

It's designed to funnel women to people like the men who created it: rich, attractive, and highly-educated white guys. It's not designed to benefit men as a whole, which is why it lead to a pretty severe sexual hierarchy among men.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/19 02:19 PM
4

If weight was the driving factor, then it would affect women as much as men, given that their obesity levels are comparable (men are more likely to be overweight, but women are more likely to be obese). But that's clearly not it. If anything, women are more openminded about weight than men are. And if the issue was lack of a place to bring people to, then it's worth noting that the percentage of adult men living with their parents is not much higher than the percentage of adult women living with…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/19 02:12 PM
8

The Washington Post article that demonstrated that people were having less sex also claimed that men were the primary drivers of that trend, and that men were twice as likely to not have sex than women were. And no, it has nothing to do with gaming. Games didn't suddenly become much more engrossing in 2012 than they were in 2008. Again, the trend matches almost perfectly with the rise of tinder and other dating apps.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/19 01:47 PM
1

Just because you want something doesn't mean you can get it. In a monogamous culture the paucity of tall men makes it so that even if women want them, not all women can have them. But given that people are becoming less and less monogamous and tall men can be shared, height filters on dating apps are facilitating a sexual hierarchy among men that's tied very closely to height. Why do you think that so many guys are complaining about it all of a sudden? Every study released on the subject shows t…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/19 01:41 PM
4

All of those trends began prior to 2009. The only major shift to occur in that period regarding how men behave and how people couple is the rise of dating apps. And it makes sense when you think about it. Back in the day you only had to compete with your friend group or the other guys at the bar. Now you have to compete with every other man in the city, which women have access to all day every day through their phones.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/19 01:32 PM
1

Women actually only care if their SO is taller than them I would say that half of all women only want their boyfriends to be taller than them, but the other half want their boyfriends to be tall in relation to other men, regardless of how tall they themselves are.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/19 01:26 PM
2

No, but women do deserved to be chastised for this shit: https://imgur.com/a/8TJan
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/19 01:19 PM
2

And you're not entitled to people not attacking you for your preference. Men are constantly attacked for liking younger and thinner women. There's an entire academic field devoted to attempting to deconstruct the beauty standards men hold for women
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/19 01:19 PM
6

Explain this trending very closely with the rise of online dating: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D21MPkPW0AEiL0N.jpg
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/19 01:09 PM
2

It's not the job of 19 year olds on a night out to massage some random man's hurt feelings It's everyone's job to not be assholes to anyone. It's insane how libertarian and solipsistic society has become when it comes to dealing with the emotions of others. I bet that the sharp rise in anxiety and depression has something to do with this.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/19 01:02 AM
2

I can't speak to female preferences, but I can be more sexually attracted to a woman due to her status. Not necessarily money, but status brought about by some inherent talent, like artistic ability. I'm sure that for some women the power being wealthy gives you can be a sexually attractive trait.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/19 06:26 AM
1

Gross
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/19 06:12 AM
3

5'7" is only three inches below average. It's as far from the mean as 6'1" is. So it's not particularly short. Try being 5'6" or 5'5". It's been a huge barrier to dating for me. Women regularly ghost me on tinder after the height question comes up, regardless of how well the conversation was going beforehand. I've had female friends flat-out tell me that they'd date me if I was taller. Height is certainly a significant issue for a lot of men, and it's not a characteristic that men have any contr…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/19 09:17 AM
6

The problem is that most of the characteristics that make women attracted to men are purely genetic. Height, facial symmetry, and hairline are all beyond one's control as a guy, and if you're screwed in two or more of those categories, there's nothing you can do about it. I mean, I have trouble dating as a short guy despite having visible abs, a nice sense of style, and decent charisma. There's no amount of effort I can put into my appearance that'll offset women's height requirements. Same is l…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/19 07:30 AM
17

Most men that are above a 6/10 can get casual sex, so they're getting casual sex. Where do you get this notion from? The gini coefficient of tinder is about that of the most unequal countries on Earth. Lots of average-looking guys don't have access to casual sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/19 07:24 AM
1

Because of body dysmorphia, which is a diagnosable mental illness. There are 110 lbs girls who starved themselves because they felt fat.
/r/TheRedPill08/03/19 05:44 PM
3

Money isn't status. It literally is, though. Money, fame, and looks are all components of status.
/r/TheRedPill08/03/19 05:42 PM
9

It's a small correlation, apparently. I bet it's mostly intra-racial; the smartest kids in my classes tended to be short Asians.
/r/TheRedPill08/03/19 05:40 PM
3

The fact that most rape accusers don't speak up has little to do with the percentage of rape accusations that end up being false. People always bring up the two as if they're connected, but they're really not. A decent percentage of rape accusations can end up being false and most rape victims can remain silent. Those two facts can coexist. Good riddance. Careers were always been destroyed, reputations were always being ruined, lives wrecked sometimes. The last major American movement where peop…
/r/MensRights12/11/18 11:37 AM
2

In the US the prosecution has to not only demonstrate that the defendant lied, but the burden is on the plaintiff to prove that it was a deliberate lie, which isn't possible in many sexual assault cases. There are also no federal defamation laws, and fewer than half of all states have criminal defamation laws in their books (which are rarely enforced). So in a #BelieveAllWomen America there's literally no social or legal recourse for a man that was falsely accused unless he can actually demonstr…
/r/MensRights12/11/18 09:56 AM
3

The NY Times keep a list of accusations, there are just over 200 after a year, going back up to 30 years or so. Say 20 years, that is 10 per year. This is a profoundly stupid point. The only reason the number is that small is because it consists primarily of famous men, who are pretty rare among the general population. Do you honestly perceive the #metoo movement as being isolated to instances of powerful media moguls pressuring young interns to have sex with them? The movement has had a profoun…
/r/MensRights12/11/18 06:39 AM
2

How do you estimate the number of false rape accusations when the only data are number of accusations, number of charges, and number of sentences? There's no real way to determine what parentage of the gap between the accusations and the charges end up being false unless you extrapolate from the objective sentencing numbers, which means pre-selecting for instances where the evidence was convincing enough for prosecutors to bring charges (i.e. instances where the rape most likely occurred). Estim…
/r/MensRights12/11/18 03:03 AM
4

40% seems like a ridiculous number, but the problem with many of the lower estimates is that they tend to only consider prosecuted rape charges, as opposed to accusations in themselves. And the vast majority of #metoo accusations aren't brought to court. Also, before #metoo prosecutors used to recommend victims go through the ordeal only when their cases were overwhelming, so those statistics already select for cases where the rape most likely occurred.
/r/MensRights12/11/18 12:23 AM
1

Anything by Michel Houellebecq. He's considered one of the best contemporary French authors, and spreads red pill ideas about the sexual revolution, the male sexual hierarchy, and the dissolution of the family to millions of people. He wrote a satirical novel called Submission about an Islamic takeover of France, which coincidentally came out the same day as the Charlie Hebdo attacks. It's one of the best books i've ever read. It's sort of a dystopian novel where there's a civil war between righ…
/r/TheRedPill21/08/18 11:59 AM
7

I wonder if the meme of women getting sleeve tattoos has something to do with this
/r/TheRedPill13/08/18 07:39 PM
3

If she makes more money than you most of the risk inherent to marriage is gone. You can just leave without losing anything. You don't even have to fleece her and take half of her money. You can just leave. If you're looking for a LTR it's imperative that you choose your economic equal or better.
/r/TheRedPill01/08/18 07:27 AM
3

Is there any research into excess masturbation and sperm production? It's safe to assume that men masturbate more often now give the availability of porn on the internet. And while regular ejaculation obviously doesn't affect sperm count, I wonder if compulsive masturbation (i.e. multiple times a day until you body can't keep up with production) could that have a long-term effect on your body's ability to manufacture sperm? Sperm is made up of nutrients that aren't infinitely available in one's …
/r/TheRedPill29/07/18 03:01 AM
2

I love how the article starts off with the notion that "low sperm count can be indicative of many health problems, and can even lead to an early death", and ends with "it's not like we need more sperm anyways." You can only possibly hold those two concurrent thoughts if you genuinely believe that it's okay for men to have health problems en masse.
/r/TheRedPill29/07/18 02:35 AM
1

You're the one who equated voting left with supporting single mothers and being anti-family. Where? That was a different poster.
/r/TheRedPill27/06/18 11:38 AM
2

You're thinking about this tribally. It's possible to be a right wing libertarian who's against military spending (think Ron Paul) just like it's possible to be left wing and pro-military (think Obama and the Clintons). The fact that right wing free market absolutism contradicts being in favor of defense spending is only an issue if you're a free market absolutist, which not a lot of people are.
/r/TheRedPill26/06/18 04:01 PM
2

Our defense budget is about half of our discretionary spending, which is about a third of our overall budget. So about 1/6 of the US budget goes to overall defense. Keep in mind that the absolutely necessary National Guard and FEMA are considered forms of homeland security, and therefore make up a substantial portion of that defense budget. Also keep in mind the numerous invention to come out of military R&D, like the internet and satellite navigation, both of which make up huge swaths of our ec…
/r/TheRedPill26/06/18 03:31 PM
3

The right spends their (un-fucking godly amounts of) tax money on war Is it still 2006? The amount of tax revenue spent on war is minuscule compared to the amount of tax revenue spent on social services, even during Republican administrations. About 2/3 of our annual budget is dedicated to social security and medicare.
/r/TheRedPill26/06/18 07:48 AM
2

His 5 great novels are all worth reading. Notes from Underground, The Idiot, Crime and Punishment, Demons, and The Brothers Karamazov. Karamazov is his masterpiece, but also his longest and most challenging work. You can read Notes from Underground in just a couple days, so that's a good place a to start.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/18 12:40 AM
1

You keep vacillating between "of course knowledge is good" and "no one gives a fuck about your knowledge." I get that there's a distinction between using cultural knowledge as a signifier of class and education, and using knowledge quietly for your own material and/or social benefit. My point is that seeking cultural knowledge doesn't just aid the former use, it can also benefit the latter as well. Literature is empathy training, which is invaluable in our less social social media age. Not to ge…
/r/TheRedPill20/06/18 08:38 AM
5

I can just tell that your conception of what women want is based on interacting almost entirely with white trash. If you agree with OP's notion that knowledge is a sort of power in itself, then why are your panties all twisted about him telling people to focus on acquiring knowledge? I get that OP is one of those insufferable guys who saw Idiocracy once and thinks we're headed towards some sort of cognitive decline because supposedly brilliant people like him aren't breeding, but the core of his…
/r/TheRedPill20/06/18 07:49 AM
2

Girls do get wet if you can play Bach on piano or can quote Keats from memory though. A lot of people don't distinguish between nerdy scientific knowledge and cultural knowledge. Cultural knowledge is absolutely sexually valuable.
/r/TheRedPill20/06/18 06:02 AM
9

Being a computer nerd might not help you get laid, but it does help you get a high status job which is attractive to some women. Being cultured, on the other hand, (i.e. have a good understanding of art and literature) absolutely does make you more attractive to a lot of women. Also, IQ is a perfectly legitimate measure of intelligence. Stephen Hawking was a smart guy, but psychometrics wasn't his area of expertise.
/r/TheRedPill20/06/18 05:59 AM
42

Don't minimize the importance of fiction. Not only is literary fiction more intellectually-stimulating than the vast majority of popular non-fiction, it also gives you a better understanding of the subtleties of human interaction than almost anything else. Reading Dostoevsky is like getting a degree in psychology, and reading Tolstoy is like getting a degree in sociology.
/r/TheRedPill20/06/18 05:34 AM
10

Short men actually make less money and suffer pretty substantial workplace discrimination. Accepting preferences is all you can do when it comes to dating, but there's a real place for a public discourse when it comes to height discrimination against men in every other domain of life. If a tall guy is more likely to be hired than a short guy given identical qualifications, then telling the person being discriminated against to "harden up" is bullshit. Those people have a right to complain. Datin…
/r/TheRedPill11/06/18 10:59 AM
7

Very few of the great men of the past are remembered for their sexual conquests. We venerate virgins like Isaac Newton more than random 17th century chads who got syphilis from fucking too many debutantes. Ultimately a man's historical worth is determined by what he accomplishes, not by how attractive he is to women. And don't think that this is an ugly man cope; accomplishing something great is much more difficult than fucking a variety of different women. It's not a cope, it's making sure that…
/r/TheRedPill06/06/18 12:25 AM
1

There's a clear line between a display of emotional intelligence and an emotional dump. The former elicits empathy, the latter disgust. Reading literary fiction does help one navigate difficult social questions and gain some degree emotional intelligence.
/r/TheRedPill25/05/18 07:35 AM
12

A kind action is a kind action regardless of whether or not the person doing it has a personality that can be described as "kind." Actions are what define people, not thoughts. The person in OP's screenshot is just a desperate 41 year old virgin wondering, as he's becoming middle age, why being virtuous didn't get him any attention from women.
/r/TheRedPill24/05/18 11:07 PM
29

lol that's such BS. Niceness as a sexual strategy doesn't invalidate itself. If you donate money to a charity that money doesn't suddenly stop helping people because you donated it for the wrong reasons. The effects of kindness aren't retroactively undone because part of the reason you were kind was to get laid. Painting nice men as manipulative is just a way women justify not being attracted to nice men.
/r/TheRedPill24/05/18 10:10 PM
3

Dostoevsky's books are long, but his language is straightforward and unpretentious. He's very easy to read. Crime and Punishment will definitely fuck you up if you read it properly. Read Demons and Notes from Underground too.
/r/TheRedPill02/05/18 09:13 AM
8

Read more fiction. Especially classic, canonical fiction. One's purpose in life is something people have been grappling with for millennia, and no one here is going to give you a better answer than Shakespeare or Dostoevsky.
/r/TheRedPill02/05/18 05:53 AM
14

There are traits that appeal to all women, but there's no single trait that appeals to all women over and above everything else. It's a combination of looks, status, strength, charm, style, and intelligence. And what concoction works best depends on the woman.
/r/TheRedPill02/05/18 05:47 AM
7

your friends that are girls are not really taking you seriously until they watch you pick up another hot, attractive woman, slam her good- and then return yourself to her friendly girl company for value of friendship alone. That's the source of OP's alienation, and I don't think it's illegitimate. I understand the woman's perspective on this, which is that this guy is probably hanging out with me because he wants to fuck me but is too weak to come out and say it. But the male perspective, which …
/r/TheRedPill27/04/18 08:54 PM
1

In other words, men have to find the perfect middle ground or can be criticized on feminist grounds for falling too far on to the emotionally-reliant side, or too much on the stoic side. Men have to be perfect.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/18 02:31 AM
11

This is a very false equivalence. It's much more socially acceptable for women to complain about traits that they're selected for sexually than it is for men to do the same in mainstream publications. Random manosphere sites aren't as respected and widely-read as Buzzfeed is, for example.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/18 02:20 AM
14

Sort-of realistic VR is gonna fuck us up, but if VR ever gets to the point where it's sensorially indistinguishable from real life, then it's probably going to just end up replacing real life. That could be utopia, I don't know. Or it could be the actual apocalypse.
/r/TheRedPill25/03/18 03:41 PM
62

The saddest part is how pop-feminism exploits female alienation for its own political agenda. The same way the alt-right exploits atomized and lonely men for its agenda. There are a lot of lonely, broken people out there right now.
/r/TheRedPill25/03/18 11:20 AM
101

Atomization is the issue of our time, and I think the internet's to blame. Social media doesn't just keep people from socializing in real life, it gives them an impression of other people's lives that's inaccurately positive. It also turned everyone into an obnoxious political dogmatist who views all of life through the prism of their pet ideology, whether it be feminism, white nationalism, critical race theory, etc. On top of that the meat market of online dating alienates both women (who can't…
/r/TheRedPill25/03/18 11:09 AM
5

It's literally a combination of both. It's not like a guy who's a 10 on the status scale but a 1 on the looks scale in drowning in pussy. But 8/10 actors and musicians get more women obsessing over them than 10/10 male models.
/r/TheRedPill17/03/18 04:51 AM
7

I'm angry. I'm fucking fuming reading that. They would rather have his kids perceive him as a deadbeat dad who abandoned them than know the truth. Society takes every opportunity it gets to alienate men, and then wonders why men lash out and commit violence.
/r/MGTOW14/03/18 12:10 AM
23

This is the most disgusting thing i've read in a long time. It's the sort of nonsense that makes you wish you lived on a different continent with a different culture.
/r/TheRedPill13/03/18 11:30 PM
-1

Let's be honest, aggressive, "needy" sexual attention can be acceptable in highly attractive men. Do you think they perceive Christian Grey as "needy" when he gives a speech about how he can't live without his woman, or do they perceive it as romantic? Being indifferent as an affectation is a way of faking value, but men with genuine value have the leeway to be lustful and romantic.
/r/TheRedPill22/02/18 09:47 PM
10

Not just white males, Asian, Arab, and Hispanic men don't have a future either. Non-white women tend to gravitate towards successful white men on dating sites. Black men still receive some cultural sympathy, but they have their own problems with police and fatherlessness.
/r/TheRedPill19/02/18 11:40 PM
2

When you read a book you're not just reading a description of events, you're reading a narrator's or protagonist's thoughts. In a lot of modernist literature you get to read the particular thought processes that lead them to those thoughts, while in film you're just watching the end result of those thoughts on an actor's face. So literature is a much closer representation of how human beings think than film is. Just read Moby-Dick or In Search of Lost Time and imagine how much depth would have t…
/r/TheRedPill09/02/18 11:26 PM
2

A book represents human thought; a movie is a series of pictures of actors pretending that they're thinking human thoughts. You can't compare the two media at all.
/r/TheRedPill09/02/18 07:20 AM
3

Fiction is everything. It's not like watching a movie or playing a videogame. Good literature, particularly modernist literature, is almost a 1-to-1 representation of human thought, and it dramatizes how that thought would function in a lifelike setting. It's like emotional batting practice. I've read hundreds of books in my life, and I've learned way more from fiction than from reading non-fiction. There's more redpill truth in a good 19th century novel than in most books pushed by the manosphe…
/r/TheRedPill09/02/18 07:18 AM
1

Zimbardo talks about the role pornography plays in the decline of boys as well. If you can get an infinite variety of sexual stimulation whenever you want as a boy, why bother going to that party and risk rejection? If this happens enough in your formative teenage years, you end up developing a personality that isn't conducive to good social interaction.
/r/TheRedPill05/02/18 10:53 PM
1

This is generally the case, but I do think that exceptional intelligence or creativity can be attractive in a partner. I'd probably date a 7/10 with a PhD in physics who works at the large hadron collider over an 8/10 useless idiot. But a 9/10 is datable even if she has an IQ of 85.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/17 08:53 PM
1

Calling someone "alpha" is basically a roundabout way of saying that they exhibit dominant traits, and being in the top 0.1% in terms of height is an example of a dominant trait. You can't claim that your boyfriend is beta when he has a trait that makes him more physically commanding that 99% of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/17 07:35 PM
1

The real question is what is the importance of height in attractiveness. Like would you rather date a 5'7" guy with a 9/10 face or a 6'4" with a 6/10 face? Asking whether or not a woman prefers a tall guy is like asking a guy whether or not he prefers big tits. A few guys will say no, but they're rare.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/17 11:40 AM
2

Life is absolutely not a free market economy. There's a large redistribution of wealth from men to women that alters sexual relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/17 11:25 AM
3

If you're not bullshitting and you are actually able to pull that without any work on your presentation, imagine what working out and dressing well will actually do for you. I don't get people who don't take care of their looks at all. You're deliberately limiting yourself.
/r/TheRedPill09/08/17 07:25 AM
2

You don't seem that ugly. I'm as vertically challenged as you are, but I did pretty well before I got depressed and went NEET for a bit. As long as you aren't very fat, a literal midget, or a disgusting unhygienic pig, social skills and good frame will always be the barrier between no pussy and occasional pussy. Regular high-quality pussy does require looks and game though. Let's not pretend otherwise.
/r/TheRedPill09/08/17 05:28 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter