~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Internet users in Britian will now be forced to "opt in" and register with their ISP to view pornography online. Feminist groups "delighted"."Well I can tell you today we are changing that. We are closing the loophole - making it a criminal offence to possess internet pornography that depicts rape." The move has been welcomed by women's groups and academics who had campaigned to have "rape porn" banned. Holly Dustin, director of the End Violence Against Women Coalition, said the group was "delighted". "The coalition government has pledged to prevent abuse of women and girls, so tackling a culture that glorifies abuse is critical for … | /r/MensRights | 22/07/13 09:17 PM |
| 1 | Why do feminist pro-choicers attack men who want paper abortions with the same vitriole thrown at them?If you abort a pregnancy, nobody has to spend ~18 years providing for a child. If you just opt out of fatherhood, there's still a child to raise. Of course, that's fine if there are alternative and sufficient forms of financial support for that child. I think the main issue is wanting to opt out of the responsibilities of parenthood, while taking offence at being expected to give up the rights that go along with them. It's like turning down a job, because you don't want to wear the uniform or wo… | /r/MensRights | 19/07/13 10:08 PM |
| 4 | Banned from /r/feminism: Close-minded, irrational, unavailable to dialogue.Yes, people have the right to do as they wish with their body, but not to the point where it interferes with another person's body. To have a person growing inside me, making me vomit, making movement uncomfortable, putting me at risk of death by eclampsia, is an interference with my body. -edit- Not trying to start a debate here, just pointing out why yours was an argument against women's bodily autonomy. | /r/MensRights | 16/07/13 10:54 PM |
| 0 | On the way home I asked a female pedestrian if I could buy a cigarette and she responded with, "I could call 911!"And it's impossible that she also needed to cross the road? I don't know about you, but when I'm walking home at night, or even in the middle of the day, I usually need to cross the road at least once. What this proves is that she also crossed the road, not that she followed them. And, considering that she said "I'm afraid because I feel like they could be right behind me," and considering that it was dark enough that he couldn't tell her gender, it seems possible that she didn't know where they… | /r/MensRights | 05/07/13 07:41 PM |
| 0 | On the way home I asked a female pedestrian if I could buy a cigarette and she responded with, "I could call 911!"It read to me like they got ahead of her, and she kept walking in the same direction she had been. Not sure there's enough there to assume she followed them anywhere. | /r/MensRights | 05/07/13 06:42 PM |
| 1 | On the way home I asked a female pedestrian if I could buy a cigarette and she responded with, "I could call 911!"I can understand being caught off guard. It must utterly suck to be faced with that reaction, especially if it's over a misunderstanding where you mean absolutely no harm. Try not to take it to heart. It's just an uncomfortable situation for everyone involved. It's cool that you can understand the other side in this case. | /r/MensRights | 05/07/13 05:48 PM |
| -5 | On the way home I asked a female pedestrian if I could buy a cigarette and she responded with, "I could call 911!"I've lived here for 8 years but when I first moved in I noticed that the women here seemed extremely closed off and unapproachable. After seeing some of the riff raff in the city saying harassing things to women I had an understanding of why, but I never thought that I would be assumed to be among those types of people. So you understand that she has reason to be unapproachable. It's dark enough that you couldn't tell whether she was even male or female. She probably couldn't tell either and the… | /r/MensRights | 05/07/13 04:26 PM |
| 0 | So, apparently the feminists over at r/againstmensrights believe that we're asking for a right to rape women.Not a problem - I did just leap into an MRA dominated conversation without much explanation. I just wanted to defend myself (and the other party) against that accusation. | /r/MensRights | 04/07/13 04:37 PM |
| 0 | So, apparently the feminists over at r/againstmensrights believe that we're asking for a right to rape women.Heh, Limbaugh-mination... I have to steal that. But no, I'm the feminazi referenced in the OP. One of that bunch who "saw fit to compare the Men's Right's movement to the Nazis." | /r/MensRights | 04/07/13 03:38 PM |
| 0 | So, apparently the feminists over at r/againstmensrights believe that we're asking for a right to rape women.SMH at the lack of thought. Do you not think the feminists who compared MRAs to (not called, like you do to them, but just compared to) Nazis wouldn't say the same thing? "No, they deserve to be called Nazis because XYZ." Actually, we didn't even compare them to nazis. We were talking about how people thinking they're the "good guys" shouldn't protect them from criticism if they're advocating or doing bad things. Nazis were brought up, since the person I was talking to came to the same realisati… | /r/MensRights | 04/07/13 01:30 PM |
| 1 | So, apparently the feminists over at r/againstmensrights believe that we're asking for a right to rape women.http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1guq82/according_to_this_about_98_of_human_sexual/ Hell, 98% of human interaction period. I'm definitely coerced into having to have a job. RAPE! Hah! Hilarious. Because needing to pay for things is exactly the same as enduring having sex against your will. If a drunk man and a drunk woman has sex, which one raped which? Haha! Both of them!? What nonsense! Actually a good question, but no, lets just mock it. Considering that I have masturbated for the … | /r/MensRights | 04/07/13 01:11 AM |
| -4 | So, apparently the feminists over at r/againstmensrights believe that we're asking for a right to rape women.Like I said, all incomplete links direct here. Wasn't sure of your policy, since direct links to /agm are banned. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1hhx1i/my_friend_and_rapist_gets_sentenced_today/ http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1h4uwo/why_we_should_care_that_ken_hoinsky_has_been/caquzfw http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1h4uwo/why_we_should_care_that_ken_hoinsky_has_been/ http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1h4teh/fusk_you_srs/ http://www.reddit.com/r/Me… | /r/MensRights | 04/07/13 12:42 AM |
| 0 | So, apparently the feminists over at r/againstmensrights believe that we're asking for a right to rape women.Incomplete links point to this sub. Promotions of rape or dismissals of consent linked to from only /againstmensrights within only the last 14 days. comments/1hhx1i/my_friend_and_rapist_gets_sentenced_today/ comments/1h4uwo/why_we_should_care_that_ken_hoinsky_has_been/caquzfw comments/1h4uwo/why_we_should_care_that_ken_hoinsky_has_been/ Not rape apologia, still violation apologia: comments/1h4teh/fusk_you_srs/ Thankfully you're at least divided when it comes to boys being raped: comments/1gyb6h/… | /r/MensRights | 03/07/13 11:40 PM |
| 3 | I'm pregnant and we just found out we're having a boy. My husband wants him circumcised, but I'm completely against that. How do I explain this to him?Explain to your husband that the risks are non-zero, and the benefits are near zero. There is a non-zero risk of your son essentially losing his penis or dying of an infection because of a cosmetic procedure that serves almost no purpose. My husband is completely against this and says that our son will be laughed at, will be terrible at sex, unwanted by women, bullied by guys, etc. So, three things. If your son wants or needs to be circumcised when he's older, it'll be in his power to have it do… | /r/MensRights | 30/06/13 05:43 PM |
| 1 | Someone's workplace gets it right. (x-post from r/pics.)Anyway, I am through wasting my time with someone who admitted they were only in this sub to troll. Thank you for that perfect example of MRAlogic. I say one thing meant to mock a "logic" worthy of mockery, and it is taken as an admission that I am here merely to troll. A false equivalence, since mockery and trolling are not the same thing, but also a distribution fallacy, since a single comment does not reflect the content of the entire collection of comments. Beautiful demonstration. Thank you… | /r/MensRights | 22/06/13 09:51 PM |
| 1 | Someone's workplace gets it right. (x-post from r/pics.)You're assuming that MRAlogic and logic are synonymous. | /r/MensRights | 22/06/13 09:36 PM |
| 1 | Someone's workplace gets it right. (x-post from r/pics.)You are assuming that nothing I say is intended merely to mock MRAlogic. | /r/MensRights | 22/06/13 09:21 PM |
| 1 | Someone's workplace gets it right. (x-post from r/pics.)You are assuming that you know what I assume. | /r/MensRights | 22/06/13 09:11 PM |
| 2 | Someone's workplace gets it right. (x-post from r/pics.)No where in my reply did I say any of the things your straw men did. Quite right, you didn't. I didn't claim you did. But it's not a strawman. It's called argumentum (or reductio) ad absurdium. That's where you take the underlying rationale and take it to extremes in order to point out why that particular rationale is nonsensical. See, here's the thing. We do take precautions. Obviously we do, since we live in a society which defends rapists and, however much you like to think that everyone know… | /r/MensRights | 22/06/13 03:10 PM |
| 1 | Someone's workplace gets it right. (x-post from r/pics.)You thought talking about placing flamethrower traps in your apartment in order to defend against burglaries was a serious statement? Honestly? | /r/MensRights | 22/06/13 02:24 PM |
| 1 | Someone's workplace gets it right. (x-post from r/pics.)Huh. I didn't know that. Thanks for the info. And in that case it's a perfect comparison to the "you shouldn't dress so slutty" argument. (Wearing non-revealing clothes makes little difference to whether someone will try to rape you.) | /r/MensRights | 22/06/13 02:11 PM |
| 0 | Someone's workplace gets it right. (x-post from r/pics.)There's no difference. If a guy gets shot for wearing the wrong colours, he's no more to blame than a woman is if she gets raped for not wearing a burqa and chastity belt, and carrying a flamethrower. Probably every colour is going to be gang colours somewhere, and you're not always going to know where the colours you're wearing will get you killed, so, call me crazy if this is extreme, it seems like the responsibility for the shooting would be on the people holding the guns and picking their ta… | /r/MensRights | 22/06/13 01:32 PM |
| -1 | Someone's workplace gets it right. (x-post from r/pics.)You had your doors and windows locked, but they still got in and stole your stuff? Pfft. Why didn't you have flamethrower traps!? Did you want to have your shit stolen or something? Take some fucking responsibility! Nothing you do will guarantee safety, and there's always one more thing you could have done to protect yourself. "He had a knife!" "SO!? You should've had a gun!" "He had a gun!" "SO!? You should've had a riot shield!" The only person who can absolutely guarantee that a crime doesn't… | /r/MensRights | 22/06/13 12:58 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter