TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

JustChillin3342 Archive

View 0 posts and 71 comments by JustChillin3342 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I was going to disagree with you based on the title, but the explanation makes sense. The only thing to me is a single man acts differently from a man in a relationship which tends to draw people to him and creates more opportunities but I don’t think that increase is on the same level as what women experience. But I would also say because men aren’t used to having so many options, when the opportunity does present itself, it’s much harder to resist.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/26 05:49 PM
–

What about that was confusing?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/26 12:27 AM
–

I definitely don't think women have it better than men, but I also don't think men have it better than women either. And feminism has done a lot of things for men, and I think feminists/left groups do recognize that there is a problem that men have, but the solutions that they have aren't what most men have in mind. At the moment I'd say that most men don't have a basic human need fulfilled. It's easy for women to fulfill this need because there isn't as much stigma around it for them. Most men …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 03:13 PM
1

It did, and the rise of standards of living was a reaction to the black death, while the decline of feudalism was a result of the of labor shortages that completely changed the economic landscape and ended feudalism.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/26 06:07 AM
1

Both statments are true and are driving the decline in birthrates.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/26 05:54 AM
1

It's literally a 2 second google search... You could have done it yourself instead of wasting my time. If someone puts just a little bit of time into doing reasearch into the things they comment about, they would have way more productive conversations.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 02:53 PM
1

https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/science.1080444 "In the anoxic Cariaco Basin of the southern Caribbean, the bulk titanium content of undisturbed sediment reflects variations in riverine input and the hydrological cycle over northern tropical South America. A seasonally resolved record of titanium shows that the collapse of Maya civilization in the Terminal Classic Period occurred during an extended regional dry period, punctuated by more intense multiyear droughts centered at approximate…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 02:47 PM
1

I don't know what you're asking for a source for. That drought contributed to the fall of the Mayan emprie? Or that humans got disconnected during the ice age? Those things I learned in school so I don't have sources for those, but a google search will prob turn up something.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 02:42 PM
1

Define climate.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 02:19 PM
1

Define climate change.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 02:16 PM
1

Historically meaning when? Things like this didn’t really get well documented until like 100 years ago. But even still there’s proof that changes in climate do harm people. The Mayan empire is an example. Or when humans got disconnected from the rest of the population during the ice age. Human civilization is mostly built in a period of stable climate. So when there’s changes in it, it hits hard.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 02:07 PM
1

Yes we do. There’s tons of proof that it does and there’s tons of proof that it’s linked to human activity. Extreme weather events is an example.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 01:58 PM
1

Yes it has, and there’s a ton of proof. And it’s a problem now because climate shifts are happening much quicker than they usually do because of human intervention.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 01:41 PM
1

That’s random, but also, climate change hurts people all the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 01:30 PM
2

That's only half the problem. The actual problem is that society as a whole isn't taught/doesn't learn how to respect or enforce their own boundaries or the boundaries of others. And aren't taught how to communicate them in a productive way.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 12:29 AM
–

I feel like it might be the exact opposite but ultimately it comes down to who we have as a leader to make those decisions.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 12:07 AM
2

Where was the decline of population ever said to be the end of the world? He said that a decline in population CAN crash an economy, not that it WILL.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 11:24 PM
3

Then what are you saying? You said alot of educated people would agree with you. Agree with you on what exactly? I'm not strawmanning you, I'm genuinly trying to understand what you believe will happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 11:20 PM
3

So do you believe that the decrease in birth rates will have absolutely no effects?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 11:13 PM
1

And he proved the point, you rejected it. It's your time to tell us, why his argument is wrong and yours is right.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 11:05 PM
4

Did the World Wars or COVID 19 destroy the US? No. Did the transition hurt? Yes. Did the population shift destroy Japan? No. Did the transition hurt? Yes. Will declining birthrates destroy all of humanity? Most likely not. Will it hurt alot of people? Yes. There's your answer. Idk who the yall you're talking about but no one here is saying that there will be a doomsday level event, it's just going to really suck.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 11:02 PM
1

Well if he isn't telling the truth, disprove his point?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 10:58 PM
1

Yes you are, you're claim was that the information stated above was false. Where is your proof that it is false?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 10:47 PM
3

You convienently skipped over the fact that Japan’s national debt-to-GDP ratio sits at over 204% - by far the highest in the developed world because of the birthrate issue. Entitlements programs(pensions, national healthcare, and social safety nets) don't drop off whenever birthrates do. https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/GGXWDG_NGDP@WEO/JPN
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 10:42 PM
0

Provide citations and data that support your point because literally the majority of people would agree that this is a problem lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 10:37 PM
4

You aren't accounting for the fact that the average human is using more resources then they did 100 or 200 years ago. And you're completely missing the fact that with declining birth rates too, you'll have a higher percentage off the population that cannot work(because they are too old) then those who are young enough to work. So will be understaffed when it come to caring for the elderly(AKA the people living today). Also fixed Infrastructure doesn't just scale down linearly. I'm on the side th…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 10:33 PM
0

When the US population was half of what is was now, we also didn't have as much of a demand as we do today. The US relies heavily on immigration to increase population an fill gaps in the job market. Again you answered your own question, and proved yourself wrong by looking at what happens to the economy whenever there's a lose in population from wars or disease.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 10:21 PM
4

It's never happened, because the world has never experianced something like this before but the point is war and disease gives us an idea of what could happen. War, and disease lowers populations. Lower birthrates also lower populations. Jobs are worked by people. Less people mean less jobs. Less jobs mean less productivity, less productivity means less stuff. And stuff includes resources and services which are things that drive an economy.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 10:15 PM
–

In all honesty, I don't see declining birth rates as being a problem and actually puts us in a better spot because of the creation of AI. I'm thinking AI will make humans as a whole more productive so the offset of productivity caused by a shortage of workforce will be regained from the use of AI.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 09:45 PM
0

You just answered your own question lol. Has a decline in population ever crashed an economy? Now you know what happens when birthrates decline.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 09:37 PM
1

He's wrong for not taking what she said at face value, even if her no means yes, he's supposed to treat the no as a no but I don't think most guys understand that's what you're supposed to do that. And part of the reason why they don't understand that's what they are supposed to do is because women don't disengage whenever it happens and that enables men to just keep doing it. The guy who's coercing the heck out of her and stepping all over her boundaries, she's still staying with him because he…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 08:52 PM
2

It was wrong of him to push it whenever she said no, but it's also on her for saying yes after she was pressured. Part of the thing is not all men understand the subtle queues that women give, and whenever a women says no, she doesn't always really mean no. Or whenever she says yes, she doesn't always mean yes. Alot of men are confused by that. That miscommunication is part of the problem. Vocal communication is clear and to the point. I'm not saying I disagree with you with with everything else…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 06:37 PM
2

Tell him never to ask again and if he does make a scene out of it. Men need to learn to respect people’s boundaries. But women also need to learn to express themselves and take action to enforce those boundaries. If you make a scene out of it he’ll stop unless he’s crazy.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 04:08 PM
2

How was he able to ask her 9 times if she wasn’t still around him? If she cut communications with him when she felt the boundary was crossed, it wouldnt have gotten to the “Yes”. But I agree with you with everything else. A man shouldn’t be asking to that point. And not having sex is an expected outcome.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 01:59 PM
3

What do you expect me to do about that? Every individual has a responsibility to protect themselves. It’s wrong for him to have asked 10 times, but the end of the day she said yes. From a societal prospective, men need to change in the way that they need to stop pushing boundaries but part of the reason they keep pushing boundaries is because they can’t understand a women’s communication style. Giving a man unfavorable results when he tries to push boundaries makes it clear, and would actually l…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 01:44 PM
1

I didn’t buy into it, I left. I stopped talking to her. I’m lonely and touch starved, but it’s better than the alternative(and on that regard OP is right that sex doesn’t need to be an outcome). And that’s the mindset women should have. If a man asks for sex, when you already said no, there’s no reason to keep talking to him. Because by talking to him, you’re doing the same thing by enabling him to ask a question you already answered. You’re allowing that person to push the boundary. When you ca…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 01:28 PM
1

With the guy asking her for sex. Why not remove them from her life whenever the boundary was crossed?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 06:06 AM
2

Like he is wrong for trying to push the boundary, but women are also confusing and don't openly say what they want but instead rely on subtle queues that men can't understand or easily gives men mixed signals so that they can manipulate a situation in their favor later(not saying everyone does that, but it's honestly like the male version of the man vs bear dilemma). And sometimes, no means yes, and yes means no. And honestly, at this point I'm honestly not 100% convinced that women don't want t…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 04:47 AM
2

Idk, but why did she stay till 9?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 02:46 AM
3

Why is she with him past the 3rd no? Just leave the situation if he’s pushing a boundary.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 02:44 AM
7

If she said no 9 times and said yes on the 10th time, it’s a yes. If she says yes 9 times and no the 10th time, it’s a no.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 09:52 PM
1

For point 4. I’m glad I’m not the only one. The only thing that goes through my mind when I don’t know what someone wants is to not catching a case, where they say that I touched them in a way that made them uncomfortable so I don’t initiate unless I went over a scenario with them(which I’ve never actually tried because I’m voluntarily celibate now) I was never taught about consent or how intimacy worked outside of porn so idk what to do. One person was trying to teach me how this kind of thing …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/26 10:35 PM
6

Hell yeah
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/26 04:08 PM
52

God I’m glad I’m single lol
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/26 02:49 PM
1

But even the utility part idk if it’s even true either… I think it’s partly true. But I think there’s a place where relationships are built from friendships and then layered upon.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 04:00 AM
1

I feel to some extent this is semi true but more nuanced. I’ve let women who I’ve loved go, because they didn’t feel the same way or because I don’t think we would have been a good fit. Doesn’t mean I don’t still care for them even if some of them interpreted it that way(because I kinda suck at communicating). There’s only one woman that I’ve been around that wrong me really bad that I feel a bit indifferent about but no malice. I think it was just a learning lesson for me. At the same time, I d…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 03:56 AM
1

I already said my piece. No amount of reasoning will make you think differently so I'm done wasting my time.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 11:15 PM
1

That's the equivalent of saying: 'The housing market isn't a problem! People just love living with mom and dad.' If you can't afford a house, you stop making it a priority to save your sanity. If you can't afford dating—whether emotionally, materially, or otherwise—you stop making it a priority, too. The only people in that study confirmed to be without a problem are the ones who selected 'Just like being single,' because they are genuinely content. The rest are dealing with a dating problem by …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 09:37 PM
1

I'm not throwing it away. I don't think you intepreted the data correctly. I could also fall into that catagory of "Having other priorities". They need to get their money up because intimacy is a luxery item now.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 08:25 PM
2

Having other priorities doesn't mean being content being single.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 08:17 PM
1

Can therapy replace human connection, a romantic partner, or a supportive community? I wouldn't be here right now if I didn't have family and friends. Not everyone is that lucky, or they end up around the wrong people and things get worse. You said earlier that if a guy is isolated, it must be because 'literally everyone in his adult life hates him.' That is a wild misreading of modern isolation. Millions of guys aren't hated—they are invisible. They go to work, they are polite, they try their b…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 07:42 PM
2

I'm one of them, because I gave up. And that's the reality for many other men out there too.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 07:22 PM
1

Think about the traditional 'protector' role. We usually think of men protecting physically or financially. But women protect too, just differently. Men heavily rely on women to be the protectors of their emotional well-being—because society doesn't allow men to be vulnerable anywhere else without penalizing them. With that in mind, look at your own worldview. When a guy is drowning in isolation, struggling to navigate dating, and he opens up, your immediate response is to call him a 'spoiled li…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 07:12 PM
2

The "suffer in silence" trope isn't a choice; it's a survival mechanism. Men frequently report that when they do open up or show vulnerability, they face immediate social penalties—peers view them as weak, and romantic partners often lose attraction. This leads to a profound, crushing sense of loneliness where a man feels he has to carry every burden entirely alone. On apps like Tinder or Hinge, the gender ratio is heavily skewed (often 70-80% male). Algorithms and swiping dynamics mean the vast…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 07:03 PM
1

That is incorrect. Most men do struggle with dating. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/02/08/for-valentines-day-5-facts-about-single-americans/ https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-state-of-our-unions/202302/why-are-so-many-young-men-single-and-sexless#:\~:text=A%20recent%20Pew%20Research%20study,in%20the%20same%20age%20bracket.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 06:49 PM
2

You’re spot on that coddling creates entitled adults who can't handle reality. But I think you're misdiagnosing the root cause for most men. The vast majority of guys aren't suffering from 'too much mommy validation'—they are suffering from absolute social isolation. Girls are taught how to build social webs because their standing depends on it. Boys aren't 'exempt' from pressure; they are taught that their value is purely conditional on what they can provide or achieve. If a girl struggles soci…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 06:40 PM
0

“Girls are pressured to take care more about their social standing and to fit in.” Gay and queer men must have a real easy time fitting in then huh?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 04:38 PM
1

Well I think someone had a better example than mine. If a guy gave his ex head but doesn’t give his current gf head. I would agree that it isn’t better treatment if it isn’t something that they wanted, but if it is something that they did want then I would say that’s better treatment.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/26 02:19 PM
0

Well that’s your opinion and you are entitled to your opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/26 02:12 PM
3

That’s fair. And yeah that is the better question.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/26 02:08 PM
3

Good, I’m glad you’re at least consistent with your replies. The reason I put it that way is because men and women have a different relationship with sex. We are comparing trust here. I think women value safety and security more than they value sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/26 02:08 PM
-1

Just answer the question and I’ll get to my point. You’re taking my question out of context.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/26 02:00 PM
-3

Please just answer the question. I think you not having the context behind why I’m asking the question will create less bias in your response.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/26 01:50 PM
-1

If a man gives his ex access to his finances(money, credit cards, bank accounts a combination of those or one of those options), but not his current partner. What would/should the current partner feel?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/26 01:21 PM
1

I agree with this, but with the caviot is that men have a toxic view of confidence. I don't know if this is from my experiance alone, but growing up, confidence took the form of: Action is better than inaction, It's better to say sorry then to ask for permission and even if you're wrong, don't let other people know that you are wrong. In the context of when it comes to boundaries and consent, the way that men have learned confidence have also lead them to overstep boundaries, and to ignore conse…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/26 04:38 AM
1

They should… but for one thing, that’s sometimes not actually enough. But more broadly, you’re expecting people to read minds and have perfect social evaluation of others and understand subtle pre-indications as though rape and abuse are really the victim’s fault. In your argument, if only people were just vigilant enough about subtle boundary pushing, then that’s how to prevent rape… as if it is even possible to control the actions of others until they obey your boundaries. I wouldn’t consider …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/26 07:14 PM
1

Agree. But in this conversation, we are talking about it from the point of view of the person pushing the boundaries, not the person with the boundaries. Yes the person with boundaries should run the fuck away or use violence (even deadly violence!) to defend themselves if they need to… but sometimes that’s not something they’re able to do. And they are not somehow evil or in the wrong or a failure or at fault for simply not succeeding in defending themselves. Well perhaps this was just a social…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/26 01:45 PM
1

The breaking of boundaries is how it starts, and then rape is how it ends there’s a bit of things that happens before it gets to that point. Like if a guy doesn’t respect your boundaries before sex, it should be a clear indicator that he won’t respect them during it or after it. We are having this conversation in the context of sex but when I talk about boundaries, I’m doing so more generally. If a guy doesn’t respect your boundaries that you’ve communicated with him no matter what they are or h…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/26 12:17 AM
0

Enforcement means leaving whenever a communicated boundary has been crossed. Or even at a boundary that’s past an absolute limit. I mentioned the butt stuff in the context of it being something that I enjoyed. Because it’s something I do not enjoy, my answer is I’d stay and wouldn’t care and thus I wouldn’t care for the test either. If it were something that I did enjoy that I’d ask as a curiosity more than anything else. Asking about the level of consent shouldn’t be seen as pressing a boundary…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 02:29 PM
0

I’m just going to say the quiet part out loud.. If you don’t enforce a boundary, it’s not a boundary, it’s just a suggestion. If she said she had anal once and didn’t like it and never did it again, that would be a different story then that’s just a no go situation but if she continued because he had a micropenis then you’re just moving the boundary. If you’re going to have boundaries, then those boundaries should be consistent or else it’s not a real boundary. Why would it change just because h…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 03:37 AM
2

In this exact situation. I’d stay and wouldn’t care. If you didn’t explain the reasoning behind it, I would be wondering why it was ok with him but not for me. Since you explained the reasoning, I’d understand. But I feel like I am a bit biased in that I don’t like butt stuff. If it were something that I really enjoyed/wanted, it would kinda depend on how much I liked you. If you didn’t explain the reasoning behind it/if the reason wasn’t as good then I’d prob leave. But also I’d be curious how …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/26 09:42 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter