TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Juko007 Archive

View 0 posts and 127 comments by Juko007 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Intimate partner violence would SKYROCKET because women are being used to it being okay if they get physical with men because they are weaker. They also lack the sociolization that boys/men go through when it comes to controlling their physicality.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/22 05:52 PM
–

You know that people can still coparent even if they are separated? Nothig stops fathers from providing male guidance for their kids except for most fathers of single mother kids are not interested in their kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/22 12:44 PM
–

Fair enouh, how?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/22 12:43 PM
–

So instead of making sure the child has its basic needs met by making the father pay his fair share, you'd rather forcibly remove the child from the only parent they have left and put it in foster care? That's not only insanely idiotic from a human rights perspective but also economically inefficient.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/22 09:55 AM
–

So you are in favor of increasing child support? Great idea!
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/22 09:46 AM
2

Actually, what you are describing is the blip in our evolutionary history when people decided that monogamy was the way to go. With monogamy, you guaranteed that every dude will have exactly one woman, so societal value was suddenly balanced and skills and labor became more valuable than reproductive capabilities. For millions of years before that, men would kill each other for a chance to have offspring.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 11:38 AM
1

Super sad to imagine how much loneliness, anger, abysimal self esteem and frustration it takes to arrive at such a world view.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 03:39 PM
4

Personal experience from me and my circle of friends. I'm the tallest guy among my friends but back in the day when we still went out clubbing, being tall didn't do anything for me. Online dating wasn't too crazy either. while many of my shorter, attractive friends managed to have a quite constant stream of ONS, I could maybe get 1-2 matches per month but always with serious intentions. Being tall is definitely better than being short but I think attractive + short still works better than tall +…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 03:32 PM
5

As 6'3 dude with a babyface, my personal experience is that a good looking face is far more important than height.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 02:02 PM
2

It's being "lied to" by society about what women are attracted to that confuses many young men. Movies, books and culture in general tell men that what women are attracted to is being empathic, understanding, a good listener, a feminist, having family values etc. What they completely slide under the rug is the fact that that's only true for guys who meet a baseline of physical attractiveness in the first place. Physical attractiveness is the absolute minimum requirement for all of these aspects …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/21 02:20 AM
-3

Absolutely not. Extreme promiscuity is a red flag but extreme celebacy is an even bigger one.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/21 09:45 AM
10

Who's gonna tell him guys?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/21 09:43 AM
2

Why the fuck is anyone still using MBTI? I mean, I get it, personality is interesting but why not use a model that actually works?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/21 09:35 PM
16

Of course you can't, but in the same way that we can say that men are on average taller than women, we can say that women like competent men with resources and men like young, fertile women. Of course there's a lot of nuance lost but that's kind of the big theme that it boils down to on average.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/21 03:05 PM
28

Women seek out competence and resources, men seek out youth and fertility.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/21 03:03 PM
3

That's because you feel miserable about yourself and think cheap sex with traumatized women will fix that. Spoiler: It won't
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/21 10:05 PM
0

Okay, so here's how to fix your broken systen: Tax the rich, defund the military, regulate the financial markets, lower college tuition, make health insurance mandatory, extend welfare to everyone in need, invest in public infrastructure, abolish for profit prisons, stop meddling in foreign affairs and finally adopt the metric system.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/21 09:55 PM
3

Some food for thought: the Dutch once had a database that logged every citizens religion so the cities could deal better with religious holidays, knew which businesses would shut down when, where to build new churches, synagogues etc. Really handy system...until the Nazis invaded and used it to relentlessly hunt down all the jews. The lesson is: Don't build systems that have tremendous potential for abuse when the political power shifts
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/21 05:40 PM
1

Here's a picture of what male and female bodies look like at different body fat percentages: https://www.estimatebodyfat.com/static/images/bodyfatpercentagepictures.png I think it's safe to say that for men, an ideal body fat percentage to be considered attractive is between 10 - 15% while women can still look great at 25 - 35% body fat. Of course, men naturally have less body fat than women, gain muscle quicker and loose fat quicker but an unhealthy lifestyle will make a man look unattractive a…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/21 10:13 AM
5

And why is that a bad thing? Infatuation fades over time, thats just a fact of life, that's our biological setup. No couple is crazy in love after 30 years the same way they have been in the first 3 months. But trust, respect and a sense of "we" instead of "me" all grow over time and form a strong bond that gives people security, meaning, and a place to belong. The secret to a happy long-term relationship is not being crazy in love all the time, it's in finding a partner that you can respect, ap…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/21 08:16 AM
3

Like what
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/21 08:10 PM
1

Most mental health issues do have a hereditary component (schizophrenia, anxiety disorders, depression, addictive tendencies). If and how these components are expressed in an individual largely depends on circumstancial factors, with some factors buffering against them (social interconnection, a secure environment, little stress, good diet, routines) while others benefit them (stress, social isolation, too little sleep, no exercise etc.). Feeling accepted and well incorporated in your social env…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/21 06:29 PM
13

Ah yes, the good ol' "Your problems are your fault, stop being a bitch and man up".
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/21 01:51 PM
6

The advice is not to help men get laid but to protect women from unwanted advances from these undesirable men.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/21 07:40 PM
7

You are objectively wrong: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belongingness https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hospitalism
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 04:55 PM
1

Would be included in my definitiin of asshole but fair enough
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/20 09:39 AM
1

And that makes him less of an asshole?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/20 09:23 AM
7

Your subjective anecdotal evidence is irrelevant. Have you ever competed with your boss for a woman you both desire? I suspect not. There are literally 100s of studies showing that successful leaders have higher dark triad personality traits (which also includes manipulating others into liking them Btw.) Just search for dark triad and leadership on Google Scholar.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/20 04:59 PM
28

CEOs and politicians have high values of dark triad personality traits. Just because they are polite doesn't mean they are not assholes.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/20 02:20 PM
38

From a psychological perspective I think there are several processes at work: 1) Yes, women like confident, extraverted, high-status men who are assertive towards other men, physically superior to them and are well respected by others. 2) These type of men tend to be douchy towards other men because they are in direct competition. This does not mean however, that these men are assholes towards women too. There is no competition and no need for confrontation with women. This is why the same guy c…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/20 01:39 PM
2

If this opinion is based on your personal experiences I sincerely pity you...
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/20 04:44 PM
20

You have to take into account though that the bar is considerably higher to be considered "moderately attractive". The majority of men are invisible to the majority of women because you have to stand out to considered attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/20 05:08 PM
17

Just wanted to say that being a guy is not a guarantee for being confident, brave or laid back. I know a lot of men with anxiety disorders and panic attacks...
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/20 05:06 PM
4

Women outearn men between 20 and 35 so how exactly do you think this works?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/20 02:11 PM
8

Sure you can overcome some of your instincts but you can't chose who you're attracted to
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/20 10:46 AM
3

You put out a claim and put this behind it, if you don't think this is evidence supporting your claim, why did you put it there? And if that's not supposed to be evidence, do you have any?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/20 12:43 PM
4

Ah yes, and a YouTube video of some schmoe is your "evidence", why am I not surprised?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/20 12:36 PM
-1

Lol, no thanks, I don't live in a third world country. The odds of somebody attacking me on the streets are practically negligible where I live. I'd rather take that risk then spent the rest of my life being paranoid
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/20 06:18 AM
1

Yeah, and when it comes to people, that means treating every stranger as a murderer/rapist
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/20 05:57 AM
1

So everybody should be afraid all the time? Doesn't sound like a society I'd want to live in
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/20 03:48 AM
2

Does makeup count?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/20 09:49 PM
1

> Inherent worth can only be true if all people think that Nope! Men are taller than women. Just because some women are taller then some men does not disprove the general rule.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/20 10:43 AM
3

It doesn't disprove anything because nobody cares about one stray individual opinion. It'tsthe bigger picture that counts.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/20 09:52 AM
1

Sure!
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/20 03:48 PM
1

Good luck with that! Judging by your post history, you'll need it.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/20 11:22 AM
1

Those are not mutually exclusive so maybe you're just shit at expressing yourself... ¯_(ツ)_/¯. Your comment sure sounds like you'd prefer some 18yo who is willing to marry you on the spot over a college educated women
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/20 06:35 AM
1

Sounds like you want a dependent wife without potential that just chains herself to the first guy she meets out of fear that there might not be sth better for her out there. Have fun with that mentally unstable time bomb.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/20 07:22 PM
3

I'm curious about this, do you have a link to the study?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/20 06:34 PM
1

Well, OP was talking about "major life difficulties" so I didn't think that problems at work or other mundane stuff would really apply here
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/20 01:18 PM
3

Because there are some problems that you cannot effectively deal with on your own. Personality Disorders, Dissociative Disorders, Anxiety Disorders, Mood Disorders, Grief, Substance Abuse Disorders (which ironically often result from trying to deal with issues without support)...There are literally hundreds of papers showing that social capital and support are one of the biggest if not the biggest factors for overcoming difficult times in life. Taking this away from yourself just to conform to t…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/20 12:29 PM
0

Wow, judging by these answers most of you guys have never had real problems or have never been loved. I feel truly sorry for some of you...
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/20 11:40 AM
10

Most likely only because more intelligent people know better how to present themselves as attractive as possible
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/20 12:38 PM
3

No, they give us interesting hypotheses that we can test in controlled experiments that allow for causal inference.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/20 11:24 AM
2

Very important from a statistical standpoint: While 91% sounds like a huge risk factor, it's important to know that's a relative risk, not an absolute one. If your risk of getting cancer is 1% and that of another group is 2%, they have twice the relative risk (100% increase) but it doesn't make too much of a difference in practice, it's just a 1% difference in absolute risk. Also: There is a ton of third factor variables here that are very likely better predictors of cancer risk than the number …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/20 11:22 AM
1

We can't know if there is an objective Reality because the only way we can perceive it is through the filter of our experiences, biases and how our brains are wired and our sensory organs work. What you perceive as the color green might look very different from what I perceive as green but we would never know because we use the same name for color of a certain wavelength of light. So even if there is such a thing as an objective reality (and that is debated for decades in philosophy by this poin…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 07:46 AM
12

If you are interested in an academic perspective, there is a lot of research about this topic in social psychology, it's called sociometer theory. The basic idea is that our self-esteem is a gauge for how well we are connected to others or how likeable/desirable we are to others. Evolutionary speaking, this was an advantageous system to have because it steers us towards behaviors that make others like us and thus ensures that we can become/stay part of a group and have higher reproductive fitnes…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/20 12:13 PM
1

I have dated options 1 and 2 and decided for me that 3 is the best for me
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/20 12:45 AM
9

I think the reason why this wouldn't work is because when men complain about not having sex, it's mostly not about the physical act itself. If it was, Masturbation and prostitution could solve this problem. It's more about the feeling of being desirable/valued/respected as a man. And for most men, the gauge for this is how many/what kind of women are interested in having sex with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/19 10:45 AM
12

Without data, you are just another person with an opinion and Ops opinion is just as good/bad as anyones. If we want to have a constructive discussion, we need some facts that we can agree on first.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/19 01:52 PM
-1

Agreed! This wasn't meant to be a recommendation, just a post-hoc explanation
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/19 09:26 PM
5

I don't think it's that simple either. A sense of self-worth and competence can have multiple sources like academic, athletic or career achievements, having close friends and family, a sense of meaning in one's life or sexual success. Depending on personality, culture and context, these things are valued to different degrees by people themselves and their social networks. In essence though, we gain confidence through the things that we think/know important others would value in us. So yes, confi…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/19 09:02 PM
18

1000 times this! Most men don't crave the sex per se. If they did, they could just masturbate. What they actually crave is to feel good enough for a women to want to have sex with them. That's the most basic struggle men face, to constantly prove that they are "good enough".
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/19 06:27 PM
1

This is only correct if she is sampling men to sleep with at random. Which nobody does. Sample size cannot safeguard you from unrepresentative sampling mechanisms. You could literally sample half the population of the planet and still get grossly inaccurate estimate of a given feature with a flawed sampling mechanism, while you could get a pretty good one with just a couple of hundred people if you select them randomly.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/19 09:20 AM
1

Sample size has very little to do with the representativeness of your sample. You could've banged 5000 dudes and your experience could still be an extremely bad estimator of mens behavior in general, because you don't select guys to sleep with at random. Your experiences do not describe men in general but the very specific subset of the male population that is physically/mentally attractive to you, lives in your area, with a similar socioeconomic background, grew up roughly in the same generatio…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/19 09:13 AM
26

I would say as an ugly girl, you'll have about the same life as an average guy. You have to invest heavily in relationships and probably will have to make a lot of compromises. People don't really care how you are doing as long as you're functioning properly for society. You won't get any special treatment, opportunities, favors or kindness just because you're attractive. You will have to work hard and constantly prove yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/19 07:01 AM
1

Not ugly but not my type physically or in terms of her character l
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/19 09:03 PM
6

Surprisingly yes! When I was at university a friend of mine (let's call her C.) invited the whole group for predrinks at her place so we all went and later went out to the city. A couple of hours fast forward and everyone wants go home but C insists that I take her home because it's safer. This was a really small Dutch city where nothing ever happened, she wasn't that drunk, it was only a couple of blocks away but the complete opposite direction and my way home already was going to take 1h+. But…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/19 07:34 AM
1

If you don't know what I meant, you can replace the word kindness by altruism in my previous comment
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/19 02:31 PM
1

There are enough papers on game theory and shared goods network simulations to show that larger collectives need altruism to prosper. Reciprocity and tit for tat are not sufficient to lead to systems as complex as we are living in right now because they are easily broken by a few deviant/cheating actors. And kinship preference does not invalidate the existence of altruism at all because those concepts are not mutually exclusive. If you never experienced kindness from someone without ulterior mot…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/19 02:28 PM
1

Because altruism is the only way to ensure prosperity in a society. If it was everyone for themselves we'd still live in caves and throw rocks at each other. One of your ancestors depended on altruism to survive and some of your offspring will depend on it again. And judging by your comments, you do too. Without altruism, everyone is off worse. Besides the fact that psychologically healthy people generally agree that killing children is a bad thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/19 06:58 AM
1

I am not preventing it because I can't, but that is different from actively supporting it?!
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/19 02:03 PM
1

Of course they do. They can only be super-rich because a lot of other people are super-poor. And while super-poor people directly lead to an increased crime rate and political instability, we as a society gain nothing from a few super-rich individuals. You are just as innovative and industrious with 10 billion in the bank as you are with 100 billion in the bank, so why not use that money to prevent the negative consequences of poverty? I can give you two examples from Germany where exactly the o…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/19 02:02 PM
1

I think we just disagree about the amount of "fair tax rate". I strongly believe that the tax rate must increase with income to prevent a constantly increasing devide between a few super-rich individuals and the vast majority of the population, which always leads to political instability. That's why I gladly pay 46% taxes on my income while some friends of mine pay 2% on their 450€/month jobs. If you pay 20% on 1 billion you won't be affected at all, if you pay 20% on 450€, it's not worth gettin…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/19 01:22 PM
1

When you have an income of say 10 billion in a given year, it practically does not matter whether you pay 30% or 70% of taxes. You will be able to buy everything you could ever want regardless. So the incentive hasn't really changed. Innovation always requires creativity and pressure to meet your basic human needs is the best way of killing creativity. Think of it this way. But we're already far off topic so I'd say let's just agree to disagree
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/19 01:08 PM
1

Sure, there has to be some kind of incentive to put in extra effort but no great invention or service was ever created through the sole motivation of "I wanna be filthy rich some day". Amazon, Facebook, Google or Roomba would've been created regardless of whether their owners would have to spent 30% on taxes or 70% of taxes in the future. Even with 70%, they would be billionaires with more money than they could ever spent in a lifetime. See for example the initiative founded by Bill Gates to inc…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/19 11:03 AM
1

All the more reason to provide equal opportunity to everybody. What's the benefit of having a class of very few super-rich individuals?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/19 10:50 AM
2

So you gre up isolated in the woods and typed this comment on a rock with wifi?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/19 10:41 AM
1

A) 30% effective tax rate is NOTHING. I pay 46% (Germany) on my salary alone and I still have more than enough to live comfortably. I have 0€ of student loans because education is free, I never had to pay a medical bill because we have health insurance and should I ever become jobless, I will have a home, food and a basic income provided for me indefinitly B) All of the above C) You were only able to amass wealth because of the society you live in. If you grew up isolated in a jungle you'd eithe…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/19 10:23 AM
1

Well, killing all of humanity would also technically "solve" the problem. But I think its a reasonable assumption that we are searching for the best viable solution here that doesn't involve genocide.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/19 10:12 AM
0

Because we can achieve a lot more good things for everyone if we work together and support each other than anyone could achieve on their own. I'm sure that some of your ancestors at some point were dependent on altruism and some of your offspring will at some point again. Who knows, you might be too. In the grand scheme of things, solidarity benefits everybody sooner or later. Having to pay a bit of taxes is a really small price to pay for having an emergency net to catch people who would otherw…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/19 10:03 AM
1

Sorry for assuming your suggestion was supposed to be a good course of action
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/19 09:56 AM
1

You should find this interesting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_nature
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/19 09:54 AM
2

You want to let children die of starvation because of their parents bad decisions?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/19 09:40 AM
1

You really want capitalism to regulate basic transport infrastructure, access to food and water, law enforcement, education and basic medical care?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/19 09:37 AM
0

Yeah right, let's throw thousands of kids into poverty and misery so that MAureliusTRP can pay 10$ less taxes, that sounds like a good tradeoff!
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/19 09:29 AM
2

So you'd rather not pay taxes but build your own road everytime you want to drive somewhere?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/19 09:16 AM
5

Being friendzoned typically means that you are supposed to provide the benefits of a friendship, it does not mean that you are also getting them in return.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/19 09:35 PM
1

"Google seems to be advancing a “flawed and incomplete sense of equality” by making sure men and women receive similar salaries for similar work, said Joelle Emerson, chief executive of Paradigm, a consulting company that advises companies on strategies for increasing diversity. " So paying people equally for the same work is now "flawed and incomplete equality" when it benefits men?!
/r/PussyPassDenied05/03/19 09:06 AM
2

Sounds intersting, do you have some links so I can read up in this? My intuition however would be that this is societal/environmental pressures overriding biological tendencies just because these societies are such a rare exception to the general pattern.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/19 12:51 PM
8

Societal attitudes are often an amplification of biological preferences. For men, there is the biological risk of raising the child of another man the more promiscuous their partner is.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/19 12:20 PM
32

And ruin his own life in the process, what a great alternative!
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/18 06:18 PM
1

What can I say? Love is not rational...I tried to make it work as hard as I could but at some point I couldn´t anyomore, so I made the hard call for her. Still pisses me off, but whats done is done...
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/17 06:56 PM
1

Cheated on my first girlfriend, mostly because she cheated on me twice before and my ego was hurt. Cheated on my last girlfriend while she was already ghosting me for weeks but refused to break up with me.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/17 04:27 PM
2

Nobody would give a fuck about "equal and opposite force" if a tiny dude would hit a much bigger guy. Everybody would think it's justified that the Lil dude gets trashed if he started the fight. Why not apply the same standards to women? tl;Dr: Just treat women like you would treat a smaller guy
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/17 08:05 AM
3

It´s not "blank slateism". The claim is basically that the between group variance is substantially smaller than the within-group variance to such a degree that these differences make more sense as individual differences than as group differences. That doesn´t mean that there are no observable differences between men and women on average, just that their predictive validity as group-based factors is pretty bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/17 01:04 PM
3

I dunno where you got that idea from but this stance is pretty common among social psycholgists... I do not agree with the interpretation because I think small differences across thousands of aspects can lead to fundamentally different outcomes but the idea itself is neither propoganda nor uncommon in psychology and neuroscience.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/17 11:28 AM
1

The friend with the most casual sex I know: rather short, maybe 5.5 very extraverted and silly tunesian roots extremely muscular, works out every day, does martial arts very short fuse, can´t deal well with critique/disrespect, has screamed at friends on multiple occasions, has been in court for breaking someones jaw, gets in trouble frequently when drunk no problem to approach strangers, very open
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/17 02:14 PM
3

It's not really about getting mugged though. If someone takes my wallet that's inconvenient but not a big issue. If some group of drunk assholes pick a fight with me, beat me to a pulp and then stomp on my head though, I'll be disabled and traumatized for the rest of my life. Shit like that almost exclusively happens to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/17 06:47 PM
1

this should be the top comment
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/17 06:44 PM
1

Sure, but I´d wager that even people in low income occupations will make society more money across their lifetime than is spend on them.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/17 12:58 PM
1

I think it's pretty obvious that poor people get more public assistance than middle class people and post fewer taxes. which doesn´t mean that they don´t create an overall net profit for society over the course of their lives.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/17 10:52 AM
1

You are making two assumptions here: 1) The poor are more likely to want to have abortions than the rich. Currently, poor people tend to have more children (worldwide and nationwide) than rich people 2) Children with poor parents do not constitute a financial net profit for society across their entire lifetime on average. I haven´t looked up the facts but if that was the case, I´d be truly surprised.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/17 11:18 PM
1

You have any hard data on that or is it just a wild guess?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/17 11:11 PM
1

Waiting on profits 18 years down the road is a terrible business model. Why do we have public schools then? Just because its a long term investment doesn´t make it a terrible business models. In fact, its what the whole national economy is build upon.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/17 11:10 PM
2

they already are
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/17 10:30 AM
1

When that child turns 18 though, it will start working and paying all sorts of taxes. In the long run, society will make more money off the vast majority of individuals than it spends on them.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/17 10:27 AM
3

For me it just gives of a cheap/pretentious/whoreish vibe, I dunno why...
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/17 10:20 PM
3

1) Being stupid/naive 2) smoking 3) wearing high heels
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/17 08:39 PM
3

How would you be able to tell if someone is there by car and won´t go home with an Uber/Taxi/subway? You can´t force your customers to tell you the truth.
/r/MensRights12/01/17 12:44 PM
8

Crucial Difference: Heroin is illegal, alcohol is not. What if I go to the store, buy a bottle of vodka, chug it in my car and then drive home? Is the cashier responsible?
/r/MensRights12/01/17 12:43 PM
1

No, I just wanted to make sure that your SO´s total size increased not just the size of...specific parts of him...
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/16 08:21 PM
1

Not sure what that means but for me, sex has gotten better over the years. We´re still talking about full body size right?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/16 08:03 PM
5

there is actually a cool experiment you can do with a class to illustrate this theory: Everyone gets a piece of paper on their foreheads with a number from 0 - 10. You don´t know your number but others can see it. Your objective then is to find a partner with a value as high as possible and make them "bond" with you. A bond can be broken to engage in a bond with someone else. After some time, people will end up with partners that have similar numbers. Even though they don´t know their number, th…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/16 03:55 PM
1

Yeah narcissists get laid more (the fact that TRP looks at), but they are only attractive in the short term I never said anything different? Why are you attacking claims that I didn´t even make? Looking at DT men and seeing that they are more succesfull doesn't prove that women are attracted to DT or want to be put down, abused and mistreated simply because that's not how DT men act. => *Women rate the high DT personality significantly more attractive than the low DT. *Structural modeling showed…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/16 03:17 PM
5

Often when guys complain about women dating assholes, they don´t understand that these assholes are not assholes towards their women. They are just assholes towards everybody else. The person they experience as an asshole could be totally different towards their partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/16 01:37 PM
7

It´s not only anecdotes, there also is some research indicating that Dark Triad men (especially narcissists) are more attractrive to women on average: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886913012245 http://spp.sagepub.com/content/4/4/461.short http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886912005363 http://psp.sagepub.com/content/39/7/870.abstract
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/16 01:26 PM
1

Thanks for linking this! I don´t know whether the questions: 1) Have you ever attempted unsuccessfully to have intercourse with an adult by force or threat of force? 3) Have you ever had intercourse with someone by force or threat of force? 4) Have you ever had oral intercourse with someone by force or threat of force? would´ve also been answered with "yes" by people who do consensual BDSM or roleplay for example. If so, this would bias the results. This could also explain the difference in self…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 11:23 AM
2

That sounds disturbing! If you can find the source again, I would be really interested in reading it!
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/16 09:46 PM
3

From my understanding, rape fantasies are at least as common in women (as in fantazising about being raped) as in men (fantazising about raping). That does absolutely not mean that women would actually like to be raped or men would actually like to rape. Its a fantasy that 99.99% of all people would never want to play out in real life.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/16 02:47 PM
1

1) Its literally the first thing that google spat out. It´s just a statement of somebody about one college. The situation might be massively different at other colleges, let alone other countries. It´s like trying to make a prediction about who´s going to win the election by doing a survey at one college. The "data" is just not suitable for inference. 2) Even assuming your figure was a valid unbiased estimate, it does not give us any information about WHY this figure is as high as it is. It´s li…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/16 12:16 AM
1

Really? You´re just reposting the google result that does not allow for any inference whatsoever (see above why)? There is a college where 0% of students are women. What does that prove? Exactly. Nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/16 11:40 PM
1

Where´s the data?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/16 11:11 PM
1

Read the last sentence, WV is past 30% in their engineering department. One department is not representative at all, especially since this was just the first thing that came up on google. In addition, there is no (empirically tested) causal explanation in this piece whatsoever. The statement When given the opportunity, women flock to engineering! Is thus more of a personal opinion or a hypothesis, given the "evidence" you posted Lets take this data for example: http://www.randalolson.com/2014/06…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/16 08:52 AM
2

Well your figure says 18 - 20%, not 20 - 30% but anyways. I would welcome it if we could achieve 50/50 ratios in all occupations without discriminating quotas. From my perspective, this is however very unlikely, because of biological differences that are not going anywhere soon. Of course nurture plays a big role, but nature does too.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/16 10:14 PM
1

a very tiny proportion of other women
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/16 01:43 PM
4

It's true. Normal people are simple thinkers who always jump to conclusions and never take any explanation. The fact that you just generalized over 7 Billion people while non-chalantly stating that you´re a special snowflake makes this definition apply to yourself pretty well...
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/16 01:42 PM
5

There is an attitude bias resulting in favoring women generally over men (in terms of overall attitudes). This effect is much stronger when women evaluate other women. "This research found that while both women and men have more favorable views of women, women's in-group biases were 4.5 times stronger[1] than those of men and only women (not men) showed cognitive balance among in-group bias, identity, and self-esteem, revealing that men lack a mechanism that bolsters automatic own group preferen…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/16 06:47 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter