TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Just4pornpls Archive

View 0 posts and 7 comments by Just4pornpls on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

“The penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim.”
/r/PussyPassDenied17/12/21 04:19 PM
4

In the United States its not expressly penis in vagina. It's expressly penetration of any kind. Which is basically the same thing
/r/PussyPassDenied17/12/21 12:54 PM
-14

Oh I was being facetious. Sorry I didn't make that clearer. Sarcasm over text is hard. I just think the logic that women shouldn't be in the armed services because they're usually not as strong/fast. Is super limited in scope and sells what it means to be a soldier incredibly short. I think the flawed logic of that argument can very quickly be expanded to: let's just Captain America everyone.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/03/21 06:06 AM
-1

That's usually how the EEOC would handle something like this. For civilian jobs at least, they have interviews for the staff currently in the position to develop a list of requirements. Get the description from a group and you're less likely to see people tweaking it to support a bias.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/03/21 01:03 AM
-51

I mean I think that is the logical outcome of this argument. If being able to do the most pull-ups makes you the best soldier then we should be doping all of our soldiers. Someone further up made the argument of not feeling safe with a female squad mate because she couldn't carry him out. Aka: stronger = better Get a guy on roids and he could carry out the whole squad if they went down.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/03/21 12:40 AM
-10

A common tactic for jobs intending to exclude minorities and women is to introduce job requirements that aren't actually necessary to complete the job satisfactorily but serve instead to weed out undesirables. Usually this takes the form of demanding a job needs a BA or specific certification when really a GED is perfectly fine, but hiking physical requirements would fit the bill as well. It's the EEOC'S job to stop it when it happens. So if the requirements were changed, odds are they were show…
/r/PussyPassDenied11/03/21 12:32 AM
11

Unfortunately it is. We had a male high school student below the age of consent assaulted by a female guidance counselor where I'm from and all of the comments on the news articles were: "Ha ha, nice." "where were these teachers when I was a kid?" and other bullshit. I think the problem is the argument of "legitimate" rape. Some people only see it as "real rape" when it's a male perpetrator and female victim and there's clearly visible physical trauma. If the crime doesn't fit their TV show expe…
/r/AntiFeminists24/11/20 05:14 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter