TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Just_Another_Cog1 Archive

View 0 posts and 239 comments by Just_Another_Cog1 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

My experience is that getting into good physical shape will help you out in sooooooo many different ways, it'll eventually improve your social life. Not directly, to be sure, but having more confidence in yourself is a major factor in appealing to others.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/24 07:11 PM
–

No, it hasn't, and no, it won't. For some people? sure, it matters. For most of us? no difference whatsoever.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/24 02:04 AM
1

translation: trust me, bro response: whatever can be asserted without evidence can be just as easily dismissed without evidence. In other words, cool story, thanks for confirming you're full of shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/24 01:46 AM
1

Yes. Correct. That's why we ask for evidence, my dude. There's over 8 billion fucking people in this world, why the fuck should we accept one individual's experience as representative of reality? Do you seriously not understand how shit works? 🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/24 05:46 PM
7

Yeah, nobody cares, dude. You're full of shit and that's what matters.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/24 05:41 PM
1

Cool story, bro. My personal experiences tell me you're full of shit. Got anything else?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/24 05:39 PM
1

What stats? And what's your source?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/24 05:31 PM
1

If it's reality, then surely you'll have a source to back up your claim, right? 🤨
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/24 05:29 PM
8

Yeah, that's what I thought: you're just full of shit and have nothing of value to say.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/24 05:24 PM
–

[citation needed]
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/24 05:21 PM
7

. . . I'm sorry, what? "99%" of whom? And how the fuck can you make this claim? Got any data or evidence to back it up? 🤨
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/24 05:14 PM
2

"Chad" is nothing more than an attempt by disenfranchised and lonely men to explain why it is that they're alone. It's a misguided approach because it's based on assumptions about human nature and society that don't bear out under honest intellectual scrutiny. In short, anyone who thinks "Chad" is a reasonable term to describe human relationships (of any kind) is probably a brainwashed fool.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/24 05:13 PM
4

One minor correction: every man should live the "fuckboy" lifestyle if they can and if they want to. Dome people just aren't that unto sex and shit, and that's fine because it's not for everyone. (I mean, yeah, most people are into sex at some point in their lives; but I'm trying to acknowledge that some people have little or no libido, and that's perfectly normal.)
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/24 12:35 AM
–

. . . what? dude, seriously, stop huffing paint, it's gonna rot your brain
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/24 02:33 PM
0

almost tempted to set a new goal for myself . . . 😏😁 but thank you, that helps, much obliged
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/24 01:52 AM
0

. . . I'm sorry, [citation needed] my dude, how do you actually know what you're saying is true? 🤨
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/24 01:27 AM
1

. . . ok, now I'm curious: what's an example of the "huger ends of promiscuity"? (and for clarity, I pretty much reject most attitudes toward sex and sexuality on the basis of "if no one's being harmed, then it's all good." what I'm trying to understand is what you would consider, like, "going too far" with respect to how many partners an individual has.)
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/24 01:25 AM
3

And the rest of us feel that you should mind your own business. (I mean that in the best possible spirit, of course. 😁 I'm not saying you, specifically are the type of person to impose your beliefs on others; but the nature of this forum is . . . let's just say I'm trying to be as clear as possible when I say that everyone is entitled to an opinion and there's nothing wrong with someone being less adventurous than others . . . but there's also nothing wrong with being adventurous 😉.)
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/24 01:22 AM
1

which is mostly false but contains some truth to it. [citation needed]
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/24 04:37 PM
–

No. You started by saying people shouldn't have kids if they're likely to be autistic or neurodivergent. It's on you to back up this bullshit. Or admit that you're wrong and make an effort to change your view.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/24 04:04 PM
–

. . . I'm sorry, what? "Society is poorly structured and as a result, a certain group of people are suffering" and your suggestion for this problem is to work toward reducing the number of people in the affected group? Instead of fixing the fucking problem? 🤨 Gawddamn you suck . . .
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/24 04:01 PM
–

. . . and? A person's (in)ability to find employment in a society that actively excludes anyone who doesn't fit a certain definition of "normal," says absolutely nothing about that individual's worth as a human being. Stop talking down about neurodiverse people. You're coming across as an ignorant prick. (also, you still haven't provided citations for your claims, so I assuming they're also full of shit.)
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/24 03:55 PM
–

oh look, a bunch of wild claims with absolutely no evidence to support them . . . (p.s. acting like autism or ADHD are undesirable conditions we should be avoiding whenever possible is grossly insulting and rude as fuck. granted, I don't expect you to care, because people in this sub have a reputation for being giant dickholes . . . but I thought I'd point it out nonetheless.)
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/24 03:29 PM
1

Trump is "successful" (using a particular definition of the word and ignoring all the examples of when he failed) because he says he is and his toadies uncritically repeat the statement. Tate is the same: a liar, a fraud and a braggadocio. Society doesn't owe him a damn thing (except a cell, for all those crimes he committed).
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/24 05:14 PM
1

And I know burger flippers who can't pick their own noses. This doesn't mean that cooking a burger is a task that requires no skill. The fact that some people are bad at a given job has no bearing on whether or not the job itself requires skill (or lends itself to being improved by skilled workers). In other words, at this point, it seems pretty clear that you're just against sex work in principle. What I'm curious to know is: why? What's so awful or horrible about sex that you have to demonize …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 08:08 PM
1

Cool, thanks.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 04:35 PM
1

Same applies to you: I'm not the OP, so how could I possibly explain their thought process?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 04:34 PM
0

Yes, we know, you're free to live a life of total ignorance if you want.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 04:26 PM
1

lol! What you're asking for is that OP justify their position through argument or evidence/data. This "intellectual rigor" bullshit is a rhetorical tactic used to try and make you sound smart. It doesn't work. Just ask for OP's evidence, ok? Stop pretending to be something you're not.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 04:24 PM
1

I read the words on the screen. You should try it. It works wonders.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 04:20 PM
-3

. . . this is a list of countries and birth rates. What the fuck is this supposed to prove, exactly? That "poor people have more kids?" Ok, is Puerto Rico a rich or poor country? What's their birth rate? This article doesn't prove shit, my friend, please try again.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 04:04 PM
-1

[citation needed]
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 03:51 PM
2

How does giving resources to people in need "punish" people who aren't in that same position? Seriously, what kind of libertarian brain rot is this bullshit?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 03:49 PM
1

. . . kinda weird that you'd prioritize "the market" over the material needs of children.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 03:48 PM
-1

I do. That's how I know you're wrong. Maybe you should give the porn a break for a bit, yeah? k, bye
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 01:32 PM
1

Cool story, bro. 😎
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 01:02 PM
0

That's not what OP said. They said "it takes high intelligence to separate sex from intimacy." The reference to a pornstar was just one example of this. (p.s. I disagree with OP but for reasons that most people in this sub aren't even talking about; just wanted to clarify something with respect to your question, since it's kinda not the point.)
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 12:40 PM
-1

Because if you're really good at sex, you can make your client forget that you're doing it for money. The idea that sex work doesn't require any skill is absolutely laughable.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 12:38 PM
0

It's not. They're extrapolating from what you said before by adding their own spin. To their mind, "sex without intimacy" can only function as they described: like something out of a porno. What many people in this convo fail to realize is that "intimacy" can take many different forms.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 12:35 PM
0

Good. One less Red Piller is ultimately better for all humanity.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 12:32 PM
1

Unfortunately, we need to get to the point where "Did she secretly want it?" is no longer a response from the general public before we can swing back to the position of "We need to ask some uncomfortable questions*." That said, you and I aren't the arbiters of how this shit goes down in society. It's a trend (like any other) which we can contribute to (through conversations like this) but which we can't ultimately direct or control. (*also, that's a weak way to characterize the shit that victims…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/24 02:07 PM
2

Except you're ignoring the larger social context surrounding these topics. It's not easy for anyone (men or women) to come forward and accuse someone of sexual assault. Many people simply won't believe the accuser. This post and these comments are a great example of this: the fact that we're having this conversation, with so many people taking a hostile position against accusers, is enough to discourage someone from reporting an assault. When these talking points are applied at a national level …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/24 01:35 PM
1

It's weird as fuck. The problem, however, isn't that people are weird. The problem is that we live in a society that's become increasingly isolated for many individuals. This is because we've allowed capitalist principles to seep into virtually every corner of society. When you have to pay to get access to other people in a social setting, invariably many people in society are going to isolate themselves because they can't afford to be in those spaces or because they refuse to pay money for some…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/24 01:26 PM
-6

Good night, this is such a fucking stupid argument . . . you understand that "public opinion" isn't limited by "what we can prove in a court of law," right? And that "innocent until proven guilty" only applies to the legal process? In other words, the State is bound by this principle, not everyday ordinary people. What you're advocating for is the adoption of a legal principle as a social norm. Fuck that shit. If people want to avoid having their reputation tarnished by accusations, then they sh…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/24 12:55 PM
3

Criminal trials aren't the same as college disciplinary hearings, you absolute gawddamn genius, you.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/24 12:51 PM
2

. . . holy fuckballs dude, what the shit? [citation fucking needed] gawddamn
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/24 07:10 PM
0

And small furry creatures from Alpha Centuri behave like small firry creatures from Alpha Centuri. This is a meaningless statement in literally any context. More to the point, "common sense" changes with time and culture. What we consider common sense today could easily have been unheard of two hundred years ago. If we go back further than that . . . ? 🤷‍♂️ So yes, if you make a (substantial) declarative statement regarding the psychology of men and women, you need to provide evidence to back it…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/24 06:54 PM
-2

Please provide a citation that supports your position with respect to "patterns that both men and women follow respective of their gender." Because without evidence, you're just blowing smoke like everyone else on this sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/24 06:39 PM
-5

In laymen's terms, "women" aren't a monolith. Some people behave this way. Some do not. And some who do, aren't actually women, but they're men . . . because what we're talking about is behavior and personality, which isn't restricted or defined by gender. How the fuck do you chuds not understand this?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/24 05:56 PM
1

The underlying motivation is racism. Which means you're trying to say that "all men" are being treated poorly by "all women" in the same way that racists treat people of color poorly. That's insanely fucked up, for so many different reasons . . .
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/24 04:58 PM
-3

. . . you don't know how to read, do you?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/24 04:55 PM
-13

It's quite astonishing that you can say so much and be so wrong about all of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/24 02:53 PM
4

Almost like the Red Pillers are generally inconsistent with their rhetoric . . .
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/24 02:52 PM
2

I admit my generalizing was a bit heavy handed A bit? 🤨 Maybe try to, like, not apply your (erroneous) stereotypes to everyone in the world, yeah? k, bye.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 04:44 PM
0

. . . I'm sorry, what the fuck is this supposed to prove? You know people can be friends without knowing a middle name, right? Like this happens all the time . . . you don't have many friends, do you? Is that why you're making grand sweeping generalizations about entire groups of people? Because you're not happy with your life, therefore everyone else must be as miserable as you? 🤨
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 04:34 PM
16

men don't know how to be friends or make friends with other men. lol wut? I make male friends all the damn time, what the devil is this bullshit?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 03:03 PM
1

A women in a relationship can use sex to gain just about anything with her man. A hard no could turn into a yes once the sex card is thrown out. Not with me, nor in any of the relationships I've had. We all know this would apply to majority of men out there. Even men who are completely satisfied. [citation needed] Is there a female equivalent to this? We haven't established that your claim is actually True. Until then, it's just something you said (and wrongly believe).
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 01:53 PM
–

[citation needed]
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 10:26 AM
1

And this is what makes you an asshole.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 09:16 PM
1

. . . you don't think people are entitled to food and water? or shelter or clothing? 🤨
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 09:01 PM
4

Puzzle Gap's comment comes across as denigrating the woman's point of view. Normally, I probably wouldn't care so much, since I consider it appropriate to downplay an opposing argument (when it's clear that the argument is harmful or bad). In this case, PG also portrayed his position as perfectly reasonable . . . as though he were owed sexual relations. I'm sorry, but no one is owed intimacy from any one individual. I agree that, under the right circumstances (such as a truly just and good socie…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 01:36 AM
1

Doesn't that mean we should be discussing it? Just because pop culture has a particular view on a given topic doesn't mean that it's actually reflective of reality. I'd dare say (based on personal experience) that a lot of people (probably) have dry spells in their intimate relationships. And since I think it's so common, I'm inclined to say "Nothing wrong with it happening from time to time." My ex and I would go through periods of frequent sexual activity followed by periods of no sexual activ…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 01:26 AM
5

Good night, I've never heard anyone refer to an intimate relationship as an "investment." Gross.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 12:04 AM
0

. . . I'm sorry, how is this "well known?" Because it's been a joke for sitcoms since the early days of television? Where are you getting this?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/24 11:50 PM
10

No one is entitled to another person's body, you realize that, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/24 11:49 PM
2

. . . because?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/24 11:48 PM
1

To be clear, we are animals, it's just that we've learned to conduct ourselves in a manner not typically found among other animals in this world.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/24 08:41 PM
9

I've been friends with at least a dozen women over my lifetime (40+ years). I've had friends who were girls as a kid and in highschool; I've had female roommates in college (who I considered friends because I won't room with someone who isn't); and in all of my romantic relationships, I was friends with the person first (female or male 😁😉). The fact that I exist and have had these relationships is all the evidence anyone needs to demonstrate your position false.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/24 08:40 PM
–

Very odd to see a woman outright rejecting another woman's story as retold to us by a man instead of, like, just saying "hey maybe you got the story wrong?" 😶
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/24 05:19 PM
3

All knowledge needs citation. That's how we know it's knowledge: justified true belief. I've seen enough of the world to know that "common knowledge" is often anything but.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 11:00 PM
2

A screenshot isn't a citation. But at a minimum ~ which is commendable for a sub like this ~ you have correctly grokked the thrust of my main point: in the absence of actual evidence or data, we tend to fall back on our experiences and our priors. I know what you're talking about and I don't (generally) disagree. It makes sense to say "men achieve orgasm more easily" because there's a biological imperative to do so. . . . but here's the thing: that same imperative would support the argument that…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 10:43 PM
2

[citation needed] (also, if you prefer to work from anecdotal rebuttals instead, I'm one of those guys for whom reaching orgasm requires a certain mental frame of mind. I enjoy sex, sure, and I'm a slut (also true 😁) . . . but I can't orgasm with just anyone. that's fucking weird.)
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 08:01 PM
1

Patriarchy: 1) a system of society or government in which the father or eldest male is head of the family and descent is traced through the male line. 2) a system of society or government in which men hold the power and women are largely excluded from it. 3) a society or community organized on patriarchal lines. This took me less than five seconds to find with a Google search. Seriously, do you really expect people to believe the shit you say? 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 07:12 PM
1

Translation: I have no proof, but trust me, bro!
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 06:59 PM
5

Pretty sure there are more than three types of people in a world with over eight billion souls . . . 🤔
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 06:46 PM
2

Women are also guilty of this, but biologically culturally speaking men tend to be a lot easier to please so it's a lot less obvious. fixed it for ya
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 06:27 PM
0

ok mr. month old account which only visits this sub 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 06:19 PM
1

Feminists literally run the world. [citation fucking needed], muh dude 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 05:14 PM
0

A 12 year old lacks the knowledge and social awareness of an adult, so it only makes sense you would think that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 05:14 PM
1

My mother and uncle are still alive. So are grandparents (and even some great grandparents) all across the nation. What the absolute fuck are you talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 04:04 PM
2

Lotta words to say "My beliefs lack sufficient justification or evidence."
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 12:05 PM
2

I'm sorry, you can read my mind now? You made a claim, now either put up or shut up.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 11:18 AM
0

The simplest explanation is that when you're used to privilege, equality feels like oppression. This perfectly describes the Red Pill movement, my dude, what the absolute fuck are you talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 11:17 AM
-1

As much as women claim to value "Clear and frank" communication they don't. Everything has to be in code with none of these rules clearly communicated. This is bullshit. Some people value clear communication. Some people genuinely prefer to mess around and play mind games. (Personally, I go either way 😁😘, depending on my mood and who I'm with.) Hell, some people don't even realize that they're being vague with their comms and signals. Lots of people have learned how to communicate in a way that …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 02:26 PM
0

Can't access the article, locked behind a paywall. And I don't care about your choice to be lazy. If you make a claim, it's on you to back it up. That's how good science works (which I'm sure you understand).
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 02:02 PM
1

That's not a citation. And I reject this reasonable argument on the grounds that, in the absence of data to support it, it's purely anecdotal. Some people were raised like this, sure, but some weren't. What's the demographics look like?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 01:13 PM
1

Studies show that feminists expect benevolent sexism (better treatment) as a baseline, and men who treat women as equals, expecting split bills, fair split of responsibilities, etc. are seen as misogynist. [citation needed] And assuming you have a legit source, I'd be curious to understand what you think the root cause is. Like, is it possible it's from social standards and cultural trends? meaning there's a reasonable argument coming from the feminist side, if we take the time to understand it?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 12:44 PM
0

No, she's not. We see it all the damn time. Your rhetoric isn't nearly as slick as you like to think it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/24 06:24 AM
5

I'm saying you have a bizarre obsession with blaming women as a whole for your personal social grievances. Grow up, dude. Maybe try stepping outside your door and meeting real people in the real world. Learn that life is more complex than the shit-slingers of the Red Pill manosphere have been telling you it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/24 11:48 PM
4

Noble Savage is my pornstar name.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/24 11:14 PM
47

What an absolutely myopic and unhinged thing to say . . .
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/24 07:20 PM
3

I know. Unfortunately, it's just a screenshot from your phone. It tells us absolutely nothing about your browsing habits or how you interact with the internet (i.e. we can draw no meaningful conclusions from it beyond "OP is convinced of X seemingly without verifiable proof"). (p.s. I saw pics of people doing "influencer"-type shit..I didn't see any porn. Not sure what the problem is, really . . .)
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/24 11:57 AM
2

Before y’all hit me with the “well it’s your algorithm” I promise you it’s not I can show you my explore feed rn. Ok. Show us.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/24 11:51 AM
3

Uh-huh. So you're basically saying that you haven't a single clue why you think what you think . . . do I have that right? 🤨
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/24 10:14 AM
6

I'm saying that OP needs to provide a citation to support their claim that "outsiders are often shocked by how happy [the Amish] are."
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 10:10 PM
17

The Amish for example are extremely traditional, and outsiders are often shocked by how happy they are. [citation needed] When I rack my brain for arguments on how traditional marriage is evil, I can only find examples from White Anglo-Saxon societies like America and England which were particularly oppressive, not just to women but to slaves and lower classes in general. You need to study history. Until the 19th century, there were no consistently applied legal consequences for men who physical…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 12:55 PM
–

That's about the quality of intellectual rigor I've come to expect from the Red Pill crowd. Thank you for confirming my assessment.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 12:45 PM
–

Women have only really tolerated male sexuality in exchange for provisions for most human history. [...] Most men aren't attractive to women, [women] just settle when they eventually want to have a family. [citation needed]
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 12:28 PM
2

omigosh yes! Nia Vardalos is another great example. Good looking as a young woman, absolutely stunning as an older lady. (Of course, there's something to be said about how having money helps with this . . . and the free time for good diet and exercise . . . but I'm only acknowledging it because obviously these things are complicated, dynamic and nuanced. It's not fair for anyone to reach a specific conclusion about which component has a greater impact, at least not without data to back it up. Th…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/24 11:19 PM
6

Which men? And are you saying this based on what you've seen/heard/read? or based on data (such as from a study or survey)?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/24 07:56 PM
3

The older I get, the more I find older women attractive. Yes, of course, a young woman (or man, I don't discriminate 😁😉) is more attractive (in a manner of speaking) but that doesn't detract from how attractive women my age and older appear to me. I think there are more people who think like I do (in this specific context) than don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/24 07:56 PM
1

Translation: I have no data but here's my feelings on the matter. As a rebuttal, my feeling is the exact opposite. I will gladly step into the father role (if I were trying to date a single mother). And I know plenty of guys who would do the same. (I agree that Reddit doesn't count as a good metric, obviously.)
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/24 07:19 PM
0

The problem is that the statement requires qualification. What source or data do we have that "single men generally don't want to be with single mothers?" Because without something to back this up, it's nothing more than an opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/24 06:36 PM
-1

. . . I'm sorry, what? Over 60% of American families have both parents working. I haven't dug deeper into that statistic yet but I'm willing to bet that it's skewed heavily toward lower income families (for obvious reasons). But if we talk about personal experiences and individual views, I'm a single dad, though my ex has primary custody of our kids; but if I had custody, you can bet your ass I'd expect any potential future partner would be expected (by me) to contribute to my family. Because th…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/24 05:55 PM
1

And you're pretending that you're not saying what you're obviously trying to say. (also, you didn't answer my questions, leading me to think my initial interpretation of your words is correct.)
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/24 05:05 PM
3

Exactly. People are people. We're not a monolith, no matter how we try to categorize ourselves. (but also, from what I've seen thus far, OP hasn't provided data or sources that back up their position, meaning anecdotal rebuttals are all we need to reject the premise.)
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/24 05:04 PM
1

And what do you think this means? More to the point, why do you keep repeating your personal experiences as though they fucking matter for the conversation at hand?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/24 04:22 PM
13

When men are horny, they’ll bang anything! Anything! No they won't. I'm sitting with two of my guy friends right now and both of them say "Fuck no, I won't, what the hell is wrong this this person?" Now, me, personally? I'm a slut 😁, to be sure, but I still have standards. men grow up and by extension become less horny. . . . uh no we don't. I mean, sure, some of us do, but I'm as horny now as I was when I was a teenager. (I might not always be able to get hard but I'm almost always horny. 😁) Le…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/24 04:17 PM
2

Exactly.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/24 04:03 PM
1

Because you seem to be implying that "This thing exists" means something. I'm saying that it means nothing because we don't have enough information (in this conversation, at this moment) to draw any meaningful conclusions from what you've said.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/24 03:39 PM
0

Yes. It tells us we have certain prejudices. It doesn't tell us why those prejudices exist. Did you not read what I wrote before? because I'm literally repeating myself right now.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/24 03:15 PM
-6

Yeah, that's what I thought.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/24 02:18 PM
-1

What the fuck does that mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/24 02:02 PM
-2

Why?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/24 01:56 PM
-3

All this demonstrates is that we have certain prejudices in our society. Whether or not those prejudices are grounded in fact hasn't been established.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/24 01:56 PM
2

I'm an average single dad (recently divorced) and I find single moms as attractive as anyone else. Why does it "seem" otherwise? Probably because people lie about how the world works and other people believe those lies. Why are people lying and why do others believe the lie? Lots of reasons. We would need to know more about the specific individuals and/groups involved to make an assessment. (Because unlike most of y'all Red Pill folks, we don't make judgements without having access to reliable i…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/24 01:54 PM
3

That's a lot of words to say "I don't understand how science works."
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/24 08:20 PM
3

uh-huh. So . . . what you're saying is . . . you haven't a fucking clue what the term means nor can you find anyone who actually takes it seriously (like an academic or scholar) meaning everyone can see you're full of shit. Cool.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/24 05:23 PM
3

good night, you're pathetic. go on, then. you think "gynocentrism" is a Thing. show us. how do you define the term? and can you produce a single legitimate source that actually recognizes this concept?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/24 04:37 PM
-1

define "gynocentrism." then let's see you provide any legitimate source that recognizes the concept.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/24 04:32 PM
2

gawddamn, you're dumb
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/24 04:31 PM
13

"I'm not blaming feminism, I'm just pointing out all the ways that feminism has fucked us over." Do you ever stop and read what you've written?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/24 11:32 AM
3

when applied to men, compulsive heterosexuality is a phenomenon in which many men are asexual or homosexual, but feel pressure to be attracted to women and receive female validation due to living in a gynocentric patriarchal society. Fixed it for ya. (p.s. a brief explanation: our society is patriarchal and has been for centuries, possibly millennia. patriarchy hurts men just as it hurts women (maybe more or less, don't know and don't care, because it's not a competition). pretending that the pr…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/24 11:31 AM
0

. . . gawddamn y'all are thick, aren't ya?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/24 02:26 PM
–

Assuming that because I’m looking to find a wife, that automatically means I’m thinking about having sex with any woman I meet. You skipped this part: (Side note: can't help recognizing that your language here is focused on "can she ultimately fulfill my needs?" as opposed to "what does this person want out of life?" Very weird, creepy and selfish, all at the same time. 😬)
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/24 01:36 PM
-5

Capitalism is the problem, my dude, not women. Stop it. Get some help.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/24 01:20 PM
-1

lol! Congratulations 🎉 Does not work for me, tho. Why is that? I think I have your answer: it would be nice, to be able, to be 100% yourself, without faking some aspect of your personality, but that is not how dating looks. You think dating requires you to hide yourself in order to find a good partner? 🤨 No wonder your life sucks.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/24 01:19 PM
–

Why do you recommend dating with no intent behind it instead? Again, I didn't say this. Why do you insist on putting words into my mouth? This is also fucking weird as hell, almost like you have a particular worldview and don't know how to look at anything in any other way . . . 🤔 Would you give this same criticism to women who date with the intent of getting married one day or at least finding a LTR? If those same women also talked about men the way you talk about women, yes. [...] through talk…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/24 01:17 PM
-2

"Good for general life but for finding a romantic partner" first, seems to work just fine for me; second, why do you think this? What do you think is so different and/or special about dating that "being you" isn't sufficient?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/24 01:00 PM
-3

Just one: were you disparaging that advice or do you think it's actually good to tell people these things? (I believe the latter and I might have misread your comment above.)
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/24 12:24 PM
–

So do you believe I should give every woman who shows me interest a chance? I didn't say this. it seems like you are saying to disqualify someone before ever meeting them is “putting them in a box” and “fucking bizarre.” I am. The problem is that you see "meeting a woman" as "this person might be a potential wife." That's fucked up because you know absolutely fuck-all about this person. Have you ever tried, like, just talking to a woman without simultaneously thinking about what it'd be like to …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/24 12:22 PM
–

Because you're not looking for a partner. You're looking for a wife. You're not treating her as a person with equal value and worth in your relationship. You're putting her into a box (before you've even met her) and you're refusing to adapt your expectations. Granted, yes, there are some expectations that are reasonable; but unless you feel like listing them in detail, we're not going to get into that. Generally speaking, your approach is to define this person you've never met and it's fucking …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/24 12:09 PM
-8

It's good advice, too. Have you tried it?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/24 12:03 PM
–

"wifey qualities"? 🤨 this is a f---ed up way of looking at the world, bro, seriously
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/24 11:57 AM
–

You shouldn't be. My mother remarried when she was in her fifties. I've known several men and women who changed partners throughout their lives. There is literally no such thing as being "too old" for intimate relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/24 11:55 AM
0

men generally have no standards This isn't true. I'm a man and I have plenty of standards; furthermore, the men I personally know also have their own standards. men are pornsick and spoilt by beautiful women in media I don't even know what this means. But also, if'n you actually can explain it, [citation needed]. if men lower their standards too much, they come across as desperate and suuuuper unattractive . . . yeah you're gonna hafta explain the other shit before this one even begins to make s…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 12:26 PM
6

. . . bro Have you heard of the prostate? Did you know it's possible to orgasm from stimulating the prostate? Two ways, actually, because stimulating the prostate can cause a regular orgasm (with the usual spurt and all that) but it can also cause a prostate orgasm. Oh! Also, when you cum from tickling your prostate, you don't have to be hard. You can even ejaculate. No boner required. (p.s. This doesn't work for all men, of course, but it's a real enough phenomenon.) Is it important to be hard …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 10:00 PM
–

F--- off, c---, I'm not the one making misogynistic claims. Go bother the other dickhead.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 07:07 PM
–

. . . not everyone gets paid to fuck on camera, dude. Some of us do it for free because we like it. 😁 Seriously, tho, if you don't have any data to support your claims, then there's no point in believing anything you say.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 07:00 PM
–

One individual's personal experiences don't necessarily qualify as data, unfortunately. Your buddy might have lived someplace where the majority of the action was being handled by guys, sure; but there could easily be another location where it's all being serviced by women. Remember, there are over 8 billion people in this world. That's enough to claim just about any bizarre sexual behavior as functionally "normal" . . . meaning you need to give data if you're going to make sweeping claims* abou…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 06:59 PM
–

Show me the same amount of women willing to do the same and I will admit defeat. . . . are you not familiar with the concept of "amateur porn?" 🤨 like, this is Reddit, there's a sub out there for everything . . . I just don't get it, how do you folk fall into these insane worldviews? it's f---ing weird 🤔🤷‍♂️
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 06:55 PM
–

. . . my brother in Christ, first, I'm a man and I will not use a gloryhole. They're disgusting as f---. Second . . . who the f--- do you think is sucking all that D? 😂 Takes two to tango, my friend. 😁😘
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 06:45 PM
–

Most men have to take what they can get, because they want and need sex way more than women. [citation needed] The simple laws of supply and demand have created an enormous imbalance where women have the illusion of choice simply because men are desperate for sex. There is no such thing as a "sexual marketplace." That's a red pill fabrication, mostly pushed by people who are just really bad at meeting and making friends. Men stay within their league, women shoot way out of theirs. This is also b…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 06:41 PM
–

You did. Specifically, you said they're not as horny as men, but that's just not true. Plenty of women are just as horny (and more) as men; just how some men don't care all that much for sex (yes, they exist).
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 06:34 PM
2

Yes, well, no study is perfect. 😉
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 04:19 PM
23

"Be gay. Do crime." is a slogan for a reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 02:55 PM
0

nobody f---ing cares muh dude
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/24 04:28 PM
2

Counterargument: your "modern male" concept began nearly a hundred years ago. There's nothing modern about people being people and forming close personal relationships with others around them.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/24 04:13 PM
-2

if I was a model recruiter Fortunately, you're not, and probably never will be.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/24 04:11 PM
–

They're not meant to solve the problem of inequality, they're a bandaid measure meant to alleviate the symptoms of a larger social issue. Solving inequality would require something far more drastic, like possibly wealth redistribution on a massive scale.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/24 11:49 AM
–

Good proposal, bad reasoning, but we'll take it 👍
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/24 12:12 AM
2

Most people actually want to be the adorers, most People don't think they do, but they actually do. What evidence or data do you have to support this claim?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/24 07:41 PM
–

My brother in Christ, there are over 8 billion people in this world. I promise you, there is more under the sun than is dreamt of in your philosophy.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/24 03:43 PM
–

I've never heard of a guy getting tired of women and dating men instead. That you've never heard of it, doesn't mean it doesn't happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/24 10:55 AM
–

It's your personality.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/24 10:54 AM
–

if she says she doesn’t do that she probably lying. Good night, you're a lovely dude, aren't you? 🤦
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 09:03 PM
2

You said men need to improve something about themselves and they are losers who can’t get dates who create such terms. Quote me and explain how my words match what you're saying here.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 06:55 PM
5

So you’re saying men are losers and need to improve themselves? . . . gawddamn, dude, what an insanely stupid thing to say. Go back and read what I wrote again. Slowly. Maybe find someone else to read it and tell you what it says. Women generally don’t date “losers” lol! My brother in Christ, I was one of the biggest losers on the f---ing planet for, like, half my life at least . . . and I still got dates with women. This shit isn't difficult. Stop treating women like things to be possessed. The…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 05:52 PM
9

You seriously need a citation to prove hypergamy or that women choose the top percentile men? Yes. In my experience, there are plenty of women who do not engage in "hypergamy." Indeed, I'm inclined to think the term is completely made up (probably by a bunch of losers who can't get dates and have learned to hate women rather than figuring out what they need to improve about themselves). Unlimited sexual access. Assuming there [are] no restrictions on what you can do and what you want. . . . and …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 05:39 PM
11

I think it’s very clear at this point what most people tend to do with unlimited sexual access. . . . what? What the f--- does "unlimited sexual access" mean? 🤨 Women go for the highest possible man they could get (top 1%) and men go for the most number of young attractive women. [citation needed] So how do we fix this? Fix what? I don't think you've even come close to presenting an actual societal problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 05:17 PM
4

I won't. And everyone else will know you can't defend your position. 👌
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 05:10 PM
2

Nope. You made the claim, it's incumbent on you to provide support for it. I'm not doing your work for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 05:02 PM
3

Do you have any source or citation that backs up your claims? Or is this just your personal interpretation of the ideology?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 04:56 PM
5

That's interesting because I've yet to come across anyone who identifies with "red pill" ideology who doesn't actually think the things you listed in the OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 04:54 PM
14

What's weird, though, is that there are plenty of women interested in casual relationships, including hookups, ethical non-monogamy, polyamory, etc. You just have to be patient when looking for them because they don't always put that information out front. (Same for guys, btw, I'm not trying to make sweeping generalizations or anything.)
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 03:05 PM
2

good on ya mate. that's the right attitude.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 12:01 PM
–

The vast majority of women, I would say 95%+ for sure [citation needed]
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 11:35 AM
0

Your flair system is irrelevant, though, because when I talk about "red pill ideology," I'm specifically referring to the origins of the movement. Stuff like "black pill" or "purple pill" are derivative positions that wouldn't exist without the RPers and their toxic lies. That's the thing: it's all lies, misinformation and misdirection. Red v. Blue v. Black who gives a f---? y'all are wrong about how the world works and what's worse, your being wrong is leading others to adopt wrong and harmful …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 10:52 AM
–

I reject your definition of "sexually successful." I was married for over ten years. Never had another partner during that time. That was a "successful" period of my life (sexually speaking), even though we went through several stretches of little to no sexual activity between us (followed by stretches of lots of sex). Also, you didn't link to a study, so we don't know what you're talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 07:11 PM
–

. . . what an ignorant thing to say. How would you even attempt to go about proving this?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 07:10 PM
–

There's nothing in the rules about that.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 07:09 PM
30

It's not. That's the point. The people who are committed to the RP ideology don't want a reason for rejection, they just want an excuse to piss and moan about how the world is unfair and everyone is against them.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 03:58 PM
1

Dating apps are not a good metric for interpersonal relationships and dating habits. They automatically skew toward a specific set of people: those who use dating apps. For example, I didn't use dating apps until very recently (in part because of our divorce) while my ex never uses them (and likely never will). Of course, one might argue that dating app data is reliable since it represents a large portion of the general public . . . but I'm rather doubtful of this. The mere existence of the app …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 03:53 PM
1

You still haven't provided anything even remotely close to evidence to support this position. I realize I haven't pushed hard on this and I've been using reason to argue my position, but it's reaching the point where you're making a bunch of claims that, as far as I'm aware, simply aren't true. This is why I asked for a citation of some kind: too many RP folk wok off of vibes and that's just, like, a really bad way to understand the world.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 03:26 PM
4

Or she could just be the exception! But most women aren't. [citation needed] the terms are open to interpretation because money and looks are not the only qualities that matter. The ones that matter are the ones that woman personally cares about. If they're open to interpretation and are subjective to the point that we should be focusing on what this woman, specifically, wants out of a relationship . . . doesn't that, like, disprove the AWALT position? "All women want X . . . except for all thes…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 03:14 PM
-1

And you can give justification (however thin) to be banned from these forums when people (inevitably) report your comments because they don't like what you have to say.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 03:11 PM
1

Good news for me (I guess?) . . . 😁😉
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 02:43 PM
4

I am convinced this applies to virtually all women; i.e "female nature," and the only places where it doesn't apply are cultures that still subjugate women and female nature through legal means, religion, culture, or all three. My ex-wife (when we were dating in college) was not "dating up." My plan was to be in the National Guard and become a published author, i.e. I was planning on being poor and starving most of my life. She was the one with a Master's degree and career aspirations. She also …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 02:41 PM
3

So . . . you're saying that Red Pill men don't like women? shocking
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 02:32 PM
6

At what point should we consider a given trait common enough to be generalized in this manner? 50% or more of the population? And which population are we referring to? "All women" in New York City would be different from "all women" in a small town deep in rural Mississippi; likewise, it's not fair to compare women from the upper crust of NYC to the working poor. In other words, I'm not convinced that AWALT applies in practical terms often enough for it stand up in a discussion about dating cult…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 02:19 PM
0

[citation needed]
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 01:49 PM
–

The problem with your argument is that "unconditional love" doesn't exist. The closest anyone can get is an abusive relationship where one person routinely "forgives" their partner despite the fact that they treat that person like total garbage. This forgiveness is pathological, being a form of self-harm; and in that sense, the "love" felt by the abused partner can be called "unconditional" . . . but in general, I find the idea of absolutes to be extremely difficult to accept. More likely than n…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 01:26 PM
-3

It's not like men are the ones laser-swiping left on anyone who doesn't have the proportions of a starlet . . . what the f--- does this even mean? It's not like men are the ones who are getting icks over innocuous things No, seriously, what the absolute f--- . . . It's not like men are the ones refusing to settle, because there aren't any attractive women out there anymore . . . BRO WHAT THE F--- ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT??? u/Judaicyrus is right, you need to get off the internet and go meet people …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 01:22 PM
–

[citation needed]
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 09:09 PM
–

lol! My brother in Christ, I'm using the same f---ing logical framework you chuds use on a daily basis: "I had a bad experience with a woman one time and now I think all women suck donkey balls!" There are over 300 million people in the United States alone. There are over 8 BILLION people in this world. Statistically speaking, your personal experiences (as well as mine) are f---ing irrelevant. So which is it? Do I get to count my personal experiences against yours or are we supposed to ignore bo…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 09:01 PM
-1

Comparing the dating pool to a marketplace is horses---. It's literally brain rot and you need to stop doing it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 08:42 PM
5

Counterpoint: the problem of "male loneliness" isn't limited to men. It applies equally to all genders and all persons in our society today. And the cause of this "loneliness epidemic" is the continued expansion of capitalist greed into every aspect of our culture. When was the last time you took a walk down the street and just, like, hung out at the mall? Or at a park? Or a gym or fairgrounds or any other public arena, where you weren't expected to pay for the privilege of being there? There ar…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 08:34 PM
14

I wanted kids. So did she. We had kids. We don't regret it. Personally, I think it's kinda weird that people obsess about this stuff. Want kids or don't, with a partner or without, and have a big or small family, whatever you want from life. There's no wrong answer here. . . . actually . . . and because I'm a political junky who spends way too much time following what right wing ideologues have been saying over the past few years . . . I'm starting to wonder about the larger "rhetoric" or "narra…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 08:02 PM
–

. . . good night, you're dense 😑
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 06:43 PM
–

Your question is flawed. You're comparing "dating app interactions" with "IRL interactions" as though they're even remotely similar (in terms of social dynamics), when they simply aren't.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 06:36 PM
6

When we were in college, my ex and I had that plan: where she'd be the career earner and I'd be the househusband (with a side of National Guard duty for extra income). Had it not been for the economic slump in 2008 and getting pregnant in 2009, we would have gone that route. I find it bizarre that so many people continue to cling to antiquated gender roles in the 21st century. This is supposed to be the future, damnit!
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 06:32 PM
–

What is it with y'all on this sub not paying attention to what other people write . . . ? it's freaking weird What makes you think "women are unwilling to send a first message?" Women have reached out to me several times (and I've only been using these apps within the past few months). Hell, men have reached out to me too 😁. Regardless, to the question at hand, I've had several conversations with women over the past few months (in person, in casual settings) which could (maybe, possibly) turn in…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 06:28 PM
–

I think that meeting someone is a lot easier than y'all seem to think it is. Hell, I've met maybe a dozen people in the past few months who I had a fairly pleasant conversation with; from there, it only takes a little more socializing to figure out if they're interested in being friends (beyond the immediate situation, that is). See, when you're on a dating app, there's an expectation that you're both there for a specific purpose: to get each other wet. That's crass, I know, but that's how peopl…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 06:22 PM
–

. . . you realize there are other ways to meet people than just through one dating app, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 05:54 PM
3

. . . and what are the chances you think these "men haters" do horrible things to men . . . but you can't back up those claims with evidence or data?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 04:32 PM
9

Yeah, I'm noticing a weird pattern on this sub, where the RP dudes constantly post articles and links that don't actually support their positions. Almost like they don't think people will bother to read and call out their bulls---. . . 🤔
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 03:09 PM
9

Cool. Did you read the article? The protest on 86th Street stemmed from residents opposing the construction of a shelter for adult men – a first in the neighborhood, according to city officials. Protesters, however, believe it's too close to schools, day cares and a nearby train station. [...] Councilmember Susan Zhuang said she was protecting a senior citizen who was under a barricade during Wednesday's protest when she alleges police used excessive force and a scuffle ensued. Seems like these …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 03:03 PM
4

I'm a feminist and I don't "hate men."
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 02:25 PM
3

Fox isn't a reliable news source for this topic. Do you have anything from an outlet that doesn't have an obvious agenda?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 02:24 PM
6

Brilliant post. Shame it's only going to fall on deaf ears . . .
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 02:23 PM
–

My ex wife was not one of those women. This disproves your claim. . . . that's how this works, right? You take your personal experiences and apply them to the entire world without the slightest bit of nuance or introspection? Fine. I reject your reality and substitute my own; and I recommend everyone reading this do the same, because you're clearly incapable of forming a coherent, rational thought.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 12:39 PM
–

I think you're overgeneralizing your personal experiences with people (allegedly) treating you poorly. I also think you're wrongly applying those experiences to the entire world instead of trying to figure out what the actual problem is.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 12:38 PM
–

The reason you think some of us lack social skills is that actually we are socially ostracised, alienated and despised. The reason I think this is because I see it. All the damn time. Hell, I was one of you (before I joined the Army). You know why I'm not anymore? Because I put myself into awkward social situations and I learned how to make them less awkward. (in the process, I also learned that people are people, and that it's wildly inappropriate to label people according to a single physical …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 11:49 AM
–

lol! f--- off with that bulls---, dude, the only academics who are "afraid to speak the truth" are the ones who are lying to you . . . and considering that they're lying to you, I'd say they're not afraid of speaking at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 11:46 AM
–

. . . it changes things when the other Barbies apologize to him. When they change their society to give men equal access to power. And Ken isn't homeless by the end of the movie. Again, media literacy is something you need to work on.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 11:45 AM
–

Cool story, bro. Look, life is shit, I agree. There are a--holes all over the place. Worse, our society is structured in a way that gives advantages to a--holes (and people with privilege, such as the rich or white men, among others). But you're looking at this the wrong way. You see a handful of weird or bad situations and you extrapolate them to the entire culture; yet the plural of "anecdote" is not "data." Your personal experiences don't tell us what the world is like. If they did, then they…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 11:44 AM
–

. . . damn, dude, that's a helluva way to say "I have poor social skills and people don't like talking to me." 🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 11:25 AM
–

Barbie's message was also directed at men, you ignorant twat. Or did you completely skip the part where Ken pours his heart out and Barbie reassures him that he's good enough as he is? Regarding those other references, 1) the plural of "anecdote" is not "data;" and 2) given your inability to receive an obvious message from the one film, I highly doubt your reading of the others is even remotely close to being accurate. (and nobody gives a shit about awards, dude, people are well aware of how cor…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 11:20 AM
–

The abstract in the first article (a research study) makes no mention of "mass media in general." It's also locked behind a paywall so I can't see anything beyond the abstract. Assuming that the study is entirely above board (which is a stretch at the moment), I can think of at least two or three other social influences which could account for this observed bias. The second article is an opinion piece that references the first article. The author mentions "the media" by claiming that people lear…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 11:16 AM
–

TikTok is the most female dominated social media platform [citation needed] (you're really bad at this, aren't you?)
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 11:04 AM
–

p.s. the plural of "anecdote" is not "data," muh dude. I can think of a dozen movies off the top of my head that depict an American society where Christianity and/or the Bible is outlawed. Does this mean pop culture is obsessed with persecuting Christians? No, it f---ing doesn't, you gawddamn genius, you. When someone asks for a citation to support a claim, you need to bring data. Your personal experiences with social media don't count because you're the one curating them. If you want people to …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 11:03 AM
–

lol! TikTok??? THAT'S your citation? 😂🤣😂 pathetic
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 10:58 AM
–

popular culture, media, politics, etc. promotes relationships and marriage and ignores or even denigrates singleness. First, [citation needed]. Second, so the f--- what? Pop culture and media also promotes using violence to solve our problems; does this mean that all Soldiers are responsible for changing our culture? How many US presidents can you name who were single men? How many can you name who were atheists? What about just being any religion other than Christian? How the f--- is this relev…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 10:48 AM
–

The plural of "anecdote" is not "data," that's why.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 10:40 AM
–

. . . you actually believe that, don't you? 🤨
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 10:39 AM
–

Mass media in general demonizes male sexuality and promotes the idea that all men are disposable pieces of donkey shit who should be glad women even breathe in their presence and apologize for merely existing around them. [citation needed]
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 10:38 AM
–

Yeah, that's fair, "designed" is a bit hyperbolic . . . but I'd be willing to bet that some of the rhetoric was intentionally added by bad actors looking to take advantage of young, vulnerable people. We probably won't ever know, unfortunately, because it's really hard to trace that kind of shit to a point of origin.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 11:30 PM
–

The "red pill" ideology is a scam designed to render the audience emotionally helpless, making them susceptible to being manipulated by grifters and con artists.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 11:16 PM
1

. . . this is absolutely insane. People aren't using "red pill" for serious discussions in real life. It's an internet thing, pure and simple.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 09:34 PM
6

There isn't. "Red pill" rhetoric exists online. People aren't using these terms IRL (and if they do, they signal to everyone around them that they are a weirdo who should be avoided).
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 09:32 PM
1

Have you tried asking women?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 07:49 PM
0

This dynamic reinforces outdated gender roles, placing unfair pressure on men and limiting women's agency. In a world striving for equality, it's important to recognize how these patterns hold us back. Ok. If we're talking about patterns of behavior which hold us back, how about: At this point, we should all be educated about gender equality and gender roles—there are no more excuses for behaving the way women are. The second half of that sentence is you placing the blame for this cultural attit…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 07:22 PM
7

do people in this sub even remotely bother to read? They do not, I'm afraid. It's one of the main reasons the RP ideology keeps drawing people in.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 06:02 PM
4

Seems to me like a lot of people prefer to understand only the strawman versions of these arguments . . .
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 04:33 PM
2

. . . and?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 04:07 PM
0

"Near impossible" is not impossible. Also, psychologists and sociologists have known about the difficulties involved with studying cultural phenomenon for a long time now. That there is a challenge involved doesn't mean that no one has succeeded in overcoming it.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 03:37 PM
1

you're only justifying it's existence, not it's persistence in the modern world where women can get credit cards and be married. . . . I'm sorry, how long do you think it takes people to adjust to a cultural shift? We're talking about a change that happened only 50 years ago. Nothing you said, however, contradicts my point. Your "point" is that women should carry the responsibility for society being the way it is, while men should be allowed to whine and cry about how unfair life is. There's not…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 03:18 PM
1

The paragraph you cited supports the social structure of early human tribes (i.e. a pre-agrarian society), where the men in the tribe tended to view the children as "theirs," instead of "mine." That is to say, when a man can't know for certain that the child isn't his, he's more likely to care for it as though it were his own. This increases the likelihood that a tribe of people will survive and pass on their genes. In other words, you're citing evidence for a communal approach to child rearing …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 03:10 PM
2

Are you going to provide a legitimate citation to support your claims or are you going to continue wallowing in your ignorance?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 02:47 PM
6

"Literalness" in communication has nothing to do with gender or whatever sex organs you were born with.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 02:32 PM
4

. . . wait, you think "twit" means "a person who posts on twitter?" fucking hell, no wonder you twats are red pilled
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 02:31 PM
2

Being "red pilled" is not about "knowledge."
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 02:30 PM
1

. . . you never learned history, did you? this is a societal structure that women do everything they can to maintain. The history of dating in America, as a cultural phenomenon, goes back to the turn of the 20th century. America was transitioning from a mostly agrarian economy to a mostly urban/industrialized economy. This meant people living in cities, usually in tight conditions (such as densely packed apartment buildings), which puts young people into close contact with each other. However, c…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 02:29 PM
3

Nope. That's a meme that some random twit threw together and posted on the internet. You need to bring up, like, actual citations. From reputable sources. Like a scientific study (or several), that sort of thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 02:18 PM
0

. . . you really believe this, don't you? Amazing.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 02:15 PM
4

By that logic, the fact that I've read the Bible makes me a Christian.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 02:14 PM
3

We'll continue to ignore you (like the irritating little child you are).
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 02:10 PM
2

. . . why? I mean, one of the studies you linked seems to draw a connection between a man's conscious desires and testosterone levels in the body. That means it's possible to conduct a study which links a state of mind to a physiological condition. Why can't someone do the same with our perception of respect?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 01:26 PM
2

I've never had this experience when dating. But also, even if this is the norm and my experience was unusual, doesn't this suggest a cultural influence more than anything else? What does dating look like in countries with different views on gender roles?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 01:20 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter