| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Most women want socially liberal men who are capable of engaging in “benevolent misogyny “.Enough about your idea of "leadership" please, I'm not interested | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/03/26 08:36 PM |
| 1 | Most women want socially liberal men who are capable of engaging in “benevolent misogyny “.I'm not closed, just not actively pursuing a coworker at a new job. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/03/26 08:34 PM |
| 1 | Most women want socially liberal men who are capable of engaging in “benevolent misogyny “.Again there are other women | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/03/26 08:29 PM |
| 1 | Most women want socially liberal men who are capable of engaging in “benevolent misogyny “.I'm pursuing women outside of my workplace instead lol | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/03/26 08:13 PM |
| 1 | Most women want socially liberal men who are capable of engaging in “benevolent misogyny “.I'm not actually pursuing her but thanks :) | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/03/26 08:09 PM |
| 1 | Most women want socially liberal men who are capable of engaging in “benevolent misogyny “.which rules were those | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/03/26 07:44 PM |
| 1 | Most women want socially liberal men who are capable of engaging in “benevolent misogyny “.thanks bro you the best | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/03/26 07:42 PM |
| 1 | Most women want socially liberal men who are capable of engaging in “benevolent misogyny “.It was lol | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/03/26 07:36 PM |
| 1 | Most women want socially liberal men who are capable of engaging in “benevolent misogyny “.Oh please, big strong redditor with no evidence for anything, teach my how to get "bitches", oh wow, I want to be drowning in pussy toooooo plz | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/03/26 07:35 PM |
| 6 | Q4W: Who should be taught how to treat their partners? And why?What makes you think that is the case in relationships? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/03/26 07:34 PM |
| 1 | Most women want socially liberal men who are capable of engaging in “benevolent misogyny “."Who wants socially liberal men?" | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/03/26 07:33 PM |
| 1 | Most women want socially liberal men who are capable of engaging in “benevolent misogyny “.Aka "Trust me bro" | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/03/26 07:24 PM |
| 1 | Most women want socially liberal men who are capable of engaging in “benevolent misogyny “.If you cannot go from vaguely incorrect statements to anything broadly true, then you aren't worth listening to | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/03/26 07:21 PM |
| 1 | Most women want socially liberal men who are capable of engaging in “benevolent misogyny “.Sure. all my friends are kind. each is married with children. except one that's more of an outgoing and selfish guy, doesn't respect women. everyone's wife hates him so his friends mostly abandoned him. he did have a bit more success with women in university but now things are not going so hot for him. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/03/26 07:19 PM |
| 1 | Most women want socially liberal men who are capable of engaging in “benevolent misogyny “.You're describing every impactful cult; you begin with a kernel of truth, and then oversimplify things in order to mislead it's unwitting adherents. Red pill plants seeds alright! | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/03/26 07:07 PM |
| 5 | Q4W: Who should be taught how to treat their partners? And why?How do you think that is impacting men in relationships? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/03/26 07:04 PM |
| 0 | Most women want socially liberal men who are capable of engaging in “benevolent misogyny “.Evidence? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/03/26 07:01 PM |
| 1 | Most women want socially liberal men who are capable of engaging in “benevolent misogyny “.GPT confirms what thinking, non resentful adults can see obviously about the red pill: red pill views on dating are partly grounded in observation, but mostly oversimplified and often misleading. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/03/26 06:58 PM |
| 1 | Most women want socially liberal men who are capable of engaging in “benevolent misogyny “."Trust me bro...later..." | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/03/26 06:54 PM |
| 1 | Most women want socially liberal men who are capable of engaging in “benevolent misogyny “.Translation "Spend even more time using AI to learn about my baseless claims that have so far amounted to exaggeration at best and more often as resentful lies." "Bro you better do it if you know what's good for you" "I'm awakened and wise" Forgive me if im not convinced | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/03/26 06:51 PM |
| 1 | Most women want socially liberal men who are capable of engaging in “benevolent misogyny “."Trust me bro" again | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/03/26 06:47 PM |
| 1 | Most women want socially liberal men who are capable of engaging in “benevolent misogyny “.Makes broadly incorrect statements. Provides no evidence. "You'll get it later, trust me bro" | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/03/26 06:45 PM |
| 1 | Most women want socially liberal men who are capable of engaging in “benevolent misogyny “.Yes because you were shown to be talking bs 11 comments ago lol | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/03/26 06:41 PM |
| 1 | Most women want socially liberal men who are capable of engaging in “benevolent misogyny “.And I'm the one trying to save face xD | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/03/26 06:39 PM |
| 1 | Most women want socially liberal men who are capable of engaging in “benevolent misogyny “.Which point am I ideologically closer to "red" on? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/03/26 06:35 PM |
| 1 | Most women want socially liberal men who are capable of engaging in “benevolent misogyny “.If you were "curious" you'd see it and also see my other comment where your chosen fact checker takes a dump all over your baseless claims | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/03/26 06:31 PM |
| 1 | Most women want socially liberal men who are capable of engaging in “benevolent misogyny “.Woosh, you missed the point | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/03/26 06:26 PM |
| -1 | Most women want socially liberal men who are capable of engaging in “benevolent misogyny “.BTW, here is how chatGPT (obviously) classifies your comment: The claim that women generally prefer conservative men who pretend to be liberal is not supported by broad evidence. Large surveys show people usually prefer partners with similar political views (political assortative mating). The comment relies on personal anecdotes (“the men I know…”), which aren’t representative of broader patterns. The statement that “nice guys finish last” is also not consistently supported by research; traits l… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/03/26 06:24 PM |
| 1 | Most women want socially liberal men who are capable of engaging in “benevolent misogyny “.Even better <3 | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/03/26 06:17 PM |
| 1 | Most women want socially liberal men who are capable of engaging in “benevolent misogyny “.Finally you have used your reason to determine for yourself what is and is not worth asking a robot about! Great work sport | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/03/26 06:12 PM |
| 1 | Most women want socially liberal men who are capable of engaging in “benevolent misogyny “."Humans have 46 chromosomes" same question | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/03/26 06:05 PM |
| 1 | Most women want socially liberal men who are capable of engaging in “benevolent misogyny “."Water boils only at 100 °C" What does GPT say about this? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/03/26 05:56 PM |
| 1 | Most women want socially liberal men who are capable of engaging in “benevolent misogyny “.What did chat GPT say about it? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/03/26 05:53 PM |
| 1 | Most women want socially liberal men who are capable of engaging in “benevolent misogyny “."Humans have more than 5 senses" Let me know when you've explored this topic on chatgpt and tell me what you learned | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/03/26 05:51 PM |
| 3 | Most women want socially liberal men who are capable of engaging in “benevolent misogyny “.Lol ok so you actually do know the answer to your first question, you're just saying you don't like liberals | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/03/26 05:48 PM |
| 0 | Most women want socially liberal men who are capable of engaging in “benevolent misogyny “.Did I say that women have muscle issues or did I say they're weaker? If you have a weak friend and you know he doesn't have money to get movers, wouldn't you offer to help him? You might even do it for a strong friend too if you're a good guy | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/03/26 05:47 PM |
| 1 | Most women want socially liberal men who are capable of engaging in “benevolent misogyny “.You have skipped over a good faith discussion by refusing to back up your claims, making it much more challenging to clarify your positions. By the way, if you add "be honest and straightforward" you get: No — it’s not accurate to say women are “seldom taught leadership tactics.” | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/03/26 04:55 PM |
| 0 | Most women want socially liberal men who are capable of engaging in “benevolent misogyny “.I like how you are so openly admitting that you are extremely loose with your own words. You're just shouting broad claims with no care for precision, evidence or nuance | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/03/26 04:51 PM |
| 1 | Most women want socially liberal men who are capable of engaging in “benevolent misogyny “.This is precisely why the burden is on you to prove your claim; you haven't proven anything. you have exaggerated, that's all. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/03/26 04:50 PM |
| 0 | Most women want socially liberal men who are capable of engaging in “benevolent misogyny “.Wrong again, according to your favorite fact checker: "The claim that women are “seldom taught leadership tactics” is partly true in some contexts but overstated if taken literally." | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/03/26 04:49 PM |
| 7 | Typical workday hours are just as bad for men as they are for womenThe only people arguing this (if any) would be conservative men that think women should go back to the kitchen | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/03/26 04:46 PM |
| 1 | Most women want socially liberal men who are capable of engaging in “benevolent misogyny “.As I said, I didn't learn because I already understood that clearly your statement was exaggerated to the point of being wrong | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/03/26 04:45 PM |
| 2 | Most women want socially liberal men who are capable of engaging in “benevolent misogyny “.I asked chatgpt to look up some random idea to prove you were talking bs, which I already knew you were Wow good job :) | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/03/26 04:42 PM |
| 2 | Most women want socially liberal men who are capable of engaging in “benevolent misogyny “.Chat GPT, is performative liberalism ubiquitous in our society? "It exists and can be common in some contexts, but it’s not ubiquitous across society." Your chosen method for fact checking says your last claim is wrong | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/03/26 04:33 PM |
| 1 | Most women want socially liberal men who are capable of engaging in “benevolent misogyny “.You made a bunch of random baseless claims lol | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/03/26 04:28 PM |
| 1 | Most women want socially liberal men who are capable of engaging in “benevolent misogyny “.What specific claim would you like me to do the work of looking up instead of you? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/03/26 04:26 PM |
| 1 | Most women want socially liberal men who are capable of engaging in “benevolent misogyny “.You could have shared the data if you had it like 20 times. You have provided nothing worth looking up at this point or with any urgency other than personal anecdote which directly opposes my own. Yes, there is something wrong with lying to the person you are dating about who you are and what you believe. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/03/26 04:24 PM |
| 1 | Most women want socially liberal men who are capable of engaging in “benevolent misogyny “.You're trying to shift the burden of proof even though you're the one making a strong positive claim. I used to be a conservative that hid it while dating so I'm familiar with the subject | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/03/26 04:14 PM |
| 3 | LOOKS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADI see this guy is also roping you along with "just use chat GPT bro" | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/03/26 04:01 PM |
| 2 | Most women want socially liberal men who are capable of engaging in “benevolent misogyny “.It's always stupid to make a bunch of strong claims and your only backup is "chat GPT it bro". And the answer is no: you would not take the time to look up information if there's no good reason to think it might be correct | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/03/26 04:00 PM |
| 2 | Most women want socially liberal men who are capable of engaging in “benevolent misogyny “.If you hear a man screaming nonsense on the street, do you run to chat gpt every time to check if he's right everything he's saying? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/03/26 03:58 PM |
| 1 | Most women want socially liberal men who are capable of engaging in “benevolent misogyny “.True, likely non existent | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/03/26 03:54 PM |
| 3 | Most women want socially liberal men who are capable of engaging in “benevolent misogyny “.Stand behind your claims or don't make them You're the one with the communication problem, not me | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/03/26 03:53 PM |
| 3 | Most women want socially liberal men who are capable of engaging in “benevolent misogyny “.Lol I didn't realize i was talking to chat gpt | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/03/26 03:47 PM |
| 2 | Most women want socially liberal men who are capable of engaging in “benevolent misogyny “.Respectfully; that comment has no content to it as far as i can see, just abstract claims. Your anecdotes are not convincing | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/03/26 03:43 PM |
| 4 | Most women want socially liberal men who are capable of engaging in “benevolent misogyny “.I don't believe there's any evidence for or credence to the idea that your anecdotal experience of "very liberal" women dating lying conservative men shows. Your argument is based on a shakey claim. What makes you think that actual liberal men would do worse, given the same salary, confidence, willingness to pay on dates, etc? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/03/26 03:40 PM |
| 1 | Just want one date where they don't talk about exes/hookupsWomen don't either, on any significant scale | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/03/26 03:26 PM |
| 3 | Dating is asymmetric by nature.Oh yeah, women fighting to be able to vote is exactly like incels complaining that women don't want to fuck them | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/03/26 03:23 PM |
| 1 | Just want one date where they don't talk about exes/hookupsWomen don't do this on an significant scale. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/03/26 03:17 PM |
| 1 | Just want one date where they don't talk about exes/hookupsWomen don't do this more than men | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/03/26 03:17 PM |
| 1 | Just want one date where they don't talk about exes/hookupsStatistically it seems that you're doing something wrong, since the vast majority of people do not being up exes on a first date. You could be selecting the wrong type of people, going on dates that don't seem like dates, etc | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/03/26 03:14 PM |
| 0 | Most women want socially liberal men who are capable of engaging in “benevolent misogyny “.Women are physically weaker; if you had a friend that developed muscle issues, would you not offer to help him with physical tasks? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/03/26 03:11 PM |
| 4 | Most women want socially liberal men who are capable of engaging in “benevolent misogyny “.Which actions demonstrate that? Does wanting to get a first date paid for = please oppose public Healthcare? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/03/26 03:08 PM |
| 6 | Most women want socially liberal men who are capable of engaging in “benevolent misogyny “.Maybe literally it is, but the phrase is well understood. Your comment lacks content in responding to any actual points beyond surface level semantics | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/03/26 03:06 PM |
| 4 | Most women want socially liberal men who are capable of engaging in “benevolent misogyny “.Socially liberal women. In fact, they may be one of the groups that's least open to dating people with opposing views to themselves (very understandably imo) | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/03/26 03:03 PM |
| 1 | The biggest myth in dating is that women are the romantic genderSee my reply above for actual answers if you're interested in anything except the straw man in your head :) | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/03/26 11:34 AM |
| 2 | The biggest myth in dating is that women are the romantic gender> Men are 3× more likely to initiate and plan dates Starting with this since it's your actual point. Source please, on dating beyond the first 3 dates. https://www.psychologytoday.com/ca/blog/myths-desire/202103/how-plan-date-night-will-make-you-feel-closer "The authors noted that there were no significant impacts of relationship length, age, or gender." (I'm not saying that this study found that you're wrong - just that it's not obvious from academic literature I've seen that there's any differ… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/03/26 11:33 AM |
| 1 | The biggest myth in dating is that women are the romantic genderThis is not normal. Women are probably the ones planning way more dates in relationships, just not the first few. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/03/26 03:39 AM |
| 2 | Women should not be asked to settleBlue pill does not say that everyone isn't looking out for their best interest | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/03/26 04:18 PM |
| – | Women should not be asked to settleLike most ideologies/cults, Redpill has grains of truth and takes them into crazy directions - that's how they get you. Everyone is looking out for themselves; should I give Redpill a medal for figuring that out? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/03/26 04:15 PM |
| – | Most people will find love if they achieve the following things:Feel free to quote me if so | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/03/26 03:49 PM |
| – | Most people will find love if they achieve the following things:Who said they didn't? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/03/26 03:38 PM |
| 1 | Women should not be asked to settleBasically everyone "adjusts" to some degree; if someone was writing a list of traits of their ideal partner before meeting you, are you really checking every single box? Generally no, and that's totally ok—people don't expect or require perfection in general. Also, people aren't going to usually come out and tell you about these adjustments. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/03/26 03:36 PM |
| – | Most people will find love if they achieve the following things:I'm asking you what the significance of your first comment is in this conversation | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/03/26 03:33 PM |
| – | Most people will find love if they achieve the following things:What does that have to do with it? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/03/26 03:16 PM |
| – | Most people will find love if they achieve the following things:How is this helpful to anyone, or contributing to the conversation? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/03/26 03:10 PM |
| – | Women should not be asked to settleWomen (and men) will lower their standards only when necessary based on their goals and options, and that makes perfect sense (e.g., if a woman wants kids and feels she is running out of time looking for "the one", she will naturally begin to be accepting of qualities she might have filtered out before, or at least she may put more priority on different qualities like temperament). And that's basically how it's going to stay, regardless of what people say on Reddit | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/03/26 03:08 PM |
| 1 | Most people will find love if they achieve the following things:Well if you can get in a relationship with a girl you like and share interests with, and you're not a resentful person overall (ex. resentful of the opposite sex), then there's a good chance you will be able to feel love in that relationship. After all, biology does a good amount of the work there, especially once you start having sex. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/03/26 03:04 PM |
| 3 | Most people will find love if they achieve the following things:Agreed, and even if you are lacking in a few of these areas, you still may have a good chance when making the effort.. I did reasonably well even while living with my parents (I had previously lived on my own, knew how to handle living without my parents, and had a plan to save up and move), being an introvert, and not being wildly passionate about my job or much (I like a lot of different things/hobbies but am not obsessed with any one thing) | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/03/26 03:02 PM |
| 1 | Blue Pill is an ideology and actually very delusional.I'm clarifying your question. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/03/26 10:52 PM |
| 1 | Blue Pill is an ideology and actually very delusional.Who are you saying believes that looks don't matter? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/03/26 05:31 PM |
| 1 | From here on, the only occasion men should be giving women money is when they're availing of a hooker's service.You specifically called out an example with an "elderly widow" and you think that has nothing to do with power dynamics? How far in denial can you be? I do not see every issue through feminist identity politics, but I have eyes. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/03/26 05:29 PM |
| 2 | Blue Pill is an ideology and actually very delusional.RP makes affirmative claims which BP denies. If you want to get specific, then you have provide claims with sources. As a Blue Piller I can share studies that help explain the real world as most people outside RP understand it. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/03/26 05:28 PM |
| – | Blue Pill is an ideology and actually very delusional.Blue pill isn't a trend so much as it's the skepticism/denial of a trend | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/03/26 04:43 PM |
| 1 | From here on, the only occasion men should be giving women money is when they're availing of a hooker's service.Here you've introduced 2 new major elements which compromise the power dynamic. Do you believe that the adult nerd from your example should be as coddled and protected as an old person who may be losing their mind and whose life partner died, possibly recently? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/03/26 04:21 PM |
| 1 | Blue Pill is an ideology and actually very delusional.Plays down the importance = looks don't matter? I'm the one gaslighting? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/03/26 04:11 PM |
| 1 | From here on, the only occasion men should be giving women money is when they're availing of a hooker's service.You moved the goalpost in that example. I never said the guy was dumb just for getting into the relationship, but for draining his account for her | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/03/26 04:11 PM |
| – | Blue Pill is an ideology and actually very delusional.Ok, how so? You believe that "looks don't matter" is a tenant of blue pill? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/03/26 04:05 PM |
| – | From here on, the only occasion men should be giving women money is when they're availing of a hooker's service.Point is that the guy in your example drained his account if his own free will Being horny doesn't count as being taken advantage of | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/03/26 04:04 PM |
| – | From here on, the only occasion men should be giving women money is when they're availing of a hooker's service.So you vaguely know about some idiot that, of his own free will, spent all his money on some con artist girl he wasn't married to. And you find that one instance significant? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/03/26 03:38 PM |
| – | Blue Pill is an ideology and actually very delusional.The straw man is truly insane. "Looks don't matter"?? Dude nobody thinks that. BP emphasizes having a good personality because we're talking to resentful horny guys. For them, working on their personality is extremely beneficial. Why would blue pill have to explain to you that "attraction matters" if you're not a child? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/03/26 03:36 PM |
| -1 | Why do most guys say their ideal woman is a "good girl" (sweet, loyal, low body count, not super party-oriented)? Is it genuine or just what sounds good?For many men, "Good girl" is the long term/ responsibile goal. it's like eating a nice comforting and healthy meal. The "bad girl" is irresistible as a short term option, like fast food: if you walk by a McDonald's, sometimes it's hard to walk by without some McNuggets | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/03/26 03:33 PM |
| 2 | Blue Pill is an ideology and actually very delusional.It's easy to link individual studies to support most outlooks. For example: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12144-016-9501-8? This data suggests that people mate based on similarities rather that rp stuff, hierarchies or that women are out to get you etc. There are many that could be linked given a particular RP talking point. More critical is your bias in selecting studies | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/03/26 03:24 PM |
| 2 | Blue Pill is an ideology and actually very delusional.It's just regular dating lol. You adjust yourself to the dating pool you're in and try to get the best outcome without deceiving anyone. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/03/26 03:20 PM |
| – | From here on, the only occasion men should be giving women money is when they're availing of a hooker's service.I agree she is clearly a horrible person, but your friend sounds like an idiot. Why did he allow this to happen? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/03/26 03:16 PM |
| 1 | it’s depressing that money feels like the only way out .You haven't made any logical case which requires data to refute You have also apparently not even read a 2 sentence description of what therapy is from any reputable source | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/03/26 03:11 PM |
| 1 | BP is sex work positive yet fails to reconcile the fact that sex work is inherently misogynistic and literally objectifies womenDo you agree with those women? Or are you trotting out a belief that you don't even believe in, just to, what...set up a straw man? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/03/26 03:09 PM |
| 10 | Why is it always semantics and not the argument itself?The nice guy you described is likely to be getting a relationship with a nice girl if he has otherwise reasonable standards But he's very different from the guys that often consider themselves "nice" | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/03/26 03:05 PM |
| – | Blue Pill is an ideology and actually very delusional.Blue pill doesn't "believe" in a just world fallacy. Everybody knows that a woman generally isn't going to fall for you just because you're "nice" - that's why "nice guy" is literally an insult. And nothing about blue pill says "building attracting isn't important". that is also ridiculous and doesn't require a whole analogy to understand | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/03/26 02:56 PM |
| – | Blue Pill is an ideology and actually very delusional."Used the BP" is just the billions of people not using RP. And yes it has worked billions of times | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/03/26 02:53 PM |
| – | From here on, the only occasion men should be giving women money is when they're availing of a hooker's service.I'm a fellow man and disagree with OP | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/03/26 02:51 PM |
| – | From here on, the only occasion men should be giving women money is when they're availing of a hooker's service.Blockbuster changed because there was a better option. Horny men won't stop paying if it's helping them get their rocks off | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/03/26 02:51 PM |
| – | From here on, the only occasion men should be giving women money is when they're availing of a hooker's service.Yeah this is like saying "we need to stop tipping" except way worse because there's horny men involved. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/03/26 02:50 PM |
| – | From here on, the only occasion men should be giving women money is when they're availing of a hooker's service.Just pay for a coffee date where you learn what you need to. if she's not worth it, cut her off. it's not rocket science | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/03/26 02:49 PM |
| – | From here on, the only occasion men should be giving women money is when they're availing of a hooker's service.Who used you? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/03/26 02:48 PM |
| – | From here on, the only occasion men should be giving women money is when they're availing of a hooker's service.Women in my experience are pretty easy to read when it comes to this. When you offer to pay for the first date, I find that just their reaction tells you a lot about their intentions/gratitude or lack thereof | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/03/26 02:47 PM |
| – | Why are women often more religious than men?Men could learn a thing or two | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/03/26 02:45 PM |
| – | Blue Pill is an ideology and actually very delusional.Same questions | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/03/26 02:41 PM |
| 6 | Blue Pill is an ideology and actually very delusional.No thank you, I don't find it helpful to talk to robots | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/03/26 02:41 PM |
| – | it’s depressing that money feels like the only way out .Why would that logically follow? You realize how many people want to commit to a regular workout but are unable, right? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/03/26 02:40 PM |
| – | Blue Pill is an ideology and actually very delusional.Blue pill is 1000x better for finding a meaningful relationship | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/03/26 02:37 PM |
| 1 | Blue Pill is an ideology and actually very delusional.They speak from their own perspective like men do | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/03/26 02:36 PM |
| – | Blue Pill is an ideology and actually very delusional.Except that chatgpt isn't translating your words. it's taking words from others and regurgitating them | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/03/26 02:35 PM |
| 8 | Blue Pill is an ideology and actually very delusional.You're saying that every study you've ever seen has matched your preconceived conclusions? Don't you find that strange? How do you find your studies? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/03/26 02:21 PM |
| 8 | Blue Pill is an ideology and actually very delusional.How many have you read that disagree with your conclusions? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/03/26 02:16 PM |
| – | it’s depressing that money feels like the only way out .Your comparison is the one with no bearing on reality because of the examples you chose. You are downplaying the negative aspects of tate ("moral shortcomings"? Lol) and downplaying (actually almost completely ignoring) the benefits of an average therapist. your description of therapy fundamentally misunderstands what it is, especially the aspects involving actually helping people solve their problems and develop skills. Therapists also often recommend exercise when it makes sense for the indivi… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/03/26 02:15 PM |
| 2 | Blue Pill is an ideology and actually very delusional.I'm blue pill and even i see no logic to what you're saying. the absence of proof that someone is lying doesn't prove they're telling the truth | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/03/26 02:05 PM |
| 8 | Blue Pill is an ideology and actually very delusional.Do you think your bias has something to do with your ignoring studies that don't prove what you want? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/03/26 02:03 PM |
| 5 | Blue Pill is an ideology and actually very delusional.Are you trolling | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/03/26 02:01 PM |
| – | it’s depressing that money feels like the only way out .I'm not saying op deserved it in that instance, nor am I saying that no woman has ever been an asshole. If you go to a club (or any similar environment) to try to hit on women for example, I'm sure you'd find some women like that. What im saying is that it doesn't have to be the norm in anyone's life, assuming you aren't actively putting yourself in that type of situation repeatedly. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/03/26 01:56 PM |
| – | it’s depressing that money feels like the only way out .You missed a few of Tates qualities LOL And you guys gotta look at therapy reviews or something coz you found the worst ones (or you literally didn't specify to them what you were looking for) (or you're mischaracterizing them) | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/03/26 01:47 PM |
| – | it’s depressing that money feels like the only way out .You don't think that a man with improved confidence and ability to accept/not internalize negative feedback will be better with women? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/03/26 01:45 PM |
| – | it’s depressing that money feels like the only way out .If you told someone 100 times to get vitamin c when they're on the verge of getting scurvy, then the 101st time might sound like an insult to their ears | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/03/26 01:43 PM |
| – | it’s depressing that money feels like the only way out .Cope and stategize on how to improve | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/03/26 01:38 PM |
| – | it’s depressing that money feels like the only way out .How does therapy push someone out of dating? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/03/26 01:38 PM |
| – | it’s depressing that money feels like the only way out .Most women aren't going to come out and say something like that unless you're being super forward with them and they have to fend you off with their words | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/03/26 01:37 PM |
| – | it’s depressing that money feels like the only way out .You've highlighted your ideal internet guru and a cartoonishly bad therapist in order to make your point | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/03/26 01:36 PM |
| 1 | Being upset about not having had sex is not a moral failure or entitlement. Why do you pretend it is ?You're perfectly describing a motte and bailey lol | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/03/26 08:18 PM |
| 3 | Being upset about not having had sex is not a moral failure or entitlement. Why do you pretend it is ?I believe that society does better when men especially learn to take responsibility for themselves, and there are many reasons for that, including men's far increased propensity to commit crime. Nobody wants men in society running around being resentful and taking out their frustrations on society, which men are more likely to do in a violent way. If you want to call that regressive, I think you're just trying to obfuscate the truth. Isn't thisbwhat us known as toxic reinforcement of gender role… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/03/26 06:19 PM |
| 1 | Being upset about not having had sex is not a moral failure or entitlement. Why do you pretend it is ?Be my guest if you'd like to point out any time I did so, as I have done for you several times over. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/03/26 06:13 PM |
| – | Being upset about not having had sex is not a moral failure or entitlement. Why do you pretend it is ?Because you can see the goalposts being moved in real time | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/03/26 05:13 PM |
| 3 | Being upset about not having had sex is not a moral failure or entitlement. Why do you pretend it is ?It shows that he isn't powerless, and if he was a real man, could stop being an incel using his own free will instead of expecting other people to do it for him. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/03/26 04:31 PM |
| 3 | Being upset about not having had sex is not a moral failure or entitlement. Why do you pretend it is ?Because he is free to 1. adjust himself and his approach and try again or 2. pay for sex | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/03/26 04:25 PM |
| 2 | Being upset about not having had sex is not a moral failure or entitlement. Why do you pretend it is ?If you're an incel (and not under the age of like 25) it's your fault in 99% of cases. If that makes you feel the need to lash out at billions of people who are also just trying to live their life, then that's on you | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/03/26 04:16 PM |
| 3 | Being upset about not having had sex is not a moral failure or entitlement. Why do you pretend it is ?I'm explaining the obvious and justified consequences of their words - but they are free to act however they want. It is not "kissing women's asses" to accept responsibility and become the man you want to be, instead of logging on to the internet and complaining in a forum with other incels. That used to just be called being a man. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/03/26 04:00 PM |
| 2 | Being upset about not having had sex is not a moral failure or entitlement. Why do you pretend it is ?wonders aloud if the problem might not lie with him This doesn't happen lol. You're making shit up to justify your point. Nobody posts here explaining their situation, truly exploring their personal trials and challenges and efforts so far, and then says "But even considering my personal flaws and issues, I still wonder if the world could be kinder to me or if maybe issues lie beyond myself" and then gets dog piled. You're in fantasy land | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/03/26 03:54 PM |
| 2 | Being upset about not having had sex is not a moral failure or entitlement. Why do you pretend it is ?If you say that in a way that an incel would say it, in a forum where tons of incels post about that topic, then yes obviously you will be looked as an incel. This is like complaining that if you show up to a basketball game in a referee shirt with a whistle on your neck, that people might think you are a referee. Again, go to a forum that isn't overrun by incels or just simply make it clear that you are not blaming your problems on an entire class of billions of people, and you'll be just fine … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/03/26 03:48 PM |
| 5 | Being upset about not having had sex is not a moral failure or entitlement. Why do you pretend it is ?Again you're mixing things up. If you are genuinely exploring this topic and especially if you are looking for your "own character flaws" as part of the exploration, you will not be labelled that way unless you specifically come to a community like this and start to say shit that is adjacent to red pill stuff. Go to r/virgin or to real world friends or something like that and you'll be completely fine. You are complaining about nothing. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/03/26 02:04 PM |
| 2 | Being upset about not having had sex is not a moral failure or entitlement. Why do you pretend it is ?I know the definition of venting and what men do (as I am one). None of that proves any of the claims you've made. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/03/26 01:54 PM |
| 3 | About the chore gap, could gendered differences play into it? And what is the endgame, anyway?Yeah that can be helpful. I and my partner have our own offices that are under our individual jurisdictions | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/03/26 01:52 PM |
| – | Being upset about not having had sex is not a moral failure or entitlement. Why do you pretend it is ?> continum of expression I'm glad you agree that it's just you expressing your feelings rather than a real argument | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/03/26 01:51 PM |
| – | Being upset about not having had sex is not a moral failure or entitlement. Why do you pretend it is ?So we've gone from: > The fact that he admitted it lables him as redpill and now we're at: > [saying that] womens standards are too high [gets you labeled as redpill] Isn't that an interesting jump? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/03/26 12:34 PM |
| – | Being upset about not having had sex is not a moral failure or entitlement. Why do you pretend it is ?Admitted what, to being a virgin? Are you seriously arguing that "redditors" would instantly label any virgin as a red piller, regardless of what they're saying or their flair? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/03/26 12:23 PM |
| 11 | Being upset about not having had sex is not a moral failure or entitlement. Why do you pretend it is ?Not as part of an argument against this claim "No one here is claiming being upset is a moral failing." If you meant it as an aside, and concede that nobody generally believes that you being upset is a moral failing, then sure you can continue to other parts of your argument. But if you keep switching between them mid-argument, even when replying to a more narrow point, then you're confusing the point (or at worst, using a motte and bailey) instead of arguing clearly and clarifying anything. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/03/26 12:21 PM |
| – | About the chore gap, could gendered differences play into it? And what is the endgame, anyway?Normal is communicating openly with your partner about how they want their life to look, both for big picture and daily things, and compromising to find the best way to get their together. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/03/26 12:00 PM |
| – | Being upset about not having had sex is not a moral failure or entitlement. Why do you pretend it is ?*only if he's labeled red pill :) | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/03/26 11:42 AM |
| – | Being upset about not having had sex is not a moral failure or entitlement. Why do you pretend it is ?See how you moved the goal post from "being upset" to "hiring a prostitute" within one comment? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/03/26 11:41 AM |
| 1 | Ladies, If you’re not attracted to 90-95% of men, that’s not a male problem.. thats a YOU problemAgreed | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/03/26 11:29 AM |
| 1 | Why do women continue to pursue men after bad experiences? And why are they attracted to them?more people will “realize” a broader range of attraction? Yes, probably, as societal taboos break down, people will probably expand their range of what they're attracted to. In which case attraction towards women will be greater than that towards men? Maybe, with deepening divides between men and women, I'm not sure - to me it seems unlikely. As this is happening, men of new generations are also evolving, not staying static. Many are stepping up to the challenge and don't care for old school and… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/03/26 02:07 AM |
| – | Do you find maintaining interpersonal relationships to be easy? Hard? Necessary? Unimportant?I feel that quite deeply lol. Even if there's nothing to do, I often sit on the couch when I have a friend over and just flip through Netflix or whatever. I think I'm a more extreme example though | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/03/26 09:35 PM |
| – | Why do women continue to pursue men after bad experiences? And why are they attracted to them?I would say that this doesn't qualify as cognitive dissonance unless you believe that *all* men or the vast majority are likely to be bad in the same ways that your exes were. To back that up; cognitive dissonance involves 2 contradictory beliefs/values etc., but the following are not contradictory: 1. "Many men, like my exes, are bad" 2. "I am biologically attracted to men, some portion of which are good and others bad" | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/03/26 09:31 PM |
| 2 | Ladies, If you’re not attracted to 90-95% of men, that’s not a male problem.. thats a YOU problemfor every hundred you comb through But there are filters already "combing" on your behalf, including filtering people just nearby to you. Again, this is sort of an abstract numbers thing - you can look at the "filtering process" in different ways to make it sounds reasonable or absurd. Additionally, maybe you swipe right on 25% (1 out of 4 is a reasonable use of time) but then filter 50% of those candidates through texting, then another 50% from the first date, etc. etc. This feels pretty normal… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/03/26 09:23 PM |
| 1 | Ladies, If you’re not attracted to 90-95% of men, that’s not a male problem.. thats a YOU problemWhen the commenter said she assumed 5% wants a relationship with her, When did she say this? If she did, then I'm wrong. At what point does lowering your chances of finding a partner become absurd? It really depends how you look at things. Are we talking about 5% of the guys on Hinge? Because that could still be quite a lot of eligible guys. Or 5% of the guys in the country in her age range? Still that's not bad, especially you can find a much higher concentration of those guys by going meeting … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/03/26 08:51 PM |
| 1 | Ladies, If you’re not attracted to 90-95% of men, that’s not a male problem.. thats a YOU problemMaybe I'm crazy lol, but I do not see how you're answering my question. I will try my best to engage with your answer and example. By default, that 5% includes men who are not attracted to her, as you have no way of knowing one way or the other based on attractiveness of the man. Looking first again at this logic. Ok, so original commenter DOES include, in the 5%, both men who are attracted to her and those who are not attracted to her. So that's what your logic is saying, and I agree with it. I… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/03/26 07:14 PM |
| – | Why do you think Studys about dating are only wrong in the Red Pill direction?Blue pill is the denial of the red pill, so it doesn't necessarily need its own studies. There's no burden of proof | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/03/26 06:51 PM |
| 1 | Ladies, If you’re not attracted to 90-95% of men, that’s not a male problem.. thats a YOU problemshowing she includes the full 5% of all men she is attracted to. Again I understand this and agree that she does it. How is that the same as her assuming that the 5% does NOT include men who aren't attracted to her? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/03/26 05:58 PM |
| 1 | Ladies, If you’re not attracted to 90-95% of men, that’s not a male problem.. thats a YOU problemUnderstood. same question again; where did she assume that it didn't include the men who aren't attracted to her? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/03/26 05:42 PM |
| 5 | Ladies, If you’re not attracted to 90-95% of men, that’s not a male problem.. thats a YOU problemWhere did she assume that it doesn't include those men? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/03/26 03:56 PM |
| 1 | How many of you have women in your life and would you ever tell them your views on women?You: silence | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/03/26 03:53 PM |
| 5 | Ladies, If you’re not attracted to 90-95% of men, that’s not a male problem.. thats a YOU problemIf they can't filter for it, then logically how can I be wrong when I say that the original comment isn't assuming anything about the 5%? If you can't filter for it, then wouldn't you have to just basically ignore that and not make any assumptions one way or the other? Regardless, there is simply not an assumption stated or implicit in the original comment. do you see one? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/03/26 03:51 PM |
| – | Ladies, If you’re not attracted to 90-95% of men, that’s not a male problem.. thats a YOU problem> houses that aren't for sale in that percentage. I think my analogy of houses out of your price range is much more analogous; Houses that are not for sale are more like married men or like...celibate monks lol. But in the end we agree that: > the percentage you've narrowed to is actually lower. This is of course true, but just not really an issue for the original comment. Yes, filtering can always be done to a more granular degree. There will be yet more filtering even when you go from 5% to ju… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/03/26 03:12 PM |
| – | Ladies, If you’re not attracted to 90-95% of men, that’s not a male problem.. thats a YOU problemHere's what happened as I see it: Original comment about filtering to 5% of men so dating is more efficient Reply: Claims that 'you're assuming that 5% like you' (even though 5% obviously is just an estimate anyways and not a real amount of men) Me: No, they're not assuming that* + analogy I have put an asterisk where I disagreed with the whole 'you're making an assumption' claim. You could say that my reply was a bit scant, but so was the comment I'm replying to. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/03/26 02:56 PM |
| – | Ladies, If you’re not attracted to 90-95% of men, that’s not a male problem.. thats a YOU problemYou may have noticed that 25 was the beginning of the range, not the end or even middle. That's because 25 is a common time for women to begin considering their timeline and understand that dating to find "the one" can take several years to accomplish. Waiting until the last minute to consider the options and begin dating seriously can be a recipe for disaster. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/03/26 02:34 PM |
| – | Ladies, If you’re not attracted to 90-95% of men, that’s not a male problem.. thats a YOU problemThat's cool, it's important to be yourself and chase your happiness even when you're outside the norm. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/03/26 02:32 PM |
| – | Ladies, If you’re not attracted to 90-95% of men, that’s not a male problem.. thats a YOU problemI don't think I'm misunderstanding the statement, I think I'm pointing out that the logical "flaw" that you and the commenter before me are expressing is not inherently an issue with the previous commenter. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/03/26 02:32 PM |
| – | Ladies, If you’re not attracted to 90-95% of men, that’s not a male problem.. thats a YOU problem> you said "only" first I never used the word "only" but I see you're talking about the original comment, fair enough. That does not constitute moving any "goalposts" - I'm happy to lay out the basic logic: since the vast majority of people marry within their race, it is very likely that people have fairly strong in-group preference for dating on average. Therefore, it is unlikely that anyone with an understanding of society would believe that in-group preference (even strong ones) are automatic… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/03/26 02:30 PM |
| – | Ladies, If you’re not attracted to 90-95% of men, that’s not a male problem.. thats a YOU problemIf you're actively dating to find a serious partner at the age of 75, while participating in Reddit discussions, and especially if you are acting like your experience is relevant to the larger dating culture, then yes - you're ultra rare and legendary for sure. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/03/26 01:44 PM |
| 1 | Baffled with women who go on dates with men that aren't their typeI don't want to make fun of you since English seems to not be your first language. But you are legitimately not writing at a level where it's possible to understand your arguments. Work on your basic grammar. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/03/26 01:41 PM |
| – | Ladies, If you’re not attracted to 90-95% of men, that’s not a male problem.. thats a YOU problemReading sure is hard | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/03/26 01:39 PM |
| 1 | Baffled with women who go on dates with men that aren't their typeSimple? Yes. Sound reasoning? No. You don't have to take other people's judgment seriously, and they don't have to take yours seriously. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/03/26 01:19 PM |
| – | Ladies, If you’re not attracted to 90-95% of men, that’s not a male problem.. thats a YOU problemOh my bad, I meant older only as in 'people who have gone from early dating to potentially dating for marriage, which 25 being the early approximate time that some women start to think about their pregnancy timeline, and/or the early beginning of when their friends start to get engaged | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/03/26 01:14 PM |
| 1 | Baffled with women who go on dates with men that aren't their typeBecause judgemnt is placed in men by women. lol so again, your judgement has no logical bearing on anyone, and there's no reason anyone would take it seriously. If I judge you as being stupid, are you going to say "oh shoot, I guess I'm dumb and wrong." No, you're not. So why would anyone care what you personally think, if you're not backing it up except to just say "trust me bro" while mispelling basic words? Your point us useless Ok so you really don't have an argument lol. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/03/26 01:00 PM |
| – | Ladies, If you’re not attracted to 90-95% of men, that’s not a male problem.. thats a YOU problem> your logic assumes that that 5% also wants a relationship with you No it doesn't. If you really need an analogy to understand: If I want to buy a house with a garage, 3+ bedrooms and a fireplace, that doesn't "assume" that all houses in that category are affordable to me. I will have to spend time searching for one that meets a balance between my desires and my budget. I may even have to get a better job, or take out a loan etc. to improve my chances of getting the house I want. Fairly simple … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/03/26 12:56 PM |
| – | Ladies, If you’re not attracted to 90-95% of men, that’s not a male problem.. thats a YOU problem> I'm reminded of So no - they were pretty clearly not "taking truths" from a TV show, regardless of your personal judgment on that show. > 50% is attractive, 50% is unnatractive. Why would this be the case? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/03/26 12:53 PM |
| – | Ladies, If you’re not attracted to 90-95% of men, that’s not a male problem.. thats a YOU problem*I don't agree with OP but* Mostly it would impact women who are ready for a serious relationship, especially those starting to think about having a family, approx. 25-35, who cannot find a long term partner that meets their standards, and often those who want kids so they feel they have a limited time window | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/03/26 12:50 PM |
| – | Ladies, If you’re not attracted to 90-95% of men, that’s not a male problem.. thats a YOU problemThe overwhelming majority of people marry within their own race. Nobody with any level of maturity views racial preferences in dating as racist in and of itself. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/03/26 12:48 PM |
| – | Ladies, If you’re not attracted to 90-95% of men, that’s not a male problem.. thats a YOU problemThe overwhelming majority of people marry within their own race, and you somehow think that a racial preference in dating is "strange"? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/03/26 12:47 PM |
| 1 | Baffled with women who go on dates with men that aren't their typeA nerdy personality isn’t as offputting as you’re making it We have a misunderstanding; I am not saying that a nerdy personality is off-putting. I personally am a nerd and have had no huge issues dating. "Nerdy personality" was just an example of a personality-based quality that might turn off a woman - and yes, many women are turned off by nerds - but many are not. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/03/26 05:31 PM |
| 1 | Baffled with women who go on dates with men that aren't their typeNot more worthy, equally worth. Then why are you placing a judgement, saying that a woman's perspective of appreciating/selecting for personality = just "tolerating" the man? Couldn't a woman say that you are just "tolerating" her personality because of her looks? Anything could be or not Exactly my point. The example is a guy who looks "good enough" (ie. not Henry Cavil and 99% chance to not be as rich or famous) and has a personality that the woman does not like. Just because a guy of ultra-ex… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/03/26 04:56 PM |
| 2 | Baffled with women who go on dates with men that aren't their typeLooks > personality for attraction This is such an oversimplification especially for women, and even moreso for women who are approx. 25 and older, often looking for a partner to have children with. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/03/26 04:20 PM |
| 5 | Baffled with women who go on dates with men that aren't their typeit's just the truth. No, it's a misunderstanding. AKA they're willing to tolerate You're placing a judgment on what women want (ie. a different ratio of looks - personality - stability/ability to support them etc.), but why should your personal judgment matter to anyone? What makes women's desires any more worthy of judgment than a man's? She would still go for this man. The fact that you are willing to make such a confident conclusion based on such a small amount of info is absurd. The man in q… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/03/26 04:18 PM |
| 12 | Baffled with women who go on dates with men that aren't their typeIt's not women's fault that men care much more about looks than personality in early dating | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/03/26 04:02 PM |
| 12 | Baffled with women who go on dates with men that aren't their type"Not my type" = 99% of the time means I don't find you physically attractive This is such a male-centred perspective, which is your problem. Women are more likely to be open to different looks *if* they like a guys personality. For example, a guy could look good enough but turn out to be nerdy, which the girl might not like, ie. not her type. Whereas a guy would, on average, care less if a hot girl is a nerd or not. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/03/26 03:49 PM |
| 2 | Do you find maintaining interpersonal relationships to be easy? Hard? Necessary? Unimportant?Thanks again for helping get my questions answered better than the people I'm actually talking to xD | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/03/26 06:13 PM |
| 2 | Do you find maintaining interpersonal relationships to be easy? Hard? Necessary? Unimportant?...Only if you boil down all of gender dynamics into this one example and ignore the reasons why a woman might avoid such an invitation... | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/03/26 06:12 PM |
| 7 | How many of you have women in your life and would you ever tell them your views on women?How is that a red pill view in and of itself? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/03/26 06:06 PM |
| 14 | How many of you have women in your life and would you ever tell them your views on women?So your views on women are that your cousin is a shitty life partner? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/03/26 05:58 PM |
| 2 | Do you find maintaining interpersonal relationships to be easy? Hard? Necessary? Unimportant?I think that if a woman doesn't want to go to a dinner party with 80% men, it doesn't prove much of anything about whether men have the freedom or ability to find emotional support | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/03/26 05:54 PM |
| 2 | Do you find maintaining interpersonal relationships to be easy? Hard? Necessary? Unimportant?What observation are you making and what's the importance of it? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/03/26 05:44 PM |
| 2 | Do you find maintaining interpersonal relationships to be easy? Hard? Necessary? Unimportant?Ok so if you and your friends do this, then what's the problem? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/03/26 05:42 PM |
| 1 | Studies against Men Are Often Designed to Confirm a Narrative, Not Find TruthI agree with you, I just take issue with the terminology used originally which is minor | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/03/26 04:33 PM |
| 2 | Do you find maintaining interpersonal relationships to be easy? Hard? Necessary? Unimportant?Why do you require women to come to your 80% male events? (Or i could be misunderstanding... what is your point?) | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/03/26 04:30 PM |
| 3 | Do you find maintaining interpersonal relationships to be easy? Hard? Necessary? Unimportant?You wouldn't invite your friends to your birthday party or baby shower? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/03/26 04:29 PM |
| 2 | Do you find maintaining interpersonal relationships to be easy? Hard? Necessary? Unimportant?For sure, there's a lot of pressure to be on the same life stage as your friends | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/03/26 04:10 PM |
| 1 | Do you find maintaining interpersonal relationships to be easy? Hard? Necessary? Unimportant?Good to hear. Yeah I know some relationships like that but in my case the women all make decent enough incomes, so it's hard to understand why they're with the guys. Low self-esteem is usually the easiest guess but who knows | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/03/26 04:02 PM |
| 3 | Do you find maintaining interpersonal relationships to be easy? Hard? Necessary? Unimportant?Insane lol. I believe, luckily/hopefully, there will be less and less men like him in new generations. Have you ever dated a guy who turned out to be that level of...whatever that is? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/03/26 03:54 PM |
| 4 | Do you find maintaining interpersonal relationships to be easy? Hard? Necessary? Unimportant?Ah yeah I hear you, I didn't make the connection lol. I do think that's pretty sad tbh. My partner does say that she feels more comfortable and seen with me than with anyone else including her friends, which I cherish. It sucks to imagine going through something like pregnancy and other of life's most difficult challenges with a partner that doesn't fully understand you. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/03/26 03:44 PM |
| 1 | Men turn blind eye to other men's behavior but then demand to be treated a good in general.Nobody wants to befriend a person who dislikes them for their gender or otherwise holds deep prejudice against them. Pretty basic stuff lol | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/03/26 03:40 PM |
| 2 | Do you find maintaining interpersonal relationships to be easy? Hard? Necessary? Unimportant?> Is it because she’s your partner or because she’s a woman? My first instinct is to say it's both. That said, every woman I've been friends with has been more in tune with both her own feelings and mine that my male friends. So my limited experience would say that gender is more of a factor overall. > I ask because many women have the exact opposite experience. I'm a little confused what you mean by "opposite" here. It seems like men (at least in my generation and above) are overall less emotio… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/03/26 03:30 PM |
| 1 | Men turn blind eye to other men's behavior but then demand to be treated a good in general.Ok well I think using the phrase "support men" interchangeably with the phrase "support bad men" is a pretty obvious problem regardless of context and not just something i should have to ask for clarification on. Perhaps your understanding of all men here (red, purple, blue) as all bad is related to why men don't seek to help you very much in your personal life. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/03/26 03:24 PM |
| 0 | Men turn blind eye to other men's behavior but then demand to be treated a good in general.Ok so your last comment made no sense lol. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/03/26 03:09 PM |
| 1 | Men turn blind eye to other men's behavior but then demand to be treated a good in general.Well anyone would say that lol. But hey, maybe you're one of the red pillers that doesn't talk bs. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/03/26 03:08 PM |
| -1 | Men turn blind eye to other men's behavior but then demand to be treated a good in general.Wait what? What's wrong with "supporting men"? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/03/26 03:07 PM |
| 1 | Do you find maintaining interpersonal relationships to be easy? Hard? Necessary? Unimportant?Yes it generally is. That said, very few men I know are capable of emotional support the way that my partner is | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/03/26 03:02 PM |
| 4 | Men turn blind eye to other men's behavior but then demand to be treated a good in general.There's tons of blue and purple pill men here that push back against red pill bs. I addressed both this community and outside situations. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/03/26 03:01 PM |
| – | Studies against Men Are Often Designed to Confirm a Narrative, Not Find TruthI think it's wise to avoid fixation on which gender has it better or worse on an individual basis. The struggles of others shouldn't diminish your own. That said, it's not a "fact" that both genders have precisely the same amount of hardships or anything like that. I highly doubt that's the case, and there's not really a reason to think it would be (because, spoilers, men and women are not the same and society doesn't treat them the same). | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/03/26 03:00 PM |
| 7 | Men turn blind eye to other men's behavior but then demand to be treated a good in general.There is a ton of push-back on bad men in this sub, and it often gets upvoted pretty strongly. That being said, this is a somewhat niche community on the internet with a very specific demographic, and shouldn't be taken as any kind of survey of the wider population. This community specifically encourages men with strong views on gender-dynamics and asks them to voice their opinions. You shouldn't come here and expect men like that to not be able to speak or anything like that. Bystander effect i… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/03/26 02:28 PM |
| 8 | What’s going on with the comments on this IG reel? Do women just hate men?> Seems staged? So its bad when people find a clip funny thats scripted to be funny? This really has nothing to do with the question of whether the reactions to this clip prove something about women's feelings toward men (I personally think it doesn't prove much for reasons others have mentioned like bots and a biased/niche audience) But just the fact that something is scripted doesn't impact anything. For example, if fascism became so popular in America that SNL could get huge laughs just by ma… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/03/26 02:19 PM |
| 7 | Do you find maintaining interpersonal relationships to be easy? Hard? Necessary? Unimportant?I find it easy to do when I have mutual activities I can do with friends, like D&D or video games. But once those dry up (we get bored of the games etc.), then it becomes more of an active effort to maintain friendships. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/03/26 02:15 PM |
| – | Studies against Men Are Often Designed to Confirm a Narrative, Not Find TruthThese are *claims*. Fixed it for you :) | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/03/26 02:14 PM |
| 2 | Know any guys that have stopped paying for dates?I've never asked a woman to pay on a date, but I do notice which ones are ungrateful when I do pay. Major red flag if they're not appreciative. Green flag if they offer to pay or say "thank you, I'll get the next time!" | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/03/26 12:27 PM |
| 1 | The term "ran-though" needs to end.Nobody wants to date someone that's gotten rejected a ton... | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/02/26 10:08 PM |
| 2 | As a man, Why am I not allowed to argue with women?I'm not adding. gossiping is a definition of shit talk and that's what I meant. if you want to change my claim for me then I'm not sure there's a point in arguing | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/02/26 10:07 PM |
| 1 | Feminists will do all sorts of mental gymnastics to avoid admitting that women objectify themselves whenever it's convenient, and would rather demonize male sexuality instead.You're making a claim which every study is see seems to disagree with so why wouldn't I need a study? What else is there to go on? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/02/26 10:05 PM |
| 2 | As a man, Why am I not allowed to argue with women?Shit talk means they talk about you behind your back, not just argue with you | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/02/26 09:20 PM |
| 2 | As a man, Why am I not allowed to argue with women?Huh? I never said women wouldn't argue with you about eggs, just that they wouldn't hate you for it. Normal women don't care if you prefer to eat your eggs over easy or over medium, I don't know what you're talking about tbh | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/02/26 09:14 PM |
| 1 | Feminists will do all sorts of mental gymnastics to avoid admitting that women objectify themselves whenever it's convenient, and would rather demonize male sexuality instead.I'm looking for sources but don't see any which back you up by saying that male preference for low n- count has remained stable | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/02/26 07:41 PM |
| 1 | Feminists will do all sorts of mental gymnastics to avoid admitting that women objectify themselves whenever it's convenient, and would rather demonize male sexuality instead.Do you think that men born in the year 2000 are/will care as much about promiscuity as men born in the year 1900? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/02/26 06:11 PM |
| 1 | Feminists will do all sorts of mental gymnastics to avoid admitting that women objectify themselves whenever it's convenient, and would rather demonize male sexuality instead.Ok I understand, you're talking about the modern feminist movement (probably online), not the textbook definitions. That's fair. Why is it unrealistic to believe that women should be able to be as promiscuous as men without being shamed? Isn't that what happens for men? Nobody ever said anything negative about me for sleeping around in university. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/02/26 05:53 PM |
| 1 | Feminists will do all sorts of mental gymnastics to avoid admitting that women objectify themselves whenever it's convenient, and would rather demonize male sexuality instead.You want a source on the claim that feminism endorses freedom for women? Or are you asking for evidence to prove a negative? Nobody sane, and no "vast majority" of feminists says anyone is free of all judgements or consequences. You're arguing against a straw man | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/02/26 05:38 PM |
| 2 | Feminists will do all sorts of mental gymnastics to avoid admitting that women objectify themselves whenever it's convenient, and would rather demonize male sexuality instead.You're conflating a bunch different claims without backing them up. Feminists believe women should have the ability to dress how they want, which can be either modest or not modest. Feminism is about freedom - yes. Feminism is about "no accountability"? No. Feminism is against certain forms of sexist judgement, but not all. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/02/26 05:27 PM |
| 1 | Feminists will do all sorts of mental gymnastics to avoid admitting that women objectify themselves whenever it's convenient, and would rather demonize male sexuality instead.That quote is attributed to Socrates, not Plato, who simply wrote the words down, but didn't come up with them Still nothing you're describing is a double standard or really negative in any way | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/02/26 06:42 PM |
| 1 | Feminists will do all sorts of mental gymnastics to avoid admitting that women objectify themselves whenever it's convenient, and would rather demonize male sexuality instead.I think you're talking about a fair exception but not a double standard. An example would be that most people aren't interested in having sex for money. However, many people with that general rule would be pretty happy if you offered them 10 billion dollars to make out with someone they find moderately attractive. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/02/26 06:02 PM |
| 1 | Feminists will do all sorts of mental gymnastics to avoid admitting that women objectify themselves whenever it's convenient, and would rather demonize male sexuality instead.You need women to tell you that attractive men are more attractive and therefore, their romantic advances are more likely to be successful? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/02/26 05:10 PM |
| 2 | Feminists will do all sorts of mental gymnastics to avoid admitting that women objectify themselves whenever it's convenient, and would rather demonize male sexuality instead.It is not remotely hypocritical to be attracted to Jeff Golblum and repulsed by some random guy. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/02/26 05:09 PM |
| 1 | Feminists will do all sorts of mental gymnastics to avoid admitting that women objectify themselves whenever it's convenient, and would rather demonize male sexuality instead.Who is | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/02/26 04:53 PM |
| 2 | Feminists will do all sorts of mental gymnastics to avoid admitting that women objectify themselves whenever it's convenient, and would rather demonize male sexuality instead.We're talking about feminism overall since you didn't specify in your original claim. If you want to amend your original point to only include specific types of feminism, feel free | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/02/26 03:09 PM |
| 4 | Feminists will do all sorts of mental gymnastics to avoid admitting that women objectify themselves whenever it's convenient, and would rather demonize male sexuality instead.Except none of that is true because the majority of young women are feminists (and probably a minority also believe in feminist values but just don't like/fully grasp the term) | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/02/26 01:41 PM |
| 1 | As a man, Why am I not allowed to argue with women?Well if you're arguing topics like abortion (or for politicians who support bans on it or appointed judges who repealed RvW) then it makes sense that many women would dislike you after finding out your views. I doubt that any normal woman would hate or shit talk you just for being part of an argument about the best way to cook an egg | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/02/26 01:03 PM |
| 6 | Feminists will do all sorts of mental gymnastics to avoid admitting that women objectify themselves whenever it's convenient, and would rather demonize male sexuality instead.It's not inherently hypocritical. The standard is basically "you can look at me but don't ogle" and "you can make a first move and then wait to see if I reciprocate. if I do, then proceed. otherwise back off" | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/02/26 12:26 PM |
| 2 | Feminists will do all sorts of mental gymnastics to avoid admitting that women objectify themselves whenever it's convenient, and would rather demonize male sexuality instead.But is that assertion valid? or is he just seeing a subset of feminists (the loud ones and the ones who post a lot on socials) who are also more likely to be ok showing off their body in some circumstances | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/02/26 12:25 PM |
| 4 | Feminists will do all sorts of mental gymnastics to avoid admitting that women objectify themselves whenever it's convenient, and would rather demonize male sexuality instead.In today's society, men like that can get women without making them uncomfortable, so why would they choose to do that? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/02/26 12:22 PM |
| 1 | There is no reason for women to ever believe “men feel love through sex”.I'm happy to address that. implicit values matter more than explicit values. You cannot derive anything about the implicit values of the average man in a relationship based on what you see on this niche internet forum. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/02/26 09:45 PM |
| 1 | There is no reason for women to ever believe “men feel love through sex”.“Watch what they do, not what they say” You mean "“Watch what they do, not what [reddit users on one subreddit] say [anomalously on a subreddit]”? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/02/26 09:09 PM |
| 1 | There is no reason for women to ever believe “men feel love through sex”.You're Makin up a bunch of reasons but saying that men can't tell you the reason that they like sex within relationships? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/02/26 08:52 PM |
| 1 | There is no reason for women to ever believe “men feel love through sex”.You seem to be saying that if sex can mean nothing in one instance, that means that sex never means anything | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/02/26 08:43 PM |
| 0 | There is no reason for women to ever believe “men feel love through sex”.Do you believe that actions can only have 1 meaning? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/02/26 07:28 PM |
| 4 | As a man, Why am I not allowed to argue with women?fair enough. these women are extremely rare, especially if you practice good judgement with the people you speak to and befriend | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/02/26 07:27 PM |
| 4 | As a man, Why am I not allowed to argue with women?how many experiences like this have you had? you believe the woman in this example is representative of average women? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/02/26 07:22 PM |
| 6 | As a man, Why am I not allowed to argue with women?Oh? So what situations have you seen where it was an unreasonable question? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/02/26 07:19 PM |
| 0 | There is no reason for women to ever believe “men feel love through sex”.What "guys want here" is not a monolyth at all, and even if it was, it does not prove that "sex has nothing to do with love". That is a ridiculous statement that requires a huge amount of evidence. Just biologically speaking it's pretty obvious that the 2 are strongly linked, not to mention the tightly related sociology of love and sex. I have no idea how that statement has anything to do with my example. Yes; a relationship will obviously fail if either party only cares about 1 thing, regardles… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/02/26 07:18 PM |
| 4 | As a man, Why am I not allowed to argue with women?which might be a very reasonable question depending on what the guy is arguing :) | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/02/26 07:10 PM |
| 1 | There is no reason for women to ever believe “men feel love through sex”.Your logic does not hold whatsoever: just because a person can do an action without feelings about that action, does not mean that the action cannot be a critical part of a relationship. Simple example: Washing the dishes can be done by and for a woman and it can mean very little to her. But for the same woman, if she's in a 30-year marriage, and her husband expects her to cook every night, she might be extremely agitated that he never does the dishes. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/02/26 06:43 PM |
| 4 | How Can We Hold Space for Male Victims of Violence While Acknowledging Women’s Safety Concerns in Dating?Oh? Ok I'm listening. What can you tell me about how women experiences acceptance and sympathy if she opens up to her friends and family about safety concerns or issues on a date? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/02/26 02:05 PM |
| 1 | The "Emotional Labor" Argument Is Wildly overplayed by women.Putting the cart before the horse there aren't we. Are you implying that there are no men in the world who do a large majority of house work? Or something else? Feel free to be clear. The person staying home is going to by default fall to the woman. You think there's tons of stay at home mom's today, or that it's primarily stay-at-home moms that are the ones complaining? You think that it's impossible to weaponize incompetence and knowingly let your partner do way more housework, even beyond wha… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/02/26 02:14 AM |
| 3 | How Can We Hold Space for Male Victims of Violence While Acknowledging Women’s Safety Concerns in Dating?Except that women are easily accepted and sympathized with about safety conditions and similar topics. So not sure where your generalized cynicism comes from? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/02/26 08:00 PM |
| 5 | The "Emotional Labor" Argument Is Wildly overplayed by women.obviously it's not a gender issue, though it may be that one gender is more likely to be on one side of the issue. this is a super common issue in relationships, so it isn't logical to just give up from this problem alone, unless you think you can definitely find someone better | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/02/26 05:10 PM |
| 3 | The "Emotional Labor" Argument Is Wildly overplayed by women.Sure. I was just saying that most couples don't sit down on day 1 and make a chore chart. Also, if the dishwasher is constantly coming up, there's likely a deeper issue at play. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/02/26 04:03 PM |
| 14 | The "Emotional Labor" Argument Is Wildly overplayed by women.If you don't understand that caregiving involves "the process of managing feelings and expression", then you need to stay 1000 feet away from managing or being a partner in any household | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/02/26 04:02 PM |
| 5 | The "Emotional Labor" Argument Is Wildly overplayed by women.That's not very common. For most couples, they just need to try to keep an open dialogue about their ongoing needs and tasks to balance things out when needed. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/02/26 03:41 PM |
| 2 | The "Emotional Labor" Argument Is Wildly overplayed by women.Men also become particular if they're forced to take over everything in the house. But when the other partner starts to take an active interest and starts to be proactive, and take jobs off the other person's shoulders, it becomes easier to relax. It's precisely when all the work is auto-assigned to one person that they are forced to become particular about things | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/02/26 03:40 PM |
| 18 | The "Emotional Labor" Argument Is Wildly overplayed by women.You don't think that caregiving involves a huge amount of emotional labor...? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/02/26 03:39 PM |
| 1 | The term "ran-though" needs to end.What an odd assumption. No, the dislike of insults has to do with the intent (to anger, abuse, disrespect, and provoke not communicate and understand) not the number of words involved. You're saying no and that I'm making an "odd assumption", but you are agreeing that you're not against particular words but rather intent. Since your statement of "No" disagrees with your follow up points, I can't really make sense of your reply. Insults are time and place appropriate and justifiable but I strongl… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/02/26 02:38 PM |
| 0 | The term "ran-though" needs to end.So you aren't opposed to gender-based criticisms when they're boiled down to a single derogatory phrase, is that right? So you only have issues with these types of phrases on a case-by-case basis, if you deem them to be used in a bad way? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/02/26 02:17 PM |
| 1 | The term "ran-though" needs to end.Do you have a problem with the usage of the term "mansplaining"? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/02/26 02:04 PM |
| 1 | The term "ran-though" needs to end.Normally you're comparing high n-count women not to virgins but to women who've had a BF or 2. If you're looking to compare extremes, then sure, there is some risk in dating a virgin that's worth taking into account as well. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 16/02/26 11:44 PM |
| 1 | The term "ran-though" needs to end.Ok so you accept that both men and women can found their dislike of promiscuity in jealousy. So what is your issue, simply the usage of derogatory language based on sex? or is your point simply that "derogatory language is bad"? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 16/02/26 11:34 PM |
| 1 | The term "ran-though" needs to end.Ok cool. I'm speaking to the people in this thread who are boiling down their argument to "sex-based derogatory phrases are bad", which is an ok position, but only if you are against phrases like mansplaining. Personally I agree with you—there's nothing wrong with (thoughtfully) using words like mansplaining, which can be sexist, but ultimately do describe a behavior that is more often committed by men than women. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 16/02/26 11:19 PM |
| 2 | The term "ran-though" needs to end.I think the folks arguing against "ran through" are retreating to their bailey, boiling down their argument to just "i don't like mean words" | /r/PurplePillDebate | 16/02/26 11:12 PM |
| 2 | The term "ran-though" needs to end.Are you referring to an online community? I know they exist, but I feel like it's unusual for people to IRL know a bunch of men's fetishes, much less to know a bunch of cucks in particular. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 16/02/26 11:10 PM |
| 1 | The term "ran-though" needs to end.So are you just simply against the use of gender-based derogatory terms? or against all derogatory terms? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 16/02/26 11:05 PM |
| 1 | The term "ran-though" needs to end.Ok yeah jealousy is part of it, but I think the core is that heavy sleeping around is just a red flag, like many other red flags that both men and women watch for on a first/second date | /r/PurplePillDebate | 16/02/26 11:00 PM |
| -4 | The term "ran-though" needs to end.So? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 16/02/26 10:59 PM |
| 3 | The term "ran-though" needs to end.Ah xD Did you fuck their wives multiple times so you could get in a groove, learn what they like, and really fuck them better than their husbands could ever hope to? Did you get to know the wives and build a strong connection? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 16/02/26 10:58 PM |
| 2 | The term "ran-though" needs to end.Obviously lol. And there's no point for you to point that out. Everyone already knows that a 5' man with a microdick and no job shouldn't be expecting a sensual bj from Sydney Sweeney every night. It's like if an NBA coach says "scoring points is important in basketball" and you say "actually, that's useless if you're 4' tall and very sick, because then you should just stay off the court or pass the ball" Like ok....what? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 16/02/26 10:48 PM |
| 4 | The term "ran-though" needs to end.> how are dick's not the thing that ruins the woman The thing that ruins them is the increased likelihood that the woman will be interested in increasing her n-count in the future. Is this a guarantee? No, but neither are any of the assumptions we are all forced to make in early dating. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 16/02/26 10:33 PM |
| 4 | The term "ran-though" needs to end.Do you? How did you meet these men and get them to admit this? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 16/02/26 10:32 PM |
| 10 | The term "ran-though" needs to end.> you're trusting Why would ultimately having to trust someone have anything to do with assessing green and red flags in an early relationship? Men and women never tell you everything on the first date. It's 100% necessary to make assumptions based on cues, which are sometimes subtle. The difference between a woman who's slept with 0 men vs. 100 men is not a subtle difference. Do you not think that the women are judging him right back, and making assumptions instead of just "trusting" him? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 16/02/26 10:31 PM |
| 11 | The term "ran-though" needs to end.Are you ideologically opposed to any derogatory term that is based on gender, such as mansplaining? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 16/02/26 10:29 PM |
| 9 | The term "ran-though" needs to end.> especially when the men who use it are actually just jealous Do you also believe that women who look for a low N-count man are "actually just jealous"? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 16/02/26 10:28 PM |
| 0 | The term "ran-though" needs to end.Both are highly subjective especially for different groups. But apparently you think even a "huge" amount of people isn't as "icky" as being bisexual, which seems strange. Do you not believe there is *any* number of sexual partners that women would find more icky than bisexuality? Also curious, are you aware how many women are currently obsessed and horny for gay hockey players? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 16/02/26 10:25 PM |
| -1 | The term "ran-though" needs to end.Sure, I'd be happy to rank those by biggest ick for women and curious what you think that proves. using a hooker running a huge amount of women (or more realistic, being known in the girl's community as a fuckboy and/or being known to have fucked ugly or otherwise undesirable women) bisexual running through a lot of women but not a huge amount, maybe 20-60 depending on the culture | /r/PurplePillDebate | 16/02/26 10:17 PM |
| 3 | The term "ran-though" needs to end.That's not really responsive to my statement, ie. you could say that about anything. For example, if I say it's reasonable for a woman to expect a man to wear deodorant on a date, you could reply by saying it's not reasonable *if the woman has no options of men who do wear deodorant*. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 16/02/26 10:13 PM |
| 4 | The term "ran-though" needs to end.The terminology is different, but women do judge men for sleeping around a lot. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 16/02/26 09:45 PM |
| 4 | The term "ran-though" needs to end.How is that not reasonable, assuming the man also has a low number of past sexual partners? It's not as if the average # of sexual partners is so high. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 16/02/26 09:44 PM |
| 1 | The term "ran-though" needs to end.> "Ran-through" comes from jealousy, first and foremost. Many women are also turned off by a man who sleeps around a lot, and I wouldn't say it's from jealousy at all. Moreso it's used as a marker of the person's possible social behaviour | /r/PurplePillDebate | 16/02/26 09:43 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter