TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

JuranoCK Archive

View 3 posts and 20 comments by JuranoCK on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

he's still a good poster...even though i agree with a lot of what you say in terms of what women say not translating into how they act most of the time. ​ how is numbers of partners any better? asking women number of partners they will still lie
/r/BlackPillScience07/04/19 10:58 AM
1

get bulking bro, gymmaxing is legit af
/r/BlackPillScience23/03/19 12:02 PM
1

yeah some good points. also note it is sexually dimorphic for men to be bigger than women so that could play a part too. having skinny arms/legs is a huge turn off to women
/r/BlackPillScience23/03/19 09:47 AM
1

point to note that the study found a weak correlation between BMI and age for men (r = .13) so that could play a part. obviously the older you are, the more likely you are to have more sex partners. either way, it's a very weak correlation and not enough to completely explain the trends present in the graph. i don't find it surprising that women would prefer a fat man over a skinny man imo
/r/BlackPillScience23/03/19 09:28 AM
2

https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Body-mass-index-BMI-and-mean-sex-partner-number-for-heterosexual-men-and-women-Means_fig2_283199925 ​ this is the sex partner count vs BMI graph in the same study
/r/BlackPillScience23/03/19 08:13 AM
5

an outlier BMI is actually a far better predictor of sex partner count compared to height
/r/BlackPillScience22/03/19 03:20 AM
1

by saying it might largely be explained is jumping to conclusions. you obviously have no idea what's going on or didn't read any of the studies. ​ in the eye color studies for example, they changed the eye color on the same model meaning they tested for contrast but found no difference in rated attractiveness. ​ Doesn't it seem more reliable to look at revealed preferences rather than preferences stated in an experiment/questionnaire. The latter might more likely suffer from social desirability …
/r/BlackPillScience13/03/19 01:11 AM
0

Your link has nothing to do with attractiveness and i'm more inclined to listen to the data i linked as opposed to OkCupid data. I think you're jumping to conclusions far too quickly. Even though contrast might be nice to look at from an aesthetic perspective it might not translate to sex appeal.
/r/BlackPillScience10/03/19 11:33 PM
1

thank you very much for this do you have the study link? i don't understand your analysis though. it seems that 0 additional income on top of baseline income is needed for attractiveness only when men are in the 10th decile (rated a 10) but for height as soon as a man is over 5'11.5 he gets to earn less than the baseline income. this sort of proves that height is more important but this seems to be more in reference to long term relationships while i was asking more in reference to short term re…
/r/BlackPillScience10/03/19 03:00 PM
1

thank you. seems to be a very controversial topic
/r/BlackPillScience10/03/19 02:40 AM
0

if i want to post here i need to familiarize myself with all the other posts? that's ridiculous. i live in a white country (Australia) and from what i have seen most women prefer guys with dark features and this is clearly confirmed by the evidence, i don't see how you can say that nothing i posted is valuable. tough pill to swallow
/r/BlackPillScience10/03/19 01:36 AM
2

can you stop being vague and actually give a good explanation?
/r/BlackPillScience10/03/19 01:14 AM
1

i think there are inconsistencies between the studies/surveys but what is important is that the general patten shows that darker hair comes out on top while blonde/ginger comes out on the bottom.
/r/BlackPillScience10/03/19 01:07 AM
2

why is that TrannyPornO?
/r/BlackPillScience10/03/19 01:06 AM
3

i already mentioned that preferences will probably vary across races and that the information i posted was in regards to white women.
/r/BlackPillScience09/03/19 03:27 PM
1

cope
/r/BlackPillScience09/03/19 03:25 PM
6

i mentioned that this is in regards to white womens preferences and that i'm sure preference will vary across races
/r/BlackPillScience09/03/19 01:28 PM
13

i think you need to leave the basement and stop basing everything off movies. are you saying all the evidence i posted is wrong? i don't get it?
/r/BlackPillScience09/03/19 11:31 AM
15

I really disagree, the phrase is tall, dark and handsome for a reason and this is proven by the evidence.
/r/BlackPillScience09/03/19 11:22 AM
3

what iketoure said. ​ this extract from the article might also be interesting to you, as skin tone is sexually dimorphic within each race: the skin of white women was 15.2 per cent lighter than the skin of white males, and the skin of black women 11.1 per cent lighter than the skin of black men. I also added another source under "skin".
/r/BlackPillScience09/03/19 11:19 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter