TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

JumpXVI Archive

View 4 posts and 186 comments by JumpXVI on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vg_DYep6B4Y This one really takes the cake. Girl 1: "It would take exactly one hour." Girl 2 (the dumb one): "No it wouldn't!!! Girl 1: "There's 60 minutes in one hour—" Girl 2: "I'm going to prove my point..." Girl 1: "Your point is wrong, so you don't need to prove it..." Girl 2: "It's going to be right, so..." She then says "If you were going 80MPH, but you were speeding, then it would take you less than an hour." Girl 1: "But if you were speeding then you woul…
/r/TheRedPill17/11/15 07:46 PM
2

Of course it did, what kind of monster would shake a child?!?!!
/r/TheRedPill03/11/15 09:40 PM
0

How so? Just in that it's overwhelmingly pessimistic from the girl's point of view. A girl who dumps a guy for, say, two beta tendencies that he has as apparently corrected as is possible (like a promotion and being visibly more ripped), yet excuses a potential new "Chad" (Chad in her mind because hypergamy) she isn't really dating yet but is clearly a guy who isn't as ripped as her ex and doesn't dress as sharp as her ex, is just hamstering. Her "hamster" i.e. perception is negatively altered b…
/r/TheRedPill03/11/15 08:08 PM
1

And gentlemen, if you don’t think there are men out there who are thirsty, desperate, and willing to bang out a 38 year old 2 or 3, then I’ve got some land in the Florida Everglades I’d like to sell you. There's a gigantic difference between "bang" and "marry". And the kind of guy who is willing to marry a 38yo 2 or 3 is exactly the kind of man that is going to keep her hamster working overtime. The actual marital value of an actual 38yo 2 or 3 is pretty low and your point was about banging. But…
/r/TheRedPill03/11/15 06:50 PM
2

This is contrary to the very engine of TRP, or any self-improvement movement for that matter. If this were true, then any fitness-related, diet-improving, confidence-displaying, or SMV-increasing action any of us here at TRP takes would not stick "in most cases". No, it's much, much more about the female perception of things and her capacity to hamster anything that doesn't make her feel good. My ex lost 20 pounds, dresses sharper than he ever did around me, and got promoted??? Well he'll probab…
/r/TheRedPill03/11/15 06:07 PM
1

Well implied in such cases is that the man has already cheated...the service that B_uckets was describing is one where it isn't implied that your girl is cheating. Given than women can cheat at any time, men would simply be testing the fidelity of their women. If I suspected my woman of cheating I may hire a PI to check on her, but I wouldn't have the PI expressly enlist "some really hot, suave dude" to do a deed that's already being done.
/r/TheRedPill29/10/15 04:02 PM
4

I love how he qualifies the title of that show (We're better than you) for men: Have you ever fucked a dude just because he had a dick? Clearly the women have no real answer to this other than to spout: Y'all can get any pussy! Says a solipsistic woman who has no clue. The entire reason "men are better than women" is because we absolutely have to be to be attractive to them. Women will just never admit it.
/r/TheRedPill28/10/15 06:50 PM
1

Love this idea. The funny thing is that if you were to change the genders, a woman wouldn't know to fire her man if her hired babe successfully wooed her man, or to fire him if he doesn't take the bait, since "preselection" or SMV or whatever. Such a service literally doesn't even make sense for a woman since the driving factor isn't whether her man would cheat, but if he would. We all know women could cheat at any time, that's the constant. But women want to know their men can cheat, but won't.…
/r/TheRedPill28/10/15 05:52 PM
1

You've probably answered this before, but how did she net 71% gross when you had evidence she was cheating?
/r/TheRedPill28/10/15 05:20 PM
2

Fair enough. I guess I'm thinking primarily from a mid- to long-term perspective, where I'm less interested in winning short-term relationships (and thus not caring if she peaces out after a few weeks/months). I definitely don't give a shit if I get blown out by a few HB9s one night but get a HB7 instead, or even "have to" go home empty-handed that night, because it's not like I'll need to fill that hand with something to stroke my...ego (lol).
/r/TheRedPill23/10/15 06:17 PM
1

This is actually a really neat idea, going in with the express intention of getting blown out by a girl. One may "accidentally" succeed precisely because the target will sense how outcome independant you are. You very, very much do not give a shit if you get her number, and that intrigues her. One thing I do have an issue with regarding abundance mentality is when you say "one of the ones after that won't". I totally get that a man shouldn't care which one this may be, but this statement implies…
/r/TheRedPill22/10/15 04:16 PM
1

During our session she just said yeah, I know I said I was going to get an abortion, but I also know I’m narcissistic and self-centered and now I have an opportunity to do something for someone else (baby). Look no further than this to see why men often have a hard time placing their full trust in women. She not only hamsters away her admission that she would abort, but she actually uses two of her character flaws to justify it. Like, the actual act of having this baby is going to make her less …
/r/TheRedPill21/10/15 06:04 PM
1

Didn't even notice the headings were literally in alphabetical order till I came back to the tab and read "ABC" again in the title—marvelous work. The key is not caring. Being aloof. Saying and doing things you’d never do if you were worried how a woman might respond. Because the very act of doing those things indicates that you don’t care how (or if) she responds. Your entire concluding paragraph is gold, of course, but something specifically about these first few sentences gave me a light bulb…
/r/TheRedPill19/10/15 07:17 PM
4

Uh, the dread game he's running is absolutely giving her tingles. Read the sidebar. And the silent treatment is the opposite of "acting" in any reasonable way one can interpret the word "act". Is he supposed to literally stop moving and breathing so he doesn't fit your application of the word? Please.
/r/TheRedPill09/10/15 02:41 PM
6

You're telling me that a male being in a female locker room full of women who look anything like this chick and are half or completely naked doesn't prove the point?
/r/TheRedPill09/10/15 02:28 PM
-2

The way I see it, it's really more a function of how attractive she is on the "HB" scale than her propensity towards acting on her hypergamy, if we really want to disregard sluts being sluts just for fun sometimes (not trying to employ some commitment strategy). The rampantly hypergamous woman must assess her own SMV before even deciding to slut it up out of necessity. If she's an HB9, she is only going to be able to be a slut for HG10 men, which just mathematically and necessarily makes her not…
/r/TheRedPill08/10/15 08:50 PM
2

Even if we wanted to believe that men don't really want to commit, you've contradicted yourself: Why do men not understand that there is no (NO) incentive for a woman to squander her youth on one man? No incentive? The poor fickle man is going to lose interest when she gets older, so she'd naturally be incented to lock him up when she's young. Which isn't even touching on the "divorce rape" side of it which very literally has incented millions of women to "commit" to a man when she's young, unti…
/r/TheRedPill08/10/15 08:31 PM
3

Chad doesn't shower anyone with attention. That's what makes him Chad, and what makes a slut want to solve his mystery and get his attention, putting out if she has to.
/r/TheRedPill08/10/15 08:13 PM
3

For what it's worth, I could not possibly agree more with this line of thinking, if it helps to clarify where I'm coming from in the rest of this comment section.
/r/TheRedPill08/10/15 08:11 PM
-1

That helps me to understand a little better, sure...but doesn't that turn all women into insecure sluts, in a way? It's not all women with Marilyn Monroe–looks (for the sake and purpose of your argument I'm sure we can say/agree she was a 10) who wouldn't just "settle" for a movie star. In actuality, some HB10s don't shoot for the moon. Nor do or can many HB8s. Plenty of women are just fine making a guy they think is out of their league wait, or at least be really nervous waiting for him to cour…
/r/TheRedPill08/10/15 08:10 PM
0

Who would you guess is more attractive? Attraction, to a man, is not a guessing game. It is for a woman, oftentimes, because the characteristics of an attractive man can be faked besides the looks they don't care about as much as men do for women. It's like asking which prostitute is more attractive, the one who charges $100 or the one who charges $300? Obviously the latter because she's worth three times as much. Putting a price tag on attraction is literally the same thing as negotiating desir…
/r/TheRedPill08/10/15 07:53 PM
14

They're so far up their own gynocentric ass that they'll never try to see this from a man's point of view. I disagree. Sluts very much know that men want sex, and they try to use this and possible attractive looks to extract commitment from men. Where they fail is in not realizing that attraction and commitment do not go hand in hand from a woman's perspective. It's actually almost the opposite. The more eager a girl is to put out, the less he will want to commit to her, which is the way in whic…
/r/TheRedPill08/10/15 04:04 PM
1

Isn't it implied that women (and men) who are on online dating sites have very much opted into "meeting people?" It's not like we're talking about the most satisfied wife or girlfriend in the world here. And even if we were, what would she be doing on an online dating site (hint: you can do the same with that garage parking ticket of yours before you get back to you car)?
/r/TheRedPill07/10/15 07:15 PM
1

Exactly. One of the first places I went to with my gf in college was Wendy's, on a whim. She got a Classic Triple meal, and finished it normally. Oh, also, she ran the 400, 400 hurdles and 800 on our Track team, of which she was captain. I love McDonalds/Wendys to death. I just happen to eat it only ~8 times a year, which is twice as many as in my 20s if only because I'm realizing my metabolism and exercise habits probably don't care.
/r/TheRedPill07/10/15 01:38 PM
2

Who the fuck has time to go through a thousand messages where 99% of them are hey babe or "want sum fuk" or any number of nonsensical bullshit that so many guys use online? Listen, we get that Overchoice is a real thing. We really do. But of that 99% of those guys above, only 20% are in the top 20% physically, so a girl gets to eliminate a large, large majority of those choices immediately. It's not as though all the guys saying "want sum fuk" are 6'3" genuine underwear-model heartthrobs. Any pe…
/r/TheRedPill06/10/15 01:41 PM
1

Oh no, I would hate to have a plethora of 8s and 9s and 10s messaging me, and appeasing my biological need for validation, all without very literally lifting a finger. That's like if guys were so paralyzed by options when browsing porn sites that they just decided to close their laptops and not masturbate at all. Yes, I get that a decision a girl has to make regarding who to date is a little less trivial than the above, but give me a break. You know what you like, so pick it. Are you really gonn…
/r/TheRedPill06/10/15 01:36 PM
1

Be objective, be methodical in your assessments, learn your values, know your goals, practice practice practice- then fucking go. exit the nest you know where to find it if you need it again This and your whole post is beautifully written and carries a very important message. The latin title has doubtless signalled to the less curious subbers that they should "ignore" it, as though it were an eBay listing that didn't scream L@@K!!!, but I'm glad you caught my attention before heading home for th…
/r/TheRedPill05/10/15 09:16 PM
5

These are just words, though. If she'd said "sorry busy day, oh thinking when you're gonna ask me to move in :-P just joking xxxx" wouldn't you think she's a bit clingy? I also think that instead of "I'm considering us together" you should have said "I like you too, we'll see where this goes". The rest of your text was fine but "I'm considering us together" necessarily gave her the impression that you do not have abundance mentality, and that's a big no-no.
/r/TheRedPill05/10/15 06:14 PM
2

Plus there's the little double standard that's it's fine for her to artificially enhance her SMV, but if you don't "grow up that way," and instead have to consciously try to fix yourself, you're clearly a damaged tryhard rather than a natural and you belong in the beta box society has already assigned you. This is the part that always baffles me the most about the double standard. Imagine if men swarmed xxfitness and shamed the women in there attaining and maintaining fantastic shape. Are women …
/r/TheRedPill05/10/15 05:21 PM
1

I'm going to assume you're "deciding" to getting laid regularly, as that is the only thing that would make not masturbating "100%" easy. When my gf last year was living close to and then with me for five months, I masturbated exactly twice (once to porn). She moved out and that went back to 2-3 times a week (rarely to porn). Not ejaculating (NoFap) is a terrible idea. NoPorn is a good one.
/r/TheRedPill02/10/15 01:26 PM
2

I want to underline this because it's such a fantastic and baffling point. It's as though a girl can very literally "do no wrong". If the guy fucks up, she'll get pissed as him. If the girl fucks up, she'll eventually and invariably get pissed off at how the guy made her feeeeel. And if he is "careful" not to ruffle her feathers and make her feel bad about fucking up, he's essentially just aiding and abetting a criminal, if not altogether being a pussy-drying walkover who will encourage future f…
/r/TheRedPill30/09/15 06:38 PM
1

And that's even before accounting for the strong correlation of J-cup women with obesity (the fatter a woman gets, the larger her breasts get, regardless of her genetics). So it's like "Are you a DD with a 24-inch waist?"
/r/TheRedPill29/09/15 06:10 PM
1

I didn't understand your sentence fully so I added in bold what I think it means, can you confirm please? No qualifier necessary. The literal, physical act of sticking a penis into a vagina is much less difficult to achieve than committing to a partner. You could meet your soulmate tomorrow and it can be love at first sight, but when will you have committed to each other? It might not even happen if Chad Thundercock comes by and catches her and her hypergamy off guard and something "just haaaaap…
/r/TheRedPill29/09/15 01:22 AM
1

And I would argue that that sting comes hand in hand with not valuing how much what you as a man have to offer. I do think that you've intentionally exaggerated a bit for emphasis, which I get. Any man who actually feels this way about himself needs to improve his own SMV first (and self esteem, though those come hand in hand). I want to stress that even high-SMV men can get blown out by an HB8 he wants to fuck. You actually bring up a very interesting point. Is any given chick "just" attracted …
/r/TheRedPill25/09/15 07:13 PM
3

Right, and this is exactly why my scenario started with the HB6 rather than some dream scenario where Victoria's Secret models are offering caveat-free sex but only to you. Sure, a guy would love to be able to earn to "right" to fuck Adriana Lima, but assuming that gaming a woman as hot as that is as difficult as one would imagine, and you have her HB6 makeup artist willing to drag you into her office for a good 10 minutes, you're gonna take the latter. If only because both girls aren't even mut…
/r/TheRedPill25/09/15 06:41 PM
52

But she didn't get what she wanted. She got what you wanted. But not what she wanted. Exactly. It'd be like if Shaq were jealous of how well Kyle Korver shoots threes. Like, why are you jealous, Shaq? You don't need a jumper, you're arguably the most dominant center to ever play in the NBA.
/r/TheRedPill25/09/15 06:29 PM
1

Then as I said, her argument is a decade old because realdolls* have presented the same physical value that these sexbots do, just without all the bells of socialization and whistles of interaction. Think about it—if your characterization of men is true, then a man is not going to spend thousands more** on a sexbot over a realdoll just so he can get an answer when he asks "was it good for you?" *I'm not googling this at work or intimating I know a damn thing about realdolls **Again, not googling…
/r/TheRedPill16/09/15 01:16 PM
7

When she states that these sexbots will perpetuate a "view that a relationship need be nothing more than physical", she paints herself into a logical corner. Such purely physically appealing bots would actually be the exact sort of litmus test for the type of men a woman should desire anyway. Real women can and will offer a quality man (one not interested in sexbots) much more. But her feeeeelz make her miss a point she could easily refute: "The physical act of sex will only be a small part of t…
/r/TheRedPill15/09/15 01:56 PM
5

I quickly found a job but decided to only start after the 3 months were up. In her eyes though, I had lost status…I was “unemployed” and my perceived utility had declined (Brifaults Law). This fascinates me. I'm sure you explained to her what garden leave is if she didn't understand it, and her mind just couldn't logically process what it meant. Just like it couldn't process that you quickly had another job in hand already, so in essence you had a three month paid vacation. If her weird little b…
/r/TheRedPill10/09/15 03:02 PM
4

I'd be careful with this, since women derive a lot more from "friendship" with the opposite sex than men do. Any ex of yours that you treat just like any other friend is likely to frame it in her head as you being her orbiter, and the emotions of a breakup is extra fuel for that kind of hamstering.
/r/TheRedPill09/09/15 01:27 PM
6

I wouldn't say that this is applicable to the vast majority of women (and by extension men). Also, he's not that bad looking (quickly searching other pics)...implying looks matter nearly as much to women. It doesn't get any more status++ than "Youngest billionaire" and "cover of Forbes". Spiegel 's wealth is essentially like having eight pack abs and a huge, perfect dick. So it's not that Miranda's options are limited. She doesn't need a man for money, and can have like literally any professiona…
/r/TheRedPill18/08/15 05:13 PM
1

A great point. And even further, our less tame biological urges as men drive us to be physically attracted to every good-looking woman, yet we are shamed for having "wandering eyes". We're also biologically programmed to spread our seed far and wide in those good-looking women we literally (and biologically) can't help but notice and be driven to want to put our seed in. But, of course, men in LTRs definitely have to reign that in. Even further...it would seem that female hypergamy would be at o…
/r/TheRedPill10/08/15 01:50 PM
2

But, in a way, I understand how these girls feel. I can relate if we talked about how I feel about my job. I love it, but I'd trade up in a second But to be fair to you, a young man is actually expected to climb the corporate ladder. This is where the comparison fails hard. Because otherwise, we'd be encouraging women to climb a rung of cocks, up and up, branch swinging till they reach some magic tree house. Even though it's 2015, and feminism, and AWALT and all that, the second we actually star…
/r/TheRedPill07/08/15 02:11 PM
84

I honestly believe he is the only one who could ever handle me. Wait for it... So tell me, why am I cheating on him? Waiiiiiit for iiiiiit... My husband of two years is...the kindest, gentlest, most patient guy...I honestly believe he is the only one who could ever handle me. This isn't even out of context, as the ellipses are "journalistically integrous". This chick not only verbalizes but literally writes out something her hypergamous hindbrain is still incapable of processing. She can't see t…
/r/TheRedPill05/08/15 06:44 PM
4

Why on earth would you identify yourself as a feminist to a group of women, not deny it when called on it, and expect them not to think you're a white knight, let alone expect any remote tingles from any of them?
/r/TheRedPill29/07/15 05:53 PM
1

I did, that's not the comment that was quoted. "Stop whining, bitch" is not constructive and actually implies his own actions with the girl have been flawless and she's just AWALTing. He obviously doesn't feel that's the case, which is why he's asking for advice.
/r/TheRedPill29/07/15 05:49 PM
1

He's not whining at all and he's definitely not a bitch for noticing that a girl he's seeing seems more distant and asking us what he should do about it. /u/metalhead4, the truth is that she probably doesn't care about your great grandfather passing. Which on its face would make a person coldhearted, but because women are solipsistic creatures, it means she really is actually less capable of empathizing with you about your loss and how it's made you feel than you would think is reasonable. Her t…
/r/TheRedPill29/07/15 01:28 PM
3

Women's feelz are their power, and ignoring that power gives them no power.
/r/TheRedPill28/07/15 02:18 PM
1

Basically, I said "Oh. Okay." To both. That's it. They both came at the same time as a literal numbered "list". I'd call it LMR (last minute resistance), but like I said, I wasn't interested in sealing the deal asap for some +1 notch count. We were being intimate, but I wasn't escalating aggresively, so she wasn't "resisting" as much as she was checking her own desire to fuck. And then hamstering it away the next date when I similarly did not aggresively escalate. We were fooling around again, a…
/r/TheRedPill27/07/15 08:46 PM
1

Eh, I landed one LTR after not having gotten laid for over a year (graduated in a LDR and a shitty job market). The frame you should really be projecting is one that doesn't place that pussy on a pedestal. I had her (new girl not LDR girl) in bed within three dates, after swatting away the "I have to know the guy is into me" shit test and the "my third HPV dose is in three months I shouldn't have sex until then" shit test that was evidently only slightly less subjective. I just didn't care how f…
/r/TheRedPill27/07/15 07:19 PM
8

While I am all for self improvement, it does not translate perfectly to success with women. Exactly. Because nothing translates perfectly to success with women. Which is precisely why everything a man does should be for himself.
/r/TheRedPill24/07/15 01:07 PM
43

Women get this sort of power rush when they know they can use desire to mess with the mind of men; it's like a vice grip on their balls that she gets to control. Fantastic point, and it applies further to every stage of sexual relationships, from first sight, to plating, to dating, to LTRs, and to TRP on hard mode (marriage). You took control of the relationship when you asked her out and then escalated. Friendzoning is really a shit test if you think about it in this context—if you allow a girl…
/r/TheRedPill23/07/15 01:23 PM
4

This left me thinking, if she don't care/doesn't want me why would she look at me like that and be offended by my rejection. Because you threw a bucket of sand on her thirst for validation and approval, when you had formally represented yourself as a nice warm beta glass of "you're beautiful i don't want to just fuck you". You should double down on this by not contacting her at all and maintaining the frame of you being the prize and not caring about her attention. And you actually need to belie…
/r/TheRedPill21/07/15 05:17 PM
13

Rather than provide a gynocentric business model about investing in women and letting them choose, we've told men how to invest in themselves and take what they want. Here's the thing about the shitty businesss model this feminist imperative is. Women think they're this ATM of the most coveted, moist vagina a man could want. And they are an ATM alright, but not in the way they think. See, women don't want a men who want them to write any sort of check so men can get something of value from them.…
/r/TheRedPill21/07/15 02:42 PM
1

You are still missing the point, somehow. A person actually has a literal, legal, right to divorce their spouse if they suspect him or her of cheating, so of course I'm not surprised at how she's acted. OP saw him with another woman himself so it's not like this is he said she said shit. You gloss over the stated fact of his cheating like it doesn't matter, that there's only "bully and coward", that his suspected cheating was not in any way a catalyst, and that's either trollish or bullheaded.
/r/TheRedPill20/07/15 03:27 PM
1

Again, leap of logic. You're like the Superman Of Jumping To Conclusions. OP's dad is still alive, so I don't think it's much of a leap to assume that OP's mom didn't kill him. And which one of us decided that OP's wife must be fat because statistics and therefore OP's dad must have lost attraction and therefore his cheating is justified? People say stupid shit sometimes when they are extremely pissed off—I'm not going to place much stock in a "death threat" after my wife finds out I cheated on …
/r/TheRedPill17/07/15 06:02 PM
1

This is a fantastic point that I think is sometimes lost on otherwise red pill men. OP and those who place more blame on the wife here are going to have their confirmation bias leave them with a "lesson" that you should never ever get married ever at all. Forgetting that marriage has been the product of millions of happy, productive children, and can continue to be even in "Marriage 2.0" if an man follows the same red pill tenets that make this sub what it is. Whatever merit "don't get married" …
/r/TheRedPill17/07/15 02:26 PM
1

So you're taking the words of a woman at face value then? From what I can tell, OP's dad is still alive, so "I'm going to kill you" may just have been an angry empty threat from an actually scorned woman. If you cheat on your wife, lie about it to her face, and then think that being told you're going to be taken to the cleaners and having your every move watched makes your wife crazy, you're delusional. Her reaction was completely normal and shouldn't surprise any actually red pill person in thi…
/r/TheRedPill17/07/15 02:06 PM
4

So she's a psycho loony bitch because she got cheated on and lied to about it, and reacted like a woman. Nice. If she straight up divorces him 10 years ago, and takes half his shit and the kids, she's Mother Teresa all of a sudden?
/r/TheRedPill16/07/15 04:18 PM
3

You're talking like a chick (I didn't call you hysterical, don't put words in my mouth) because you invented, justified, and maintain reasons for OP's dad's infidelity. Just so you feel better about his infidelity and lying. That's what chicks do. And you're also implying that anyone who gets cheated on deserves it, because they probably got fat, or stopped putting out as much, or started being beta, or whatever. OP really needs to validate your hamstering by saying his mom is fat and ugly? Like…
/r/TheRedPill16/07/15 04:08 PM
3

Yeah, and he actually made a third one by denying it in the middle of those two mistakes. To both OP (saw him in car with other woman) and OP's wife. If he didn't actually do anything his third mistake (your second) is compounded because why would you put up with false accusations etc. And yes, OP's mom may have made the same mistake, she should probably have just divorced him. Her life wouldn't be so full of paranoia if not, and plus there's the whole "divorce rape" thing.
/r/TheRedPill16/07/15 03:44 PM
5

Bro, you're literally talking like a chick here. Men are driven to cheat for many, many more reasons than "my wife got fat". You're also assuming that OP's dad wasn't attracted to his wife around the time he was cheating. Cheating would be easier to justify if it were a dead bedroom situation but OP didn't state that (because how would he know). I'd think that the most objective case against a man in divorce court is infidelity. If you are married, and you cheat, you deserve to get divorce raped…
/r/TheRedPill16/07/15 03:37 PM
2

Sexual strategy is amoral. OP's dad's wife is now dictating his life because his strategic moves were to cheat and then deny. It's really as simple as that.
/r/TheRedPill16/07/15 03:07 PM
4

Are you even listening to yourself? You are actually hamstering a reason to justify OP's dad's infidelity by assuming his wife is or became a fat "hag". The legality of adultery is actually a moot point as well. Even if this idea of "real men" that cheat on their wives on the regular is tenable (it's not), sometimes those "real men" are going to get caught. And then they are either going to get divorced raped or treated like OP's dad. OP's dad wishes that the only consequences of his cheating we…
/r/TheRedPill16/07/15 03:04 PM
12

How on earth this is being downvoted is beyond me. Is TRP really so "never ever get married ever" that we'd blame this denialist cheater's wife for doing things a well-treated woman would do in a heartbeat because AWALT or whatever before blaming the husband?
/r/TheRedPill16/07/15 02:46 PM
108

Never let a woman dictate or change your life. Is this really the lesson you've taken away from this, and want to leave TRP with? A better lesson is: Don't cheat in a LTR. For all the AWALT and hypergamy that frustrate men about women, the absolute worst thing you can do as a man is to give a woman, especially your wife, a genuine inarguable reason to "dictate your life".
/r/TheRedPill16/07/15 02:40 PM
5

She is a hypergamous cheater, plain and simple. In a situation as unpleasant, uncommon and unfortunate as this, it would normally be silly and probably heartless to say "plain and simple". Her actions, however, prove it: She didn't break up with him after the rape She demonstrates she is actually capable of intimacy, just not with her bf She "does not want to lose him" She still rebuffs her bf's intimate advances after demonstrating she is actually capable of intimacy Listen, you're allowed to b…
/r/TheRedPill13/07/15 06:31 PM
2

Interesting hypothesis. And if she didn't give a fuck about her bf beforehand, to the point where she would actually use an awful tragic event in her life as a veil to justify cheating, she is doing a gross disservice to rape victims.
/r/TheRedPill13/07/15 03:53 PM
43

But she's "cooooooooomplex", duh. Message her this: "I'd consider buying you a pizza if your thighs weren't already way too thick."
/r/TheRedPill08/07/15 03:24 PM
2

Dread game works better if you don't spell it out. She will do all the thinking for you, including hamstering whether your walk/run is actually you getting your desires/expectations met tonight and not tomorrow.
/r/TheRedPill07/07/15 01:56 PM
11

Your mother is literally bipolar, bro. Attempting to ascribe a fair deal of red pill meaning to your dad's inability to hold frame with a woman with BPD is an exercise in futility. In this case, NAWALT actually applies, because not all women are bipolar. This may sound mean, but your dad very literally stuck his dick in crazy, actual crazy. Don't blame him for not being able to hold the frame you'd've liked.
/r/TheRedPill02/07/15 03:22 PM
3

Wait, you're turning this into a racial thing? lol. Don't make excuses for a guy who has "won the genetic lottery" AND "probably has" a high IQ. I could easily argue that women desire the Bradley Cooper lookalike with average game a lot more than some smooth-talking but weird-looking black guy.
/r/TheRedPill02/07/15 03:15 PM
3

I think it's funny when men are outspoken about wanting sex from a woman (or showing her the door) that's it's "objectifying" women, but women can say "u buyin" and get no real flak. Never gets old how annoying this double standard is, and in this scenario, the woman makes $5,000,000 a year and actually identifies as progressive. If you can't actually affect token progressiveness when you're a multimillionaire, you are fucking hopeless. It's literally the equivalent of a less than a dime for the…
/r/TheRedPill25/06/15 12:43 PM
1

It is trivial relative to virtually every other relationship, in the sense that their separate financial success makes this microcosm much, much more micro than it would be in a relationship of normal financial success. A better "deceptively nontrivial" microcosm for the two would be how much cleaning up Hannah is expected to do in their place (assuming they live together, who cares), or whether/how fast Derek is expected to change light bulbs or whatever since you can't (easily) attach a dollar…
/r/TheRedPill24/06/15 09:46 PM
8

Congrats, you missed the most obvious double entendre in the world
/r/TheRedPill24/06/15 05:48 PM
11

Yeah I'm as gay as can be bud lol
/r/TheRedPill24/06/15 04:21 PM
4

I mean, I agree with you, but there's a pretty big difference between actually insisting your man pay, and literally not doing anything when the check comes (but possibly thanking him when he pays). Tons of women do the latter. I'm never going to fault any woman for not reaching for the check one time, no matter how much she makes.
/r/TheRedPill24/06/15 04:17 PM
11

That's the part that gets me the most. The court of public opinion is actually advocating gold-digging, even if the woman is a multi-millionaire. Why can't it be the case that Derek and Hannah both happily realize that who foots a $20 pizza bill, thanks in large part to their separate success, is trivial? This is actual social justice, and the rest of the world is depressingly missing it.
/r/TheRedPill24/06/15 04:07 PM
4

I think her options are a bit less binary than that. Really doubt Jeter paying $10 extra on dinner is going to be a dealbreaker. She has everything to gain by suggesting halfsies or even doing it, and I'm glad she did. It would be interesting to see how Hannah would react before she and Derek actually started dating. More interesting than what they do now for sure.
/r/TheRedPill24/06/15 03:56 PM
6

As if white women would never do the same thing. Keep this racist shit out of here, TRP already has a target on its back as a "hate sub". Unless it's okay to only say this if the woman is black?
/r/TheRedPill24/06/15 03:18 PM
6

I meant "win" from the perspective of someone who holds Jemele's views on who should pay. Obviously Jeter is winning when his gf splits a dinner date bill, regardless of who she is. Hannah was in public too, by the way, and literally nobody can question whether she has more status and options or actual SMV than Jemele. Yet she was very much "caught" going halfsies (regardless of whether it was a publicity stunt). So I question your premise.
/r/TheRedPill24/06/15 03:15 PM
4

Sure. My LTR is long distance, so when I visit, you know what's going down. Obviously, abstaining from ejaculating is a good idea for several days prior to keep libido high, but I wanted an even more effective solution. So I tried ballooning for three sessions, a week prior to my New Year's visit. The first seven days prior, the second five days, and the final one just two days before I left. Throughout that week, I sprouted several truly random boners—like, "I'm watching basketball or reading i…
/r/TheRedPill12/06/15 03:17 PM
4

Don't mention it, man. Discovering these things has been just as helpful in my life as has been discovering the red pill, so I'd be selfish to not share them given such an opportunity. And fwiw I virtually never even masturbated more than three times a week, so it wasn't like I was some drastic case of overmasturbation -> zero sensitivity/libido ever...just less than I would have liked during actual sex. But trying noporn and ballooning helped a ton more than I would have imagined.
/r/TheRedPill12/06/15 02:00 PM
2

If you ever feel like jacking off after your endless approaches, you're not doing a very good job.
/r/TheRedPill11/06/15 09:46 PM
3

Thank you for giving this topic such a well-written look. I'm actually excited (and relieved) that I didn't step on your toes and that you indeed have a totally different definition/application of "regulated" here.
/r/TheRedPill11/06/15 07:00 PM
6

I would argue that her firing those bullets for you endears you to her more than having so few bullets makes you complacent. Those who spin multiple plates successfully keep spinning those multiple plates because they know that if Amy is busy tonight, that's cool, cause Becky or Carlie are probably down for some sex. If they felt the drain of complacency from having had sex each of the last three nights or whatever, they wouldn't feel the need to text Becky or Carlie or even Amy that night.
/r/TheRedPill11/06/15 06:58 PM
6

This is a great question. Not consuming porn helps to get your mind off of the dopamine-charged setting that the bevy of ridiculously saturated and instantly available sexual images and videos can drown your brain in. Actual sexual intercourse cannot mirror the long exposure to these extremely erotic images, even if you always fuck just as long as you would have fapped to porn (which is unlikely). The reality of a genuine sexual setting will not sap your "power of honry". You should consider a "…
/r/TheRedPill11/06/15 06:34 PM
38

Great follow-up. I want to highlight one specific part: In addition, the only situations where masturbation can be viewed as non-destructive is when it is both regulated and porn-free (I can’t stress that enough). By far the most important takeaway from this Power of Horny series. And as this series applies more to men who aren't successfully spinning multiple plates with very little effort (less "hungry"), or men who aren't in sexually-satisfying LTRs, I want to address a potential conundrum. Y…
/r/TheRedPill11/06/15 06:24 PM
2

It's really simple when you think about it with red pill knowledge, too. If you don't tell a hot girl she's hot in the "dating phase", she will literally think: "um, wait, does this guy even think I'm attractive? I mean, I'm pretty sure he does, but, like, does he? maybe he's had better...oh gosh maybe he has better right now...or maybe he's into me not cause of my looks?" Not complimenting a girl is simply a refusal to acknowledge her value. This literally makes her demonstrate (additional) val…
/r/TheRedPill09/06/15 02:32 PM
21

The last time this happened to me in public, the girl said: "Geez, you have really nice abs...", and proceeded to feel them through my shirt. So I stepped a little closer, maintained laser eye contact, and gently squeezed her ass. She said "Hey!" I simply said, "if you're gonna feel me up, I'm gonna feel you up too". She protested, "well...feeling my midriff too would be equivalent..." But I gave no fucks. This was before I ever swallowed the pill too. She'd had a boyfriend, who actually showed …
/r/TheRedPill08/06/15 03:43 PM
29

This can really be boiled down to relative value and its demonstrations (DHV/DLV) if we want to simplify it. A hot girl (HB8+) knows she's hot, so she knows she has high value (HV). An "average" girl (HB6-7) knows she's kinda hot on a good day. Any guy who verbally acknowledges the value of a woman gives her validation of her HV. This validation actually serves to confirm the HV of the HB6-7 girls that they are indeed having a "good day" (HB8+ girls need no such validation even if they love it a…
/r/TheRedPill08/06/15 02:00 PM
2

Ah, gotcha. I thought you were conflating your earlier example of WonderTits™, where you don't even know the chick, with a scenario where you're back at a girl's place or her yours and you're "waiting" for her to jump your bones just like x porn star does. Thanks for the clarification.
/r/TheRedPill03/06/15 01:17 PM
49

Porn has does two things to our subconscious: it sets our sexual standards and causes sexual complacency. I believe this is the tl;dr for the lazy here, and it's a marvelously intriguing idea. NoFap and hard rebooting are tried-and-true methods, of course, but you posted this in TRP for a reason. I would love for you to expand upon how, if at all, porn could be used to actually set realistic sexual expectations (rather than just no porn ever), as this could be more beneficial than just quitting …
/r/TheRedPill02/06/15 08:22 PM
32

We believe, subconsciously, that a woman who really wants to sleep with us will approach us and behave in the manner we’ve seen in porn. I have a hard time reconciling this. Most hardcore these days doesn't even have a plot, it focuses on the chick stripping or whatever then the dude comes out of nowhere and she starts blowing him. Any actual attraction, comfort or seduction (the stuff you need to establish to bang any woman you're not paying for sex) that comes before sex in any remotely realis…
/r/TheRedPill02/06/15 08:10 PM
13

That what I am thinking too. Is a girl never allowed to send a transcript to another college if she has a boyfriend? This situation is more relationships than it is TheRedPill, since this seems more about not communicating about potential barriers in the relationship (tolerance for distance) than anything else. Do you even know why she wants to transfer schools? That's a really random thing to just "bring up" when talking about your day. If she's your girlfriend and not just a plate you should k…
/r/TheRedPill02/06/15 12:58 PM
2

Girls on Facebook who are seeking validation can't help themselves and their hypergamy. The smarter ones know they should probably maybe consider settling down, but that instant validation that 24 new friend requests, 31 new messages and 14 matches on Tinder gives them an easier thrill than locking down Chad Thundercock does...and they definitely have to work at the latter.
/r/TheRedPill01/06/15 03:54 PM
5

The thing is that they don't have to fight over the next 20% bracket of men. A female 7 can literally just smile at a male 6 if she wants him to take her home and fuck her. But even the top 20% of men still have to fight a little to get laid.
/r/TheRedPill01/06/15 02:37 PM
2

Heather, without missing a beat, delivered a running soccer kick to the man's nether regions. Sounds really really made up? Who says "nether regions" unironically? And what kind of dude spits on and attempts to punch a woman who simply tells him he can't grab her friend's ass? Oh, the same kind of ("larger") male who just so happens to essentially pick a fight with Ronda Rousey. Convenient.
/r/TheRedPill01/06/15 02:14 PM
3

The man unable to fend off the better fighter, desperately grabbed at Leslie's hair and in vain resorted to fighting like a girl. Ironic how no woman will object to #likeagirl being used pejoratively if it's levied at a man, one who (allegedly) deserves it.
/r/TheRedPill01/06/15 02:10 PM
1

She did rape him. Amy didn't do anything really bad here. My skull may be too thick to comprehend this, but I thought rape was bad?
/r/TheRedPill31/05/15 08:35 PM
1

This is another reason why men shouldn't get married - she has no accountability for any of her actions or choices, and he is held responsible for everything. This isn't "another" reason at all—you're simply stating the same reason to avoid marriage that is stated over and over again here (one I actually somewhat agree with, lest we forget that the point of this thread was "unless you want children"). You deferring to the wisdom of the experience of "guys whose lives have been ruined by divorce"…
/r/TheRedPill31/05/15 08:20 PM
1

Let me state again that this was never supposed to be a post advocating marriage, but to some extent, this back-and-forth couldn't be helped, so oh well. All women don't act on their hypergamy all the time,,, but over a long period of time,, they all will be likely to act on it at least once,, and that's really all it takes. Again, in marriage / divorce it's different, because she's not necessarily choosing one OVER the other, she gets to have both to a large extent, if she chooses. Why do you t…
/r/TheRedPill30/05/15 07:09 PM
1

Again, this is confirmation bias. We are on TRP. I don't think all those guys would tell you they were divorced in spite of being alpha. I would almost argue that if you are red pill, and you get married, and you still get "divorced raped" (not just divorced), any fingers should be pointed at you because you knew what you were getting into beforehand.
/r/TheRedPill30/05/15 04:00 PM
3

If "get a family plan" and "get a cohabitation agreement" were ever included with the "never get married" posts and threads I see, I would never have had to post this. As it is, an unqualified "never get married" can fuck up more lives than anything I wrote, for the reasons I stated in the OP.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 08:42 PM
0

My logic necessarily does not apply to the men who want children in states without common-law marriage laws (a reality I previously acknowledged when I stated "in many states"), especially since this was never a post expressly advocating marriage in the first place. This is, again, a post about the end game of raising your kids right. The men who live in states without common-law marriage laws (and are aware of this) never had to be worried about being divorce raped in the first place, because t…
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 08:30 PM
1

That is precisely my point, thank you. I'm definitely more wary about marrying than I was before I swallowed the red pill. But I'm not about to let that affect my desire for children, especially when common law can screw me either way. TRP theory should be applied religiously into LTRs, and I firmly believe that it reduces the chance of divorce. My failure to do this is how I fucked up with my last LTR, and I almost married the girl too.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 07:52 PM
2

My logic only seems backwards to you because you chose to read this as a post advocating marriage, which it is not. This post is directed at men who want kids down the road, and who are being influenced enough by "never get married" posts to literally post that they're never getting married or having kids. Logically, if a man plans to have kids, but doesn't marry because of the risks associated with marriage ("divorce rape"), he will still subject himself to these risks thanks to common law marr…
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 07:40 PM
3

You are welcome—I know it isn't a popular outlook here, but I firmly believe it. I don't feel that TRP tenets have to extend to parenting issues, necessarily, but I do agree that kids are the future, and it's futile to even argue this. It's why I get a little frustrated with "never get married" responses to field reports here, and especially frustrated with "never have kids" responses which I see here from time to time too. It seems really MGTOW to me to have a "never have kids" mindset, and it'…
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 07:25 PM
-1

I do. (lol.) You can legally be divorce raped even if you aren't actually married to the mother of your children. This makes the "divorce rape" argument moot as far as raising children effectively is concerned (as I've argued it anyway, with mother and father under one roof).
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 07:11 PM
0

I explicitly stated that committing to the mother of my children is trivial. The "end-game" is raising your kids right, which will best happen, I've argued, when you cohabitate with the mother of your children, regardless of whether you marry. And that since, in many states, cohabitation without actual marriage poses the same exact legal risk of "divorce rape", the argument that marriage is a bad idea is a poor argument.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 07:07 PM
3

Thank you for weighing in with a well-developed and -reasoned rebuttal. You raise an especially interesting point about relative SMV. To that, I ask: if she feels her SMV is relative to mine after we get married, doesn't she also have to feel she can land the richer, handsomer, more athletic, Fortune 250 CEO for me to worry about her hypergamy (regardless of whether we are married)? I do agree that for a man there is a lot of power in the ability to walk away, and it's hard to marry (heh) that w…
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 07:00 PM
1

The title of this article is irresponsible clickbait. I read Schumer's gala speech, and nobody "raped" anyone. I don't care what was posted in AskFeminists, but we here should know better. We should be very annoyed at the "if the genders were reversed" scenario, and very annoyed at AskFeminists spinning it that he raped her, like /u/EeeeeeevilMan said. But saying she "raped" him is playing right into "their own retarded feminist definition of rape" as he put it, and that's even worse because it'…
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 06:20 PM
28

And it's funny how solipsism only applies when it has to. They'll never accept that a tight body and a feminine attitude are the largest determinants of their SMV. Oh, they accepted it just fine back when they were in college, passing the Boner Test of every heterosexual guy with a working libido. Back then, their education and success somehow never came up at parties and nightclubs that Chad Thundercock whisked them away from regardless. No 19-year-old HB8 ever seduces a guy with her knowledge …
/r/TheRedPill21/05/15 05:26 PM
2

She stated that another reason she decided to report this incident was because, based on what Jane Doe was told by Professor Dirks, John fit the profile of other rapists on campus in that he had a high GPA in high school, was his class valedictorian, was on [a sports] team, and was 'from a good family.' So: valedictorian well-raised athlete are predictors of being a rapist at Occidental? Nice college you have there. If it isn't obvious, this is actually worse than if they had found that a certai…
/r/TheRedPill20/05/15 05:38 PM
1

I highly doubt that Meghan Trainor will stick to this new..."diet". The benefits of furthering her fat-acceptance, entitlement persona of being "all about that bass" and laying out a 463-bullet point checklist for her "dear future husband" far outweigh (heh) those that she told some reporter she's gotten from eating chicken and broccoli to "clear her lungs".
/r/TheRedPill18/05/15 06:56 PM
2

I think alphas do try to stamp out this behavoir. There are just more thirsty betas than alphas to go around (and around, and around, on her cock and validation carousel). This is precisely why we try to spread Red Pill ideology far and wide. Girls won't/can't acknowledge it consciously, but they're actually more attracted to the guy who doesn't validate her on a whim.
/r/TheRedPill18/05/15 04:19 PM
2

“Just because I am not saying anything doesn’t mean you have to stop talking to me xoxo.” Can we stop to think about how fucking dumb this is for a second? This girl: wants validation for literally nothing is used to receiving validation for literally nothing actually acknowledges that she had put no effort into earning your validation proudly flaunts this fact instead of attempting to be desirable in her text. Like "this is how it works—you are to validate me, constantly, even when it is obviou…
/r/TheRedPill18/05/15 04:11 PM
3

When I used condoms I almost never put them on in broad daylight or bedroom light, let alone was paranoid enough to check my own sealed condoms for pinholes. If that dude was telling DaphneDK the truth, that condom company would have been found out by someone who would have noticed a pinhole and reported it. If the condom hadn't been put on a penis yet, such a person wouldn't have any litigious motive to raise the issue.
/r/TheRedPill18/05/15 02:45 PM
20

They literally just did math to extrapolate the results: How the numbers were calculated: The probability that a woman doesn't get pregnant at all over a given period of time is equal to the success rate of her contraceptive method, raised to the power of the number of years she uses that method.
/r/TheRedPill18/05/15 02:15 PM
6

If you are a strong, alpha male, your Amused Mastery will keep you awake and unscathed in any so-called "SJW nightmare", if there even is one. The focal point of the post, for those who couldn't (yet) be bothered to read it, is this: There's been a growing number of Social Justice Warriors - activists who use internet outrage and social aggression to push their idealistic moral agenda based on a hierarchy of oppression-based status. Their approach isn't to help the weak or disadvantaged, it's to…
/r/TheRedPill15/05/15 04:07 PM
3

Looks like you've got a dozen great years ahead of you, yaardi.
/r/TheRedPill14/05/15 07:03 PM
7

Hmmm, alcohol is an "impairing substance." I guess this means that the "1 in 5 college women are raped" figure (that's definitely true and certainly not actually 0.03 in 5) can be adjusted upward to 4.5 in 5?
/r/TheRedPill14/05/15 06:49 PM
6

I would suggest not eating her out to see how she reacts, which kind of sucks because you probably enjoy doing it for her since you actually like her otherwise and it's an LTR. That is somewhat balanced out by the fact that you don't really love blowjobs yourself, but like you said it's the principle. Don't ask for one anymore, that's definitely more beta than alpha as you suspected. If anything, tell her you want her to suck your dick or just say "go down on me" dominantly. It seems she's sexua…
/r/TheRedPill14/05/15 06:27 PM
6

First read this as: but what you're really doing is acting like she's a 4 without the a, and it had the same effect. Most responsible teenager in the house.
/r/TheRedPill13/05/15 08:11 PM
1

I think if you'd added some insight of your own rather than just posting a link, you'd have gotten more positive responses. As it stands all you really did was link us to a short, bad article.
/r/TheRedPill13/05/15 08:00 PM
2

You're right...you shouldn't mind this, then— And then get up and sit on her lap. Not to crush or hurt her, obviously, but don't fake it either. You're trying to squash her stupid little shit test instead, which is all this was. This also, and more importantly, sexualizes your interaction with this girl in a public venue. Regardless of whether you wanted to pursue anything with her, these are the kinds of experiences that both demonstrate and improve your SMV to all women, present (literally) an…
/r/TheRedPill13/05/15 07:55 PM
6

•Campus Reform facetiously asked students at Georgetown University if urinals should be removed from on-campus restrooms in the name of gender equality. So yes, it is a joke. Also a joke: At California Polytechnic University, students recently held a “shit-in” to demand lol
/r/TheRedPill13/05/15 04:07 PM
2

Thanks very much for the DL on this, that's hilarious and sad. When they get special treatment for no other reason than "they are attractive women", (ie: when gender dynamics actually help them) they credit their savvy, intellect and insight. The ironic thing is that this sideboob touching thing presented a fantastic opportunity for Tessler to do just this. With any savvy, a girl would overlook or even encourage quasi-flirtatious behavior from potential investors to get the resources they want f…
/r/TheRedPill12/05/15 03:36 PM
3

Everyone who uses irregardless unironically does so out of ignorance or a misspeaking (likely conflating irrespective and regardless). /u/ell000 is being friendly and genuinely trying to be helpful, which is the only thing that really matters here, but I'm glad you equate that to autism.
/r/TheRedPill12/05/15 03:13 PM
1

Your usage of "will be" and "gaining ground" indicates that I can't be "wrong" that today, irregardless does not please the crowd. I might be "wrong" the day the majority of people prefer to say irregardless instead of regardless, but that day isn't here (and we should hope it never comes).
/r/TheRedPill12/05/15 02:51 PM
0

Pedant: A person who annoys other people by correcting small errors and giving too much attention to minor details Correcting /u/ell000 on his erroneous but trivial misstatement that "irregardless" isn't a word, given that he meant to point out its incorrect usage in this context, is by definition pedantic. (And yes, I'm aware of the irony of this exchange, lol.)
/r/TheRedPill11/05/15 08:22 PM
-3

Don't be pedantic. Even if you were to accept the usage of "irregardless", anyone who uses it is using it wrong because its meaning is the same as "regardless". Which is kind of why nobody should use the "word" "irregardless".
/r/TheRedPill11/05/15 07:44 PM
2

A lot of guys think that learning new pick-up lines, improving their wardrobe or putting on some peacock hat can take the place of a genuine surgical approach to success in the sexual market. Any one of those things may have some small effect on a given night, but are they really going to transform you into the confident, strong-framed, outcome independent alpha male that should really be your goal? I think that's a primary reason we've distanced ourselves from PUA as a practice. Learning lines …
/r/TheRedPill11/05/15 05:32 PM
42

For being the CEO of an online dating startup, Tessler sure seems curiously ignorant of how interactions between rich, powerful men and the women who want something from them go. Let's see...is it because she's a victimized SJW, or trolling for more exposure to her site via a CNN article? You decide!
/r/TheRedPill11/05/15 05:04 PM
3

You might be victimizing your penis to death grip. Actual, realistic sexual stimulation cannot mimic the tight, chokehold squeeze that many men use when masturbating. Lighten up and you should see improved results, especially given that you don't use porn. You may also want to cut back on masturbating the days before you know you're going to get some. Don't expect to climax with your girlfriend at night if you've already cranked a few out earlier in the day. It's not like you need to, since you …
/r/askTRP11/05/15 01:26 PM
2

The user who posted that is a dude named /u/varicose_veins.
/r/TheRedPill09/05/15 08:13 PM
11

You're putting the cart before the horse. The people who don't consummate their marriage on their wedding night were both blue pill as fuck before the dude ever even popped the question. Your newlywed wife will never look more beautiful than on your wedding day. She will never feel more beautiful. She will never be told more times that she looks amazing and gorgeous and wonderful. She has essentially had professional makeup attention paid to her all morning, and has spend the last several weeks …
/r/TheRedPill09/05/15 08:05 PM
2

Good, thanks for clearing that up. Your response to her definitely showed traces of alpha and were probably better than 95% of the kowtowing she gets from other guys, so you may have sparked genuine interest. I do wonder if she realizes that her plan wouldn't work if she was planning that, and that's why she was eager to put her number in your phone. It's curious when a girl volunteers that she has a boyfriend. though. It's probably just a case of plausible deniability, since she agreed to going…
/r/askTRP07/05/15 06:47 PM
0

Am I the only one who saw this as a textbook case of a girl using a guy's attention to get what she wants? OP, she clearly just wants to get into the bar before her birthday, or have you and other dudes shower her with more attention on her birthday at your bar. You thrust your phone at her and ask for her number right after you deny her access to the bar. Why wouldn't she give it to you? Why wouldn't she flirt with you to get what she wants, since you've indicated that you're interested in her?…
/r/askTRP07/05/15 06:22 PM
3

You never had any "participation in this community", though. Instead of attempting to leave TRP, a place that had such a positive impact on your life, better than you found it, or leaving quietly, you opt to lecture us on your way out the door we never heard you come through in the first place. Congrats.
/r/TheRedPill07/05/15 02:57 PM
1

I can't remember the last time a girl didn't pull out my dick and remark on how big it was (Oh my god it's WAYYYY bigger than my ex's dick!) Dudes, I'm not packing an intense amount of heat. It's not a porn star's dick. These bitches will say anything they think they need to say to achieve their goals. If inflating your ego is one of the steps they think they need to take, they will do so shamelessly, and will tell you that your shitty cunnilingus made them cum 7 times in 3 minutes. And maybe he…
/r/TheRedPill06/05/15 08:07 PM
-1

That's more on your own beer goggles and a disregard to her below-the-head attributes than her. Kudos to any girl who can legitimately add 3+ points to her SMV just by applying makeup, but they don't exist. I'd be much more miffed at being decieved by one of those miracle bras that add two cup sizes anyway.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/15 07:37 PM
6

Dude, it's only "evil" because the guy was older than the random picture in his profile. Actual evil would have been any of the real, life-threatening risks I detailed above. Disingenuous, yes. But not evil. I'm sure this Sylvie chick would be pressing charges if the man were a better-looking, richer friend of the male model pictured instead.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/15 07:16 PM
1

Trust me, I love walking so much. Honestly love it, I legit carry a pedometer with me every day. It just has to supplement real exercise and lifestyle changes if you really want to lose fat.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/15 06:23 PM
12

This case actually underlines the differences between male and female sexual pleasure pretty neatly. 342 women let their sexual drive literally blind them to potential danger. 342 men are not going to agree to blindfold themselves before getting into bed with someone whose pictures indicate she's a young, 5'9", cute yoga instructor with a great rack. Most, if not all, are gonna want to know if she looks anything like her profile pics. But visual cues aren't nearly as important to the sexual plea…
/r/TheRedPill06/05/15 04:56 PM
5

People behave unethically and it's YOUR job to protect yourself! A woman who spreads her legs for a man in the dark is also unethical, or at the very least not concerned with ethics or identity or commitment, and is a much greater threat to the species then some old man draining his ball sack into a few sluts. This point cannot be stressed any more. The current university narrative is that a slutty, provocatively dressed girl who buys herself way too many drinks bears little to no responsibility…
/r/TheRedPill06/05/15 04:39 PM
25

Literally every bad thing that can happen to a blindfolded woman with an unidentified man in a strange place. And 342 women voluntarily did this. Simply because they expected the French Brad Pitt and some 50 Shades of Grey Poupon. So it's not a question of right and wrong—it's a question of risk. If a dude gets punked into a date with an "OKCupid surprise land-whale", he might be annoyed that she misrepresented herself, but what has he risked in going to the date? Losing some time, maybe some ga…
/r/TheRedPill06/05/15 04:09 PM
15

It would be different if the guy blindfolded the women himself before they got a chance to see him, but: When she arrived she said she covered her eyes They all did this to themselves, which is a key distinction as far as a court case is concerned. What's more: she got into bed with the man, who she thought was handsome, with brown hair and blue eyes. Haha yeah, please use that argument in court. My devil's advocate ass just so happens to think the real guy is actually quite handsome. And he has…
/r/TheRedPill06/05/15 02:58 PM
85

Exactly. These women are lucky that the worst thing that happened to them, when they agreed to blindfold themselves before getting into bed with a man they met on the internet who said he wanted to have sex, was that...a man they met on the internet wanted to have sex. This kind of shit is how horror films start.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/15 02:25 PM
109

If the genders were reversed, not only would there be no outcry from any of the 342 men, even though looks are far more important to guys, but you'd have SJW feminists supporting the old menopausal harpy who would try this, bleating that "Looks don't matter! Men are so shallow!"
/r/TheRedPill06/05/15 02:02 PM
12

TO BURN FAT The trick is to do mild exercise such as brisk walking, slow jogging etc. Give me a greak, dude. This may be ideal for 45-year-old dude who don't have the time to do a proper workout, but this sub's demographic is 18-35yo men who are looking for drastic overall life improvement. Walking an hour a day is horseshit advice for this—it'd be like telling someone to do one cold approach every other day when the goal is to be effortlessly comfortable interacting with beautiful women. Lift (…
/r/TheRedPill06/05/15 01:52 PM
17

Because adult life is full of boredom and compromise, we look for ways to recapture our lost youth and the overpowering feelings of young love. This point in particular is crucial to the understanding of women, and how Amused Mastery and "asshole game" (essentially childlike game) is so effective. Is a girl whose hair you just playfully yanked going to feel bored? Hell no. Is a girl going to feel like she is making a concession of her pussy to some dude who offers nothing but beta bux to her? Yo…
/r/TheRedPill05/05/15 06:58 PM
1

Women are like bowling: The higher her (pi)n-count, the less you're interested in her.
/r/TheRedPill01/05/15 07:19 PM
3

This isn't even your fault—Vasalgel and Vagisil are almost perfect anagrams, at least linguistically. Marketing really messed up on this name, and it is probably going to hurt sales quite a bit. Naming really, really matters, especially for new, unique products and you'd be surprised how much is spent on focus groups for just this purpose. It's not even a gel—not in the way we all think of gels (topical use). Why not name it "Vasinjex" or something that actually connotes both the vasa deferentia…
/r/TheRedPill30/04/15 04:17 PM
2

Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice... As charismatic as you say your best friend is, how smart can he have been to have not one "unplanned" kid, but two? Unless he was actually sperm-jacked or whatever by the "chubby bitch" that is his gf, I'm placing the blame on your buddy who had much more to lose.
/r/TheRedPill30/04/15 04:01 PM
1

Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Richard E. Denner to Denise Rossi: In Soviet Divorce Court, divorce rape rapes you. *bangs gavel*
/r/TheRedPill30/04/15 03:29 PM
1

The unending narrative here in TRP is "don't marry cause divorce rape". From this perspective alone I would rather be involved long-term with a woman who demonstrates an interest in financial independence than her twin who exhibits any gold-digging characteristics. Whatever anyone has to say about the value a potential LTR brings to the table, "gold diggers" and "financially independent women" are, objectively, almost completely mutually exclusive. There's a happy medium somewhere in the rather …
/r/TheRedPill29/04/15 05:38 PM
7

Why should you have to officially cut things off with one of your plates, if you're simultaneously making it clear that you're not sexually exclusive? Branch-swinging as girls practice it implies "selective monogamy", which is really just hypergamy. It kind of sounds like you were spending more time and effort on the logistics and relationship aspects of interacting with the girls you were sleeping with. What you did is essentially let go of one of the branches of two trees that you already had …
/r/TheRedPill28/04/15 02:30 PM
12

This may sound harsh, but if a woman asks how much you make, and you're not actually a broke, 30+, directionless schlub, then one of two things are at play. Either: you have not signalled high status to her (BB), you are not absolutely destroying her in bed (AF). It's really curious that your now–ex-gf wouldn't have "rationalized" your status as a young engineering student as "he'll be making money soon so I wanna stay with him". If you have not repeatedly left her with the impression that you w…
/r/TheRedPill28/04/15 01:43 PM
2

Yep. A woman's solipsism concentrated into one word. "...sweety?" Her hypergamous hindbrain cannot possibly fathom how he would have any issue whatsoever with what she just told him, because "well of course it makes sense that i want alpha fucks and beta bucks, he said he's short himself, surely he'd agree that his genes are inferior and it only makes seeeeense..."
/r/TheRedPill28/04/15 01:02 PM
1

lol, if you find it so easy to equate a defense of the OPs singular post to "butmad arch nemesis pedestalization of every psycho with a blog", you're better at exaggeration than the chick who wrote this.
/r/TheRedPill24/04/15 09:30 PM
6

If this post is directed at our collective significant others who don't rerack weights, I'm all for it. Some women at the gym, though, who lift, and don't rerack weights...are single. And if I were single, these things would be on the top of my list when looking for any girl: frequents the gym actually attempts to lift weights is single It opens itself up for a marvelously easy neg, too. Furthering your example of the squat rack, you can tap her on the shoulder (waiting for her to remove headpho…
/r/TheRedPill24/04/15 05:33 PM
1

Enjoy the denial phase, where radical feminist journalists are "people just like everyone else" and it doesn't matter what they think or want or say or do because you're an apex alpha. Even if I were in some anger phase or whatever you still appear to be one behind me in Denial. A big part of the Acceptance phase you're fronting comes when you "learn what those instincts are" in women, which you're resisting.
/r/TheRedPill24/04/15 03:28 PM
1

If you have a mental illness, maybe address that concurrently with getting into the gym phase. "I don't like people and that's it" applies to women too, so if you're at all here to improve your interactions with girls, then it doesn't matter what equipment you buy on your own.
/r/TheRedPill23/04/15 03:29 PM
2

Here's the problem. How many guys are thinking themselves into a shitty situation? Spending time analysing instead of doing? This can just as easily be applied to "read some shit about men", though, which is what you suggested he do instead. Outcome independence borne out of ignorance is no better than someone contributing an exceptionally controversial piece from "the enemy" as food for thought. Radical feminists' self-interests are destructive to both men and women, so yeah, they're the enemy.…
/r/TheRedPill23/04/15 03:04 PM
3

To be fair, knowing what the enemy (radical feminists) are thinking, and telling otherwise acceptable, untainted women to think, isn't the worst thing for guys to be aware of sometimes.
/r/TheRedPill23/04/15 02:05 PM
4

It’s not easy to forever be the leader, spending the days being the boss. Taking the reins at work, being in absolute control over everything all the time – even though we’re more than up for it, it’s still a tough job. This eyeroll-inducing bravado would be cringeworthy even if it were written by the most alpha of men. To hear it from some feminist lesbian hamstering why she likes to be dominated is downright laughable. She ends with this gem: Sometimes, at the end of the day, we just want some…
/r/TheRedPill23/04/15 02:01 PM
1

You've had your dissenters because it is simply not very well stated or implied that you were not one bit surprised, either then or now two months later, by Daphne's reaction, let alone that your comment was as calculated as you have later revealed it was. If you had prefaced that party exchange with your exact disclaimer: I am not, by default, a nice man. I have an excellent understanding of social dynamics, and I derive far more benefit from playing with people than making them think I'm nice.…
/r/TheRedPill22/04/15 05:52 PM
4

I didn't misread anything, my unedited post says verbatim "this is why you wanted to fuck with her". We all know what "fuck with" means. I actually enjoyed your example of smacking the asses of 100 girls in a club, and your breakdown of expected reactions. The real takeaway of both this illustration and your actual interaction with Daphne, though, is that "reality" is absolutely not going to be perceived the same way by women in dynamic social settings. One could make a game of smacking the asse…
/r/TheRedPill22/04/15 02:22 PM
12

You painted your buddy's fiancée as someone who is ungrateful for you having essentially saved her life. In actuality, you intentionally embarrassed her over something that happened two years ago, and knew that in that context and setting she would never express any gratitude to you. Your comment would have embarrassed a nontrivial percentage of men who are not really your friends who are with their SOs at the time. I'd understand if you did it because you were annoyed at never having been thank…
/r/TheRedPill21/04/15 08:53 PM
2

Well, no one is ever going to call Chad Thundercock a slut, besides maybe the Eva Averages who are largely invisible to him unless it's a random off-night Wednesday where the Carols are few and far between. He's sought after by starstruck girls who seek the challenge of changing him, with a night or two of some fine alpha dick as a consolation prize should they fail. And he's envied by most men because he has it so easy with women, even if he's not always the best loooking, or richest, or even m…
/r/TheRedPill21/04/15 06:14 PM
23

Imagine the entire episode a year or two ago happened to Freddy instead of Daphne. And the first thing you say to your bro you haven't seen since it happened is: "Dude lol last time I saw you you were passed out on the bathroom floor of that pub! You’re lucky the paramedics came quick…” Do you think his girl is going to see him in a more flattering or less flattering light, being reminded of this? Same scenario—happened to him, first time you've seen him since...but instead of Daphne, he’s broug…
/r/TheRedPill21/04/15 05:56 PM
2

And tend to lose the good ones sooner or later.
/r/TheRedPill20/04/15 08:51 PM
5

I absolutely agree with the "everyone loses" mentality, if it's considered a long-term game like you're setting it up. Beta men just lose a hell of a lot harder, because at least the HB8.5 rode on as many cocks as she wanted in her physical prime. Even if women don't enjoy sex as much as men do (which is probably a myth), I'm pretty sure they get something out of it. A beta male's physical assets in the sexual market are wasted for essentially nothing. Yes, a man can always make more money later…
/r/TheRedPill20/04/15 08:25 PM
5

One of the more overlooked side effects of swallowing and fully digesting the red pill is that it brings a true purpose and meaning to one's life. When you're having battles about your hesitation to finally pull the trigger, but they aren't about that single set HB8 in the bar last night and are about your own pistol and your own life, it puts into perspective how this movement is really not about raising your notch count but about improving your life. Those battling depression are almost univer…
/r/TheRedPill20/04/15 02:38 PM
16

Yeah, it would be one thing if anti-pump & dump carousel watchers like this with a princess mentality actually looked anything like Disney Princesses, which is where women derive much of their SMV. I might be up to the task of gaming Cinderella or a Belle who is pretty much objectively a 10, especially when my challenges are more "keeping her in my frame and off her pedestal" than "worrying about her hypergamy". But today's women have a selective interpretation of such fantastic (literally) tale…
/r/TheRedPill17/04/15 03:04 PM
89

In about 10 years, she is either going to settle for the same 6-7 that she is now (but won't be when she hits the wall, how ironic), or she will relax her little list of "qualifications" the moment an alpha male changes her stilted worldview and activates her tingles. Oddly enough, this isn't the worst kind of woman in today's society. Her traditionalism has eliminated two awful character traits for young women, in that she's absolutely: not on the cock carousel, and not a feminist. She may be o…
/r/TheRedPill17/04/15 02:01 PM
1

What must a woman believe to be true about the world to make fake tits a good idea? All she has to believe is that her sexual market value is largely dependent on how good she looks in a bikini. I say bikini instead of simply talking about breast size for one crucial reason. I ran Track & Field in high school and college, and was constantly surrounded by girls who could easily feature in any lingerie catalogue or high-end adult film from the ribs down. But many of them had merely average chests,…
/r/TheRedPill10/04/15 05:08 PM
5

Just want to underline how great a field report this is. For anyone wondering how effective dread game is, or worried that it may backfire when it must be applied overtly, this story should calm your fears. Neither of you thought it would work as well as it did, you expecting her to "know" what you were doing, and she not expecting to feel such rekindled attraction for you afterwards. Your outcome independence was genuine though, and it guided your perspective and actions (and inactions) in a wa…
/r/TheRedPill01/04/15 05:40 PM
2

I checked that my roommate would be home, and moved forward on a first come, first shovel basis. If she'd continued using Tinder "the normal way", she would have had some guy shovel her car out on a first come, then shovel basis. Too bad her ASD (that's "anti-shovel defense" for those scoring at home) wouldn't allow her that pleasure. I love how she opens with that glorious: "At first, I was responsible. When it snowed, I shoveled" hamsterese. Follows that with "But for some reason"...indeed. "S…
/r/TheRedPill17/03/15 07:57 PM
163

If this chick had actually wanted to just see him cry, she could have backed up his videos and handed him the hard drives on which she would have moved his stuff after whatever stuff she told him about "letting emotions out". But she actually wanted to hurt him, meaning she's beyond crazy and downright vengeful and destructive. lol at her actually being confused at him leaving...like his somehow now "being human" in her mind is the only consequence of her actions, and they can now go back to wha…
/r/TheRedPill12/01/15 05:13 PM
2

Sure...usually the male inclination is to buy a girl a drink, in hopes that it can lead to something more. PUAs and the manosphere have suggested that guys tell girls to buy them drinks, for a number of reasons that include demonstrating your own high value and projecting that you are the catch. In this context, BrainBabble could have easily said something like "Great! We should celebrate, let me buy you dinner at [x]..." and it wouldn't have had quite the effect that his actual course of action…
/r/TheRedPill05/01/15 10:28 PM
2

I know where you're coming from, I would just give the OP and most anyone a bit of a pass in a setting like this, where any "nerves" could have more to do with "public speaking" jitters than even any remote social anxiety, let alone a slightly-beta lapse. OP's point was perfectly rational. The fact it elicited shock, yet no one could counter it is hilarious to me. Yeah, I'm saying in general and actually making a reference to heartiste's sixteen commandments of poon (the 11th one to be exact upo…
/r/TheRedPill05/01/15 08:12 PM
2

Love how you flipped the script here. There are two distinct methods (at the least) that you used that I wouldn't have picked up before swallowing the pill. You told her qualify herself. You told her to take you out to dinner. First, the uninitiated are always trying to qualify themselves for attractive women, and don't know why it doesn't work. Here, you not only have her engage you on a prior experience you shared, you hint that while she may have won over her boss, you may not be so easy. It'…
/r/TheRedPill05/01/15 07:56 PM
7

He was probably taken aback by the silence, and given the nature of a dinner party, that silence plus dozens of eyes boring holes into you can shake your frame if you weren't expecting to have to hold frame in the first place. I phrase it like this because while it is a great mentality to have to maintain an (irrationally) confident, aloof, unapologetic disposition, not every context calls for it, certainly not a dinner party where you may just be trying to chill for a bit before the main course…
/r/TheRedPill05/01/15 07:20 PM
5

It's like once you hit your 30s, there is pressure on you to marry, the opportunity to sleep around is not there as much (you have to find the time), and you're no longer "young". Who is pressuring you to marry once you hit 30? Not the 18-22yo girls who are the subject of your post. Who cares about "time"? You can find the time to spin your HB8+ plates come over to your well-furnished apartment after you're back form work, and kick them out before you have to go to your great-paying job. Who car…
/r/TheRedPill11/12/14 09:20 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter