TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

KPplumbingBob Archive

View 0 posts and 1,720 comments by KPplumbingBob on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,720 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

I feel these takes are always way deeper than what is really going on. I don't think the goal of these measures is to "divide" the genders when even something like conscription doesn't do it. Are there any countries where men actively protested male ony conscription?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/07/26 08:19 AM
3

I don't know. Maybe I'm missing something, but this particular topic doesn't seem to be very connected to men's issues. I see people comparing it to conscription, circumcision... I'm not saying that a lot of what you're saying is wrong in isolation, but I can't agree with the assessment that anyone who places importance on body count isn't pro-male. That just seems nonsensical to me. There are plenty of reasons to prefer a partner who hasn't been highly promiscuous. The reason why a woman who ha…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/07/26 03:31 PM
7

A pro male only conscription conservative asking if this group is even left winged. You can't make this up.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/07/26 07:10 AM
4

Why the fuck would trafficking of males be a separate crime anywhere in the first place? Your post reminds me of people who say "oh well even though men technically cannot be raped in certain countries, women can be charged with this and that". And how often that does even happen in practice? "Fact checking easily with AI" 🙄
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/07/26 07:02 AM
6

Misandry only exists in people's heads, from what I can tell some hyper-online liberal feminists and radical feminists, who are marginal figures in the broader feminist movement. Are you not embarrassed posting outright lies?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/07/26 07:00 AM
15

It's hard to understand the other perspective when it is so detached from reality. Women being "mistreated for centuries" as a blanket statement is utterly untrue. These "safe spaces" serve nothing but shield from criticism and are a free pass for bigotry. And no, men are not allowed to have them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/07/26 06:06 AM
5

Except it was never a cage
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/07/26 06:02 AM
18

They consider "men" as a completely different category of people. The oppressors in charge. So you cannot be sexist and discriminatory to them, unless they are a part of a group that they approve of, like lgbt, minorities etc. It's hypocritical to the point of hilarity. Recently there was a misandrist on here saying how all cis white men are bad basically and deserve all misandry that they get. Because including black people and trans people would obviously be offensive. It's only cis white men …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/26 11:41 AM
30

Interesting topic. Not a misandry example but it's interesting just how differently is it viewed compared to misogyny. Just the other day I was reading comments on a few horror movies I've rewatched recently and there were lots of comments about people being unable to finish the movie because of "misogyny". There are literally males brutally murdered by a woman in the movie but what made it too hard for them to watch was misogyny. That's where they draw the line and stop watching the movie. Beca…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/26 06:23 AM
17

Hostility from feminism largery comes from trauma, really?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/07/26 07:26 PM
6

When I was reading all this I had no doubt whatsoever that Singapore ranked highly at the gender "equality" index.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/07/26 08:35 AM
2

Here is the thing. When you grow up in such environment you consider it completely normal. When I was serving a mandatory military sevice, not only it did not ever occur to me why do I have to lose a year of my life with no compensation or anything but women don't, but I would have hated myself for even thinking such thing. Because as well all know protecting our country and our women is our duty. Otherwise you're not a real man and no woman will want you. It's brainwashing and it's extremely ef…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/07/26 08:33 AM
32

Nobody is your friend if you're a man, that much is clear. The way I see it, one side tells you here is what it takes to be a man, you should do this and that to be valued. But also, here is what it takes to be a woman. The other side tells you, you're a man, everything is your fault. Also, here is what it takes to be a man. Obviously neither have your best interest in mind but it's not hard to see why one of these would be less favorable if you're a man. At least one of the options has expectat…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/07/26 07:41 AM
3

I find it strange that you have no problem saying that women are more emotionally intelligent. But my question is how do you even measure emotional intelligence? There’s definitely some nuance you are missing there. I can't see their post anymore but this seems to be a common feminist talking point. They have no problem saying women are more empathetic, caring, more trustworthy, honest, more emotionally intellingent. All things that you can't really measure. But if someone was to suggest men are…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/07/26 07:06 PM
18

All harmful social beliefs and norms that affect men is "just men doing it to themselves, so what do you want?". And yet when it's about women, like the beauty standards that are set by other women, not men, then it's a major problem that not only society needs to fix but it is specifically even blamed on men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/07/26 07:02 PM
8

It's next level mental gymnastics. Somehow in their mind lesbians experiencing more domestic violence than women from heterosexual relationships means it must be mostly men who are the perpetrators.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/07/26 06:52 PM
62

Recently I was googling something and found a related answer on reddit. It wasn't a gendered topic or anything. So I replied asking for clarification on a certain detail, I don't even remember what the topic was. All I remember was that I got the message that my post was removed because it is a "women only space". I was also banned from there. Solely for being a man. As someone who generally does not visit these female spaces that seems crazy to me.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/07/26 05:08 AM
11

We don't have to acknowledge anything here. Everybody knows it happens, just like far worse things in the world happen but aren't the norm. Posts like this are almost trying to give validity to the OOP.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/07/26 04:52 AM
7

I'm willing to bet women threatening to kill themselves if their partner broke up is even more common than the other way around. Saying this kind of thing happen is like trying to give validity to the OOP.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/07/26 04:48 AM
9

Even if go with these feminist fantasies of this being the norm, how is a man killing himself over rejection misogyny, and more importantly how is he still not the victim?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/07/26 04:32 AM
4

It's crazy to me how common this myth is, even today. Every single hobby I've ever had interest in, the most common joke around men by far is the ways they hide their purchases from their wives and girlfriends.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/07/26 07:33 AM
22

My favorite is when we have people coming on here asking "Men's rights??? What is the point of this place? What rights do women have that men don't?". And then when you ask them the same about women they have a meltdown but never actually answer the question.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/07/26 07:11 PM
7

Ironic post of the week.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/07/26 07:59 AM
7

So there was a huge outrage and here for the same thing you are saying it's just funny. Do you not see how laughably disingenuous all your posts on here are?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/07/26 05:11 PM
7

And how many women voted for Trump? Go ahead, post the numbers and then elaborate on that "proven fact".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/07/26 05:06 PM
14

Fueling the right with propaganda is what you got from that? Talk about pathetic.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/07/26 05:03 PM
3

You know it's bad when the Guardian are reporting it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/07/26 01:16 PM
11

What an awful post. One would say so typical for feminism. You took ONE case, try to paint it as the norm which isn't even remotely true then try to completely minimize the damage that toxic female spaces are doing, even going as far as asking "why are we spending time acting concerned over this", solely because it does not compare to the most extreme incel case you can think of. Do better.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/07/26 06:55 AM
25

I swear, the use of "whataboutism" is wrong most of the time. Ironically, the way people accuse you of whataboutism is just to deflect and shut down discussion and criticism. It's not whataboutism if I use a comparison on the exact same topic at hand and if your entire argument falls apart due to said comparison. "There is an epidemic of violence against women!" "But men are victims or violence at much higher rates, is that an epidemic too then?" "WHATABOUTISM!" No it's fucking not.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/07/26 08:04 AM
24

that would absolutely not survive the gender swap. Which isn't considered a problem these days. On multiple occasions when pointing out the double standard I was just told "boys and girls are different". It's crazy how closely the feminist ideology resembles right wing rhetoric, really.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/07/26 07:55 AM
27

As I was told yesterday by one our nice feminist guests: "misandry is not oppressive and the oppressed do not owe you men anything".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/07/26 05:59 AM
3

So you've learned all the feminist buzz words and got to use them in one post, well done. Feminists have highjacked the movements of actual marginalized groups to include women with them. Unfortunately for you, people are seeing right through it. the oppressed don't owe it to you to protect your feelings when their lives are continuously at risk. Women's lives are not any more continously at risk than men's are. In fact, statistically it is the opposite. Men are far more likely to be victims of …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/07/26 06:11 PM
2

Who is oppressed and what does "owing" anyone anything have to do with anything I've said?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/07/26 03:42 PM
5

Yep. By feminist definitions I have been physically sexually assaulted multiple times at work by women. But if you actually say that then there are these gotchas that make it not a sexual assault. "You weren't afraid for your life soooo...".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/07/26 06:12 AM
5

I was genuinely curious what that post was going to be and it turns out standard half truths or flat out lies presented in a dishonest way. THAT is the best proof of male privilege that you've got. Feminists are most definitely our enemies. THEY considers us the enemies solely for being here. Your post is disingenuous as it gets.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/07/26 07:36 AM
3

Did your feminist organization not also say drafting women "would not be equality" because "women have it worse in this and that way"?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/07/26 07:23 AM
19

What if you hated women though
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/07/26 12:56 PM
3

Most of position of power are held my men, it follows that most power is held by men. No it does not. Just because a tiny percentage of a certain group are in power it does not mean you can conclude the group itself holds power. We know for a fact that it's meaningless considering most of the bottom of the society is also men. Unlike women, men have no in group bias. A person in power being a male means absolutely nothing for the 99.999% of the other men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/07/26 08:54 AM
52

The fact that people think it is reasonable because "well, duh, it's a women organization" tells us everything we need to know about where feminism stands in regards to gender advocacy. For them it simply means sticking up for your gender no matter what and extract as much you possibly can in every way. The concern isn't equality or fairness. People say "imagine a male organization saying something like this". I will go further and say imagine any male advocate thinking men should get a priority…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/07/26 08:44 AM
14

Can you show one influential feminist speaking up against misandry, just one?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/26 07:21 PM
20

If you are going to claim false accusations are that rare then rape is just as rare by the same logic. Pretty telling that you guys always have to go with the middle east when you have to think of actual women's rights issues.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/26 07:18 PM
4

Yes I would. Can you define "a lot"? There is likely just as many or more radicalized girls than boys. The entire difference is the perception between the two. Remember that any pushback against feminism and misandry is labeled as "misogyny". Misandry isn't even recognized as a thing and one single visit to social media will remind you just how rampant it is among young women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/26 06:22 PM
21

Not only is it unthinkable but you would find nobody here who would actually want that. I don't want men to be at the center of rescue efforts at women's expense. The fact that it is so normalized to think this sort of thing is okay and that it equates to "advocacy" is deeply concerning. That's not how I envision advocating for your own gender. It's not a war or competition. Apparently feminism has other ideas.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/26 06:11 PM
45

But even if we accept this ridiculous premise that "misandry just hurts feelings", since when is that OK? This is the same group of people who think things like "microaggressions" are a major problem. Somehow they have no problem hurting feelings of half the population now? They would never say hurting feelings of women, immigrants, lgbt people etc is okay. Why is it so different when it comes to men?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/26 06:09 PM
8

Either "cry more" OR shift the blame onto him, claiming it's his fault that he feels called out by the misandry. Because it's obvious it's not about him personally and if he feels it is then maybe he's got something to hide.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/26 01:33 PM
18

Especially boys. The calls from UN women are to prioritize adult women over male children. Nobody who is defending that can be can be anything but a female supremacist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/26 01:17 PM
13

I knew it, I said exact the same thing in the previous post. They think it being a women organization makes this reasonable. And yet these same hypocrites would absolutely lose their minds if genders were reversed. Then it would be the ultimate proof of the patriarchy and male privilege. Notice how the equivalent examples they keep giving are absolutely incomparable, it's like they are competing who will think of the dumbest one. Even if you were to buy into their mental gymnastics to defend thi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/26 01:10 PM
11

No, it's not the equivalent to that. The fact that you think it is shows exactly what the problem is and how you view gender equality.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/26 12:52 PM
3

This is a bit of a weird question for me. I don't even see the manosphere stuff as a threat to male advocacy. People seem to be acting like there is no female equivalent to the manoshpere. There very much is, it just doesn't have a name or a negative label attached to it. And I don't think it's a threat to female advocacy in any way. The amount of men "turning into misanthropic freaks" is largely overstated.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/26 07:48 AM
7

This comment is so hilariously typical, it's like a caricature of feminism. Calls the sub "foaming at the mouth wackos" while foaming at the mouth about "hatred on women" when there is literally none. Zero facts, zero logic, zero counter arguments to any replies. Then as the cherry on top throws in the obligatory "insecure in his masculinity".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/26 07:42 AM
14

That you think this "reaction" of yours is some kind of a flex says it all. I'm sure you have similar reactions to crimes commited by black people or any other groups.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/26 07:31 AM
7

Doesn't Ukraine have bigger problems right now? Oh they do for sure. Like gender segregating public transport.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/26 01:25 PM
6

What I meant is that for some reason there are lots of men who bought into this idea that women are not shallow and do not care about height and looks. Like, if you make a statement that women find looks important there is a very good chance some guy will reply telling you how wrong you are and how you probably have no personality if you're saying that. I can't explain why it's that common, they probably just want to believe.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/26 01:23 PM
8

The fact that a "minimum height requirement" exists makes this argument pretty funny.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/06/26 11:35 AM
16

It's not reasonable when the point of the post is pretty clear and this poster is just trying to play dumb for whatever reason.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/06/26 11:34 AM
2

To think feminists come on here to call us out on being "toxic" and "hating on women". This post is worse than anything you can find in vast majority of the "manosphere", which is supposed to be the root of all evil.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/06/26 11:28 AM
9

There seems to be lots of backlash in the comments but almost exclusively by men. I've seen TWO women speak against it, and from their profiles they are highly conservative.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/06/26 11:20 AM
33

Online "incel" spaces are obviously not healthy for the minds of the individuals who do end up there. But when they are completely correct on things like this, not just height either, I don't know how do people expect them to get out of that mindset by plain lying to their faces. If you go to pretty much any sub or social media, people will try to sell you the idea that women do not care about height or even looks on the whole. I understand why women do it but there are so many men who do it too…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/06/26 09:43 AM
4

This logic has so many holes in it. If you have only males currently serving, both on the frontlines and in the support, the amount of men sent to frontlines does not change in this bizarro world where suddenly both men and women are drafted. If you draft both genders it does not mean your army is now twice as big. Women getting conscripted is not and cannot be "the worst of all worlds for men". There are many reasons why it would still result in inequality but that statement itself is just nons…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/06/26 09:39 AM
32

But it is used in that context pretty much 100% of the time. "I know this ugly guy who pulls women so it's just your personality". Most people will agree that a short man can still date a taller woman but odds are statistically very much against that happening. Anecdotal evidence is almost exclusively used to disprove the statistical trend.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/06/26 08:37 AM
43

And to think almost 100% of rescuers are men. They are demanding of men to prioritize an adult woman to a male child.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/06/26 08:29 AM
24

UN Women has already done this before on mulitple disasters. They don't care, feminists don't care either. They will always use the "oppression" card to validate anything.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/06/26 08:21 AM
38

In their mind an adult woman should get priority over a male child. Totally not misandrist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/06/26 08:20 AM
12

When you point something like this out feminists will often tell you "well it's natural they are concerned about women, it's a women's organization!". As if somehow that makes any sense whatsoever. Sure, advocate for women but there is a massive difference between that and female supremacy. A male equivalent of this tweet is unthinkable.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/06/26 08:16 AM
8

Obviously women face horrible systemic issues and violence. Nobody is denying that, it’s awful. Out of curiosity, which systemic issues would those be?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/06/26 05:07 PM
37

They always say what would a man know about what being a woman is like but then we have women defining what being a man is and what masculinity should be like. With all respect, how would they know? Imagine a camp where men are "fixing women".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/06/26 09:50 AM
1

Not only is that not a real statistic, but it does not address the question at all. Almost every woman you know has been a victim of SA because she's a woman... no reason to doubt any of that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/06/26 06:18 AM
13

but I understand that a lot of the power was concentrated in the hands of a few and that most everyone else was struggling. So "men" did in fact NOT have collective privilege over women. And you somehow still think the whole thing "makes sense".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/06/26 06:49 AM
7

This does not surprise me in the slightest, unfortunately. Everyone thinks they are in the right, which is natural. But liberals tend to be so extreme about it that moving even a millimeter away from agreeing with them on every single issue means you become the enemy. That's why you see this kind of thing so often. You comment on something in a completely unrelated subreddit, people check your post history and then use your participation in male advocacy spaces as a weapon against you. All while…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/06/26 06:59 AM
9

So even if we accept the feminist narrative, which we should not for a second, but let's say it's true that hating men just hurts their feelings. Why would you be with someone who is openly comfortable with hurting feelings of half the population? If it was about any other topic everyone would say "wow, that person is an asshole" but somehow this gets a pass solely because men are on the receving end. Remember, you are one of the good ones until you aren't. She tolerates you at best.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/06/26 07:29 AM
2

Sexual side effects are rare I really doubt this. I would guess a lot of people don't notice the sexual side effects because they normally come in gradually for most people, not the usual "I took one pill and I am impotent now" fearmongering that you can read. The first time I took it it took me months to figure out something isn't right and isn't as it used to be. Only when you stop taking it you realize how much it affected you. I went back for another try 3 or 4 years later, thinking maybe it…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/06/26 08:36 AM
61

Figures. In general, there is nothing you can say men are better at without it being seen as misogyny or an attack on women. Yet people often have no problem saying that women are more empathetic, compassionate, caring, fairer, have better morals, are better communicators, better listeners, more emotionally intelligent, more cooperative, less selfish, more trustworthy, more responsible, better parents, less prone to violence or unethical behavior etc etc . The majority of people believe in at le…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/06/26 08:44 AM
80

And yet women live much longer and have more favorable health outcomes overall. If what this narrative is trying to portray were really true that would never happen. I'd really like to see these people talk about women's bodies changing as "only hurting their egos". Fucking hypocrites.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/06/26 08:09 AM
9

Men as a whole have not oppressed women for centuries. That's a flat out lie. Learn some history.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/06/26 09:33 AM
26

Explain how
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/06/26 07:00 AM
20

The god part makes it easy for anyone to dismiss what they have to say as it is presented in such a nonsensical manner. Many will refuse to do this, despite great evidence of God’s existence. Shifting the blame onto unbelievers for failing to see such great and obvious evidence and yet when pressed their first go to is "Well, just look at the trees!".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/06/26 08:58 AM
20

Brainwashing is a very powerful thing. When I was serving the compulsory military service 25 years ago it never ever crossed my mind to ask myself "why do women not have to give up a year of their life like I do?". In fact, I would have thought of myself as "not a real man" if I did that. It's similar here, men are brought up to walk on egg shells whenever a female issue comes up. And if you make everything a gendered issue men do grow up thinking they owe this and that to women and don't see it…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/06/26 04:58 PM
4

There can be a lot more and it still does not change anything.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/06/26 04:50 PM
3

I do know that sometimes feminist complain about unrealistic beauty standards or body proportions within video games regarding women, but I do see that as a slightly different topic. Which exposes feminists as complete and utter hypocrites. Male beauty standards in video games are mostly unattainable even with steroids.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/06/26 04:47 PM
7

It's just yet another form of victimhood and nothing you say can change that. They are 100% fine with sexualization and unrealistic body standards for male characters. Age of Empires 2 has male and female villagers. Female villagers are modestly dressed normal women while male ones are shirtless mega chads on steroids. Nobody has ever had a problem with that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/06/26 08:24 AM
16

According to feminism internalized misandry does not exist and isn't a thing at all.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/06/26 03:57 PM
5

It's like cherry picking inception. They will only admit men under report abuse when they are gay.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/06/26 06:36 AM
5

Honeys, I'm afraid it is you who are misunderstanding the concept of gender equality Gender equality implies first and foremost that women and men should have the same human rights and fundamental freedoms Alright, so how do you have the same human rights and fundamental freedoms if you conscript men only?
/r/MensRights08/06/26 06:16 PM
15

There can't be many male victims if you actively fight against recognizing them as such. Nice circular logic there. Also, fuck minorities, am I right?
/r/MensRights08/06/26 06:03 PM
1

In the US, men are allowed to make decisions about their own bodies and decide whether or not they choose to have children ??? Men have zero reproductive rights. Men are also automatically registered for the draft and in majority of the world their bodies belong to the government. Child marriage affects boys at almost the same rate. The fact that you and the other guy had to go to the middle-east/Afghanistan to find inequalites for women says it all and answers the question perfectly.
/r/MensRights07/06/26 10:33 AM
10

Only exists online and hurts nobody physically So, even if we pretend there is any truth to this at all, we can then conclude 99.99% of all misogyny is no big deal because it does not hurt anyone physically.
/r/MensRights07/06/26 10:22 AM
21

Would never, ever survive the gender swap. These kind of comparisons never really work because it's an unthinkable double standard. Basically every analogy you can think of is so far from reality that it feels dystopian and morally outrageous. And yet the devaluation of male life in war is so normalized that it does not even register as an injustice.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/06/26 07:02 PM
32

“It is essential for us to provide Ukrainians with protection, but at the same time the war needs to be fought and won In other words, it is essential to provide protection for women. Men need to stay and die.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/06/26 06:57 PM
13

Olympic medal worthy mental gymnastics. So much hatred, all justified to yourself through the all encompassing boogeyman of patriarchy. Another victim of feminism that's too far gone.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/06/26 12:08 PM
10

No, that's not the problem and logically it does not make sense. Nor does it explain the rates of intimate partner violence of gay male couples.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/06/26 11:59 AM
12

The whole point of the word is to make the death of women some kind of special moral failure, unique and separate to the murder of subhumans or subcitizens like men and boys. That is exactly it and it's basically how it is being used already. I remember reading a post on this topic in the Croatia sub and people were disgusted at the statistic of us being "one of the worst in Europe". With six cases per year. Even our prime minister was talking about it calling for urgent measures. And that's wit…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/06/26 11:57 AM
3

But it is "men who started those wars" and it's mostly men killing other men so those deaths do not count and cancel each other out. With that in mind women are the primary victims of war.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/06/26 07:53 AM
32

Just a couple of days ago there was a feminist who came on here who kept telling me the reason she is "tired of hearing of men's systemic issues" is because places like these are "excessively hostile towards women". It's at that point that you realize there is no reasoning with people like that when it is so blatantly wrong.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/06/26 07:55 AM
8

When you say "so often", how often would you say in comparison with excessive hostility towards men that comes with female activism? Because when you look at it on the whole, there is absolutely no world where male activism comes even close to hostility. Even if you take the worst male activism has to offer, it is the criticism of feminism, not women. Nobody is "blaming women" that men are forced to serve, fight, kill and die. I am blaming specifically feminists like you, washing their hands off…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/06/26 01:18 PM
7

Finland, the "2nd most gender equal country in the world" has mandatory male only military service. Their gender equality act does not consider that a disadvantage for men, simples.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/06/26 07:30 AM
6

This is fine. According to our feminist friends it was "men" who set up the system so it is men's fault anyway and they don't deserve to live.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/06/26 07:28 AM
16

Feminism also backfires when so many men have unprivileged professions, from construction, mining, farming, lumberjacks, firefighters, garbagemen, and oil rig workers. Because feminists who talk big about equality don't want to do unglamorous jobs that men have historically done. I like how their argument to this is "well, we don't advocate for gender equality of garbage workers because women don't actually want to work those jobs, duh". No shit? As if men want to work there. As if they like the…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/06/26 07:16 AM
15

You are constantly blaming men collectively for this "system" that they took no part in setting up. That is your entire point and you have not responded to any counter points.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/06/26 07:10 AM
12

How about you address the points instead of falsely claiming nobody is listening to you? It was not "men" who set up the system. A man existing today does not in any shape or form mean he was complicit in setting up this system. It is that simple.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/06/26 07:08 AM
12

We’re tired of hearing men complain to us about systemic issues we played no part in creating, So not only is that utterly false, but would you accept the same logic when genders are reversed? If a female politician was to put forward an unfavorable law for women, do you think it would be ok for men to just go "oh well, what do you expect from us, you've done it to yourself". Of course you wouldn't because you think any societal issue that affects women is men's and society's to solve but any is…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/06/26 06:58 AM
11

as if the average woman played/plays a role in creating & upholding the system that created them The average man did/does not either, how are we still doing this? It was not "men" who set the system up. The average much has as much say in going to war as you do. Also "you" are not getting raped and killed. Men are killed at much higher rates pretty much universally. This is where your "but by other men" victim blaming comes in again.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/06/26 06:53 AM
25

After all, misandry doesn't exist, so they're in the clear and never have to call out their friends or fellow feminists Also even if it does exist, it only hurts feelings of men. Which is no big deal because the male equivalent is somehow a man killing a woman.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/06/26 06:48 AM
14

I mean there is a difference between personal attacks, hate speech and calling bible accounts a myth. The issue is that you can literally post "all men are trash and terrible human beings" pretty much all over reddit and it does not break any rules, nobody will do anything. I remember doing sort of an experiment a couple of years ago when I created a new account and went in regular subs posting first casual but then more and more extreme misandry. Ended up with positive karma overall. One wouldn…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/26 07:05 AM
1

Keep up the good work
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/05/26 06:37 PM
24

These kinds of comments will never stop being ironic when it comes to male mental health.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/05/26 07:05 PM
17

Again, you would never use this “separation from the issue” logic on any other group of people. Why is that? You would never say “I hate immigrants” is acceptable if you only meant the ones you’ve had bad experiences with. You would never say that their reputation is “deserved” or “warranted” based on the actions of the bad apples. Maybe, just maybe, the people actually spouting hate should do the separation from the issue instead of coming across as bigots themselves? It is very much a lie that…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/05/26 07:03 PM
17

Those are some olympic medal worthy mental gymnastics there to make the "we" and "us" not be about us. Women have never been safer in history. The "few bad apples" argument places the blame, again, collectively on men. As if a regular guy has anything in common with a criminal who attacks women. You are telling to that young man to suck it up until we eradicate crime entirely.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/05/26 06:50 PM
8

On a scale 1-10, how much do you hate yourself?
/r/MensRights28/05/26 05:32 PM
16

I understand your concern for male life and I share that It doesn't fucking look like it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/05/26 05:14 PM
23

I am not seeing any positive comment in the fourth image, can you elaborate? I see two posts saying OP is "not important", in a mental health sub of all places, and any hate directed at men as a whole is "obviously" not directed at him. You would never use this kind of reasoning againts any other group of people, why is it different for men? So when racists generalize about black people or immigrants nobody should get upset because they are obviously talking about the bad ones only, right?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/05/26 05:07 PM
6

It's even better. "Stop targeting women journalists". More like, stop killing women but KUTGW with men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/05/26 04:01 PM
69

Where does this idea that women are "killed, raped and tortured for being women" even come from? It seems the majority of hate and fear stems from that but how and why? How has feminism managed to convince people that is the case? So, I'm not saying there aren't any cases of it happening but in almost all cases where the perpetrator was a man, it's a man the woman knew and had some relationship with. Not a random guy "killing for saying no". It's easy to say "just ignore people like this", but t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/05/26 03:56 PM
11

These same women who expect me to be their personal body guard because it is my "duty" wouldn't lift a finger themselves to help me in a similar situation. I'm totally done caring about it. It is absolutely nothing but shaming tactics. No, I do not owe you anything, let alone put myself in danger because a criminal who has the same private parts as me has done something.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/05/26 09:01 PM
4

I'm not sure if you meant to do that or not but it perfectly shows what the problem is if you think those two things are somehow mutually exclusive.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/05/26 07:05 PM
8

Some good responses but it is mainly because "it is men doing it to themselves, sooooo...". Just look at ANY feminist response to a video of an innocent Ukrainian man being taken off the streets forcefully. "Forced by who? It's not women doing it". They think it's an easy way out for them, they think it's a gotcha. It is hypocrisy and massive projection at the same time. They think a man in charge will "obviously" favor men, so if that's not happening there must be a good reason for it. And if t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/05/26 05:10 PM
28

Either that or they frame it as you "caring more about this than people dying". As if you can't care about two different things at the same time. It's the same as with the "not all men" argument which is considered "problematic and harmful". Something bad happens, somebody says "men are horrible human beings", you challenge that idea and now YOU are the one who is problematic because apparently you care more about men than this bad thing that happened. Every single time. Or when someone claims t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/05/26 04:51 PM
18

The amount of pushback he is receiving solely for the not all men argument is insane. Those male feminists tripping themselves over to prove it's all men DO realize that as far as feminists go it strongly puts them into the same group too? The literal opposite of being "one of the good ones" if that's what they are hoping to achieve. Their arguments do nothing but reinforce the idea that no man is to be trusted.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/05/26 04:14 PM
3

How convenient that a referendum on a gendered issue wasn't a gendered issue.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/05/26 07:10 PM
3

Blame the perpetrators - not the victims. So in this case literally all men. Not those who actually do such things but men. You would never ever treat any other group as potential perpetrators based solely on immutable characteristics. Because I assure you, if these was an option to avoid immigrant drivers people would be using it too.
/r/MensRights16/05/26 12:09 PM
30

They do this because they see everything through gender wars lens. It's projection too because they think men do the same. They think your average man will agree with the deranged idiot who celebrates killing of a woman solely because they are a man.
/r/MensRights16/05/26 11:59 AM
7

so that women as well would be pushed to participate en masse in the fight for its abolition. Ironically, men too! Men would be far more likely to fight against it if it affected women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/05/26 06:56 AM
19

In Finland, for example, young men who refuse to comply risk either prison sentences or fines. It's crazy how much social norms and social conditioning affect the way people think about things. I remember a post on reddit, it wasn't in a mra/femininst sub, asking finns what they think about mandatory military service in their country. Most who responded did not see anything wrong with it. On the contrary, people thought of it as an honor. I guess that's not too surprising to me because I went th…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/05/26 03:23 PM
12

I'm sure you wouldn't have a problem with a feature to avoid black people. Because surely someone must have had "bad experiences with them".
/r/MensRights15/05/26 09:45 AM
17

Either way, bringing up the idea that it is "men" who started wars in the context of forceful mobilizations is stupid and unbelievably tone deaf. Literally the only thing your average Russian or Ukrainian man has in common with Putin/Zelensky is that they have a penis. If you treated any other group that way based on an immutable characteristic feminists would be the first ones to be up in arms. If you want to see a feminist turn into a hardcore conservative right before your eyes, just bring up…
/r/MensRights14/05/26 06:43 PM
4

/r/confidentlyincorrect
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/05/26 12:57 PM
5

WTF does that even mean? This kind of thing would never be acceptable when applied to any other group of people. Why is it that you are actively supporting bigotry, what is wrong with you?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/05/26 12:56 PM
4

So what do your experiences really have anything to do with spreading hate against the entire gender? I assume you have problem with the far right saying people of color and immigrants should stop being criminals? I mean that's pretty fair, considering the statistics say so, right?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/05/26 12:54 PM
3

The left also wants you to do exactly that. The only difference is that they have no set of expectations from the other gender.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/05/26 12:46 PM
30

It's not hatred if it's directed at men though.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/05/26 12:41 PM
42

Honestly, men should get some type of legal advantage if they're the only sex susceptible for the draft since there's not a female version of the draft Croatia recently reintroduced mandatory military service for men. The initial proposal suggested that those who served would receive minor advantages to assist with employment, essentially a "paper benefit" that employers could consider but weren't required to follow. It was a half baked idea. Then the Gender Equality Ombudswoman challenged this …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/05/26 04:12 PM
2

Whether the reason is valid is completely up to the individual. We do have evidence of people with high body counts having more trouble bonding.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/05/26 01:18 PM
1

Maybe someone experimented at an orgy and racked up 10 different bodies in that one session. Afterwards, they decided it wasn't for them. This alone does not indicate anything other than sexual curiosity For most people it indicates a lot more than "sexual curiosity". Vast majority of women are never "curious" enough to have sex with 10 guys in one session. Also very weird language, framing it as "entitlement". Nobody should be forced to do anything but you are basically advocating for keeping s…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/05/26 01:15 PM
3

That says a lot because women have literally never in history been safer in public than they are now. You'd think the fact that they feel something that isn't true would be addressed by stopping the fearmongering, but instead they want to turn the fearmongering up to 11.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/05/26 12:57 PM
12

Because "women and children" is not a thing and has not been for a couple of hundred years. We literally have "femicide" laws where women's lives are valued far more. What are you even trying to say here?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/05/26 12:49 PM
5

Olympic medal worthy mental gymnastics.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/05/26 10:52 AM
8

It would actually make a lot sense to me if men cared more considering how much easier is it for women to get laid. Feminists often complain how a guy who has lots of sex is praised but a woman is not but considering the above it is completely logical why. There is of course also the ugly side of that where men who do not have a lot of sex are shamed and considered the ultimate losers but we won't talk about that and will just present it as another male privilege instead.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/05/26 08:05 PM
22

It’s the go to topic whenever misandry is brought up. "But women are getting killed". It’s basically an admission that they don't care about men's lives at all. It’s not that they don’t know men are killed more often, it’s just that they value women's lives so much more, to the point that men don’t matter and don’t even count. To them women belong in the same group as children. When it suits them, of course. At all other times that by itself is misogyny.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/05/26 07:59 PM
9

I see this often and I don't get it tbh. It seems whenever there is a large group of people saying or posting nasty stuff someone claims they are probably bots. In reality, the simplest explanation is the most probable one. In so many ways, the covid times taught me that yes, there are in fact many, many horrible people out there. People who don't care for the wellbeing of others in the slightest. People who are willing to spin the narrative in any way they want just for personal gain/satisfacti…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/05/26 04:16 PM
11

What a strange thing to desperately try to cherry pick data for, and still fail.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/05/26 06:58 AM
6

If it only was just some vile people from some subreddit though.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/26 07:16 PM
15

What makes this worse is that these people specifically go around boasting about being bastions of morality and fairness.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/26 07:02 PM
5

How do you conclude that men do not have dangers in regards to their personal safety? That's exactly the point, that's not true at all and the reality is the opposite of that. You don't feel like you're at risk of being robbed but in reality you're more at risk than a random woman is.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/26 06:30 PM
5

Fashion is roughly 2-8%. That's close enough to make comparisons. Also, when I claim "one of the" it does not mean top 2 or top 5, it could be top 10 and still one of the biggest. It would also be relevant to the topic at hand as this study considers a 8% gap to be significant.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/26 06:23 PM
8

Yes you are.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/26 06:18 PM
13

But it's men and the patriarchy that force them to use those products! As we know, they can't get out of the house looking anything less than perfect because the society expects that of them, because men said so.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/26 06:17 PM
3

This. It seems like a counterproductive divide to me.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/26 12:53 PM
12

They are not just as sexist to men. You can point out how conservatism is inherently misandrist but they are most definitely not as sexist to men as the left is. The left actively hates on men and doesn't even try to hide it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/26 07:02 AM
23

And yet the narrative is that "reddit hates women". which is one of the most ridiculous things I have ever heard. How many subs are there where a comment that treats women as subhuman trash has 10k upvotes? A regular sub that "promotes equality" at that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/26 06:58 AM
45

"Lmao some sensitive men triggered by this one" This is like the most typical feminist response ever. Paint men as subhumans and when they push back call them "triggered".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/26 06:51 AM
8

Framing one of the biggest systemic human rights violations as male privilege is classic feminism.
/r/MensRights05/05/26 05:47 PM
1

/r/confidentlyincorrect
/r/MensRights02/05/26 07:22 AM
25

How TF can one entire group of people be "not subject to discrimination"? Just think of the implications of that statement. Do they even know what the word means? It's like refusing ginger people to enter your store and say "we do not consider gingers to be subject to discrimination". That's not how any of that works. Go ahead and tell me this lunacy is not just as bad as anything right wingers are doing and the way they treat trans people, immigrants, muslims etc. They have no problem comparing…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/04/26 08:40 PM
9

Is this is one of those "this and that group is making us look bad" posts? If so, we should not care what red/black pillers, incels and machoman posturers are doing because they are not MRAs. Feminism is deliberately trying to put us all in the same basket and you can't win that game by playing by their rules.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/04/26 07:19 AM
5

It's not like women can vote or anything like that. Not to mention it is pure victim blaming. Not to mention THEY made it about women. I'm sure this person would be OK with men saying "not out problem" for any injustice a woman would face caused by another woman. In reality it is the exact opposite of that. Any problem that women face, men and society have to fix it. Any problem that men face, it is their own fault because they are men. And as we know all men are the same and therefore deserve t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/04/26 08:57 AM
3

That's such a disingenuous position, especially in this of all threads where male advocacy is literally framed as "pushback against gender equality". Where you ask? Well, everywhere if you are willing to listen. This just seems like the very thing the UN Women article is doing. There are no feminist spaces where men are not blamed for every problem women face. Not male advocates but men. But when men, who barely have spaces of their own in comparison put the blame on feminism, not women but femi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/04/26 03:56 PM
2

But it's different. Women do it because men are clearly not doing enough these days and aren't worth dating!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/04/26 06:59 PM
13

Men: "We also have issues that affect mainly our gender and want our voices heard" Feminism: "ORGANIZED AND STRATEGIC PUSHBACK AGAINST GENDER EQUALITY BY MEN"
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/04/26 06:20 PM
13

They know what they are doing. It's a way for them to shut any opposition down.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/04/26 06:17 PM
50

also, they project this onto men, thinking men are the same This is really imporant because a lot of anti male rhetoric comes from it. "It is men who created the system/laws", "it is men who are in position of power", etc. That's their proof of female oppression and male privilege. Because if they were in such position they would definitely favor women, anything else is unthinkable for them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/04/26 04:11 PM
60

The same UN Women who went from "women and children" to "women and girls", even in terrible tragedies involving deaths of children in places like Gaza. Sure, it's the MRAs who are dividing communites. It's telling that they don't even have an argument, just that instead of pushing for solutions we "argue that society now favours women". That is their problem. They don't reflect on whether that's a valid point or not. Literally the vast majority of feminist talking points are about the society fa…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/04/26 09:22 AM
2

Instead you resort to easily debunked feminist talking points and literal lies. Which is way worse, if you allow me to mansplain.
/r/MensRights26/04/26 08:14 PM
4

I like how for the draft you default to the US but for genital mutilation you had to go to Africa. Also were hard pressed to admit genital mutilation of boys isn't OK but it somewhat is because "men invented religion soooo". Talk about mental gymastics to come to disgusting conclusions. In all countries where women serve, they serve shorter than men to and are never sent to front lines. Most countries with draft are male only. Women have more rights than men do so by the same logic feminism is a…
/r/MensRights26/04/26 08:12 PM
4

Men are much more systemically oppressed than women are. Literally everything you said is completely wrong.
/r/MensRights26/04/26 08:04 PM
4

Men face fear of what? Of pretty much everything that women do, just more. Are you honestly trying to pull that shit over here of all places? You really think we don't know who gets assaulted, robbed and killed more?
/r/MensRights26/04/26 08:01 PM
11

"I’m the type that I want to be approached by a guy". In other words, the "type" who expects the guy to take all the risk and initiative, even though she wants the interaction. Somehow he is supposed to know all this and take the risk.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/04/26 04:08 PM
6

It doesn't have to do with who is making the study, nobody is saying the study itself is biased on purpose. It's the social conditioning part that makes men and women perceive certain things very differently.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/04/26 03:59 PM
47

The comments seem pretty detached from the actual video. So many saying young men consume a "shocking" amount of manosphere content and how it's not safe for men and women and it needs to go away. Acting like even the likes of Tate are a cause rather than a symptom. They want it to go away, poof, just like that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/04/26 08:43 AM
8

This means they experienced DV in their relationships with men, before they started dating women. It does not mean that. It's what you are saying it means without anything to actually back it up. You most definitely do have a position.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/04/26 05:58 PM
7

Literally nobody is saying that Russia is better. You're not "making Ukranie look bad" by posting a real video of real events. You are showing the truth.
/r/MensRights25/04/26 10:32 AM
8

If you are unwilling to defend your home then you should be forced to make big rocks into smaller ones. So you're telling this to Ukranian women?
/r/MensRights25/04/26 10:31 AM
2

It's mostly social conditioning. Women and most men think it is reasonable that men sacrifice themselves. There are literal videos of Ukranian women watching these and shaming these men.
/r/MensRights25/04/26 10:29 AM
8

Male draft is a human rights problem worldwide, how fucking hard that can be to understand? One doesn't have to have the same experience as Ukranian men to make a point. What a ridiculous position. My father was forced to fight in a war, I was forced to serve, we lost family members in a pointless war. Everyone is different but male disposability is one constant. You and that comment are creating an argument out of nothing and arguing in bad faith.
/r/MensRights25/04/26 10:26 AM
17

Your suggestion has nothing to do with anything.
/r/MensRights25/04/26 10:21 AM
27

They are mad when boys/men approach, they are mad when they go their own way. It's impossible to win. As if it's not enough that a man who can't get a girlfriend is considered a "loser", where everything is his fault of course. Now him chatting with a bot is considered problematic. They must put as negative spin on it as possible, implying they want to "control" women. The problem can't be that they are lonely and can't actually find someone, nope.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/04/26 10:13 AM
19

Much lower, lower than hetero couples too. You say the lesbian DV statistic is "misrepresented" simply because some lesbian women used to be in relationships with men too but then conclude "the majority of perpetrators of violence against lesbian women are male" with no proof or data whatsoever. Because there isn't any and it's the classic case of clutching at straws because you are uncomfortable with the most likely explanation for the whole thing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/04/26 09:59 AM
23

Absolute bullshit. How do you then explain the DV rates of gay male couples?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/04/26 08:12 AM
8

Using every feminist tactic and buzz word in the book, spreading lies and false statistics and to top it off, playing the victim with the "it's cause I'm a woman". You are not worth anyone's time.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/04/26 05:02 PM
12

Notice also "I don't know but I'm sure it's not on the same level". With the mandatory smiley face too.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/04/26 04:59 PM
7

What has feminism done to hurt you and men as a group of people It has spread propaganda so we have people like you who spread misinformation and disinformation, false statistics and outright lies. Misogyny does not "kill women by the hour", it can only do so if you attribute everything to misogyny. There are far more men being assaulted and killed pretty much universally around the world. Even systemically. Why do you ignore that altogether and try to paint the picture as an "epidemic" against …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/04/26 04:55 PM
8

Toxic masculinity is not "hurting and killing women all over the world", what is your logic behind that statement? And how in the world is it a systemic issue?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/04/26 04:33 PM
23

See, this is what pisses me off because it is so blatantly disingenuous and dishonest. The difference between 62 million and 1000 is roughly 62 million. It's as dishonest as it possibly gets and the poster knows what they are doing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/04/26 04:38 AM
117

I think for a lot of people "hate group" would be too strong a word but in reality if the genders were reversed or if it was a matter of race, most would easily accept that label in the equivalent scenario. Compare that to male advocacy that is often associated with the likes of Andrew Tate who isn't a male advocate by any stretch of the imagination. And even he is mild compared to the disgusting comments you can find by certain feminist icons. It's a stark contrast how the two are perceived.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/26 04:55 PM
50

Imagine if genders were reversed. Guy pushes the door and enters home of a naked drunk woman and films her. Wonder what the narrative would be then. There is absolutely no world where he is seen as the victim by anyone in that scenario. And yet people had no problem taking this woman's side.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/26 01:13 PM
5

Classic feminist manipulation tactics. Frame everything as men not caring about women's freedom, rights and lives. All while swearing and yelling and at the same time posting biased, misleading and questionable sources yourself.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/26 10:43 AM
2

But your corrected version is not any better, that is the point. It does not have to be a hill to die on to be discussed.
/r/MensRights22/04/26 07:16 AM
12

This is special kind of stupid, and that's saying a lot considering we're talking Reddit here. "Deep" still working is somehow proof that false accusations do not ruin lives of many men.
/r/MensRights22/04/26 07:08 AM
9

there is no interest by Reddit enforcing rules against hate, misinformation, or threats of violence They literally said men do not fall into "vulnerable" groups so those rules do not apply to them. Of course, to anyone with a brain that would be absurd but here we are.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/04/26 07:49 PM
10

That's just not true at all. Just compare this place to any feminist sub. It's not the same thing by any stretch of the imagination. Misandry is basically encouraged in female spaces. Online is not some kind of a different world that is detached from real life. MRAs are not judged by a vocal minority, they are judged by default simply on the basis that they advocate for men. You will literally be banned by certain subs solely for participating on here. Just like feminists say you are not a good …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/04/26 07:43 PM
5

Go back to covid and see conservatives doing exactly this. Make outlandish claims about the vaccines and then move the goalposts and say "well even if it's one case then it's one too many!". It's the same thing, when it's the propaganda that they like the left loves to do the same. As if it wasn't clear enough how hypocritical it can be when it comes to things like body shaming where doing it to one gender is fine but it's basically a crime to do it to the other.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/04/26 05:02 PM
2

Which is why the "even if it was one it would be one too many!" argument is unrealistic fantasy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/04/26 04:57 PM
7

It's amazing how similar feminism or even the left is to the right wing/conservative ideology in its ways. I remember during covid when conservatives were posting misleading statistics of thousands or even millions of deaths from vaccines and when you would correct them and say the article they linked does not say that at all they would go all "even one death is one too many!". Exact same thing here. These people don't give a shit about the victims, they don't care about the truth. They want it …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/04/26 12:38 PM
3

So what is it that you are actually saying, that there should not be bad things happening in the world? And somehow you think anybody on here would disagree? You could literally make this argument for everything. "Even one woman murdering their child is one too many". But what does it even mean?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/04/26 11:29 AM
12

They think they can put a "if you debate the numbers you are the problem" disclaimer and just silence any opposition that way. It's classic feminist tactics. They KNOW it's wrong and they WANT everyone to think it's true.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/04/26 11:21 AM
3

It's very much deliberate, you can't discuss anything on that topic without being accused of being pro rape. Like this idea that "rape is worse than death". I believe it might be for some people in rare cases but generally it's not, it just isn't. Both are horrible things of course but it wasn't me who made the comparison and I'm still not allowed to say that and disagree.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/04/26 12:42 PM
3

You say "not exclusively" as if the number is even in the same universe, and not deliberately misreported by a factor of 62 000. I care about the truth and you should.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/26 09:46 AM
8

It's typical feminist manipulation tactics. Make outlandish claims, deliberately misinterpret statistics and then when challenged use the sole fact that a person has challenged you to make them the bad actor. And it's working because in general you can't push back against this sort of thing without being called a rape apologist. Or, like we've already seen in this thread it apparently makes you not a real leftist. There is no nuance to the topic as far as they are concerned which allows them to …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/26 09:41 AM
10

The fact anyone in this sub calls themselves a leftist or an advocate of any kind is a joke. Figures that someone who thinks deliberate misinformation is "unfortunate" would says this. It's so typical. Misinformation, lies, discrimination, all is acceptable as long as it's "for a good cause" or aimed at the right group of people.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/26 09:36 AM
5

It's not on a topic like this though, that's the point. It's overall hits from all people to the entire site which is a generic porn site.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/26 09:28 AM
8

Deliberate misinformation is lying. The fact that you're trying to put it down to "misunderstanding" says it all.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/26 09:26 AM
6

You are overthinking this and giving too much credit to anyone. It's just hate, they want to hate on men and finding any reason to do it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/26 09:05 AM
15

So are you unable to read or reason?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/26 09:03 AM
25

With the women are wonderful effect very clearly being a thing, it's just crazy to me that there is this idea that "women are not believed". It seems people want men locked up based on words from a woman alone. Further proving how powerful the women are wonderful effect really is.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/04/26 10:49 AM
-24

Oh fuck off. If it's not this then it's another reason why "MRM movement is a joke".
/r/MensRights18/04/26 08:17 AM
7

Except it's not a site the specializes in the darkest of porn, it's literally the opposite of that. It's clear that you have no idea what you're talking about. Talk about kool aid.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/04/26 08:10 AM
8

"Brutal reality" and then proceeds to post literal lies as facts. 1 in 6 women are not raped between 16 and 64.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/04/26 08:07 AM
2

but not necessarily the only one And not just that it isn't the only one, it would in fact be the least common one.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/04/26 08:04 AM
2

Funny how the "by another man!" equivalent isn't valid all of a sudden.
/r/MensRights17/04/26 08:05 PM
9

Visits AND it's a generic porn site AND it's not just men. People should really know better than to take these claims at face value.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/04/26 07:32 PM
3

Even in countries where it's not a law, a crime will be in practiced judged more harshly when the victim is a woman. That's pretty consistent all around the world.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/26 09:56 AM
3

By basically treating them as second class citizens whose lives matter less?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/26 09:54 AM
2

Is the violence against men not deeply ingrained in your culture by the same logic as well?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/26 09:52 AM
3

It is entirely you who came up with the idea that women are being blamed. Why are you doing that? In all countries where women need to serve it is for shorter time and they are not sent to front lines.
/r/MensRights14/04/26 07:07 PM
5

It also annoys me how male insecurity is always portrayed as something bad, something he is at fault for and something to be ashamed of. But for women it's usually the fault of the society that she has insecurities. Even a far as body positivity goes, any insecurity a man has about any of his body parts is seen as negative as he should just work on himself harder because the only reason he has little romantic life success has to be because he has bad personality. But women are told they are perf…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/26 12:35 PM
6

What a sad individual.
/r/MensRights13/04/26 10:59 AM
7

This entire post is such a feminist self own. From completely fabricated statistics, to outright lies and then victim complex as a cherry on top.
/r/MensRights13/04/26 10:57 AM
8

This place is part of the "manosphere" according to feminism, so you are wrong on all accounts.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/04/26 06:42 PM
42

And you call that out and they tell you how "fragile" you are and how there are far bigger problems to worry about. And yet if you were to tell an actual joke, like some sexist stereotype about a woman being a bad driver you are automatically labelled a misogynist and things are now 100% serious.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/04/26 06:20 PM
1

Oh, but she's not a REAL feminist. Or something.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/04/26 10:36 AM
3

I see that despite the fact that this coercive measure applies only to young men, they added a wonderful picture depicting men and women altogether to make like that they are also concerned, even if it is not the case? As someone whose country just brought back male only mandatory military service it's usually even worse. Almost every article on that topic and it's either a female soldier in the foreground or it's just a picture of a female soldier alone. It is very much deliberate.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/04/26 04:21 PM
2

Absolute and utter bullshit, proven by every war ever. Women have never been used as "incubators", no war has ever been panned out that way. Learn some history.
/r/MensRights10/04/26 09:39 AM
5

So moving the goalposts from "this is not hateful" to "there are more important things to worry about". Surely there are much more important things to worry about than what you are doing here.
/r/MensRights10/04/26 09:36 AM
3

Link one. Go ahead.
/r/MensRights10/04/26 09:33 AM
67

To be honest the idea that it makes men sound like they matter more is infuriating. Just how does anyone come to that conclusion? The notion that we should be satisfied just because they acknowledged it could mean male lives matter less is ridiculous, when it’s clear as day that it’s simply male disposability on display. Even the women angle. Sure, you could say it does infantilize women but at the same time they fail to mention that female lives are simply valued more. That's the primary thing …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/04/26 09:06 AM
17

It's a giant favor if they don't face the same responsibilities, yes.
/r/MensRights05/04/26 08:48 AM
60

Always found that curious. The whole idea of gender self identity completely goes out of the window the moment of the tiniest posiblity of shit hitting the fan. Even in the US draft registration it is suddenly perfectly clear what a man is and what a woman is.
/r/MensRights05/04/26 08:46 AM
7

Gotta love the "fake news! it's just tracking or registration in case conscription is reintroduced!" thrown around as if that's just nothing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/04/26 08:25 PM
39

I really dislike this idea that male advocacy "should" be this and that and shouldn't be reactionary. Feminism achieves literally everything by doing what we supposedly should not be doing. Sort of the like when people say if you want to be taken seriously then you must adhere to these strict rules. And yet feminist spaces are the exact opposite of that where misandry is not only rampant but actually encouraged. If the reason people are concerned about this sub becoming something they don't want…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/04/26 11:48 AM
7

The same poster on there who claims the term egalitarian is "literally another term for feminism" also says this on generalization of all men: Would you dip your feet in a pool swarming with snakes? Figures. What a disgusting POS.
/r/MensRights02/04/26 05:10 PM
8

Gotta love how on the topic of misandry the biggest and the only concern is... misogyny. Hatred of men, women most affected.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/03/26 12:46 PM
6

"In an ideal world it wouldn't be ok for me to hate men. But I've bought into the feminist lie about oppression so unfortunately for you, that gives me a free pass to be a misandrist and a bigot. Also, an opposition to my views of any kind is misogyny. If you don't like men being called rapists or trash then those views of yours are playing into the hands of the misogynists".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/03/26 12:45 PM
11

The right: here is what it takes to be a woman, and what it takes to be a man The left: gender norms are sexist and harmful, nobody should be telling anyone what to be and what to do. BTW, here is what it takes to be a man. Also, you are at fault for everything bad that happens in the world. Also the left: there is a worrying trend of more and more men going right wing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/03/26 09:22 AM
10

It's wild how this guy even uses the term "civilians" at one point and then in the same post says "there is no way around it".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/03/26 07:53 AM
6

??? "No way around it". OR, you could consider men as humans and when you say "civilians" include men in there as well? Maybe if social norms are that male lives aren't important we could work on that instead of further devaluing them? Crazy idea, I know.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/03/26 07:52 AM
30

Imagine being able to care about more than one thing. What you're doing here is a classic feminist tactic. Downplay an issue because there is something more important out there, and frame even a mere mention of it as "dedicating so much energy" in order to minimize the problem and shut the discussion down.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/03/26 04:53 PM
47

Um, yeah. Without going into the "who is worse", half the population being the acceptable punching bag is pretty fucking bad by itself.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/03/26 04:35 PM
28

The right might have many views I don’t agree with on both men and women. But I honestly think they see both genders through a more balanced lens overall. They believe there are both positives and negatives to being a man or a woman. Their refusal to put women on a pedestal is seen as misogyny by the left. I don’t agree with their strict views on gender roles but at least there is room for both genders each with their own privileges and responsibilities. With the left it is just reduced to man =…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/03/26 04:29 PM
3

You are from the US, a rich, geographically insulated country where mandatory military service does not even exist, saying other countries should just abolish conscription altogether. As if it's just a matter of abolish vs keep and not about balancing security needs with fairness, taking into account each country's environment and economic capacity. But then at the same time you do say you don't give a shit what happens in not so wealthy places in not so fortunate circumstances.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/03/26 07:41 AM
2

I live in the US Alright, that explains everything then.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/03/26 07:18 AM
3

Again, that's speaking from a position of privilege. Perhaps where you're from is why you can't wrap your head around it. The implication seems to be that conscription happens and exists just for the hell of it. No matter the mental gymnastics used to argue that not conscripting women is "better for men", I just want things to be equal, it's that simple. Ironically, if things were equal there would be a bigger chance of no conscription happening than me or men doing anything about it. You assume…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/03/26 06:50 AM
8

For many countries what you're saying would a position of privilege, not reality. Tell that to, say, ex Yugoslavia countries that nobody ever should have been conscripted. Of course it's not a good thing from the position of human rights, nobody is disputing that. I have lost family members who helped defend the country, I am certainly not advocating for conscription. I don't get the argument on how women getting conscripted would be worse for men. It just wouldn't. What am I demanding? I don't …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/03/26 04:43 PM
7

That demand is unrealistic for many countries. So as long as that's the case, let's start with making things gender equal. It's sort of like saying we shouldn't need military, it would be better if there was world peace. Well yeah, but...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/03/26 11:32 AM
8

Female privilege
/r/MensRights22/03/26 08:51 AM
1

Literally not true. Why would you literally lie about it?
/r/MensRights22/03/26 08:49 AM
1

And yet not one single intelligent thought coming from you, I wonder why? No war is fought in the way you and weirdos like you think they are fought.
/r/MensRights21/03/26 04:05 PM
0

What a weird post. Trying to make it out like the original post is something completely different, as if we can't read it by ourselves.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/03/26 01:47 PM
17

Very true. I've had some of these discussions recently and people just don't want to admit things aren't as simple as "it's hard to be a woman online". They don't even want to hear about boys/men getting harassed online as well. In reality, all kind of abuse is pretty acceptable when a man is on the receiving end. You could literally have a game lobby where males insult each other and that's normal but when it's directed at a woman it's misogyny and harassment and a danger to all women. Of cours…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/26 07:28 PM
2

Seems weird to make such a big deal out of it either way.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/26 05:32 AM
20

So why are you using feminist rhetoric then? There is nothing to address. Andrew Tate does not stand for male advocacy, he is not a MRA, he himself has never identified as such. It is feminists/you doing the association, not himself.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/26 06:15 PM
15

Yep. Their comment that has been deleted proves it's a feminist troll.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/26 05:26 PM
27

Sick of these kinds of posts. You expect male spaces to be held not only to the highest standards but to impossible ones. You want people here to actively call out “bad men” who have absolutely nothing to do with us. If they’re “giving us a bad reputation” it’s because you are putting us in the same basket, not because they’re actually doing anything in our name. Andrew Tate is not, and has never been a men’s rights advocate. He has never considered himself one. End of story. Do you ever see fem…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/26 05:22 PM
22

"They are being sent to prison by other men!" So internalized misandry then? "No, that doesn't exist". The society will bend over backwards to find a reason or an explanation as to why a woman did a bad thing but men are just seen as inherently bad. The worst thing is that lately that includes boys. I remember stumbling upon a teachers sub and the way people talk about literal children is beyond disgusting, it's alarming actually.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/26 07:46 AM
22

Framing men being used as guinea pigs as a privilege would be strange if men being forced by the government to serve, fight, kill and die also wasn't framed as such. As it is, it's classic feminism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/03/26 08:24 PM
28

Like, not even victims. Men apparently can't be uncomfortable for any reason.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/26 04:31 PM
19

How could you possibly say that about half the population with such confidence?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/26 04:30 PM
4

how they contribute to the same polarization/radicalism that birthed maga in the first place. This is especially true. Kind of like how they want to "fix" young boys by demonizing them and having "Andew Tate bad!" on repeat instead of asking themselves how and why did the boys end up listening to him in the first place?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/26 11:06 AM
3

It is interesting how much they hate this place in particular. So your regular male advocates are all right wing, Andrew Tate worshipping misogynists according to them but they hate this sub even more. It does not compute with them that you can be a leftist and disagree with feminism, or with anything really. They see people on here as either fake lefists or traitors.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/26 10:59 AM
8

I wonder if this ever happens in feminist subs? I've seen some downright hatred of men with nearly 1000 upvotes on twox. And yet it's this place that is a "cesspit of toxicity towards women".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/26 06:53 PM
21

I feel the left does this so incredibly often that it's not even just a powerful group but any group that they feel like deserves it. So I'm no Trump fan by any stretch of the imagination but I've noticed the left will treat someone who voted for him as if they are the second coming of Hitler and they deserve any and all abuse that comes their way by default, no question asked. Recently I saw a post on an american woman who apparently went to Ireland and was kicked out of a pub. She then made a …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/26 04:28 PM
10

"Who is going to give birth to babies to repopulate the country?". That is legitimately their argument. As if having the choice of having children and being forced to fight, kill and die by the government as the same thing. And as if that has actually ever happened in history of wars.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/03/26 01:49 PM
14

It's the power of feminism and how extremist it really is in its nature. There is no doubt many people do think it's unfair but they are afraid to speak because they will get hit immediately with the "SO YOU WANT WOMEN TO DIE AS WELL, THAT'S YOUR SOLUTION?".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/03/26 08:49 AM
7

It is very much intentional and they do it all the time. Croatia has brought back manadatory military service for men only and whenever there is an article about it most of the time it's a female soldier in the front.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/03/26 08:47 AM
16

People in general are very uncomfortable with the idea that women lie about these things. They want to pretend it's only in super rare cases and it's for the best we don't hear about them and pretend it doesn't happen. There is an excellent Danish movie The Hunt (2012) which deals with a case of a false accusation and a man getting his life ruined. I've seen so many people say it was a great movie but they didn't like that "it could make people believe women lie about SA". They think the way it …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/03/26 06:34 PM
52

But her being punished will deter real victims from coming forward! And when I say victims I mean women only.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/03/26 12:16 PM
2

This all reads like it is written by chatgpt.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/03/26 02:45 PM
3

That would be like defining men’s advocacy by incel forums It's very funny that you say this because it is exactly what happens. Men's advocacy is largely described as part of the "manosphere" in feminist circles. Go to any feminist place and ask them what they think of male advocates. Go ahead.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/03/26 11:03 AM
10

Ah yes, male disposability is not tied to misandry, it's just gender essentialism. I am sure in an imaginable, bizarro world where just women are sent to serve, fight, kill and die based on their gender alone, that would not be described as gender based discrimination and misogyny. I have to give it to you guys, the amount of mental gymastics to make these "important distinctions" is pretty impressive.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/03/26 07:49 PM
21

The "women are more valuable because they will give births" argument is plain stupid because that has never happened in the history of any war. Plus, if you really want to draw that comparsion then women would be required by the law to do so.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/02/26 12:18 PM
11

"We" have not been running anything. I have not at least, don't know about you mr rich guy.
/r/MensRights26/02/26 01:55 PM
1

Ironic
/r/MensRights23/02/26 05:53 AM
26

I saw a wild one recently. Apparently recent analysis shows "women work for free 47 days of the year compared to men". They came up with this conclusion by presenting "wage gap" as women being paid less for the same job. It's pretty amazing really because one of the main reasons why men are paid more is because they literally work more. So men working more is turned into "women working for free compared to men". Peak mental gymnastics. TUC General Secretary Paul Nowak said: “Women have effective…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/26 09:05 PM
11

She gets downvoted because she dribbles horseshit like "man or bear was about highlighting women's safety" when it was obviously about nothing but demonisation of men. And this kind of "concern over safety" would never fly in a million years if it was about any other group. Which tells you everything you need to know. If there is one thing that it "highlighted", it's how socially acceptable misandry is. To the point it doesn't ever register to people like her. Because assuming a random, average …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/02/26 09:24 PM
49

It's projection. Feminists and many women say this because that's what they would do if they were in power, favor women. They can't comprehend that men do not have an in group bias where they defend a man by default or care for his well being over women's.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/02/26 09:12 PM
3

It's interesting how people will have a problem with feminists saying men are a danger to women and children or that "misogyny kills" but then they have no problem making blanket statements like "conservatives kill their children".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/02/26 02:07 PM
2

This is some feminism level debate, sorry. Make outlandish claims then try to prove them with sources and statistics that don't really support the claim at all.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/02/26 02:02 PM
1

Is that not regular feminism though
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/02/26 01:55 PM
2

But it's the exact same thing. Black people commiting more crimes is also hidden in that sense. It boils down to the same "you never know who the bad ones are".
/r/MensRights14/02/26 09:20 AM
6

Women have more rights than men do.
/r/MensRights14/02/26 09:15 AM
8

So what is it that you disagree with? It's ironic because your reply is a perfect example of victim mentality.
/r/MensRights14/02/26 09:15 AM
1

Or you could ask the question "What rights are women lacking? Feminism prides itself primarily on advocating for women's rights and there is a real argument to be made that women have more rights than men do.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/02/26 07:18 AM
19

"But you didn't actually have to go to war so it's like nothing". Sure, let's have women sign up for mandatory birth in case of a war. It's unlikely to happen anyway, right? I'm sure that would fly. Not to mention how tone deaf is it considering what's happening in the world right now.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/02/26 04:16 PM
33

Seeing the mandatory draft described as a "nothing burger" by one of the feminists in the comment section always reminds of what feminism really is.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/02/26 04:06 PM
1

The wording is not the issue at all. Come up with anything else and they will still call you a right wing incel misogynist. It's manipulation tactics. If you stop using men's rights you are just playing into their hand even more. I for one will NOT distance myself form men's rights.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/02/26 02:21 PM
2

Why even post that if you have absolutely nothing to say? Your arguments are absolute trash.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/02/26 02:14 PM
28

But patriarchy does not exist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/02/26 10:12 AM
15

The exact same group of people who think things like "microagressions" are a big problem dismiss misandry as just men getting their feelings hurt. Yet they would care very much about any other group getting their feelings hurt. Of course, misandry is much more than men getting their feelings hurt but this is enough for me to see how hypocritical the stance on men is.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/02/26 09:51 AM
3

But seriously. It's one thing nobody has asked themselves. What if it was a woman who ordered food, instructed it to be left at the door and the person who was delivering it was a man who decided to open the door, enter the house and film her naked in her house? It would be HER who was the victim of SA, that would absoutely be the universally accepted view.
/r/MensRights07/02/26 12:23 PM
2

So why comment on it if you have no idea what happened and this is the first time you're hearing about it?
/r/MensRights07/02/26 12:19 PM
10

I like how even on here you get at least one batshit crazy feminist take on pretty much every topic. The epitome of man is the victim, woman most affected.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/26 06:02 PM
41

"The system set up by men for the benefit of men!".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/02/26 10:05 AM
23

I don't like this idea that mensright is "too toxic" to have an impact. Vast majority of feminist spaces are far more toxic, it's not even close. As always men are being held to different standards so their spaces must be this and that to be even heard.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/01/26 11:37 AM
26

Well look no furher than Finland that prides itself as the 2nd most gender equal country in the world. Check out their laws and how they justify it. TLDR: they decided the forced male only military service is "not discrimination", boom, solved.
/r/MensRights28/01/26 05:42 PM
8

Yep, 100%. Men are cowards, and we never do anything to stand up for our own rights. All we do is whine and complain. At least feminists are funding themselves and taking action, but no men will actually stand up and fight for themselves. Almost like there is a social element to it in form of men being raised as "protectors" and with a "duty" to protect women and country. Totally has nothing to do with the shame of going against these social norms, it's just that men are cowards.
/r/MensRights28/01/26 05:39 PM
6

Sad to see these extremely short sighted views posted and upvoted on here of all places. It basically boils down to it not being a big deal because it will not affect you personally, probably. Not only, again, is it a bit tone deaf considering what is going on in the world right now but if what you're saying is true then all the bigger reason to make changes now, no? A human right violation where the government potentially basically owns your body, all that based on your gender is a "non issue" …
/r/MensRights28/01/26 05:36 PM
6

There are so many cases that happen every single day: Two men. One woman. And in the end, one man is dead or badly injured, one man is in jail with the life consequences of a criminal record, and the woman goes on her merry way. So many permutations of these cases every day. This reminds me of a video I saw quite a while ago. Woman pushes a man, he pushes her back with less force. Then a whiteknight comes in and decks the guy with such force that he hit his head off the floor so hard it wouldn't…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/01/26 02:20 PM
10

Yep. And when it's the other way around it's understandable. I remember seeing a video clip of a robber or whatever entering a club and female security guard just running away, leaving people behind. And comments were mostly just "what is she supposed to do, get hurt?". Whereas a man is expected to get into literal fight with a possibly armed person to defend a woman stranger.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/01/26 02:15 PM
13

It's telling that your favorite example is something that is utterly irrelevant to men "refusing to forfeit certain privileges at the expense of women". Why would anybody be morally obligated to be a vegan? How TF is eating meat, something anybody can choose to do, a privilege?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/01/26 09:04 PM
98

A lot of them are so used to it being so acceptable in society that they don't even register it as hatred of men. And even if they do they rationalize it by saying men "deserve" it because of this and that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/01/26 08:59 PM
16

Yes, why?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/01/26 05:12 PM
31

Let's conveniently ignore just how many women voted for Trump. Especially the fact that majority of white women did. A feminist being disingenuous. What a shocker.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/01/26 04:53 PM
7

This is heavily disingenuous. We already do. I don't like the implication that everyone in the community treats women as objects they want complete control over like we're all just carbon copy clones of Andrew Tate being made here. It's the classic feminist debating tactics. From the get go make it seem like anyone who has any disagreement whatsoever has a problem with women having their rights and doesn't see women as human beings. That way nobody can disagree or question anything you do or any…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/01/26 07:42 PM
4

It's hilarous, really. Did not address any of your points and chooses to play victim instead.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/01/26 07:38 PM
6

Disagreeing = disrespectful. Yep, we can see you're a feminist. Unfortunately, these debating tactics that immedatelly win you an argument in your world do not work like that in the real world.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/01/26 07:37 PM
4

What a load of waffle. Sorry, it doesn't deserve a better response. Your "analysis" as to why there are more women in education is one of the most hilariously simplistic and reductive reasoning I've seen. Of course with some mandatory victimhood added in with "lower pay". You seem desperate for us to hate women, to the point you will make up disgusting things about us like celebrating that suicide rates of women have gone up. Talk about having to get off the internet and go out in the real world…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/01/26 07:33 PM
1

the default reaction in the comments is to get defensive and start ranting about how everything is society's fault instead of focusing on solving the problem at hand. Because as we know that's not exactly how feminism gets things done, right? It's funny how in a way you are telling men to "man up".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/01/26 07:19 PM
1

Why not point out the equally serious problems men face, many of which are very much systemic? Eg. the draft, the education gap, violent crime, homelessness, sexist domestic abuse and rape laws, harsher criminal sentences, police brutality, male genital mutilation, workplace deaths, suicide etc. This sounds like someone who has never tried such thing. Go ahead and try it and tell us how it goes. The draft? It is MEN who start wars and it is MEN who send other men to fight. Homelessness? Obviousl…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/01/26 07:02 PM
3

So you have to earn the right to not get bullied based on immutable characteristics by compensating it somewhere else, like being a famous good person? How do you not see how stupid and selective this "logic" is?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/26 08:51 PM
23

For example this lady shaming another person's height she thinks she's being a righteous person because she's fighting against an ICE agent but the fact that she's using his height especially since it's body shaming and something he can't control she does not know she's contributing to something she believes she hates To think of all the things she could be shaming him for and she goes for height immediatelly. So for all these people on here telling us "THIS is what you're worried about??", yes,…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/26 08:40 PM
11

"I have nothing against short men but being short is obviously bad and something to be ashamed of so I'm going to use it against this bad person. That will show him!". It's hilarious how little self awareness feminists have, as evidenced by some of the replies on here as well. They come up with all these meanings and terms of how "harmful" this and that is, but they are free to use anything they want on people they don't like. Sexism, generalizations, body shaming, it all gets a pass and they do…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/26 08:37 PM
3

It's hilarious that the actual reaction is the complete opposite to what you're saying. Talk about bending reality to suit your agenda. True for the rest of your comment as well.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/26 08:23 PM
28

It's funny because you'd think that would make it sound worse but the average person will have more of an issue with the "women are wonderful" than "men are horrible". Many will characterize the latter as a fair description of men while somehow, for some reason people want to dismiss the idea of the women are wonderful effect being a thing. Because then they would have to admit female privilege exists in any form and they've been taught it doesn't and can't exist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/01/26 10:26 AM
8

Lying and making things up. Are you by any chance a feminist?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/01/26 10:57 AM
3

And yet, reality is the complete opposite of this fiction. Men are mugged more often. How could that be when men are much stronger and more likely to fight back? Because even criminals have a code to not attack women and children. A woman is much more likely to scream for help from bystanders. A criminal who attacked a woman will not have a nice time in jail. Men are safer targets for them most of the time.
/r/MensRights11/01/26 12:22 AM
2

This isn't even worth responding to. Just a bunch of literal lies.
/r/MensRights11/01/26 12:17 AM
6

Because global peace is never going to happen. It's much easier to make things fair for both genders by being inclusive to women than to wait for said peace to happen.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/01/26 12:11 AM
2

Because people value women’s lives more. Which should be obvious to anyone. This is one of the reasons why feminism is so dishonest. It only ever acknowledges certain privileges that men have and acts like women don't have their own. So they make a big deal about society percieving men to be more suited to leadership roles but completely ignore that society also considers women to be more truthful, ethical, moral, kind and fair. Women are considered to have more empathy and to be flat out better…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/01/26 05:20 PM
5

This post is an embodiment of feminism. Insist that men don't have issue, but even if they do it's only fair. Make up lies about history and make sweeping generalizations and then end it with "don't take it personally".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/01/26 09:26 PM
3

They are not.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/01/26 09:22 PM
10

It's ironic because you are too stupid to understand what the issue is. You won't find one single instance of anyone defending Miller here. In a way you proving the hypocrisy of the left.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/01/26 08:44 PM
4

"It's evident they are here even if they don't post". Come on now. Even if these "bad actors" are here you really think you are going to sway any opinions this way? Besides, I don't think "cuck" and "beta" is used in the context that you are making it out to be. Unless you are talking about red pill circles which you shouldn't if you're directing this at MRAs. I really, really hate the term "safe space".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/01/26 09:02 AM
3

If you think women were given a bad hand in history, due to which they still suffer in certain sectors of life you're a feminist. No, you're not?? The fact that you are comparing it to religion should tell you something but it's apparently lost on you.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/01/26 09:12 AM
25

Feminism by itself is not egalitarian. I don't see how one can disagree with most of feminism and call themselves a feminist. A lot of people on here agree with certain feminist principles and goals, it doesn't make them feminists.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/01/26 10:35 AM
30

Why would any man consider himself a feminist? The movement literally hates your guts and sees you as the enemy by default even if you obviously have good intentions.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/01/26 09:17 AM
11

The idea that punishing false accusations will make victims not come forward is so ridiculous. As another post says, in the case of a false accusation the accused is the victim. Suddenly we don't care about that?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/01/26 10:03 AM
31

I've always said, if false allegations are "rare" then actual rape cases are "rare" too. 8.7% is more than I would have expected. The problem is they want to treat every case of a man not getting convicted as him "getting away with it". So you end up with bogus statistics like 98% of rapists getting away with it and false allegations being extremely rare.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/01/26 05:06 PM
6

If men were living much shorter all research funding would go to male health. Also the same if men were dying of cancer and cardiovascular diseases at higher rates. If men were killing themselves twice as often all attention would be direceted to male mental health. If in most countries men had to work longer to reach pension it would instantly be changed. Oh wait. It's just tiring victimhood bullshit that doesn't really deserve a proper response.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/01/26 09:47 AM
1

I assure you that is absolutely false. As we can see from your example. The sooner you accept it, the better for you. Finding a woman half your age who will like you solely for just who you are isn't going to be easy. Good luck.
/r/MensRights01/01/26 12:11 PM
1

You say older women but then mention women in their 20s and early 30s. That's not "older", especially when you are in your 40s. You seem to have a bit of a delusion going on in regards to women prefering older guys. It is usually for money and status. The fact that it can happen that a woman is actually attracted to an older guy, it doesn't mean it's the norm. It's strong cope, really.
/r/MensRights01/01/26 12:09 PM
15

Shouldn't forget violence by proxy. Women often use men to be violent for them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/12/25 12:31 PM
2

Not only is that a bit of a bullshit claim but it wasn't even about having a permission to buy stuff in terms of spending money or being a dependent spouse. You are missing the point of the joke.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/12/25 05:41 PM
5

What do you mean? Can you actually imagine a store even jokingly putting up the latter sign? The point is that sexist jokes are only permitted when they are at the expense of a man.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/12/25 03:06 PM
15

I'd really like to know in which societies is there a institutional and systemic support for the hatred of women. Conscription alone is a much bigger and clearer case of institutional and systemic misandry than anything I can think of. It's funny becase by downplaying the situation with sexist courts, DV, conscription and circumcision they are literally proving the point.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/12/25 11:24 AM
29

The context is never actually what they are claiming it to be. The "context" argument also comes up whenever you point out blatant misandry and sexism towards men. In the r/funny sub there is a post with a picture of a sign in a store that says men need a written permisson from their wives to buy paint. So someone said "imagine if it was the other way around and in the tools section of the store it said wives need permission of their husband to buy stuff" only to be hit with the "you are ignorin…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/12/25 11:12 AM
10

Recently I argued with a guy who insisted violence doesn't have to be physical. So he kept coming up with words that already mean something else but insisted violence can be those things too. So why not use those words then? Because they want to equalize using words to physically harming someone. Only for one gender too.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/12/25 01:01 AM
38

Ah yes, censor and cancel everything you don't like. Label anything and everything that disagrees with you as "harmful". Why are young men getting "radicalized" again?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/12/25 12:06 PM
5

Funny how every single issue that affects men, including systemic discrimination is down to "men" only, not society as a whole which then includes women. Somehow women are these powerless beings that have zero say in anything. You are basically saying, men have historically had a shit deal when it comes to disposability. Why would women want equality and fair treatment for everyone when it would then affect them and take away their privileges. Very much sounds like feminism, I will give you that…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/12/25 06:43 PM
11

It's kinda ironic that they even can't comprehed the idea of this applying to men. In their mind it is completely normal that this sort of thing isn't offensive and doesn't warrant any backlash, solely because it's men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/12/25 06:33 PM
16

Nobody is saying she is wrong in that sense. What a weird post.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/12/25 05:50 PM
36

ou can make insane over-generalizations about men, calling them stupid, violent, creepy, weird, toxic, what have you, and there are no social or professional repercussions And even better, if a man dares to defend himself it must be because he is one of the those things. Why would he care otherwise, right?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/12/25 05:47 PM
27

If a male musician said the key to writing hits is to call women stupid in as many ways you can would you be still saying it's not serious, just "ragebait"? Would the media and the public be saying that or would there be a serious backlash? You know the anwser damn well which makes you a massive hypocrite who is coming on here to argue in bad faith.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/12/25 05:42 PM
10

There is absolutely nothing wrong with no fault divorce. Anyone who is against it is extremely shortsighted or has not thought things through. It's the unfair laws and practices of asset division or alimony that destroy a man, not a no fault divorce itself.
/r/MensRights21/12/25 11:25 AM
2

You just made a up a definition that you want it to mean, instead of what it actually means. It is the exact point of the post that people like you who don't know what the word means continue to throw it around so much that they apply it to children. Do better.
/r/MensRights21/12/25 11:16 AM
26

"Men" as a group never had all societal power, it never happened.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/12/25 10:58 AM
9

To be fair that's a nonsensical assumption.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/12/25 10:11 PM
7

Yes, just look at Ukraine and rely on those millions of anecdotes instead. Let's ignore history too. Literally all societies use men as cannon fodder and force them to fight, kill and die. You ignore that because WOMEN.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/12/25 05:55 AM
9

Opinions can be wrong. That particular opinion is objectively wrong. Anecdotal evidence of one individual does not change that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/12/25 05:53 PM
6

While compulsory military service for women might be seen as “a step toward gender equality,” it added, the idea would “place an extra burden on many women, who already shoulder a large part of the unpaid work of raising and caring for children and relatives, as well as household tasks.” Victimhood olympics gold medal worthy stuff there. How TF are those two things even connected in any possible way? I am guessing men should start asking for special treatment because they do vast majority of shi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/12/25 01:38 PM
11

Are you disputing that men are considered the disposable gender? How do people like you even exist?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/12/25 01:29 PM
2

But we shouldn't use that definition because that's not what feminism is.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/12/25 11:03 AM
6

As is almost always the case, whenever a relationship breaks up, both sides feel they are in the right and the other is in the wrong. Somehow people are unable to accept there are two sides of the story. So even when a woman is acting in the manner than you are describing people will still rather choose to believe her. Women are wonderful effect.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/25 09:20 PM
17

I keep hearing that stupid Manchild song on the radio on the way to work almost every day. Every time it makes me think what if a guy used a female equivalent to sing about. He would be universally perceived as a misogynist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/25 07:20 PM
5

But that's very shortsighted. There are already proposals on "digital violence against women" laws being presented. Exclusively viewed through the "men=perpetrators/women=victims" lens.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/25 12:06 PM
26

Woman said man did it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/12/25 02:28 PM
36

If anything, a pattern of domestic violence and/or intimate partner abuse beforehand would be in favor of it not being a femicide. It is supposed to be a killing of a woman on account of her gender. If it's somebody she knows or her intimate partner, it just makes it all the more unlikely she was killed because of her gender. It's stupid and nonsensical but it is basically just a way to legally make lives of women more important.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/12/25 02:27 PM
3

And yet you believe not getting convicted for a crime = guilty. That's what your bogus stats say. Somehow in your mind that is more reasonable than to assume the person was innocent.
/r/MensRights08/12/25 02:09 PM
13

Or a MOVIE. I've seen claims that movies such as The Hunt (2012) are "problematic" because they "play into the narrative that women lie about sexual abuse". They don't want the world to even acknowledge that it's something that happens. But they have no problem if a man is being potrayed as a rapist, even though vast, vast majority of men are not.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/12/25 01:52 PM
18

Feminism falls under Egalitarianism. Feminism is about equality. Starting the post with a lie. Not the best way to get your point across.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/12/25 03:08 PM
1

So the picture here is not that women are 'exaggerating' danger No, it is exactly that. You are cherry picking stats to make the reality be something that is not. Statistically it is men who should fear physical harm. A stranger randomly assaulting and killing a woman over rejection is extremely rare. It's just not a fear grounded in reality. If your argument is that it happens so the fear is justified then every person who ever sits in a car should be terrified.
/r/MensRights07/12/25 10:21 AM
7

Ironic that they say stop victim blaming, when they are doing exactly that to men and boys who have been abused. "Yeah, by another man!".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/12/25 08:04 PM
43

When my hair started thinning it hit me pretty hard even though I was already 30. During that time I frequented hair loss forums and online spaces and it was pretty disheartening seeing young guys in early 20s being in much worse condition than me and seeing what they are going through. It's a source of anxiety and depression in many young men, I imagine it can only be worse now. And yet the advice was, and is still the same: just shave it off! Just like that, lose all your hair and all is fine.…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/12/25 07:57 PM
35

Lots of comments about their bodies too. Ironic that they keep doing the "left wing people good, right wing people bad" but then act like that. We already know the right is very hypocritical but the left seems to have no self awareness whatsoever.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/12/25 07:46 PM
11

That sounds better then wanting to add women to the chopping block It sounds better to you because you know it cannot be done so you can pretend that you care.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/12/25 04:39 PM
22

Ah yes, I forgot women have no input, no agency, no responsibility.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/12/25 04:38 PM
1

Why does it matter though?
/r/MensRights30/11/25 03:53 PM
1

what someone does with their own body that’s of no concern to you? Funny how you keep framing it that way even though it's obviously not what vast majority on here have a problem with.
/r/MensRights30/11/25 03:52 PM
3

Deepy unpopular for a good reason. I wonder why that's not the case anywhere.
/r/MensRights30/11/25 03:50 PM
60

Men are brainwashed into thinking being protectors is their role in society. They think protecting women is a noble act.
/r/MensRights30/11/25 03:42 PM
24

Every area where men lag behind is considered their own fault. Just recently had a talk with a woman who kept saying all the best jobs are reserved for men. I mentioned how the other day I was walking by this construction site in the centre of the city where they are renovating the road and sewage lines and how all the people working in this cold, dirty, loud, smelly and dusty environment were men. Literally all of them. And she just hits me with "well that's their own choice". As if these men d…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/11/25 04:45 PM
2

Physical violence isn't the only form of violence to exist. If you want the words to mean something then yes it is. It doesn't mean the issue of harassment does not exist but it's not violence. Don't make it into something that it's not just because you want it to be taken more seriously or be talked about more.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/11/25 06:00 PM
5

men actually experience more online abuse Which really should not be a surprise to anyone with any life experience. Men receive abuse, discrimination etc on regular basis but they are supposed to suck it up so nobody considers it to be a problem. When I see things women complain about at work I think to myself that's what men go through as well, we just don't talk about it. They really think men have it easy when it comes to being listened to at work, or being promoted, or getting a raise. You j…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/11/25 05:52 PM
29

It's funny how feminists fight for "equality" but when topics such as male conscription and male disposability in wars come up they have no problem arguing women are inherently more valuable so the practice makes sense.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/11/25 05:48 PM
2

Killed by male partner has nothing to do with it being femicide though.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/11/25 02:55 PM
3

And how often does that happen?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/11/25 02:49 PM
4

It's ironic that they call this and the other MRA sub "an echo chamber of misogyny". I got banned from TwoX for simply participating in the MRA sub, I never posted there.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/11/25 10:15 PM
5

True, although it is more of a silent rejection because you are not really allowed to say it publicly otherwise you are "against women's rights". Manipulation tactics. It's insane how common such policing is on platforms like reddit. Someone posted a screenshot of female football players generated by the new Football Manager game. I only said "most of them don't even look like women", which was the point of the original post in the context of how bad the graphics are. My post got removed by mods…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/11/25 10:01 PM
11

It is of no surprise that a UN secretary can post something like this and find nothing wrong with it: https://x.com/unwomenchief/status/1984057198226625012 It's not even women and children anymore.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/11/25 04:39 PM
19

It impresses me that in this day and age women still use the 'the draft hasn't been used since the '70s' line. How tone deaf do you have to be to completely disregard what's happening in the world right now? Just look at Ukraine if you're not bothered about the rest. That is the reality for majority of males in the world in all cultures. They are treated as disposable humans and western world as a whole is not any more advanced or progressive on that particular issue of human rights. Most wester…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/11/25 04:27 PM
6

No, it's not like saying that. More like until we find a way for world peace to be a thing (press x to doubt) let's work on things being fair to both genders. Human rights are such a big topic these days and yet somehow men being forced to serve, fight, kill and die are not part of the conversation.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/11/25 11:02 AM
82

Women love to use the "it's men's day every day". Where I work for women's day women are given a day off and a dinner by the company. One guy jokingly said it's not fair that men have to work that day and was immediately hit with "it's your day every other day of the year". Like what, when does he get a day off because he is a man? It's such tiring victimhood bullshit.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/11/25 10:53 AM
4

I recently watched The Hunt (2012) and it's a fantastic movie. It was very well received but I looked online and saw some absolutely wild takes. People saying they liked the movie but didn't like that it was about a false allegation which "could make people think women lie about rape and assault". Like, they don't even want the world to acknowledge it's a thing at all because it somehow makes people "not believe women". Also mild spoilers: we are shown that the guy did not do it, the premise of …
/r/MensRights18/11/25 05:19 PM
28

It’s just a way to put all the blame on men and avoid any responsibility. Every issue that affects women is supposedly something men or society as a whole must fix. But anything that affects men is treated as their own fault, and they’re expected to deal with it themselves. Feminists often describe the patriarchy as a system created by men for the benefit of men. So how can that same system be so disadvantageous to the very gender that supposedly “oppresses” others? In reality, the "see, the par…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/11/25 12:13 PM
4

Why would they "ask her if she was SAd" and why would that be relevant.
/r/MensRights14/11/25 02:30 PM
12

No, and neither do men. This post is framing it like there's a disparity between genders when it comes to asking for consent. In reality people who don't want to have sex, more often than not women, are simply raped. "Framing it like there's a disparity" and yet majority of the comments clearly show it to be.
/r/MensRights14/11/25 02:14 PM
7

Well why don't you try oppose with some actual arguments? Be the change you want to see.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/11/25 12:01 PM
8

nobody expects you to spend 3 hours every morning just to look adequately presentable. Good thing nobody expects this from women either, especially not men. No man would ever give a slightest bit of fuck if you wore the same dress as yesterday either.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/11/25 11:59 AM
16

It's just yet another manifestation of the women are wonderful effect. I don't know how can anybody with any life experience actually believe this idea that you need to be "good" otherwise no woman will like you or want to be near you. It is so ridiculously common that I can't stop noticing it. Whenever a man does something bad or is perceived not to be a good person, people for some weird reason automatically assume he does not have a girlfriend or is not married. Because obviously no woman wou…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/11/25 11:57 AM
6

Perhaps you should ask yourself first is her "feeling" unsafe justified or not. If you are feeling unsafe with half the population then it could be a you problem. Sexual assault, kidnapping, violence is much, much more often done by the person that knows the victim, not some random stranger who is doing his job. If I felt "unsafe" riding with an immigrant, it doesn't mean we should treat all imigrants as potential predators.
/r/MensRights07/11/25 05:18 PM
7

False equivalence is a logical fallacy where two things are presented as being equivalent or comparable, even though they are fundamentally different in some important way. So not false equivalence then.
/r/MensRights07/11/25 05:14 PM
5

So how can you say it's not true when most cases don't even go to court? The only way you can do that is if you assume the man is guilty and women is telling the truth, which is a circular argument.
/r/MensRights04/11/25 07:14 AM
7

Ironic that you have posted all feelings and zero facts.
/r/MensRights04/11/25 07:11 AM
3

Yes, and my dad works at Nintendo. You have done nothing to support your claim. I don't care where you work, saying "it's not" doesn't cut it. Nobody actually knows the exact amount of false allegations because it's a complex subject. Anybody who claims they do are full of shit. For example, you.
/r/MensRights04/11/25 07:10 AM
3

Only a moron wouldn't find issue with the original statement.
/r/MensRights03/11/25 08:44 PM
13

Absolute bullshit. These supposed unattainable beauty standard are first of all perpetuated by women themselves. Literally all a woman has to do is not be fat but apparently even that is too much these days. Never ending victimhood.
/r/MensRights03/11/25 08:40 PM
11

Saying the rate of false allegations is low is just like saying the amount of actual rape cases is low.
/r/MensRights03/11/25 08:36 PM
2

they are things some people wrote down on a piece of paper once So, like the Law of Moses?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/11/25 06:38 PM
16

Ask yourself this. Would you be ok with male only spaces where men share details about their "crazy ex" and warn other men about any woman they've dated? I mean, why would they exaggerate things or lie? This double standard is just further proof of the women are wonderful effect. In reality women are just people, they will gossip, lie, make things up, they will want revenge. Both the app and those groups leave a man with no chance to defend himself whatsoever. Fully one sided stories taken as a …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/11/25 08:27 AM
5

Would you say all online feminist spaces fall into this "radical" subset of feminism? Because if you posted in any of them asking their opinion on left wing male advocates you would overwhelmigly get the same answer: "an incel cesspool". There are no feminist spaces that even acknowledge male issues. I'm sorry for not caring then about different currents of feminism. And if it mosly is radical feminism, what does that tell us?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/11/25 02:48 PM
4

Edit: Alternatively, imagine if during a war requiring the draft women were "Drafted" to get pregnant for the sake of the country.. Funny thing is, these people already use this logic as a justification for women not being drafted. "Oh, in case of a war a woman can have multiple children which is what you need for repopulation". As if that's what women ever did and as if that's the same by being forced by the government to have children.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/11/25 08:47 AM
6

Women vote for individuals. As opposed men voting for what?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/11/25 08:44 AM
2

It also doesn't help that men are pushed to take on the dirty, dangerous and physically intensive jobs that women don't WANT to do at all.. I like how whenever the argument of representation of women in dirty and dangerous jobs comes up they will tell you "but men chose to do those jobs!". As if anybody actually wants to do those jobs. Men just collectively decided they want to do hard, dangerous, dirty and often harmful for their bodies jobs just for the hell of it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/11/25 08:38 AM
1

How TF are they "different outcomes" when in many countries women literally get to retire earlier just because they are women? If that's not discrimination based on gender then what is?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/11/25 08:31 AM
12

The only reason the "women don't care about looks" gets peddled is because they care about the other things more. Men generally aren't bothered by women's money and status. Somehow men finding physical attraction to be the most important gets twisted into men being shallow.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/11/25 08:24 AM
13

This is literally, without exaggeration one of the dumbest posts I have read on this platform and that's saying something. How can you say that keep a straight face? How can it be "more" based on anything when it is exclusively men who get drafted? Not even trans people exist in this story, the government just says "you are what you were born". It is literally just men who are targeted.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/25 12:19 PM
5

I know you mean well but this is such misguided view. If feminism did this they would be nowhere today. By tone policing yourself to appease feminists you are just letting them run you over. In order to achieve anything men would actually need to become more radical. Talk enough about something being a problem and it eventually will be recognized as such. Learn from women and feminists even if public perception of MRAs is different right now. The last thing you want to do is to be too nice. Femi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/10/25 02:02 PM
10

How come this line of logic is never acceptable in any other scenario with any other group of people but when it's men you are supposed to not get offended at being seen as a potential predator or murderer because "you know you are not one". Again, try this with any other group like black people and see how ridiculous it is. It is only men who are supposed to shut up and suck it up becuse we are the "oppressor". It's such a tiring and hypocritical argument.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/10/25 10:55 AM
15

I agree the right isn't good for men either but I would not say the only difference is that it doesn't tell them it hates them. The right is in favour of stricter gender roles. That involves men being the providers and protectors. Obviously, not really a great deal that men are expected to sacrifice themselves for women and for the family. However, it is not really pro women either. It expects both genders to play its part. It expects both genders to have their privileges and responsibilities. I…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/10/25 08:45 AM
39

Right, now swap men with black people and try some more mental gymnastics as to why that argument of yours makes sense. "Oh, I wasn't saying all black people are criminals, it's just that you don't know who the good ones are!".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/10/25 07:16 AM
32

I take it you wouldn't be against "white only" carriages either then.
/r/MensRights28/10/25 04:22 PM
28

Is that not very telling that someone like him is not very well versed on the topic of men's rights and men's issues. As if it's some obscure problem that affects a small minority of people.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/10/25 09:15 AM
25

How can it be anything but completely evil when the accused have no way to defend themselves or even know they've been smeared? Because women are wonderful and wouldn't lie. I've literally had people ask me "why would women lie?". This idea that women are more honest and flat out better people is deeply ingrained into our society. Which also shows how ridiculous the idea is that women generally aren't believed when it comes to sexual assault etc. They want a man to be automatically locked up jus…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/10/25 09:48 PM
6

They use that languange everywhere to appear more INCLUSIVE. As in, women are allowed to serve if they really want because it would be discrimination based on gender if they couldn't. Men being forced to isn't discrimination though. It is male only compulsory service, yes. Women can join by choice but who in their right mind would?
/r/MensRights26/10/25 07:48 PM
38

It’s really no wonder there’s a systemic bias when you consider everything else. Short guys know just how much it affects their dating lives and yet they’re being gaslit 24/7 into thinking it’s all about their personality. “Women sense your insecurities so that makes you unattractive to them!” Bull fucking shit. I’m tall myself, but it’s clear as day that there’s an inherent bias against short men. One that for some reason people want to pretend doesn’t exist. I mean just looks at AOC's "apology…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/10/25 07:46 AM
19

What does misandry has to do with "blaming women"? Your entire premise is wrong.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/10/25 07:32 AM
28

I mean at least it's a clear sign the person who says it is someone who should not be taken seriously with anything they have to say. Misandry is defined as "dislike of, contempt for, or ingrained prejudice against men". There is literally prejucide against ginger people. In what world is there no dislike, contempt for or ingraned prejudice against the gender that is considered the root of all evil by feminism? Even when you point out blatant discrimination against men they will try to turn it a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/10/25 09:22 PM
18

It's also how they choose to use data and statistics in one scenario but would be outraged if you were to use the same methodology for any other group of people. Like the whole "you don't know who the good men are so better to be wary of all of them and assume the worst because statistics say most rapists and criminals are men". The exact rhetoric racists use about black people. They love to use these statistics about most criminals being men to create fearmongering and to normalize every man be…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/10/25 08:58 PM
13

So much bullshit in one single post, it's impressive really.
/r/MensRights25/10/25 12:07 PM
3

Why would it refer to a male biased system of justice in that way when that very system is clearly biased against males though?
/r/MensRights25/10/25 11:24 AM
5

Your "arguments" are all over the place, stop embarrassing yourself.
/r/MensRights23/10/25 05:12 PM
6

Reddit by its very design is a collection of echo chambers. If you think you aren't in one you just have not realized yet.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/10/25 04:26 PM
7

Perfect example of why OP's point does not stand. Just because you saw anti Ukraine conscription posts does not mean those same people are pro Russia or that they think Russian males being conscripted is good.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/10/25 04:25 PM
4

I don't see it that way at all. Conservatism being bad for men is the default, everybody already know that. Even in the main MRA sub you will not find much love for conservatives and tradcons. It honestly sounds like you are upset to see feminism being criticized because you think conservatives are worse. As if two things can't be true at the same time. Your entire post is off the mark imo. "Just another right wing MRA sub that does nothing but complain about women" is not only a very simplistic…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/10/25 04:21 PM
11

I am from Croatia and have never seen or met anyone in real life who opposes to male only conscription. Feminism is getting stronger and stronger here but male gender role is as strict as ever. You need to serve in the military to show you're a real man and if you dare to suggest women should do the same then you will get laughed at or be considered weird.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/10/25 08:38 AM
2

Apparently you have a problem understanding what a fact is. Why would anybody listen to what you have to say then? Being left wing does not in any way equate to being a feminist. Even incels are left leaning on average.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/10/25 08:36 AM
1

People in power being mostly men does not equate to "men holding all the power". Not only that, but unlike women, men have a negative in group bias. Just because a woman in power would be biased against men, it doesn't mean that's what men do. In fact, they do the opposite.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/10/25 08:32 AM
1

How does it prove anything of the sort? Not only there is no proof whatsoever he is insecure about his height, he isn't even short! "Being called short shouldn't attack anyone's manhood" when AOC herself implies you are less of a man. How do people like you come up with these bad takes holy fuck.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/10/25 09:36 AM
35

sometimes it’s actually good to talk about what women go through "Sometimes"... it's all we ever hear about.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/10/25 12:23 PM
3

I like how they are forced to play along with the whole trans thing which makes the whole thing ridiculous as you could self indentify with words only. But when it comes to things like the draft then suddenly "you are what you are" and nobody has a problem with it.
/r/MensRights17/10/25 06:35 AM
2

Men do not have a legal right to tell women to keep the baby, nor they should. How do you not see how nonsensical your argument is? You are literally making the case for male reproductive rights.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/10/25 10:14 AM
6

That's a lot of words to say absolutely nothing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/10/25 10:06 AM
3

None of your links actually show that and some actually prove otherwise. Women being less likely to apply for jobs (and getting hired more often!) does not in any way support these claims. Men taking more risks and being way more likely to sacrifice their social life for work will always mean there will be more men at those positions. It's that simple.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/25 05:32 PM
1

"Body shaming is bad unless it's people I don't like then it's just an observation". Implying short men are and should be angry about their immutable characteristic is "nothing personal". Says it all really.
/r/MensRights14/10/25 12:50 PM
1

and men leave while their women are down with illness, disability and peri- to full menopause They don't. Of course you can count on a feminst to use statistics of a retracted study.
/r/MensRights14/10/25 12:46 PM
4

Oh nice, another child murderer apologist. Hormone altered state of pregnancy? The kid was 3, not a newborn. Talk about weak defense. Just fuck off.
/r/MensRights14/10/25 12:39 PM
3

Imagine thinking capitalism cares about anything being associated with masculinity. Most of the shittiest, dirtiest and lowest paying jobs are also largely done by men. Why is it that garbage collectors are almost exclusively men? I'm sure there must be a reason that makes women the victim.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/10/25 02:41 PM
8

I like how when women outperform men at education and work it's because they are better but when it's men who are outperforming women it's a problem that needs solving.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/10/25 09:58 AM
4

Gotta love this idea of "mediocre men" when "mediocre women" does not even exist as a concept because that would be misogynistic by itself.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/10/25 09:55 AM
4

Women today do not face barriers to accessing high-paying jobs because of discrimination and social control.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/10/25 09:52 AM
2

The fact that you had to go two years back for one of the two examples says it all. Feminist subs have 10x more misandry and it is freely allowed. What does that say about their subs and women's rights movement? Or are you not concerned about that? Holding male spaces to impossible standards is a classic feminist move. Now is the time for you to scream "whataboutism!".
/r/MensRights12/10/25 08:51 AM
37

Imagine being offended by the idea of women wearing clothes that are more attractive to men.
/r/MensRights12/10/25 08:43 AM
14

Recently a woman drowned her child in a river here where I'm from. You wouldn't believe the amount of people coming up with justifications. It must have been to hard for her, you don't know how she felt, maybe she wasn't ready to have a child and had some other things in her life etc. I got downvoted for saying if a man did it the entire country would want him dead. People just can't accept that these double standards exist and women aren't universally poorly treated by the society.
/r/MensRights12/10/25 08:33 AM
5

Only a tiny percentage of the accusations are false Using the exact same logic one would conclude rape itself is extremely rare. You say evidence is just a short google away but apparently you either don't know how to use google or you are using biased sources which compare apples and oranges (proven false accusations vs rape allegations on the whole).
/r/MensRights12/10/25 08:28 AM
2

Well done on missing the point again. There are no excuses, Trump never claimed he was for body positivity. There is no inconsistency here, he has always been an asshole to everyone. He never claimed calling someone fat is a bad thing, he's more likely to just tell you people should get a thicker skin. Whereas AOC and people on the left basically treat body shaming as an assualt with words but when it comes to men all principles apparenly go out of the window. And when trying to apologize, she m…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/10/25 09:42 AM
2

It's not about "there side" being attacked. When you make statements like she did the implication is clear that all men of all sides are less of a person because of their immutable characteristic. It means all short men are angry and evil until proven otherwise. It is especially a bad look if you are the one advocating for body positivity and acceptance. It is different to Trump calling someone a "fatso" or whatever.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/10/25 04:26 PM
25

Not equally stupid, it is more stupid. Just confirming that she thinks short men are a genetic waste but you can be a good person and she will consider you tall on the inside. Just proves that she has zero issue with what she actually believes and with what she said. Zero self awareness too.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/10/25 08:41 AM
14

Oh yeah. Body shaming a man for his height, a man who isn't short at that, while implying short men are "angry" because they are short, that being short is bad and that they should be mocked for their immutable characteristics is a wonderful strategy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/10/25 07:01 PM
22

I'm sure if you publicly shame this dude for his height and ask your followers to do the same it will hurt only him and not just regular guys who are insecure about their body. I'm positive that's how it works, especially when the guy who is being shamed is not even short.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/10/25 06:54 PM
24

AOC and the left most definitely fit your definition of "being over sensitive about insults", just not when it's about men. You should care.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/10/25 05:05 PM
46

You are supposed to suck it up. You are a white man, you are the oppressor class in her eyes and nothing you actually do changes that in her view. Then they wonder why they keep losing elections. I've seen people blame it on those who didn't vote. What a fucking suprise that so many men didn't vote or even voted right when the other party actively blames them for everything, demonizes them and expects them to act like it's all their fault. You are supposed to see this and think "oh well, I'm a m…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/10/25 04:53 PM
52

Honestly, the left is even more hypocritical than the right. This isn't just some quote in isolation, this is a common theme. These same people would lose their damn minds if a man said something about a woman's body. Like, even about women in general, let alone a literal personal attack on a person based solely on something that is out of their control. These same people think things like "microaggressions" are a crime basically but have no problem "making fun of insecure people" as long as the…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/10/25 04:43 PM
6

Well it's not just feminism but misandry. See how feminism and women in general are extremely sensitive to anything even remotely misogynistic? It goes way beying getting annoyed over something someone said on the internet. Misandry is hugely normalized, both in society and sistemically.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/10/25 03:17 PM
2

Did he just say "men who get married work harder" implying it's a positive thing? No shit they earn more on average but how much more do they spend? Also married men quitting their job less often. No shit? They can't afford to quit. The entire video makes my head hurt and it's hard to believe it was made unironically.
/r/MensRights27/09/25 08:13 AM
10

Same people think things like "microagressions" are a big problem. They will do anything it takes to justify sexism, bigotry or any form of body shaming, as long as it's only men who are victims.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/09/25 03:14 PM
10

Projection is the reason why so many women think we will never have "equality" as long as people in power aren't at least 50% women. It's the reason they believe this boogeyman patriarchy is what makes women oppressed. They would favor women if they were in power so they think that's what men do.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/09/25 09:38 AM
8

Feminism has definitely turned me off the left. It didn't move me to the right because the right isn't doing anything to help men or change the status quo either. At least they aren't openly anti male, although some of their actions are.
/r/MensRights22/09/25 04:33 PM
14

Let me tell the men out there, you do not spend a dime on video games or sports games or things for yourself until your wife does not have to worry about finances. You come last in the family when it comes to finances. Period. That is your job. Kirk's view on marriage. He also said getting married young is the most important thing. Dedicating your life to providing and supporting women, what a wonderful idea.
/r/MensRights22/09/25 04:30 PM
6

without trying to justify anything They did just that though. Also, men have not been saying women are manipulative any more than women have been saying men are trash for how ever long we want to go back. It's a nonsensical argument.
/r/MensRights22/09/25 03:52 PM
7

It must be misogynistic men who go to feminists subs to make them look bad.
/r/MensRights22/09/25 03:50 PM
5

Why do you reject the idea that women are an oppressed and discriminated group? Because they are not and you are looking at only one side of the story and completely ignoring the way men are discriminated against as well. If you only care about women your conclusion will always be that they are worse off. It is always wild to me to see actual men write things like "men hold all the power". Do you hold any power? Congrats, you are the same as the other 99.999% of men. Meanwhile, the bottom of the…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/09/25 12:16 PM
1

Condoms break, no protection is 100% safe.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/09/25 06:39 PM
5

This isn't a matter of "natural inequality". What is your argument against paper abortion?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/09/25 08:06 AM
45

In some countries, including mine, a man killing a woman is automatically counted as "femicide". In some countries it also carries a harsher sentence. By law I mean. It usually does lead to longer sentences if the victim is a woman either way.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/09/25 07:27 PM
3

Most roles in a war are in logistics so this argument falls to its face again and again.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/09/25 06:23 AM
37

In the other posts she goes on about internalized misogyny. And yet somehow even the idea of "men in power sending men to die in wars" is not internalized misandry.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/09/25 06:21 PM
-2

Persecution complex
/r/MensRights17/09/25 11:24 AM
38

A beautiful example of taking something that is basically a human rights issue, affecting one gender only, and making it about yourself. It's not about women being perceived as weak. It's about societal expectations put on men to provide, protect and sacrifice. Most progressive countries do not conscript both genders. Even those that do, women do not serve on the same terms that men do. In case of a war women will not be the ones sent to front lines. It is about male disposability more than anyt…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/09/25 04:53 PM
10

Is it really outdated though? I mean it's still very much a thing pretty much everywhere.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/09/25 05:18 PM
11

They most definitely did. Conservatives love to portray liberals as having a victim complex but in reality they are not any better.
/r/MensRights11/09/25 08:28 AM
13

The full quote does not make it better.
/r/MensRights11/09/25 08:25 AM
-1

I am glad you found it helpful but he did not stand for any of that, sorry. Nobody deserves to have that happen to them but at the same time, he was an awful person so it's no wonder many people don't feel sorry for him.
/r/MensRights11/09/25 08:22 AM
6

This is why the idea that in general there are a lot of men who "hate women" is still one of the most ridiculous things I've ever heard. Men pander to women, men want to be nice to women far more often.
/r/MensRights09/09/25 07:32 AM
14

Of course, the most upvoted comment is about this being a sex trap for women. Man gets discriminated, women most affected. What else is new. In my country it is very common for this to be a thing. People openly state female only candidates in their ads. Technically it shouldn't happen but absolutely nobody is doing anything against it.
/r/MensRights09/09/25 07:28 AM
10

You've posted many times on here and never listened to what you've been told not even once. People have taken time to reply to your points but you never acknowledge them or respond. You seem to either have some deep hatred for yourself for being a man, or you are troll which the comment about telling your mom to calm down once leads me to believe.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/09/25 08:28 AM
18

Funny story on that topic. Croatia is bringing back compulsory military service for men only. Considering men would basically lose months of their life, they came up with the idea of giving them small hiring benefits. They were so insignificant I remember laughing about it. Basically you could put in your resume that you served the military but there were no obligations for anyone to hire you. As expected, the idea did not last long and a feminist attorney made a big deal about "gender inequalit…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/09/25 08:15 AM
2

I promise you it's not that deep. They just want you as potential cannon fodder.
/r/MensRights30/08/25 08:21 AM
2

It's brainwashing. I served compulsory military service and at that time I was young and it never crossed my mind why did I have to do it and women did not. Why did I lose a year of my life for some asshole to yell at me for zero benefit. You are brought up to think it is your duty to protect women and to protect your country, anything unless and you are a loser with no honor. I mean, not just that but they put you in jail too if you refuse but you know what I mean.
/r/MensRights30/08/25 08:20 AM
1

Relatively speaking it's a tiny minority compared to men.
/r/MensRights30/08/25 08:16 AM
1

Those places most definitely do accept women. It's just that women think men have it easy and don't have the same issues of being treated badly. In short, women can't deal with being treated the way men are treated.
/r/MensRights30/08/25 08:15 AM
2

If you are a man, feminism considers you the enemy. You are just too naive to see it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/08/25 08:07 AM
24

The whole Sydney Sweeney thing with jeans is so dumb but I see lots of women body shaming her now, saying she is ugly without makeup etc. When in normal circumstances that would be considered completely unacceptable.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/08/25 06:45 PM
26

Same people who say misandry is harmless think things like "microaggressions" are harmful and a major problem.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/08/25 06:41 PM
10

That's article is surely medal worthy at the victimhood olympics.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/08/25 06:13 PM
7

Even if that bogus stat is true, which it isn't by a long shot, it doesn't make it a men's issue. What a small minority does, does not definte the whole group not does it make it that group's issue. It's classic feminist manipulation of percentages and stats.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/08/25 08:11 AM
3

You saying something has no bearing on reality and truth though, so there's that. Internet has given any idiot a megaphone to broadcast their opinions no matter how wrong they are. It's funny how there is no disease known to a man that isn't being blamed on the vaccines now.
/r/MensRights23/08/25 09:56 AM
0

You had to scroll down so far because it is bullshit.
/r/MensRights23/08/25 09:53 AM
1

Hair loss treatments suck so much. The only two things that somewhat work are drugs like Finasteride that do what you explained and Minoxidil that ages your face. Not even hair transplant is a good solution because you need to keep taking Finasteride forever.
/r/MensRights23/08/25 09:50 AM
7

But the right hates you as well. The right would happily send you to a meat grinder and would consider it your duty to sacrifice yourself for the country and for women. I don't see how is that better in any conceivable way.
/r/MensRights23/08/25 09:45 AM
-1

No doubt whatsoever.
/r/MensRights23/08/25 09:35 AM
3

Those braindead takes can only come from someone who has been safe all their life and can't even comprehend their country going throught something like that. As someone whose country did go through similar during the 90s, it never ceases to amaze me how many people hold the "why don't they/Zelensky just surrender" opinions.
/r/MensRights23/08/25 09:34 AM
-2

You don't know those reasons but there surely must be some, right?
/r/MensRights23/08/25 09:27 AM
3

There are plenty of videos of Ukraininan women reacting to these videos and calling men cowards. It's deeply ingrained into many cultures that men must sacrifice themselves for women otherwise they are not worthy and not real men. Ukraininan feminists have been extremely silent on this issue of inequality so far.
/r/MensRights23/08/25 09:24 AM
11

There are literally videos of Ukrainian women reacting to these kind of videos and calling these men cowards.
/r/MensRights23/08/25 09:23 AM
0

MGTOW isn't even a movement of any sort, you seem extremely uneducated on the subject. Also we have surveys and studies, most women do NOT indentify as feminists.
/r/MensRights21/08/25 08:05 AM
39

Also not only morally superior but flat out better people. Not even just better but more like perfect. Whenever you see a guy with a "dorky" hobby it is always assumed he is alone. Because no woman could possibly be that way or like those things. Whenever a man is socially awkward, he must be single and a loser. Because no woman would possibly want to be with someone like that. Recently I saw a post on a politician, I don't even remember his name but by all accounts he doesn't seem like a nice p…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/08/25 07:43 PM
21

I guess I don't have to ask whether forced male conscription is ever counted in these reports.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/08/25 04:47 PM
10

Guy dared to be a victim.
/r/MensRights16/08/25 09:09 AM
14

Oh man, you couldn't be more right. I would listen to Dillahunty and he would be so much on point and then when gender topics come up you'd think you were listening to a radical feminist. From gender pay gap to women being oppressed, every single feminist talking point including those easily disprovable ones.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/08/25 06:48 PM
23

It's not a fucking slogan, it's never used without there already being a generalization about men. It's not meant to shift focus to anything else only to challenge the idea that such generalizations should be socially acceptable.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/08/25 06:43 PM
1

He never ran away from his actual obligations.
/r/MensRights11/08/25 05:27 PM
1

I mean, I 100% never would. But your view of those relationships is very naive. A man or a woman does not need to form a special bond with their step children. Very often the kid doesn't even recognize them as a real parent. Just how often do you hear "you are not my real father/mom"?
/r/MensRights11/08/25 03:10 PM
6

It's wild to me how many of those people think he basically secretly hated the kid while he was with the mom. Why can't one just be nice to the kid but not consider it your own? Just because he doesn't feel responsible for her, which he shouldn't, doesn't mean "it was all a lie". He lived with a woman, treated the kid nicely while he was there. He isn't there anymore, it doesn't mean he needs to have a special bond with a child that isn't his. How many parents don't even feel that with their own…
/r/MensRights11/08/25 12:46 PM
12

If you don’t think that looking after someone for four years makes them also your responsibility, you’re special. It fucking doesn't, even the law says so. Four years is nothing. What is he supposed to do, take care of her until she is 18? Or forever? Let's be real, men who marry single moms aren't thrilled the child is there. He was nice to her when he was with her mom and that's it. It's not his child, he has nothing to do with it. If you want to blame anyone for "abandoning" the kid then ask …
/r/MensRights11/08/25 12:38 PM
11

Good thing it was not "men" as a group who set the system up so we don't have to worry about that.
/r/MensRights11/08/25 08:47 AM
10

It was not "men" as a group, no. You have a weird definition of a historical fact.
/r/MensRights11/08/25 08:44 AM
18

> men have had those rights since the beginning of time. Do feminists really have zero knowledge of history?
/r/MensRights11/08/25 08:43 AM
1

I mean, it's the same people who claim that things like 'microaggressions' are a major problem. The reality is that they simply don't consider male suffering to be important. When you apply the same reasoning they use with their biased and misleading statistics to men and end up with a significant number of male victims they still don't care. Because women are affected more, they act as if men don't exist.
/r/MensRights08/08/25 11:34 AM
1

Not a fact. Abortion is not a murder of a human beign.
/r/MensRights08/08/25 11:16 AM
4

Violence by proxy is very common. You seem detached from the real world.
/r/MensRights06/08/25 07:39 PM
9

Username checks out
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/08/25 08:14 PM
8

I mean it's good for you and me, not good for the men who did it. The issue is that it presented as something that it's not. Women were not "ignored" because the patriarchy thought men were more important. It's a take that is as disingenuous as it gets.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/08/25 06:30 PM
22

What women "felt" is irrelevant. Women often feel hard done by over things that statistically are not supported. And again, women have not been "overlooked" or ignored. It's a feminist spin on men being used as guinea pigs in medical research.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/08/25 04:26 PM
42

Woman have more chance to be ignored by their doctors. Zero actual proof Most drug dosage trials are done on men and are not adapted to women Not true and and a nice way to spin men being treated as guinea pigs as a privilege. Also women outlive men because of biological markers. Not anywhere near to the extent it is the case in most countries. Look up life expectancy of genders by classes. Women diseases have not been "ignored", that's a total lie.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/08/25 11:30 AM
124

Men get exterminated, women most affected.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/08/25 08:30 AM
25

The gaslighting is exhausting. "Just be normal, talk to women and treat them like humans". In reality not only do most men treat women like human beings, they put them on a pedestal. They are trying hard to make it seem like most men are awful, and that simply being sort of normal is enough to stand out. Couldn't be further from the truth and what’s worse, the men who actually objectify and overly sexualize women most of the time are men with tons of options, ie the men who women most desire.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/08/25 05:15 PM
56

There will be a lot of 'hey u ok?' And? I'm sick of this constantly being used against men. Not only do tons of women reply with oneliners, many wouldn't even know how to approach someone themselves. Yet men are expected to stand out. A simple greeting isn’t enough to start a conversation. He has to craft a message that's thoughtful but not cringey or clingy. Not too short, but not too long. It has to be original, free of cliches, and funny but not too funny. All of that, while a "sup" is enough…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/08/25 08:55 AM
1

No?
/r/MensRights31/07/25 07:34 AM
6

I've explained it, if you still don't get it it's on you.
/r/MensRights30/07/25 11:59 PM
9

So I don't know why people are saying that. Because every time a man kills a woman people/journalists claim misogyny. The implication is that men hate women, that's why they kill them and why misogyny is deadly. Your response is logical but you are preaching to the wrong crowd. You are right that nothing in the article gives any indication of her being a misandrist. Again, same as a man who is automatically assumed to be a misogynist. You seem to have a problem with a reddit post saying it semi …
/r/MensRights30/07/25 10:39 PM
9

If you want to use that example. If this woman did hate men and killed him because of her hatred of men, then it would be misandry. We don't know. Same as with every other man who kills a woman. But we know the two are not viewed the same.
/r/MensRights30/07/25 09:04 PM
7

Enjoying all the benefits of a society while holding zero responsibility must be great.
/r/MensRights30/07/25 08:57 PM
3

The burden of proof is on them. They need to prove that "misogyny kills". When you count every murder of a woman by a man "misogyny" and ignore all male victims then yeah, you can come to their conclusion.
/r/MensRights30/07/25 08:56 PM
6

"Created a really interesting conversation", like what? What possible argument there could for it unless the person is insane?
/r/MensRights30/07/25 08:50 PM
12

Nobody would think of it as misandry if we didn't have the stupid, tone-deaf feminist mantra of "misandry hurts feelings, misogyny kills" or have countries with literal laws like "femicide" that make any murder of a woman gender motivated. When a man kills a woman it is pretty much universally seen as misogyny.
/r/MensRights30/07/25 08:48 PM
2

Well, no.
/r/MensRights29/07/25 06:45 PM
3

And the general public would find your comment far more offensive.
/r/MensRights29/07/25 06:43 PM
6

I mean the religious scripture stuff probably did not help.
/r/MensRights29/07/25 06:38 PM
2

Contrary to general belief, women can be brutal. A socially awkward guy, or someone they perceieve him to be, is a perfect target for bullying or talking behind his back. They know there is nothing a guy can even do.
/r/MensRights29/07/25 06:31 PM
11

It's always the most hateful posts that call others hateful. Kinda ironic that you are asking who is the one who blames when it's obviously you.
/r/MensRights29/07/25 06:27 PM
53

People say it's not misandry because "it is men who are doing the forcing". Aside from the fact that that is total horseshit, apparently men can't come up with misandrist policies. Same people who think things like "internalized misogyny" is a huge problem.
/r/MensRights29/07/25 06:23 PM
74

What the whole Tea app thing also showed is that "women not being believed" is largely a lie. General public is very much in favour of such apps and believes women would not lie about being abused.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/25 12:02 PM
12

On another sub I saw a post on this app with hundreds of upvotes saying that statistically speaking, the amount of women who lie about being abused is miniscule. People really believe women wouldn't lie. Women are wonderful effect in full force and yet we are being told women aren't being believed.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/07/25 07:34 AM
15

They call members on here incels, they think the leftwingmaleadvocates sub is also incels. There is way more misandry on there than there is misogyny on here. Misandry is even encouraged. The only reason "they are not the same" is because people find misandry acceptable.
/r/MensRights25/07/25 07:14 PM
28

TwoX is a man hating shithole, not even remotely comparable to the misogyny on here. The equivalent male sub would be called incels. What you call "heavily moderated" is a complete block of different opinions. You can trash men on here all day and most you will get is downvotes if you don't break the rules. Just having a different opinion on TwoX gets you banned. Hell, solely participating in this sub gets people banned. Is it that feminist subs get "dogpiled by anti feminist men" or do feminist…
/r/MensRights25/07/25 05:10 PM
3

Not true on all accounts.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/07/25 03:10 PM
3

They say a male version of this doesn't have to exist. Women are wonderful effect in full force. The one comment I saw yesterday on reddit that received hundreds of upvotes is what showed for me where we really are. It was something along the lines of "statistically speaking, women lying about being abused is extremely rare". So your average person actually believes this. Every woman's ex was "abusive" and people think that is actually true. No need to hear guy's side of the story. Couples split…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/07/25 03:09 PM
14

"Men are more violent" and "80% of violent crimes are commited by men" does not tell us just what percentage of men are violent. Which is the only relevant stat considering you are advocating for generalizations of men being violent.
/r/MensRights25/07/25 09:55 AM
14

The mental gymnastics required to justify this without making it seem like women receive special treatment in society would be funny to watch if it wasn't such serious matter.
/r/MensRights24/07/25 06:33 PM
1

Way to dodge the question.
/r/MensRights24/07/25 06:29 PM
1

Are gender and sex not supposedly two completely different things? I don't see how that changes anything either way. Is trans woman not a woman until she changes her ID?
/r/MensRights24/07/25 04:27 PM
11

Just because you say they are more at risk does not make it true, imporant disitinction. Data that we have says you are wrong. YOU don't feel unsafe around black people but not that along ago that was a common feeling.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/07/25 02:54 PM
8

It is very well known men are punished much more harshly for the same crime than women are. Even more than white vs black people comparatively. Your argument very much works against you.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/07/25 02:53 PM
10

I don't think anybody should be allowed to do it. If you apply the logic used to justify this it could get ridiculous quickly. Feminists do not care about trans or gay people whenever an issue like this comes up. "Women being safe" trumps every other card, no matter if it's grounded in reality or not.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/07/25 06:43 AM
6

I've been reading comments on social media about this. Just how discriminatory it is and how the whole thing falls on its face when you just swap gender with race aside, one thing I've found interesting is just how homophobic feminists and women on the whole are. Nearly every comment by a man who asked if men could choose male drivers was met with "grindr is that way" or similar by women. It is absolutely ridiculous how common it is. Women like to pretend they support the gay movement but it goe…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/07/25 06:39 AM
5

So how far does this go then? Can you choose to have a white cashier? No difference between selecting which gender you want to date, right?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/07/25 06:30 AM
11

Women do not face a higher risk of being assaulted or kidnapped. Statistics are clear on this. So tell me why is this reasonable again?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/07/25 06:29 AM
11

How can they verify if you're a woman by the way you look? You'd think at least THAT would get them in trouble but apparently not. The whole trans thing seems to be not so important when there is a chance to gossip and falsely accuse men.
/r/MensRights23/07/25 11:13 AM
3

WTF are you on about?
/r/MensRights23/07/25 07:30 AM
18

If you can't be impartial you shouldn't be a judge, it's that simple. It's funny how far female privlege has come that a judge can say something like this openly. Just imagine a male judge saying "I dislike putting men behind bars". Would lose his job immediately.
/r/MensRights23/07/25 07:26 AM
20

Which is pretty damn stupid when you consider on average how much men like women. Number of cases where "hatred of women" was the motive is in all likelihood so low that is barely even a statistic. As you say, some countries have "femicide", my included, which is painted as a big problem even though 10x more males are killed each year.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/07/25 08:14 PM
12

This idea of women being "hated for existing" is just hilarious at this point. We know for a fact women are wonderful effect is very real. Every study shows both men and women prefer women and consider them "better" people by default. There has never been more "simps" in men, ie those who will do anything to get women's attention but somehow men collectively hate women for existing. What a load of shit.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/07/25 08:23 AM
7

Everything is possible and justifiable when you make things up and lie. Misogyny only "gets people killed" if you attribute every homicide to hatred of women, which there is precisely zero reason to do. Gendered violence has killed more men and it's not even close, and yet here you are downplaying it to the point only women matter. In war zones young boys are literally seen as soldiers, there have been numerous genocides where only boys and men were killed. Honestly, posts like this are not even…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/07/25 08:15 AM
6

What a car crash of a post.
/r/MensRights21/07/25 04:17 PM
27

In other words they want a good looking guy. People talk about confidence as if it's a trait that comes in isolation with no link to outside factors and life experiences. Of course a good looking guy will be a numerous times more likely to be confident than an average Joe. Your response is basically "just be confident and nice and it will get you women". At this point it's hard to even bother pointing out how false it is. This very woman talking about "touching a boob" and your first response is…
/r/MensRights20/07/25 08:38 AM
9

I wonder what a man has done to make her be like this.
/r/MensRights20/07/25 08:25 AM
65

It's not "provocative", it's outright hate, bigotry and sexism. The fact that this doesn't really cross their mind tells you everything about the idea of women being oppressed.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/07/25 07:45 AM
25

Saying someone used to be something is not a phobia, it's reality. I try to support trans people but things like this really grind my gears. Like when you see a movie with Ellen Page and people trying to tell you you are a bad person for saying she was a woman there. I'm sorry that you hate yourself so much that you try to erase history but you can't change reality.
/r/MensRights14/07/25 08:39 AM
10

Considering you can't change your sex that's not possible.
/r/MensRights14/07/25 08:35 AM
5

The reason cannot be an immutable characteristic alone. You can't be uncomfortable of someone's gender or skin color. We have a name for that.
/r/MensRights11/07/25 11:34 AM
0

Disingenuous comment. Making it sound like you have to stumble upon a complete psycho for this to be a thing.
/r/MensRights11/07/25 11:28 AM
2

50% of married people staying together is not quite the same as "successful marriage". 47% of married people stay only because of the children. The percentage of really successful marriages is much lower than you think.
/r/MensRights11/07/25 11:25 AM
1

Who is it "we"? I am not responsible for something someone who shares the same genitals as me has done. We as society already are addressing the root cause. In what way do you think we aren't? You are using the same tired poisonous M&Ms analogy that comes from literal nazi propaganda and doesn't help your cause at all. By the same logic we should be wary of black people because statistically they commit disproportionate amount of crimes. Better to assume a black person is a criminal, you never k…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/07/25 05:16 AM
28

> When men kill women, it’s usually sexually motivated Prove it. It still would not mean "targeted because they are women". Men not getting killed because of their perceived gender is the most tone deaf comment I have seen in a long time. When even male kids in war zones are perceived as potential soldiers.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/07/25 10:23 AM
6

Why would it have to be 50/50 for it to be a problem? That's a completely nonsensical argument that you somehow even confirmed yourself with the feminist comparison.
/r/MensRights06/07/25 11:36 AM
6

Always count on a rape apologist to come up with an excuse for women. How the fuck is whether they are aroused or not even relevant to the topic at hand? So it's fine for a woman to, say, go into men's showers and watch you shower naked. She isn't going to be aroused that much so it's fine, fuck privacy. Fuck you for feeling uncomfortable her watching you, right. That's without even going into how absurd the whole "women don't like men's bodies" thing is.
/r/MensRights06/07/25 11:32 AM
11

"softer facial features" are feminine dude... male attractiveness is linked to masculine features, not feminine ones, and feminine features in men are consistently linked to being unattractive for women, not the other way around. He's unable to comprehend that you can't use woman's body as the standard for both men and women. According to him a man with soft facial features, man boobs and wide hips would be considered good looking. Utterly delusional.
/r/MensRights06/07/25 11:21 AM
5

So you think "most" male bodies are ugly and grotesque and somehow think this is a reasonable, unbiased position. Literally using woman's body as the standard to judge men's body on. Rougher looking faces are more masculine, which is more desirable for a man. Same as fat distribution. Fat going to belly is still better than going to man's boobs or hips, which would make him more feminine and weak looking. Women on the whole prefer so called dad bodies to ultra ripped guys. You are utterly cluele…
/r/MensRights06/07/25 11:18 AM
4

Your girlfriend wronged you in a way that is completely and totally unforgivable. Not what the society thinks, especially not by taking man's word for it. Case in point.
/r/MensRights06/07/25 11:00 AM
12

Oh, don't worry, there's an excuse for that. Apparently "so many men hide who they are and only show their true face later". So much for woman's intuition that is never wrong. Almost like him being "exciting" was much higher on her list of priorities.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/07/25 10:52 AM
20

"It's true that women make up vast majority of murderers of younger children but let's look at this other statistic and forget that".
/r/MensRights05/07/25 08:05 AM
18

Biggest rape and pedo apologist I've seen on reddit in quite some time.
/r/MensRights05/07/25 08:03 AM
4

Protect them from false accusations by already basically accusing them.
/r/MensRights05/07/25 08:02 AM
21

"Not all black people but always a black person".
/r/MensRights05/07/25 07:59 AM
71

Can walk away with zero obligation if woman chooses abortion. What kind of obliigation do they want? On the rare occasions I end up in online female spaces, it's like I entered alternate reality. All these women talking about how they do all the work and provide for men. And how the system was set up by "deadbeats" for the benefit of deadbeats. It's funny how only a male can be a deadbeat. A female equivalent of a deadbeat is a person that needes to be helped asap.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/07/25 07:56 AM
10

It is worse than just men having responsibility to women. I have had discussions with women who are fully on board with the idea that if you are not actively doing something to stop abuse against women you are no better than the actual abusers. So, no better than an actual criminal. They don't consider men getting involved to defend women as good men, they consider it the least you can possibly do because they believe the only thing they need protection from are "other men". And since you share …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/07/25 06:10 PM
6

We are not "made for" anything. You made that all up. Your tradcon ideas are just that, ideas. Not facts, not biology.
/r/MensRights03/07/25 09:48 AM
12

Even if you put the whole statistical debate aside, men are the ONLY group of people this kind of generalizations are acceptable against, even at systemic level. You would never ever see this woman advocate anything of the sort for any other group. In fact, that would be bigotry and prejudice in literally every other situation. Be it race, gender, sexuality, ethnicity.
/r/MensRights03/07/25 09:35 AM
4

Are you Trump? He thought this solution was something nobody but him had thought of.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/07/25 07:30 AM
10

To any feminists who see this post I'm not saying society isn't a patriarchy I'm just saying what the people on here have said. Damn, dude. You are so scared of what feminists think of you that you feel the need to clarify every word you say. You said you were 20. You've grown up to hate your own gender, it's pretty sad but not uncommon these days.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/07/25 03:20 PM
12

Why does feminism have to fight for men's issues? Your literal title is "hey MRAs, how do we solve women's issues". Why would men then care about women's issues if that's the case?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/07/25 03:15 PM
5

What is your proof for discrimination in hiring? All data points to it being the opposite today.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/07/25 03:14 PM
84

"If this concerns you then you are one of those men this app is made to save women from!". Or something.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/07/25 03:11 PM
40

This is the women are wonderful effect on full display. It is the only reason this is even remotely acceptable in society. Women have to be protected and all men are potential predators so it is all fair. And as we all know false allegations are rare anyway and women have to be believed. It blows my mind people can think this but it's the way it is. When I overhear conversations between female coworkers the amount of gossip is just insane. And people still somehow don't think they would bend the…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/07/25 03:04 PM
4

Isn't most sexism "cultural"?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/25 06:55 AM
64

This isn't about Ukraine as such. This is the reality or potential reality for so many men in so many countries. Finland is seen as 2nd most equal country in the world according to gender equality index and you have people celebrating how it is ran by women but if you refuse to forcefully serve you will be put in prison.
/r/MensRights30/06/25 03:40 PM
10

— It is men who are forcing other men to serve and die in wars. Be like Finland, country led by four women 🥰 — Finland forcefully conscripts males or punishes them with prison — The hell u even sayin Funny how it is still men's fault even when they are apparently not in power. Almost like you could make up any narrative that you want if those are the rules. All boils down to women good men bad.
/r/MensRights30/06/25 12:47 PM
5

According to your own logic, women. Congrats on playing yourself.
/r/MensRights30/06/25 09:38 AM
14

Same Finland that forcefuly conscripts men but not women. Got it.
/r/MensRights30/06/25 09:36 AM
5

> I skimmed your profile to try and get a better sense of whether you were really asking in good faith. I think you probably are Really? I took a quick look and guy is using "mansplaining" and every other feminist buzzword in the book. Downplays all male issues, claims misandry doesn't exist outside "hurting feelings on the internet" and thinks men as a group are oppressing women to this day. Considering he's been here before with same questions it seems like the definition of asking in bad fait…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/25 09:33 AM
7

Your problem is that your starting position is parroting feminist talking points and biased statistics that are easily disprovable if you just wanted to listen which does not appear to be the case. Understandable, nobody wants to hear things they've been told and they've believed in are a lie. The fact that you noticed whatever you do will never be good enough tells me either we will find you on here one day or you will end up hating yourself for something that isn't your fault. Good luck either…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/25 08:43 AM
2

What is there to lose though? It's not like going your own way is a commitment to anything, unlike marriage. You can always change your mind and do whatever you want.
/r/MensRights29/06/25 05:18 PM
2

If we ignore how dumb and wrong the whole thing is, why would anything like this "only exist on the internet", what does that even mean? Tons of women saying things they don't mean in real life? Or are they all bots?
/r/MensRights29/06/25 05:16 PM
12

I hate the term "draft dodgers" so much. These men are pretty much universally viewed as cowards and people with no honour, both by women and men. Because they don't want to sacrifice their lives for the state that hates them. I guess if we pretend "it was men who created the system" that makes it okay.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/06/25 10:25 PM
17

No wonder feminism is so much successful than men's rights . And we get daily posts about basically being too radical. "No wonder MRAs aren't being taken seriously, I found a misogynistic post in your sub!". And then you even have men posting things like "we should stop acting victimized".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/06/25 09:41 AM
3

Another thing they love is "whataboutism". The reason why nobody takes MRAs seriously is because there is still misogyny in their spaces which shows they hate women! But feminist places like TwoX are full of misandry and aren't seen as hateful, how come? Whataboutism! Yet another word that is used in a way to shut down any criticism or discussion.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/06/25 02:43 PM
11

In a "proper world" you would never need this. When was the last time in history that this kind of "repopulation" actually happened? It is especially funny to me seeing women using this logic when they would lose their minds at a suggestion of this repopulation strategy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/06/25 10:19 AM
21

"They don't think violently". How is this guy a licensed therapist, whatever that even means now.
/r/MensRights26/06/25 07:07 AM
15

There was literally a post with lots of upvotes that said "I hate men is not a sexist or hateful phrase, it's more of a complaint". In their eyes women are victims in each and every situation and men hold all power.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/06/25 08:08 PM
3

> I hope you go and make similar threads in forums where women's issues are discussed. I'd love to read those threads. Surely you don't consider this a problem only when men are discussing men's issues. They never do, I wonder why? I am really getting tired of these completely different standards being applied to male spaces.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/06/25 08:06 AM
1

Pragmatically speaking there are tons of reasons to expand it to include women. War isn't just soldiers on the front lines. Your last like is pretty hilarious actually considering some countires DO in fact have mandatory military service for women, although shorter in length. Things that we can't change or things that you don't want to change?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/06/25 07:03 AM
100

Not only that but it is always the reason given as to "why nobody takes men's rights seriously". Just yesterday I was arguing with one of those and they are incapable of providing the answer why does occasional misogynistic comment mean the entire movement is bad but rampant misandry on twox and similar subs is defended with "women just sharing their experiences with men". Their proof of MRA subs being "full of men who hate women" was some stupid sexbot post that nobody even took seriously. Seri…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/06/25 06:52 AM
3

But that's contradictory. TwoX and similar subs are full of women who hate men, why does that not affect their reputation? Why is that any male space is held to impossible standards white the opposite is true for female ones? Even the leftwingmaleadvocates sub is considered an "incel cesspool" when it is objectively far more reasonable than any popular feminist sub I can think of. Almost like we live in a gynocentric society where any criticism or opposition is considered an "attack on women".
/r/MensRights24/06/25 06:32 PM
2

Okay so you agree then that all the popular feminist subs are just as hateful against men. You cannot tell me that's not the case when the reason you put everyone on here in the same basket is some ridiculous post about sexbots. By the same logic twox, feminism, askfeminists are all subs full of women who hate men. None of what you've said answers the original question.
/r/MensRights24/06/25 04:19 PM
1

Nobody is saying "don't be a good person". I specifically stated being a good man isn't enough. Not only just "not enough" but if a good man isn't actively fighting against apparent injustices faced by women then he is in fact a bad man. That, along with saying "it's unfortunate the double standard exists, oh well" is not how you bring people to your side. It reinforces complacency.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/06/25 04:12 PM
1

Who is "they"? So again, being a good man apparently does not mean being a good person.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/06/25 03:38 PM
1

Ah, the no true feminist argument. Is TwoX a radfem sub? r/feminism? How come they have so many members with rampant misandry and aren't seen as hateful? Give me a "libfem" sub where misandry doesn't exist.
/r/MensRights24/06/25 03:36 PM
13

It does although anti conscription will mostly be met with hostility because male only conscription is so deeply ingrained into most cultures that people don't even perceive it as injustice. Take Croatia for example. They are bringing back mandatory military service for men only. Males who object can choose to serve "civil duty", aka unpaid labor that lasts twice as long. Those who don't object and serve in the military were supposed to get some "benefits" that are honestly laughable. When that …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/06/25 07:07 AM
4

Ok but what is your explanation then for the OP title? Why is it that mensrights subreddit and movement is considered disgusting while female version is seen as empowerment and yet the latter is more hateful? Apparently you think majority of people on here "hate women". By the same logic majority of feminist subs absolutely loathe men. Why is one seen as bad but not the other?
/r/MensRights23/06/25 05:04 PM
12

Feminist and female dominant subs are far more hateful towards men. So why is it that they are not considered bad? Do you hold them to same standards and why not?
/r/MensRights23/06/25 08:45 AM
11

How is your equivalent to equal conscription "let's oppress women"? The reason most countries have conscription is not just for the hell of it, they need it. And when they do need it it is not in any way fair for it to be male only. Just saying "abolish conscription for everyone!" is not always the solution and can't be done.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/06/25 08:12 AM
143

"In wars, protection from other males". Women really like to wash their hands when it comes to stuff like that, don't they? It's like they have no agency and no way to vote so wars are men's fault. Reminds me of blaming men for Trump being elected when they contributed just as much.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/06/25 07:53 AM
6

This line of thinking would never ever fly if it was women who had to be treated disposably if group survival was in doubt. Speaking of which, when was the last time that was actually the case?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/06/25 03:15 PM
0

My guy called Fox news quite balanced and "not an echo chamber". That's the first sign that you do live in an echo chamber, friend. You do know leftist think exactly the same thing about left wing media, right?
/r/MensRights19/06/25 11:12 AM
3

People often say women shouldn't go to war because they will be SAd. WTF do they think happens to males there?
/r/MensRights19/06/25 10:52 AM
6

Society being fine with women being beaten and sent to a psych ward because a man found her annoying, when the fuck was that a thing?
/r/MensRights19/06/25 10:51 AM
16

I like how women think the "by they are attacked by another man!" is some kind of a gotcha. Not only is that some nice victim blaming by you but you assume everything is a gender war, us vs them situation. Even criminals have sort of a code to not attack women. Average man is much stronger than average woman and yet men are assaulted and robbed by strangers much more often. Criminals are more reluctant to attack women for various reasons, including the fact that bystanders are much, much more li…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/06/25 04:58 PM
3

It is only weird to you because you for some reason think a man wouldn't do something that harms other men. In reality, women have a very positive in group bias while men have a negative one. In other words, both men and women would rather help a woman. Majority of people in power being men does not equate to men being in power nor does it mean men getting favorable treatment.
/r/MensRights17/06/25 10:27 AM
2

My behaviour is the "problem" for what exactly? Your post proves my entire point. You are doing everything are you accusing me of doing and acting like I'm "the problem". When the "boo hoo" part is blatantly true and you are making fun of it am I supposed to care that this attitude will mean more generalizations against women? If I was immmature i'd say boo fucking hoo. Women most definitely do have it easier when it comes to dating. The fact that they are all going for the smaller pool of guys …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/06/25 03:10 PM
37

Agreed. What did it for me was the constant "if you are not calling out bad men you are not any better than them". Apparently being a good man is not enough. You are expected to police what other men say or do otherwise you are in the same basket as bad people or literal criminals. But these same women would never call out other women on anything. Why would I even bother then?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/06/25 05:04 PM
122

It’s yet another example of a massive double standard. Not just feminists, but many women feel it’s absolutely fine to generalize about men but they lose their minds if you do the same about any other group of people. Every single post about gender issues I see on FB ends up like this: Woman makes a claim about how bad and dangerous men are. Men defend themselves, saying it’s not fair to paint every man as a criminal or predator. Women claim this “proves their point” and say that if men feel att…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/06/25 07:55 AM
31

Except the norm today isn't to bash women. White knights go out of their way to bash their own gender. A woman merely disagreeing with the demonization of men will be called a pick me.
/r/MensRights14/06/25 07:50 AM
6

I don't want anyone drafted but if there is mandatory military service then yes, women should definitely be included as well. There is zero reason for them not to be. In some countries men can object to it but then they have to serve alternative civil service which is usually longer and unpaid. Go ahead and explain to me why the same thing shouldn't apply to women. The "men are stronger" excuse doesn't fly there.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/06/25 07:41 AM
2

Tell to the majority of the homeless how privileged they are.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/06/25 04:49 PM
3

The patriarchy IS (but not wholly) systemic advantages towards males and systemic disadvantages towards women. So the patriarchy does not exist then. Glad we sorted that out.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/06/25 04:47 PM
6

are you saying woman are not oppressed? Yes, exactly right.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/06/25 04:45 PM
4

Apparently, using the largest and strongest professional military in the world as an example is considered "the most sensible post." Are all of you so tone-deaf that you don't see what's happening in Ukraine? It's the potential reality for so many countires. Not to mention, there's so much more to war than just physical strength and fighting on the front lines. Imagine describing not wanting to be forced to serve, fight, kill and die as "whining". Classic feminist shaming tactics.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/06/25 11:36 AM
7

It is easy to reject a trade off when it doesn't become an actual trade off anymore. It is still men who work more, it is men who work more dangerous jobs, it is still largely men who are conscripted and forced to serve in basically the whole modern world.
/r/MensRights12/06/25 07:12 AM
12

Most women have historically had very little choice in whether to get pregnant or not Not only is that bullshit but women were never forced by the law to have children. Your comparisons are as disingenuous as it gets.
/r/MensRights12/06/25 07:07 AM
76

It is the biggest case of discrimination based on sex that you can think of in the modern world. Can anybody even imagine a law that forces women to serve, fight, kill other humans and die but men get to be free and get to not do any of that? Simply based on genitals and nothing else. It is unthinkable. Even in highly developed countries that have "gender equality act" male only conscription is considered to be "not discriminatory". You would think they would at least try to make an actual case …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/06/25 06:44 AM
15

Feminists and dodging accountability, name a more iconic duo.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/06/25 12:50 PM
1

The standard of living during marriage always has to be maintained... for everyone except the man. He can work two jobs until he overworks himself to death.
/r/MensRights08/06/25 11:13 AM
4

How the fuck was HE the reason? The way you are phrasing this is that women marry solely for money and financial security.
/r/MensRights08/06/25 11:12 AM
3

"The comments proving her point". I see this on every single post on every single social media platform. It's the default go to template to try to shut down any criticism.
/r/MensRights08/06/25 10:57 AM
67

So when women do it it's satire by default but if a man says it they are being serious? No, you have to be stupid as fuck to believe there aren't tons of women online who post this kind of stuff and really mean it. Just go to any social media and ditch the women are wonderful mentality just for a minute. Go to any comment section of the recent case of a woman cutting a guy's penis or the other one of setting a guy on fire. Women are just as vicious and brutal as men are.
/r/MensRights08/06/25 10:53 AM
0

The idea is that men are already celebrated at any time. And the idea is fucking stupid.
/r/MensRights07/06/25 08:38 AM
6

You basically accuse people of being Andrew Tate fans and then cry about the downvotes. Nobody is downvoting anyone for merely pointing out that women's issues exist as well. Talk about playing the victim.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/06/25 08:32 AM
20

I do know that some child abusers are female Majority of child abusers are female.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/06/25 08:14 AM
4

You will never have a perfectly unbiased space, especially when it comes to the topic of human rights. As far as biased echo chambers go, which is majority of reddit, this sub in particual is very little guilty of it in the grand scheme of things. General public's perception is that "men are privileged" and someone on here saying "women have it easier" is supposed to be a problem now. These two things are not the same. It is especially annoying when the same rhetoric is used on topics where wome…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/06/25 06:22 PM
25

One side is being heard, the other is being mocked. There's the difference for you. Switching to "meaningful conversations only" will not do anything to address this very issue, in fact, it does the complete opposite. So again, why is one side always held to a much different standard? It is always male spaces that people want to be policed. We're supposed to be not skeptical about things like "medical misogyny" and yet on majority of reddit you will be laughed at, downvoted or even banned for tr…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/06/25 06:31 AM
36

Feminism basically gets things done by claiming not only men don't have issues but that males are privileged in basically every way. We "becoming just as bad" is not very relevant.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/06/25 06:03 AM
6

Partnering up and having children together is repeatedly described by all involved as the most fulfilling thing one can do, usually by the people who have done it. How often do people admit they've made a mistake? Very rarely. Statistics do not support this theory at all. More than half of marriages fail. And those are just the ones that were so bad they ended up in divorce. Tons and tons of marriages where people are still staying together for various reasons while being miserable. The idea alw…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/06/25 06:38 PM
1

Point out what exactly was the "hate" in my post, go ahead.
/r/MensRights03/06/25 02:49 PM
4

As usual lots of people are missing the point which isn't really about it "being over for short men" but about the bigger picture - the ridiculous double standard in society. You are not supposed to talk about any physical traits of a woman, it is sexist, insulting and "none of your business". For men though, it's a fair game. And then when you point that out they will hilariously reply "it's different for men, they are affected differently by it!". Yes, because of the stupid double standard. Fo…
/r/MensRights03/06/25 07:50 AM
5

You are incapable of looking further than anecdotal evidence and apparenly don't understand probabilites either.
/r/MensRights03/06/25 07:33 AM
5

Imagine being this tone deaf
/r/MensRights03/06/25 07:29 AM
1

Who hates women, how did you figure that out? There is 5x more misandry on feminist subs, are you sick of that too or do you perhaps live in an echo chamber where hatred of men is justifiable and just "venting"?
/r/MensRights03/06/25 05:00 AM
7

lil man Classic shaming tactics from an "open minded" person. You are fooling nobody.
/r/MensRights02/06/25 01:00 PM
2

Says a person coming to men's space to preach about how men have it easy using the most laughable feminist talking points. Alright.
/r/MensRights02/06/25 12:57 PM
3

I like the title, "strange behavior...". It is strange to anyone who hasn't been paying attention.
/r/MensRights01/06/25 06:40 PM
3

Literally the angriest post in this entire thread. Talk about having zero self reflection.
/r/MensRights01/06/25 06:38 PM
1

Elon Musk is not your (our) friend.
/r/MensRights01/06/25 11:19 AM
5

With this dumb logic I'm pretty sure you could make an argument that saving someone of certain race is more "logical". In so many instances just swapping gender with race goes from "logical" to outrageous bigotry and isms. See "not all men".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/25 11:15 AM
1

Men in power force other men to serve in the military to fight, kill, and die. It is only women who seem to have trouble understanding this. They assume that men in power would behave as they themselves would if they were in power - by favoring women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/25 11:10 AM
4

100% spot on. You see this all the time, women sticking up for other women no matter what and you can tell they think men do the same for other men when in reality it couldn't be further from the truth.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/25 11:06 AM
7

95% of ukrainians I see in my country are women. I do know of some who married local guys. I mean it's hard to say how common it is from anecdotal evidence but in general doesn't seem very uncommon.
/r/MensRights30/05/25 02:51 PM
11

Great, so we can change laws that either both men and women are forced to fight, kill and die or that neither are.
/r/MensRights30/05/25 02:48 PM
37

What kind of stupid question is that? Not only not everyone in here is from countries where there is currently no war but how tone deaf do you have to be to try to construct an argument from that?
/r/MensRights30/05/25 02:46 PM
22

And how is total number relevant to the point at hand?
/r/MensRights30/05/25 08:03 AM
2

In what world does that look playful to you? What else is he going to say, "I'm a president and my wife beats me" and become a laughing stock in society?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/05/25 08:00 AM
0

Candace Owens, what a great source of information.
/r/MensRights28/05/25 06:27 AM
3

We are reading everything, all we see is you victim blaming. Why the fuck would who the perpetrator is make a difference to the victim? You are saying "sure, men are attacked, assaulted and robbed much more often than women are but it's by another man!". And that somehow translates to it being riskier for women. You are full of shit and have zero empathy for male victims, to the point you don't even count them because the perpetrator had the same genitals as them.
/r/MensRights28/05/25 06:18 AM
6

Reverse the roles and his career would be over.
/r/MensRights27/05/25 08:31 AM
6

She thinks 1 in 10 men being murderous monsters is best case scenario. ie it's probably worse than that. This is what feminist brainwashing does to people. She has learned aboslutely nothing from this interaction. Her only conclusion is that she was lucky he wasn't one of the monsters. Maybe, just maybe, vast majority of men are normal people? Nah.
/r/MensRights27/05/25 08:29 AM
13

But it’s 10x riskier as a woman Good thing we have stats that show this has nothing to do with reality. Yet another case of women thinking what they feel is the only thing that counts.
/r/MensRights27/05/25 08:23 AM
2

"Doesn't pertain to white people...", unless they are a woman. Best thing about all this is that the average redditor will tell you "reddit hates women". You have subs like iamthemaincharacter where vast majority of the posts are women. Somehow pointing that out is ban worthy misogyny. It's funny to me how women as a group, literal majority, always put themselves among vulnerable minorities like gays, trans etc. Basically an automatic victim card in all situations.
/r/MensRights25/05/25 06:57 PM
5

Women and lack of accountability. Name a more iconic duo.
/r/MensRights24/05/25 11:21 AM
11

Only a question of what men did to her to make her be like this.
/r/MensRights24/05/25 11:12 AM
17

It was just two days ago that I was trying to reason with this woman who kept insisting incels are going around murdering women. When I pointed out that studies show "Incel" men are mostly harmless and it is the "players" who are the most misogynistic and most violent men, she gave me two examples of incels killing people, yet again insisting they are the greatest danger to women. Then I pointed out that if we're going to use actual statistics, there are more female murderers than ther are incel…
/r/MensRights24/05/25 11:11 AM
1

There are no rights that men in the west have that women do not. Does that mean feminism is pointless?
/r/MensRights22/05/25 10:49 AM
5

Men as a group do not hold any power, let alone a majority of it. Social norms and expectations were also not "set by men". You would never ever apply the "self inflicted" argument to women, because it is fucking retarded.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 10:48 AM
-1

Yes, and the earth is flat.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 10:42 AM
35

Because you never know the circumstances why they ended up there so it's only fair. Men are just born bad people.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/05/25 10:31 AM
16

But you literally said even if you are both aware you know more, you still talk to someone as if they know at least as much as you. I don't see how being condescending comes into that picture. Unless you think only men can be condescending, why not call it what it is instead of a needlessly gendered word that is designed to make it seem exacly that? The equivalent female gendered word would be considered misogyny.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/05/25 03:34 PM
48

I like how there is no conclusion as to why this happens but rather they are "pausing", aka scrapping the whole thing. Let's not acknowledge that perhaps there isn't discrimination going on but rather look for alternative ways to hire more women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/05/25 10:27 AM
39

"Strange" behavior, lol.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/05/25 06:51 AM
30

Why would you talk to everyone as if they know at least as much as you even if you both know they don't? When people who know more than me about the subject talk I listen to them, we don't pretend we know the same just so my feelings aren't hurt. That sounds like an exhausting way to live.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/05/25 06:47 AM
3

It's the number one argument against death penalty but apparently all that logic goes out of the window when it comes to men and SA allegations. Better have some innocent men jailed for life than have some men getting away with it.
/r/MensRights20/05/25 04:12 PM
3

So according to your own biased sources it is up to 8% and you think that's "rare". You think numbers are rare. Let me guess, the numbers are also misogynistic?
/r/MensRights20/05/25 04:04 PM
10

It's a response to absolve woman of all accountability and blame it all on a man. It's that simple. I don't care what your petty reasoning is, it does not make it right and it is hypocritical as hell.
/r/MensRights20/05/25 04:02 PM
8

When adjusted for same worked hours and same jobs women are not paid less. Is that simple enough to understand?
/r/MensRights20/05/25 09:18 AM
3

> And even if we accept the low range, it still means lives can be ruined by just one lie. It's interesting to me how we have people who think 2-8% of males having their lives ruined over literal lies is a positive statistic. For them it's such a small number that it can just be brushed over. By that logic, we shouldn't care what happens to minorities. Gays and trans? Meh, just a small part of the population, who cares about their rights and what happens to them?
/r/MensRights20/05/25 09:10 AM
5

> 2-8% of rape accusations are false. Meaning more than 90% of the time, a woman that has made an accusation of rape was raped. It absolutely does not mean that whatsoever. There are more proven false accusations than the bottom end of that estimation. It's an absolute joke. Using the same logic to prove that false allegations are "rare", one could conclude rape is rare as well. As for usage of statistics. Statistically black people commit a disproportionate amount of crimes. Is it okay to be "w…
/r/MensRights20/05/25 09:04 AM
1

> The fact that this is even an arguing point is ridiculous. What's ridiculous that the hypocrisy and double standard needs to be explained to you over and over. Apply the same logic to black people using your stats and get back to us. What? That's somehow not OK now?
/r/MensRights20/05/25 08:58 AM
3

It was not created "by men" so all your other ramblings fall apart from there.
/r/MensRights20/05/25 08:55 AM
54

We clean up MRA by making people like you leave. Seriously, feminism has shown that none of this is true whatsoever. If feminists were acting level headed and reasonable at all times like you suggest all men do, they would NEVER achieve what they have achieved. Moreover, feminist spaces are far, far more toxic than MRA places are and will ever be. But somehow it's not a problem for them. It is always men who "need to do better", it is always men who need to walk on eggshells. It's is always men …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/05/25 08:50 AM
87

When it comes to abortion and reproductive rights, apparently it is completely fine to tell a man he "shouldn't have had sex if he didn't want the kid". The exact same thing that these same exact people get bent out of shape for when conservatives suggest the same for women. I've seen this so many times, the hypocrisy is astounding. To be clear, I'm fully pro abortion as it benefits both men and women.
/r/MensRights19/05/25 07:49 AM
2

Why the hell was your male privilege post deleted by reddit?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/05/25 07:20 AM
1

You do realize this is just noise for everyone except the people who believe in this one god that you do, right?
/r/MensRights16/05/25 07:13 AM
1

"Allowing men to get women pregnant" sounds like you are describing rape, not consentual sex by two adults. Why does men not being forced to contribute make you "very uncomfortable" and yet you don't hold the same views for women who can even abandon the child if they want?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/05/25 08:31 PM
1

There are nicer ways of saying it but, brainwashing. It's why I never questioned why I was forced to lose a year of my life to serve in the military but women weren't. In fact, I wouldn't even dare to say it out loud even if I did think about it. Men are conditioned to think their problems don't matter and aren't as important as women's problems.
/r/MensRights12/05/25 08:55 AM
4

Are you like completely unaware of anything happening outside of USA or what? Conscription is not "rare". Vast majority of countries have forced, mandatory military service. Very few countries have women serving and it is usually for a shorter period and they are never sent to front lines. None of those things are "unanimously unpopular" because of cultural reasons, aka brainwashing men into thinking their role is to be disposable and sacrifice themselves for women and for the country.
/r/MensRights12/05/25 08:47 AM
8

Not only that's complete horseshit but even IF this was true, how is that not anything but victim blaming? Go ahead and explain that. "Men did it to themselves so it's okay". Is there anything you blame women collectively for or that's just reserved for men only?
/r/MensRights12/05/25 08:43 AM
4

Same thing that's happening in Croatia. Government considers "femicide" one of the biggest problems right now even though vast majority of victims are men and they count every murder of a woman as if it was gender related.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/05/25 06:21 PM
1

The more we pander to feminism the more easily will they run us over and make our issues seem insignificant. I know in theory it sounds good and looks like it could win more people over to our side but it is the wrong move.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/05/25 05:29 PM
20

List all the rights that men have but you don't due to misogyny. Feminist subs are one of the most toxic places on reddit. But sure, misandry magically wouldn't exist if it wasn't for misogyny. Because as we know women are wonderful people and men are bad.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/05/25 11:28 AM
21

Why would it be my job to "call out" anybody, just because I have the same genitals as them? You don't even recognize misandry as a problem, let alone you'd be willing to call it out. So again, why would I do that and why do you deserve special treatment?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/05/25 11:27 AM
6

The only logic that you can use to conclude false allegations are rare would also dictate that rape cases are rare.
/r/MensRights09/05/25 11:23 AM
13

I'm sure she would have no problem with women being FORCED to pop out babies for population replacement. I'm sure her views are consistent on this.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/05/25 11:44 AM
1

Anti feminist, NOT anti women. Disappointing that even a lot of people on here apparently can't make that important distinction. This sub is most definitely not anti women any more than feminist subs are anti men. Literally the only difference is that it is much more socially acceptable to be anti men or feel that being anti men is justified because men deserve it. Either because they are bad people or because of "male privilege".
/r/MensRights08/05/25 08:06 AM
2

While it's something, they won't send women to actual frontlines. Also in vast majority of countries where women serve, men have to serve much longer.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/05/25 06:45 AM
18

It should not give good women a bad name because normal people should know not to generalize that way. Unfortunately, the ONLY group of people society as a whole deems acceptable to generalize against this way is men. It is 100% unacceptable for any other group, especially women.
/r/MensRights06/05/25 11:47 AM
8

The constant victim mentality from so many women is so tiring. That comment section is full of it. "Did you really just refer to women as females". Because that's important here. Who fucking cares?
/r/MensRights06/05/25 07:45 AM
4

I mean, I don't know why would anyone think social media ever was or would be a bastion of free speech. All forums, which is what predates reddit, were always moderated. And to be fair you never wanted to visit those that weren't.
/r/MensRights06/05/25 07:32 AM
24

A few years ago I did this experiment of sorts. I created an account and kept shitting on men. At first just your casual misandry but then getting more and more extreme. Got mostly upvotes, very little downvotes here and there. Got some men trying to explain to me not all men are bad but in a walking on eggshells way, like they were trying very hard not to offend someone. NEVER got banned from anywhere and never got a warning. On my main account on the other hand I've been banned from regular su…
/r/MensRights06/05/25 07:29 AM
3

It was NEVER set up "by men for men" so blaming the godfathers is stupid as well. It was set up by the elite in power which included women.
/r/MensRights05/05/25 10:23 AM
4

Bullshit meaningless statistic that includes playing with your phone which is where vast majority of those female "gamers" come from.
/r/MensRights04/05/25 09:43 AM
32

It is safer to walk alone as a woman. You would think women being physically weaker and all would have them robbed much more often but somehow the opposite is true.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/05/25 08:37 AM
2

I don't see how that relates to what I said at all. You ARE discounting that he was a deeply troubled individual by claiming the root of it all was misogyny. Do you really think normal, mentally healthy young men just stumble upon an incel forum and get an urge to kill women? You are the kind of person to put blame on a grifter like Tate for "radicalizing" men rather than search for an actual cause as to why they ended up there in the first place.
/r/MensRights02/05/25 08:22 AM
12

He was a deeply troubled individual. But you are only concentrating on the misogyny part. That's exactly what the media does and what people are trying to explain to you.
/r/MensRights30/04/25 04:23 PM
8

And if you point out this injustice feminists will be like "why don't men protest if they are bothered so much!". Suddenly none of the harmful effects of traditional gender roles concern them at all. All of a sudden what they call "toxic masculinity" is not a real problem anymore. But when it's an issue that affects women it is collectively all men that "need to do better".
/r/MensRights30/04/25 08:44 AM
8

Feminists hate this sub even more than the mensrights one. They think everybody on here is an incel/fake leftist or a traitor.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/04/25 07:18 AM
19

Brings up the most tiring and easily disprovable feminist talking points and starts the post with "this is a joke, right?". Figures.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/04/25 04:10 PM
3

It doesn't need more upvotes because it is anecdotal nonsese, similar to yours. Beauty is NOT completely subjective, we know that, science knows that. Out of 100 women, you and at most another woman would think John Peters is hotter than Johnny Depp. That's not a "to each their own" situation. And that's exactly what you're trying to make it out to be. Odds are hugely against average guys, a lot of them are waking up now. Acknowledging this situation is now described as "toxic".
/r/MensRights23/04/25 09:59 AM
1

It's genuinely the worst upvoted post I've seen here in a long time. Coping mechanism for some I guess.
/r/MensRights23/04/25 09:52 AM
1

Does pointing out the truth have to "accomplish" anything? Burying your head in the sand does not accomplish anything either.
/r/MensRights23/04/25 09:50 AM
3

That's a whole lot of anectodes presented as facts. You are trying to make it out like high standards go both ways which is absolute horseshit. Standards of your average 5/10 woman are way, way, way higher than that of your average man. Yes, it *is* really uncommon for an ugly guy to be with a hot woman unless he has money and status. Any exception you can think of just proves the rule. Thank god you are not a mod I guess.
/r/MensRights23/04/25 09:46 AM
6

Even in the misogynistic manosphere circles Tate is largely irrelevant now. If someone is using him as THE influence to young boys it's a clear sign they don't know what they are talking about. Not to mention when he was relevant he was the symptom, not the root cause of the issue.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/25 09:38 AM
4

Men are not less at risk in general. It is women who are less at risk in general. Way to get it completely wrong.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/25 08:16 PM
54

It's sort of like asking should Ukraine end the war.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/25 07:40 AM
2

It is pure victim blaming. It is really that simple. All feminist empathy goes out of the window when it's about men.
/r/MensRights21/04/25 08:46 PM
2

The irony in this comment is hilarious. So close to getting it but so far.
/r/MensRights21/04/25 08:44 PM
1

The numbers are horrific. For every two women abused, one man is. Even if what you say here is true and not misinterpretation of stats, how are those numbers "horrific"? If anything, even by your data it's horrific how often men are abused considering the society barely even recognizes that's a thing at all.
/r/MensRights21/04/25 08:42 PM
2

Society does not benefit men more than women, that's blatantly false. You using the same old apex fallacy to prove that is very telling.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/04/25 08:59 AM
1

I mean, you can be an ally to the movement and still have people disagree with you in a maybe not exactly polite manner. No targeting going on here. In fact, if usernames weren't ommited I would call this targeting. The other trans thread the other day had a great post on this. You can be pro trans but you are still not allowed to ask any questions. Immediate transphobe label right there just for saying the evidence is far from conclusive.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/04/25 03:19 PM
3

Interesting how a man who claims he is not a rapist is probably a liar and yet you are concerned about women being called liars. The only reason "you seriously can't compare to it women" is because you've been fed feminist propaganda and misinterpretation of statistics. Any man being considered a "potential rapist", aka the "poisoned M&M" rhetoric is somehow a reasonable take to you. Nazis thought the same.
/r/MensRights18/04/25 09:31 AM
3

Nice victim blaming there. Feminist speciality.
/r/MensRights18/04/25 09:18 AM
3

You are just making excuses and trying to come up with reasons why it's ok to generalize against men but not for any other group of people. The oppressed/oppressor dynamic is so tiring in these arguments. Men are not "running our country" either. The entire premise of your argument is completely flawed.
/r/MensRights17/04/25 06:26 AM
5

I'm also pro people identifying as whatever they fell they are, but so many things don't really add up and you are not at all allowed to ask questions or you get an immediate transphobe label. There was a huge outrage about that woman trying to identify as black. But race is a social construct as well and biologically speaking her identifying as black makes a lot more sense than someone born with a penis to identify as a woman. And yet one is getting completely normalized and you would get in tr…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/04/25 06:52 PM
14

> If you want to reach people, and actually win in a meaningful sense, you have to sidestep that amygdala and appeal to their sense of themselves as decent, well-intentioned, self-aware, ethical actors. And yet not only feminism doesn't have to do that, it actually shows the opposite is true. The way feminism approaches any issue is to make a mountain out of a molehill and see what sticks. Bringing people on board the way you think will not work. Feminists largely consider this of all subs an in…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/04/25 06:34 PM
10

Damn, talk about having a victim complex.
/r/MensRights12/04/25 09:49 AM
22

Certain members of men's rights movement "complaining about the other gender" is most defnitely not the reason we have not had a great deal of success. Feminism shows not only that's not true but in fact, it is how things get done. Apparenly male advocates have to walk on eggshells while female advocates are encouraged to go nuclear on men. It reminds me of the calls of super strict moderation in male spaces, to make us not look like misogynists in the hope feminism will listen to us. That is, o…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/04/25 10:58 AM
5

Seems like poor reasoning to me. Do women need to question why we're single over 30? People say they want women with lower body counts and women who don't just jump from one relationship to another but then at the same time her being single is a red flag.
/r/MensRights10/04/25 09:36 AM
7

> Only 63% of rapes are ever even brought to the police's attention. 36% of those cases lead to charges (or 20% of all cases). There is absolutely no way we could know any of that unless you are treating every accusation as a man being guilty. By the exact same logic you could claim majority of rape cases are false accusations.
/r/MensRights10/04/25 09:29 AM
2

Were you dropped on your head as a child? If this theory of yours had any logic to it then the female subs would be seen as much worse. And yet they aren't. Almost as if there's another reason for it. Even for FDS people wouldn't believe it was real and assumed it was men trying to make women look bad.
/r/MensRights09/04/25 11:33 AM
3

There is absolutely nothing "easy" about him picking up her phone and texting himself. Who these days doesn't have biometrics or at least passcode active? Let alone a teacher with so many chidren around. Literal women are wonderful effect in action here.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/04/25 10:19 AM
4

Woman physically assaults a man: "see, that's just a fight".
/r/MensRights06/04/25 07:24 AM
4

For women the important thing is how they FEEL about something, not what the reality is. I saw a post by UK cycling a couple of days ago about women "not feeling safe cycling" and how twice as many men cycle which is "unacceptable" to them. It does not say anything about men being any safer, they just want changes to the infrastructure to make women FEEL more safe so maybe then they will cycle more.
/r/MensRights06/04/25 07:16 AM
3

It's interesting how women and feminists will straight up IGNORE male victims even when presented with data, solely because "it happens to women more". All that empathy from the supposedly more empathetic sex goes out of the window completely when man is the victim.
/r/MensRights04/04/25 08:12 AM
9

Well, well, look what we've got here. A male feminist using his favorite buzz word to shut down conversation. They won't see it here bro.
/r/MensRights03/04/25 08:33 AM
8

> We haven’t had a draft since 1973. If this is SUCH a non issue, why aren't women required to do it as well? Why is it that in majority of the world men are forced to serve and go fight and die in wars? How does someone post such a deaf comment with what we're witnessing in Ukraine for the past couple of years?
/r/MensRights02/04/25 10:51 AM
8

Going by your own logic women have even less of a reason to "complain how tought is it to be a woman". So what exactly is the point of you coming on here? You are fooling nobody with these bad faith arguments.
/r/MensRights02/04/25 10:47 AM
5

Apparently you are the ignorant one here, who would have thought?
/r/MensRights02/04/25 10:45 AM
4

And if you look at vast majority of reddit you will see men vilified for even just having preferences. Blackpill? I mean, wtf kind of example is that? If you have to go there to prove a point then it kinda says it all.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/04/25 04:23 PM
42

And yet it is women's favorite go to insult. "You've never been with a woman!". As if women aren't just people with their own flaws and as if being with a woman is some kind of a lifetime achievement. In their mind a man is worthless unless he has women interested in him.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/03/25 12:39 PM
5

The people who will use that insult on you don't care about it being morally wrong though. Literally the same people who go on about unrealistic beauty standards and body shaming will use jokes about men who are short, bald or have a small penis. They don't care that by doing so they hurt other, "good" men. Because after all they are all men and men have it easy. You also got that the other way around. The original meaning of incel is the exact opposite. The mysoginistic online group came later …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/03/25 12:35 PM
1

misandry clearly comes from the left Yeah, about that. The right will happily send you to the meatgrinder, they are not your friend. Nobody is. To answer your question, no, probably not. There will not be any major shift back to "traditional ways".
/r/MensRights29/03/25 09:58 PM
9

The system was created by ruling classes comprised of both male and female rulers. You know absolutely nothing about history if you think it was "set up by men". 99.9% of all men throughout history never had any benefits from it, despite you feminists purposely trying to make it so.
/r/MensRights29/03/25 09:50 PM
59

It's funny to me when people make claims such as "reddit hates women", or even better, the society hates women. Just shows how out of touch with reality so many people are. Pretty much every study shows both men and women are biased against men, women are wonderful effect literally exists, we send men to die in wars while saving women to safe places. But sure, society hates women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/03/25 08:22 PM
13

I believe it's not misandry when some women say "I hate men". It's just words with no real power or consequence, just like a complaint. There is no system in place where men are consistently disadvantaged and deprived of their lawful rights. Ladies and gentlemen, feminism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/03/25 08:42 AM
4

So ANY kind of societal issue that came from men (which isn't even true, but let's say it is) is a men's problem and "they did it to themselves anyway". And yet any issue concerning women is everyone's problem and it's men who "should do better". It's only men who are responsible for changing social norms, absolutely ZERO accountability from women. Yep, that's feminism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/03/25 08:05 AM
5

Exact same people who think false allegations are "very rare" also think rape is very common. Logic dictates that you can turn that same argument around and say rape is very rare but you can't do that because it makes you a "rape apologist".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/03/25 11:03 AM
9

Let's be real, pointing fingers is all they are interested to do.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/03/25 11:42 AM
10

Feminism considers ANY men's rights movement an incel movement at best and a terrorist one at worst. Feminism considers me and you the enemy. What you call opening up to the idea of feminism is just letting feminism run you over. Most of "progressives who support equality" do not call themselves feminists, for a good reason.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/25 09:16 AM
30

I'm not convinced. Feminism gets what it wants by doing exactly that, not by being reasonable and playing it "fair".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/25 10:14 AM
394

It's a ridiculous double standard, not just in dating sites but in society as a whole. Football Manager 2025 was supposed to introduce women's football for the first time since the first game came out in 1992. Player attributes have always been a thing, including height and weight. And now they decided to remove weight from the game entirely, saying it's not important. They are afraid factual information will offend someone. That 150cm guy though? Fuck him, let's laugh at him. As it turned out i…
/r/MensRights12/03/25 11:44 AM
10

What women think is "online abuse", for men is just tuesday. It's always interesting to me just how out of touch with reality with women are and this supposed online abuse is one of the best examples. Male streamers get a lof of shit thrown at them, they get mocked for their physical appearance. And yet just one word regarding woman's appearance and all hell will break loose. It's a completely uncomparable situation. Men get abused harder and more often on the internet, it's not even close. Men …
/r/MensRights08/03/25 06:22 PM
3

Who set that system up... Here's your answer https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=eiKOed5Md_o&t=305s
/r/MensRights08/03/25 06:17 PM
3

You don't have to read the article to know it's utter nonsense. Men get abused harder and more often on the internet, we have just been raised to handle it differently.
/r/MensRights08/03/25 06:16 PM
2

Aboslutely pathetic post. You're giving her a free pass because she's a woman, it's as simple as that. Do better.
/r/MensRights06/03/25 08:49 PM
91

Your stance would be completely different if it was a man doing it, why not just admit it instead of dodging the answer.
/r/MensRights06/03/25 08:47 PM
29

Kind of says it all if one can't tell whether you're a feminist or a troll. When men are forced to fight, kill and die horrible deaths, "gEnDeR eQuAliTy iS nOt A cOmPeTiTiOn".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/03/25 09:00 PM
43

"Girls/women are often victims themselves while boys/men are just bad people who need to be punished".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/03/25 08:56 PM
-5

This drivel being upvoted in this of all subs is disappointing.
/r/MensRights01/03/25 06:31 PM
28

Let's not forget the "if a man didn't want to pay for child support he shouldn't have had sex, simple".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/03/25 06:27 PM
6

That misandry even needs to be "recognized" to exist tells you everything. Some people hate on and discriminate against gingers, why and how there wouldn't be hate and prejudice against male gender that is recognized as the root of all evil by so many women? It is absolutely bonkers that there needs to be any discussion about it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/02/25 07:57 AM
2

Because people have figured out the alternative to not being married is not "living life without purpose and dying alone". Chances of having a great marriage until you die are very low.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 06:57 PM
8

She's not choosing just what she's doing with her own body. She is choosing for the child to be born and choosing for the man to be a father. You are most definitely not pro choice. You are pro women and anti men. Always hilarious to see these "don't have sex" comments from the same crowd who lose their minds when prolifers tell that to women.
/r/MensRights20/02/25 12:41 PM
7

About as disingenuous argument as it gets.
/r/MensRights28/01/25 10:46 AM
13

> We have always been treated that way and we as a group never had a problem with it, nor should we. Hey, guess what asshole. You're not speaking for me. You're not speaking for all men. We have been treated that way exactly because we allowed it. It's time to speak up.
/r/MensRights16/01/25 10:03 AM
25

Conservatives: men should sacrifice themselves for women.
/r/MensRights16/01/25 09:46 AM
13

"Yes, black people are hard to be around - not all black people but it’s always a black person". I'm sure you'd be very tolerant about such opinions.
/r/MensRights12/01/25 06:12 PM
5

But it most definitely would be way worse if it was a man these days. Just because it wasn't taken seriously at the time doesn't make that statement untrue today. You know very well majority of people, men and women, still think an underage boy is "lucky" in such scenarios. Why would comments be about women receiving the same criticism a man would receive when it's not true?
/r/MensRights08/01/25 08:56 PM
3

This is the most ignorant comment I've seen in some time. "There's no benefit to be uncut it today's society" he says, as if literally cutting parts of your dick is the default. Surely, if you weren't dropped on your head as a child, the question should be what is the benefit of having this barbaric procedure done?
/r/MensRights24/12/24 08:59 AM
2

When it comes to men's issues, they most defnitely are not. You're burrying your head in the sand if you think that. They are pretty much as bad as each other.
/r/MensRights24/12/24 08:15 AM
54

Physically weaker people should be able to assault others without consequences. Totally normal and not unhinged opinion to have.
/r/MensRights24/12/24 08:11 AM
10

What an awful post. Filled with inaccuracies and bad faith arguments. Do better.
/r/MensRights10/12/24 12:16 PM
4

Nobody wants anyone being blasted on the frontline. But if people are being blasted, why do you only have a problem with women being on the receiving end of it? Thinking men should die and women should be saved does not make you a strong man, no.
/r/MensRights28/11/24 11:24 AM
1

It's brainwashing. They think it's "manly" and their duty as a male. My country is reintroducing military service and literally nobody is questioning why is it for men only. In fact, you would get mocked if you asked that question as a man.
/r/MensRights18/09/24 08:23 AM
12

Men have literally zero reproductive rights. "Grow up and quit this victim mentality". Just because you're a male it doesn't mean you know what you're talking about. Would you tell women to stop having sex if they want to guarantee they won't get pregnant? Of course you wouldn't.
/r/MensRights18/09/24 08:09 AM
4

This is the most retarded take I've seen in some time.
/r/MensRights13/09/24 07:42 PM
11

Yeah, go ahead and do the same thing but use black people instead of men. And see where posting "facts of life" gets you.
/r/MensRights09/09/24 05:22 PM
110

It's way worse than that. It actually said "STOP TARGETTING WOMEN JOURNALISTS" although only 11% were women. In other words, kill men instead please.
/r/MensRights06/09/24 10:27 AM
10

that's why there's a counter offensive narrative going around now talking about single guys being losers and non manly That has always been a thing though.
/r/MensRights05/09/24 08:40 AM
4

It is most defnitely counter intuitive and total conspiracy nonsense.
/r/MensRights03/09/24 08:46 AM
1

he problem is that prenups get thrown out all the time They might but it's not as simple as "prenups get thrown out and therefore are useless" like people are trying to make it out to be. His advice isn't bad.
/r/MensRights02/09/24 12:14 PM
-12

It's not that deep. Not everything happens for a reason,
/r/MensRights31/08/24 07:18 AM
0

Downplaying it again. As if you need "left wing media" to see who he is and what kind of person he is.
/r/MensRights30/08/24 12:14 PM
1

Peterson has gone completely off his rocker. Nothing more than a hack and a grifter these days. Acting like an expert in every field when it's clear he has no clue. He didn't use to be like this. I feel sorry for anyone who finds him a role model these days.
/r/MensRights30/08/24 12:11 PM
7

Alright, now do this same analogy on black people.
/r/MensRights28/08/24 12:23 PM
34

Croatia will next year. And all for men only so far. My favorite thing about this is that it will be "optional for women". They are concerned about being seen as sexist for not including women but don't give a shit about men being forced to do it.
/r/MensRights27/08/24 07:51 PM
2

In other words, I lost the argument and have nothing to say.
/r/MensRights26/08/24 07:51 PM
3

How is that "the point", in what way is it actually relevant? Male victims do not feel better that they were attacked by someone with the same genitals as them, if that's what you think, no.
/r/MensRights26/08/24 07:50 PM
6

Like what? I like how you dismiss male victims and make it a their problem just because they have the same genitals as the perpetrator.
/r/MensRights26/08/24 07:48 PM
3

It's a society problem. And if most victims are male then men are more vulnerable. Doesn't take a rocket scientist to realize that, no.
/r/MensRights07/08/24 04:30 PM
3

It's not in our DNA, we've just been brainwashed.
/r/MensRights07/08/24 04:27 PM
3

same way I would not care if a man beats hies wife if he found out she was cheating. Liar
/r/MensRights31/07/24 10:14 AM
2

Were you dropped on your head as a child? What's next, does he deserve to be tortured and murdered? He cheated tho.
/r/MensRights31/07/24 10:13 AM
2

Why would men need to gain respect from women? Making it sound like men are 2nd class humans.
/r/MensRights25/07/24 12:10 PM
1

only the ultra-left thoughts of mostly young, idealistic, uninformed sheep. Funnily enough, this tells us a great deal about the sources of the media you consume.
/r/MensRights20/07/24 02:49 PM
4

If you're helping someone who is getting robbed you are putting your life at risk by default. Pointless comment.
/r/MensRights18/07/24 09:36 AM
1

Nothing wrong with smearing religion. Like nothing wrong with smearing feminism.
/r/MensRights17/07/24 09:00 AM
1

"Delete your comments", loool. As if the boringasfuck sub is worth even visiting. I got banned there for a similar reason.
/r/MensRights09/07/24 08:47 PM
1

So, some of these are actual lies and most are misinterpretations. But even if we pretend all was correct, it sounds like nothing compared to a list you could make of female privilege. In other words, "male privilege" is laughable.
/r/MensRights05/07/24 10:53 PM
0

It's really the equivalent of "small dick vibes" when a man says or does something women don't like.
/r/MensRights05/07/24 10:44 PM
2

So even in the context of rape you think abortion is "wrong". Okay.
/r/MensRights05/07/24 10:41 PM
8

Says a misandrist coming to men's space.
/r/MensRights05/07/24 10:39 PM
0

What does that even have to do with anything?
/r/MensRights30/06/24 09:30 AM
21

Males being considered worse and more dangerous than wild animals is not a "non issue", even when used as jokes or memes. And it's clearly more than jokes and memes.
/r/MensRights30/06/24 09:22 AM
1

I've always said if false allegations are incredibly rare then so is rape by the very same logic.
/r/MensRights22/06/24 03:46 PM
1

It's always wild to me when conservatives come on here acting like their party advocates for male rights. Neither side gives a shit about men but at least one of them doesn't pretend like they do.
/r/MensRights22/06/24 03:44 PM
1

*You're.
/r/MensRights09/06/24 09:11 AM
1

He is just an antivax moron trying to be funny.
/r/MensRights03/06/24 07:56 PM
2

Genital mutilation apologist. Disgusting.
/r/MensRights30/05/24 09:08 AM
1

Brainwashing.
/r/MensRights28/05/24 04:47 PM
1

In my country it's 62 for women and 65 for men. The gap used to be bigger and they are planning to equalize it to 65 for both by 2030. But life expectancy for women is much higher.
/r/MensRights18/05/24 08:41 AM
7

It is sexist but also a logical fallacy. See the bear thing. You say "but vast majority of men are not dangerous" and then they tell you "not all men but somehow always a man!". As if that somehow invalidates the statement that indeed, vast majority of men are not murderers and rapists. They genuinely think it's a gotcha to the claim that not all men are like that.
/r/MensRights18/05/24 08:29 AM
3

There is a lot of misogyny online. In some cultures, they don't even recognize it as a thing. The irony in this statement considering misandry is basically nowhere recognized as a thing. And no, it's not a different point.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/05/24 03:46 PM
6

You can hide from a bear, Bear is a 600lb apex predator who runs faster than humans. You can tell you've never been in any danger in your life. Sheltered from reality, ironically by men.
/r/MensRights15/05/24 05:56 PM
2

Black people commit most crimes and you don't know which ones are bad. Better safe than sorry.
/r/MensRights15/05/24 05:53 PM
15

Your point is dogshit.
/r/MensRights15/05/24 05:51 PM
0

"Try this", lol. Acting as if you still actually made a point. Try to separate being mad at wokeness from advocating for men's rights. Typing in bold does not make what you have to say more valid.
/r/MensRights14/05/24 03:07 PM
-2

Nobody is a good guy there.
/r/MensRights14/05/24 08:55 AM
-2

Zero relevance to men or men's rights. And what kind of shit metric is "by character count".
/r/MensRights14/05/24 07:31 AM
19

Yes, it's a good point. I personally love it that this bear vs man thing has come about. It actually nicely illustrates what men's rights have to deal with and what hoops we have to go through to have our issues heard. ─ Paint men as more dangerous than wild animals ─ If a man agrees, see, even men agree. ─ If a man disagress he's a thin skinned incel Even having the most logical argument as to why any sane person should choose a man, you will get shit on. Even if they use the most terrible, 100…
/r/MensRights11/05/24 05:34 PM
6

I've had people tell me "if you have to reverse the genders for it to be wrong, then maybe you should stop doing it". Like, they literally think they made a point and it's so "different" when a man does it.
/r/MensRights11/05/24 05:17 PM
5

What a terrible post. Women get pregnant because... they want children? This could only be written by a terminally online person with feminist brain rot.
/r/MensRights11/05/24 12:40 PM
22

Men as a group are not a dominant class.
/r/MensRights11/05/24 12:29 PM
13

These are the arguments of a child, you're not making any sense. "It's not affecting anyone" "What if they want male spaces?" "Oh, I don't see a problem"
/r/MensRights11/05/24 10:24 AM
2

How many men do you encounter daily? What would you say the overwhelming majority of men encounters end up for you? A random man "may" be out looking for a victim while a bear "may" be looking to eat your insides while you're alive. Expressing dissatisfaction over your average man being presented as worse than a wild animal can only be "weird" to a terminally online person with a feminist brain rot. You would not allow such comparisons for any other group of people. You would never approve of sa…
/r/MensRights11/05/24 10:17 AM
4

The fact that you can't think of anyone current should tell you something It does but not what you think.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/05/24 10:09 AM
13

Men do commit more crimes but do we have a reason to believe they are just born bad people?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/05/24 10:05 AM
2

The reason why the partiarchy is the cause of "rape culture" is the dumbest thing I've ever heard.
/r/MensRights11/05/24 08:37 AM
11

I like how they're all like "why should she sell anything????" as if it's not simply a matter of contribution. They're fine with him paying 100% for their house but her money is her own.
/r/MensRights11/05/24 08:26 AM
2

I would not do it but it happens a lot. Men who own appartments sell them so they can buy a house. Then it becomes their house, not his.
/r/MensRights11/05/24 08:18 AM
1

Giving people "free speech" in any comment section is a great idea if you want to make your place look like a cesspool.
/r/MensRights11/05/24 08:12 AM
7

I'd be a lot more left if it wasn't for the left, if that makes any sense.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/05/24 08:22 AM
8

Could you imagine saying for any of those groups of people that they are more dangerous than a wild animal?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/05/24 08:21 AM
4

If you were beat up by a group of black people I would understand your reaction but it still wouldn't excuse racism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/05/24 08:17 AM
5

Rambling right wing political nonsense != talking about men's rights.
/r/MensRights10/05/24 08:01 AM
5

Women are wonderful effect is the biggest problem and that's not going away. Most people don't think women are capable of doing something like this. Even to this day you have people who don't believe FDS is real, they think it's a bunch of trolls and men pretending to be women to give them a bad name. It's simply inconceivable to them that women would act like that. Woman punching herself to frame a guy? Good luck anyone believing that without video evidence.
/r/MensRights09/05/24 06:17 PM
1

You all are looking into it too deep. Guy's just a tradcon who thinks women belong in the house. Nobody is "made biologically" to work anything, that's especially irrelevant today.
/r/MensRights09/05/24 06:10 PM
2

"Never", really? How is this better than radical feminism?
/r/MensRights09/05/24 09:12 AM
3

Not to mention the hilarious tin foil hat take of corporations spending money to "increase interracial dating".
/r/MensRights08/05/24 05:05 PM
12

A guy argued today that even if technically the odds of a random man attacking you are lower, women feel they are in greater danger than with a bear so it's an issue that we as men should focus on. Reality literally doesn't matter, it's how they feel and it's a man's fault either way.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 04:39 PM
5

Only a person who has never been in any danger in their life would think something like that.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 04:37 PM
3

Well, you think it gives them a bad name I believe. And I think it gives them a bad name. True. Although it's not just about me or you thinking it. Very often do you see people claim that men's rights will not be taken seriously until they "eradicate all misogyny". So, it's not a bad idea by itself as much as it is unrealistic. Every single subreddit is a biased echo chamber, there's no way around that. Misandry is absolutely rampant in female subs. And yet people want to come on here and see ex…
/r/MensRights08/05/24 01:51 PM
9

It is absolutely not my problem. It is not my fault neither is it my duty to call anyone out. Again, these kind of generalizations would never fly against any other group of people. Interesting how it is "men" who raised boys like that. Zero accountability as usual. You definitely are saying a random man is worse than a wild animal. If the risk is "high enough" they yes, that's exactly what you're saying.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 11:18 AM
6

You don't see considering a random man worse and more dangerous than a wild animal as dehumanizing. That's an interesting concept. The "feeling" that woman have been given is irrelevant. Women also "feel" the wage gap exists but we know it doesn't. We should stick with reality rather than feelings and emotions.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 11:09 AM
7

Exactly, so it's all about how women feel. It's about perceived threat rather than actual threat. Don't you think then that's not a problem men should focus on? You're basically advocating for men to feel guilty for something that isn't even their fault. You are OK with large percentage of men being considered potential rapists just because of the way they were born, just based on crimes of tiny minority that shares their gender. And somehow, in some way, it's again their own fault because women…
/r/MensRights08/05/24 11:00 AM
9

How would we know Exactly, so you don't know and think it's ok to assume. The classic feminist rethoric of "why are you offended, we aren't talking about you" but then lose their minds when you do the same for women.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 10:50 AM
9

but the bear most likely wants nothing to do with me 99.99% of men will want nothing to do with you. Just how many men do you think are rapists and murderers? How do you not see how dehumanizing and misandrist what you're saying is? If I asked if it's safer to leave a child to a woman or to a bear, you'd cry misogyny if I said bear.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 10:47 AM
9

Men being stronger on average is pretty irrelevant. Every bear is stronger than any woman. Again, if you see a random man and think there is a "high risk" of him being a rapist and a murderer that's completely on you. Only a person who has been completely sheltered from reality and danger, like most women, would think they are safer encountering a random man vs random bear. Only someone utterly detached from reality would think the bear is "much more appealing". It is really as simple as that.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 10:43 AM
8

This question for them is just about our gender and less about race. Simply because it is 100% acceptable to generalize and shit on men and a 100% unaccaptable thing to do for any other group of people. Again, if you post the "black man" question people will lose their minds. Because it's an offensive generalization. But that doesn't matter when it's directed at men as a whole.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 10:04 AM
10

No it fucking doesn't. How many humans do you interact with daily? How many act out of ordinary? 99.9% of men will not harm you and are even much more likely to sacrifice themselves to help you in a need. You are completely detached from reality.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 09:58 AM
3

It's not even about "kill all men" or whatever. There's in general more negativity towards men on female subs than than the other way around here. But nobody thinks it gives their spaces a "bad name". Men's spaces are being held to impossible standards.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 09:37 AM
9

We've seen it changed to "black man" and everyone went nuts asking what does race have to do with it. It has as much to do with it as gender does. "It could be any man but black men commit more crimes so the risk is too big!". That's what the argument would be but of course, they can't say that.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 09:30 AM
7

the only barometer is based on how the individual woman FEELS about it.. if she feels uncomfortable then it falls into the category of "Sexual Victimization" It's even worse than that. For many of those surveys, some ridiculous percentage of women don't even feel they've been sexually victimized. The biased questionnaire does it for them instead.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 09:23 AM
19

I mean, that was the entire point. For it to be derogatory towards men. There is no other reason for this question to exist.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 09:16 AM
19

A bear is predictable... Were you dropped on your head as a child or just sheltered from danger that much? Go ahead and ask "them" this question with different ethnicities and see how that goes for you.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 09:12 AM
16

Look no further than the leftwingmaleadvocates sub. They are hated just as much although it's a more moderated sub and doesn't have as much misogyny. They oppose feminism so they are automatically the enemy, nothing else matters.
/r/MensRights07/05/24 06:58 PM
9

Literally everything you said applies to feminist subs as well but somehow that's not recognized as a problem.
/r/MensRights07/05/24 06:55 PM
2

I will not to tell you to leave her or anything like that in classic reddit fashion. I will just say I'm glad the bear vs man thing has come out in that it has exposed many people and many women for what they are. Had the question been "would you rather encounter a woman or a robber", even men who would jokingly answer a woman would have been called out as misogynists. And yet we have people legitimately making an argument for choosing a bear vs a random man. We have people talking about death a…
/r/MensRights07/05/24 01:38 PM
20

Your "point" is laughably stupid and you should feel bad for posting it.
/r/MensRights06/05/24 05:08 PM
1

Why is... this a video.
/r/MensRights06/05/24 08:15 AM
49

I used to say feminism was equality for everyone but don't think I can call it that any more. I would flat out call it a hate movement today. It's pretty shocking how a movement that is supposedly fighting for human rights and social justice can be so openly hateful towards men. Just how often do we hear "misandry is understandable". Actively promoting tarring of an entire gender by the same brush and yet losing their minds when anything even remotely similar is done for any other group of peopl…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/05/24 08:03 PM
-5

No
/r/MensRights05/05/24 07:49 PM
36

Maybe they should put girls with bears so they would feel safer.
/r/MensRights05/05/24 07:47 PM
8

You’re assuming my exes lives were ruined Vast majority of men would not want to go through that hell. You've made a series of poor choices and now you're trying to convince men they should just keep playing. Nice one.
/r/MensRights05/05/24 09:06 AM
2

People are not likely to attack people either, that's the entire point. You can't be possibly that dim to have trouble with understanding that, right? That women are "scared of a man" but not scared of a bear is women's problem and it should be addressed.
/r/MensRights04/05/24 05:40 PM
2

*You're.
/r/MensRights04/05/24 05:38 PM
2

So you're saying that women are stupid and can't understand a simple question?
/r/MensRights04/05/24 05:37 PM
10

There's absolutely nothing wrong with porn. Unless you're addicted but addiction to almost anything is bad. It's a bad argument. Your life becoming "1000x better" by simply stopping watching porn is not what is going to happen to vast majority of the people. It's like saying watching TV shows is bad. It can be in certain scenarios but generally it's not.
/r/MensRights04/05/24 05:26 PM
16

I hope to forever live in shame And you should when you refer to something like not wanting to be forced to fight to death or to kill a "weakness". There is no point in sacrificing your life for a country that doesn't see you as anything more than cannon fodder.
/r/MensRights04/05/24 05:22 PM
3

This kind of insult doesn't work on here bro.
/r/MensRights04/05/24 01:24 PM
9

In before that PUA jackass comes on here explaining why it's perfectly fine that this only applies to men.
/r/MensRights04/05/24 01:21 PM
1

This sub is "shit" because it chooses to discuss males being forced to fight, to kill or to be killed. Somehow in your head that was a good point.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/05/24 11:35 AM
12

I also know women who have been murdered raped and assaulted Not only is this highly doubtful but it doesn't really tell us anything about "who has the higher odds" either.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/05/24 11:27 AM
14

Most women have not experienced being assaulted or raped, no.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/05/24 11:25 AM
3

What kind of dumb comparison is this? Go ahead and make similar questions about black people and tell me how saying it's "not serious" goes for you.
/r/MensRights03/05/24 07:10 AM
3

Vending machines kill twice as many people as sharks. Swimming with sharks safe confirmed!
/r/MensRights03/05/24 07:06 AM
3

This man vs bear thing exposes a lot of women and society for who they really are, doesn't it? I hope it wakes up at least some men.
/r/MensRights03/05/24 07:04 AM
2

What you aren’t mentioning is who is more likely to be the perpetrator in both cases. Because it's irrelevant? It's still percentage of those men that matters. If a bear attacks you "you guess" you die, lol. Woman in being so sheltered from danger that she's completely detached from reality shocker. If you see a random man and the first thing you think he's a rapist and a murderer who will lock you up in a basement, you need mental help. You're also a disgusting misandrist but you most definitel…
/r/MensRights03/05/24 07:00 AM
2

Also ironic that the person to rescue you is 99.9% likely to be a man. Better hope not to be found.
/r/MensRights03/05/24 06:52 AM
4

Wouldn't surprise me if the elites of our world are trying to cause a gender war by making certain narratives viral. It is funny to me how people can't accept there doesn't have to be a big masterplan behind everything and it's not just women and society being misandrist because they can.
/r/MensRights03/05/24 06:51 AM
3

1/6 is a bullshit, manufactured number, not a statistic. Would you and these same people "not be offended in the slightest" if people took precautions when encountering black people? We know they commit more crimes, so it's logical to be more careful around them, right?
/r/MensRights03/05/24 06:49 AM
2

I'm glad it has come out. Not only it exposes certain portion of women for who they really are, it does the same for society. Whenever you see a video of a woman asking her man this question, you can tell he's walking on egg shells, he has to careful not to say the "wrong" thing. The society and social media doesn't give a fuck about generalizations against men. I'd hope one good thing to come out of this is at least some men waking up.
/r/MensRights03/05/24 06:46 AM
6

Where the fuck did you get "hurting your feelings" from? It's an encounter with a random man vs encounter with a 200-300kg apex predator who will tear your limbs apart for fun. Not to mention a man is more likely to be attacked than a woman is, how much empathy do you have for men's safefy? This is all about you and your feelings. Even if it means tarnishing half the population on this planet. Do you feel safe around black people? Because by your brilliant logic you shouldn't and you should assu…
/r/MensRights03/05/24 06:39 AM
16

How tf is that even a comeback? "Why does the guy's race matter". It matters in the same way his gender matters. Their entire premise around this ridiculous bear vs man thing is based on the statistics that they choose to use. So go ahead and use statistics that show black people commit more crimes. Use them with no context to reach the same ridiculous conclusion that black men are even more dangerous than a bear in the woods. But you can't, because you can't say that. It's only alright to shit …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/05/24 01:15 PM
4

They are the type of person to believe vending machines are twice as dangerous as sharks because they "kill" more people. So the obvious conclusion is that swimming with sharks is very safe.
/r/MensRights02/05/24 10:43 AM
3

It's funny just how much shitshow it would cause if they just changed "men" to "black men".
/r/MensRights02/05/24 10:40 AM
38

Male violence on women is "not sensationalised nearly enough". Okay.
/r/MensRights02/05/24 10:33 AM
117

If they get lost in the woods, there's a 99.9% chance the person who rescues them is a man. They would apparently prefer not to be found. Let them be rescued by a bear.
/r/MensRights02/05/24 10:31 AM
11

How many close encounters are there between bears and humans? How many male "sightings" does an average woman have every day? I don’t really understand the debate. What a surprise that this simple concept is lost on you.
/r/MensRights02/05/24 10:28 AM
4

It is really something that there are still men who think this is a good deal. Marrying a woman who wants a provider, a protector and will not work. What could possibly go wrong.
/r/MensRights01/05/24 09:36 AM
5

Divorce statistics say your theory is bullshit.
/r/MensRights01/05/24 09:34 AM
4

How did covid specifically made you realize feminism is a scam? That's kinda odd. Was it the fact that a lot more men died but they tried to paint it like women were most affected?
/r/MensRights01/05/24 09:32 AM
1

Absolute nonsense. It's both men and women saying it. What do you gain from lying about it?
/r/MensRights30/04/24 11:06 PM
4

You're a bit slow, aren't you?
/r/MensRights30/04/24 11:03 PM
5

Do you always have the worst take on every possible topic? Your "huge green flag" is literally the point of matching.
/r/MensRights30/04/24 10:58 PM
43

Dating for women is like going shopping. Dating for men is more similar to a job interview.
/r/MensRights30/04/24 10:55 PM
11

I like how they also argue that the apex fallacy is a "myth".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/04/24 04:42 PM
8

More than anything this bear thing shows you just how shielded from reality and danger modern women are.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/04/24 04:40 PM
11

A woman is far more likely to be attacked by someone she knows or who she's with than by a complete stranger. I'm not saying being careful and taking precautions is bad but there's a massive hysteria around women safety in public even though it's not grounded in reality.
/r/MensRights30/04/24 10:57 AM
22

I don't know how men put up with it to be honest. I saw a video of a woman asking her husband this question and as soon as he started explaining she would be safer with a man because he knows he would never do anything like that she interrupts him with "but you're assuming other men are like you". As opposed to what, assuming all men are rapists? I'd run like crazy if a woman I was with asked me that question in a serious manner.
/r/MensRights30/04/24 10:12 AM
17

The bear thing tells you all you really need to know. Not only in reality a man in the woods would help a woman, he would far more likely be willing to sacrifice himself to help her rather than be a rapist and a murderer. One woman said should would rather be attacked by a bear because "at least people would believe her". As if the escaping from a bear attack part is the least of her worries, it's more important that she is believed. It just goes to show you how shielded from danger and reality …
/r/MensRights30/04/24 10:10 AM
2

I've just now realized this guy is the loser who followed me to a video game sub and tried to use me posting there as some kind of a "gotcha". Fucking lol. Helping men my ass. He's here to advertise his "services".
/r/MensRights29/04/24 08:08 PM
1

When was the last time human species survival was in question?
/r/MensRights29/04/24 08:04 PM
17

Whenever shit hits the fan women and children are prioritized. With rescuers being largely men, but that's another story. Male expendability is well known, just look at any war ever.
/r/MensRights29/04/24 03:45 PM
13

I know right, so ridiculous that it's still true to this day.
/r/MensRights29/04/24 03:24 PM
77

If you listen to the actual transcript of the Titanic morse code SOS call, one of the first things they mention is that they are "getting women into boats". We also know that they tried to prevent men from getting into lifeboats and the plan was only after women and children were saved would they try saving men. The small number of men who did survive in the end were labelled "cowards". There's literally zero reason for any of this to ever be a thing except that the society values women a lot mo…
/r/MensRights29/04/24 02:35 PM
7

The privileged part is 100% true at least. Western white women are the most privileged group of people on the planet.
/r/MensRights29/04/24 07:49 AM
2

Ah yes, all things that are highly subjective and depend entirely on what woman feels about it. What could possibly go wrong with a law like this?
/r/MensRights29/04/24 07:45 AM
2

No.
/r/MensRights28/04/24 07:44 PM
3

1: If you let criticism of feminism go unchecked, the subbreddit slowly devolves into women-hating instead of focusing on ways to help men, or about problems men are facing. Are there any feminist spaces where criticism of mensrights is being kept in check? It seems men's spaces are being held to unrealistic, if not impossible standards while the same isn't true for women at all. If you ban all criticism of women then all that would change is that smaller issues become "misogyny" now. This very …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/04/24 10:38 AM
18

Tightening my tinfoil hat, it all seems to be correlated with depopulation agendas. I like how people think there has to be a masterplan behind everything when reality is so much simpler.
/r/MensRights27/04/24 11:03 PM
21

Reading the comments is pretty funny actually. Men are gross I agree. *clicks on their profile* Relationship: Single Well, that's a shocker.
/r/MensRights27/04/24 07:06 AM
2

Ridiculous, simplistic take.
/r/MensRights27/04/24 07:00 AM
4

Good thing we know for a fact women are more picky and don't rate men on a bell curve like men rate women. So while your conclusion that not all men and women want the same thing is true, it's also irrelevant because it's not a 50/50 situation. Nobody asked how to be more attractive either so I don't even know where are you going with this.
/r/MensRights26/04/24 10:47 AM
8

And yet people lose their minds over female circumcision. That's the entire point you moron.
/r/MensRights26/04/24 10:23 AM
2

"Page". OK grandpa.
/r/MensRights26/04/24 10:21 AM
6

Imagine being this dim.
/r/MensRights26/04/24 10:21 AM
7

I don't think you can tell anything of the sort by looking at their eyes.
/r/MensRights24/04/24 02:05 PM
3

These are the most pathetic replies.
/r/MensRights24/04/24 01:55 PM
1

You're viewing everything from a misogynist... Fucking yawn.
/r/MensRights23/04/24 05:35 PM
3

Even if we set aside the fact that the difference is statistically insignificant, imagine a headline that says "why you want a male doctor".
/r/MensRights23/04/24 05:26 PM
7

This reasoning is so bad it's actually incredible.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/04/24 07:57 AM
19

Even their "gotcha" answer, that men set it up, does not change anything. Men do dangerous jobs so women don't have to. Their mistake is thinking that a system set up by a man is the system that will benefit a man, because that's something they would do. Projection. And even in case the argument is that "men did it to themselves" that sound like victim blaming and lack of empathy to me.
/r/MensRights20/04/24 09:55 AM
5

Always the same story of people wanting to hold men's spaces to impossible standards. Should there be less negativity towards women on here? Definitely and yes it would make it a better place. But you can't ignore the rampant misandry in women's spaces and then somehow make it sound like MRA movement will not be taken seriously unless all content is 100% level headed and unbiased. Toxicity towards men certainly did not and does not harm feminist subs in any way.
/r/MensRights20/04/24 09:46 AM
4

Are you posting this from a kitchen?
/r/MensRights20/04/24 09:38 AM
2

Cringe. The only reason arranged marriages have higher "success rate" is because in those cultures divorce is highly frowned upon.
/r/MensRights19/04/24 02:01 PM
7

And speaking of Penny and Leonard from Bigbang. He has PhD in physics, is hard working and overall a very good, polite guy. She's a waitress and a failed actress, lazy and portrayed as having a bitchy attitude. And yet everyone thinks HE is lucky to have her.
/r/MensRights19/04/24 09:54 AM
4

This sub really likes to overstate how much biology and instincts come into it. Like the whole "we're meant to protect" thing. In reality it's mostly programming.
/r/MensRights17/04/24 05:47 PM
3

You could use your brain perhaps? I would try that first.
/r/MensRights17/04/24 05:38 PM
4

we'll reserve ours for those who have more to give than childish resentment. And yet you still never do it. It's a very popular saying among women these days that even the good guys aren't good if they don't stand up to the bad ones. I've been told by a woman that I'm no better than women abusers if I'm not actively calling out bad men. If that's the standard you want to apply to the whole gender, or in this case sub, then your support doesn't mean much. It's like man's entire worth is measured …
/r/MensRights17/04/24 08:25 AM
2

My favorite is when a woman posts a "cringe" message she got from her "audience". And everyone on reddit is like "ewwwww, what a creep". Like, who do you expect you're making money off? They despise those desperate, lonely guys but still love their money.
/r/MensRights16/04/24 03:28 PM
4

What then is your response to these women who are genuinely terrified of being kidnapped and murdered like we see here? I'd tell them their fears are unfounded as nobody can live a life with any guarantees. Statistically, men are more likely to be assaulted and murdered. Of course, that you don't consider a man's life to be equally valuable is another thing altogether.
/r/MensRights16/04/24 03:25 PM
42

True although I reckon even just pretending that anybody cares is better than nothing. We need to normalize the word misandry.
/r/MensRights16/04/24 03:18 PM
2

Funny how not marrying is "choosing money over love". Like, even in your own words it is implied marriage is a financially terrible decision to make but you're still advising people to do it just because.
/r/MensRights16/04/24 01:06 PM
2

Marriage has many financial and legal benefits Like what? You haven't named one. It should be easy considering there are "many". The kind of prenup you're talking about will get thrown out immediately. It doesn't seem you know what you're talking about.
/r/MensRights16/04/24 01:02 PM
12

Last time we were talking about this there was a person claiming that this was done because women kept getting kidnapped in parking lots. Which is of course, complete nonsense. In reality it doesn't achieve anything but spread fearmongering.
/r/MensRights15/04/24 02:16 PM
6

No, these are literally for women. No pregnancy involved.
/r/MensRights15/04/24 02:11 PM
2

OK but that's no proof of Youtube "throttling". We're better than this.
/r/MensRights15/04/24 07:30 AM
26

It's very much a thing where I live. Landlords will openly state they rent to women only and we can't really do anything about it.
/r/MensRights14/04/24 07:54 PM
4

Funny thing is, they had to do make it "optional" just so it isn't sexist... to women! So making it male only would only be bad from the "not inclusive" point of view, not the fact that half the people are forced to do it based on their gender alone. I can tell you there will be precisely 0 women doing it willingly.
/r/MensRights14/04/24 07:50 PM
6

Majority of perpetrators being men does not change anything though?
/r/MensRights14/04/24 07:40 PM
8

100% brainwashing and people aren't even aware of it. "Oh well, we're brought up with the idea of us being the protectors" <- Literal programming there. It's not misandry, it's just practical, man!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/24 03:53 PM
7

Absolutely but it's very hard due to programming and brainwashing. It feels like there's at least a chance one could organize a protest against the mandatory service but definitely not in the context of gender inequality.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/24 03:50 PM
12

Don't you think that's terrible reasoning though? "Men are stronger in general so they should go fight and die". One of the biggest violations of human rights and we're brushing it off as if it's reasonable.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/24 03:45 PM
9

We know for a fact that society on the whole cares much more about women. I think some people don't even realize their biases as it is so normal to them that life of a man and his well-being is a lot less important.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/24 11:13 AM
8

it would be a tremendous scandal. Somehow sending men to die in wars against their will based on their genitals is "not misandry" but imagine what would this birth conscription be described as. It's unthinkable.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/24 11:05 AM
5

It's like beating your head against a brick wall Feminism making a mountain out of a molehill out of tiniest issues and succeeding but let's defend sending half the population to die horrible deaths in wars based on their genitals. Like beating your head against a brick wall indeed.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/24 11:02 AM
17

It will be for men only and I have not seen a single man on here question it. Most are against the military service but nobody would dare to even suggest it shouldn't be for males only. If I said that I would be shamed into oblivion for not being a "real man".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/24 10:57 AM
5

What the fuck do you think happens to males in the case of captivity? Is that that you don't know that they get tortured, raped and killed or that you don't care because they are men?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/24 10:55 AM
6

Always the same talk about women on the front lines conveniently ignoring that fact that for every soldier fighting there are 5-10 positions in logistics that women could do just as good as men. Not even women would agree their most important duty in war is "making babies". You are most definitely not "for having serious discussions about men's rights" if treating men as cannon fodder is acceptable in your opinion. Your views are misandrist and harmful for men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/24 10:53 AM
6

Yes, let's not see the bigger picture but focus on something OP never claimed happened instead.
/r/MensRights13/04/24 08:48 AM
1

And the male equivalent of these groups would not be called just incels but literal terrorists.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/04/24 09:28 AM
1

How are anti paper abortion arguments always so bad? Case in point: Nobody is forcing men to have sex, there is always a chance of pregnancy and that's the risk both parties take. I bet this same person would lose their shit if you said nobody is forcing women to have sex so they don't need abortion. Also "the risk both parties take" but only one can do anything about it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/04/24 12:39 PM
0

Abortion is a "right" nobody should have Says a person pretending to care about men's rights. This entire comment section does prove how hypocritical a lot of people on here are.
/r/MensRights10/04/24 08:18 AM
1

You thinking abortions are "horrific" is just your feelings as well.
/r/MensRights10/04/24 08:12 AM
3

This is 100% backwards. Women having no right to abortion will just make it 100 times harder to men ever have reproductive rights.
/r/MensRights10/04/24 08:10 AM
0

Anyone who celebrates this decision doesn't really care much about men's rights but just wants to "get one over women". Even if it didn't affect men it would still be a wrong thing to support but it actually does and in a big way.
/r/MensRights10/04/24 07:58 AM
1

Because two wrongs don't make a right, as simple as that. And not only that, but women having no choice directly affects men too.
/r/MensRights10/04/24 07:56 AM
4

Not only is this bad for everyone but it is also definitely a bad thing for men. This "men have zero reproductive rights sooo" line of thinking that seems to be common in this thread is very misguided. We should be looking at a bigger picture than "getting one over women".
/r/MensRights10/04/24 07:52 AM
10

I mean, you're obviously fucked in the head. But also even when we set aside the fact that you're OK with adult women raping kids, how the fuck does attractiveness come into it as well?
/r/MensRights10/04/24 07:39 AM
-1

"Improve". No,
/r/MensRights09/04/24 02:21 PM
4

How is there anyone who thinks this is a good idea? Would you want to be with someone who's only with you because others decided it? If so, fucking yikes.
/r/MensRights09/04/24 02:19 PM
6

If this helps, her being his wife doesn't change anything. She is not his possession and if she doesn't want to be touched or groped it shouldn't happen. His "needs" have nothing to do with it.
/r/MensRights08/04/24 02:12 PM
7

A fair sample of feminists? I mean, there is no doubt vast majority of feminists agree with this so... I don't know.
/r/MensRights08/04/24 02:08 PM
1

The point is stupid in both ways.
/r/MensRights07/04/24 06:54 PM
6

Of course there are deranged paedophile apologists in that comment section that "wish they were molested" when they were kids.
/r/MensRights07/04/24 02:12 PM
1

Both things can be and are true. Wokeism is a thing but also the fight for equal rights and social justice is necessary as well. Kind of like most people on here are for equal rights for women but do not agree with feminism. If your reply to this would be "well, wokeism is just fight for those things" it is again the same thing as saying feminism is just fight for women's rights and nothing else. I see what you're trying to say with the right wing media labeling everything as woke though and it'…
/r/MensRights07/04/24 11:07 AM
-2

So does right wing though.
/r/MensRights07/04/24 10:56 AM
13

Feminists like to go on how dark the times were for women in the past but here's one awful statistic about WW2: If you were a Soviet male born in 1923, you had a 20% chance to live to see your 22nd birthday. Not 20% chance of dying, which would be terrible by itself. A 20% chance of living enough to celebrate your 22nd. And yet, they will never accept that males are treated as disposable humans and have always been.
/r/MensRights07/04/24 10:54 AM
-6

That doesn't make much sense. That's been the case in almost every war ever.
/r/MensRights07/04/24 10:49 AM
10

Women are perfectly suited for logistics positions in the military and yet are not forced to do it. If women were more suited for combat I'm sure they'd be up in the front lines along with the men Very naive.
/r/MensRights07/04/24 10:46 AM
3

I did, you lose. Remember that America is not the world and that a lot of people on here are not American. Lots of countries have mandatory military service for men.
/r/MensRights07/04/24 10:44 AM
1

No, not only is it not population thing "mostly", it's not a population thing at all.
/r/MensRights07/04/24 10:40 AM
1

I don't know what kind of response I'm going to get in a feminist leaning subreddit. Everyone already knows what kind of response you're going to get but I guess we have to let you learn it by yourself. That is, if they even let you post on there at all considering you've posted on here at least once.
/r/MensRights07/04/24 08:59 AM
2

You do know that's what most divorced people thought they were getting into, right?
/r/MensRights07/04/24 08:07 AM
13

Western white women is the most privileged group of people on this planet. Something tells me you're part of that group in which case, check your privilege.
/r/MensRights06/04/24 11:34 AM
16

"How come this sub talks about women so much. No wonder men's issues are not taken seriously if you're just hating on women!". Every time a feminist comes on here. Because they totally never talk about men, how bad men are and the misandry in their spaces totally affects how seriously is feminism being taken.
/r/MensRights06/04/24 10:31 AM
8

"Accepting your body" apparently makes top of the list of what it means to be a woman.
/r/MensRights06/04/24 10:26 AM
18

Men have literally zero reproductive rights. Woman decides if the kid is going to be born and whether they both will be parents or not. Men who leave cannot legally abandon their children.
/r/MensRights05/04/24 08:49 AM
19

Imagine thinking THAT'S a gotcha comment.
/r/MensRights05/04/24 08:46 AM
29

How do you come on here and then argue the most simple, dumbest point that you possibly can? It is everyone who is forcing men to go to war, not "other men". And even if this stupid logic of yours was true, does that make it any better for the average man? The point isn't that "women are at fault". It changes literally nothing except you feminists treating it as a gender war in any instance possible. It would be the same as saying "it's your own fault lol" when a female politician makes a change…
/r/MensRights05/04/24 08:44 AM
41

Nothing you do will be enough to differentiate yourself. The moment you question feminism you're the enemy, that's it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/04/24 09:21 AM
1

So much bullshit in one single post, it's impressive honestly.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 09:10 AM
1

That's an outright lie. Black men having it worse is very often brought up and nobody disagrees with it.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 09:00 AM
112

There are many instances that we use the "imagine if genders were reversed" to point out the double standard but in this case it's not even possible because it's literally unthinkable. Imagine a law that forces women to fight to horrible deaths but men get to walk free. Literally just based on gender, nothing else. It's not even imaginable.
/r/MensRights03/04/24 08:12 AM
21

Remember the "STOP TARGETTING WOMEN JOURNALISTS" tweet by UN Women that literally showed 90% of killed journalists were men. So not even a "stop killing journalists" message, but specifically don't kill women. If it's a man then go ahead.
/r/MensRights03/04/24 07:48 AM
3

I'm not convinced by this biological angle much to be honest. So many traits that we consider universally biological are largely sociocultural. Even the one with men being natural protectors of women, I don't think biology is the full story. When I was serving the compulsory military service I wasn't asking myself "why me and not women", not because it was my instinct but because I was raised that way, or more accurately, brainwashed into thinking I'm a man and it needs to be done.
/r/MensRights02/04/24 01:56 PM
5

I mean how do you even approach discussing men's rights without bringing women's side into it? What would feminism be like if you told them to "stop comparing yourself to men". Ironically, what you're doing here is yet another double standard.
/r/MensRights02/04/24 01:45 PM
11

Is this supposed to make feminists look good on this topic? Looking at the "it's an unworkable solution" reply. The poster Celda lays out logical arguments to which the person he's replying to keeps posting shorter and shorter replies and at a certain point says "you know nothing about anything which isn't a surprise since you're an MRA" and keeps acting like a child from then on. The "Kids have a right to support. How it comes most of us don't particularly care" reply is the closest to truth in…
/r/MensRights02/04/24 09:19 AM
3

Who is "us"?
/r/MensRights01/04/24 05:42 PM
1

It's a dogshit video designed to generate outrage.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 04:43 PM
1

Moreover, most conservatives do not support men's rights, no matter what they say.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 04:39 PM
2

Embarrassing.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 04:38 PM
9

Username doesn't check out.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 04:29 PM
4

But how could that be when women are wonderful and it's men who are spreading hate?
/r/MensRights01/04/24 07:44 AM
3

You sound worse than feminists.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 07:35 AM
4

Almost like we’re groomed to self sacrifice We most certainly are. When I was serving the mandatory military service not only I never questioned why me and not women, but even just thinking about it would have made me feel like I'm not a real man.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/03/24 11:54 AM
14

I mean, you can see it even on those who come on here. I do believe that women probably have to deal with issues that we aren't aware of and that there are pros and cons to being a man or a woman but when you straight out ask them what are those privileges that according to them men have and what is it that women are being oppressed at, things like "certain female products are more expensive" almost always makes it near top of those lists. If that is one of the biggest "systemical" problems you'…
/r/MensRights31/03/24 11:50 AM
3

It is an outdated concept that should not exist anymore.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/03/24 09:10 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter