TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

JoseJimeniz Archive

View 0 posts and 65 comments by JoseJimeniz on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

I don't like the idea of criminalizing thought. One manslaughter is no better or worse than another.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/04/20 03:02 PM
-8

People laugh when they're nervous, or don't know how to process the information. Cut them some slack.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/10/18 03:54 PM
2

As someone who does not have children I should not be responsible for other peoples bad decisions. As someone who does not have children, and does not want children, I should be responsible for other people's bad decisions. The child has done nothing wrong, and should not be punished. In the meantime, society is selfish and has decided that the father needs to pay. And that means they have to pay. we don't care how you pay we don't care why you can't pay but you must pay the child has no choice …
/r/MensRights20/09/18 12:33 PM
3

Men should not be paying child support. Everyone's taxes should be raised so we all pay for everyone's children.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 11:39 PM
18

I hope people don't misunderstand something: someone being found not-guilty of rape doesn't mean the accusation was false In order to convict someone you need evidence. Quite often there is no evidence; or it is he-said she-said. Just because there is no evidence doesn't mean the accuser is lying. you need evidence to convict someone of rape and you need evidence to convict someone of making a false statement And if a statement couldn't be proven true doesn't mean that it's false. Evidence. Bonu…
/r/PussyPassDenied30/05/18 11:09 PM
1

What is the school doing denying their scholarship or expelling them? A university should be taking no action against anyone accused of sexual assault: they don't have subpoena power they can't put people under oath Leave investigation, and judgement to the professionals. Universities stick to your one job: providing a room and a professor
/r/PussyPassDenied30/05/18 03:01 AM
0

Where is the coercion then? If you don't want your child to go to sleep hungry, you'll agree to marry me.
/r/MensRights05/05/18 01:00 AM
1

By your logic contracts you voluntarily sign aren't real choices. Contracts you are coerced into voluntarily signing aren't real choices. This concept is so basic, that it's a fundamental part of contract law
/r/MensRights04/05/18 11:32 PM
2

A choice with a gun to your head isn't a free choice.
/r/MensRights04/05/18 12:10 PM
4

Perhaps they shouldn't. But we are where we are. And i don't like the idea of coercing people into marriage. It should be a commitment freely taken.
/r/MensRights04/05/18 01:09 AM
-3

I don't like the idea of forcing people in loveless marriages.
/r/MensRights04/05/18 12:42 AM
1

I would recommend that a person that feels they are wrongfully on a sex offender list, or are no longer at risk of recidivism speak with an attorney, or request a hearing with a judge to see what can be done. I would like to see that burden placed on the state - before putting someone on the list.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/04/18 12:27 AM
1

Your argument started with people being put on the registry for urinating in public, a minor crime, that won't get you on a registry in most states, and even if it does will be listed as the crime you committed to get you on the registry. Then you moved the goal posts to have it be about solicitation of sex acts with stolen credit cards, and a lack of due process. No, no. I was giving reasons why the sex offender registry is repugnant. And there are three prongs. You can't cry that prong 3 is di…
/r/PussyPassDenied22/04/18 11:37 PM
1

You can find more than one example - if you also looked. I just picked one because someone came in here mouthing off demanding proof. I looked at the link of due process: For example, you may be eligible for removal (or from certain requirements) if you: Were convicted of a relatively minor crime, Were a juvenile convicted of an offense related to consensual relations or a less serious crime, Are awarded a reversal on appeal, or Successfully complete a deferred adjudication program. And what if …
/r/PussyPassDenied22/04/18 08:30 PM
1

Everyone's walked back to denying rights from everyone on the sex offender registry because paying for strippers with a stolen credit card; obviously that shouldn't be because having sex with your 17 year old boyfriend when you're 17 shouldn't get you on the registry because peeing in a parking garage shouldn't get you on the registry because taking part in the Univerity of Mighican annual Naked Mile Run shouldn't get you on the registry Everyone has already walked back the registry. we don't ca…
/r/PussyPassDenied22/04/18 08:22 PM
2

After someone has paid their debt to society, they continue to be punished. That is wrong. People are on the list who have no business being on it. That is wrong. People on the list have no due process rights to challenge the government taking away their rights. That is wrong. Presence on the list takes away people's rights, on the assumption that they might commit a crime in the future. You don't take away people's rights because of a crime they haven't committed. That is wrong. A registry isn'…
/r/PussyPassDenied22/04/18 08:09 PM
1

Yes; what part of no list don't you get?
/r/PussyPassDenied22/04/18 08:05 PM
1

Yes they should. And your reaction is to: shut down say "I cannot argue with you anymore" "because clearly you're deranged" Good comeback.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/04/18 08:05 PM
1

Using a stolen credit card to buy strippers will get you on the registry. What due process do people have to challenge their name on the list? What process do they follow to get their name off the list when they are no longer a danger to society.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/04/18 08:04 PM
1

Then you go make the argument. Or, alternatively, I'll just vote for the person who will change the law. Don't be stuck in the confines of the law - fix it.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/04/18 07:58 PM
1

do you therefor believe that child molesters should be allowed to coach soccer teams and work in preschools? Let me give you the answer through you: Do you believe murderers should be allowed to work with people, and thieves should be allowed to have jobs that involves goods or services? But yes. I believe that the 17 year old, who had sex with her 17 year old boyfriend, and then turned 18, should be allowed to be a teacher.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/04/18 03:53 PM
2

You think a drunk guy peeing in a parking garage should be punished for life? You can't honestly be that stupid.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/04/18 03:46 PM
1

Okay so you think the government should only be able to monitor you on the outside if you lie about being raped, but if you are a rapist you've been punished enough? I think the list should not exist at all. But there are some idiots who think it's a good idea. So we need to do an end-run around them.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/04/18 03:45 PM
4

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smith_v._Doe
/r/PussyPassDenied22/04/18 03:44 PM
4

Did the sex offenders show humanity to their unsuspecting victims? Because we really hate it when people go on a naked mile run, pee in a parking garage, or text dick-picks to their girlfriend.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/04/18 03:41 PM
-6

Shaming murderers: immoral shaming thieves: immoral shaming assaulters: immoral shaming rapists: how can we possibly not? How can we not? Because i'm a human with empathy.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/04/18 02:37 PM
-1

Or i'm one of these pesky people who believes in the concept of due-process. We don't brand people with a scarlet letter anymore; because it's a bad thing. And anyone advocating it is an idiot.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/04/18 02:27 PM
-15

You're allowed to have all the lists you want. As long as it does not interfere with their life in any way.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/04/18 02:17 PM
11

And then we should abolish lists of sex offenders; because they've gone through their time.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/04/18 01:40 PM
7

Reality check: she shouldn't get anywhere near that much.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/04/18 01:39 PM
1

Women would prefer you didn't do that; they don't know how to operate a toilet.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/03/18 12:16 AM
18

But now a judge has ruled that the university in Durham, North Carolina, had not acted properly in the case. ...what is a university doing acting at all? Their job is to arrange a professor and a classroom. After that: i'm an adult. If i was assaulted i go to the police.
/r/MensRights22/02/18 12:32 AM
-5

Whether or not her advances were rejected, it's still rape. I'm curious if it was consensual.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/01/18 08:30 PM
-5

I didn't ask what the law decided. Besides, in some places a 15 year old is legally allowed to give consent. So, please answer the question.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/01/18 08:10 PM
-19

The 15-year-old student rejected her advances?
/r/PussyPassDenied13/01/18 06:00 PM
2

Aly Raisman, Olympic gymnast who was molested by Larry Nasser, wanted the University of Michigan to take action against Larry Nasser after accusations came up. ...people want innocent people to punished before they are found guilty. https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/11/10/563260140/aly-raisman-says-she-was-abused-by-usa-gymnastics-doctor
/r/MensRights19/12/17 03:11 AM
1

Tag me in. Dude, tag me in!
/r/PussyPassDenied25/10/17 04:15 AM
1

I appreciate her argument. I simply disagree with her. Nobody enabled Harvey Weinstein. Women who are raped are able to think for themselves. If you don't want to press charges that's your business. And a story should not change your mind about that.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 11:56 AM
13

Was there any evidence that he raped her? You don't find someone guilty without evidence. That's a very difficult standard to have to meet; because in most cases there is no evidence. And in reality, people don't care about evidence: they want a person found guilty, and evidence is not a concern - only what we feel.
/r/MensRights09/10/17 03:32 PM
34

fat women: "plus sized" fat men: "big and tall" Everyone has hangups on language. Special <- Retarded <- Imbecile <- Mongoloid Now that we've gotten the political niceties out of the way.
/r/MensRights08/10/17 01:03 PM
1

And now we're back to the question. The guy who finds out that his daughter that he's helped raise for seven years isn't his daughter. The court will say: DNA or no, you've been the parent for seven years, you owe child support. Fairness dictates that he not have to pay child support. And so we come back to everyone having their taxes raised, and giving that money to the mother. I'm okay with higher taxes. And my tax money going to a single parent. Are you?
/r/MensRights07/10/17 11:46 AM
1

How about the voluntary parents do it What about the involuntary parent (i.e. this post). /r/mensrights
/r/MensRights07/10/17 03:02 AM
0

Who's going to pay for the child? I'm all for raising everyone's taxes to give money to single-parent families. But some people are opposed to higher taxes; or think they should have some say in how the money is spent. We call those idiots: republicans
/r/MensRights06/10/17 10:48 PM
1

How far along in her pregnancy was she before her miscarriage?
/r/PussyPassDenied14/09/17 11:58 PM
0

I agree with you, but most people don't want the correct solution: raise everyone's taxes give the money to the single mother Would you like your taxes raised? Or would you rather it comes from the man who is with her? child support in Texas is 20% of your net resources per month median income in Texas is $55,000 assume 18% if your income goes to taxes that gives you monthly resources of $3,758 20% of that is the amount per-child amount per month: $751 there are 7M children in Texas one-in-four …
/r/MensRights19/08/17 04:56 PM
29

This. He was fired because his valid, well-reasoned, sourced, essay that he only shared privately with select colleagues, got out - and it was embarrassing to the company. the headlines weren't "a guy wrote this" they were "a Google employee wrote this" It's not what he intended. He didn't do anything wrong. And Google would like to do the right thing all the time but they can't. They would be tied up with for months when there are more important things they can be doing.
/r/TheRedPill08/08/17 12:11 PM
1

The problem is that the court cares about what's in the best interest of the child. Of course the correct answer is to raise your taxes, and mine, and hand it to single mothers. But so many conservatives don't want their taxes raised. Or, if they do, they think they should have some say in how the money is spent.
/r/MensRights23/07/17 04:11 AM
2

Do we really think a 122 year old is a threat to society?
/r/PussyPassDenied16/07/17 11:45 PM
-1

It's wrong to punish the child out of your petty desire to spite one of the parents.
/r/MensRights29/06/17 12:18 AM
-1

Nobody belongs in a sex offender registry. It should not exist. It should be uninvented.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/06/17 11:31 AM
1

It's over the top making fun of feminism. So much so that it became banal. They could have drawn it back a bit to make it serious.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/04/17 11:33 PM
2

Who the hell vividly remembers something like that and then proceed to get the most crucial detail - the identity of the guy she accuses of raping her - wrong? Are you actually asking, or are you just being snotty. Because of you're actually interested, you can watch the Frontline episode, which gets into the unreliability of memory and eyewitness testimony. 60 Minutes covered the same story New York Times article from 1997: A Case of Rape, Memory and DNA And the most fascinating example to me w…
/r/PussyPassDenied22/03/17 04:04 AM
2

There's a difference between earnest belief and purposeful fabrication The only difference is what the person thought. Imagine Jennifer was lying about all that. Imagine she had it out for Ronald Cotton, and was purposefully fabricating the events of her rape. Who decides if the person's thoughts are illegal? Why is anyone deciding if her thoughts are illegal? Nobody should be deciding if her thoughts are illegal. and extortion. That's a different issue. Extortion is wrong, and it's an outside a…
/r/PussyPassDenied21/03/17 11:34 AM
5

She accused him of something he didn't do That's exactly what Jennifer did. She accused Ronald Cotton of something he didn't do. She was sure it was him. She swore up and down. The was no doubt in her mind. she (at first) didn't believe the DNA evidence I don't think she should go to prison just because the human brain misremembers. My brain misremembers. I don't think I should go to prison for it.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/03/17 11:22 AM
3

No. I don't like the idea of sending someone to prison based on what they think. Especially, for example, the case of Ronald Cotton. (Search him and PBS). Jennifer was sure Ronald Cotton raped her - after all, she made sure to remember every detail about him while the rape was happening. It was only after years in prison that DNA exonerated him.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/03/17 05:15 AM
5

Feminists took control of the editorial function at Wikipedia several years ago. Feminists publicly support her to this day. Work to keep their public support a secret.
/r/MensRights10/03/17 08:04 PM
3

Is there anything to support the claim "Feminist organizations praise her even today"? The linked Wikipedia article specifically refutes that claim.
/r/MensRights10/03/17 05:19 AM
1

We are, by definition, talking about those women in this argument. Your choices are: go after the father or go after your tax money Which do you prefer. Should a father who wants nothing to do with the child be exempt from having to pay for it? Should Society be instead responsible for paying for it? The quick answer is yes. You and I and a father should be paying higher taxes to give to the mother
/r/PussyPassDenied26/01/17 01:52 PM
2

That's a horrible thing to inflict upon someone who did nothing to deserve it
/r/PussyPassDenied26/01/17 01:50 PM
10

I'll have a shot: The woman needs financial support to raise the child. You have two choices: go after the father raise your taxes Are you willing to pay higher taxes? Or do you suddenly want the court to go after the father who didn't want the kid? The child is innocent. The child did nothing wrong. But it needs food. It needs clothes. It needs water, heat, electricity, car seat, diapers, tens of thousands of dollars a year. The correct answer is to raise everyone's taxes. But i'm curious if yo…
/r/PussyPassDenied26/01/17 02:02 AM
-3

That's like saying it's perfectly possible that you female or male, could have raped her. It's not the same, because she's not claiming I raped her. She is claiming that Brian raped her. Do we ignore her claim? Should Brian be allowed to go free because the 13 year old didn't mention other rapes? The answer is yes. If she didn't want the rapist set free: she should have mentioned unrelated earlier events from her life. Being 13 is no excuse for making poor decisions. She has nobody to blame but …
/r/MensRights18/12/16 02:13 PM
-4

Yeah, even the full quote that kewl gives you doesn't explain it. I'm sure this post makes sense to the cukoo nut-birds in the sub it comes from. But here in /r/all it sounds like a Bernie Sanders supporter complaining about how the DMV is against him.
/r/MensRights09/06/16 04:00 AM
-3

As long we're OK with our taxes being raised to support the child that the perfectly capable father opted out of.
/r/MensRights11/03/16 04:24 AM
21

I was going to say, the first one the guy was not sent to prison for shooting anyone. I didn't bother to read the rest; but i assume they also have reasonable explanations. Not that anyone cares about reasonable explanations and accidents.
/r/MensRights09/01/16 03:49 AM
1

The question in the title presents a false choice.
/r/PussyPass08/02/14 12:04 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter