~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | Intellectual exercises based on the impressions of the Red and Blue pill philosophiesFrom a pure logical standpoint, opposing a belief A doesn't entail agreeing with belief B when there exist other beliefs C, D, E... But I will grant you that certain opposing things like genetic determinism and gender roles that TRP believes in is widely shared among progressives. TBP among themselves have a lot of variation, as do conservatives, libertarians, TRP, and other manospherians. Anyway, I still think your characterization of TBP and TRP is unusual and presupposes many TRP tenets, whic… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/03/14 09:41 PM |
| 11 | Intellectual exercises based on the impressions of the Red and Blue pill philosophiesThis doesn't make sense. Not only is BP not a consistent philosophy, but your framework is so flimsy you could say exactly the opposite: BP teaches you to figure out who you are and be free to become that RP teaches you to change yourself into something you want to be ("I used to be a beta and now I'm an alpha", "How I do cultivate dark triad traits?") | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/03/14 07:58 PM |
| 8 | What is the Blue Pill view regarding the psychological differences between men and women?No, people don't oppose the Red Pill because they believe there are no psychological differences between men and women (maybe some do, I'm not one of them) The problem is the amateur overapplication/misapplication of scientific results to support the philosophy. Sure, on average, there are differences between men and women. But, as other posters stated, within-group variation is significantly greater than the between-group variation. TRP likes to defend its beliefs by saying "we're not talking a… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/03/14 09:34 PM |
| 1 | Two recent studies on hypergamy from Archives of Sexual Behavior, a top journal in sociologyHere is TRP making claims that hypergamy is innate and biological, with the added bonus that they use exactly those words: "It is understood by this sub, atleast from what I understand, that a biological, innate desire to seek better seed and supplies for a females offspring drives a desire to seek those who appear to be of a higher status within the community" "Since learning about female hypergamy, have you started to resent other dudes? I'm not yet comfortable with the whole idea of hypergamy… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/11/13 11:37 PM |
| 4 | Two recent studies on hypergamy from Archives of Sexual Behavior, a top journal in sociologyDude, the post essentially says, "TRP doesn't realize that (their definition of) hypergamy can be explained by constrictive gender roles", under the presumption that it can exist. Are we reading the same post? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/11/13 11:09 PM |
| 5 | Two recent studies on hypergamy from Archives of Sexual Behavior, a top journal in sociologyLook, it's not controversial that heterosexual men tend to evaluate partners based on attractiveness, and heterosexual women tend to evaluate partners based on status. The problem is that TRP takes this to extraordinary lengths, namely that these differences are innate, biological, and unchangeable. hypergamy means that women will always leave their partner when a better one is available. Neither of the above are supported by science in any sense, not even by the papers you've cited. A feminist/… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/11/13 10:59 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter