TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

KROMExRainbow Archive

View 0 posts and 24 comments by KROMExRainbow on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I mean, I do agree with your sentiment, but she definitely didn't present it in a great way. I'm personally not likely to get married, but I also wouldn't go around telling people that they fucked up, criticising their decision to get married. It all felt very Redpill/MGTOW and so I can see why the other dude called her an incel.
/r/MensRights02/12/21 01:28 AM
12

Am I missing something? Nothing about the term "involuntary celibate" suggests that the person being described as such is a man. Can a woman not also be an incel?
/r/MensRights01/12/21 08:58 PM
3

Keep in mind that, in that case, you've probably got a much higher body fat percentage. Don't expect to lose 10 pounds and look shredded, because it's not going to happen. The reality is more so that he might have 25lbs less of fat, but 15lbs more of muscle, meaning he's only 10lbs lighter overall, but will have a completely different body composition.
/r/seduction21/11/21 07:35 AM
1

Ah, but is the average rent in South Africa $540 a week ($2,160 a month)? We get paid more here, but I'd also imagine stuff is a lot more expensive here too!
/r/MensRights12/09/21 10:09 PM
5

There's definitely a bunch of issues with this, but the pay isn't one of them. That's definitely par for the course for a street sweeper here in Australia, especially in a capital city like Melbourne.
/r/MensRights09/09/21 11:15 PM
355

The funniest part is that pretty much every guy on that season of Love Island has been fantastic. They're incredibly respectful, gentlemanly and honest. The women, for the most part, were immature, disrespectful and just plain ridiculous. It mellows out as the season progresses, but the difference is hugely noticeable at the start.
/r/MensRights01/08/19 01:13 PM
3

It was singling out a gender as being problematic. I mean, obviously every man can do better. But so can everyone, so to only portray men as being bad in the advert shows Gilette was singling out men. But also, I'm not a rapist, for example. And if one person comes up to me and says, "Hey man, don't rape people!" I'll be like, "Yeah, right on! People shouldn't rape people." But then it happens again, and you're like, "Yeah, I know. I definitely agree with you though!" Eventually, after constantl…
/r/MensRights15/02/19 12:30 AM
2

I mean, black males leave their children at a much higher rate than any other race. But if Gilette published an ad that said, "Hey, Black People, stop abandoning your children," do you think it'd be unreasonable for the majority of black people to be upset, regardless of whether they're actually leaving their families?
/r/MensRights14/02/19 11:19 PM
3

There absolutely is. Obviously not as large as that for women, but it does exist. Depending on how you present yourself, you'd be targeting different demographics. The majority of male prostitutes are generally going to be working with men, and the occasional female visitor. There are high end male escorts though that have majority female clients, generally involving going on dates/dinners, not always ending in sex.
/r/MensRights09/02/19 12:45 AM
2

This uses the same logic as pronouns. The person he was responding to said ".05%", so when he said ".5" in his response, it was pretty obvious he was also talking in percentages. It's like if Person 1 said, "Where did Jonathon go?" and Person 2 replies, "He went to the shops," but then Person 3 joins in and says, "Okay, but where did Jonathon go? I didn't ask about He." In the above example, Person 2 was clearly referring to Jonathon as he, as Person 2 was using a pronoun. Just because Person 2 …
/r/seduction15/12/18 09:57 PM
9

What? Your examples are about women working as computer programmers in wartime situations. The reason men weren't doing these jobs is because they had been drafted to fight on the front lines.
/r/MensRights14/11/18 10:12 PM
1

I don't know, guys. As fucked up as this is, I don't think she deserves more jail time then she got. No reasonable, sane person would go and murder their ex's new partner regardless of how much they were "goaded" to do it.
/r/MensRights18/10/18 02:26 AM
34

Wait, he got it the wrong way. If you have movable skin, then you aren't circumcised. If you don't have any movable skin that can be pulled over the head of your penis, then you are circumcised.
/r/MensRights13/07/18 12:06 AM
7

I've nothing to contribute, but just for future reference, it's "sought after"!
/r/MensRights21/04/18 04:27 AM
1

I think it's fair to say that some feminists want equality, and some want women to have advantages and control. While his statement was a pretty big generalisation, it's also true; some feminists are fighting for this. Your whole argument here is that anyone who wants to see the woman in the article let free isn't a "real feminist", which is a textbook example of the 'No True Scotsman' fallacy. Just because you don't agree with their point of view, that doesn't mean they aren't a "real feminist"…
/r/MensRights27/12/17 09:25 PM
9

It is to her, though. That dress looks good on you implies that she makes the dress look good. You look good in that dress implies that the dress is making her look good.
/r/seduction28/06/16 04:40 AM
7

FYI, I'm not the guy you originally replied to. That being said, you wrote in your comment: At 13 years-old, were you really able to consider all of the consequences about having a child? Your issue with statutory rape is that the underage party isn't capable to considering the consequences of having a child. The only thing different between vaginal intercourse and oral/anal intercourse is, for all intents and purposes, the ability to have a child. Therefore, it's not really surprising that your…
/r/MensRights06/05/16 07:55 AM
3

Not a strawman though, because you specifically mentioned having a child, which isn't a consequence of oral or anal sex.
/r/MensRights06/05/16 03:32 AM
9

51% would be classified as most, though.
/r/seduction13/04/16 04:31 AM
1

Not much to add, just wanted to say it's one of my favourite songs to sing.
/r/seduction16/03/16 10:52 PM
4

You're seeing confidence as, "If I express my feelings to somebody, I am confident that they'll react a certain way that is positive to me". The confidence that seddit talks about is not confidence in how another person will react, but confidence in yourself, i.e. "If I express my feelings to somebody, I'm not sure how they'll react, but I'm confident that I'll be okay if it's negative." Seddit's definition of confident, and your definition of courageous, boil down to be exactly the same thing -…
/r/seduction12/03/16 09:19 PM
0

You repeatedly typing "sudo-intellectual" was one of the most pseudo-intellectual things I've seen all day.
/r/MensRights12/03/16 04:12 AM
17

Am I missing the sarcasm or are you being serious?
/r/MensRights09/03/16 06:21 AM
3

Are you really suprised that you're being downvoted? Your comment was potentially one of the most sexist things I've ever heard. That's not equality, that's you being a prick.
/r/MensRights08/09/15 03:48 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter