TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Juan-man Archive

View 0 posts and 35 comments by Juan-man on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

To be fair, that Roosh V guy seems like a pretty scary fringe element. I honestly would have had a very similar reaction to the host's on many of his statements throughout the conference and later chats. The interviews with Yiannopoulous and the 18 year old kid seem to have been heavily edited to only show the points of opposition to feminists. Although it might not be easy for an outsider to access the issues discussed, it doesn't seem as they even tried. Is this a part of a series? Or is this …
/r/MensRights17/12/15 01:30 PM
3

Holy shit! Get those onions away from my face.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 08:35 PM
1

Yep, playing devil's advocate is something that is completely legitimate, especially in a debate society. By the way, it isn't necessarily as easy as simply stating your own views, and there in lies its value as an intellectual exercise. A debate society is not meant to be a public political forum for shaping public thoughts on an issue. It's an exercise, more akin to an actor's rendition of a character in a drama society, meant to showcase the person's skills in research, exposition, counter-ar…
/r/MensRights28/10/15 12:01 PM
5

I agree, the article is pretty balanced and well-written. The final appeal to sympathy with the suffering of these people is a cherry on top of a very solid article, in my opinion. It is apparent that she did some non-superficial research on the subject. The article could've simply resorted to generalizations and still generate a lot of traffic. I'll definitely keep an eye out for her articles.
/r/MensRights14/10/15 06:25 PM
6

You can't feel unsafe when you're dead.
/r/MensRights14/10/15 12:47 PM

The writer of the article is a feminist.
/r/MensRights10/09/15 05:50 PM

Yes, and I do support feminism in my country, to an extent. Women do face legitimate discrimination and some legal and cultural barriers are still in place that prevent them from being free (in a way first world women may be). A prolonged and brutal armed conflict and a deeply religious society does no favors to anyone's right to a free sexuality. Feminism isn't all composed of the superfluous nitpicking that is usually showcased here. The U.S. Has gone a long way in the civil rights track, whil…
/r/MensRights28/08/15 03:39 PM
2

We really don't have much information on the case from the article.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 09:17 PM
-1

Yup same here. No special treatment for anyone. Give access to all children to the opportunity to learn.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 12:11 PM

I'm sorry, I don't understand.
/r/MensRights04/07/15 08:05 PM
2

Great read. The boxing trainer's motivational speech was incredible.
/r/MensRights22/06/15 11:32 AM
-5

Agrede. The law tries to make the best of a bad situation in order to benefit the child. People may argue about the problems with its implementation, but I agree that the principle is ok.
/r/MensRights18/06/15 03:35 PM
-1

I'm not blaming men for anything. I'm defending the woman in the video for what I see as unfair dismissal of what she is saying due to her past crimes and the fact that she is only addressing the issues she experienced in a sex-segregated facility. I have said nothing about blaming anyone for anything, so please don't put words in my mouth.
/r/MensRights17/06/15 07:16 PM

Honestly, I would be VERY pissed if I was forced to remain in a place where there was not enough toilet paper, and had to periodically ask guards to provide it to me piecemeal (don't know if this word is appropriate here). I do not think that her past crime should prevent her from complaining about this. She served her sentence, which is the punishment we as a society agreed to impose on her particular crime. Is she a good person? Definitely not. But her past should not prevent us from listening…
/r/MensRights17/06/15 03:42 PM
2

Great article. It really highlights the symptoms of domestic violence and provides advice and resources for those affected.
/r/MensRights17/06/15 10:57 AM
2

This is horrible. Poor child. I wonder how the judge managed to argue his way past the age of consent laws there. Do we know if there's some type of judicial review of the decision pending?
/r/MensRights22/05/15 10:40 AM
1

This is actually the correct answer. It should be higher up.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 10:33 PM
2

It's very sad. Obviously there is a story behind it that we know nothing about. Why does he just stand there? Why doesn't he leave? What are they saying to him? Victims of bullying need our sympathy, regardless of gender. Oh, and they all seem to be Brazilian, not Mexican, btw.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 10:15 AM
1

Interesting article, but I see no harm in it really.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 05:25 PM
-1

The report posted suggests it was an issue of laziness and not deliberate intent behind her mistake. It IS a serious mistake, but calling for her career to be over is still very very harsh. What would you do if you suddenly lost your livelihood? The work that feeds you and your family? If a single mistake meant that, on top of answering for the pending lawsuits where you are to be held personally liable for your mistake, nobody would hire you again? Do you think that it is fair that, after indem…
/r/MensRights06/04/15 01:42 PM
-1

People on this thread are calling for the reporter's career to be over. Come on, people, it's a human being we're talking about here. It is not necessary for her career to be over. I don't wish that on anyone, especially if acting on (although misguided) good faith. Everyone makes mistakes. She should most definitely face the consequences of her mistake (which was shown in the report not to be entirely hers within the organization, and somewhat the result of her main source's manipulation). But …
/r/MensRights06/04/15 11:49 AM
1

He argues, among many other things, that there is a sense of sexual entitlement in current masculinity, and that the in group dynamics between males (hazing, homogenizing behaviors) are a challenge to gender equality, as they negatively shape male and female experience on campus. Among the things that stuck with me (don't expect a very accurate tl;dr of an hour and a half): Social dynamics are changing. People are growing up slower than in the 1800s: people living with their parents longer, assu…
/r/MensRights02/03/15 08:48 PM
1

I agree. I think this is a question of form prevailing over substance. There are people on both sides that are crazy and have fringe opinions on very controversial issues who, vying for attention, use inflammatory speech to get their point across. I, personally, agree with many of Feminisim's points about sexism in our everyday lives, but the way some feminists try to get their point across by pandering to their base really irks me. I consider myself a progressive person. I am a lawyer who acted…
/r/MensRights15/12/14 12:19 PM
1

This is actually the only piece of reporting on the "study" that states the non-seriousness of the results. I actually think it is fair reporting on this "news".
/r/MensRights15/12/14 10:42 AM
1

I agree. The only thing I can conclude from this article is the fact that people can be assholes, regardless of their gender. But I guess we already know that, don't we? I really don't like the title to this thread, as we'll assume of the comments. Don't perpetuate gender stereotypes please.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 11:33 AM
0

Meh, I stopped watching when he said that women's problems are not important because they are "made up". I don't think stating any gender's problems as non-existent is a fair assessment.
/r/MensRights03/05/14 07:32 PM
0

Please don't encourage people to take screenshots from other people's websites. Copyright is an issue here.
/r/MensRights29/04/14 12:48 PM
1

I agree. Sometimes the law intrudes excessively and peoples' (and businesses') plans. I see no foul in that hotel's business model. This really doesn't hurt anybody in practice.
/r/MensRights29/04/14 12:24 PM
1

"At the moment, German is a very comfortable language, but a very unfair one." THIS, however, is clearly false, as anyone trying to learn German can attest.
/r/MensRights25/03/14 11:22 PM
2

I may not be the most informed person to answer that question. So I'll pass. I'm sure there must be people deeply knowledgeable of the subject (including both the academic foundations of the subject and it's real world basis justification) and good critical thinking skills. The feminist proponent seems to have a clear mastery over the subject. An uninformed opponent would be hard pressed to argue against her. I'm sure someone in this subreddit can come up with a name. Sadly, that person is not m…
/r/MensRights25/03/14 11:08 PM
2

I listened to the letters being read, and it seemed like the natural response. Bear in mind that this was a one-sided debate where no compelling case was made against the concept of rape culture being debated. This debate would not change the opinion of people who believe that rape culture as a concept is useful and applicable. On the contrary, it would validate their opinions. The opposite is also true.
/r/MensRights25/03/14 10:27 PM
6

Honestly, the debate was awful. Ms. MacDonald's arguments were lacking at best, and she constantly changed or avoided the subject. She also seemed to have no answer when her counterpart went into the specifics of the survey questions. Overall, it seemed like she simply went into the debate with some very narrow bullet points, and simply refused to debate outside of them. People are rightfully angry with the show. MacDonald, as a guest in the debate, did not contribute anything meaningful at all.
/r/MensRights25/03/14 07:20 PM
1

I wholeheartedly agree with you. We do not have all the evidence on the case.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 12:15 AM
1

I agree with her, the trial by jury has flaws as a means to judge a famous person's conduct. However, I think a non-jury trial is also heavily influenced by the judge's personal opinions (although, as a trained professional it may be less so). I also agree with her on the issue that the verdict reached in a court of law is based only on the information presented at the trial (by definition far from perfect). Testimony is unreliable in most occasions and hard evidence is hard to come by. However,…
/r/MensRights07/02/14 10:35 PM
2

I try never to judge a criminal sentencing based on a news article. It is quite likely that the difference in their sentences is based on evidence presented at the trial that the journalists will likely not present in their article due to lazyness or time/space constraints. This is no men's rights issue, at least not with the limited information provided by the article.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 04:22 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter