TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Jos_Metadi Archive

View 1 post and 150 comments by Jos_Metadi on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
174

Jos_Metadi/r/MGTOW03/08/17 02:59 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
20

Not against victims; against uncorroborated accusers. The false accusers and virtual lynch mobs have cried wolf so much that actual victims are facing more skepticism.
/r/MensRights21/10/18 01:28 AM
4

That post is nothing BUT red flags.
/r/MGTOW220/10/18 01:06 AM
6

It's like asking for advice on how to butcher a cow in a vegan forum. Legitimate question, but completely wrong audience.
/r/MGTOW220/10/18 01:06 AM
1

Including the demands she made when negotiating the hearing, it's 9/10 red flags from that by my count. Plus the other 2 I added.
/r/MensRights09/10/18 12:38 PM
6

One of the lower claimed percentages is 5% (actually false, not just unprovable). That's 1 in 20. Pretty far from "extremely rare". Other studies put the percentage much higher, including data from the FBI crime stats. When it comes to a legal case, the accused is always innocent until proven guilty. That's not something that could be compromised even if the false accusation rate was 1 in a 1000. When it comes to rumors and public opinion, make sure you exercise judgement and common sense. It's …
/r/MensRights09/10/18 02:41 AM
13

There is no guaranteed way to protect yourself completely, but here are some things that will help. Document any incidents, including any comments she makes that either seem overly friendly or hostile. Keep yourself on surveillance cameras as much as possible. Never share your calendar/schedule with a woman that would reveal times you don't have alibis for. Never spend any time alone with any woman in any setting without video recordings that get saved long term. Always cc a neutral 3rd party on…
/r/MensRights07/10/18 10:10 PM
19

No one has any problem with women defending themselves from rapists and shooting them dead. Can't shoot a false accuser. No one can retroactively go back in time and rape you. You only have to worry about protecting yourself in the present and the men actually around you. Someone can falsely accuse you years or decades later and they don't even have to have been in the same room as you. You have to worry about any moment that you don't have video recording or an alibi of without knowing when it …
/r/MensRights07/10/18 12:54 AM
4

Ironically, people who claim we have to trust all women ARE the reason not to trust any woman. When the majority admit that some women are liars, men can feel safe trusting most people because they feel like they have a chance to defend themselves against false accusations. When the majority say that women don't make false accusations then a smart man will do his best to avoid all women rather than risk being destroyed by one false accusation that the community will blindly accept.
/r/MensRights02/10/18 03:03 AM
1

https://thefederalist.com/2018/09/25/10-red-flags-sexual-assault-claims-employment-lawyer/ If I thought there was even a 1% chance that the allegations were true, I wouldn't want him on the court. But there's zero evidence, zero corroborating testimony, no location or time for the police to investigate, no witnesses to question, no police report, no one in her family or teachers noticed any change in behavior, etc. So no positive evidence against him. Her accusations (plus demands she made for t…
/r/MGTOW228/09/18 03:37 PM
13

I understand your point. If the only way they can relate and care about the falsely accused is to imagine it were a family member, it does say something about them. But it's still better than them not caring at all.
/r/MensRights28/09/18 03:18 AM
5

I agree that hearings weren't the ideal method. The senate should have told Ford and Feinstein to take it to the Montgomery PD, file an official statement with details that could be investigated. If the PD needed assistance, offer the help of the FBI. If she's unwilling to do that much, then she doesn't deserve the airtime of a hearing.
/r/MensRights28/09/18 02:46 AM
2

Wow. Youngsters self-identify as the weirdest things these days. /s
/r/MensRights28/09/18 02:41 AM
13

They did 6 background investigations and came up with nothing. How can they investigate further without a specific time and place, and without people who were actually present to interview?
/r/MensRights28/09/18 02:29 AM
9

Challenge Ford on changing story. Put the people she claimed were witnesses to confirm that she had no corroboration. Read the 10 red flags of sexual assault allegations right after her testimony https://thefederalist.com/2018/09/25/10-red-flags-sexual-assault-claims-employment-lawyer/ Refuse to let any accuser have a hearing if they don't have a contemporary police report to go with it.
/r/MensRights28/09/18 02:26 AM
13

And if there isn't, we must never again vote for any democrat who would smear an innocent man and deny presumption of innocence.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 03:02 PM
13

When someone says something like this, flip the gender or race and repeat it back to them. If it pisses them off, they're a hypocrital bigot.
/r/MensRights24/06/18 03:48 AM
13

Legal parental surrender by men would be the balance to the current right of abortion or surrendering for adoption by women. This is because women currently have more rights than men. If you want to require men to have to get permission from the mother to gain their fatherhood, then justice would require women getting men's permission to keep the baby. Does this sound messed up to you? It certainly does to me.
/r/MensRights23/06/18 07:31 PM
24

Ask them if they're okay with campaigns to "teach african-americans not to murder", or "teach women not to make false accusations". Those are equally as bigoted, presumptuous. There are bad people in every group, but they aren't bad BECAUSE they are part the group. Is anyone really dumb enough to claim that rapists rape because they don't know any better? The truth is that there is evil in the world, and some people choose to be evil. They need salvation in order to change, not education. If you…
/r/MensRights18/06/18 11:27 PM
6

Clearly the solution is to falsely imprison more women so the number can end up equal /s
/r/MensRights16/06/18 02:43 AM
10

You forgot the /s tag
/r/MensRights15/06/18 12:27 AM
1

I'm a Christian and it's pretty common to hear from religious feminists. The caveat is they don't claim to be feminists, they just agree with the tenets of all but the most extreme secular feminists.
/r/MensRights09/06/18 01:13 AM
28

Similar, but three relevant differences. If a woman gets raped, the justice system is on her side working hard to punish her attacker. If a man gets falsely accused, it isn't and will actively defend his attacker. It doesn't happen to be the women he's actually meeting with that accuses him. He can be accused by someone not even present. A woman can't be raped by a man who isn't there. There is no extra incentive to rape besides a persons evil desires. There are financial and social incentives t…
/r/MensRights07/06/18 02:09 AM
33

Social ostracization from slander even if no formal accusation Risk of job loss Losing gun-rights without a trial
/r/MensRights06/06/18 04:13 AM
9

You can't believe the first part, or the response picture showing how absurd the first part is?
/r/PussyPassDenied18/10/17 09:06 PM
2

Men are better than women at being men. Women are better than men at being women.
/r/MensRights16/09/17 11:46 PM
2

There are those who believe that negative rights are freedom and there are those who are wrong.
/r/MGTOW14/09/17 03:23 AM
2

I've been cutting my own for many years. It's mostly a matter of practice, but rigging up mirrors so you can see the back while cutting makes doing the edges and fades easier.
/r/MGTOW10/09/17 12:13 PM
21

I would consider Gorusch to be another. You know that if Hillary had won we would get another SJW activist judge on the supreme court and there's no way that would turn out decently for any case involving men fighting for their civil rights.
/r/MGTOW09/09/17 09:11 PM
8

What I've tended to notice in many books by women authors is a lack of agency in their "heroes". Most of the time the main character just has stuff happen to them beyond their control, and they react to it. Rarely do they take full responsibility for themselves or their environment and proactively act to solve problems or fight a villain. Doesn't matter the gender of the main character either. A second pattern is how easily controlled the protagonist is by the antagonist's words. They are quick …
/r/MGTOW31/08/17 01:18 AM
1

If the kids aren't in school yet, or are being homeschooled, I think SAHM is still a job (and a noble one at that).
/r/MGTOW28/08/17 11:18 PM
2

I'm 3 months away from polishing off my debts.
/r/MGTOW14/08/17 10:09 PM
7

Once a month, I cook a meal that's free and open to anyone in the community who needs some food or just some human contact. Started doing it back during the worst of the recent recession. Get folk who are down on their luck financially, older folk who don't get out much and need some company, and lately I've been inviting the guys from a local teen challenge (drug recovery program) who need to feel like they can be a part of society without always being judged.
/r/MGTOW14/08/17 02:25 AM
42

Can cats really be described as innocent though?
/r/MGTOW13/08/17 03:48 AM
2

Illogical and contemptuous, but stilling expecting to be chosen and supported anyway. Sounds familiar.
/r/MGTOW12/08/17 02:03 PM
1

You can't fix a codependent relationship. You can only decide not to enable it anymore by cutting off your support. Right now trying to stay and fix things is just enabling society and women to continue to exploit men. I do agree on the stop whining part. Point out double-standards, call people on their bs, then walk away.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 01:48 AM
2

To conquer problems, tame wilderness, and create new things from nothing.
/r/MGTOW05/08/17 10:42 PM
1

Thanks. Maybe I should have used the word vulnerability instead of weakness. Yes, people have tried to say that men who don't want to put up with being treated like garbage are weak or pathetic. It's basically an argument that we don't have the right to have feelings or defend ourselves. I disagree with that position strongly. We have every right to feel angry, and having that emotion does NOT mean that we are weak or contemptible. I view anger kind of like adrenaline, it has an important functi…
/r/MGTOW03/08/17 09:22 PM
1

Correct you are
/r/MGTOW03/08/17 02:48 PM
2

It's more don't stay angry, but it's about some of the why's. There are many how's, but they all start with first deciding to let it go.
/r/MGTOW03/08/17 02:08 PM
2

I agree that anger itself isn't bad. It's a justified natural reaction to being treated with contempt, taken advantage of, and then discarded like yesterday's garbage. But it can make you vulnerable, and holding on to it can hurt you. One thing I've seen is that some woman will deliberately do everything they can to torment and enrage their guy enough to hit them. Then they play the innocent victim and he gets a permanent domestic violence mark on his record and can easily lose his right to bear…
/r/MGTOW03/08/17 01:51 PM
7

I haven't posted on facebook for about 2 years. About once a month I'll go on and look at new pictures of my nieces and nephews (since they're far away from me), then exit.
/r/MGTOW02/08/17 09:47 PM
9

Do you ever want to tell feminists "my days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle".
/r/MensRights01/08/17 11:24 PM
1

That's why is pussypassdenied, not pussypassrevoked. Because she can always try it again with a different audience.
/r/MGTOW30/07/17 02:28 PM
1

I don't watch many of those vids, but the ones I have seen are you usually something like "please don't go, we/society need you". There is little concern or compassion for us as people, just a realization that us leaving will mean they lose something they've been taking for granted. Plus the (feigned) willingness to respect us our and our services next time.
/r/MGTOW30/07/17 12:36 PM
6

I hadn't heard about the top 5 women automatically advancing. That actually does make it unfair and sexist in women's favor.
/r/MensRights26/07/17 02:29 PM
11

The media is being deliberately dishonest and sexist. American ninja warrior is perfectly fair because men and women compete on the exact same course in the same time limits.
/r/MensRights26/07/17 05:13 AM
17

I'm working on replacing a faucet. Plumbing is definitely not my specialty, so wish me luck. After that I'm upgrading my main work environment from python 3.5 to 3.6 to take advantage of the improvements to native dictionaries.
/r/MGTOW22/07/17 03:09 AM
95

Good for her. Unfortunately, she's about to find out what her fellow feminists are really like.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 05:51 PM
18

No. We should let them be. The more their helpless victim masks slip, the more other men will see and wake up.
/r/MGTOW12/07/17 05:57 PM
1

It would require a nineveh-level, mass repentance, mindset change. I wouldn't bet on it happening.
/r/MGTOW09/07/17 05:36 PM
35

Runaway slaves are harmful to a culture built on slave labor too. I think it's both intellectually disingenuous and moral vacuous to blame the escapees instead of those who built the system and the parasites who feed on it. I grew up in church too, and have watched too many girls I initially thought might be different turn into single moms in church on sunday because they slept around the rest of the week, or stop coming altogether because were dating and living with non-christian guys. Then are…
/r/MGTOW09/07/17 02:37 AM
37

If the results were reversed, you can bet they would be demanding gender blind recruitment be made into law.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 04:27 PM
9

If all the men left, all future problems would be blamed on men for deserting them.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 11:34 PM
4

She's pulling a motte and bailey.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 11:12 PM
20

The problem with the feminist movement is that it's impossible to separate the Motte from the Bailey. http://minx.cc:1080/?post=370373
/r/MensRights25/06/17 05:59 PM
3

This is MGTOW, not AskMen. We no longer believe in fairy tales or unicorns or women like that. The question is a distraction from the reality that we are the only one we can each count on to build our individual futures and happiness.
/r/MGTOW24/06/17 04:38 AM
2

Not sure I'd want to move big furniture in or out with that staircase and turn at the top. If the garage is for hobbies/projects, would you want to have internal access to it?
/r/MGTOW24/06/17 12:09 AM
3

I appreciate her gratitude for the civilization that men have helped build. It's a good start towards realizing that men aren't women's enemies. But there are still too many cultural, social and legal factors for it to be rational to not be a MGTOW. I won't believe the gender war is over until women start fighting against the harm done to men because we're fellow humans, instead of caring just because our absence will deprive them of protectors/providers/creators.
/r/MGTOW24/06/17 12:01 AM
2

Wonder if this will make anyone think twice about the morality of abortion, that it's only a small accidental loophole away from normal murder.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 10:44 PM
9

Been there, tried that. Still got treated with cruelty and contempt.
/r/MGTOW23/06/17 10:35 PM
1

They have a whole subreddit dedicated to hating on it.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 01:01 PM
9

In the sense that it's accusing a guy of refusing to grow up
/r/MensRights23/06/17 04:45 AM
13

Neckbeard Nice guy Peter Pan
/r/MensRights23/06/17 04:34 AM
4

Freedom from responsibility for her physical security, for her financial stability, and even for her emotional happiness.
/r/MGTOW21/06/17 08:49 PM
29

I guess they are committed to the narrative that normal men are the enemy, and so male must either be portrayed as brutish, or act completely like women.
/r/MGTOW19/06/17 03:20 AM
3

If they're going to keep using a bot to ban, they should at least limit it to users who have posted there at least once in the past.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/06/17 04:54 AM
11

Because if people accept it, then any attempt by a man to defend himself against against her slander can be used as "proof" he is weak.
/r/MGTOW03/06/17 05:15 PM
10

Pointing out absurd double standards and hypocrisy isn't "flipping out". Somebody is trying to gin up a controversy to sell more movie tickets to what will probably be yet another dud.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 11:29 PM
6

Right-wingers aren't immune to hate or crazy, but the media has been desperately trying to smear all conservatives as deranged since the tea party was first started. They're bound to be to find a nutjob eventually, but if there were any kind of actual pattern of violence from small government republicans and libertarians they would have found it long ago. Meanwhile they celebrate leftists rioting in multiple US cities where leftist thugs attack police, peaceful counter-protesters, business owner…
/r/MensRights30/05/17 02:57 AM
3

"This hate is perpetuated by some republicans... The hater on the train was likely a result of that political rhetoric." - Carbo-Raider "Don't get polarized (one side against another)" - Carbo-Raider Heh, that's some short-term memory you got there. There are plenty of "snowflakes" who riot, threaten, and assault cops, private citizens, and legislators. https://pjmedia.com/trending/2017/05/29/texas-state-rep-reports-protesters-to-ice-guess-what-happened-next/ http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/11/us/ore…
/r/MensRights29/05/17 11:56 PM
19

The hater/stabber was a mentally ill Sanders/Stein supporter who previously admitted to false flag operations to smear conservatives. He tried attending a free speech event by Trump supporters, but was not only kicked out by reported to the police. Blaming his violence on the political rhetoric instead of mental problems isn't helping. Blaming it on the right instead of the left is just plain dishonest. http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/05/update-portland-killer-voted-bernie-reported-trump-su…
/r/MensRights29/05/17 09:39 PM
46

On the flip side, there are 70-80 year old women who grew up in a culture where both men and women contributed different things to marriage, where women learned to be modest and gentle and supportive and kind and respectful. They may be past their physical prime, but they are still more beautiful than any bitter 30 year old feminist, and I don't think their husbands would trade them for a dozen supermodels.
/r/MGTOW27/05/17 10:05 PM
3

So you're saying they behave like a caricature?
/r/MGTOW25/05/17 12:42 AM
36

The outcome
/r/PussyPassDenied22/05/17 01:48 AM
1

An alternate reality with different social and legal frameworks OR completely losing my mind to the point of becoming irrational and amnesiac.
/r/MGTOW19/05/17 12:57 AM
15

Never, and they don't. It's like talking nicely to dog while you're trying to put it back on a leash.
/r/MensRights14/05/17 02:49 AM
1

You're confusing education and schooling.
/r/MGTOW04/05/17 03:04 PM
13

It's smart to avoid debt, and even smarter to avoid newly brain-washed feminists. Education is very important. If you're going your own way, you need to take responsibility for arranging the opportunities for yourself to learn. These can be internships, volunteer work, entry level jobs, online courses, old fashioned books, freelance tutors, etc. Having a degree makes it easier to apply for some computer jobs. But even without it, if you have relevant skill certificates, references from previous …
/r/MGTOW03/05/17 09:27 PM
6

She was female-qualified which translates as she was married to someone qualified and thinks that means she now possesses his ability and experience.
/r/MGTOW02/05/17 09:40 PM
3

In my opinion, there are two dimensions that generally divide women into 3 groups. One dimension is how aware and self-honest about needing men and men's resources like strength, resources, protection, justice. The second and even more important dimension is a commitment to mutual exchange; that they have to offer something of equal value to men in exchange for what they want from them. This is what is now sorely lacking in women today, and neither taught nor enforced nor even praised in modern …
/r/MGTOW29/04/17 04:03 PM
11

IMO, there is a large gulf between what they could offer and what they do offer.
/r/MGTOW28/04/17 01:06 PM
5

Both
/r/MensRights18/04/17 07:08 PM
2

Weak, fragile and egotistical.
/r/MGTOW07/04/17 09:38 PM
16

America - where even the scam bots are fat
/r/MGTOW28/03/17 03:08 AM
4

It's worth considering what crime series have in common with another entertainment formula, romance novels. They are both hyper-formulaic genres. The names and locations and specifics change, but other than that, it's a retelling of the same plot over and over again.
/r/MGTOW26/02/17 01:12 AM
9

When someone doesn't let legitimate setbacks and weaknesses become excuses, they can accomplish almost anything. Personal responsibility is the foundation of success.
/r/MGTOW22/11/16 12:48 AM
25

I wonder how effective it is for women with female bosses.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/11/16 12:45 AM
6

Congrats and your new personal best for bench, and on maintaining your guard and caution in the jacuzzi.
/r/MGTOW19/11/16 09:41 PM
1

I think you're disputing points I'm not actually trying to make. White men aren't the source of all the evils in history, but we haven't been immune to being intolerant either. Many have used religion as the excuse to be intolerant, while others used class envy, racism, tribalism. In my opinion it's the culture/philosophies from greece/rome joined with those of the iroquois, plus the new notion that rights belong to the individual instead of the nobility, plus judeo-christian ethics that have ma…
/r/MGTOW12/11/16 08:05 PM
1

I was thinking of all the times the european protestants and catholics took turns killing and oppressing each other, and both oppressing the local jews. That's why having no state religion was so important to Americas founders even though most were personally devout. The notion that muslims were tolerant back then is not backed up by history. The difference is that they never reformed and remain as intolerant as ever.
/r/MGTOW12/11/16 01:43 PM
16

Poor little guy just found out how shallow a woman's love can be.
/r/MensRights12/11/16 02:06 AM
4

They certainly are now. Middle ages Europe seemed a lot different.
/r/MGTOW11/11/16 09:32 PM
8

She does care. Very much. Just not about you.
/r/MGTOW05/11/16 10:54 PM
7

Not my problem
/r/MGTOW05/11/16 04:51 PM
3

Step 1: avoid women. There is no step 2
/r/MGTOW04/11/16 07:20 PM
6

That's easy. No.
/r/MensRights21/10/16 01:10 PM
5

It puts an asterisk next to it. This is because while you intend to keep going your own way, society has a leash on you and force you into indentured servitude using things like child support laws (even if it's not your kid), common law marriage, or any sexual assault charge you can't concretely disprove. If the leash never gets yanked, you'll still feel free as another man going his own way. But piss the wrong female or enabler and you'll discover the painful difference. We're not your parents …
/r/MGTOW21/10/16 03:25 AM
2

If you're having sex with a woman, society has a leash on you. It may not be taut, but it's attached. It's still your choice. Just be careful and minimize your risk to what you find acceptable.
/r/MGTOW21/10/16 03:11 AM
70

That's because according to women, females who ride the bus are hard working lower class while men who ride the bus are low-status and thus creepy.
/r/MGTOW20/10/16 12:38 PM
3

Direct your anger towards principles, not people. Let it drive and guard you, not consume you.
/r/MGTOW14/10/16 12:30 PM
3

I'm guessing they have cause and effect reversed.
/r/MensRights02/10/16 03:21 PM
1

The privilege of being less likely to be charged and convicted, and to receive much lower sentences for the same crime. Can be a stay-at-home parent without the rest of society judging and telling their spouse to divorce them. Can divorce on a whim and usually get the kids and the house and financial support.
/r/MensRights30/09/16 11:43 PM
1

They aren't
/r/MGTOW24/09/16 02:33 AM
3

I've still never heard a persuasive argument against the equation Heinlein proposed that power must equal responsibility and vice versa. Since to vote is to wield the ultimate power over the state, the equal responsibility is bear the burden of risking your life for the state.
/r/MGTOW22/09/16 10:38 PM
3

The only true MGTOW are those who forsake even having sex with women. Anything else is MGTOW* with an asterisk because if you are sleeping with a woman then our gynocentric civilization has a leash that it can use to force you to work to support her and any offspring she claims are yours (or imprison you, which is also not going your own way). If you are living at the same address with a woman, it can claim that you have a common law marriage, and again you are forced out of going your own way.
/r/MGTOW19/09/16 03:05 AM
1

My opinion is that the methods aren't anti-feminist at all. Double standards, psychological manipulation, and exploitation are right up their alley. There are plenty of feminists who hate anything resembling traditional romance or having other women place importance on finding a man. In this sense, the goal of helping women to ensnare a man into a monogamous relationship is anti-feminist.
/r/MensRights15/09/16 11:19 PM
1

I would divide your question in two; are the methods espoused in The Rules anti-feminist, and are the goals behind the methods anti-feminist.
/r/MensRights15/09/16 10:58 PM
1

Programming involving machine learning/statistical models/physics engines. Naval architecture, aeronautical/aerospace/computer hardware engineering. While there are still some women in these fields, it is a relatively small percentage compared to other skilled fields requiring more rote memorization or language skills (like law or general business or advertising).
/r/MGTOW06/09/16 04:18 AM
1

If you can afford it, either start your own business or work at a small startup. Otherwise try any discipline requiring hard math/science skills or a job as blue collar skilled labor or as a heavy manual labor contractor. Women gravitate towards jobs requiring less physical effort (retail and office) that are physically safe and financially stable (not startups) and don't require lots of engineering/math.
/r/MGTOW06/09/16 03:59 AM
11

Men are trained from infancy to understand that no one really cares what they feel, so they have to learn to use something else (force,exchange,reason) to get want they want/need. Therefore emotions become an obstacle to overcome and so we learn to control them them. Women are trained that their feelings matter. If they cry or complain, people will try harder to comfort/protect/provide for them. In my opinion, this tends to divide women into two groups. The first group primarily learns not to co…
/r/MGTOW06/09/16 03:23 AM
4

Jesus definitely went his/Gods own way. So did Paul for that matter.
/r/MGTOW05/09/16 04:11 AM
2

Quite
/r/MGTOW25/08/16 04:23 AM
4

If most of a society turned cannibal and starting feed on the rest and a few sane people decided to run away rather than be eaten, do you think it would be their fault if cannibals started going hungry?
/r/MGTOW25/08/16 12:51 AM
5

Given the number of suspicious deaths of witnesses and investigators around Clinton, it's probable that she had a much more direct role than that. Edit: There's a saying. "Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. Three times is enemy action." I have no idea what you would call 46 times. http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/another-clinton-associate-found-dead-bill-hillarys-body-count-increases/
/r/MensRights24/08/16 12:48 AM
14

This is my opinion. I realize others view the groups differently. Red Pill means you've woken up to the truth that men and women are different and therefore expecting women to act like men will never work. Their brains work differently, they have different priorities and goals. Women are no more virtuous than men, and absolutely will use you to get what they value if they can. Within Red Pill, there are two large groups. They both see that society is designed to give the majority of men the shaf…
/r/MGTOW03/08/16 12:00 AM
2

I think he was dead-on in pointing out the need to balance the equation of power and responsibility in how society is governed in Starship Troopers.
/r/MGTOW17/07/16 08:47 PM
1

Talking isn't doing.
/r/MGTOW17/07/16 01:20 AM
11

Women marry jerks thinking they will turn into nice guys. They don't. Men marry nice girls thinking they will stay sweet. They don't.
/r/MGTOW16/07/16 02:24 PM
7

Bet their competition is rejoicing right now.
/r/MGTOW01/07/16 09:53 PM
1

"Websites are turned off. An administrator can turn them on using the Server application" Not the most useful link... SJW - social justice warriors (3 words, 3 lies) AWALT - all women are like that NAWALT - not all women are like (what most guys think until the woman he likes shows her real nature)
/r/MGTOW24/06/16 04:27 AM
13

There's no such thing as being too young to make sure to protect yourself, your reputation, and your future.
/r/MGTOW21/06/16 02:00 PM
3

Welcome to the libertarian party! There is plenty of room here for people with different beliefs and lifestyles as long as they are willing to extend the same freedom to others.
/r/TheRedPill16/06/16 09:07 PM
2

Buying off the barbarians didn't work for Rome in its latter days, didn't work for the Danish paying the danegeld against the Viking barbarians, didn't protect the Angkor Wat against the Ayutthaya, didn't protect Europe against the Nazis in WWII, etc. It doesn't even work against school bullies, much less committed fanatics.
/r/TheRedPill16/06/16 09:05 PM
2

Blue pill is based on a lot on fear. So those who operate under its auspices cower and grovel and hope that appeasement and submission will buy survival or even favor.
/r/TheRedPill16/06/16 08:45 PM
8

If a group is based on principles, members can hold each other accountable when they stray from them. They can also jointly decide when methods or goals would violate those principles. If a group is based on goals, then its principles are whatever it takes to achieve those goals. Members can judge each other by their effectiveness in achieving those goals, even when it requires violating personal principles. If a group is based solely on an identity, then members can't legitimately exclude anyon…
/r/MensRights11/06/16 08:13 PM
3

What they could offer are the qualities that complement a man's strengths. Gentleness to go with his toughness. The ability to create beauty to go with his ability to create function. Encouragement to go with his drive to excel. Social graces with the community to go with his independence. But instead they are focused on trying to be like men, and when they fail (because they don't have the same set of strengths needed for the role) they demand that the world be changed by men to protect them fr…
/r/MGTOW11/06/16 04:58 AM
2

http://www.someecards.com/usercards/viewcard/a6161d112b0329ac57638de0a9c7b262
/r/MGTOW02/06/16 09:50 PM
5

It doesn't have to be 100% of them to make the risk/reward equation unpalatable. From I've personally experienced, what I hear from men that they experience, what I hear women saying about how they view other men, etc, I don't believe that women actually like most men for who they as people. And yes, I know you can use psychology and material wealth to turn women on, make them think they can gain status and security by being with you, but that still doesn't mean they actually like, love or respe…
/r/MGTOW27/05/16 09:10 PM
3

Assume they're like what?
/r/MGTOW27/05/16 08:56 PM
3

The short answer is that men tend to be able distinguish between words and actions, and trust actions more. We experience women behaving very differently than they claim with regards to who they're attracted to, how they treat men who show any weakness, how they aren't loyal to their partners, how they will exploit social structures to harm a man's reputation, etc. Some men decide that turn-about is fair play and become pickup artists to exploit what women really desire in order to fulfill their…
/r/TheRedPill27/05/16 01:50 PM
29

36 and virgin here. I don't want to get married to someone who despises me as someone to be used until she gets bored, and I won't have sex outside of marriage for religious reasons. That leaves celibacy.
/r/MGTOW27/05/16 03:39 AM
2

"I haven't met anyone worth marrying." Edit: Decided to add the rational behind the answer. It directly states that there is a pro/con evaluation for men regarding marriage, and that the cost/negatives outweigh the benefits/positives. It doesn't make you seem gay, neuter, or beta like the statements "I'm not looking for a wife", "I don't date", "I don't have a girlfriend". It declares a limited position of strength that you recognize that your life belongs to you to allocate where you want, and …
/r/MGTOW22/05/16 06:09 PM
5

People always think they can punish and shame men into making the sacrifice of marriage, but refuse to consider making it more attractive/worthwhile for them.
/r/MGTOW22/05/16 05:13 PM
3

Best way to close the wage gap: require women to fill a quota in STEM field studies before any are allowed in gender studies classes.
/r/MensRights19/05/16 04:01 AM
20

When the church preaches feminism and condemns men for being male, men stop leading, then stop volunteering, then stop coming. Unlike women, men don't shout that they are going to boycott unless things change. They let their actions speak for them and leave.
/r/TheRedPill15/05/16 06:17 PM
4

I agree. Please include a summary or your own comment in your reddit post along with the link.
/r/MGTOW04/05/16 01:01 AM
5

To understand how men view things, you have to be able to discern the difference between what people claim they stand for and what they actually do. Feminists claim to be for equality, but their actions paint a very different view of their beliefs. Here is what feminism really is as defined by the actions of those who wear the label: Painting all men as evil. From the assumption that women never make false accusations to creating a society where any man who works with children is treated as a po…
/r/MensRights28/04/16 05:18 PM
8

Ayn Rand explained it best. The goal of an authoritarian police state is having enough laws that every single man is guilty of breaking some so that the state can prosecute anyone on a whim.
/r/MensRights22/04/16 02:48 AM
10

Women are fainting flowers who can't handle confrontation or even disagreement and need to be protected from reality at all times... according to "feminists".
/r/MensRights15/02/16 09:58 PM
1

Hmm. That seems more PUA than RedPill to me, but whatever works for you. Telling her your expectations sets validation because women are unused to anyone demanding anything of them. It shows that you're different because your romance is conditional on what she does and must be earned. That doesn't seem like a big deal to a man because we're used to the world always working that way for us.
/r/TheRedPill06/02/16 08:31 PM
-2

You're not listening. You shouldn't be suggest going dutch at all. You tell her what you expect of someone you're going out with. E.g. "I only pay for the date if my date's gonna kiss/fool around/put out." If she doesn't want to do that, she can suggest doing dutch instead (and then you can decide if you want her as a friend, or call up a different girl instead).
/r/TheRedPill06/02/16 08:17 PM
0

It's time to bring it up before you even go out on a date by laying your expectations of her in the open. You're taking her out with expectations of romance and/or sex. If she's not gonna be into that, then don't go on the date to begin with. RedPill isn't just not jumping through shit-tests to get her validation, it's making her seek your validation as someone worth your time and effort.
/r/TheRedPill06/02/16 08:10 PM
0

Paying for dinner isn't submissive, it's assumptive. You're assuming that she'll accept your provision, taking charge without asking, expecting that she'll provide something of value in return. The irrationality of doing it comes from the expectation that she'll live up to the traditional social role with romance or sex instead of just using you. Suggesting going dutch after the meal is male-feminist because you're saying that you expect her to be an equal financial provider and have accepted th…
/r/TheRedPill06/02/16 08:05 PM
-3

I'm new to the RedPill concept, but this doesn't seem to be following it. Waiting till the end to suggest doing dutch is both making yourself appear less financially secure and like a beta male-feminist. Both these qualities are extremely unattractive to women. It seems like RedPill would be asking her ahead of time what she'll give/do in exchange for you paying for the date. If she wants to suggest going dutch instead, that's on her. But if she wants you to pay, she's got to bring something els…
/r/TheRedPill06/02/16 07:50 PM
18

I think it's the result of the irrational affirmation kids get at school and home. The big difference between the genders shows up later when men start getting some sense pounded into their skulls that they aren't special, their untrained talent isn't valued, and they won't get anything they don't work long and hard for. Women, especially reasonably attractive ones, are protected from facing reality or consequences and so the unfounded self-esteem lingers.
/r/TheRedPill20/01/16 09:44 PM
4

There is a difference between an accusation that can't be proven and an accusation that is proven false. I think both identities should be protected if the accusation can't be proven; the accuser's identity if it can be proven; and the accused's identity if the accusation can be proven false.
/r/MensRights14/01/16 11:20 PM
3

From what I've read, Mars will be the much easier planet to colonize. True it's relatively barren, but the environment of Venus could be described as actively hostile.
/r/MensRights10/01/16 07:13 PM
5

No, it doesn't match the law. If a women has sex with a boy under the age of consent it is frequency ruled to not be rape. If both parties are drunk, only the man is judged to be guilty of rape. As bad as the chart is, reality is worse.
/r/MensRights08/01/16 09:21 PM
4

You cannot compare and validate/disprove logic if you cannot communicate it using shared precise language. You cannot have a shared language if you don't have the same vocabulary (what certain words mean). You cannot have the same vocabulary if one person's definitions are inconsistent. It is useless for me to debate women being equal (having the same value) with a feminist who one minute think equal means have the same resources available to them, another minute thinks that equal means ending u…
/r/MensRights05/01/16 10:58 PM
15

Logic is based on rhetoric, rhetoric is based on vocabulary. Women in general, and feminists in particular don't use words to mean what their actual definitions are, but as emotional statements. For example "you never take me out" doesn't mean you've never taken her out, just that you haven't taken her out as recently or often as she wants. Similarly "you're being unfair" can mean "I don't like that you're holding me to the same standard I hold you". Unless you can get her to agree to debate sol…
/r/MensRights05/01/16 07:26 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter