TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

JonnyRichter Archive

View 3 posts and 272 comments by JonnyRichter on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

They actually didn’t give her any power. She deluded herself into thinking that until Twitch said nah.
/r/MensRights25/05/20 07:46 AM
63

I really hate that people make me defend him, but he’s not “self-proclaimed”. He specifically stated that he’s NOT a Nazi.
/r/MensRights10/01/20 01:33 PM
26

Next time I go I’ll bring back 100% undeniable proof.
/r/MensRights02/01/20 07:29 AM
31

Habit Burger is like this so I can confirm this shit is real.
/r/MensRights02/01/20 07:25 AM
1

I feel like schools should put more emphasis on just how much stronger boys are than girls.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/10/19 07:53 AM
2

This is what happens when the state controls an industry.
/r/MensRights10/09/19 12:17 AM
1

Joker became evil after his wife was killed.
/r/MensRights09/09/19 03:27 AM
10

They usually are.
/r/MensRights08/09/19 02:23 AM
35

There's already a shit ton of outcry for things women do willingly.
/r/MensRights28/08/19 09:34 AM
0

When did I say it had?
/r/MensRights16/08/19 01:05 AM
0

Free market capitalism is built around self-benefit at the hands of voluntary exchange. The idea that I know what’s best for me and you know what’s best for you and fuck anyone who tries to say differently. So no, no like free market capitalism. Try again.
/r/MensRights16/08/19 12:25 AM
0

The path to hell is paved with good intentions.
/r/MensRights15/08/19 11:01 PM
0

Stalin was leftism in practice. You guys never take responsibility for your bad ideas put into action.
/r/MensRights15/08/19 05:48 PM
0

Nothing bad is ever left wing right
/r/MensRights15/08/19 04:32 AM
2

It’s amazing there’s an entire sub devoted to shitting on people who don’t want to be extreme to one end.
/r/MensRights15/08/19 03:46 AM
1

So, far left then.
/r/MensRights15/08/19 03:44 AM
1

The tiniest bit of critical thinking would lead you to also question how we would possibly convince people to also want women to be forced to sign up.
/r/MensRights08/08/19 05:11 PM
0

Again, terrible position to take. Punishing the most amount of people possible to prove a point only hurts the innocent.
/r/MensRights07/08/19 10:49 AM
2

I’m sure The United States of America will be just fine in the next world war considering we have the most powerful military in the world without having to enact the draft.
/r/MensRights07/08/19 05:57 AM
-2

What a strange position to take: “No one won’t have to do it until everyone has to do it.”
/r/MensRights07/08/19 12:01 AM
3

And you still have to pay into the social security that you won’t get.
/r/MensRights06/08/19 11:34 PM
9

Hopefully never. We should be advocating no one signing up, not everyone signing up.
/r/MensRights06/08/19 11:32 PM
0

Because he’s just like the rest of them.
/r/MensRights31/07/19 03:03 AM
8

Yeah I don’t get it either. It qualifies for the exact point of that sub.
/r/MensRights15/07/19 07:16 AM
1

You should stop while you only sound somewhat desperate.
/r/MensRights14/07/19 10:36 AM
1

Weird flex but ok
/r/MensRights14/07/19 08:30 AM
1

I am highly doubtful.
/r/MensRights14/07/19 06:35 AM
1

That’s still no
/r/MensRights14/07/19 12:21 AM
0

So no then.
/r/MensRights13/07/19 11:55 PM
-4

I’m not claiming it’s right. I’m explaining the mindset. And I’m pretty sure FGM is much more detrimental than male circumcision. Do you have any sources on the prevalence of FGM in Africa or the reason for doing it?
/r/MensRights13/07/19 06:21 AM
2

My body, my choice, right?
/r/MensRights13/07/19 06:17 AM
2

Literally some dogs are better off with a removed tail because they wag it so hard they injure it. But I get where you’re coming from.
/r/MensRights13/07/19 06:16 AM
2

I honestly never have heard anyone bring it up outside this sub.
/r/MensRights13/07/19 06:15 AM
0

For me it’s the norm where I am. I understand being against it but most girls here would be weirded out by an uncut penis. One of my best friends even got his done in his 20s cause he was tired of having to explain why it looked different.
/r/MensRights13/07/19 06:14 AM
-1

Why did we need a picture of this This picture doesn’t provide any context
/r/MensRights13/07/19 06:13 AM
2

I mean we all fantasized about women like this when we were teens. It’s the adults like her that need to draw the line.
/r/MensRights13/07/19 05:59 AM
-10

Jesus. With a face like that why did she need to go after a 13 year old... She just lost the best years of her life.
/r/MensRights13/07/19 05:55 AM
1

No, Jesus Christ can you fucking read? I’m saying businesses are not dumb. They don’t think women are less profitable because they have people whose sole jobs are to figure out how profitable their staff is. In other words, no matter what point they’re are trying to make, it is refuted.
/r/MensRights13/07/19 12:03 AM
1

Refuting the exact point being made isn’t related? This is an incredibly strange version of moving the goalposts.
/r/MensRights12/07/19 08:20 PM
2

I’m telling you that your re-interpretation of the argument has a counterpoint, which I have refuted.
/r/MensRights12/07/19 09:31 AM
3

I can’t believe you wasted so much effort to completely miss that I addressed your concern. Yes, the pro-wage gap people think women are underpaid despite producing proportional output because of some shit assessment that women don’t produce as well as men. I am telling you they are wrong. Because the idea that businesses inaccurately assess the value of a woman vs a man is entirely absurd. They have entire departments devoted to assessing an employee’s input vs output. And to think they would a…
/r/MensRights12/07/19 09:11 AM
2

I made a whole point about how accountants are able to figure that shit out but okay just go ahead and ignore that.
/r/MensRights12/07/19 08:21 AM
3

Uh... no. The assertion is that women are getting paid less for the same work. The reality is they are not, be it hours worked, job risk, needed education and experience etc. If it really were the same work, a business’s numbers wouldn’t lie and it would take very little time for accountants to find out that women are more profitable employees.
/r/MensRights12/07/19 07:58 AM
7

You should not trust all men, correct. You should trust people who haven’t proven themselves untrustworthy. It seems you missed what they were implying.
/r/MensRights05/07/19 01:17 AM
1

Lol you said you have a plan. I’m telling you you don’t. God you’re dense.
/r/MensRights27/06/19 02:14 AM
1

Complaining on the internet isn’t much of a plan. But if it makes you feel fulfilled, I won’t stop you.
/r/MensRights26/06/19 05:40 PM
1

I’m sorry, who are you again? Afraid I forgot about this conversation.
/r/MensRights26/06/19 12:18 PM
1

Well you’re certainly more self-aware now.
/r/MensRights26/06/19 11:03 AM
1

You talk about us all the time but we don’t even think about you.
/r/MensRights26/06/19 10:43 AM
0

Why is it that whenever someone tries to explain why it’s done, you troglodyte fucks come out of the woodwork to try and convince them that they’re monsters who enjoy destroying baby penises? This is why you’re not taken seriously.
/r/MensRights26/06/19 10:00 AM
0

Yes there is an issue to be solved. That is why kids get braces. And 99.9% of the time, it's purely cosmetic. And that's not goalpost moving at all. All factors with regards to circumcision must be considered. You asked what the difference is, and that's part of it. Well, it is, based on what you previously required as a reason to not alter a kid's body. Any response to Earp's presentation? It's worth watching. Yeah, it's my previous comments. Almost everybody feels that the change to their body…
/r/MensRights26/06/19 06:35 AM
1

Here's a great idea, how about before you have sex or show your dick to he. Just get circumcised if you really want to? Why force it on a fucking baby? I have a friend who did just that actually. He's happier now that girls aren't weirded out by it after years of them being so. Would have been better if he had done it when there was less to remove.
/r/MensRights26/06/19 05:02 AM
0

In orthodontics there is an actual issue to be solved. Tooth misalignment could have varying effects with eating, jaw alignment, and dental hygiene. Let's not be dishonest and pretend that's why we get our kids braces. Second, braces do not remove any body tissue Classic goalpost moving.
/r/MensRights26/06/19 05:00 AM
0

See this? This is me not reading the second half of your comment because of how ridiculous you sound.
/r/MensRights26/06/19 04:01 AM
-3

Whatever you say
/r/MensRights26/06/19 04:00 AM
0

/r/iamverybadass /r/iamkindabadass
/r/MensRights26/06/19 03:50 AM
0

No one will ever take you seriously the way you argue.
/r/MensRights26/06/19 01:07 AM
-1

Substantive would mean referring to actual evidence, which you did not. Feel free to cite a study performed by a government agency or respected academic journal, like the NIH. L fucking oh L adjective /ˈsəbstən(t)iv,səbˈstan(t)iv/ having a firm basis in reality and therefore important, meaningful, or considerable. "there is no substantive evidence for the efficacy of these drugs" You: “substantive means evidential evidence hurr durr.” So your idea that it’s wise to circumcise your infant son I w…
/r/MensRights25/06/19 09:54 AM
0

You’re on r/MensRights. If you’re not going to respond substantively then don’t respond at all. Okay but I did so I’m not sure what point you think you just made. Telling me how some women prefer circumcised penises when you know that some women also prefer uncircumcised hardly amounts to a “practical” reason to force your son into a risky and unnecessary cosmetic medical procedure. Some women prefer fat men but the overwhelming majority of women prefer fit men, which is why you decide their die…
/r/MensRights25/06/19 08:50 AM
-4

I never said anything about a cleaner penis but if you live in the US and have had sexual interactions with a girl then it is a lot less embarrassing and awkward if it’s what they expect. I’m not saying it’s right that we’ve gotten to that point but that’s just how it is. So by not circumcising your son you are making them the first generation of awkwardness to fix MGM. Do that if you want but... I don’t think I could if I ever felt the need to put more lives on this planet.
/r/MensRights25/06/19 08:32 AM
0

Yeah totally convenient that it only applies to reality.
/r/MensRights25/06/19 08:27 AM
0

Does that apply everywhere and at every time or is this conveniently the only time and place where this argument is ok to use? Of course it’s geographically and chronologically relevant. That’s literally the question that was asked wtf? Lol Because I really hope you don't think "It's ok that I have slaves, the others do too" is an ok argument. Ah yes, slavery is the same as snipping some skin off to make sure the kid doesn’t feel awkward in front of a girl he likes. Also the Holocaust is a good …
/r/MensRights25/06/19 07:42 AM
-8

There is no practical reason for circumcision Just because you don’t consider the reasons practical doesn’t mean they’re not. Sorry.
/r/MensRights25/06/19 07:37 AM
1

Thank you for the laugh.
/r/MensRights25/06/19 05:41 AM
0

You are dumber than a sack of dildos.
/r/MensRights25/06/19 05:21 AM
0

Also great bait to bring out the deranged like you from their holes with your "knives of fallacy" ready :) If it bothers you to be called out for making a fallacy, then practice arguing points without making fallacies. You have no idea what the person you replied to's position on the border camps is. By making the statement you did, you could be proving their point, and all they would have to do is say "the border camps are not concentration camps, because within context, concentration camps ref…
/r/MensRights25/06/19 04:57 AM
0

You are arguing a point that was never relevant to the conversation. Congratulations, you’re stupid in two ways.
/r/MensRights25/06/19 04:09 AM
-1

When that’s the norm where you are and your sex life will be more awkward if you don’t because girls aren’t used to seeing them uncircumcised.
/r/MensRights25/06/19 03:55 AM
1

Is that the norm in your country?
/r/MensRights25/06/19 03:54 AM
0

This is objectively a strawman.
/r/MensRights25/06/19 03:53 AM
-5

That’s always a disclaimer. Driving to work has a risk of death.
/r/MensRights25/06/19 03:52 AM
0

California born and raised. Not sure where you got that conspiracy theory.
/r/MensRights16/06/19 03:00 AM
0

None of that is based in reality.
/r/MensRights15/06/19 03:37 PM
0

That statement still makes zero sense.
/r/MensRights15/06/19 12:53 PM
1

Okay and that’s a conversation worth having. But WHAT does that have to do with birth rates?!
/r/MensRights15/06/19 11:52 AM
1

Whether or not we “need” more migrants is a moot point but that aside, it’s irrelevant to the question of if they should be allowed to come and completely out of place in a discussion of birth rates being diminished by the feminist agenda.
/r/MensRights15/06/19 06:23 AM
1

Lol dude I’m not the one who said low birth rates is bad because immigration.
/r/MensRights15/06/19 04:16 AM
1

And there it is. By the way my family immigrated here from Argentina in ‘65 and I’ve lived in central California ever since.
/r/MensRights15/06/19 01:55 AM
1

I’m just asking you to justify your position. I didn’t open with a strawman, you led me to it by not answering the question - twice. And you’re obviously backing out now because you realized whatever answer you give will be either xenophobic or flat-out stupid.
/r/MensRights15/06/19 12:41 AM
2

Plenty of people want immigration wtf are you talking about.
/r/MensRights14/06/19 11:41 PM
0

If that’s a strawman I would like to hear your reasoning for how A led to B and how either one is a bad thing. You have yet to answer that question, Sean.
/r/MensRights14/06/19 11:40 PM
-2

So low birth rates are bad because poor people will seek a better life......?
/r/MensRights14/06/19 11:13 PM
2

Okay that still doesn’t answer the question at all.
/r/MensRights14/06/19 10:51 PM
4

Uh... what’s wrong with lowering the birth rate?
/r/MensRights14/06/19 09:48 PM
1

This confused me more than anything. “I don’t need a man” doesn’t devolve into an infant saying “I don’t want to be a man.” My mom shut my dad out when I was 2 and here I am today, a strong self-reliant man. And if I interpreted that wrong, well, that’s ‘cause it makes no sense.
/r/MensRights09/06/19 04:47 AM
1

Because they think it’ll make actual victims hesitant to come forward.
/r/MensRights07/06/19 12:42 AM
8

That first sentence. I’ve never met a women who wasn’t on the same page with regard to this kind of abuse. It’s a case of the the loudest ones also being the most ignorant ones. The rest of your comment though.... I hope there are women in your life you think about before you judge an entire gender for the actions of a few.
/r/MensRights03/06/19 02:54 AM
3

I think she’s also the OBGYN.
/r/MensRights30/05/19 07:23 AM
-3

I mean with FGM they remove more than the skin. It would be like snipping off the actual penile head.
/r/MensRights30/05/19 07:01 AM
1

I think you got that sentence mixed up.
/r/MensRights30/05/19 07:00 AM
2

I would have guessed more. Like all of the rights.
/r/MensRights30/04/19 03:34 AM
7

When it was becoming obvious it would be one of those two I remember being in physical pain.
/r/MensRights20/11/18 06:55 AM
16

And now Jimmy is a pussy.
/r/MensRights20/11/18 06:52 AM
1

Okay I’m gonna leave this conversation now. But I appreciate you proving my point.
/r/MensRights08/11/18 07:45 PM
1

Yeah I read my own comment. The one where I said I don’t want to have this discussion cause MR has a track record of not being reasonable with this topic. No where did I say there is no argument so I appreciate steering away from strawmen.
/r/MensRights08/11/18 04:39 PM
1

Did you not read the comment you replied to?
/r/MensRights08/11/18 04:02 PM
1

Yeah how dare someone like themselves for the way they are! They should prefer to be what you think is best!
/r/MensRights08/11/18 04:01 PM
1

Bro, I'm circumcised. Holy shit. Thanks for proving me right.
/r/MensRights08/11/18 12:57 AM
1

I’ve been a regular here for years. I don’t have to agree with everything you do in order to be an advocate of the movement in general.
/r/MensRights07/11/18 08:48 PM
1

I really don’t feel like getting into a circumcision debate because people like you have no desire to be reasonable.
/r/MensRights07/11/18 07:41 PM
1

Yeah I’ve been circumcised too. But I didn’t do it myself as an adult.
/r/MensRights07/11/18 07:09 PM
1

I'm so glad I was born in the 20th century...
/r/MensRights07/11/18 06:12 AM
1

Yeah I’m so bothered being downvoted by morons.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/11/18 01:59 PM
-2

Edgy.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/11/18 01:56 AM
-2

That’s probably the worst use of that meme I’ve ever seen. And I wasn’t pretending anything. I was playing semantics, dumbass.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/11/18 01:43 AM
-10

To fuck with you.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/11/18 01:00 AM
-13

No one here claimed it was.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/11/18 12:47 AM
-14

He knows it’s a water gun.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/11/18 12:35 AM
10

I'm sure they mean half a workday of 8 hours.
/r/MensRights17/09/18 06:24 AM
10

Not... the right choice of words..
/r/MensRights13/09/18 04:08 AM
1

FGM only happens in certain shitty parts of the world anyway. Male circumcision is a common practice.
/r/MensRights30/08/18 01:19 AM
6

Pokémon.
/r/MensRights16/08/18 11:31 PM
3

Lol wat. So they still get your money but reduce their costs and you suffer a little.
/r/MensRights15/06/18 06:15 AM
2

Is it Habit Burger? They do this at every location I’ve seen.
/r/MensRights15/06/18 06:15 AM
3

women
/r/MensRights25/11/17 02:50 AM
1

Oh please enlighten me on the "realities of the situation."
/r/MensRights31/10/17 10:44 PM
1

It's weird that you're confused on why your being arrested depends on the specific cop that stops you.
/r/MensRights31/10/17 07:42 AM
6

I feel bad that you put all that effort into missing the fact that the cop is the first and most determining factor with which your fate is decided.
/r/MensRights31/10/17 07:18 AM
2

I think it's from a skit where the storyteller gets kicked out of the bar. Also, last call.
/r/MensRights31/10/17 04:08 AM
45

It really depends on the cop.
/r/MensRights30/10/17 08:21 PM
222

Yeah except in the US that doesn't matter cause men have been put on the SP list for peeing in a park while drunk.
/r/MensRights30/10/17 08:11 PM
2

They did point out that one point refutes another but they also never claimed they themselves were refuting it, just pointing out how bad it is. Not their fault everyone upvoted it.
/r/MensRights25/10/17 09:18 PM
14

Getting paid to have sex does sound enticing at first. But like anything else, once you're a pro at something that's when you start to hate it.
/r/MensRights22/10/17 01:47 AM
2

Just sent this to my friend who's Mexican but was born here. His response: "She's right."
/r/MensRights07/09/17 02:20 AM
3

Just because being an asshole is legal doesn't mean you should defend assholes.
/r/MensRights06/08/17 12:03 AM
12

Women's razors are a different product than men's razors. This cafe is charging more for the same product based on the gender of the customer.
/r/MensRights06/08/17 12:02 AM
-1

Nothing you said has anything to do with Libertarianism.
/r/MensRights04/08/17 11:51 PM
-6

What are you smoking
/r/MensRights04/08/17 08:35 PM
1

Yeah I'm gonna be pedantic because that was quite possibly in the top 10 for most retarded replies I've ever seen.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 05:06 PM
2

Being middle aged doesn't make you half dead. That's retarded.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 03:25 AM
1

half dead Wat Wat ....wat
/r/MensRights23/07/17 03:01 PM
0

Ah yes, science. I know him well.
/r/MensRights23/07/17 03:00 PM
-3

I mean.... presumably it's because of what she can do pre-vaginal insertion. Also, 40 isn't that old.
/r/MensRights23/07/17 10:53 AM
-5

The idea is that a 40 year old woman is more willing to experiment than a 25 year old. Whereas men have a higher sex drive in their 20s than 40s.
/r/MensRights23/07/17 10:49 AM
14

I know a 40 year old with a more bangin body than 90% of all girls I met. But she is an anomaly. I only hope to be as motivated as she when I'm her age.
/r/MensRights23/07/17 10:47 AM
3

Everyone makes mistakes.
/r/MensRights11/07/17 05:24 PM
4

[Question] followed by "why do you hate women?" Is a common enough template I think it should be pretty recognizable without explanation.
/r/MensRights11/07/17 05:06 PM
132

Would you like a pink ribbon? No? Why do you hate women?
/r/MensRights11/07/17 01:02 AM
0

Not disputing your point, but the demand for vets has definitely gone up as well. Albeit, not as quickly.
/r/MensRights13/04/17 08:40 PM
1

You reattach your removed hair?
/r/MensRights12/03/17 02:57 AM
-2

We give them hair cuts and clip their nails.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 11:17 PM
1

When the ideology is defined by third wave, yeah. Being opposed to that is not the same as being opposed to women's rights. Stop projecting.
/r/MensRights04/02/17 03:40 AM
1

Because being against the mainstream feminist narrative means you hate women? Way to logic.
/r/MensRights04/02/17 01:21 AM
1

Those sweet people are all in relationships. I think you're forgetting that I just said this behavior is what's normalized and speaking out against it is considered shitty behavior.
/r/MensRights27/01/17 11:48 PM
1

The people who post this stuff otherwise sweet, sane people. I'm saying that it has been accepted in today's world that this is empowerment instead of just delusional.
/r/MensRights27/01/17 06:34 PM
5

I know plenty of people personally who post things on Facebook and instagram that support the narrative you are denying happens. Yet I don't know a single guy who would post anything to call them out. Because there is a huge fear that they will be personally attacked for doing so. It's real. This is the time we live in now; where anti-Feminism is inherently misogynist.
/r/MensRights27/01/17 07:13 AM
1

Huge overlap.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 09:04 AM
0

No. You're the awful person for being in support of something where innocent people have to pay for their damages caused by fucking animals. Kaepernick's protest did way more for the cause and all he did was kneel down. More people support that than fucking destruction. That shit only makes the other side hate you more.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 08:19 AM
1

All the destruction is Washington. https://scontent-sjc2-1.cdninstagram.com/t51.2885-15/e15/16122420_1782541475343245_1214010405005819904_n.jpg?ig_cache_key=MTQzMjA3OTczOTE0MTMxNjU2Ng%3D%3D.2
/r/MensRights22/01/17 07:41 AM
0

That's not how logic works. White supremacy is awful. These protests produce more bad than good. Being in support of something and going out and marching and blocking traffic, and ultimately creating destruction are completely different.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 07:40 AM
-1

http://www.fox5dc.com/news/230409430-story It doesn't matter what percentage it is. If it happens then the protests are a failure. There's a right and wrong way to do it. What we're seeing now is wrong.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 07:08 AM
0

Peaceful protests are one thing. I support kaepernick for his. These are not peaceful.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 07:07 AM
2

Thank you. It doesn't take being a man to see how awful it is to say death is ever less bad than feelings.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 06:46 AM
-1

Are you? Smashing windows is not in the first amendment. And just because something is a protected right does not make it an okay thing to do. I'm sure you were totally supportive of people protesting Obama.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 04:45 AM
1

Dunno if you're being sarcastic but that's actually a good point. My aunt started to be a huge Clinton supporter after she met her and they took a picture together.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 04:22 AM
1

She literally said that men dying isn't as important as the feelings of women. Where have you been? But of course Donald Trump said that celebrities can get away with grabbing a groupie's vagina. So he's clearly a sexist rapist.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 04:20 AM
3

"Women are the real victims of war." Let's not forget she actually believes the death of men isn't as important as the feelings of women.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 04:17 AM
-2

Yeah. They should be convenient by not happening. "Fuck working people because my feeeeeeels."
/r/MensRights22/01/17 04:05 AM
1

My roommate's favorite word is "dingus". Are you him?!
/r/MensRights22/01/17 04:05 AM
1

Obviously I'm blind. Duh. It's weird though, cause I've heard him say plenty of anti-conservative things.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 01:02 AM
-3

Hillary is a sexist too by that standard. There was no way to not elect one.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 12:45 AM
-10

Only problem is protests like this only succeed in impeding on the lives of people trying to go to work. And they always leave destruction in their path.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 12:44 AM
-3

I doubt Piers Morgan is a Trump supporter.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 12:43 AM
20

proper cunt Listen to this man. He's British.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 12:42 AM
-1

Same as the number of women I've had sex with. They've also grabbed my dick.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 12:41 AM
0

You can agree with someone's point even if you disagree with all their other points.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 12:39 AM
2

That doesn't look like a joke to me, it looks like an assumption based on probability.
/r/MensRights16/01/17 02:14 AM
1

Women have tricked you into unprotected sex with false pregnancy tests multiple times?
/r/MensRights02/01/17 10:55 PM
1

You need someone to teach you how logical fallacies work because you have it backwards. I never made an argument stating you were wrong because of your lack of experience with women. I'm saying based on how paranoid you are that you must not have been in many relationships.
/r/MensRights02/01/17 10:40 PM
1

Somehow I'm confident I have more experience with women than you do.
/r/MensRights02/01/17 10:31 PM
1

Considering the word prank is in there, I'm still going with you're paranoid. Just because I'm not looney doesn't mean I'm suffering from anything.
/r/MensRights31/12/16 01:36 AM
1

You live in a very paranoid world.
/r/MensRights30/12/16 11:43 PM
1

Well then I would hope he's not stupid enough to fall for that obvious ploy.
/r/MensRights30/12/16 05:45 PM
-4

Yeah and there are women who are raped by men everyday. That doesn't mean you need to live in constant fear. The odds are still slim.
/r/MensRights28/12/16 07:10 PM
-4

As much as this sub gets upset about false rape, it sure does seem like you guys are terrified of a woman raping your life.
/r/MensRights28/12/16 05:39 PM
1

I think that would make him an idiot. Even real pregnancy tests can have false positives and it's in your best interest to watch her take a second one.
/r/MensRights28/12/16 05:37 PM
4

lol yeah cause after a couple weeks when he wants an ultrasound, she'll still be able to fool him. This is a prank. If a woman really wanted to temporarily trap a man, she would get a used test from one of her pregnant friends.
/r/MensRights28/12/16 09:48 AM
15

Nah, they laugh and say "you go, girl."
/r/MensRights26/12/16 01:04 AM
3

But equality!
/r/MensRights04/12/16 04:42 AM
13

How the hell is that an iffy example? Men were forced to give their lives. Literally.
/r/MensRights19/11/16 11:13 PM
15

How many women have been forced to go to war?
/r/MensRights19/11/16 10:55 PM
3

That's what I was thinking. It's not slut-shaming, it's cheating-on-your-man-shaming. Also, liar-shaming. No one is saying there's anything wrong with being promiscuous. They're saying it's wrong to take money from someone who isn't biologically responsible.
/r/MensRights02/09/16 05:11 PM
4

How ironic that the writer accuses the government of trying to control something complicated they don't understand, meanwhile having no idea they're defending child support, which is government mandated. "It's messy when government peeks into a bedroom." Yeah no shit, but they're already doing that.
/r/MensRights02/09/16 05:09 PM
2

I don't know how to respond to that. Call me retarded or something.
/r/MensRights01/09/16 07:36 AM
1

The whole premise of this discussion was whether armies are needed or not. I'm the first comment in our chain and this is what I said: "I don't understand this mentality of wanting women to have to sign up. Why not want men to be relinquished instead?" If your assumption is that armies can't exist without a draft, then you've already lost the argument by the shear fact that there are indeed many armies and, as far as I know, currently no active drafts. There is a difference, isn't there? There i…
/r/MensRights01/09/16 07:31 AM
1

Yes, because then you can't come back, where your friends and family may have stayed. And not being legal means you have to avoid getting caught on the way out. So yeah, it absolutely matters.
/r/MensRights31/08/16 10:23 PM
1

Maybe my military speak isn't too good, but why would you have a draft if you don't have an army? I think you were actually confused when you wrote this sentence. I said the whole premise is that there's no draft. There can still be a voluntary military. "one of the countries has no resources" Where did I say that? You said little resources. You wanna get arbitrary? "to take over the most powerful country in the world" Where did I say that? Are we not talking about the US? I thought this whole d…
/r/MensRights31/08/16 05:28 PM
1

Lol The whole premise here is that drafts don't exist and that one of the countries has no resources but you're over here acting like that country somehow has the resources to take over the most powerful country in the world (also that not having a draft somehow translates to no one being willing to defend themselves and no one joining a voluntary military). Those are some special kinds of mental gymnastics.
/r/MensRights30/08/16 04:12 PM
1

You're assuming that in a society without armies that country B would have an army. And that the citizens in country A would just keel over. This is just painful.
/r/MensRights30/08/16 09:03 AM
1

Country A is not doing well and doesn't have good land. Country A, who has little, will be successful in taking country B? Solid logic, champ.
/r/MensRights30/08/16 07:48 AM
2

It's not a choice if it's not legal.
/r/MensRights30/08/16 01:18 AM
2

I should have the option to flee. Doesn't mean I necessarily will, but it's immoral for the country to force me to fight. These silly what-if scenarios accomplish nothing.
/r/MensRights29/08/16 09:20 PM
2

Well I think it's sick to make anyone put their life on the line without any choice. Fucking sick.
/r/MensRights29/08/16 05:53 PM
1

No. They're not. This mentality that they are needed, and should be mandatory, is the only reason they exist.
/r/MensRights29/08/16 05:52 PM
0

I'm all in favor I don't understand this mentality of wanting women to have to sign up. Why not want men to be relinquished instead?
/r/MensRights29/08/16 05:34 AM
1

Your blind patriotism is horrifying.
/r/MensRights18/05/16 04:05 AM
1

You are delusional if you think your "right to liberty" is somehow hurt if I don't register for the draft. I don't owe you a damn thing. Certainly not my servitude.
/r/MensRights18/05/16 04:04 AM
1

You wanna make a difference? Fight for what "Men's Rights" actually means: awarding men with the rights they deserve, not taking from women the rights that they have. Your rights are not hindered by me not being willing to fight a war. "This is not a sub to bitch and complain" That's exactly what you're doing when you post about republicans shooting down your desire to force women to do something against their will. YOU are what's wrong with MRM.
/r/MensRights18/05/16 03:53 AM
1

I thought this sub was about rights. I have the right to not risk my life because of your hunch.
/r/MensRights18/05/16 03:29 AM
-2

Why the fuck is this even a thing? I don't want women to have to register. I want no one to have to register.
/r/MensRights18/05/16 03:03 AM
7

He didn't say that. He said what he believes will be politically plausible.
/r/MensRights09/02/16 07:16 AM
1

It's not the penis itself that makes you stronger, but no one is saying that. Being a man inherently means you have more testosterone, which is what contributes to that greater muscles size and strength.
/r/MensRights14/01/15 07:35 AM
15

And well... And then he became the captain of the Starship Fucking Enterprise and founded a school for gifted children.
/r/MensRights10/01/15 03:01 AM
5

I'm surprised you haven't already seen it. It was all over MR the other day. Point is, it was a faked video meant to show how predatory guys are around drunk girls. When told it was fake, apologists came back with "but it makes a good point!" http://thesmokinggun.com/documents/drunk-girl-viral-hoax-video-785463
/r/MensRights17/11/14 10:32 AM
4

This is exactly what we all said to the Jennifer Box video, right?
/r/MensRights17/11/14 10:03 AM
1

A male with a psychology degree looks like a slacker while a female with a psychology degree looks like a college graduate. This could be, however, I was referring to your 50% statistic about women being more likely to graduate.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 10:09 AM
6

So, what's going on with college and the preference for women is something of Frankenstein to me Assuming everything else you said is true, them taking an easier major may be contributing to why they are more likely to graduate.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 09:42 AM
1

I'm not going to get into this debate with you. The fact is, this argument has been made time and time again and it always ends in a stalemate. It's just too complex an issue for your one sentence to be the end-all of it.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 04:38 AM
13

but still, you have to admit...you're killing something. Probably because that's irrelevant. Disinfecting your countertops is killing living things. It's a tired argument that doesn't need to be made unless you're just trying to annoy them.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 02:04 AM
7

Commas: the difference between "Come on, men." And "Come on men."
/r/MensRights10/09/14 05:28 AM
1

'S TELLIN' ME YEAAAAAAAAAH
/r/MensRights09/09/14 09:07 PM
2

You're missing the point. It's a bullshit civic duty, and no one should be forced to do it. It is not justified in any way for either gender.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 03:41 AM
4

Just because selective service is a constitutional thing doesn't somehow make it right or justified. Fuck my civil duty. I didn't ask to live in this country, nor can I afford to leave.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 11:59 PM
2

Aw, but I like making up new terms!
/r/MensRights14/05/14 09:08 PM
2

Read my reply to altxatu.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 08:21 PM
3

The only reason I wouldn't use the word "beneficial" is because that has a positive connotation, while affirmative action is detrimental to those it specifically does not help. I'm not a sociologist either and I don't think "reverse racism" is even a legitimate term, but if I had to define the difference I would say it's this: Racism: Taxing only white people. Reverse Racism: Giving subsidies to only black people. In both instances, you are targeting a specific demographic, but one is a negative…
/r/MensRights14/05/14 06:54 PM
7

Yes, thank you for explaining that to me.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 04:52 PM
31

I always thought of reverse racism as favoring a particular race; like affirmative action.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 03:34 PM
13

Elementary.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 07:38 PM
16

It also perpetuates the stereotype that Libertarians are pot smoking, teenage, white, atheistic kids with a victim complex.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 06:16 PM
9

Even feminist groups have released studies on the gender gap being a myth. Last time I saw something pay gap-related posted in /r/Feminism, the top comment was talking about how it has been debunked for a long time.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 09:45 PM
1

Economists have given us endless tax cuts for the rich, several recessions and a shitload of South American deathsquads. I sincerely hope this is a joke, lest it be one of the dumbest statements you'll ever look back on later in life and laugh at. Economists don't make tax policy, they don't create booms and busts, and they certainly don't advocate drug wars. How you could possibly put any of that blame on an entire group of researchers is mind-boggling. You might as well blame engineers for eve…
/r/MensRights03/11/13 11:27 AM
4

Because quantitative analysis is a real thing. FFS this lambasting of economics as a science really blows my mind. We have legitimate theories that are peer-reviewed. Are you going to say price theory isn't a thing? Are you going to say the fuck-ton of statistical analysis used to determine that a supply shock makes the price of a commodity skyrocket is just hocus pocus opinion papers? If you don't think the scientific process is conducive to economic studies, then you either haven't taken upper…
/r/MensRights03/11/13 07:37 AM
12

It's for both.
/r/MensRights30/09/13 08:22 PM
1

I figured it was just a typo the first time, but you know the plural of woman is women, right?
/r/MensRights09/09/13 03:04 AM
3

I found this video while taking a gender studies class (which by its own admission was feminist-leaning) and I remembered I had it yesterday. Wasn't sure if you guys had seen it, and reddit didn't notify me that the link had already been submitted so... I had no way of knowing that it's apparently already well known.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 12:42 AM
4

Let's not promote vandalism.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 05:27 PM
2

As I've heard the rebuttal go, when you drive drunk, you're risking the lives of people who were never involved in your day. For sex, the only possible victim is the one drinking because having sex for a woman doesn't require that she actively participate. I dunno, that's just what they say.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 05:23 PM
2

He looks like the kid from The Secret Life of the American Teenager. Not that I've watched that show...
/r/MensRights28/06/13 08:40 PM
24

It was part of the prevented bill, it seems.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 09:33 PM
4

I don't think the golden mean is meant to be applied toward things where the facts are observable and, therefore, known. But certainly it applies to situations in which you have people over/under-exaggerating (depending on their end of the spectrum) because the answer to the question is dependent somewhat on the opinion of a definition. In this case, "rape" and "sexual assault" have different meanings depending on whom you ask.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 07:11 PM
1

Well, if you could possibly insure that you are both: attractive and not unattractive, then you could potentially reduce your cost/benefit ratio to an amount that basically has your investment working for you. Otherwise, expect it to be about half of all your lifetime assets.
/r/MensRights03/06/13 03:24 AM
2

The value is qualitative, not quantitative.
/r/MensRights03/06/13 03:15 AM
63

This photo showed up on my newsfeed today. It's like the only messages we try to send are: Men: Don't be shitty. Women: Avoid shitty men. I can't quite put my finger on what disturbs me about this.
/r/MensRights02/06/13 03:15 PM
3

This is the first I'm hearing of this. Do you have a source?
/r/MensRights01/06/13 10:22 AM
4

In 1974, she met feminist writer and activist John Stoltenberg when they both walked out on a poetry reading in Greenwich Village over misogynist material. They became close friends and eventually came to live together.[30] Stoltenberg wrote a series of radical feminist books and articles on masculinity. Although Dworkin publicly wrote "I love John with my heart and soul"[31] and Stoltenberg described Dworkin as "the love of my life",[32] she continued to publicly identify herself as lesbian, an…
/r/MensRights29/05/13 12:04 AM
2

The world is a cruel, sadistic place.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 01:06 AM
3

However, who can be used as an object pronoun as well. You can get away with it in informal speech. But it's not technically correct.
/r/MensRights16/04/13 08:36 PM
8

Yeah, you can hit all your micros without carbs. Your body doesn't actually need them to function properly. However, your brain sort of depends on them considering it runs on glucose. That's why it's not advised that you do keto for an extended period of time.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 09:46 PM
3

You're typically on the chopping block if your productivity doesn't match the wage increase. In fact, it would be irrational for a company to let you go if your productivity didn't at least match the wage increase. Minimum wage increases are correlated with more unemployment, but only for those who can't cut the mustard.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 11:05 AM
15

1) That intro creeped me out. 2) Her mouth annoys me. 3) I could swear she was looking into my soul. 4) She can't really think anyone would take her seriously. 5) Near-genocide? Does she think this can really be achieved?
/r/MensRights17/01/13 11:53 AM
1

That's weird, because he receives non-obligation financial aid every semester. But when he refused selective service, they told him no SS.
/r/MensRights24/12/12 04:48 AM
1

I'm not arguing with you, just throwing it out there.
/r/MensRights24/12/12 03:01 AM
6

My roommate refused to sign up, and now he won't be able to collect social security.
/r/MensRights24/12/12 02:48 AM
2

I'm pretty sure this is x-posted from a /r/TumblrInAction post. You guys will get a kick out of them. But I'm not sure which are serious and which are satire. http://www.reddit.com/r/TumblrInAction/comments/14ln15/i_need_feminism_because/
/r/MensRights11/12/12 02:26 AM
19

Wasn't it just a few days ago, there was a Dilbert post on our front page we used to make fun of ourselves?
/r/MensRights07/11/12 11:31 AM
2

On any given day, where I live, I am more likely to see a woman's breasts or vagina than a man's penis or even just a shirtless man. You may not have said "daily basis" but that was as little his point as it was yours. The question is more why are you more likely to see breasts and vagina than penis and moobs?
/r/MensRights04/11/12 02:46 AM
0

The more people who have my name, the easier it is to figure out who I am?
/r/MensRights02/11/12 09:35 AM
1

Fortunately, there are very many people by this name.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 09:25 AM
5

If I give you the link, everyone here will be able to see my FB account from my comment, and I'd rather reddit not know that information. Sorry, but this doxxing thing makes me extra cautious.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 05:19 AM
24

"Instead of saying no or entering a fake number, Text Redcross to 90999..." This trick doesn't require that the guy even sees what she's doing, or what number she's put in.
/r/MensRights01/11/12 10:25 PM
38

Usually, I don't comment on companies' Facebook posts, but I couldn't help with this one: Yes, because any guy whom you arbitrarily deem "creepy," and who has summed up the courage to actually ask for your number, automatically deserves this kind of degrading punishment.
/r/MensRights01/11/12 09:48 PM
4

I always found it extremely tacky that her party tries to appeal to its followers through its name.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 01:37 AM
8

"It is impossible, in our society, to have consensual sex." Rape: 2. any act of sexual intercourse that is forced upon a person. "But Dworkin isn't saying all men are rapists." "Our culture is a result of the patriarchy." Do the math.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 01:28 AM
0

No, no, you see, it's unfair because you make 23% more than the woman who works 23% fewer hours than you. How silly of you to make that mistake.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 01:17 AM
2

I didn't strawman you, you said helping people go to college doesn't help unemployment, and you're flat out wrong. Really? Okay, so when I said: "...increasing the supply of college grads actually decreases their individual ability to get a job." You implied that my argument was increasing the general education level doesn't help economic growth; completely missing my point. I agree with you that education is better. No one is arguing that education is bad, but getting more people college degree…
/r/MensRights23/10/12 07:00 AM
2

Anyone who doesn't grow their own food, build their own houses, or knit their own clothes needs business in some way. I'm all for contributing to unemployment insurance, but it needs to be reformed.
/r/MensRights23/10/12 04:03 AM
1

Simply not true. The market works on supply and demand. So, I'm just going to quickly mention that I graduated with an economics degree, so I know very well how this works, and you kind of strawman'd me. I was holding all else constant (ceteris paribus; you may have heard of it) and you changed the other variables. Foreign kids getting our education? My roommates came from Palestine and all they had to do was say they don't have support from their parents. They got a free ride through college wh…
/r/MensRights23/10/12 03:57 AM
1

Create jobs. Tax the people that outsource to China or India so they might manufacture (or w/e) in America. "Although globalization is widely recognized these days, the U.S. economy actually remains relatively closed. The vast majority of goods and services sold in the United States is produced here. In 2010, imports were about 16% of U.S. GDP. Imports from China amounted to 2.5% of GDP." http://www.frbsf.org/publications/economics/letter/2011/el2011-25.html Reduce the cost of university (or the…
/r/MensRights23/10/12 02:23 AM
12

In all honesty, what would you like the government to do to fix unemployment?
/r/MensRights23/10/12 02:05 AM
9

The gym at my university (US) has Ladies Only night for rock climbing. I'll make a post with it in more detail later but is this a violation?
/r/MensRights14/10/12 06:27 AM
1

What benefits is he talking about? WHY DO YOU HATE THE OFFICE!?
/r/MensRights13/10/12 04:19 AM
2

Apparently it's old, and the mother has already been dealt with.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 04:22 AM
21

However, the first line is: Yes. This is inappropriate. They agree, so let's not take one snippet out of context and disregard everything else. We are for men's rights, so we shouldn't alienate those who empathize just because they identify with a group on a different part of the spectrum.
/r/MensRights20/09/12 09:37 PM
0

I'm doing this purely to help you and I promise I'm not trying to be a dick. Who Any reason you used 'whom' or just a slip up? /sincere curiosity
/r/MensRights20/08/12 12:36 AM
1

I'm... I'm not making any decisions. I'm saying what the general decision is/has been.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 08:53 PM
1

I agree. I was just pointing out the "how it is" not "how it should be". People in this thread seem to hate that.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 08:38 PM
-5

Awesome. But kids from my high school days were made fun of for it behind their back. And every girl I asked said they were weirded out by uncircumcised. This shouldn't be unheard of.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 07:20 AM
-9

Well, if you live in the US, the benefit is not getting teased. I'm not trying to justify circumcision as a procedure, but much like foot-binding, you'd rather just do it than try to be a rebel. Edit: This entire thread has turned into a anyone who doesn't shame circumcision should be downvoted. What a joke.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 04:36 AM
1

That's why I asked to which sub you we're referring. I wasn't sure whether you meant the /r/atheism post was bad or that the /r/MensRights post about the /r/atheism post was bad.
/r/MensRights01/08/12 05:10 AM
1

Irrelevant to which sub? It's definitely relevant to /r/atheism, just not well thought-out.
/r/MensRights01/08/12 04:59 AM
1

Because usually a post has to make it pretty far up from the people who vote but don't comment before someone else debunks it.
/r/MensRights01/08/12 04:57 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter