JonstheSquire Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	Depp loses libel case against The Sun newspaper Hearsay is a type of testimony, which is a type of evidence. It is literally called hearsay evidence. It is a type of "oral evidence" under English law. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hearsay https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hearsay_in_English_law	/r/MensRights	03/11/20 01:53 AM
1	Depp loses libel case against The Sun newspaper Testimony is evidence. Text messages are evidence. Videos are evidence. Photographs are evidence.	/r/MensRights	03/11/20 12:21 AM
1	Depp loses libel case against The Sun newspaper DID JUDGE actually SEE/REVIEWED ANY EVIDENCE? Nope. The judge sat through days of testimony and reviewed hundreds of exhibits, then wrote more than 100 pages analyzing the evidence in detail.	/r/MensRights	03/11/20 12:19 AM
-1	Depp loses libel case against The Sun newspaper Yes. For the claims Depp made in this case, it is irrelevant. If the judge finds he hit (beat) Heard, the Sun has a complete defense to libel because what they published is true. Read the judge's opinion. It is good.	/r/MensRights	03/11/20 12:06 AM
3	Depp loses libel case against The Sun newspaper the law protects the press from prior restraint. Not in the UK. It is pretty common in the UK.	/r/MensRights	02/11/20 11:32 PM
-1	Depp loses libel case against The Sun newspaper Hearsay testimony is evidence.	/r/MensRights	02/11/20 11:31 PM
1	Depp loses libel case against The Sun newspaper No one's saying that Heard didn't abuse Depp, but that's not what this case was about. Yeah. It seems Heard even admitted to a lot of what she was accused of.	/r/MensRights	02/11/20 11:29 PM
-9	Depp loses libel case against The Sun newspaper The evidence against Heard was pretty much irrelevant to the case though. The only really question at trial was did Depp ever hit Heard. The judge found that he did.	/r/MensRights	02/11/20 11:28 PM