TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

K1NTOUN Archive

View 0 posts and 174 comments by K1NTOUN on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

Star Trek was decent at best. It was pretty much a generic action flick. Not much thought involved.
/r/MensRights04/08/16 09:33 PM
-1

You're a liar. I don't know why anyone would lie about something that is so clearly bullshit, but hey, I just have to remember half the population has a less than average IQ and then I understand where you're coming from.
/r/MensRights03/08/16 07:22 AM
-1

As I've already said, they are not the same type of nerve ending as on the glans. And again, are you circumcised? Obviously, because you have no idea what you're talking about. The nerve endings on your foreskin are the same as the type on your fingers. You're arguing that if you had no dick, you could cum from rubbing your fingers together. And you're calling me "thickie"?
/r/MensRights03/08/16 05:44 AM
1

They previously used sex to their survival advantage. Now they use it for advantage in society as a whole. I don't think both sexes desire for more long term sexual relationships are "natural". Our upbringing has the largest affect on our being. Twin studies are the most interesting. One twin can have gender dysphoria and identify as the opposite sex, while the other remains their birth gender. One twin can become homosexual, the other straight. We are a product of childhood influences. As child…
/r/MensRights03/08/16 12:10 AM
1

Articles like this are the best example of the generational divide between boomers and gen x and millenials. The mere mention of porn having an affect is so easily dismissed by older folks. They really just don't get it. They had access to their dad's playboys and they think this is the same thing as a 12 year old watching every perverted sexual act under the sun for years before they are expected to be sexual with girls. This undoubtedly is the biggest factor in my opinion. Women once were the …
/r/MensRights02/08/16 11:04 PM
1

Yeah, things like this are really disheartening. I remember in grade 2 arguing with my teacher about geosynchronous orbits. She couldn't believe it was possible. I still remember how angry she got at me questioning and correcting her. Grade 2! Star Trek taught me, and inspired me to learn, more about science than my entire stay in elementary school!
/r/MensRights02/08/16 08:59 PM
2

Ugh, and I thought my teachers had failed me. I guess I should be grateful to them after reading your posts. I'd have never imagined some people had it much, much worse. Thanks for exemplifying the problem with such poignancy.
/r/MensRights02/08/16 08:26 PM
3

I'm amazed you were able to write so much and essentially relate nothing but a series of childish ad homs. Bravo. You sure showed me.
/r/MensRights02/08/16 08:06 PM
3

The truth hurts, apparently. I don't even know what "misplaced hatred and ego" could possibly mean in this context. You're a prime example of how the modern education system has completely failed men.
/r/MensRights02/08/16 07:50 PM
-1

You should contact some medical professionals, I'm sure they would love to do a study on you.
/r/MensRights02/08/16 07:45 PM
1

Yes, it gives them more legitimacy in their demented minds. This doesn't make him wrong. It makes him even more right.
/r/MensRights02/08/16 12:13 AM
28

There will be no end to the grrrl-power reboot. The success of Star Wars TFA has ensured there will be many more to come. I thought it was one of the worst movies I've ever seen and the feminist agenda was all over it. Yet even on these boards it has defenders. It boggles my mind. The new Rogue One will also probably be very profitable continuing the decline of modern cinema.
/r/MGTOW01/08/16 06:38 PM
1

Oh I know. I see it often and it always disgusts me. If women are so independent and "equal," why the hell are they still clamoring about what we can do for them? Just more insanity from the modern feminist.
/r/MensRights01/08/16 06:36 PM
10

Actually, no. Your attitude of indifference is how feminism was able to get to where it is presently. They don't give a damn about men or men's rights. Equality means nothing to them. It's merely a buzzword they use. Modern feminism is one group that can be completely generalized because they are all the same. There are no levels of feminism. You either accept the doctrine or you don't. We don't need men like you. Your attitude just gives them more power to walk all over us. And they will withou…
/r/MensRights01/08/16 06:29 PM
1

Don't get me wrong, I don't believe we have any obligations to women. I think we have obligations to ourselves, however. It becomes difficult to buy all the new video game systems, computer parts, etc. when you have no money because you can't get a job because you didn't do well in school. It is a failure in character in that it harms their earning capability, their real-life success. I couldn't care less about any social obligation to women. Such notions are hilarious to me.
/r/MensRights01/08/16 06:13 PM
1

Haha, no. Just, no.
/r/MensRights01/08/16 06:06 PM
1

What do you mean by too "gynocentric"?
/r/MensRights01/08/16 01:48 AM
4

Most men haven't the slightest clue what's going on around them. This is what's so sad. The only time most men become aware is after it's too late. Men's rights needs to stop playing softball and realize this is a war. We won't win with logic and appeals to female feelings. These creatures don't give a damn about us. Not a damn. I get the feeling reading some messages around here that many people are still trying to remain reasonable and civil. This is where that gets us. It's weakness and these…
/r/MensRights30/07/16 03:53 AM
1

I think modern boys are rebellious. We have to acknowledge the fundamental changes that have occurred in the family unit. Boys weren't always rebellious, but they are now. I agree with your assessment generally, but it leads to my point. Boys don't admire the values modern teacher's possess, because their own worlds are much larger than they used to be. If a 10 year old is more fluent with computers and technology than his teacher, how can he respect her? The landscape of the world has changes, …
/r/MensRights29/07/16 07:02 PM
9

For 100 years fathers existed. Boys knew their place. The problem is we have a generation of boys raised by their mothers. Without the father figure, boys assume a more rebellious mantel as they see themselves as the "man of the house." They no longer can surrender to the female authority figure because they already see themselves as equal to or even above those figures. Even when the father remains present he has been so reduced in his status that kids no longer respect them as they once did. T…
/r/MensRights29/07/16 02:42 AM
1

I think it does. Essentially, the system is already teaching girls what they need to know and how to they need to behave to succeed.
/r/MensRights29/07/16 02:25 AM
6

This is spot on. There is something so alluring about suicide. The massive "fuck you" delivered to every sinister branch of male enslavement this world has, and there are many. But furthermore, the "fuck you" delivered to existence itself. If we're born to procreate, whose dirty work are we doing? So that a super race 1000 years from now gets to live forever in infinite health and peace? Fuck them. The thought of erasing myself from the universe and laughing at the very meaning of life is very a…
/r/MGTOW28/07/16 12:32 AM
8

I think the problem is simply girls do what they're told and boys don't. If boys are told to learn about Egyptian gods they simply don't care. It's boring and irrelevant to their lives. It really is a complete waste of time and they will undoubtedly forget it all within a year. Girls don't access things like this. You told them to learn it, so they will learn it. You are the authority and they are the subordinates. Boys don't respond to authority in the same manner. They are fundamentally rebell…
/r/MensRights28/07/16 12:12 AM
31

I was better than girls at all those things they are supposedly "really good" at, and so were most of my friends. I did poorly in school at the end because it bored the hell out of me. It was essentially 2+2=4 for 10 years. I would sit and daydream for hours on end for basically 10 years and was still able to easily pass all my courses with next to no effort or thought. The problem is when it gets tough in the final year of high school I had no work ethic whatsoever. Whereas the girls had no hob…
/r/MensRights28/07/16 12:00 AM
2

"Trump’s support is driven by racism, xenophobia, and other varieties of cultural unease, but it is also a reflection of a lost generation of men, enraged and adrift in an economy where a college degree is one of the few dependable life rafts." The author loses most of his credibility almost instantly. Firstly by promoting idiotic MSM lies about Trump. Then by claiming a college degree is a dependable life raft. This author is uninformed to put it mildly. "Cheap and abundant entertainment anesth…
/r/MGTOW26/07/16 11:53 PM
1

Yeah, who would look at the wikipedia page directly references our discussion, right...? Let's roll with removing the glans. Do people without penises orgasm? No. Why not? Their fingers are sensitive, right? They still have brains, right? Are you cut? I just can't imagine an uncut person making such an argument. My foreskin is like most other skin. My glans is so sensitive to friction I could barely get a BJ without it hurting when I was younger. It still is if I go without sex for a while. Try …
/r/MensRights26/07/16 09:44 PM
1

"The frenulum was reported to be cut in 26.7%, 20%, and 33.33% of circumcised patients in various surveys" It was at the bottom. I guess that makes it hard to find? Your reference doesn't give any figures on percentages of frenulums removed. It was merely dealing with situations where it was removed. And no, your second statement is actually something I've addressed. The types of neuroreceptors you've mentioned, Meissner's, are the same type, not akin, to those that are found on your fingers. Th…
/r/MensRights26/07/16 09:09 PM
1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frenulum_of_prepuce_of_penis#cite_note-pmid2305537-9 That links to a couple surveys if you want to pay for them. I'm interested where you're getting your data that they are all removed? And no, I've pretty well addressed them. Nerve endings are a two way street. All mental sexual stimulation will excite those nerves. Even during a wet dream those nerves are firing on your glans and corona causing an orgasm. All orgasms are the result of the stimulation of that type …
/r/MensRights26/07/16 08:28 PM
1

I've already addressed most of your points in my other posts. And no, the frenulum is removed in less than 30% of circumcisions.
/r/MensRights26/07/16 08:16 PM
1

Of course. I'm not just making this shit up. That's how it works.
/r/MensRights26/07/16 07:52 PM
1

Ugh, so sad.
/r/MensRights26/07/16 07:48 PM
1

Anal stimulation forces blood though the penis stimulating the nerves from inside the penis. And even people that cum hands free are connecting to the nerves on the glans. They are stimulating the same nerves from the opposite direction.
/r/MensRights26/07/16 07:44 PM
2

Haha, does that ever actual upset people? All it arouses in me is pity for you. Please though, up the dosage again.
/r/MensRights26/07/16 07:40 PM
2

Wow talk about waste of time. I'm glad I'm not that bored in life.
/r/MensRights26/07/16 07:33 PM
2

Haha me too. Probably because it's true. But what it takes to keep a wife happy is the problem.
/r/MGTOW26/07/16 07:22 PM
0

We weren't arguing about the frenulum, but the rest of the skin that constitutes the foreskin. When you pull the foreskin back and forth, it typically slides over the glans and corona and frenulum, which causes an orgasm. The foreskin itself, that skin which is being physically moved, doesn't directly cause stimulation of the sort that causes orgasm. Also, while being very sensitive, not all men orgasm from frenulum stimulation alone. It is still skin, while being extremely sensitive, does not c…
/r/MensRights26/07/16 07:18 PM
1

It would certainly not be hard to stimulate that area of the foreskin without sucking the glans. I am absolutely 100% telling you I can't come without glans stimulation, because that's what leads to orgasm, not rubbing the equivalent of your fingers. I'm being argumentative because what you're arguing is nonsense and I want you to know that.
/r/MensRights26/07/16 06:32 PM
1

Well, I think you're right. Why would any man sacrifice his own pleasure? Because many women are programmed to like mutilated genitals. It's the only answer. If most men are willing to give their lives to women, why not through their personal pleasure in as well?
/r/MensRights26/07/16 06:30 PM
4

I'm uncut. I am totally against circumcision. I just want it to be understood what its function is. It maintains the sensitivity of the glans. Removing it dulls that sensitivity. Who would want that?
/r/MensRights26/07/16 06:26 PM
0

This is ridiculous. Why are you arguing this? Are you trying to tell me you would come from someone sucking on your foreskin? It's ridiculous. And what I said is actually scientifically true. They are the exact same type of nerve endings. Do you come while rubbing your fingers together? It's the type of nerve endings on the glans that allow sexual stimulation.
/r/MensRights26/07/16 06:17 PM
-1

Does rubbing your fingers together cause an orgasm? The type of nerve endings on the glans are what cause sexual stimulation leading to orgasm. You could suck on a foreskin all day and nothing would happen.
/r/MensRights26/07/16 06:15 PM
2

The foreskin is not even close to being the most sensitive part of the penis. Its function is to protect the glans, the actual most sensitive part. The nerve endings on the foreskin are like those on your fingers. Take it from an uncut guy, the foreskin does nothing in terms of sexual stimulation. It evolved for protection, nothing more.
/r/MensRights26/07/16 05:37 PM
1

I think it entirely comes from an entire society of people pressuring them. No one feels like they should have organs they've never had. It's entirely societal conditioning. Those trans people you've heard say that were raised in this society, which is why they will say things like that.
/r/MensRights25/07/16 10:32 PM
1

I care because of the reason the person wants SRS. From what I've read, most transgender people want it to feel fully accepted by biological females. They do it to fit into a society that targets and abuses trans women, people who claim trans women are not real women until they mutilate themselves. I think if society wasn't so damn prejudiced against trans people, none of these people would have this surgery done. I'd rather these women accept themselves for what they are, women inside a man's b…
/r/MensRights25/07/16 10:19 PM
1

Adults speak to children in a manner they'll understand. Did you still not understand? Poor kid. And I cited evidence, you even linked it. Poor, poor child. Also, you've misapplied that fallacy to this case. Just FYI.
/r/MensRights25/07/16 09:57 PM
0

I know you are but what am I? Really? Sorry, I don't argue with children. Especially extremely dense ones.
/r/MensRights25/07/16 09:09 PM
1

The inability to orgasm is one of the many reasons suicide rates increase post-op. It's one thing to think you don't need it, but when it's gone forever is something different. This is why I care. And I said a 25% chance of NEVER being able to orgasm.
/r/MensRights25/07/16 09:03 PM
1

Is reading comprehension something you struggle with? Suicide rates are HIGHER for POST-OP mtf transgenders. And no, I don't get to speak for others, but I certainly get to voice my opinion. I don't think children can make such life altering decisions. Especially when a sizeable number of them come to regret it.
/r/MensRights25/07/16 06:50 PM
1

Read my other post.
/r/MensRights25/07/16 06:47 PM
1

I personally find mental abuse as bad as physical abuse. She's attempting to stunt their mental development. She's shown a complete disregard for their well being. It's despicable. Why should she be allowed to be near male children? It's clear she will attempt to mentally abuse them and do it with pride.
/r/MensRights25/07/16 03:55 AM
1

In my thinking, no body parts should get lopped off. And yes, I am telling you without a shadow of a doubt that the glans produces many, many, MANY times the amount of pleasure than that of the foreskin. I don't even consider the foreskin giving pleasure. The type of nerve endings on the foreskin are more akin to those on your fingertips. The foreskin provides protection for the glans. This is why it's so useful and why it evolved.
/r/MensRights25/07/16 12:37 AM
1

There are many types of nerve and nerve endings in the human body. And that figure of 20000+ is not anywhere near a proven fact. There are no confirmed studies in this area. I assume you must be circumcised because no one with an intact penis would argue that the head is less sensitive than the foreskin. The greatest benefit of the foreksin in my opinion is protecting the glans, making it more sensitive. You make it sound like someone would sooner lose the glans of their penis than their foreski…
/r/MensRights25/07/16 12:29 AM
4

She's an attention whore, nothing more. My statement has more evidence than her entire case.
/r/MensRights25/07/16 12:10 AM
12

And it's getting worse every day.
/r/MensRights25/07/16 12:08 AM
0

Not all nerve endings are created equal. The type on the foreskin don't contribute to pleasure on anything close to the scale as the glans.
/r/MensRights25/07/16 12:06 AM
6

All women can orgasm. All women don't know how to orgasm. We're talking about a 25% chance of making orgasm impossible for mtf transgender people. No amount of stimulation will allow it to occur. This is something very different than the female experience.
/r/MensRights24/07/16 11:38 PM
2

Of course it would have an impact. The reason clitoral orgasms are so much more intense is because there are many, many more nerve endings on the clit than on the head of the penis. Disrupting the amount of intact neural pathways would unquestionably reduce the intensity of the orgasm.
/r/MensRights24/07/16 11:36 PM
23

No, something like 75% of post op transgender can experience "orgasm." Or at least that's what they claim. Would you take a 25% chance of never having an orgasm again? Didn't think so. I also wonder how the orgasm compares to an actual intact penis. There must be nerve damage to some degree. I feel many of these post op women are like men who have been circumcised, they don't want to accept they've been broken because they can't change it. Yes, we know transgender people have a higher suicide ra…
/r/MensRights24/07/16 09:02 PM
1

This is one of the most disgusting things I've ever read. This person should be put on a child abuse list and forbidden to come within 100 ft of any child. What a demented mind she must have.
/r/MensRights24/07/16 08:35 PM
89

My biggest problem with this is they are preparing the child to have his genitals removed. This to me is beyond barbaric. They are essentially ensuring this kid will never get to experience an orgasm. It's utterly terrifying. I'm all for trans people, but removing genitals is where I draw the line. It's insanity in my view. Why would you want to deprive someone one of the greatest joys in life before they even get to experience it? Not to mention a study from Sweden notes suicide rates are highe…
/r/MensRights24/07/16 08:30 PM
1

Honestly, what difference does it make? It doesn't make his message any less true.
/r/MensRights24/07/16 03:42 AM
19

Lesbian relationships are the most unstable and violent of all relationships. Let them have each other. They'll all be miserable and I'll probably die from laughter.
/r/MGTOW23/07/16 04:25 PM
3

Is your mother happily married?
/r/MGTOW22/07/16 02:52 PM
1

I think that we should move towards true equality instead and just ban makeup altogether. That would save them some money, no?
/r/MensRights22/07/16 02:20 PM
1

Even married men and men with girlfriends watch a ton of porn. It's because the "real thing" isn't the hyper sexualized creature the media tells us she is. Penetration does nothing for like 80% of women, and the other 20% are lying. As Elaine once said, "fake, fake, fake!" I mean, women can only act for so long before it begins to bore them. I'm beginning to think this is why men in the most successful ancient civilizations were bisexual. Women's true nature wasn't so hard to see back then. Mode…
/r/MGTOW21/07/16 01:13 PM
1

Maybe learn something about the situation before speaking. It would save you from looking like a fool to those that have.
/r/MensRights20/07/16 11:48 PM
0

Milo has done more for men's rights in the last couple years than you will in your entire life. You disgust me.
/r/MensRights20/07/16 05:22 PM
2

This is one of the most embarrassing debates I've ever seen. Pinker uses nothing but scientific analysis and Spelke is essentially using nothing but her subjective opinion given the anecdotal information she's absorbed over the years. I don't know how Pinker does it. She's not anywhere in his league intellectually. He's constantly explaining what seems like basic logic to her. His patience is legendary. He demolished her here. It's sad he's so tactful that she doesn't even fully comprehend that …
/r/MensRights19/07/16 04:49 AM
1

I'm not talking about cheap labor. I'm talking about consumer growth. Companies can't grow if they sell fewer and fewer manufactured goods. The entire stock market would collapse.
/r/MGTOW18/07/16 02:10 AM
6

The problem is the very foundation of capitalism relies on constant population growth. Why do you think the West is suddenly all pro-multiculturalism? The whites ain't having kids anymore and need to be replaced somehow.
/r/MGTOW11/07/16 07:53 PM
2

It's pretty funny when you realize that's all they have. Shame is basically all that is needed to make men slaves. Who needs chains? who needs threat of violence? Simply deploy a bit of basic shame and men will be slaves for life. It's the most pathetic thing I could ever imagine. The programming runs too deep in most people. They can't raise above it and see it for what it is.
/r/MGTOW11/07/16 07:49 PM
11

Depends on how they took care of you.
/r/MGTOW11/07/16 07:47 PM
1

No, it's not true on paper. Women choose different lifestyles. If she wants to address that, then she should say it. Simply commenting on the fact women earn less is still pushing the wage gap.
/r/MensRights11/07/16 07:40 PM
-1

She didn't need to. From that phrasing it means the same thing.
/r/MensRights11/07/16 07:38 PM
1

Yeah, to be honest, I think it's simply because he prefers uncut men. This sort of makes it even more upsetting for me. It makes him sound like a modern American woman.
/r/MensRights11/07/16 12:50 AM
1

Which is why I said "many", not "all."
/r/MensRights11/07/16 12:06 AM
1

Imagine a world where you didn't disagree with me using that word. That's a world where many of these false rape claims don't exist.
/r/MensRights11/07/16 12:01 AM
1

If there is one thing that annoys me, it's when people try to correct others when they have no idea what they're talking about. No, a whore can be someone who sells her body for money, but not always. It's ironic because I've posted the definition just a couple messages ago. Only women can be whores, but its meaning can still be applied to men. It isn't, because men are naturally whorish so it is unnecessary. As to your second point I can only scratch my head. If you don't know that women don't …
/r/MensRights10/07/16 11:53 PM
2

I think what's wrong is the negative connotation of whore. Men are all whores. I'm a whore. Women, in their day to day lives, despise whores. This is why I say they turn into whores, because they do, and because it contradicts the image they like to portray in their day to day lives. If women were more sexually liberated, they would understand that it's no big deal to fool around. Instead, they are taught it is terrible, so women who do drink, and do become inhibited, and do whore around, regret…
/r/MensRights10/07/16 11:30 PM
5

If only you were as interested in the topic as you are other men's sex lives.
/r/MensRights10/07/16 09:07 PM
5

Read the thread maybe? The problem is they don't make the decisions in a sober mindset and hence regret the actions which leads to claims of rape. Thanks for taking an interest in my sex life though.
/r/MensRights10/07/16 08:48 PM
5

Sorry is whores too vulgar? Okay, how about, "women who engage in promiscuous sexual intercourse." Oh wait, that's just the literal definition of whore.
/r/MensRights10/07/16 07:27 PM
6

Who are we kidding? Chicks get drunk and suddenly all their inhibitions are out the window. Girls gone wild anyone? Those aren't unique cases. It's just the way they are. Maybe they don't all want to perform for the camera, but they definitely want someone to play with.
/r/MensRights10/07/16 07:26 PM
1

There have been enough twin studies to show that biology has an influence but homosexuality certainly isn't entirely biology. Evidence suggests it is mainly social from early life events.
/r/MensRights10/07/16 04:59 PM
8

It's always made to sound as though men prey on drunk girls. Like these girls are passed out and men attack. In reality, we all know, women turn into gigantic whores when they drink, and then regret their actions later. This isn't rape.
/r/MensRights10/07/16 03:39 PM
4

Milo says a lot of stupid shit. Like he doesn't think gays should adopt or that trans people just have a mental disease (couldn't homosexuality be looked at in the same way?) His stance on circumcision is also appalling. But he does so many good things, angers so many of the right people, that I have to forgive him these flaws. I don't agree with anyone 100% of the time.
/r/MensRights10/07/16 01:30 AM
1

Haha I don't mind down votes. Most people can't even make a functional argument after getting shot down so they just down vote, usually they have multiple accounts too and spam down vote. They go into post history and down vote old posts that have nothing to do with the thread. Reddit sometimes attracts very immature people.
/r/MensRights08/07/16 04:53 PM
1

So you don't know what off the grid means, yet you want to tell me I can't be off it? Why do the idealistic ones never know what they're talking about? Being connected to society has nothing to do with the "grid." We're talking about taxes and the returned benefits of those taxes, not private industry. I'm not sure if you've simply not read my comments in this thread, but I'm not arguing against all taxation. Taxes are necessary for any society to function. I'm talking about the exorbitant amoun…
/r/MensRights08/07/16 04:50 PM
1

I work entirely online. SEO and design. Every system of my earning process is supported by private industry. The government of course only hinders this process with their ridiculous prevention of competition in telecommunications.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 09:17 PM
1

This really is the crux of the issue, because some people actually believe such nonsense. You are in control of your life, no one else, and only you can change it. Believing anything else is victim mentality which I want no part of.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 09:04 PM
1

What are we arguing about? The freedom to not have to share my wealth with those who have none.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 08:56 PM
1

I find your views extremely ignorant. You're so ready to dismiss my opinion to serve your own ideals. Not everyone shares your ideology. Giving people money to raise them out of poverty doesn't solve the problem or end actual poverty. It's just a bunch of people being given free money. Why would I research how my money helps poor people? My entire point is I don't want my money helping them. People need to learn to help themselves. Why do you then talk about farmers? They are among the most weal…
/r/MensRights07/07/16 08:13 PM
1

Helping people is one thing. Dedicating nearly half your working life's wages to others is something else entirely. I want to enjoy my life, not spend it serving people I'll never even meet who made irresponsible decisions.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 07:53 PM
1

Comparing my situation to the ultra rich is asinine.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 07:36 PM
1

No, I want to find a way to address these problems without me providing nearly half the fruits of my labor. If the rich are so concerned, let them pay for it. They have nearly all of the wealth, after all.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 06:57 PM
1

Helping the poor is something I am very interested in. Giving them free money isn't helping them. Free healthcare, if anything, only contributes to them being poor because they never learn personal responsibility. A child born into poverty still exists in a system where they can attain success if they work hard. The problem is, no one wants to work hard anymore. Everyone wants to play the victim. Which is why we get ridiculous groups like BLM. Being born into an economical disadvantage by no mea…
/r/MensRights07/07/16 06:46 PM
1

I think the onus is on you. How is Canada more free than America?
/r/MensRights07/07/16 06:35 PM
1

No, the problem is the amount. I will never get anything in return, but I have no problem giving to help others, up to a reasonable point.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 06:15 PM
2

How would buying an island in Canada help me?
/r/MensRights07/07/16 06:09 PM
1

Exactly. So we must force people to help others with the threat of jail if they don't. What a wonderful world.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 06:08 PM
1

I'm not debating the necessity of taxes. Of course we need to pay taxes. I'm arguing against the exorbitant amount we've allowed ourselves to be subjected to.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 05:47 PM
2

Incorrect. Even people on minimum wage pay much more than $300 a month in taxes. And I rely on society for much, much less than 99.9999% of the population. If only my taxes reflected this...
/r/MensRights07/07/16 05:40 PM
0

I was whining about the costs? I don't think so. Merely pointing out a fallacious statement. Thanks for your irrelevant input though.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 05:39 PM
-1

No, no you don't.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 05:38 PM
-2

Do you take every comment literally? Obviously it's not a communist country...
/r/MensRights07/07/16 05:37 PM
-2

I wonder if you can even comprehend how irrelevant what you just said was in relation to the post you replied to.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 05:20 PM
-2

This is irrelevant to anything I've said here.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 05:17 PM
0

Foot the bill...? What are you even talking about?
/r/MensRights07/07/16 05:15 PM
0

...why would I want to immigrate in that case? Your attempt at logic is fundamentally flawed.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 05:11 PM
1

That doesn't even mean anything.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 05:08 PM
0

I wonder how much you donate to charity each year? Probably nothing. Your hypocrisy disgusts me.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 05:07 PM
2

I don't believe some people are disadvantaged compared to others "from the get-go." If you can work 8 hours a day, you will make living wage capable of supporting yourself with responsible management. And no shit socialism doesn't equal communism. Communism is a socialist ideology, however. Or did you close the wikipedia window prematurely? Thanks for the "education" though. smh.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 05:00 PM
-2

Communism is a socialist ideology.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 04:57 PM
-1

Actually, you're not free to leave. If I gain citizenship in another country, then I may leave. But it still costs several hundred dollars.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 04:52 PM
4

Fuck all? Hahahahah. Oh wait, you were serious? backs away slowly
/r/MensRights07/07/16 04:44 PM
1

You pay much more than $300 a month for it in taxes. Also, those are your problems, not mine. Why must I share your genetic burden?
/r/MensRights07/07/16 04:35 PM
1

I don't understand, now all of a nation's problems are tax related? Give more to the nanny state and it will save you? And who doesn't "have theirs?" Certainly not people with jobs.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 04:32 PM
3

It's called health insurance.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 04:30 PM
0

Your argument of how giving my money to the government is beneficial for me is that it benefits people other than myself? You're arguing my point; this is communism.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 04:18 PM
4

That isn't "things." That is one thing. And extremely useful? Not in the slightest. The amount of taxes paid in Canada over a lifetime far outweighs the potential costs of a medical problem. I'm not interested in poor people's problems. I'm talking about responsible working adults who can manage their money to prepare for such an event, if it even occurs. Care to name another "extremely useful" thing?
/r/MensRights07/07/16 04:11 PM
0

Care to name some of those extremely useful things? I'm dying to know what they are.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 03:58 PM
1

Canada is a frozen wasteland for half the year. I'd take the Argentinian sun for 10% more taxes. Oh, Canada has free health care. A system you probably won't even use until old age and even then the medical system is so deprived of funding, using a hospital you are likely to get c. diff or some other contagion that will probably outright kill you.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 03:46 PM
3

I think you need to learn the difference between male and female anatomy.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 03:27 PM
-14

Freedom > Communism. For me, anyway.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 03:20 PM
2

You really don't. Factor in sales tax, income tax, property tax, insane taxes on alcohol. The million little fees on everything they've already been taxed for. Even a modest salary is paying at least 35% tax when it's all said and done.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 03:19 PM
-9

Canada is a socialist hellhole. 40% of everything you earn goes to the state. It's borderline communist.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 02:25 PM
21

Lying is a woman's go to method to avoid criticism. They lie several times a day, for the most trivial reasons, simply to avoid conflict. Honesty has no real meaning or value in their minds.
/r/MGTOW06/07/16 01:47 PM
2

So what, it sold 3 or 4 tickets in total? Even a small fan base should have sold out three theaters, if in proper locations.
/r/MensRights06/07/16 01:43 PM
6

Not quite. One man can impregnate many women. Or women can simply use a sperm bank. Men have nowhere near the worth of women in child creation. There is no guarantee whatsoever a man will have children, even if he really wants them. If a woman wants a child, like most of them do, she just needs to head to the local pub one night.
/r/MensRights06/07/16 01:40 PM
2

There were dozens of damning comments that have been deleted just in the last few days. These people disgust me.
/r/MensRights06/07/16 01:31 PM
8

Men don't pop out kids. Capitalism requires growth over all else. Women are the literal gateway to that growth. They will always be worth far, far more than men to the corporate state.
/r/MensRights06/07/16 01:26 PM
1

They will always want the strong minded, because they usually get into top schools and submit completely to the programming. The goal is to filter such people to the top, despite race. They want a global ruling class of the intellectuals and a global workforce of peons.
/r/MGTOW04/07/16 07:55 PM
1

We're entering interesting territory with 3D porn. Soon you'll be able to bang photorealistic celebrities in VR. Who will they sue? Also, we all know Japan's obsession with youth. What about photoreal minors? Interesting times ahead.
/r/MGTOW04/07/16 07:53 PM
7

I live in perhaps the most multicultural country on Earth. Trust me, they not only will, they already do.
/r/MGTOW04/07/16 12:33 AM
9

The goal is for the white people to stop having children. They're too entitled. The third worlders we're importing will work for scraps and be grateful.
/r/MGTOW03/07/16 10:43 PM
10

Strange they are also among the loudest voices in support of multiculturalism in the West, yet Israel is one of the most xenophobic countries on Earth...
/r/MGTOW03/07/16 10:37 PM
1

People have kids because they are told that's the "normal" thing to do and people desire more than anything to be "normal."
/r/MGTOW01/07/16 09:07 PM
1

And people on this forum ask why the west is adopting feminism? Female avarice is what is supporting the entire western corporate capitalist system.
/r/MensRights01/07/16 08:39 PM
1

This is why all civilization is becoming geared towards women. They consume and consume and consume and the corporations profit profit profit. Men are only as good as the amount of money they provide their women to spend.
/r/MensRights01/07/16 08:37 PM
1

Failure to attain what they've been programmed since birth to want, and the artificial shame that comes from that.
/r/MGTOW29/06/16 01:15 AM
8

Yes. Psychology is largely a pseudo-science. Unqualified people making large scale conclusions with primitive data.
/r/MGTOW28/06/16 06:47 PM
1

"a mother type caring women who is constant" ...so you do mean marriage? I disagree with this sentiment despite you not calling it marriage.
/r/MGTOW28/06/16 06:32 PM
2

I deny that it's our biology to want to marry. It's our biology to want to procreate. That has nothing to do with marriage. People like the OP want to marry because, even after everything they've read, it's hard to overcome programming. We're programmed to want to marry, despite how disadvantageous it is to us. I think porn is a great example. Most men rarely jerk to the same video twice. Most men don't even jerk to the same woman more than a few times. If there are thousands of choices, you don…
/r/MGTOW28/06/16 05:57 PM
1

Oh no, ad homs! Always the sign of a great mind...
/r/MensRights27/06/16 12:08 AM
1

Are you still arguing that lesbians exist? Why? The point was merely the thousands of examples of male homosexuality throughout every major western civilization, from art to everyday life. You've managed to point out a myth and a single example that doesn't even provide details of a relationship. One example. In all of recorded history. You're explaining why Milo's tactics annoy lesbians (my argument) and you seem completely oblivious to this. You wikipedia warriors can be so annoying.
/r/MensRights27/06/16 12:02 AM
1

Apeshit? Wow, talk about projecting. Some advice, never attempt to be lawyer. Your debating skills are trash.
/r/MensRights26/06/16 08:46 PM
1

What does it mean? Why don't you tell me? Oh wait, you can apparently only comprehend literal discourse, never mind. No, lesbians aren't mentioned in any Roman texts. Greeks? Lesbos. Again, myth. Is this really all you have? One mythical example? I believe lesbians exist. To argue otherwise is asinine in this day and age with such reasonable people as Camille Paglia. I was simply telling you how Milo argues and why it is effective. You sound like a child when you say a large amount of lesbians a…
/r/MensRights26/06/16 04:35 AM
1

If you don't think I'm capable of thinking carefully, why even respond to me? There are literally thousands of documents of male homosexuality throughout the ages. You can name one example female homosexuality, which I've already said is as much myth as fact, meaning, it's a myth without proof (maybe that wasn't clear to those who claim to think clearly? Strange...) Your second "point" is irrelevant to what I've said.
/r/MensRights26/06/16 03:14 AM
1

The SJW has no idea what they are doing. They literal think it's about peace and love. Little do they know they are the front line soldiers of the corporate state they lament. The goal is no borders, and the SJW is dense enough to believe this means raising up the rest of the world to western standards... when of course that's impossible and the real goal is lowering the west to the lowly level of a third world country.
/r/MensRights25/06/16 05:00 PM
1

Ignorant? You've just pointed to practically the sole example in history and it's as much myth as fact. And those particular lesbians? It seems to be an awful lot. For you to suggest they are just man hating straight women is something I'd consider ignorant.
/r/MensRights25/06/16 04:09 PM
3

Most of his main feminist opponents are lesbians. He says that to slight them. He then uses the fact there is no evidence of lesbian relations throughout recorded history. He also points out the irrational hatred many lesbians have for men, when gay men have no grudge at all against women. It is strange when you meet some of these lesbians and you can just feel the disdain they have for men radiating towards you.
/r/MensRights25/06/16 06:01 AM
7

Is fascism now the status quo in American higher learning?
/r/MensRights22/06/16 12:56 PM
1

Shoe is one of the few people on Earth that gives me hope for humanity.
/r/MensRights22/06/16 03:15 AM
0

I'm sorry, but I disagree. There are no male role models. What kid is going to dress up for Halloween as Finn? Grandpa Solo? Sure the old films will always be there, but that is completely beside the point. These films were made for 12 year old boys, straight from the mouth of Lucas himself. That's not the case anymore...
/r/MensRights21/06/16 10:30 PM
0

What? Can you answer me where the male role models are? Seriously... There are none. This is part of the equation. You readily accept the Mary Sue, I don't see why you have problems with the other half of the equation, ie. weak males that rely on that Mary Sue because they've failed completely.
/r/MensRights21/06/16 10:18 PM
2

I'm tired of hearing that women have more emotional intelligence than men. Why is all the great art made by men? Tears are a gift. They are the body betraying the mind. How is that a gift? Because it shows you truly understand the emotional resonance of something. Man-tears are merely a by-product of an intelligent mind being moved. When I find myself in tears and women in the room are not, 9 times out of 10 it's because they don't even understand what just transpired. I feel sorry for men who'v…
/r/MensRights21/06/16 04:32 PM
5

Finn can stand up for what's right. That's fine. In a movie about social justice, he would be a hero of admiration. In Star Wars, he is just a weak character. Han's character changed dramatically over the original trilogy. Han Solo at the end of RotJ was absolutely nothing like the self-serving smuggler we found in the beginning of ANH. He didn't prefer to go back at what he excelled at; he was forced to go back because he failed at everything else, which makes no sense given how much of a succe…
/r/MensRights21/06/16 03:31 PM
-1

No, I'm not. These films are about role models, heroes. These films used to contain characters that children looked up to. I looked up to Han and Luke, not because they were "strong characters," and certainly, CERTAINLY, not because they were "perfect," but because they were heroes—people I aspired to be like. There are no male heroes in TFA. No male role models. Unless your dream is to be a failure or "just friends."
/r/MensRights21/06/16 03:27 PM
4

Who was the strong male character? Finn? Falling down left right and center? Being friend zoned by Rey? Grandpa Solo? Who failed completely in life after RotJ and is now a living embodiment of failure? Luke? The man who literally failed the entire galaxy? And then ran away like a coward? Who are these strong male character?
/r/MensRights21/06/16 03:03 PM
8

Maybe you should have read a little closer. He didn't say education is a mental health day.
/r/MensRights21/06/16 02:40 PM
-5

It teaches contempt for men. Look at the new Disney Star Wars. It's pushing this narrative 100%.
/r/MensRights21/06/16 02:01 PM
6

What's wrong with moving back with mom for a bit? Oh, is it shameful? Shame is the main tool of manipulation to get people into eternal debt (and other detestable things, like marriage.) If I were in this situation, I'd much sooner move back in with my parents than become an eternal debt slave to a system that treats you with utter contempt. Shame is a control word. When you realize how little power words like it actually have, you are free in a way you never knew was possible.
/r/MensRights21/06/16 01:50 PM
0

...and marrying oneself isn't?
/r/MGTOW30/04/16 04:40 PM
2

You actually write fairly well. It's just suffering grammatically and there are quite a few typos. Most importantly I would review your use of "then" vs "than".
/r/MensRights20/04/16 03:34 PM
2

This article is in desperate need of editing. Desperate, desperate need.
/r/MensRights20/04/16 01:46 PM
1

They aren't usually called biologists, but they are biologists. Again, this doesn't really answer my question. I guess I'm just astonished this form of experimental psychology exists. I'm not sure how this information is useful in a psychological sense, and they don't seem to be interested either. They are just mining for data apparently, without any reason other than it's a sexual organ? This seems bizarre to me. Are psychologists now adrologists? How is this information going to help them in t…
/r/MensRights18/04/16 08:21 PM
3

What's more disturbing is what is actually being proposed: women, no rape. The Harvard final clubs are essentially, by folding, saying they need women among themselves to police the male members. That without women present in the club, it would just be a pack of rapists. It's astounding to me the more obvious, less heinous approach, being women taking responsibility for their own lives, is never even considered. Why don't female only final clubs teach responsibility to their members? That if the…
/r/MensRights18/04/16 02:08 PM
1

This didn't answer my question.
/r/MensRights17/04/16 02:27 PM
1

Psychologists study human sexuality from a psychological point of view. How does this data help them? Typically one researches something because they are hoping to find useful information. What information are they looking for? Do they have no psychological angle? They are just playing biologists then, which makes no sense.
/r/MensRights16/04/16 02:00 PM
1

So it's a one man research team? A one man research team observes and records data which is then used by feminist psychologists for what reason? To "study human sexuality" because it's "been ignored far too long" Is that supposed to mean something in a psychological sense? What is their psychological thesis for performing this study?
/r/MensRights15/04/16 08:48 PM
1

Feminist psychologists? Should this study not be conceived and executed by a team of biologists with a scientific goal of producing concrete data for scientific reference? Why are feminist psychologists doing this? Are we going to ask the math department to study the effects of female genital mutilation next?
/r/MensRights15/04/16 08:17 PM
0

This smells entirely of feminists wanting input over man's biology. For some, they feel it unacceptable that man has always had control over their biology, even if it is only a male doctor trying to help them. If these researchers were doing this in the name of biology that would be one thing, but they are feminists in the psychology department. It doesn't add up.
/r/MensRights15/04/16 07:43 PM
5

"It is not a pro-circumcision piece nor are they pro-circumcision." If they are not pro-circumcision, why would they stop their tests short of proving circumcision reduces sensitivity? They purposely neglect key areas to formulate a conclusion that is decidedly neutral. This, if anything, makes it feel pro-circumcision to me. Them saying otherwise means little.
/r/MensRights15/04/16 07:40 PM
9

I don't understand the premise. Shouldn't they be arguing the reasons why circumcision is beneficial? We're talking about mutilating children. "Oh, it doesn't decrease sensitivity from our limited, incomplete testing" "Oh, then what does it do?" "????" It seems to me like a bunch of doctoral candidates received funding to defend their sexual preference of genital mutilation. They aren't even biologists. They are psychologists. What is even happening here?
/r/MensRights15/04/16 02:16 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter