TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Jonsummerz Archive

View 0 posts and 131 comments by Jonsummerz on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

How is this helpful to anyone, or contributing to the conversation?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/26 03:10 PM
–

Women (and men) will lower their standards only when necessary based on their goals and options, and that makes perfect sense (e.g., if a woman wants kids and feels she is running out of time looking for "the one", she will naturally begin to be accepting of qualities she might have filtered out before, or at least she may put more priority on different qualities like temperament). And that's basically how it's going to stay, regardless of what people say on Reddit
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/26 03:08 PM
–

Blue pill isn't a trend so much as it's the skepticism/denial of a trend
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 04:43 PM
–

Ok, how so? You believe that "looks don't matter" is a tenant of blue pill?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 04:05 PM
–

Point is that the guy in your example drained his account if his own free will Being horny doesn't count as being taken advantage of
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 04:04 PM
–

So you vaguely know about some idiot that, of his own free will, spent all his money on some con artist girl he wasn't married to. And you find that one instance significant?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 03:38 PM
–

The straw man is truly insane. "Looks don't matter"?? Dude nobody thinks that. BP emphasizes having a good personality because we're talking to resentful horny guys. For them, working on their personality is extremely beneficial. Why would blue pill have to explain to you that "attraction matters" if you're not a child?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 03:36 PM
–

I agree she is clearly a horrible person, but your friend sounds like an idiot. Why did he allow this to happen?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 03:16 PM
10

The nice guy you described is likely to be getting a relationship with a nice girl if he has otherwise reasonable standards But he's very different from the guys that often consider themselves "nice"
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 03:05 PM
–

Blue pill doesn't "believe" in a just world fallacy. Everybody knows that a woman generally isn't going to fall for you just because you're "nice" - that's why "nice guy" is literally an insult. And nothing about blue pill says "building attracting isn't important". that is also ridiculous and doesn't require a whole analogy to understand
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 02:56 PM
–

"Used the BP" is just the billions of people not using RP. And yes it has worked billions of times
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 02:53 PM
–

I'm a fellow man and disagree with OP
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 02:51 PM
–

Blockbuster changed because there was a better option. Horny men won't stop paying if it's helping them get their rocks off
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 02:51 PM
–

Yeah this is like saying "we need to stop tipping" except way worse because there's horny men involved.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 02:50 PM
–

Just pay for a coffee date where you learn what you need to. if she's not worth it, cut her off. it's not rocket science
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 02:49 PM
–

Who used you?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 02:48 PM
–

Women in my experience are pretty easy to read when it comes to this. When you offer to pay for the first date, I find that just their reaction tells you a lot about their intentions/gratitude or lack thereof
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 02:47 PM
–

Men could learn a thing or two
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 02:45 PM
–

Same questions
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 02:41 PM
–

Why would that logically follow? You realize how many people want to commit to a regular workout but are unable, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 02:40 PM
–

Blue pill is 1000x better for finding a meaningful relationship
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 02:37 PM
–

Except that chatgpt isn't translating your words. it's taking words from others and regurgitating them
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 02:35 PM
8

You're saying that every study you've ever seen has matched your preconceived conclusions? Don't you find that strange? How do you find your studies?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 02:21 PM
8

How many have you read that disagree with your conclusions?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 02:16 PM
–

Your comparison is the one with no bearing on reality because of the examples you chose. You are downplaying the negative aspects of tate ("moral shortcomings"? Lol) and downplaying (actually almost completely ignoring) the benefits of an average therapist. your description of therapy fundamentally misunderstands what it is, especially the aspects involving actually helping people solve their problems and develop skills. Therapists also often recommend exercise when it makes sense for the indivi…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 02:15 PM
2

I'm blue pill and even i see no logic to what you're saying. the absence of proof that someone is lying doesn't prove they're telling the truth
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 02:05 PM
8

Do you think your bias has something to do with your ignoring studies that don't prove what you want?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 02:03 PM
–

I'm not saying op deserved it in that instance, nor am I saying that no woman has ever been an asshole. If you go to a club (or any similar environment) to try to hit on women for example, I'm sure you'd find some women like that. What im saying is that it doesn't have to be the norm in anyone's life, assuming you aren't actively putting yourself in that type of situation repeatedly.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 01:56 PM
–

You missed a few of Tates qualities LOL And you guys gotta look at therapy reviews or something coz you found the worst ones (or you literally didn't specify to them what you were looking for) (or you're mischaracterizing them)
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 01:47 PM
–

You don't think that a man with improved confidence and ability to accept/not internalize negative feedback will be better with women?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 01:45 PM
–

If you told someone 100 times to get vitamin c when they're on the verge of getting scurvy, then the 101st time might sound like an insult to their ears
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 01:43 PM
–

Cope and stategize on how to improve
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 01:38 PM
–

How does therapy push someone out of dating?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 01:38 PM
–

Most women aren't going to come out and say something like that unless you're being super forward with them and they have to fend you off with their words
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 01:37 PM
–

You've highlighted your ideal internet guru and a cartoonishly bad therapist in order to make your point
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 01:36 PM
–

Because you can see the goalposts being moved in real time
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 05:13 PM
–

> continum of expression I'm glad you agree that it's just you expressing your feelings rather than a real argument
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 01:51 PM
–

So we've gone from: > The fact that he admitted it lables him as redpill and now we're at: > [saying that] womens standards are too high [gets you labeled as redpill] Isn't that an interesting jump?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 12:34 PM
–

Admitted what, to being a virgin? Are you seriously arguing that "redditors" would instantly label any virgin as a red piller, regardless of what they're saying or their flair?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 12:23 PM
–

Normal is communicating openly with your partner about how they want their life to look, both for big picture and daily things, and compromising to find the best way to get their together.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 12:00 PM
–

*only if he's labeled red pill :)
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 11:42 AM
–

See how you moved the goal post from "being upset" to "hiring a prostitute" within one comment?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 11:41 AM
–

I feel that quite deeply lol. Even if there's nothing to do, I often sit on the couch when I have a friend over and just flip through Netflix or whatever. I think I'm a more extreme example though
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/26 09:35 PM
–

I would say that this doesn't qualify as cognitive dissonance unless you believe that *all* men or the vast majority are likely to be bad in the same ways that your exes were. To back that up; cognitive dissonance involves 2 contradictory beliefs/values etc., but the following are not contradictory: 1. "Many men, like my exes, are bad" 2. "I am biologically attracted to men, some portion of which are good and others bad"
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/26 09:31 PM
–

Blue pill is the denial of the red pill, so it doesn't necessarily need its own studies. There's no burden of proof
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/26 06:51 PM
–

> houses that aren't for sale in that percentage. I think my analogy of houses out of your price range is much more analogous; Houses that are not for sale are more like married men or like...celibate monks lol. But in the end we agree that: > the percentage you've narrowed to is actually lower. This is of course true, but just not really an issue for the original comment. Yes, filtering can always be done to a more granular degree. There will be yet more filtering even when you go from 5% to ju…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/26 03:12 PM
–

Here's what happened as I see it: Original comment about filtering to 5% of men so dating is more efficient Reply: Claims that 'you're assuming that 5% like you' (even though 5% obviously is just an estimate anyways and not a real amount of men) Me: No, they're not assuming that* + analogy I have put an asterisk where I disagreed with the whole 'you're making an assumption' claim. You could say that my reply was a bit scant, but so was the comment I'm replying to.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/26 02:56 PM
–

You may have noticed that 25 was the beginning of the range, not the end or even middle. That's because 25 is a common time for women to begin considering their timeline and understand that dating to find "the one" can take several years to accomplish. Waiting until the last minute to consider the options and begin dating seriously can be a recipe for disaster.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/26 02:34 PM
–

That's cool, it's important to be yourself and chase your happiness even when you're outside the norm.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/26 02:32 PM
–

I don't think I'm misunderstanding the statement, I think I'm pointing out that the logical "flaw" that you and the commenter before me are expressing is not inherently an issue with the previous commenter.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/26 02:32 PM
–

> you said "only" first I never used the word "only" but I see you're talking about the original comment, fair enough. That does not constitute moving any "goalposts" - I'm happy to lay out the basic logic: since the vast majority of people marry within their race, it is very likely that people have fairly strong in-group preference for dating on average. Therefore, it is unlikely that anyone with an understanding of society would believe that in-group preference (even strong ones) are automatic…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/26 02:30 PM
–

If you're actively dating to find a serious partner at the age of 75, while participating in Reddit discussions, and especially if you are acting like your experience is relevant to the larger dating culture, then yes - you're ultra rare and legendary for sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/26 01:44 PM
–

Reading sure is hard
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/26 01:39 PM
–

Oh my bad, I meant older only as in 'people who have gone from early dating to potentially dating for marriage, which 25 being the early approximate time that some women start to think about their pregnancy timeline, and/or the early beginning of when their friends start to get engaged
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/26 01:14 PM
–

> your logic assumes that that 5% also wants a relationship with you No it doesn't. If you really need an analogy to understand: If I want to buy a house with a garage, 3+ bedrooms and a fireplace, that doesn't "assume" that all houses in that category are affordable to me. I will have to spend time searching for one that meets a balance between my desires and my budget. I may even have to get a better job, or take out a loan etc. to improve my chances of getting the house I want. Fairly simple …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/26 12:56 PM
–

> I'm reminded of So no - they were pretty clearly not "taking truths" from a TV show, regardless of your personal judgment on that show. > 50% is attractive, 50% is unnatractive. Why would this be the case?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/26 12:53 PM
–

*I don't agree with OP but* Mostly it would impact women who are ready for a serious relationship, especially those starting to think about having a family, approx. 25-35, who cannot find a long term partner that meets their standards, and often those who want kids so they feel they have a limited time window
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/26 12:50 PM
–

The overwhelming majority of people marry within their own race. Nobody with any level of maturity views racial preferences in dating as racist in and of itself.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/26 12:48 PM
–

The overwhelming majority of people marry within their own race, and you somehow think that a racial preference in dating is "strange"?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/26 12:47 PM
2

Thanks again for helping get my questions answered better than the people I'm actually talking to xD
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/26 06:13 PM
14

So your views on women are that your cousin is a shitty life partner?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/26 05:58 PM
2

I think that if a woman doesn't want to go to a dinner party with 80% men, it doesn't prove much of anything about whether men have the freedom or ability to find emotional support
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/26 05:54 PM
2

What observation are you making and what's the importance of it?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/26 05:44 PM
2

Ok so if you and your friends do this, then what's the problem?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/26 05:42 PM
2

Why do you require women to come to your 80% male events? (Or i could be misunderstanding... what is your point?)
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/26 04:30 PM
3

You wouldn't invite your friends to your birthday party or baby shower?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/26 04:29 PM
3

Insane lol. I believe, luckily/hopefully, there will be less and less men like him in new generations. Have you ever dated a guy who turned out to be that level of...whatever that is?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/26 03:54 PM
4

Ah yeah I hear you, I didn't make the connection lol. I do think that's pretty sad tbh. My partner does say that she feels more comfortable and seen with me than with anyone else including her friends, which I cherish. It sucks to imagine going through something like pregnancy and other of life's most difficult challenges with a partner that doesn't fully understand you.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/26 03:44 PM
2

> Is it because she’s your partner or because she’s a woman? My first instinct is to say it's both. That said, every woman I've been friends with has been more in tune with both her own feelings and mine that my male friends. So my limited experience would say that gender is more of a factor overall. > I ask because many women have the exact opposite experience. I'm a little confused what you mean by "opposite" here. It seems like men (at least in my generation and above) are overall less emotio…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/26 03:30 PM
1

Yes it generally is. That said, very few men I know are capable of emotional support the way that my partner is
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/26 03:02 PM
–

I think it's wise to avoid fixation on which gender has it better or worse on an individual basis. The struggles of others shouldn't diminish your own. That said, it's not a "fact" that both genders have precisely the same amount of hardships or anything like that. I highly doubt that's the case, and there's not really a reason to think it would be (because, spoilers, men and women are not the same and society doesn't treat them the same).
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/26 03:00 PM
8

> Seems staged? So its bad when people find a clip funny thats scripted to be funny? This really has nothing to do with the question of whether the reactions to this clip prove something about women's feelings toward men (I personally think it doesn't prove much for reasons others have mentioned like bots and a biased/niche audience) But just the fact that something is scripted doesn't impact anything. For example, if fascism became so popular in America that SNL could get huge laughs just by ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/26 02:19 PM
7

I find it easy to do when I have mutual activities I can do with friends, like D&D or video games. But once those dry up (we get bored of the games etc.), then it becomes more of an active effort to maintain friendships.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/26 02:15 PM
–

These are *claims*. Fixed it for you :)
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/26 02:14 PM
1

Nobody wants to date someone that's gotten rejected a ton...
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/26 10:08 PM
2

I'm not adding. gossiping is a definition of shit talk and that's what I meant. if you want to change my claim for me then I'm not sure there's a point in arguing
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/26 10:07 PM
2

Shit talk means they talk about you behind your back, not just argue with you
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/26 09:20 PM
2

Huh? I never said women wouldn't argue with you about eggs, just that they wouldn't hate you for it. Normal women don't care if you prefer to eat your eggs over easy or over medium, I don't know what you're talking about tbh
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/26 09:14 PM
1

Ok I understand, you're talking about the modern feminist movement (probably online), not the textbook definitions. That's fair. Why is it unrealistic to believe that women should be able to be as promiscuous as men without being shamed? Isn't that what happens for men? Nobody ever said anything negative about me for sleeping around in university.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/26 05:53 PM
1

You want a source on the claim that feminism endorses freedom for women? Or are you asking for evidence to prove a negative? Nobody sane, and no "vast majority" of feminists says anyone is free of all judgements or consequences. You're arguing against a straw man
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/26 05:38 PM
2

You're conflating a bunch different claims without backing them up. Feminists believe women should have the ability to dress how they want, which can be either modest or not modest. Feminism is about freedom - yes. Feminism is about "no accountability"? No. Feminism is against certain forms of sexist judgement, but not all.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/26 05:27 PM
1

That quote is attributed to Socrates, not Plato, who simply wrote the words down, but didn't come up with them Still nothing you're describing is a double standard or really negative in any way
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/26 06:42 PM
1

I think you're talking about a fair exception but not a double standard. An example would be that most people aren't interested in having sex for money. However, many people with that general rule would be pretty happy if you offered them 10 billion dollars to make out with someone they find moderately attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/26 06:02 PM
1

You need women to tell you that attractive men are more attractive and therefore, their romantic advances are more likely to be successful?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/26 05:10 PM
2

It is not remotely hypocritical to be attracted to Jeff Golblum and repulsed by some random guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/26 05:09 PM
1

Who is
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/26 04:53 PM
2

We're talking about feminism overall since you didn't specify in your original claim. If you want to amend your original point to only include specific types of feminism, feel free
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/26 03:09 PM
4

Except none of that is true because the majority of young women are feminists (and probably a minority also believe in feminist values but just don't like/fully grasp the term)
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/26 01:41 PM
1

Well if you're arguing topics like abortion (or for politicians who support bans on it or appointed judges who repealed RvW) then it makes sense that many women would dislike you after finding out your views. I doubt that any normal woman would hate or shit talk you just for being part of an argument about the best way to cook an egg
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/26 01:03 PM
6

It's not inherently hypocritical. The standard is basically "you can look at me but don't ogle" and "you can make a first move and then wait to see if I reciprocate. if I do, then proceed. otherwise back off"
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/26 12:26 PM
2

But is that assertion valid? or is he just seeing a subset of feminists (the loud ones and the ones who post a lot on socials) who are also more likely to be ok showing off their body in some circumstances
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/26 12:25 PM
4

In today's society, men like that can get women without making them uncomfortable, so why would they choose to do that?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/26 12:22 PM
1

You're Makin up a bunch of reasons but saying that men can't tell you the reason that they like sex within relationships?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 08:52 PM
1

You seem to be saying that if sex can mean nothing in one instance, that means that sex never means anything
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 08:43 PM
0

Do you believe that actions can only have 1 meaning?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 07:28 PM
4

fair enough. these women are extremely rare, especially if you practice good judgement with the people you speak to and befriend
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 07:27 PM
4

how many experiences like this have you had? you believe the woman in this example is representative of average women?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 07:22 PM
6

Oh? So what situations have you seen where it was an unreasonable question?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 07:19 PM
0

What "guys want here" is not a monolyth at all, and even if it was, it does not prove that "sex has nothing to do with love". That is a ridiculous statement that requires a huge amount of evidence. Just biologically speaking it's pretty obvious that the 2 are strongly linked, not to mention the tightly related sociology of love and sex. I have no idea how that statement has anything to do with my example. Yes; a relationship will obviously fail if either party only cares about 1 thing, regardles…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 07:18 PM
4

which might be a very reasonable question depending on what the guy is arguing :)
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 07:10 PM
1

Your logic does not hold whatsoever: just because a person can do an action without feelings about that action, does not mean that the action cannot be a critical part of a relationship. Simple example: Washing the dishes can be done by and for a woman and it can mean very little to her. But for the same woman, if she's in a 30-year marriage, and her husband expects her to cook every night, she might be extremely agitated that he never does the dishes.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 06:43 PM
4

Oh? Ok I'm listening. What can you tell me about how women experiences acceptance and sympathy if she opens up to her friends and family about safety concerns or issues on a date?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 02:05 PM
3

Except that women are easily accepted and sympathized with about safety conditions and similar topics. So not sure where your generalized cynicism comes from?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 08:00 PM
5

obviously it's not a gender issue, though it may be that one gender is more likely to be on one side of the issue. this is a super common issue in relationships, so it isn't logical to just give up from this problem alone, unless you think you can definitely find someone better
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 05:10 PM
3

Sure. I was just saying that most couples don't sit down on day 1 and make a chore chart. Also, if the dishwasher is constantly coming up, there's likely a deeper issue at play.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 04:03 PM
14

If you don't understand that caregiving involves "the process of managing feelings and expression", then you need to stay 1000 feet away from managing or being a partner in any household
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 04:02 PM
5

That's not very common. For most couples, they just need to try to keep an open dialogue about their ongoing needs and tasks to balance things out when needed.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 03:41 PM
2

Men also become particular if they're forced to take over everything in the house. But when the other partner starts to take an active interest and starts to be proactive, and take jobs off the other person's shoulders, it becomes easier to relax. It's precisely when all the work is auto-assigned to one person that they are forced to become particular about things
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 03:40 PM
18

You don't think that caregiving involves a huge amount of emotional labor...?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 03:39 PM
0

So you aren't opposed to gender-based criticisms when they're boiled down to a single derogatory phrase, is that right? So you only have issues with these types of phrases on a case-by-case basis, if you deem them to be used in a bad way?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 02:17 PM
1

Do you have a problem with the usage of the term "mansplaining"?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 02:04 PM
1

Normally you're comparing high n-count women not to virgins but to women who've had a BF or 2. If you're looking to compare extremes, then sure, there is some risk in dating a virgin that's worth taking into account as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 11:44 PM
1

Ok so you accept that both men and women can found their dislike of promiscuity in jealousy. So what is your issue, simply the usage of derogatory language based on sex? or is your point simply that "derogatory language is bad"?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 11:34 PM
2

I think the folks arguing against "ran through" are retreating to their bailey, boiling down their argument to just "i don't like mean words"
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 11:12 PM
2

Are you referring to an online community? I know they exist, but I feel like it's unusual for people to IRL know a bunch of men's fetishes, much less to know a bunch of cucks in particular.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 11:10 PM
1

So are you just simply against the use of gender-based derogatory terms? or against all derogatory terms?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 11:05 PM
1

Ok yeah jealousy is part of it, but I think the core is that heavy sleeping around is just a red flag, like many other red flags that both men and women watch for on a first/second date
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 11:00 PM
-4

So?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 10:59 PM
3

Ah xD Did you fuck their wives multiple times so you could get in a groove, learn what they like, and really fuck them better than their husbands could ever hope to? Did you get to know the wives and build a strong connection?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 10:58 PM
2

Obviously lol. And there's no point for you to point that out. Everyone already knows that a 5' man with a microdick and no job shouldn't be expecting a sensual bj from Sydney Sweeney every night. It's like if an NBA coach says "scoring points is important in basketball" and you say "actually, that's useless if you're 4' tall and very sick, because then you should just stay off the court or pass the ball" Like ok....what?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 10:48 PM
4

> how are dick's not the thing that ruins the woman The thing that ruins them is the increased likelihood that the woman will be interested in increasing her n-count in the future. Is this a guarantee? No, but neither are any of the assumptions we are all forced to make in early dating.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 10:33 PM
4

Do you? How did you meet these men and get them to admit this?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 10:32 PM
10

> you're trusting Why would ultimately having to trust someone have anything to do with assessing green and red flags in an early relationship? Men and women never tell you everything on the first date. It's 100% necessary to make assumptions based on cues, which are sometimes subtle. The difference between a woman who's slept with 0 men vs. 100 men is not a subtle difference. Do you not think that the women are judging him right back, and making assumptions instead of just "trusting" him?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 10:31 PM
11

Are you ideologically opposed to any derogatory term that is based on gender, such as mansplaining?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 10:29 PM
9

> especially when the men who use it are actually just jealous Do you also believe that women who look for a low N-count man are "actually just jealous"?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 10:28 PM
0

Both are highly subjective especially for different groups. But apparently you think even a "huge" amount of people isn't as "icky" as being bisexual, which seems strange. Do you not believe there is *any* number of sexual partners that women would find more icky than bisexuality? Also curious, are you aware how many women are currently obsessed and horny for gay hockey players?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 10:25 PM
-1

Sure, I'd be happy to rank those by biggest ick for women and curious what you think that proves. using a hooker running a huge amount of women (or more realistic, being known in the girl's community as a fuckboy and/or being known to have fucked ugly or otherwise undesirable women) bisexual running through a lot of women but not a huge amount, maybe 20-60 depending on the culture
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 10:17 PM
3

That's not really responsive to my statement, ie. you could say that about anything. For example, if I say it's reasonable for a woman to expect a man to wear deodorant on a date, you could reply by saying it's not reasonable *if the woman has no options of men who do wear deodorant*.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 10:13 PM
4

The terminology is different, but women do judge men for sleeping around a lot.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 09:45 PM
4

How is that not reasonable, assuming the man also has a low number of past sexual partners? It's not as if the average # of sexual partners is so high.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 09:44 PM
1

> "Ran-through" comes from jealousy, first and foremost. Many women are also turned off by a man who sleeps around a lot, and I wouldn't say it's from jealousy at all. Moreso it's used as a marker of the person's possible social behaviour
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 09:43 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter