TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

JustSomeRandomGuy36 Archive

View 0 posts and 187 comments by JustSomeRandomGuy36 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

Why bother trying to tell women this. Everyone knows it's true
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/26 10:02 PM
2

I does make perfect sense in the twisted world we live in where women’s smv is through the roof and men’s smv is in the pits of hell
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/26 08:51 AM
3

I know for a fact this gets 100+ matches on tinder easily. You do not have zero options. Your looksmatch meanwhile roped years ago because he had zero
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/26 08:41 AM
1

I don’t really see how your three points link together. They are all unrelated it seems your main argument about “women’s humanity”. I don’t see how or why men would hate women for showing humanity? What has that got to do with putting women on a pedestal? And Wdym by “this view” what view ? I really don’t understand your points as they should be separate unrelated points
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/26 08:35 AM
1

I am arguing that women also place men on a pedestal. You can’t just make sweeping statements like that
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/26 08:28 AM
1

She’s being treated better than the average man
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/26 08:12 AM
2

Literally the very first paragraph of your post. I am disputing your point that men view women as the ultimate prize to be won. I am saying that women do that just as much as men do. They view some men that way
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/26 08:09 AM
2

Some women do not view some men as the prize? It’s not all one way traffic like that. You’re implying that in every relationship women hold the power as they are the ones to be ‘won’
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/26 07:58 AM
2

Both men and women treat people they’re not attracted to like this. They don’t even consider them as human beings
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/26 07:39 AM
–

The tradition of men paying for dates came from a time when women didn’t work
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 09:47 AM
14

Cringe
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 09:08 PM
12

Straight up gaslighting
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 08:22 PM
5

I’m comparing your earlier comments that all started with “mate” and doesn’t use paraphrasing like with your recent ones which are all structured in paragraphs and even has bold writing lol. Stop denying it
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 08:16 PM
8

So obviously AI
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 08:13 PM
18

No we wouldn’t be blaming the matriarchy in that case, just as we don’t blame the patriarchy for it now. No one is being “taught” to think that way, it’s just human nature that men being emotional signifies weakness
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 07:53 PM
26

If we had a matriarchy, men would still be considered weak by women if they’re emotional. Just as is the case now. It’s got nothing to do with patriarchy
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 07:47 PM
28

Because seeing you cry makes people feel better about themselves and think less of you. It was never about helping men - only taking advantage of them further
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 07:42 PM
–

1000% I agree. As a man
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/26 09:47 AM
–

You're point is that as population density increases, birth rates decrease. This is not true - look at the birth rates of high pop density areas in South Asia and compare those to birth rates in the West. We can observe rather that there is a difference in birth rates between races/ethnicities and also GDP per capita. I agree that the government is importing migrants in response to falling birth rates of native populations, but for reasons you do not address
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/26 02:49 PM
–

Feminism is complete.. women won. Now watch the demographic collapse unfold
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/26 02:41 PM
–

Could you be any less ambigious?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/26 02:36 PM
–

If it is overpopulation, why do we import millions of migrants every year?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/26 02:33 PM
2

nice bait
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 04:29 PM
3

Yes weight is a massive determiner. It also is closely related to youthfulness because being overweight will take away from one's youthful look. But it is not the biggest determiner because an overweight woman in her 20s will have more options than an in-shape woman in her 40s Also yes femininity is a big factor. A woman with shorter hair will probably appear less youthful
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 10:37 AM
6

1000% a woman who is past the wall will still have more options because men are desperate. Women would pay more attention to their youthfulness if they didn't have so many options. They can afford to let themselves go a bit in that sense because they don't have to pay the price. Whereas men cannot afford absolutely anything; if they are balding it's over
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 10:31 AM
8

You said the wall isn’t real and I’m saying it is. Maybe someone benefits from it, maybe not. But the fact is that a young woman who is not prioritising her youthfulness at that age of 23 is not being smart
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 09:36 AM
19

The biggest indicator of attractiveness in a woman is youth. For men, yes it still matters but far far less. The wall is very real but women can avoid it by taking care of their skin, avoiding sun damage, diet, exercise (particularly in the face). I’ve seen some young women in their early 20s who looked 30 and it’s sad. Also this ghoulmaxxing trend with female celebrities isn’t helping, where they get those buccal fat removal surgeries+ozempic. It’s a bad influence on young women who think looki…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 09:33 AM
-2

Red pill and Blue pill are the same
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/26 03:17 PM
–

I have explained this exact point repeatedly and to someone else. We can measure looks through facial analysis to give us ratings based on looks i.e. 5/10 or 6/10. A "looksmatch" implies a man and a woman are both 5/10 or both 6/10. A woman often gets rejected because the man is out of her league in looks (5/10 woman going for a 7/10 man as an example). She does not consider her looksmatch an option. A man often gets rejected because his sexual market value is lower than the woman's despite them…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/26 07:02 PM
–

Not off-topic, you just think that it is
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/26 06:51 PM
–

A valid point that should be addressed. Yes, the market determines value. The point is that a 5/10 woman in looks has a far higher sexual market value in today's dating market than a 5/10 man in looks has
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/26 06:48 PM
–

Attractiveness is not subjective. This is just so exhausting
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/26 06:44 PM
–

Most men are just as delusional as women, trust me. If not more. All these blue pill men here are the examples. The oofy doofy is a pitiful being. They don't recognise the nature of female hypergamy because they are tricked by the mainstream blue pill nonsense that makes them think their looksmatches will be interested in them
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/26 06:43 PM
–

She is not average 5/10. As I said, she is probably a 6/10 absolute max, so not average. The dating market today means that 6/10 women will have men flying out multiple times to meet her, even 7/10 or 8/10 men (she did not say she was getting flown out). That's the reality. Don't get me wrong those "stacies" that you mention are getting flown out by the absolute highest value men above those that are interested in OP
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/26 06:38 PM
–

Because his nose isn't oversized, crooked, asymmetrical and he doesn't have bug eyes (exposed eyelids) unlike her. Zorhan actually has pretty good facial features. Again, she is easily 3/10 and women are trying to convince us that she isn't Remember from that news story, it was his height that made that women reject him on hinge before he became major.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/26 06:31 PM
–

I just fucking explained very simply and clearly
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/26 06:17 PM
–

"touch grass" I love how every blue pill woman instantly resorts to that when they can't face reality
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/26 06:10 PM
–

Go ahead man. Just make sure you are a mayor of a major city first
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/26 06:09 PM
–

No. Someone just asked me the exact same earlier go look at that. TLDR men get rejected by their looksmatch, women get rejected by men above their level (not even considering her looksmatch an option in the first place)
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/26 06:08 PM
–

>No logical man is going to spend that much money on flights just for an “average” woman. Yes he fking is. Trust and believe I know the extent these men go
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/26 06:05 PM
–

No because men get rejected by women they think they can get (their looksmatch) whereas women get rejected by men above their level. If those women approached men on their level, they would have zero problems whatsoever getting accepted
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/26 06:02 PM
–

No I don't. You are probably just 5/10. As I said she's probably a 6/10 so I'm not surprised she has multiple 7/10 guys going after her ( going from what she said) because that's just the reality of the dating market now.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/26 06:00 PM
–

Lol. You are proving my point. Those "ugly broke ass men" are your looksmatch that you refuse to even consider an option. You are the delusional one because you way overrate yourself
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/26 05:56 PM
–

Lol exactly. You are delusional. She is easily a 3/10. Easily. Her eye area and nose alone make her a 3. Not to mention her long horse face and chin. But social media has brainwashed people to think they are a matched couple when Zohran is a 5/10.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/26 05:45 PM
–

OP just said a guy from Norway flew to her country 5 times to see her
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/26 05:39 PM
–

You aren't ugly, but from what i can tell you are probably 5.5/10 or 6/10 max. No way a 7/10. Never a 7. That's literal model tier. And 6/10 nowadays for a women means you will be treated like royalty from 7/10 model tier men so i'm not suprised at all
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/26 05:29 PM
–

No fking way. Women are way way way overrated and men are way way underrated all the time. I can think of an example that will prove this. I bet you (and most others in this sub) think Zohran Mamdani's wife is a 6/10 or 7/10 or whatever. She's a 3/10. And he's a 5/10
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/26 05:26 PM
–

Go post yourself on r/truerateme and see if you get 7/10. If you admit yourself that you have an average face, then you aren't a 7/10.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/26 05:20 PM
–

No, men generally go for women they think they can get. Often they are of equal sexual market value (both looksmatched 5/10s), but nowadays female hypergamy means that 5/10 woman is going for the 6/10 or 7/10 man instead
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/26 05:19 PM
–

You aren't a 7/10
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/26 05:16 PM
–

Yes it’s called female hypergamy. Women only approaching men above their sexual market value.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/26 05:10 PM
2

Ain't the internet bro. Tallness has always been a indicator of male attractiveness
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 08:47 PM
3

Depends if he is genetically pre-dispositioned to have hair loss. If he keeps his hair into his 30s then he ages pretty well
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 08:45 PM
–

They are more likely to have those qualifications because there are statistically far more women in further education than men. Men are so checked out of society that they aren't even going to university anymore (they know the juice isn't worth the squeeze anymore for men), meanwhile feminism is pushing more women into university than ever before. This pay gap (among young men and women) is a recent trend and will only become more pronounced in years to come
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/26 07:37 PM
–

But WHY are women out perfoming men?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/26 07:17 PM
–

Yes they did exactly that (because they had the coercive power to do so, unlike 99% of men), but that does not disprove that they facilitated feminism. Because they can simultaneously abuse their status to take advantage of women and promote a feminism as a means to further push the majority of men away from power and pull women closer into their influence. Further and further away from the average man and closer and closer to the elite men of our society.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/26 07:15 PM
–

I don't think you know what ideological means
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/26 07:03 PM
–

Yes they're opportunists, and yes they facilitated both feminism and MAGA. Not sure how I made it ideological.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/26 07:01 PM
–

The financial elite would much rather pay more to women than to men (stats say that today young women out earn men). They want to keep the majority of men weak
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/26 07:00 PM
–

Just look at the stats at how young women now out earn men + more likely to move out of the house + more in further education. Elite groups of men want to keep the majority of men weak to consolidate their power and therefore gain more coercive powers over women (see epstein ring for example)
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/26 06:59 PM
–

It's not an ideological issue. Financial elite are all in bed with each other regardless of the "ideology" they put on for the public
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/26 06:50 PM
–

Financial elite facilitated feminism - Financial elite were all aware of Epstein's pedo ring + many many other rings we aren't aware of
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/26 06:43 PM
–

They don’t want to approach or put in effort because they already tried that repeatedly and got fuck all in return. Now women are complaining that men don’t approach anymore because they don’t get that 30 seconds of validation and dopamine as much. They will say “be chivalrous, put in effort, men used to go to war, etc etc” because they despise the idea that some men try to be happy somehow accepting a life without women, without playing to their tune, doing exactly what the life script tells th…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/26 07:33 AM
–

The thing is most men know other men who think this exact way about women who still sleep around a ton with no issue so they know this is bs and can continue to look at women the same way (whether it’s morally right or not)
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/26 07:24 AM
–

Dude these black pill nuclear ballistic missiles are waaayyyy too much for the normies of this sub to comprehend
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/26 07:16 AM
2

Ah so it was the exact same. I didn’t realise at first. Just finished watching the rest of it and it’s just blaming men (without naming the real cause). If he doesn’t have a job then he’s undatable because he’s broke. If he has a job then he’s undatable because he’s not focusing all of his energy on women. The same message conveyed from literally every woman the journalist interviewed was that the average man is pitiful in her view and she’s not willing to settle for less than a high value man. …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/26 07:10 AM
–

It would be daily lol. They will be getting hounded at everyday for things like not putting the toilet seat down or breathing too loudly, then simultaneously acting like the dogs bollocks on an anonymous forum
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/26 07:01 AM
2

I just watched some of the documentary https://youtu.be/pfEHQH1RSr0?si=5vn4glot-uVKzY84 and 5 minutes in she speaks to an evolutionary psychologist who drops the most phantom black pill nuclear truth bomb - she says more young women are in further education than men and getting into employment more than men whilst still being hypergamous sexually, therefore most women are unwilling to date unless they get a high value man. That’s insane that a left wing news organisation would let a black pill l…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/26 06:40 AM
–

Those blue pill guys are the worst. They will call you the i word and say how they have a wife and a “happy relationship” because of their personality but they are just an oofy doofy who some women had to settle for after she couldn’t keep her standards high into her 30s/40s and couldn’t cope with loneliness
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/26 06:12 AM
1

I was watching an insta reel the other day from the Guardian about the “dating global crisis” (rise in single people) and they were interviewing men and women in the street. The men interviewed were just saying how they were focusing on other parts of life. That’s it. Then at the end of the video some women concludes that a) men need to approach women more and b) stop watching social media content that makes them think a certain way about women. You’re right, mainstream media is starting to noti…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/26 05:53 AM
6

I’ve seen countless posts and videos from trans men who talk about how much harder it is being a man and how women are suddenly so cold to them, whereas before, they felt they shared a bond before transitioning. They not only recognise how hard it is dating as a man, but also how hard it is to make friends with other men
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 03:49 AM
2

No therapist for your face
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/26 03:34 AM
2

That makes it even easier for women because they get some dude to manage all the difficult financial side of it while she just sells pics at no effort whatsoever still making thousands per month. What do you mean how has that benefited women? That has benefited women in every way possible. Collecting money from desperate men while not even putting any effort in to collect it
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 04:29 PM
2

RP men who are successful with women are so used to faking it that it is second nature to them. Women are never picking up on it
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 03:56 AM
9

I’m not arguing that rejection justifies hatred. I’m arguing that repeated rejection and confusion can make young men vulnerable to ideologies that offer explanations. There’s a difference between explaining why something happens and saying it’s morally correct. If teenage boys are consuming rp content before graduating high school, that suggests influence and vulnerability, not that they were born misogynists
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 03:50 AM
-1

Exactly. Red pill teaches not to reveal such beliefs. But she is saying that she has a decent sense of when a guy is not 'blue pill'. The point is, she, and every other woman, will never truly know if a guy objectifies her merely as a sexual object in his head based on his behaviour and actions
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 03:36 AM
13

You are assuming that these unsuccessful men had a hatred for women before they found the red pill. Again, blaming men's actions for their situation. These men followed mainstream advice, it didn't work, they felt confused and invisible, they looked for alternative explanations, they found what they were looking for. You reduce it to moral failures rather than the influence of life situation
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 03:26 AM
3

I just don't think women have these mind reading superpowers that can tell if a man is a womanizer or not. If they find the man attractive, they will convince themselves that he is not like the others... "Oh! People don't get you for who you really are..."
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 03:04 AM
15

The reality is.. men who follow the red pill did not choose that life. They were sent there by their lack of dating success. Successful men never had the need to look for other solutions. You can say it's because those men hate women all you want, in order to blame men's actions for their lack of dating success rather than ever give those men any reason to just make peace with lives and stop blaming themselves for it. Just how society always tells them: it is their fault
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 02:47 AM
5

>As a woman, I am so much more attracted to men who see me as more than something to be conquered and led. If you can't always tell then you can't say this with any certainty
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 02:21 AM
3

Do you think you could tell if a man with red pill/black pill beliefs is only pretending to blue pilled in front of a woman? And if so, what are the tell tale signs?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 02:03 AM
17

Which do you think is correct: A) Men go through their lives without dating success after following typical blue pill dating advice and then afterwards are led to the red pill after searching for answers why it didn't out work for them B) Men without dating success in their lives always had a red pill dating mentality from the start
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 01:39 AM
2

I think it's higher than 2/1. More like 4/1 or 5/1
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 01:29 AM
6

Jeremy Meeks' emotional vulnerability and emotional intelligence was so profound that thousands of women could feel its presence even through the walls of his prison cell
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 01:01 AM
3

Multiple women with the same man
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 12:58 AM
6

The pink pill for women in this sub is that eventually they will have to settle down with one of the dudes rotting in this sub after their youthfulness fades away. Women have the luxury of choosing the top 20% of men for only so long
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 12:52 AM
2

Red pill = Blue pill
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 07:25 PM
1

Is white pill just MGTOW? (MSTOW)
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 07:21 PM
3

Do you tell them that or do you keep that to yourself
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/26 02:46 PM
1

No. Within the first 13 milliseconds.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 04:42 PM
9

those who are into blondes are really into blondes 100% yes. all women have a type (phenotype) and go feral if you are that type
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 04:39 PM
-1

You have to look at your phenotype then go for women who typically have dated a pattern of men of your phenotype (e.g. white blonde men, white brunette men, black men, eye colour). All women have a type and you can increase your return on investment by targeting those specific women
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 04:37 PM
2

The truth always slips out when the social inhibition is low because of alcohol
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/26 01:57 PM
–

That is the power of looks. He beat up women in his hay day yet women still bailed him out because of his looks
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/26 11:31 AM
–

Jeremy Meeks’ personality shone through the walls of prison to the thousands of women who payed for him to get out
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/26 11:22 AM
1

Dick size matters so much though. The dick pill is more brutal than the height pill even. Because you could have all the desire in the world from a woman but if you’re under average then you ain’t doing shit to her
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/26 06:12 AM
–

I would much rather she talked about how good I am in bed than how kind and thoughtful I am. If she tells her friends that I have a nice d then the return on investment is going to skyrocket
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/26 05:04 PM
–

Right, because on the other hand, women don’t want sex and value other things? No, women also want sex
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/26 08:04 AM
2

‘not being ambitious’. Yeah sure. That’s why you got dumped
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/26 08:00 AM
3

You can spend as much as you want on cosmetic surgeries as a dude. It will never be enough to make a meaningful difference. Or you will go too far and it will look uncanny valley
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/26 06:21 AM
–

That would disqualify every dude on here aha. It would just become r/TwoXChromosomes
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/26 06:16 AM
–

I feel bad for you man. Absolutely brutal
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 03:32 AM
–

Confidence regardless of what others think is delusion, not confidence. Just because you think you are something does not mean that you are
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 03:26 AM
–

Confidence comes from how other people treat you over your entire life. Someone who has low self-esteem is that way because they were bullied, ostracised, never spoken to their entire life. Cmon man stop coping.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 03:20 AM
–

Masculinity and confidence comes from years of positive feedback from others. You're never going to get that feedback if people don't perceive you as such. Both men and women subconsciously make assumptions about people by their appearance
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 03:06 AM
-1

Game is cope. The only valuable social skill is the ability to read social cues and body language. And that comes through years of experience and positive reinforcement so no normal guy is going to have it. Women on the other hand can read men like reading a book. That's why you get so many delusional guys falling in love with the first girl that speaks to them in a reasonably friendly way
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/26 12:31 AM
2

What does being ‘hyper capitalist’ have to do with it All western countries are capitalist these days
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/26 07:23 AM
1

So essentially every woman I know in real life has mental health issues?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/26 07:01 AM
0

Women don’t want to be treated like trash by high value men but it’s happens every single time because they are delusional thinking the guy is gonna commit when in reality he’s just going to pump and dump her and do it to another woman the next day. Result is one top 5% dude is passing around top 70% of the women who delude themselves into thinking that level of man is what she truly deserves. Guess what, she’s then going to feel bitter resentment towards any man that isn’t top 5%.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/26 06:40 AM
-3

Henry Cavill is actually wining and dining a fairly average looking woman. She’s attractive but he could certainly do much better. Meanwhile find any female celebrity who’s dating a man worse looking than her. It’s just basics of female hypergamy: never settle only ever date up
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/26 06:15 AM
-1

At least the average woman has a pick. She always will have guys wanting to date her. Just go on tinder or hinge and you will see. The average man has a grand total of zero women wanting to date him
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/26 05:47 AM
–

There are many reasons why women clown on men. But the main reasons are never actually told to men Socially accepted reasons to ridicule a man: height, hairline, age Not socially accepted reasons to ridicule a man: race, d size, facial attractiveness, physique
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/26 02:28 PM
1

Women are very vocal online about how they need clitoral stimulation to have an orgasm, but in reality, if the guy knows what he’s doing then most can orgasm through penetration alone. Some women just haven’t had the chance to experience it. The experience is far deeper and better in every way
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/26 02:49 PM
1

I never said I don't care if she doesn't have one. I said ideally make her cum. It's actually harder to make a man orgasm rather a woman (hammer the a spot for long enough). My main point of the man's pleasure being prioritised in sex from an evolutionary perspective is going over your head or you just refuse to engage with it at all
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/26 12:15 AM
1

It's not silly, it's true. I am aware though that a woman shouldn't hear that. Men withhold lots of information that they know will damage their reputation. Women do the exact same. Just because I believe it is secondary doesn't mean I don't want to achieve it. If I can't make a woman cum, I will be disappointed in myself (in my head) but I'm not going to apologise for it or appear to act sorry. It's up to her if she wants to then come back for more
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/26 11:55 PM
1

There's a reason I'm saying this on an anonymous site and not to a woman's face . Women are subconscious when it comes to attraction and go with the flow. Telling her about the "realities of biology" is obviously going to ruin the attraction. >those guys are what I'd consider as selfish or bad lovers. I mean I wouldn't be calling guys with insufficient hardware "selfish" they are just unfortunate haha
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/26 11:28 PM
2

I never said you would have sex for a biological or evolutionary reason. I said the incentive for women to have sex is for pleasure. I agree that there's zero incentive for a woman to have sex with someone who can't give you an orgasm (unless she's solely trying to get pregnant). My point is that the general biological purpose and function of sex leans towards the man's orgasm being the main focus. In that sense, the woman's orgasm would be a secondary consequence of the man's physical actions a…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/26 11:11 PM
1

You clearly have a good ability to pick the right dude haha. Better than most at least
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/26 10:59 PM
1

Very true. Some women's anterior fornix and posterior fornix are located deeper than in other women. Some guys just aren't equipped with the sufficient hardware to reach that far haha
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/26 10:53 PM
-1

>Sex is about all parties reaching orgasm. On a biological and evolutionary level, no... The woman does not require an orgasm to get pregnant and reproduce, unlike the man. There is still an incentive for a woman to have to sex because of the pleasure it gives her, however sex is not about both parties reaching orgasm.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/26 10:45 PM
1

Interesting topic and good post. I will say that in my opinion the key to good sex for both parties (on a one night stand) is for the man to take a noticeable focus in his pleasure over the women's, however simultaneously making her orgasm (potentially multiple times) without seemingly actively trying to achieve that outcome (this requires stamina, experience, and sufficient hardware). If the woman ever notices the man is putting a sincere effort into making her orgasm over himself (giving her o…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/26 10:37 PM
1

Perhaps. But that is such a miniscule part of typical "game" that it isn't really the same. For the average person, "game" isn't about saying hardly anything and just picking up on IoIs lol. In this context (mainstream thought) I would actually say that game hurts a guy's chances because he would then not be doing zombie game. lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/26 09:03 PM
4

It is “zombie game”. Which essentially means not engage in any traditional forms of game or PUA, say hardly nothing, but take a keen notice of whether she is giving IoIs or not and only then deciding to engage with her. Most guys who say “game” matters are damaging their chances by being overly desperate from the get go.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/26 08:42 PM
6

Second point is good. He doesn't need to chase or have "game", he just needs to recognise indicators of interests (IoIs) from women when they come and then just act upon the woman's desires from there on (taking it upon himself to escalate to her bedroom)
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/26 07:40 PM
–

Absolutely. Once she's had a taste of it, she will compare everything in the future to that experience. The only reason she isn't still with that guy is he left her for someone else
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/26 06:01 PM
–

Women will lie about it to make the guy feel better and revealing the truth is embarrassing to her because it is very sensitive and personal stuff. The thing is that giving foreplay and oral to a woman (god forbid using fingers because his d isn't good enough) is generally a submissive thing for a man to be doing in the bedroom
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/26 05:55 PM
–

>way more interested in how you use your hands and mouth and how you respond to their bodies that's the biggest load of bs i've ever heard
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/26 05:33 PM
–

It's just something you have to accept. It would be delusional to not expect her to think this way before she said it. At least you have it a lot better than most guys
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/26 05:24 PM
2

Women are at their sexual prime in their twenties and you are coping about it. I feel bad for you probably waiting until his 30s to finally have his chance
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/26 02:45 PM
2

Sex drive and “sexual peak” are not the same. Of course she’s going to have a higher sex drive later in life because she has fewer sexual options than when she was younger. Sexual peak would be her early 20s when her desirability and body is at its physical peak and the quality of sex is at its best.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/26 02:29 PM
0

women’s sexual peak is in their late 30s and early 40s There’s no way man
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/26 01:53 PM
13

I wonder how much you are underestimating the attractiveness of the men and overestimating the attractiveness of the women in these familiar sights you describe. Rarely I see a couple where the woman is better looking than the man. Even if this were the case, what you see is not telling of the whole picture. The woman will be aware that she could do much better and the guy is replaceable to her, so she will give him poor treatment. You are taking it at face value. Gen Z men are aware of this dyn…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/26 01:50 PM
3

What kind of boyfriend duties are we talking here
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/26 08:55 PM
–

Biologically driven sexual preferences are not bigotry. Heterosexual white women for example are statistically far more attracted to heterosexual white men than any other group. That does not mean they are inherently racist or homophobic/biphobic. These preferences do not come from a place of bigotry or hatred
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/26 01:30 PM
4

They are friends in the first place for a reason
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/26 12:51 PM
3

You’re right about it not portrayed in movies and tv shows because that’s popular mainstream media. There are some elements of it hidden there (fifty shades of grey for example overwhelmingly popular among women). Where it is portrayed however is m rated romance novels (where fifty shades originated) hidden within female spaces. That is a manifestation of a woman’s ideal sexual preferences for primal sexual attraction. That feeling does not exist in pornography for example (it can in amateur, bu…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/26 03:25 AM
3

It is not as simple as saying "males want more sex than females". Some women have a far higher libido than some men and that's a lot more common that you seem to believe
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/26 01:53 AM
5

Not all women read romance novels, but it is a representative sample of women's general sexual preferences. You may prefer sci fi, but you're still going to feel a similar way towards the male protagonist of a romance novel (if you happened to read it somewhere), just as much an avid reader of romance novels would. And that feeling is connected to the general sexual preferences of women. A feeling that is shown portrayed throughout tv shows and movies
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/26 01:49 AM
2

I don't think there's a libido gap between men and women. There are just as many sexually active women as men (probably more even comparatively). However there is a noticeable difference in the threshold required to trigger a sexual response in women than in men. That doesn't mean there is a "libido gap", that just means that women are attracted to fewer men as a proportion. But that primal sexual attraction still exists there for women. That's why when you look at the cover of romance novels, t…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/26 01:42 AM
3

Just because they do not openly demand it verbally does not mean it isn't true as a general sexual preference
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/26 01:30 AM
1

Being "sexually eager" is exclusive for men? Yet you just said women fantasise about it for men they are attracted to?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/26 01:25 AM
3

>I've never once seen women demanding "sexually eager" men Never heard of romance novels?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/26 01:11 AM
0

https://www.stevestewartwilliams.com/p/how-men-and-women-rate-each-other
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 03:42 AM
3

UK is the worst dating market on the planet
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 01:24 PM
–

How do you explain women with high body counts if they aren’t into men ‘sexually’? Women are having more one night stands than ever before. That requires a visceral sexual attraction. Granted, that’s only an attraction for a top percentage of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 11:14 AM
1

The best strategy is just ignore such questions. Don’t put yourself in situations where they will arise. Any answer has everything to lose but nothing to gain. You can’t gain attraction but you can lose it all and you can lose it fast.
/r/seduction13/02/25 03:05 AM
5

mfw I don’t get any of these /s Tbh this list is all true but at the end of the day you can just tell when a girl is into you or not. If you have to wonder if she is or isn’t interested in you then she probably isn’t..
/r/seduction18/09/24 04:57 PM
47

Number 1 thing would definitely be being overly invested/desperate. Having the character to shrug things off and move on easily goes a long way in regards to attracting girls
/r/seduction07/09/24 04:41 PM
18

Grow a mullet and moustache and you should be ideal
/r/seduction12/08/24 10:09 PM
2

Did Jeremy Meeks have to pay for any of this?
/r/seduction15/07/24 07:06 PM
–

I would say the opposite it true. I see more attractive men dating unattractive women
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/24 01:13 PM
6

Just wear a t shirt
/r/seduction05/07/24 10:59 PM
4

Step 1. Don’t take advice from Reddit. (After this) Step 2. (most important) Put value on yourself. If you have to improve yourself to achieve this then do it because your self-worth must change. How are you going to be confident and attractive to others if you yourself don’t believe in it? Step 3. Go out in the world, enjoy yourself, make friends, and make connections with girls.
/r/seduction28/06/24 04:17 AM
2

I don't care if she's single or not
/r/seduction10/06/24 12:40 PM
1

Don’t be needy. Be needed.
/r/seduction05/06/24 12:22 PM
1

Just fucking give up
/r/seduction18/05/24 03:48 AM
1

Just keep a good woman in your life mate
/r/seduction13/05/24 02:08 AM
-2

Fellow bj enthusiast 👍🏻
/r/seduction17/04/24 12:58 AM
1

Why do you think girls are there?
/r/seduction16/04/24 10:04 AM
9

Social circles and attractiveness
/r/seduction15/04/24 09:42 AM
1

Because you don’t need ‘game’ to get girls, you need luck.
/r/seduction01/09/23 12:33 AM
-4

It's over.
/r/seduction30/07/23 09:35 PM
1

How tall are you?
/r/seduction30/07/23 07:56 PM
3

Pretty girls are quite clever with these things.. they have so much experience in essentially manipulating and reading men that they know exactly how to manage power and control over a man.. I’ve never met a girl who didn’t have any experience in it at all. This means they can recognise very easily when you are giving control/attention to them so what I do is always act in a sort of nonchalant way around her.. I feel it makes me more intriguing in a way
/r/seduction18/07/23 02:06 PM
1

Fuck this long essay. A high value man is Chad.
/r/seduction01/06/23 04:27 AM
3

Just how objectively 'beautiful' are these women?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/23 02:18 PM
0

Indicators of interest
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/23 12:54 PM
4

Who said it was a crime? My point that you won't have much success approaching a girl who has shown no interest in you.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/23 12:54 PM
-1

Stop doing 'cold approaches'. Only approach a girl when she gives you IOI.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/23 12:22 PM
4

If a guy is physically attractive, women literally couldn’t care less how he acts
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/23 09:08 AM
8

Men are literally dying for a word of encouragement
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 04:32 PM
3

I get laid with hot girls. I'm not complaining at all
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 03:45 PM
6

Women can have any standards they want. Doesn't change anything
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 03:37 PM
1

Honestly, I don't care at all how a woman treats me initially. I know she's likely putting on a facade as she does to every other man. It's not that she actually wants to treat men 'badly', but it is in her best interests to be selective in modern society (society has manipulated her to act this way) because it allows her to get the best man she can get. What she says literally doesn't phase me (I'm honestly surprised if she doesn't 'treat me badly'), and eventually her character breaks; It alwa…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/22 02:53 PM
11

I would argue most ‘blue pullers’ are aware that it is a fantasy and only put on a facade because they worry about being ostracised
/r/TheRedPill28/12/22 04:30 AM
1

It comes down to whether a woman thinks a man is attractive and masculine in her view. There are many characteristics which factor into these. Being very tall alone does not make women think a man is attractive and masculine.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/22 03:52 PM
1

Viktor obv. Zelenskyy hasn't a fraction of his masculinity
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/22 01:20 PM
3

Are you sure of your sexuality?
/r/seduction06/09/22 11:04 PM
7

It’s so fucking easy. Just make eye contact with her and if she smiles then fucking talk to her and then fuck her
/r/seduction06/09/22 11:02 PM
2

For sure. They’re always tryna stir the shit
/r/seduction03/09/22 11:02 PM
3

If it’s not obvious to you that she’s into you in the moment, then she probably isn’t into you
/r/seduction03/09/22 07:53 PM
10

Prague, Berlin, Vienna, Budapest, Kraków, Bucharest, Bratislava, Warsaw
/r/seduction21/08/22 10:47 PM
1

It’s not about the internet mate, it’s about real life. This shitty word is used unnecessarily way too often as a put-down
/r/seduction03/08/22 03:54 AM
1

Ok but 99% of the time it is used in a toxic way
/r/seduction03/08/22 03:35 AM
1

Yep
/r/seduction03/08/22 03:32 AM
2

Agreed
/r/seduction03/08/22 03:20 AM
1

The problem is that the word ‘simp’ is way too misused. It is often used to make one feel better about himself by putting another guy down. When it is used in this manner, the word loses all true meaning and just becomes a brainless put-down to a guy. The word however, can be used correctly to describe a guy who is overly submissive to a female and gains nothing from it.
/r/seduction03/08/22 03:19 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter