TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

JoocyJ Archive

View 0 posts and 31 comments by JoocyJ on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Ok so I don’t understand your problem with men being concerned about whether or not their romantic partner is sexually compatible since you seem to be concerned about men kowtowing to your wants and needs.
/r/MensRights31/01/22 03:41 PM
1

Are you saying that sexual compatibility in a relationship/marriage shouldn’t be a concern?
/r/MensRights31/01/22 03:36 PM
2

Wanting out of a relationship because a man wants something you cannot provide does not make a man “indecent.” I’m glad you found someone who’s ok with what you want but you seem to have a weird contempt for male sexual desire. Like it or not, it’s an integral part of being human for most people, male or female, and it shows some immaturity that you’re shaming people for wanting it.
/r/MensRights31/01/22 03:27 PM
1

Look if you make it clear up front when meeting someone that you are not interested in sex, no man/woman is going to force or pressure you to do it. They’re either going to be cool with that or not. The problem is when the issue is revealed years into a marriage. You can’t expect a man/woman to forgo a basic pillar of a romantic relationship and then expect that relationship to last.
/r/MensRights31/01/22 02:43 PM
3

Ok so you need to be with someone who also doesn’t like sex. You can’t just stop having sex with your partner and expect them to be ok with that. Yes, of course you can say no but that’s eventually going to end the marriage in most cases.
/r/MensRights31/01/22 02:36 PM
33

Both gender and ethnicity were explicitly mentioned. He brought in asian men because they are the highest earning demographic by gender/ethnicity.
/r/MensRights29/12/21 03:11 AM
1

Not really. These laws have been in place for a long time and make some sense when you consider women in the mid 20th century gave up any hope for a career to be full time moms and would be unable to support themselves or a child in event of a divorce. Men often don’t get custody because of dated perceptions of gender roles. All of this has obviously changed quite a lot but the laws and sentiment have lagged behind.
/r/MensRights07/09/21 09:14 PM
0

It stands for “involuntary celibate” i.e. men who want to get laid but can’t. It used to be a subreddit where men who never spoke to women aside from their mothers deluded themselves into thinking they knew more about them than everyone else. Eventually it got banned because they had users advocating rape/violence.
/r/MensRights08/07/21 02:26 PM
1

Lol you started a “Lonely Men Club” subreddit and draw comics that reek of insecurity. Forgive me if I don’t believe you. And as for these women, I don’t know. Human beings are not a monolith and I’m not going to make generalizations about them based on nothing. I can say I think your hypothesis is almost certainly wrong since the most radical feminists who believe women should stop all interaction with men are usually gay.
/r/MensRights08/07/21 02:20 PM
2

Very few women hate men but I wouldn’t expect you to know that since you don’t talk to them very often.
/r/MensRights08/07/21 02:03 PM
-1

Get this incel shit out of here
/r/MensRights08/07/21 01:56 PM
3

“It was just a prank bro.” What about your comment was supposed to be funny?
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/21 02:34 AM
2

I’m assuming he had an engineering degree and you didn’t?
/r/MensRights12/08/20 02:10 PM
2

It would make more sense to clone at that point.
/r/MensRights13/07/20 05:23 AM
2

Uh what? How is that like incest? One female is used to produce sperm from their stem cells and the other just uses their natural eggs. The end result is not any different than with normal sexual reproduction except the technique can only produce females.
/r/MensRights13/07/20 05:17 AM
2

I don’t understand what you mean
/r/MensRights13/07/20 05:08 AM
2

Interesting, I wasn’t aware of this. Still more difficult than with two eggs but nearer to reality than I thought.
/r/MensRights11/07/20 09:57 PM
7

That will not preclude the need for women considering you still need an egg to do that. It is possible that we could artificially engineer them in the future but this will happen long after we are able to do same sex fertilization between females. Same sex fertilization between males is much further away.
/r/MensRights11/07/20 06:22 PM
84

In the maybe near future women will technically not need men to reproduce anymore. Luckily most women aren’t batshit crazy.
/r/MensRights11/07/20 04:03 PM
4

Not for long, same sex fertilization techniques have already been used successfully in mice.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/02/20 10:35 PM
1

I would encourage you to do more research on the people they bring on. In their video on the British Empire they platform a historian who wrote a book explicitly claiming that America would be better off if the South won the ACW. He also (in another book) sings the praises of a British Officer, Reginald Dyer, who ordered his troops to fire into peaceful Indian protesters without any warning. Almost 1,000 Indians died.
/r/MensRights23/06/19 02:44 AM
5

Lmao that glacier paper has to be some sort of elaborate satire.
/r/MensRights23/12/18 09:40 PM
-2

The editor clearly either didn't read her paper or is deliberately misrepresenting it. Even the most liberal feminist academic journal wouldn't publish something that asinine and intellectually vapid.
/r/MensRights23/12/18 08:46 PM
27

Yes and yes
/r/MensRights23/12/18 05:37 PM
86

Yeah she's pretty much trying to say that our current understanding of identity and social hierarchy is like Newtonian physics and we need to move to a more nuanced "quantum physics" understanding. Seems like a pretentious way to communicate a simple idea, but at least she's not attacking science as some sort of "oppressive" institution. As much as I hate it when laymen try to co-opt science to argue totally unrelated ideas, this is just dishonest reporting on the part of the National Review. Th…
/r/MensRights23/12/18 05:17 PM
42

Kind of. Her paper is really dumb, but the way they present it in the article makes it seem like she's attacking actual physics and she's not. The whole objective of her paper, in her words, is to apply the understandings of quantum physics to feminism and intersectionality. Now obviously she has no idea what she's talking about but she doesn't make any claims about physics in the context of actually modeling physical systems, just in their metaphorical application to social issues.
/r/MensRights23/12/18 04:06 PM
82

That's not even what she's saying if you read the article. I think she's trying to metaphorically apply both approaches to physics to sociology and feminism for some reason. I think I'm going to go read her actual paper because the presentation of her ideas in the article makes no fucking sense.
/r/MensRights23/12/18 04:01 PM
5

Go into google and type in height percentile. Enter 6'0" and you'll find that's roughly 80th percentile for males in the US.
/r/MensRights14/04/18 02:01 AM
7

you realize that 80% of the male population is under 6' and most manage to reproduce, right?
/r/MensRights14/04/18 01:45 AM
3

Hoes don't get cold https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ddSpvTGRkzk
/r/PussyPassDenied09/01/18 04:00 AM
2

A broken clock is right twice a day.
/r/MensRights30/10/17 10:48 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter