TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

JuicyHotkiss Archive

View 0 posts and 19 comments by JuicyHotkiss on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

It’s a choice? Wasn’t this the same argument that was made by homosexuals “it’s not a choice”. To be clear: I do believe it is not a choice and I’m happy with what anyone accepts for themselves.
/r/AntiFeminists18/06/20 02:58 AM
5

Perhaps someone trying to poke fun of what’s dirty and unhygienic shouldn’t have nails like that. Those things are absolutely grotesque.
/r/MensRights13/04/20 03:32 AM
121

The escalator should have also been built so as to more likely maim or kill you, to represent the higher risk of life some higher-paying jobs include
/r/MensRights25/08/19 01:58 PM
10

And now you know to never date your sister.
/r/AntiFeminists25/08/19 01:10 AM
6

Talk about missing the point. They weren’t saying that we should have 60% less doctors. They were saying that we should INSTEAD invest those limited resources into people who are driven by a genuine passion to the field.
/r/MensRights15/08/19 04:26 PM
2

Unless you’re a cis white male.
/r/MensRights11/08/19 05:51 AM
19

People go to jail longer for holding less kilos of weed. Super ridiculous.
/r/PussyPass09/08/19 04:13 AM
3

I appreciate the clarification. Yes, I would be much more on board with those qualifications, especially social work or time and effort out back into our society. Your clarifications make a lot more sense.
/r/MensRights30/07/19 02:55 AM
3

I can see your points on earning the right, citizenship and other contributing factors to the society. My concern is your second point. What if the person(s) objected to military service, or better yet, the potential of having to take a life? What would qualify as net taxpayer status, and how would we ensure it doesn’t create a greater divide between the wealthy and the poor? I may be not entirely seeing the vision you are stating, but I read it as x taxes and above get a voice, anything lower t…
/r/MensRights30/07/19 02:52 AM
2

Much appreciated. I’ll save the post for reference later.
/r/MensRights30/07/19 02:25 AM
2

Thank you for the reply and yes, I would absolutely like the name of the book...video series may be better, especially if the book is a little dry. I’m not going to pretend I have the best attention span, but I do have the curiosity to find out more.
/r/MensRights30/07/19 02:19 AM
3

I’m sincerely interested in hearing how our government has changed in the last 125 years, specifically...what was the biggest eye-opener for you, as you went through the classes?
/r/MensRights30/07/19 02:07 AM
2

Well-stated on all accounts. I appreciate you inputs and insight. The parts that struck the deepest chord with me was the accountability piece and the importance of society to adjust. 👍
/r/MensRights23/07/19 12:19 AM
1

I don’t know if there is a difference, but I am open to learning. Humanist: Humanists believe that human experience and rational thinking provide the only source of both knowledge and a moral code to live by. Egalitarianism: philosophy that prioritizes equality for all people. Egalitarian doctrines are generally characterized by the idea that all human persons are equal in fundamental worth or moral status. Are these wholly one in the same, or do they have philosophical points of divergence? To …
/r/MensRights22/07/19 02:41 AM
1

Why not a movement for humanist? Help my ignorance out, but isn’t it best for our species and societies to value equality opportunities to all? Emphasis on opportunities, not outcome. Thank you in advance for a civil discussion.
/r/MensRights22/07/19 01:18 AM
1

That’s exactly how I always read these mindsets. I also think of Jordan Peterson and his very true comment that a strong and healthy-minded man is better not only for men, but also for women.
/r/AntiFeminists17/07/19 06:29 PM
2

This type of mindset always makes me think, “if we replaced ______ (men) with group ______ (let’s say black people), this perspective would immediately be labeled as racist/hate speech/etc” It boggles my mind how any rational-minded person would think this perspective is appropriate, healthy, or for the betterment of our society.
/r/AntiFeminists17/07/19 06:22 PM
1

I don’t agree with all of the points being valid, but the only way we all make for a better society is to being open to discussions, even with (especially with) those who have differing voices than our own. Let’s treat others with the same respect that we would expect to receive ourselves.
/r/AntiFeminists17/07/19 06:19 PM
3

I highly encourage you to watch some videos, such as Jordan Peterson on Joe Rogan’s podcasts. They are about 2-3 hours and very interesting. You may agree with all, some, none, but it is a good exercise for us all to listen and constantly question and grow ourselves.
/r/AntiFeminists17/07/19 04:06 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter