TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

JustOneWorm Archive

View 0 posts and 33 comments by JustOneWorm on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Keep in mind that when we talk about equality, we can imagine it as a set of scales. If you have piles of rocks in both scales and you're trying to even them out, you have to be very careful about how many rocks you move. Otherwise, you end up tipping the scales too far in the other direction and then we're right back where we started. I think that's the point we're at now in regards to feminism and equality. Feminism has achieved most of the meaningful things they set out to achieve, now we're …
/r/MensRights24/02/15 02:19 AM
1

I'm not the person you responded to, but I'm more than happy to respond. I think the position of most reasonable MRA's (including me) is that women and men both face challenges in different ways. In some ways, women have advantages. Men may have some as well. I think the reason some MRA's (me included) sound "anti-feminist" is that in many cases, feminism is the source of male plight or they take stances or push for legislation that hurts men and boys. It's not okay to push one person's head und…
/r/MensRights24/02/15 02:15 AM
4

You mean like NOW, the largest feminist organization on the planet? The one that opposes alimony reform here in the U.S. every single time it comes up? Uh huh. You clearly know what you are talking about. /s
/r/MensRights24/02/15 01:45 AM
–

NOW (National Organization for Women), the largest feminist organization on the planet, regularly opposes alimony reform legislation. So yes...those same feminists.
/r/MensRights24/02/15 01:43 AM
–

NOW, the largest feminst organization in the world, regularly opposes legislation that attempts to make alimony more fair and reasonable. That's why on an issue like this we see it as a defeat of feminism.
/r/MensRights24/02/15 01:38 AM
1

Also, I am not religious. Morals do not come from religion.
/r/MensRights23/02/15 10:48 PM
1

They are immoral. They helped cause other humans tremendous pain and suffering. That sums it up. They are obligated if they want to be moral.
/r/MensRights23/02/15 10:42 PM
1

NOT THE OBLIGATION for the sister It's the moral obligation of anyone who knows the truth to tell it, which I've already explained three times now. Because it involves a child, mostly, but also the emotions and financial well-being of other human beings. Any person who has information like this and chooses to conceal it is an immoral asshole. Period. It's like the bystander effect. Five people in my situation knew she cheated on me, and NONE of them thought it was "their place".
/r/MensRights23/02/15 10:18 PM
8

who you think should be paying the money the dad doesn't pay? The mother. She should fund her own reproductive choice. I agree with you that conservatives make abortion access very difficult for some women living in poverty and we should address that. But by that same token, we shouldn't be forcing men to be parents if they don't want to be. Women get a choice, men should too.
/r/MensRights23/02/15 09:52 PM
2

The article stated that she had unprotected sex with BOTH men on the same day. Again, of course it's not proven yet. The baby isn't born. But the POSSIBILITY that the child isn't the boyfriends already exists, and he should be made aware of it. I'm not sure why you can't get this through your thick skull, but I'm done trying. If you don't tell the boyfriend, perhaps paternity is never questioned! You really need to join the rest of us here in reality. If the boyfriend wants to stay around after …
/r/MensRights23/02/15 09:19 PM
1

but I don't think they're trying to make anyone the bad guy. Then you didn't read their position very closely and you completely ignored my quotation of them. Because their position absolutely demonizes men. The biggest issue for feminism right now, in my opinion, is paid parental leave time. Not maternal leave, parental. They are trying to ensure that both fathers AND mothers are able to bond with their children after birth. And yet, I haven't seen a single ad regarding parental leave time. HOW…
/r/MensRights23/02/15 09:08 PM
1

IF IT WERE PROVEN It doesn't matter. Unless the pregnant girl tells the boyfriend, it's still fraud. Do you understand what fraud means? Apparently not. Let me explain it for you, since you aren't as smart as you seem to think you are. There are TWO types of fraud: 1) Making a statement as though it were true when the statement is false. 2) Making a statement as though it were true when you don't know whether the statement is true or false. Paternity fraud falls under the second premise. A woman…
/r/MensRights23/02/15 08:53 PM
1

I tried arguing with this person too, their arguments are ridiculous. You should read their responses to me, they're...enlightening.
/r/MensRights23/02/15 08:51 PM
1

You're young, and idealistic. No, I'm 36 and I know right from wrong. You don't, apparently. You should work on that. Perhaps the pregnant girl and her boyfriend are polyamorous, and the non-pregnant sister doesn't know that this situation is something they are a part of Still not as bad as letting a man raise a child for a few years only to find out later the kid isn't his. In one scenario, someone is harmed significantly. Maybe just the father, but also possibly the child depending on the age.…
/r/MensRights23/02/15 08:48 PM
1

They aren't trying to paint men as the bad guy They absolutely are. Let me quote from the NOW stance on it: "Increased father involvement does not necessarily result in positive outcomes for children. This involvement by the father will have positive consequences only when it is the arrangement of choice for the particular family and when there is a relatively cooperative and low conflict relationship between the parents." Notice how that's a gendered statement? Also: "Legislation providing for …
/r/MensRights23/02/15 08:30 PM
2

Their position is absurd. Again, unless there's a good reason 50/50 is a perfectly reasonable starting point. Now, obviously either parent is free to relinquish any amount of visitation they want. But 50/50 should be the starting point, unless there's a good reason. Abuse, etc. But courts already consider that. They even state that ABUSE is a reason we shouldn't default to shared custody. The sole purpose of them even mentioning that is to paint men as the bad guy. Courts already consider abuse.…
/r/MensRights23/02/15 07:44 PM
1

What reason could their possibly be to not inform the person? I can't think of a single reason that makes not telling a better option than telling from am oral perspective.
/r/MensRights23/02/15 07:40 PM
2

There's a difference between "high up" MRM's and feminism, though. Feminism is a massive organization with tons of funding behind it. They are influencing legislation, spending millions of dollars on nationwide campaigns, etc. Go ahead and point to one piece of legislation that MRM's are responsible for that hurts women. Point to just one massive nationwide campaign backed by millions of dollars that MRM's are responsible for. You can't, because they don't exist. And that's the difference. Their…
/r/MensRights23/02/15 06:45 PM
1

Anyone who knows should speak up. It's the moral thing to do. I raised a child for 3 years that I later found out was not mine. Obviously lost any right to the child and ended up suing my ex. All of her friends knew she cheated but none of them felt it was "their place" to tell me. When a child is involved you do the right thing. Not just for the child, but for another human being. Losing a child is the most painful and devastating experience anyone could go through, and I barely made it through…
/r/MensRights23/02/15 06:42 PM
1

There's a difference between a legal obligation and a moral one. When it involves a child like this, I would argue there's a moral obligation. As a guy who raised a child who wasn't his for almost 3 years, it almost devastated me to the point of no return. I sued my ex for paternity fraud and won. So yes, from a moral perspective, I think someone is obligated to speak up.
/r/MensRights23/02/15 05:25 PM
3

I'm not saying that every person who identifies as a feminist is a bad person. However, it's obvious that the movement as a whole is a net-negative for society, and especially for men in society. I judge a movement by the fruits of its labor. I don't care what individual feminists say they believe. I care what the movement actually achieves, and the legislation they support or oppose. Viewed through that lens, it's obvious that feminism is toxic. So you can't really say "radical feminism has giv…
/r/MensRights23/02/15 05:17 PM
2

The dictionary definition of a word like feminism is not only irrelevant, but not very reliable. The definition of an object is easy, something like the word "fork". It's not ambiguous, we can both agree on what a fork is. But since dictionaries rely on popular usage for their definitions, it simply means that's how feminism is popularly defined. That doesn't make the definition accurate, and based on the facts, we know it's not accurate. Also, feminism doesn't work toward equality for men. Not …
/r/MensRights23/02/15 05:16 PM
2

Obviously I meant it doesn't matter who the aggressor is providing it wasn't forcible rape, and I think you know that. Forcible rape is a different crime, we were talking about statutory rape. You understand the difference, right?
/r/MensRights20/02/15 10:46 AM
5

We already have that, that's the whole point of statutory rape. The penalties are generally lighter than the penalties for forcible rape, are they not? Maybe I'm wrong, I don't know.
/r/MensRights20/02/15 12:38 AM
1

Exactly, which is exactly why we have the term "statutory" rape.
/r/MensRights20/02/15 12:37 AM
3

Well, I think we could argue it's unethical but legal. They are two different things. But certainly claiming that teenage boys who cannot legally consent are the aggressors and therefore responsible for their own rape is unethical or even immoral...but that strategy as a defense is clearly legal.
/r/MensRights20/02/15 12:33 AM
3

Ah yes, thanks for the clarification and I agree.
/r/MensRights19/02/15 05:56 PM
71

It doesn't matter who the aggressor is in either situation, as minors cannot consent. The adult is automatically responsible. That's why it's called "statutory" since, even if the minor "consents", it's still rape since they aren't old enough to give consent. Even if they could, there's the issue of a teacher being in a position of power.
/r/MensRights19/02/15 05:34 PM
3

This is exactly what they are doing, great post. Feminists want to tear down the parts of the old social contract that benefited men, while keeping the bits that benefited women in place. The easiest example is NOW fighting against shared parenting legislation and alimony reform. By the way, the author of the Vox article can suck my dick. What a load of shit he wrote, laced with sarcasm and dripping with condescension.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 09:29 PM
1

True, but man, Ban Bossy was pretty ridiculous as well. I mean, they lied about their own data, and anyone with Google could find this out.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 06:02 PM
2

It doesn't matter that they made the language gender neutral, the problem is that if you're trying to get funding through VAWA to open a shelter for men or any such aid for men, you'll be denied. I don't think it's available online anymore, but there used to be documents that people uploaded showing they applied for funding but were denied because the only thing you can get male funding for is "education programs" which means, you're teaching men not to beat women. This was also one of the reaso…
/r/MensRights05/02/15 05:30 PM
1

But we don't need a fundamental unifier. I can't speak for everyone but I know for me, I don't care what individual feminists say they believe. I care what the movement actually achieves. I care about tangible results like the support or opposition to certain legislation, national campaigns backed by millions of dollars, etc. So when I say "feminism" I'm talking about the movement, as a whole, and the fruits of its labor. That doesn't mean I dislike individual feminists, but it does mean I am an…
/r/MensRights05/02/15 04:59 PM
1

The movie Cherrie 2000 (with Melanie Griffith) in the late 80's early 90's actually contained a scene where a man and a woman on a date have an attorney present and are stamping out the terms of their contract to have sex.
/r/MensRights11/12/14 05:15 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter