TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Juice_Concentrate Archive

View 0 posts and 29 comments by Juice_Concentrate on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

It's almost as if the Bible was on to something when it suggested that perhaps a man and a woman should commit to each other once and for life(viewing sexual intercourse as a type of physical marriage that implies commitment even when there is none). But, it's not new information that many people(both male and female) view marriage as an antiquated and pointless engagement. I hope people who decide to live together as "room mates with benefits" keep an eye on their local common law marriage stat…
/r/MensRights21/03/22 06:55 PM
1

I used neither word, because neither is relevant to population level observations about the way people tend to behave(according to their gender). This thing where people identify as something other than their biological sex is all fine from a social standpoint, but I hope you're not suggesting it would make any kind of sense for a biological female to attempt to become pregnant either during or after medically transitioning(either surgical or chemical). The alternative seems to be suggesting I c…
/r/MensRights20/03/22 09:10 PM
11

Men and women are fundamentally different in many ways. Anyone who thinks otherwise need look no further than reproduction, but that's just the most obvious difference. But, for the most part, men are manly, and women are womanly, but to suggest each gender should behave this way is a bit silly. For the most part, people have free will, and will do what they want. But the exceptions are few, statistically speaking, and the people who would seek for society as a whole to buck the natural order of…
/r/MensRights20/03/22 10:20 AM
22

Automatic banning is dumb as a whole. The entire reason I prefer reddit is that subs are mostly public unless and until Reddit decides that they are too dangerous to be left public and quarantines them, which is usually a sign that if they don't change, they're going to be shut down. The real problem I see here is that r/MensRights isn't an incel subreddit, and that there is significant activity here by incels regardless, probably because all their other subs got shutdown. As a community, we all…
/r/MensRights17/03/22 04:08 PM
2

So what she's saying is, today is the day that she finally unleashed her inner Karen.
/r/MensRights04/03/22 06:53 PM
2

First world society isn't because violence and aggression are no longer the best way to solve problems. The majority of the world's population does not live in first world conditions. If you do, be thankful for that. And then you can get started working on men's rights.
/r/MensRights22/02/22 01:38 AM
2

Sweeping generalizations will do little to nothing to further your argument.
/r/MensRights21/02/22 11:00 PM
2

How about: It's possible to treat everyone fairly, without marginalizing anyone. Human society as a whole is dominated by males. It's only in the first world(which was created by men fighting wars) that men "have the problems they do". First world societies have some problems that are inflicted on males, caused by incorrect assumptions, stereotypes, and in many cases, baseless contempt against men. This is what we fighting against, and has no direct cause attributable only to women. Directing th…
/r/MensRights21/02/22 10:42 PM
6

This is not the goal of the men's rights movement. Women are not your enemy.
/r/MensRights21/02/22 09:42 PM
4

I'm fine with funding the welfare state, to some degree. There are plenty of people who legitimately benefit from it and return to being productive members of society. I know because my mom was on welfare at one point when I was growing up. It isn't as if your taxes are really negotiable anyway, and if you look at domestic spending, welfare is a drop in the bucket, overall. Men transferring wealth to women willingly is actually a really good argument against income equality, if anything. Not sur…
/r/MensRights16/02/22 04:13 AM
1

Saying either one is an ignorant, bigoted generalization. More likely the intent is something along the lines of, "I hate it when [gender] does X". This is a far more pointed and reasonable way to state such an opinion. Saying you hate men or you hate women is rather pointless by comparison; it conveys nothing, solves no problem, and only serves to reveal you for exactly what you are: a fool. In conclusion, there is no way to argue against either statement, and that's by design. Nor should you t…
/r/MensRights15/02/22 03:06 AM
20

Vasectomy is not a form of birth control. Vasectomy reversals are not 100% effective(not even close). That said, if you're going to freeze your sperm anyway, be careful with who you choose to provide the service, and read the storage contract carefully; some storage facilities for both sperm and eggs have mishandled them in the past, allowing other clients to receive them even though they were never intended to be sold/given.
/r/MensRights23/01/22 01:22 AM
0

I'm not sure what you expected. You're on Reddit making false statements as if you don't understand the word jurisdiction. I don't see the point in insulting me.
/r/MensRights23/12/21 02:04 AM
0

There are lots of differences; I'll point out the two most extreme here. You own an animal, and though the state also has jurisdiction over animals, you can do lots of things with an animal that aren't against the law in some places that it's absolutely unacceptable to do with a minor in any jurisdiction in the U.S. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enumclaw_horse_sex_case The law in Washington was changed specifically as a result of this case, but at the time, they had no way to charge the individu…
/r/MensRights22/12/21 06:42 PM
1

You're conflating jurisdiction with ownership. Just because the local PD has jurisdiction over your home doesn't mean they own it. Besides, people can no longer be owned in the U.S. The closest thing we have to ownership that applies to children is called stewardship. This has more to do with responsibility than it does privilege.
/r/MensRights22/12/21 05:04 PM
3

You're not wrong, I'm just encouraging far more water intake than usual, at least up to that overflow event. If you stop after that you're unlikely to sustain injury. Though, I probably should've made my exaggeration clear.
/r/MensRights10/12/21 06:53 AM
8

Piss boy lasts through high school, but the knowledge that one was a coward instead of standing up for themselves lasts a life time.
/r/MensRights09/12/21 09:54 PM
272

I've read down through the comments to summarize the best options I see for OP. 1) Go to the bathroom anyway if you need to, because this is a human rights violation. They can't physical stop you from doing so, but they will likely try to take punitive action against you. When they do, you've got a lawsuit. 2) Open a lawsuit anyway, but comply with the rules until the court orders an injunction. 3) Malicious compliance. Bring a change of clothes to school. Ask to use the restroom during class, a…
/r/MensRights09/12/21 08:20 PM
1

It may be time for a little malicious compliance. If you're not permitted to go *to* the restroom to relieve yourselves, then relieve yourselves in the classroom. As an added bonus, you'll likely have to go home to clean yourself up. Just make sure your parents are aware of what you plan to do so they're not caught off guard. You could even try to make their(your parents) lives easier by volunteering to take a cab home that day, assuming they can't make it work to pick you up.
/r/MensRights09/12/21 07:07 PM
2

Let's be clear here. Birth parent means one of the two people who contributed biologically to the child's existence. You *are* his birth parent. One of two. Of the only birth parents he will ever have.
/r/MensRights02/12/21 01:45 AM
7

I think that's the point. Kind of like how some teachers have been accused(anecdotally) of violations of the Geneva conventions' ban on group punishment, despite students not being prisoners of war. While it certainly isn't a war crime, it's also definitely not cool.
/r/MensRights15/11/21 11:54 PM
2

The foreskin is fused onto the glans until puberty. I assisted in both of my sons' circumcisions, and unless I was patently misunderstanding the situation, nothing was fused anywhere... Possible this happens later in childhood, perhaps a few weeks/months after birth?
/r/MensRights02/10/21 06:06 AM
-9

I feel like perhaps you've never seen a circumcision. The penis is most certainly outside the body, and clipping a bit of skin from around the glans does not require insertion of anything inside the body.
/r/MensRights17/09/21 08:01 PM
18

Most jurisdictions(in the U.S. anyway) don't allow this unless and until another man is willing to "take" those responsibilities and rights via formal adoption of the child in question.
/r/MensRights17/09/21 07:55 PM
-4

Equal rights doesn't mean equal capabilities though. Specifically, men can't carry children, so unless and until synthetic wombs are reliable enough(and sufficiently accepted by society despite cultural taboos), we simply will not achieve 100% equity. There are many other ways men and women are different, that's just the most glaringly obvious difference. It also makes the most difference, because at this point in time many of the other differences precipitate from that.
/r/MensRights15/07/21 02:18 AM
-5

Yeah, sure, if it comes down to that. You make it sound far more favorable by saying women would be "conscripted", though. Far more likely they would be kept as slaves, or at best indentured servants. The vast majority of them, anyway. But remember, if things get bad enough, most men would also end up no better off than than indentured servants. No, I'm no fan of the idea that humanity should be striving for equity. Equal opportunity is enough, and tends to favor women in most cases.
/r/MensRights14/07/21 11:15 PM
-10

I don't really see a big problem there. On a societal level, women already tend to take more time off work to care for their offspring than men. Why would it be fair to expect them to also contribute to the defense of the nation en masse?
/r/MensRights14/07/21 10:19 PM
-7

Yeah. It's important to remember I'm not saying women can't or shouldn't serve. By all means they should, if they want to. Fact of the matter is, many women have absolutely zero interest in military service. Those that do should absolutely be allowed, nay, encouraged, to enlist. But men can't bear children. At least until synthetic womb technology is up to the task, the species simply cannot reproduce without women. Men, on the other hand, can largely be replaced with freezers, at least for a fe…
/r/MensRights14/07/21 09:55 PM
-23

This is silly. While it's absolutely fine that women enlist, drafting them is idiotic. The point of a draft would go hand in hand with a contingency end-of-the-world threat. You're going to want a healthy population of women "at home" to be able to recover population as quickly as possible. If equality is this important it would make far more sense to abolish the draft entirely with the assumption that our global society has reached a point where it's simply no longer necessary.
/r/MensRights14/07/21 09:12 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter