| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | He ain't wrongRead the article that's been linked already. The figures linked aren't for this world cup. They're figures from 2016. They include a women's world cup (which they won) but not the men's. If you extend the dates to also include the mens world cup the mens team generated 10 million more. Here's a more in depth article. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/07/08/are-us-womens-soccer-players-really-earning-less-than-men/ | /r/PussyPassDenied | 08/07/19 01:10 PM |
| 13 | He ain't wrongExcept that it doesn't. The figures that are being thrown around claiming the women make bring in more revenue are really misleading. They only include a womens world cup cycle years They only account for matchday revenue, which is 1/4 of the FA's total revenue They are figures from the previous pay structure https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/07/08/are-us-womens-soccer-players-really-earning-less-than-men/ | /r/PussyPassDenied | 08/07/19 12:46 PM |
| 19 | He ain't wrongThose figures are for matchday earnings that only account for 1/4 of the FA's revenue. Also, those figures include a women's world cup cycle and not the men's. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 08/07/19 12:34 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter