TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Just_Brad Archive

View 6 posts and 124 comments by Just_Brad on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

Because this subreddit devolved into a contest with feminists over who could be the biggest victim.
/r/MensRights11/08/16 01:06 PM
3

An actual term already exists https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuckold
/r/TheRedPill06/08/16 01:36 PM
1

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuckold
/r/TheRedPill06/08/16 01:35 PM
5

Do not link to jezebel Please use this to avoid giving Jezebel ad revenue. Is this satire? I genuinely can't tell anymore.
/r/TheRedPill05/10/14 12:18 AM
3

Don't put Ray Rice's and Adrian Peterson's troubles down to feminism. The way Rice knocked his fiancé out and Peterson whipped his boy to the point of drawing blood would be denounced in any political climate.
/r/TheRedPill04/10/14 06:41 PM
4

Interesting quote, which would have come right near the end of Athenian prominence (post Peloponnesian war). Perhaps there was a particularly quarrelsome Athenian generation at the time Socrates made the comment which led to Athens' fall from power... Regardless though, I think my point stands that the vast majority of generations lived in a virtually identical fashion as the previous generation even if the transmission of moral values between generations was imperfect. The radical changes since…
/r/TheRedPill28/09/14 11:22 PM
17

I've seen variants of this argument applied to many aspects of the change in social mores and behavior over the last 100 years. Frankly, I think it's glib and unsubstantiated. Women's (and men's) undrelying nature has not changed, on that point we agree. However, to say that women's behavior hasn't changed is quite a stretch. Formerly, fathers and husbands kept a much more watchful eye on their women and held authority over them. Because of the change in social mores (which no longer legitimize …
/r/TheRedPill28/09/14 07:34 PM
5

TIL: Sexual dimorphism isn't a thing and it's taboo to suggest that sex has any role to play in mental faculties. This subreddit will censor itself out of existence.
/r/MensRights04/11/13 04:46 AM
1

At 16, you would do well to focus on the self-improvement aspects, but I think TRP really highlights how self-improvement and maximizing your attractiveness go hand in hand. It will also serve you well to be aware of women's true natures instead of the FeminismTM version of what women are like. That certainly doesn't mean being a misogynist, at least not in the true sense of the word (hating women). Women are not bad people, they just aren't like men - and the world would be a worse place if the…
/r/TheRedPill21/08/13 07:52 AM
2

Reminds me of this
/r/TheRedPill21/08/13 06:28 AM
3

Am I the only one who clicks these 'comments illustrate some type of bluepillery' posts only to find balanced discussion in the top comments?
/r/TheRedPill09/08/13 03:10 AM
1

Depends on the moral standard utilized. Losing one's life and ruining two other lives by an optional action whose consequences were easily foreseeable can be considered to be immoral. Action without regard for consequences can typically be regarded as reckless, and willful recklessness can be considered immoral.
/r/TheRedPill16/07/13 09:50 PM
1

Sexual strategy may be amoral, but jealousy and rage on the part of the husband is a foreseeable result from screwing his wife. Alpha/Beta/Delta/AnyGreekLetter can pull a trigger.
/r/TheRedPill16/07/13 05:46 AM
5

A guy acting totally beta getting into a relationship with a fairly hot, small-town TV personality? Is this your friend?
/r/TheRedPill12/07/13 08:41 AM
0

Today, hands down. The level of tech is astonishing and we may become a type 1 civilization within our lifetimes... that is crazy. We may live to see extra-terrestrial bodies colonized, we may find techniques to extend youth, who knows what's around the corner? I am not optimistic that we will do any of those things without a major cataclysm first... but we might. It sucks that western women have essentially been duped into going feral and that the system/blue-pill men will continue to enable th…
/r/TheRedPill11/07/13 05:55 AM
12

Sowell is one of my favorite intellectuals, I really admire his ability and drive to follow the evidence instead of blindly following the prevailing PC culture.
/r/TheRedPill11/07/13 05:09 AM
7

Politicians on the right have said this for 30+ years... granted, I think its just lipservice for the sake of obtaining christian blocks of votes, but it has certainly been said.
/r/TheRedPill09/07/13 11:36 PM
6

Haha, yeah I love when they blame capitalism instead of government corruption. Seems like they never tire of that trope. These corporations are getting special treatment! The government is overlooking and/or enabling their crimes! What we need is more government oversight or direct government control!
/r/TheRedPill21/06/13 10:03 AM
1

Your post: Your #2 is simply false. I never made that assertion, so I'm not going to comment on it. Your second assertion as stated in my post: 2.) All White people view all other races as inferior. Your original comment: I believe that all white people deep down hold this opinion about minorities: that they are inferior. Obviously you did say that, seems strange to deny it. I also never said white people were intrinsically evil. In fact, if anything, I implied that have some degree of altruism …
/r/TheRedPill19/06/13 02:31 PM
2

I have run out of white guilt as well as male guilt. Look at your assertions here: 1.) Black people are intrinsically more altruistic than white people. 2.) All White people view all other races as inferior. Obviously, if you reverse the races, you don't have 7 upvotes and no dissent, you'd be facing a redditorian shitstorm. I'm done with this crap, you can do the liberal mental gymnastics required to get to the conclusion that whites are uniquely evil. They are basically the same contortions ne…
/r/TheRedPill19/06/13 08:30 AM
2

I love that the top-level response is by u/ApatheticHamster
/r/TheRedPill19/06/13 05:23 AM
1

Strictly biological statement of inequality, irrespective of current legal-political-social climate. I wouldn't say it's simply that men > women either... just that for attribute x, men > women and for attribute y, women > men.
/r/TheRedPill15/06/13 04:43 AM
2

I agree. I've posted in MR a bit, even had egalitarian leanings. Now, I don't... now I believe that egalitarianism is a dream based on faulty premises. Men and women are not equal, regardless of the individual's expectation/desire. It's been an interesting transition for me. I now see my blue pill leanings as the basis for all my failed, fucked up relationships, based on inaccurate expectations I carried from years of feminist-influenced indoctrination. I don't know if I'll ever be better, but a…
/r/TheRedPill11/06/13 10:01 PM
3

Fair enough, I understand your point. I wasn't even considering her or her motives in my previous posts. I do believe that the optimal moral compass accounts for hypergamy and provides hedges against it's destructive effects.
/r/TheRedPill31/05/13 09:07 PM
2

I don't understand. One the one hand, you acknowledge men's superior moral agency. On the other, you deny that OP is in any way responsible for fostering a woman's self-destructive behavior. In the end, I think you are just paying lip service to the responsibility which comes with higher moral agency. Clearly, he has done nothing illegal or worthy of legal punishment. However, OP is guilty of enabling immoral and self-destructive female behavior. I don't believe that the ideal of the 'alpha' mal…
/r/TheRedPill31/05/13 08:15 PM
-1

I find this incompatible with much of the writing here in trp. The idea of her being a 'big girl' is incompatible with women's need for a strong man who keeps her safe and limits her own self-destructive behavior. The idea of an adult woman having the same moral agency as a man (and hence being a 'big girl') runs counter to this notion. I don't believe you are doing yourself any favors by nurturing a woman's self-destructive behavior (cheating on her boyfriend), especially when you don't take an…
/r/TheRedPill31/05/13 07:38 PM
6

I agree that it might not be the definition of "red pill". I was having a whiskey before going out earlier (after lurking around here a bit) and I just thought it fits here. My mom also forced blue pill shit on me from a fairly early age, although my dad was present. He was thoroughly indoctrinated with blue pill nonsense as well; I really hated the way he capitulated to my mom. She was the boss, which I found revolting (and thankfully, now I understand why I found it to be so disgusting). But I…
/r/TheRedPill31/05/13 08:43 AM
10

I don't see a problem with requesting a female roommate in an ad for a roommate. That's a matter of preference for the person with a room to rent and, whatever their reason, they are well within their rights.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 08:56 PM
2

No legal repercussions, but years of internalization of the feminist message were not good for my psyche. Happy to have taken the red pill.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 07:20 PM
6

That is by far one of the best articles I've read on gender relations in quite some time. Bravo!
/r/MensRights30/03/13 11:50 AM
6

disclaimer: I do not speak for the MRM My answers: What are goals of this movement? Broadly and specifically (in terms of legislation, etc etc)? How would you like people to perceive the movement? 1.) A refinement or complete overhaul of existing family court system to end the systematic disenfranchisement of fathers. 2.) An end to the incentives for women who divorce without cause. Currently, women can basically take everything from a man in the divorce (including long-term maintenance) and the…
/r/MensRights30/03/13 07:55 AM
0

Psuedo-psychological bullshit. Any basis for that thinking? I would love to see a cite (from an actual psychologist) about how one's phallus relates to: A.) a car B.) a gun or C.) any other object that feminists and their ilk have been sniggering about for the last 30 years
/r/MensRights18/03/13 10:27 PM
1

I agree, there are a laundry list of real issues, but IMO this is just fluff. IMO, MRM will stagnate and turn into a twin sister of feminism if the MRM fails to concentrate on real harms from policy and the framework said policy was developed under.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 09:03 PM
-12

Advocating for male genocide... nope Advocating for female affirmative action... nope Advocating for further feminization of acedemia... nope Talking about wanting to get laid a little more although her boyfriend seems mildly less horny... yep Men's Rights issue... nope.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 12:09 AM
1

If you think making up words like 'mansplaining' is crap, then making up words like 'femsplaining' is equally crap. Just call a spade a spade.
/r/MensRights04/03/13 07:27 PM
1

/thread
/r/MensRights27/02/13 09:05 AM
5

Good. If this were even 1 year ago, that comment would have been met with lolcoasters of 'what about teh menz' type bullshit and downvoted into obscurity.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 08:51 PM
1

You're right, McKinnon's quote merely equates intercourse with rape, leaving it possible that the women is entirely fabricating the incident. However, if intercourse occured at all, she does basically equate it with rape. You can provide quotes/cites with respect to the subject matter, which you finally did in this post. Throwing out names of people who never said XYZ, is an unreasonable method of argument. I could not know if that is true except if I read and memorized their works in their enti…
/r/MensRights01/02/13 04:59 PM
0

Great, more names. How about a quote or something to back the position? Something explicitly denying what the McKinnon quote said? You have no idea what I'm talking about... let me be explicit. You cite McKinnon as saying McKinnon didn't say that. in you earlier post. Delunks917 finds a quote showing that SHE DID SAY THAT. You throw her under the bus and throw out more names but no quotes or counter-cites.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 01:31 AM
0

That's one more quote than you've provided. All you've done is throw out names and left the onus on us to do the research.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 01:28 AM
1

How small does the circle of true feminists have to get? You cited MacKinnon and then through her right under the bus immediately. If we do this tedious research, aren't you just going to throw all the "extremists" under the bus?
/r/MensRights31/01/13 11:46 PM
2

You hit a big one: disparate and unfair treatment in divorce courts. This incentivizes divorce for the ex-wife far too much under the current system. Other major ones include the feminization of the educational system which has resulted in a dearth of male students at the college level. Disparate spending on women's health issues at the federal level, despite men's lower life expectancy, is an issue. Domestic violence laws which do not account for reciprocal violence or female aggression are unj…
/r/MensRights28/01/13 08:13 PM
3

Fourth-ed? That's my prefered label as well: MRA-leaning egalitarian.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 12:12 AM
1

I completely agree. I only care about the legal and educational policies which are demonstrably unjust and harming men/boys.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 09:29 PM
2

Derp.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 10:48 PM
1

I know you didn't, but another guy responding to the same comment was being pretty douchey.
/r/MensRights22/01/13 06:10 PM
1

The individual can reject women; you're a free man. As a society, culture and species however, it will never happen. We can reject feminism and all that it has wrought but we can't reject the female of the human species! I personally would never support a movement which totally vilifies either men or women, to do either is misanthropic in my opinion (hence my strong opposition to feminism). I can hardly believe such a simple statement would get me called a "mangina".
/r/MensRights22/01/13 03:06 AM
2

I think so man, the relationship sounds dysfunctional. Please do look out for yourself.
/r/MensRights21/01/13 12:02 AM
1

Honestly, please get out. I believe that is your only option here; it sounds like potential Borderline Personality Disorder. I may be wrong and I'd encourage you to do your own research and make your own evaluation. Definitely DO NOT throw it in her face if you do think she has a personality disorder but DO distance yourself and be safe.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 11:16 PM
-8

Haha fuck you douche
/r/MensRights20/01/13 07:18 AM
-2

I know what you're saying and I agree to a certain extent. However, the post and cited article was about complete gender separatism. I can't get on board with that. Man and woman share a fate, we are inextricably woven together. As man without woman is lost, woman is lost without man; to hate one is to hate both. It was wrong of feminists to tear at that bond. It would be wrong to aid them in its complete eradication.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 06:25 AM
2

I'm mad for hyperbole.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 05:11 AM
1

NONONONONONONONONONONONONO I don't agree. Don't get me wrong, I am absolutely unwilling to compromise on the facts and truth of what has been going on for 40 years (since there is no middle position between the truth and propaganda). I would be happy if the truth became a part of the popular narrative, activist judges/attorneys were disbarred for willful subversion of justice and misandrist laws were overturned. I don't think the movement is over until these goals are accomplished. In the end th…
/r/MensRights20/01/13 03:59 AM
9

Men's right's issue? No way, this is celebrity piffle; it's nothing more than inconsequential noise.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 03:46 AM
3

Well, if the write-ups were to lead to termination or denial of advancement opportunities, you would be the victim of reverse sexism. Not sure how seriously reverse sexism would be taken in court, however.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 03:41 AM
1

sounds about right haha
/r/MensRights20/01/13 02:33 AM
7

If a woman gets drunk and has regrettable sex with another woman, who is the rapist? Is it: A.) The woman's nearest male neighbor? B.) The woman's landlord (if male)? C.) The bartender (if male)? or D.) The Patriarchy!
/r/MensRights20/01/13 01:42 AM
1

Seems odd that you can attribute a cause to the statistic (I've seen that one too fwiw)...
/r/MensRights20/01/13 01:16 AM
1

Couldn't agree more; I prefer to meet at a coffee shop for a first date in particular.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 01:14 AM
2

No True Scotsman
/r/MensRights20/01/13 01:10 AM
1

I'll preface this by saying that the language in the following link can be blunt and off-color. However, I agree with the sentiments conveyed entirely, so I think its the best thing to post in reference to your definition of "feminism". AVfM article: To the nice feminists
/r/MensRights20/01/13 12:59 AM
1

That's cool, info not in your original cite. It you're going to cite it, would you please make it available for an independent reading?
/r/MensRights20/01/13 12:46 AM
2

Ya, sorry, I read it in an earlier cite in this thread.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 12:28 AM
1

That looks like a great idea.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 12:27 AM
7

Just tell us what you think. I don't have a really good guess, maybe taking 45 minutes to fix her makeup and look attractive? IDK, just share your opinion please.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 12:24 AM
10

Actually, they were compelled to change their advertisement, which I think is much worse than showing a boy playing with a car or a girl playing with a doll.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 11:03 PM
13

Avoid all adhesives when under the influence, just to be on the safe side.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 11:07 AM
3

Electrical Engineer, got my BSEE awhile back.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 11:00 AM
8

Lame. I'm sorry to hear that but, as an EE that's been working for 5.5 years in my field, your first job is what's really important. I never had an internship, I just worked regular jobs in the summer. I got my first job after a 6 month job search and actually got to pick from 3 offers. Just keep killing it at school and be professional/productive when you do get that first job. Affirmative action can get an unqualified engineer in the door, but it's corporate suicide to keep them on. Unqualifie…
/r/MensRights19/01/13 10:29 AM
5

The word rape has a hell of a lot of power in our culture, and people (including victims) are loathe to apply it in all sorts of cases, even for really blatant rapes. Yeah, I agree. But there is one group that throws that word around wantonly and in bad-faith. You get one guess as to which group I'm referring to.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 09:26 AM
4

That's not what your cite says. The abstract states that: Results showed that whereas acknowledged victims reported more symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder, acknowledgment status did not add to the prediction of posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms in a model including assault violence and other important predictors of these symptoms. This statement says that acknowledgment DID correlate to PTSD symptoms, not that The direct relationship between PTSD symptoms and acknowledgement status …
/r/MensRights19/01/13 09:18 AM
3

Demonizing white males... SO BRAVE! The role mental illness played in this (on the part of son and mother) is unbelievably obvious and yet this douche wants to stand on the corpses of children for his agenda with respect to gender politics. Fuck that guy.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 03:26 AM
1

Ya, that's pretty sick - gross hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights18/01/13 03:45 AM
7

A little too melodramatic for me. Check that, way too melodramatic for me. How about just call a shaming tactic for what it is: an attempt to silence the speaker without addressing the substance of what has been said.
/r/MensRights18/01/13 03:22 AM
2

It is real relationships in the here-and-now that matter to children. Biology comes a distant second. This kind of thing annoys me: it would be appalling to learn that you had been cuckolded for 20 years. This guy has a lot of nerve to make this emotional appeal in the face of such a clear wrong against the man.
/r/MensRights18/01/13 02:55 AM
0

I despise Saul Alinsky. His work was dead on, an awful accomplishment.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 09:47 PM
6

Using executive orders to limit or defy an amendment is troubling enough on its face. But then again, the tenth has been hallowed out for almost 100 years - the second is just more contentious and fundamental.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 07:37 AM
8

Not the point; girl did nothing wrong - uncool bro shames op for not dancing with her.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 07:33 AM
9

You don't have to, but whatever. Kinda sounds like she was being sweet, if somewhat overbearing. But ya, tell uncoolest to shove it. Something along the lines of, "Bro, Bro, I don't take orders from you Bro" oughta do it.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 07:30 AM
2

Honestly, this. They are caught in their dogma and cannot bear to have it challenged. Find better people to hang out with.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 07:25 AM
1

baaa-zing!
/r/MensRights16/01/13 04:00 AM
1

So true. There are stilted laws, a biased educational system, BS quotas and a truly unjust family court system, but oppression? No, we are mostly free to do as we please.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 07:31 PM
7

Non-issue IMO; actual media biases exist, no need to blow your top over how you think a media might portray this if the genders were flipped. First sentence, "A woman stole an empty commuter train from a depot Tuesday and drove it to a suburb of Stockholm where it derailed and slammed into an apartment building, officials said."
/r/MensRights15/01/13 06:55 PM
0

IN THIS COMMENT: one person disregarding the documented attempts at legitimate discourse with feminists. Silencing and shaming tactics are the opposite of the message - decades of that type of behavior can't be ignored.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 12:56 AM
4

Seriously. I don't know how different Canadian law is from American law, but I would think you could easily win and you should have the paper trail to prove it too. I'm rooting for you to get your reputation back and to be justly compensated for the clear libel against your name.
/r/MensRights11/01/13 07:05 AM
11

Word. This proves jack shit and harmed no-one.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 11:44 PM
1

I love Aesop Rock - I'm gonna download some for my phone now!
/r/MensRights09/01/13 07:32 AM
1

haha, that's exactly what I thought.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 06:53 AM
0

Feminism: the application of Marxist dialectics to gender relations. Men's Rights Movement: a reaction to gender-based injustice created by the government's application of Marxist dialectics to gender relations.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 04:12 AM
2

I understand, however, attitudinal change and harm from attitude is non-tangible and therefore not something we can focus on. Policy, research and research methodology critiques are tangible and therefore should be the focus. I'm just saying, lets NOT talk attitudes and opinions first; lets keep the focus on the demonstrable harms. Attitudes will change as long as we keep showing facts and real harm from real policy - if we go the other way around, we will get bogged down in soupy semantics and …
/r/MensRights09/01/13 12:36 AM
1

The article says they need a positive male role model - masculinity itself is... I don't know what it means to you, but I don't buy the version that the American media has been pushing on us either. I say that your definition of masculinity is your own by birthright. To me, well, it's purpose leading motion, action following intent, will imposed on flesh; it's the intersection of the abstract and the concrete. It's limitless possibility in finite, fragile form.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 09:32 AM
2

He's not saying the excess video games are a cause, he's saying they're a symptom.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 09:02 AM
2

He's saying the addiction itself is a symptom.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 09:00 AM
2

...I have no idea where you get that from the article you link to.
/r/MensRights05/01/13 04:55 AM
2

Great post, needs move love.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 03:16 AM
2

That one is much better. The first one is just terrible though. This was just a batshit comment from a non-prominent voice. Some of the other batshit stuff that has come from feminists had the rough equivalence of a cardinal's word or a respected minister's sermon (eg. from PhDs).
/r/MensRights30/12/12 04:01 AM
7

Wrong on the kkk thing; terrible analogy. I'm not sure if a feminist wrote this, but it is batshit crazy (I'm sure we can agree on that). Being a feminist, like being a member of the kkk, is a choice (unlike being a white person). If you are hearing batshit crazy logic, lies and hate-speech a lot from your self-chosen peer group, maybe the peer group sucks.
/r/MensRights30/12/12 12:35 AM
1

I blame feminists for a few harms in our culture, none of them being on that list. I blame them for pervasive anti-male bias in schools, beginning with primary school. I blame them for a totally stilted, unjust family court system. I blame them for fostering a culture of hate and fear against men via knowing falsehoods. I think that's plenty right there. The shrill man-hating lies are bad enough, that those lies were and still are being acted upon by policy makers is goddamn shameful.
/r/MensRights29/12/12 10:40 PM
5

Politically influential liars who are shielded from censure are dangerous to the rights of everyone.
/r/MensRights29/12/12 10:59 AM
3

Damn dude, are both the biological mother and the child wards of the state? For fucks sake. There should be some kind of legal recourse for this guy, but it seems that this should be a cautionary tale for would-be sperm donors.
/r/MensRights29/12/12 04:10 AM
4

Also, so many people make the fallacious Argument to moderation in order to call for some molification of both sides. Assuming that an unproven middle position between feminists and MRAs is likely the best position doesn't let you see just how deep the lies upon lies go. Feminism has been corrupt for about 40 years; its bad data on top of bad assumptions topped with intellectual dishonesty.
/r/MensRights26/12/12 07:29 PM
6

Hi tw00012, good to see some questions from a questioning feminist. My responses: 1.) I have no empirical data to defer to, nor personal experience to refer to, so I would have to refrain from comment. 2.) I think that male and female professionals in the area of treating sexual trauma could be equally effective, although calibrating for any trauma-inflicted fears would necessitate both IMO (eg. a male on female rape victim who feels afraid of men should be treated by a female). 3.) Technically …
/r/MensRights23/12/12 03:22 AM
15

To me, I'm kind of baffled that actual rape victims/survivors aren't incensed by what feminists say. They equate innocent behaviors with rape... I would think that would be offensive to a rape victim.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 08:19 PM
3

Word. Red-pill females give me some hope for the future.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 07:46 PM
3

Not at all.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 07:41 PM
1

I hope you're right; half the reason I was pushing for documents is because this does seem like the perfect shit-storm, too perfect. If true, however, this is outrageous and I would totally be willing to do something about it. What a waste of time though. The MRM has a lot of legit and salient points and you aren't a serious threat, a speed bump at best.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 06:17 PM
2

Bizness gonna Biz
/r/MensRights22/12/12 10:16 AM
5

Serious? I could never speak calmly to this woman, her very presence would make me disgusted. She doesn't deserve this man's empathy. You have nothing to say to her that a lawyer can't say better IMO.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 09:36 AM
4

I would just like to know what testimony was offered. So if you have a transcript among your documents, I would like to read it. I'm shocked that the judge would disregard your primary therapist without a compelling reason to do so, especially for the sake of the children.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 09:23 AM
8

Really? I've never heard of one that was this bad.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 08:52 AM
3

Good God. What was the judge's name? Is this a matter of public record? How about the proceedings? I would like to see a copy if possible, although I can't be any sort of legal aid.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 08:33 AM
3

I agree, the facts must come out. This is insanity, gross - this should be offensive to any reasonable person's conscience. At bare minimum, the children should be removed from this home on the therapist's word alone, immediately.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 08:00 AM
17

You're welcome. This is a horrible miscarriage of justice, nothing would make me happier than to hear that it was set right.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 07:48 AM
30

Can we call for peaceful protest on this? Would it be legal to picket your house and the courthouse on any court dates you might have?
/r/MensRights22/12/12 07:18 AM
1

I'm afraid you'd sooner find a "true Scotsman" living cheerfully under English rule than a "true feminist" advocating for actual equality. The definition of a "true feminist" is hardly up to you, or to me, for that matter. However, if there is any definition of feminism which should be given more weight, that definition clearly belongs to the scholarly voices and the prominent political voices. Even though your version sounds a hell of a lot more reasonable, you have no credentials nor a bully p…
/r/MensRights20/12/12 06:31 PM
2

Sorry, but I think "slut" is also pejorative because women are not supposed to enjoy sex. The paradox is that if they didn't they wouldn't have to be shamed. I have no idea who these people are that do all this supposing that women aren't supposed to enjoy sex, because media and advertising messages have NOT SAID THAT EVER IN AMERICA. More likely your whole narrative is a traditional feminist shock-horror vignette about how evil old society has tricked women but that courageous feminists have sm…
/r/MensRights20/12/12 07:58 AM
8

I agree, citizens should be equals under the law.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 07:21 AM
2

No I didn't use that language and I don't accede to the equivocation; in fact there was nothing about 'taking it' or 'manning up'. I'm saying that its not an injustice, even if you can build a case for it in court. Putting these women in highly visible positions is probably justifiable from a business perspective and even if it weren't, the business owner should have every right to make dumb decisions. I have a hard time believing that using the justice system for political activism (regardless …
/r/MensRights20/12/12 01:16 AM
3

God damn it. Do you really want to emulate feminists? I hate this overly-ligitegious crap. I hate that people seem to think they have a 'right' to a job or promotions or whatever. We (as a nation) might, MIGHT, be able to pull America out of its nose-dive, but not by emulating the tactics of those who have damn near paralyzed our instituations.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 11:18 PM
2

I understand your criticism, however, I would encourage you to do some reading on the bio-chemical basis for pair bonding in humans. Not surprisingly, the bio-chemistry works slightly different in male and female brains. Female brains, however, have a harder time resetting to the "able-to-pair-bond" state in women with a string of multiple partners and a history of promiscuity. The good news, however, is that both male and female brains CAN reset! It requires a period of abstinence, but its enti…
/r/MensRights19/12/12 06:49 PM
4

That's the rub. Is it "fair"? No. Is it a sound business decision? Probably.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 06:04 PM
1

1000% agree. Leave the hysterical left to punish business owners for making business decisions (sorry, but for a high visiblity position in a bar, sexy women are obviously in the business' best interest). It's not "fair" but we damn sure better not be trying to enforce that kind of "fairness" (against the business' best interests) while also bemoaning when more qualified males are passed over in other areas (which would also be against the business' best interests except for subsidies and tax in…
/r/MensRights19/12/12 05:51 PM
4

That makes the most sense by far. Honestly brother, this is not the hill to die on. This is not exactly "fair" but its not government mandated either - its a business decision. You're going to lose and look like a prat if you push on this.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 05:35 PM
1

Feminism is faulty at its foundation because it starts with a theory then seeks out facts to prove it. That's not bad methodology, really. Start with hypothesis, then seek to prove/disprove by evidence/experiment. Nothing wrong with that. It's fabricating facts to fit the theory that is feminism's worst offense. Its been shown that many "facts" advanced by feminists are, in fact, wholesale fabrications. Any other serious field of inquiry, if an expert is shown to have fabricated supporting evide…
/r/MensRights03/08/12 04:07 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter