TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

JustthenewsonCS Archive

View 2 posts and 16 comments by JustthenewsonCS on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
30

Its a combination of the state not wanting to pay for a woman's kids and also a system that allows for and protects cheating women (and cheating men for that matter who don't marry and cheat with others wives). In fact indirectly promotes it by removing the consequences of it. Basically, the government doesn't want to pay for the womans cheating, so dumps that burden on the man in the marriage instead and makes him foot the bill. Then, it also is protecting women over men because that society de…
/r/MensRights18/09/23 09:28 PM
1

I mean, yes it is a one day acccount. But I mean an account has to start somewhere. They don't look like a spambot. Most bots wouldn't post paragraphs about Bible verses.
/r/MensRights13/08/22 05:02 AM
12

I do not care about subs that hate on men So you proved the point then. You only care about subs that you perceive as hating on women. You ignore the subs that hate on men. To be clear, I don't think this sub hates women, although I am sure there are exceptions. I do think that it hates on third wave feminism and modern culture though, but is that not justified? Third wave feminism and modern society says women don't have to sign up for selective service but a guy does, it says its ok that divor…
/r/MensRights13/08/22 04:55 AM
1

Also, OP, do you go out of your way to make these posts on all the other subs that regularly hate on men? How long does your post stay up if so?
/r/MensRights12/08/22 11:37 PM
1

Post "study" with this: based on research with 175 young women and nonbinary people in the UK. Then says this: It's not a proper scholarly "study". It's just a statistic from a dating website. Calling it a "study" is an insult to actual researchers. Ok lol.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 11:36 PM
1

Again, that's only because men rate women based on the photos they submitted, in which women are often caked in makeup and the photos themselves are heavily photoshopped unlike the photos submitted by men. No, that is a reason you are making up to justify the difference. Also, where are you seeing guys putting on a lot of make up out in the real world? What's there to "justify" here? I'm only talking about how data can be interpreted. No, you are making up reasons to make the study seem less bad…
/r/MensRights12/08/22 08:38 PM
1

They are charged with lesser because the prosecutor won’t charge for what the crime actually is. The problem starts with the prosecution and the system.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 05:39 PM
1

It’s not, the OKCupid evaluation showed men rated women on a normal bell curve, as would be expected. Your justifying something that isn’t justifiable, but I expect nothing less from Reddit.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 05:37 PM
1

There is a difference between one night stands and relationships and you are confusing the two. Many guys will have sex with women they won’t be in relationships with. However, that is usually not true for women. Women often confuse this one night stand as meaning guys like that guy will be in a relationship with them. So they go for those guys who have zero interest in being in a relationship with them. This is possibly partially why you see stats like Okcupid showed where women rate 80% of men…
/r/MensRights12/08/22 05:22 AM
2

Nah, studies have shown women are regularly given lesser charges AND less time than men for the same crimes. Just another example of sexism in the court system.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 03:04 AM
2

Same justice system that decided she was to get 100% custody of the kids “for reasons”. Almost like deciding who gets custody shouldn’t be defaulted to the woman, since you know that is sexist and also wrong. Also wouldn’t be shocked if same court system will require him to pay her child support while she is locked up as well.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 03:03 AM
1

I’m going to say it and I already know Reddit and social media are in denial about this. There are going to be a lot of single women in the next 10 to 20 years who can’t find someone to marry and it’s going to be a “crisis”. Mostly will be happening in western countries. The amount of options women have been given through dating apps and social media, combined with a culture that does not value settling down or forming families, will cause a lot of people problems in the near future.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 02:51 AM
1

Why is something like this removed? I show it being allowed in the past this year and not against the rules.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 11:16 PM
1

Where is evidence it increases it? Only studies I’ve seen have shown it has no effect on it or negligible that it’s not measurable difference. Some theories say it may decrease estrogen…but that is just a theory and hasn’t been studied enough. Where are you seeing it increased any? What studies? Really would like to know.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 11:15 PM
1

The point you bring up is exactly what someone could attempt to bring up in court when a company denied them that payment for what you describe. To be clear, I’m not against abortions right now. But it’s a valid case of possible discrimination. Also, transgender issues come to mind too. If a female to male transitioned adult had a pregnancy, identified as a male, then how does that fit into things too? Since they identify as male and got the payment, how do you deny some biological male from get…
/r/MensRights25/06/22 11:01 PM
1

Yep, this is the real reason. Companies both eliminate maternity and paternity leave, keep production up, and also get a good PR ad all at the same time. I’m not anti abortion to be clear either. But it’s pretty obvious this is not all just good faith by companies and anyone who thinks it is, is naive as hell lol.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 10:56 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter