Junglejibe Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
42	Just found this sub and I want to say I'm so proud of all of you		Junglejibe	/r/ExRedPill	01/05/22 05:02 PM

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	New study shows that 5% of men sleep with 66% of young women. Will society destabilize from most men being neglected? It’s actually ridiculous to compare humans, who have a complex and functioning society that brings reality to abstract concepts such as bigotry and morality, to animals that have no notion of sexism let alone a deeply prejudiced society based on patriarchy. Your understanding of social and institutional issues is embarrassing and having this conversation is actually fruitless so I’m done here. It will probably take you a while to understand and digest the things I’ve already said anyway, if you …	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/10/23 09:14 PM
1	New study shows that 5% of men sleep with 66% of young women. Will society destabilize from most men being neglected? Yeahhhh…like I said, very dumb.	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/10/23 09:03 PM
1	New study shows that 5% of men sleep with 66% of young women. Will society destabilize from most men being neglected? How would pair bonding solve the laundry list of reasons why abuse towards women is normalized and protected by our patriarchal society exactly? You seem to think that phrase is a magic pill that would fix everything, which once again is you showing yourself to be ignorant on the entire issue.	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/10/23 08:29 PM
1	New study shows that 5% of men sleep with 66% of young women. Will society destabilize from most men being neglected? Dunning-Kruger effect in real time. You have so little knowledge of the social, institutional, and political constraints that both normalize abuse and protect abusers. It’s going to be difficult to explain this to you because you think you’re intelligent enough to not have to learn what you’re talking about; that your simplified understanding of reality is reality because you’re just that smart and special that you don’t need to educate yourself in order to be an expert. Physical aspects of abus…	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/10/23 08:15 PM
1	New study shows that 5% of men sleep with 66% of young women. Will society destabilize from most men being neglected? LOL	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/10/23 08:05 PM
1	New study shows that 5% of men sleep with 66% of young women. Will society destabilize from most men being neglected? Single syllables, got it: you are wrong and dumb. It’s not a solution at all.	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/10/23 07:06 PM
1	New study shows that 5% of men sleep with 66% of young women. Will society destabilize from most men being neglected? Okay, I’ll spell it out for you since you’re struggling so much to understand: Your fetish is not a solution for domestic violence. Hope that’s simplistic enough for your brain to process it, or should I stick to single syllable words?	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/10/23 06:55 PM
1	New study shows that 5% of men sleep with 66% of young women. Will society destabilize from most men being neglected? Oh so you’re just a fetishist enforcing his kinks on everyone like they’re a legitimate worldview. Got it.	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/10/23 06:40 PM
1	New study shows that 5% of men sleep with 66% of young women. Will society destabilize from most men being neglected? LOL swing and a miss buddy but so is most of your worldview so that’s ok.	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/10/23 06:39 PM
1	New study shows that 5% of men sleep with 66% of young women. Will society destabilize from most men being neglected? Funny I have the same advice for you. Take the gay pill and stop bothering women. Fuck an incel and save society today!	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/10/23 06:26 PM
1	New study shows that 5% of men sleep with 66% of young women. Will society destabilize from most men being neglected? Oof even more dated. Are you going to call me a spinster harlot next? Or maybe “Ooga booga uggy female grunt grunt”	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/10/23 06:01 PM
1	New study shows that 5% of men sleep with 66% of young women. Will society destabilize from most men being neglected? Aw it’s baby’s first internet argument! How cute. Just a tip: blue-haired feminist is pretty outdated. You should probably try wokescold or wokoid next time.	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/10/23 05:56 PM
1	New study shows that 5% of men sleep with 66% of young women. Will society destabilize from most men being neglected? This is true regardless of medication. There have been multiple nation-wide studies on it, meanwhile only a very small fraction of people take antidepressants. I think, unfortunately, you might be the one coping. Sorry for your loss kiddo.	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/10/23 05:48 PM
1	New study shows that 5% of men sleep with 66% of young women. Will society destabilize from most men being neglected? I don’t think you understand morality at all. Forcibly flushing someone’s brain with chemicals against their will or knowledge in order to force them to do something that is beneficial to you and that they otherwise would have never done is the exact opposite of choice. You would essentially be medically handicapping and quite honestly participating in the rape of every single woman on earth, simply because they preferred their solitude to putting up with shitty men who might abuse, assault, or …	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/10/23 05:45 PM
3	New study shows that 5% of men sleep with 66% of young women. Will society destabilize from most men being neglected? I feel bad for the women you’ve been on relationships with. You sound insufferable and creepy. Not to mention the whole N*zism ideology you have. What about the women who are sad and struggling because their rights are being stripped away because people like you think them popping out babies is more important than their bodily autonomy and right to self-realization?	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/10/23 05:33 PM
5	New study shows that 5% of men sleep with 66% of young women. Will society destabilize from most men being neglected? Oh look, another guy would genuinely prefer eugenics over women having agency and a choice because he can’t fathom maybe just being a better person to have women interested in him instead.	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/10/23 05:25 PM
4	New study shows that 5% of men sleep with 66% of young women. Will society destabilize from most men being neglected? Women are as a whole both happier and live longer when they are single, so it looks like you’re just wrong there. Forcing them to marry/commit to a relationship with a man for the rest of their lives would overall harm them.	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/10/23 05:23 PM
1	I never understood this concept when it comes to sex Yeah sorry but your logic doesn’t track. I don’t really give a shit what a guy did in previous relationships if what he’s doing right now makes me happy. And if it didn’t make me happy, we’d break up. But that wouldn’t have anything to do with whatever happened in his past. And yeah, I would be fine with his outlooks changing. He doesn’t owe me gifts now just because he happened to spend his money differently in the past. He’s a free man able to make his own choices, and again so long as the rel…	/r/PurplePillDebate	25/11/22 10:58 AM
2	I never understood this concept when it comes to sex No. Low value Men don't go around being fat, broke, and ugly while approaching the most attractive women (8-10). Much less think they are entitled to sex or companionship. Except I and every woman I know has been approached by exactly that type of man. Especially beautiful women. They're constantly practically harassed by those types of men. Ran through and damaged women go around asking for more from men, including more resources, be their therapist, be taller, more dates, chiseled fit, more en…	/r/PurplePillDebate	24/11/22 08:32 PM
7	I figured out what men dislike about women, sometimes, in the context of dating: cowardice. > Talking on a post about how men don't respect vulnerable women and suggesting that people don't force vulnerable women to be brave Are you serious? Oh also people call women gold diggers, leeches, low value, and lazy all the time. Both genders are beaten up over daring to be weak.	/r/PurplePillDebate	24/11/22 07:55 PM
2	Should anything be done about the low birth rates and high single parenthood in western countries? I mean they've been pretty infamous among academics, journalists, and some UK politicians for being biased towards the right wing & having that reflected in their studies, to the point of being inaccurate in order to promote their anti-immigration message. The general consensus seems to be "take it with a serving bowl of salt".	/r/PurplePillDebate	24/11/22 07:51 PM
1	I never understood this concept when it comes to sex This sounds like a child having a temper tantrum because his brother got a bigger toy than him on Christmas. People's outlooks change, and having hookups doesn't mean you've signed a contract to always have sex with someone as early as possible.	/r/PurplePillDebate	24/11/22 07:41 PM
3	I never understood this concept when it comes to sex So what you're saying is men exhibit the exact same behavior the OP is describing in women, and that they also approach it in a way that forces woman to engage in the behavior of not sleeping with a guy they like because he would consider her "only for sex". Sounds like you answered the OP's question right there.	/r/PurplePillDebate	24/11/22 07:38 PM
0	Should anything be done about the low birth rates and high single parenthood in western countries? Bias has no place in research. That is objectionable enough in itself.	/r/PurplePillDebate	24/11/22 07:24 PM
10	Should anything be done about the low birth rates and high single parenthood in western countries? Do you think having a family guarantees old people to be immortal or something? Everyone withers and dies, family or not. It's kind of what we do.	/r/PurplePillDebate	24/11/22 07:24 PM
1	“Feminists used to be nicer.” Yeah, not so much. Wait so are you…against women voting? Are you saying you agree that the women’s suffrage movement was unnecessary?	/r/AntiFeminists	09/06/22 12:24 PM
-1	I was banned from r/blatantmisogyny for (seemingly) no reason, and the moderators refuse to tell me why. I swear, that sub is run by children You can’t be both a feminist and antifeminist. That is the most simplistic example of mutual exclusivity you will ever see. I’m not even talking about political viewpoints, it’s just a failure in basic logic and you’re kneejerking over my political views too fast to even realize that.	/r/AntiFeminists	06/06/22 08:20 AM
-9	I was banned from r/blatantmisogyny for (seemingly) no reason, and the moderators refuse to tell me why. I swear, that sub is run by children calls himself a feminist literally posts on r/antifeminists I couldn’t write a stupider character if I tried.	/r/AntiFeminists	06/06/22 04:34 AM
-1	Woman celibrates turning 21 by getting drunk and stabs an innocent man in the head with her stiletto. pleads guilty, recieves a $174 fine and no convictions. You're gonna get hella downvoted on here but this is king shit. It's not that fucking hard to just not sleep with drunk people. If you're tipsy and someone's drunk, don't sleep with them. If you're tipsy and someone's blackout, don't sleep with them. I've been pretty drunk before and am still able to easily tell when someone else is completely out of it, and guess what? I never even want to sleep with them. Some people on here are just rapists and don't like facing the reality that their past ac…	/r/MensRights	22/05/22 07:40 PM
2	it was worse being a man than a woman in the 1900s Like I said, call it whatever you want. And don't pretend to know me. Just because I care about women's issues doesn't mean I don't care about men's. You don't know what I do in my life, nor who I've cared for, fought for, stayed up all night to help. You don't know what organizations I've donated my time and money to, what protests I've gone to, who I've argued with or stood up for.	/r/MensRights	06/05/22 08:45 PM
1	it was worse being a man than a woman in the 1900s Because it's a) not obvious -- if it was, there would be plenty of studies for you to link--, and b) any large scale claim made needs large scale statistics to back it up. It's ridiculous to say more women lie about rape than women who are raped. You asked me for sources so clearly you understand that your claims need statistics and sources. Give me some fucking sources before you make ridiculous suggestions like that. "It's obvious" is not a rebuttal and you know it. You clearly didn't read the…	/r/MensRights	06/05/22 08:38 PM
1	it was worse being a man than a woman in the 1900s Why do you find that doubtful? What, have you been spectating my life or something? Men and women’s problems are both caused by societal standards and teachings that put men in the stoic, manly protector role and women in the weak, innocent caregiver role. Whatever you want to call that, go ahead, but it’s a problem & causes undue suffering.	/r/MensRights	06/05/22 08:18 PM
1	it was worse being a man than a woman in the 1900s Edit to point out: if you look just even a little bit further in the report, it says 14.8% are victims of completed rapes and 2.8% are victims of attempted rates. which is closer to 1 in 6 but barely a difference. It's not like the numbers went drastically down like you're suggesting (again, could've answered this for yourself if you were actually interested in the sources and not just trying to "win" the argument). So your proof for "the number of reported rapes is higher than the number of rap…	/r/MensRights	06/05/22 06:56 PM
1	it was worse being a man than a woman in the 1900s What, the responses that provide statistics and examples that directly contradict your absurd claims -- claims that you don't back up with any evidence or basic logical thought? Yeah, I'm sure you'd think so	/r/MensRights	06/05/22 05:45 PM
1	it was worse being a man than a woman in the 1900s "No u". Great response. Gives me nostalgia to kindgergarten.	/r/MensRights	06/05/22 05:38 PM
1	it was worse being a man than a woman in the 1900s The rest are issues I'm specifically referring to because western women face them. Those are all things that happen to women in America. What an amazing way to advertise how completely ignorant you are on the entire topic. What, did you somehow do negative research to arrive at your "conclusion"?	/r/MensRights	06/05/22 05:33 PM
1	it was worse being a man than a woman in the 1900s The survey was done in 2009 and was done by the Department of Justice. But there is actually a logical fallacy in dismissing evidence offhand without even looking at it because it rejects your worldview (which, to spell it out for you, is exactly what you just did). A huge logical fallacy, actually.	/r/MensRights	06/05/22 05:30 PM
1	it was worse being a man than a woman in the 1900s https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/183781.pdf https://childusa.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/2020-Report-on-Child-Marriage-in-the-US.pdf Both statistics are incredibly well known; I'm surprised you had to even ask.	/r/MensRights	06/05/22 05:28 PM
-2	it was worse being a man than a woman in the 1900s The type of matriarchy where 1 in 5 women are raped and 97.5% of those rapes go unpunished? Or do you mean the type of matriarchy where 9-11% of girls are married off as minors? Also that matriarchy must have developed pretty fast, considering that only 50 years ago women weren’t allowed to open their own bank accounts. It’s also pretty impressive that we managed to develop a matriarchy where the majority of powerful people are all men, and where several of our most recent (male) presidents have…	/r/MensRights	06/05/22 07:50 AM
-5	it was worse being a man than a woman in the 1900s Damn I didn’t know “never getting things done” now means completely revolutionizing the way women are treated in society and gaining rights for women, from the right to vote to the right to open up their own bank account, in an impressively short time frame. Yes, we should focus on ways to improve both sides. This sub does not do that; instead it’s filled with whataboutism and “actually feminism is bad and here’s why”. That’s why subs like r/menslib are so much better for proponents of men’s rig…	/r/MensRights	06/05/22 07:37 AM
-14	it was worse being a man than a woman in the 1900s Ah yes, the type of matriarchy where men are the predominant members & make up the majority of rulers and billionaires/millionaires. Of course.	/r/MensRights	06/05/22 07:25 AM
-34	it was worse being a man than a woman in the 1900s How dare you suggest the patriarchy exists! On this sub, we complain about things without acknowledging the root cause or doing anything to fix them! Also wahmen have it too good smh (let's forget legalized marital rape, the fact that women were so depressed and stressed that they had to be drugged, the fact that women were considered more property than people and had no way to control their own lives outside of marriage or their fathers, or that women could literally be lobotomized for not conf…	/r/MensRights	06/05/22 04:57 AM
0	False equivalence on the left because men are worth less. Jesus christ okay you're just delusional if you think that people forced to pay child support are more harmed than people forced to be incubators. In that case, I suppose everyone who pays child support would immediately opt for being hooked up to a blood transfusion device for their child for nine months instead. Do you see how absolutely stupid your logic sounds now? I'm done with this bullshit. Arguing with this level of idiocy and willfull ignorance is just exhausting. I just hope you're a t…	/r/MensRights	04/05/22 10:42 PM
-1	False equivalence on the left because men are worth less. Worldwide, obviously. We're talking about how insanely risky pregnancy is. But if you want to pretend like the US is the only place where it matters (it isn't), then 800 women die per year, which the highest pregnancy mortality rates compared to other developed nations, and bad enough to be regularly monitored and discussed as a severe issue in the US. But this isn't even touching on the fact that you straight up had no response or rebuttal to any of my other questions? You know why? Because chi…	/r/MensRights	04/05/22 06:26 PM
-1	False equivalence on the left because men are worth less. “Probably many”—oh? Do you have an estimate? Because 800 women die every day in childbirth. All those question marks just show how little you actually know about what women go through for pregnancy. Before trying to compare and belittle their experiences, maybe you should do some actual research into them. Again, would love to hear any sort of elaboration on the weak ass responses of “probably many” and “many”. Because the fact that you can’t even give good examples shows how obviously different…	/r/MensRights	04/05/22 05:09 PM
-2	False equivalence on the left because men are worth less. Lmao would love a source for “men die from child support”. Also, you address none of my other points. And it’s hilarious that, in order to make child support seem worse than pregnancy, you had to remove literally every aspect of each other than time. You straight up just weaken your own point with that.	/r/MensRights	04/05/22 10:42 AM
-2	False equivalence on the left because men are worth less. Oh my god, by your own logic no they are not. “Paper abortion” is nowhere near equivalent to an abortion and you know it. Child support does not demand that you relinquish your own body to months worth of pain, complications, invasive medical procedures, permanent change, and threat of death. You know that’s not the same. If you can’t compare FGM and MGM, you definitely can’t compare forced pregnancy and child support. How many men die from paying child support? How many of them have foreign obj…	/r/MensRights	04/05/22 10:25 AM
-15	False equivalence on the left because men are worth less. We're not talking about genital mutilation specifically -- we're talking about all medical procedures forced upon different demographics. I never argued that male genital mutilation isn't an issue. I argued that it's absolutely fucking insane to say men are the ONLY people who know what it's like to have their bodily autonomy threatened. Being forced to give birth is a forced medical procedure. Birth involves medical procedures. It is insanely disingenuous to describe forced pregnancy as "not be…	/r/MensRights	04/05/22 07:30 AM
-17	False equivalence on the left because men are worth less. In one case you are imposing a medical procedure against someone's will, in another you are withholding a medical procedure from someone on ethical grounds. They aren't the same. What, pregnancy doesn't involve necessary medical procedures now??? Men are the only people in the US who know what it's like? At that point you are being purposefully ignorant. Plenty of demographics have their bodily autonomy threatened by current laws and politics.	/r/MensRights	04/05/22 04:26 AM
-26	False equivalence on the left because men are worth less. The tweet is literally meant to sound bad. It’s supposed to point out regulating ANY body is bad. That to think forcing women through pregnancy is ok logically means you should think this is ok too—when neither is ok. Nobody’s advocating for forced sterilization; you just need to learn basic reading comprehension.	/r/MensRights	04/05/22 03:20 AM
1	Just found this sub and I want to say I'm so proud of all of you I mean that just sounds like a good reason to try socializing with women in order to get some positive influences.	/r/ExRedPill	02/05/22 12:09 AM
3	Just found this sub and I want to say I'm so proud of all of you Considering "black pill" is straight up a cult that encourages suicidal tendencies and is obsessed with wringing any happiness or positive emotions/experiences out of anyone involved, no, that is so much worse than the red pill ideology. You're allowed to be happy, to not be addicted to sadness. I know it's easier to convince yourself life is hopeless than it is to face the fact that you have to work hard in order to save yourself from your own mind. Anyone who tells you life isn't worth living …	/r/ExRedPill	01/05/22 09:46 PM
5	Is 4 bodies a lot for a 19 year old Girl? I mean practicing safe sex / regular testing should solve that situation, right?	/r/seduction	20/04/22 03:38 AM
2	Is 4 bodies a lot for a 19 year old Girl? Does it matter? What are the negative impacts of “too many” bodies?	/r/seduction	20/04/22 03:28 AM
2	Becomes misandrist, proves the ones who point out misandry are misogynistic on a man hating sub. Incel Lmao I never said men are bad, did I? I love men. Most of my friends are men. I have helped and will continue to help the men I know when they need me, because they are good people and I don’t blindly hate them like you blindly hate women. I smile and say hello to men on the street — it’s weird for you to assume I “blindly hate” them. Like I said, you have a huge persecution fetish if you automatically assume any women who is upset about their treatment in society is attacking men somehow. I quo…	/r/AntiFeminists	13/11/21 04:56 PM
-8	Becomes misandrist, proves the ones who point out misandry are misogynistic on a man hating sub. Incel Someone has a persecution fetish. Honestly it takes skill for you to be this disconnected from reality. (Also, men are more than twice as likely to be assaulted by other men than they are to be assaulted by women. According to the Dept. of Justice, ~91% of rape victims are female, while ~99% of rapists are male.)	/r/AntiFeminists	12/11/21 08:57 PM
3	"Dont be friends with girls" THANK YOU. What the actual fuck is OP spewing. Women are people, not assets. This post is straight up sociopathic reasoning.	/r/seduction	01/08/21 03:06 AM
5	On Female Friends- It's good to have them The problem with that kind of thinking is that if you treat them like they're overly sensitive and weak, they'll act overly sensitive and weak, because they know they can get away with it. It's like children: if you baby them, they'll keep acting babyish. In fact if you treat them the same way you'd treat a guy you'd be surprised at how much they'll act like one. Of course that doesn't change physical things. Like you said, you shouldn't be expecting them to be able to perform the same physical …	/r/TheRedPill	29/07/17 07:24 PM