TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

KaiserTom Archive

View 0 posts and 150 comments by KaiserTom on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

Par for the course. It's a golf metaphor.
/r/MensRights23/05/23 01:08 AM
20

It's just broad sex negativity towards men. It's male slut shaming. Men aren't allowed to like sex, it's oppressive and wrong. Women who think like this just reveal their insecurity that all they boil relationships down to is sex. That the only reason anyone could like them is their looks. That liking their looks means you like nothing else about them. It's super insecure and demonstrates their true lack of value, whether they have any in reality or not. There's a reason she thinks all guys are …
/r/MensRights12/04/23 02:29 PM
1

That's not sexism, except maybe the assumption they may make that the woman is weak. It's shitty and creepy to corner anyone like that, period. Someone who does that is not a good person. Maybe a sexist reason ultimately drives them to be a serial killer or rapist. You're right, many don't do it to not-women. But how much of that is just attraction? By that extension, is attraction in general sexism? Most only act towards one sex in a certain way. I'm still not sure what this has to do with my c…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/23 12:35 AM
11

And the majority of thise happen with people they know and have known for a while. This is the same problem with kidnapping statistics. Strangers rarely kidnap. The majority are family members. But if you take the statistics at face value, you get ridiculous fear of strangers on bad assumptions. When the people you should worry about the most are the people closest to you. The fear over male strangers raping is unwarranted to that regard because that's not what the statistics say. The percentage…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/23 11:42 PM
7

The only men who respond and stop initiating in those cases are all the respectful men women aren't finding. Leaving only the disrespectful ones to still initiate. And because women continue to respond positively to initiation despite all these complaints, and rarely initiate at all themselves, those guys are becoming a larger proportion of the dating pool women experience. There is no benefit to following your advice for anyone. It does not change or improve anyone's situation except those who …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/23 09:30 PM
23

Uh, no, a laughably small amount do. You are letting small percentages dictate your general actions over an entire half of people. Racists do the same thing and justify it with fear themselves. It's just straight discrimination. It's sexism.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/23 09:18 PM
8

Neurodivergence is accepted broadly but not by the individuals themselves. Trans people are accepted but not by individuals themselves. "It's okay to be those things, just not around me". Which is just tolerance and not acceptance of it. No one can force you to like it and you don't have to, but people still broadly dismiss others completely based on those unchosen properties.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/23 05:33 PM
2

I would love that answer too. Even my wife who pursued me still doesn't actually and fully accept it about me. She's getting better but it's still an ongoing argument about how I'm different. That I don't act in ways they expect, but don't communicate, because it's "common sense" to neurotypicals. Which at that point sometimes feels like I've tricked people into thinking I'm someone I'm not by outwardly appearing neurotypical. Because you can't maintain that mask forever and in private. It's not…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/23 05:19 PM
4

Therapy and counseling help you deal with it but it doesn't get people to actually accept and be considerate of the condition. Which you have no control over. Nor does it help with getting a partner. And no, "just date another autist" isn't an appropriate answer. Except the fact they've actually learned how to treat neurodivergents like humans, unlike others. So in a sense you're right in the worst way.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/23 02:04 PM
6

People seem to have a weird conflation that if someone does anything you feel is wrong that you think the government and police should be involved. Like no the guy, given the little information we do have, is a piece of shit but he didn't do anything to deserve jail time. You can shit on and hate people without thinking they deserve jail.
/r/MensRights23/03/23 02:26 PM
5

And that's a problem because it makes the sex transactional rather than the mutual fun it should be. Which just frames it bad for the women. Who feel used due to that framing themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/23 07:27 PM
2

You know you can recognize this fact and still take action and initiative right? None of that precludes the other. It certainly doesn't for me. Women don't take initiative for the most part. It's not an all women thing, and not even a same woman thing as the same women will certainly initiate with certain men. But presenting an opportunity to be initiated on is not initiation. Initiation requires not having the power of rejection. Not that you can't reject, but that's it's ultimately up to the o…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/23 07:28 PM
3

No, it really isn't. You walk around a store wondering why no one is hiring you. You didn't ask for an application, you just put yourself in a position to be asked if you want a job. That's not initiation. There's a huge difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/23 06:04 PM
5

No, they are presenting an opportunity to be initiated on, not actually initiating themself. Their actions have uncommunicated expectations and ambiguity to the one they're trying to woo. That's not initiation. This explains a lot if this is how women think though.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/23 06:03 AM
8

Just means a, generally committed, partner you "nest" with. That you share a home and bed with most days. Someone who is effectively a tiebreaker of who you'll default to, given an unresolvable conflict between your partners. This is the difference between an "open" and true "polyamorous" relationship. There's a inequality of treatment biased towards a specific partner. Poly demands true equality of partner treatment. I don't believe people are strictly polyamorous either, on average. I think bo…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/23 02:53 AM
12

I'm convinced nesting monogamy is "natural" for humans. But are non-monogamous otherwise. We want a stable mate but freedom of interaction.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/23 02:06 AM
10

Mass communication. You can interact with people miles away like nothing. There's a massive selection pool for everyone now. Not just restricted to relatively local people you come across or directly meet. Which opens up the door for the hot and promiscuous to satisfy tons of women since they can be found easier.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/23 09:51 PM
3

HCL is about the worst thing you can find in impure meth for your teeth. The fact is enamel is an extremely hardy substance. The hardest in your body. Because it has the specific job of being exposed to a ton of outside chemicals. It requires bacteria producing a rather strong acid directly on it for many days to cause it to decay. The chemicals will stain and affect them, absolutely no doubt. It's not healthy for you period. But those effects are overall mild and little different from smoking a…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/23 08:30 PM
11

Meth teeth is a thing because dry mouth and meth heads don't brush their teeth. At all for one, let alone enough to compensate for the dry mouth. It doesn't really impact the teeth substantially more than smoking anything else does by itself. You brush twice a day (or at least once before bed) you'll have great teeth on meth. The thing about a lot of dental effects by drugs is that the sample is naturally heavily biased to those with bad dentistry access and dental hygiene.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/23 06:50 PM
1

Its the just world fallacy in play. That somehow, in a two way relationship, it's all one side's fault in that. That there is no possible way it's not the other side unfairly judging them, or just plain unattracted to them all around. But you can't demand people be attracted to something they aren't. This is part of what the body positivity movement was supposed to help and fix too. Few people open a shoddy book cover, even if it's the best book in the world. People judge by covers. We can tell …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/23 05:34 PM
2

Women get looked at all the time. If a woman raises her head up and looks around, she's bound to make eye contact with someone looking at her. It's something I've asked and they've shared about how they find people in random public venues or events. I can tell you as a man, that is rarely ever returned unless, once again, you're the one staring at a prospect and they look around and see you. You just may have to spend the entire night doing it. And at that point you're only getting a confirmatio…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/23 05:24 PM
8

Condoms are not perfect. They do not have 100% success rate by a long shot. What happens when that fails? That's so far been the men's concerns for who I've talked to, me included.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/23 10:02 PM
1

Condoms are not 100% successful, by a long shot.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/23 10:01 PM
14

Yeah, there's no less, or more, vetting to be done. Shitty people are shitty people eveywhere and it's a bit racist more to assume they are just plain shittier by a larger degree elsewhere. As if they are better women for just being located where they are. Don't women complain when men tell them similar about vetting men better? That certain men at all scammer and golddiggers? Rather than generalizing them all?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/23 10:00 PM
2

70% of broken relationships could be avoided with couples counseling. Meaningful relationships need work and effort, they are not automatic.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/23 08:10 AM
2

I've honestly never liked Bond for the girls but just the spy aspect. The relationships are always incredibly shallow overall. It's uninteresting, as hot as some of them are. It'd be a different story if they kept an interest across multiple movies. But it wouldn't also be Bond I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/23 08:43 PM
7

It's usually not the concern. The emotional attachment is the focus and men self-insert their own type into the physical part.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/23 08:41 PM
14

Learning disabilities are not intellectual disabilities. Dyslexia is a learning disability. Many people are otherwise fine living with their learning disability and fully successful in their lives.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/23 01:35 AM
1

100%. Not all women are dumb to those men. They know they are more than attractive enough to do but with absolutely nothing else going for them. You get the vocal broken people though who try and fix said broken, attractive people and fail. And then proceed to complain about men/women because they only went for the attractive but broken ones.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/23 02:37 PM
3

Women's attraction still varies. One's 10% is not another's. Granted they absolutely overlap a lot, but it's far less than the immediate appearance of one cloned woman with a specific preference. I guarantee at least 30% of men are considered 10% by someone. Women in current society, on average, are more picky of attraction than men are but flexible on commitment. Men are picky on relationship committment generally and more flexible on attraction. If you ask this same attraction question along w…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/23 03:57 AM
6

This is a rather sexist comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/23 07:42 PM
2

You know, cashier's are people too. If you think you're misreading a flirt because of the job position, you can literally say that. "Are you flirting with me or is it just your job?". Being understanding of their position but also verifying your readings. Tact. If this is not a question you feel comfortable asking them, you're in severe crushing/feelings mode or not comfortable with them in the first place. Both an indication you should wait until you are.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/23 04:57 PM
0

It's not. And being in the eye of the beholder is the best part and allows a variety. But you still have to be interesting. You still have to be someone and self-actualize. To have love for yourself and what you do and want to be. You don't have to be a specific interesting, just be interesting.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/23 12:00 AM
9

Men tend to form their identities older it seems. Most don't become "interesting" until they are older. There is a lot of outward and broad materialist focus at the young ages. Lack of self-actualization and instead an external dependency for actualization. External forces should amplify your drive, not create it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/23 07:32 PM
6

People value stability of income more than the income itself sometimes. There's a lot of risk and uncertainty in new clientele. Also, a lot happens behind the scenes that others don't see. While materially he may be paying more, how much is "paid" in more emotional support? There is legitimately always the possibility she cares for him and he just needs to set boundaries. I could call a few spouses I know a "prostitute" by this posts definition but I also know it's more complex than that. Frankl…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/23 02:59 PM
12

Touch grass
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/23 12:56 AM
5

Red pill initially is just about being selfish in pursuit of loving yourself. That chivalry is dead, especially for men. Look out for yourself. Establish boundaries and don't simp for women. Respect and love yourself. And that confidence will get you someone. Pickup artists took it, or were always there, and made it sleezy, extremist, and all about just getting girls, which the incels then picked up on. Now it's the ridiculous extremist crap it is today that attacks and demeans women constantly.…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/23 07:47 PM
1

I'm just going to correct that that statistic includes a lot of high earners who put away significant money into mortgages and retirement. Also that study was self-reported asking if they "felt" like they were. To use people with significant positive net worth in that statistic I feel is disingenuous. I would like to know how many report that under $100k, $50k, negative, etc. Net worth. It's overall less I suspect, but I feel like those specific stats would also show an even worse reality for ac…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/23 07:31 PM
5

It's not "competence", it's "confidence". It's desire, not complacency. They are assertive in what they want. Potentially aggressive too, but it's the assertiveness that many people like. Many do not want someone that is overly complacent in their life. People want stability of the home, not a unchanging partner. It's not the competence at what they do, it's the pursuit and desire of a goal. And that they are their own seperate person with boundaries. People who tend to do this tend to earn more…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/23 07:24 PM
2

You can be both though. It usually requires taking a genuine interest in them as a person. And you can make that attraction known pretty early. Women usually leave that because it gets awkward, because there wasn't much of a connection in the first place. A grown woman is able to accept they are attractive to their genuine friends. This is usually how FWBs, and sometimes further, happen. Whoever is willing to not accept and leave that is not worth your time anyway. It's obvious it wasn't mutual …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/23 07:32 PM
1

You can be both. You can be genuinely interested in them as a person and friend while also letting your intentions known. "I am attracted to you, but I also enjoy being your friend a lot and you're a cool person". And that should be the truth. If it isn't, you choose the wrong person. Have more respect for yourself and choose someone you can actually like. Don't lose yourself in the relationship, it's easy to do. And then just don't be a creep about it. Flirt, interact, touch as appropriate if t…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/23 07:20 PM
3

It doesn't help you are nearly always against 50 other guys pushing your own message down. Being successful at dating apps is about consistency, because of luck, and establishing a connection to get rid of luck. You can't expect a woman to go through every message on a dating app until you've been talking a bit already. It's not just about engaging her either, it's about making yourself interesting to her. And the not sleazy way to do this is to just tell the truth and love yourself. Who are you…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/23 01:16 AM
11

No, they don't. When they do they are considered shallow, vain, and gross. That you should love them as a human first. Meanwhile there isn't as much counter culture on the women side for that until they get older. Women stay with bad men for their dick or paycheck and are overall supported for it unless things become violent or such. Like they can change them from being bad. Stop having "project partners" unless the project is to have them be a better them, not what you expect them to be.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/23 04:36 PM
0

Except that about 8.5 million of those don't require degrees and only need trade experience or certification. If they even need that. And still don't pay well. There's 2 million health care positions but again, most of those are low paying, certification positions. And the degree demanding ones don't actually pay well to the debt for a while. About 2 million fall under "Professional and Business services", which probably all do need degrees of unspecific variety.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/23 01:10 AM
3

Insecure people who can't communicate their needs to their partners and feel unloved think they're the "cheaper option". Are the gifts still thoughtful and useful? That's called efficiency.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/23 06:24 AM
4

Because what if them doing those things made them uncomfortable and continued to? So they stopped doing them. You can't force a person, especially your partner, to be uncomfortable if they don't want to be. That's their boundary. You don't have a right to make them uncomfortable when they don't want to be.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/23 06:20 AM
2

And even if you did care, you can just tell him you appreciate love poetry and if he could try to write some for you. Maybe they just have no idea you even value it so they never tried. Communication.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/23 06:11 AM
-1

Nope, but it stops me, and probably many guys, from opening the book past the cover to see what's inside. It screams "I don't love myself" and there's no need for me to take on that emotional baggage. Because it's a choice. Not being +30 lbs of garlic cheese bread, I'm talking 100+ lbs. I frankly have a preference that leans more that thicker direction myself. Men honestly don't have an unreasonable expectation of it. Even then the popularity of BBW implies a section of men that don't care about…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/23 10:29 PM
5

I think they are conflating open relationships and dating with harem and property. Consensual harems I guess, which really still doesn't fit the definition of what's going on. Choosing to be intimate with men who are openly intimate with a committed, or another, partner isn't a harem and being treated like property. And that's making an assumption a man and woman can't be good friends first and with benefits of sex second. Frankly people tend to become ironically more platonic having had that ph…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/23 04:34 PM
2

The difference in happiness is 50% men vs 60% women being single. When people say single women are happier, they are clamoring over a 20% relative difference in average happiness between groups. Both groups have problems. If men aren't committing to you, it's likely because of you. You either aren't an interesting person or genuinely interested in them. That you aren't your own self of a person and lose yourself in a relationship, or you treat them without true respect and like a pet or roommate…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/23 04:29 PM
1

That's because of, again, projection. The most stoic people I know are women. They have emotion, but their worldview is incredibly stoic. They attack men's blatant stoicism as an insecurity to their own stoicism they feel bad about having. It's frankly seemingly a sort of jealousy of "Men get to be stoic and we can't". Fear of being ostracized for it or whatever.
/r/MensRights12/02/23 08:08 PM
1

Respect and don't box people. Assume they can be better and see it form their perspective. Stop punishing children for the faults of their ancestors, especially when you haven't even experienced it yourself.
/r/MensRights12/02/23 12:59 AM
15

The women who say men only care about sex tend to have little else than that to give back themselves. It's a projection because they are insecure with their own high sexuality. And when people dump them for either being completely bricks of a person who don't and refuse to love themselves, they blame it on the other instead. Both this "women are too emotional" and "men are too sexual" is actually just projections. Women are sexual but insecure in it. Men are emotional but insecure in it. No one …
/r/MensRights12/02/23 12:57 AM
2

This is literally being afraid to tell the truth. They do not tell the truth because of a fear of not looking polite. A fear of judgement by the people around them. They have a distrust or cause a distrust towards the people they are speaking to. An assumption and stereotype of a response. And all it does is cause problems when the truth is revealed to people in spite of the lies. It just hurts people. Lies hurt, even when being polite. They just hurt later. Because you didn't trust them to take…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/23 12:01 AM
7

TRP started mild. Frankly I think many of the views people call "red pill" are pretty black pilled. It was originally a recognition that this common "be nice" advice is completely false, perpetuated by women with no skin in the game. That being nice has never been the hold up to a relationship and TRP is a recognition of that. Not that you shouldn't be nice, but that it's not what actually gets you a relationship with someone. It's usually necessary to keep them, but it doesn't get them past the…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/23 04:03 PM
3

No and would gladly do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/23 02:36 PM
2

Never heard a woman say "Yeah he's emotionally abusive but he's hot so long term I don't see that being a problem at all. He'd be a great dad!" No, but that doesn't stop it from happening. Women let crazy fuck them and men fuck crazy. I've never heard a man say that either but yet it still happens despite the warnings. And it's a bad idea both times but the attraction blinds them and they refuse to see the abuse or think they can "fix" it. Which causes a lack of boundaries to be placed in the en…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/23 08:28 AM
2

The gay assumption is only a problem if you let it fester. You treat them like a person and express the, assumedly, genuine attraction you have to them. And you really don't know that. Anecdotally, some women swoon over those kinds of baristas all the time from a distance. No they don't go out of their way for it though, but that's the typical feminine role in the first place. Nothing ever usually happens as a result because of the barista. Because the man never expresses an attraction back, and…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/23 05:58 PM
0

Honestly, I think they kinda would still throw themselves at him. He's very cute, period. At the very least women let their immediate guard down because of it, but that just leaves them vulnerable to him expressing an attraction back. And yes that does work when it isn't your entire identity and there's more to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/23 05:29 PM
7

You are taking something that happened to women at the high classes, the rich and powerful people who have always been shitty throughout history, and applying it as if the entirety of humanity did that. Illiterate people didn't record the history you are reading. The 99% of peasant farmers trying to live their life didn't practice these things or have any direct influence on it. They just tried to live life and managing a home/farm was a full time job by itself. They had one wife and married. Th…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/23 05:22 PM
18

Dressing gay isn't going against any of these stereotypes. In fact I would say he fits all of them pretty well if you generalize them more. Highly successful, confident, attractive, outgoing. What you wear matters less than how you wear it.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/23 05:14 PM
11

JusticeServed and any and all subreddits a TwoX power mod manages
/r/MensRights09/02/23 04:45 PM
17

I hope you at least consider the hot sugar mommas. Not that there are many.
/r/MensRights07/02/23 11:58 PM
1

You know you can apply a lot of the good manners and courtesies of chivalry to all people, not just to women? Also there's a difference in being a servant to a partner and being subservient. You still have to have a confidence beyond that. Women generally don't like when serving your partner is your only personality trait. Being a confident person who is choosing to serve the other is very different than a desperate person who feels they need to serve the other.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/23 03:04 PM
6

An actual dadbod, which has variations. Not all dadbods can't see their junk. But even some are good with that yes. And no, not Jason Mommoa, being actually attracted to real average dadbod people.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/23 07:52 PM
8

Some girls really love the whole "Climbing a giant" thing. Don't know if that's you, but yeah there's plenty to sexualize and be aroused from there. Many men really do love large and big women. Sexuality and arousal is uncontrollable in what you find that way. And that's completely stapled into your mind at 10/puberty. You know, ignoring the whole top priority of them being a good partner thing of course. That's another thing is what even said they weren't good partners at the time? Just based p…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/23 06:04 PM
20

Anecdote but I do know girls who legitimately get aroused from dadbods. They do exist. Granted some I don't think have actually tried it, so who knows if that will change. But fantasy is different from reality for anyone and you won't truly know until you do do it. Also, it's becoming clearer that these gender stereotypes may be more projections from the other gender. Actual studies are showing women as the far more varied sexual and physically intimate beings with the man actually being the one…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/23 05:38 PM
10

So because you both have a vagina, you got offended for them? Or took offense because this describes you?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/23 02:24 AM
1

I seem to remember constant bashing on men over over-sexualization, objectification, and unrealistic beauty standards. So that's not even true. Maybe it's not discussed here anymore because it's been played out already a million times far beyond reddit?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/23 12:01 AM
1

So I think they took just your title/quote directly and misunderstood your post. Am I correct in that you are actually criticizing people who claim Leo is a poster child of this "ideal relationship"? With examples of additional celebrities who did the opposite. I think they took it as you agreeing/defending it. Their counter was that more men may want open relationships instead of that, which still ultimately commit to a single partner but allow sexual or emotional intimacy outside of it, potent…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/23 11:58 PM
2

How do you know that? You know some relationships have one of the partners as the major public head of it. But privately they will still communicate plenty and understand each other's wants and needs? Maybe she has listened to him complain endlessly about these things and is pushing and helping with that for him? She may even frankly have expected this reaction and was willing to be the bad girl in this. You seem to have a lot of accurate knowledge on their intimate private lives to assume, desp…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/23 11:45 PM
0

Yeah, in the underdeveloped parts of the world. Not the UK. If you live in those places then I'm sorry for you and do not envy it. This is not one of those places though.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/23 11:41 PM
5

That's why it's being talked about so much. You have the racists and the sexists all on the story. If it ain't one, it's the other or both. Doesn't matter how okay he is with everything about it, it's a demonstration of "traditional ideals" being uplifted. Tradition matters more than consent apparently.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/23 11:38 PM
3

No, it's basic gatekeeping because they can't read rule #1 that says leave women alone. It's not a fallacy to say you aren't a gamer if you play literally no games. The fallacy is the assumption, not the proof by semantic definition.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/23 05:10 PM
3

That kinda defeats the entire premise of MGTOW and it's why them and incels don't get along. They share similar complaints to a point but they refuse to actually, you know, go their own way and it's shitty and toxic to the communities who specifically are trying to get away from all that drama. But silence is violence nowadays right? Not saying anything is as bad as saying the wrong thing or what people don't want to hear. Not to mention silent groups naturally don't defend themselves very loudl…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/23 05:08 PM
3

Haven't similar arguments been used from the other side about the over sexualization and objectification of women causing unrealistic beauty standards in men? Could this not be construed in a way that has the man "sacrificing his standards" for his woman because he learned an unrealistic standard? Some would think that's perfectly okay. After all, things like porn can cause demonstrable problems in that in some people. If it applies from men to women, why can't it apply from women to men? Just b…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/23 09:31 AM
5

You don't have to be delusional to real life to feel good and happy.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/23 09:27 AM
6

Because finding cause and effect in society is absurdly difficult. And no one has the money in these fields to actually make them comprehensive. These correlative studies pave the way for more funding to actually find more of a cause and effect. Also just the fact that society is a completely dynamic system and massive. Every strategy within it has an equal and opposite counter strategy. And many in-between.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/23 08:59 PM
1

Coercion implies actual power over another and being used to harm that person if they refuse. The definition includes force and threats. This includes threats of violence. It includes anything that a person can use to inflict some harm on the other if they don't agree. Such as being in a position of power over them. Destroying their social status if they don't agree. You're not using that word correctly. You are correct that animals "sexual coerce", aka rape, others regularly. Nature doesn't car…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/22 09:02 PM
6

There's a difference between leverage and coercion and the two aren't mutually exclusive. Being rich is leverage but not coercion. Being your manager is leverage and coercion. The latter is the bad one. You say no to the rich guy, you never see each other again. It's leverage but not coercion. You say no to the manager, and your performance is heavily scrutinized and you're mysteriously fired for it. Coercion since it deals with your livelihood. Leverage is not bad. Coercion is.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/22 04:17 AM
13

Why do we assume that those women have absolutely zero free will in these scenarios? As if women can't legitimately want these things from the other direction. Yeah the guy is leveraging what he has, but the woman being wooed still has to say yes. They usually aren't being actually raped. They are adult humans who can make adult decisions. And can want sex just as much as any man can. Or even want to take advantage of what the man is offering in exchange for sex. Which can still be mutually good…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/22 04:11 AM
1

Also a woman is more likely to be attracted to one of two males than just one. More appealing to a broader audience.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/22 01:41 AM
1

Well, they also have two choices to be attracted to. If you aren't attracted to the one partner, you could be attracted to the other. Broadening your audience.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/22 01:40 AM
0

No, they haven't. Not unless they are paying 10x for a high-end escort. And even then the concern is the risk of getting screwed at that high cost, whether it's a valid or common risk or not. No, men have money, they just want their money's worth and the risks unregulated and illegal prostitution comes with makes that value proposition wonky. Money has rarely stopped a man from prostitution if they actually want the sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/22 09:39 PM
1

They don't. They feel more scared about the insecurity of the sex. Of the major risks involved with an unregulated industry like that. They may be prideful on the outside, but the only thing that has ever actually stopped them has been the risk of STDs and children. Cost or paying for it has never been a real problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/22 06:30 PM
2

No, it's a matter primarily of security against STDs and children. No one has ever had an issue with the cost, they had an issue with the major risks it comes with which makes the cost not worth it. Which are frankly really expensive so I guess yeah, it is about cost, but in a much different way.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/22 06:28 PM
0

A sense of entitlement wouldn’t let them. They demand to get it for free. I just want to comment on this specifically. When I was younger, my concern completely with prostitution was STDs and birth control. I could have easily afforded it, and probably would have, if I was guaranteed to be safe from those things. But it's illegality makes it very sketchy. Unless you spend ridiculous amounts of money, which you may still get scammed for. Men lament that relationships are cheaper than prostitution…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/22 06:26 PM
3

The recognition is the new phenomena but it has been negatively impacting humans since it's inception. It's always been an existing phenomenon. Diseases have always been a human problem, it's just in the recent centuries we've recognized and fixed many. People accepted it as life and struggled with it, but it was always a problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/22 05:01 PM
11

So you are going to blame the children for the faults of their ancestors? That it's okay to demean men for things they had absolutely zero control over because they weren't alive then? Absolutely ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/22 05:24 PM
3

Yep, exactly. Fair and Just Worlds exist purely in human fiction. Purely human concepts. That doesn't mean we can't continually strive to achieve a more fair and just world, but people have to realize we are playing against such a cosmically apathetic universe. That has zero concept of these things. The universe doesn't care a murderer killed someone. It does not care a good person altruistically helps someone all their life. There is no karma for them. Bad people go on doing bad things if there…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 11:25 PM
2

You are assuming malice where there is none. That's an extremely toxic assumption when the reality is that most people are ignorant morons who don't know any better because they don't have the experience to know better. People are humans. They are fickle and irrational all around with incomplete information about both themselves and others. No human will ever fully know those things. They can only experience and learn from it. Malice should be prepped for and confirmed, never assumed. In all soc…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/22 08:27 PM
3

Shit U right. I should go down to my local men's club, where we all agree we want a certain portion of us to be shitty people and abusers to women, and just tell them not to be. Where we are able to control the mind and actions of all men because we are one collective. Genius idea.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/22 09:11 AM
11

I've got nothing else to comment except as far as sexually is concerned. I'm convinced a lot of women have the equivalent of "iron grip" syndrome. Not all of them of course, and there's certainly some biological disadvantages to women's sexual satisfaction. But there's got to be a similar effect women get like men get with being unable to satisfy themselves with typical sex because they've gotten so used to very intesive, and very perfected, stimulation from masturbation. Though many women frank…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/22 03:02 AM
8

You don't want partners/lovers with mutual issues. You want mutual understanding and acceptance of issues for both. You want awareness and to work on it or supplement it. Mutual issues can just lead to increasingly ignoring the issue until something bad occurs from it. Mutual issues should be between friends. You share and advise on it, but otherwise you'll both commonly ignore and focus on other mutual interests.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 10:04 PM
9

Do you think being a poor woman in any of those places is comparitively better? Being poor sucks everywhere, but it sucks a whole lot harder in those places than in the western world. Any person born with citizenship in a western country has won the birth lottery. For all the problems the countries continue to have, the objective reality is it's still significantly better for all involved. Which should really be making you more appalled at the real and terrible conditions people still face in th…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 08:33 PM
8

There's a disconnect in what the genders tend to want. Women don't mind lots of "shallow" friends. They can keep up and engage with many different people and their interests. Deeper relationships are a goal but far less focused on. Men however want a singular, or few, deeper relationships with their friends. They want a lot shared with very few people. Not that they don't value the "shallower" relationships either, but time focus is just simply going to be different. While I'm sure there's a lot…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/22 05:40 PM
7

20 years of trying says you are doing it wrong. Not that you were wrong for throwing the trash away, but that somehow you keep finding this trash. If a person digs around in a landfill for 20 years and complains about only finding trash, I'm not sure what to tell them. If a man sat here and said they dated women for 20 years and all they wanted was their money, there would be a ton of people shitting on them for them being the one common factor in that.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/22 02:34 AM
1

No one said anything about what those people actually are, just how they perceive themselves to be. Which is very often dichotomous to things they feel insecure about and things they don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/22 02:30 AM
2

Narcissist. Meaning their partner wanted things for themselves. And wanting anything except to make your partner happy and fulfill their every desire is narcissism. Obviously.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/22 12:05 AM
0

Uh, no. While yes, there is likely a lower percentage of women who do, due to more sanitary reasons like you said, there's plenty of stories of women not realizing not to wipe towards their vagina. Let alone those who don't reach farther back than their vagina, leaving the ass untouched. Humans can be very ignorant. Not gender specific. Hell, women's bathrooms are some of the grossest things in the world. I mean, that's a baseline for all life, no life has the concept of "gross". They only react…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/22 03:23 AM
4

Ha, what an extremely shallow way to evaluate "effort" in dating.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/22 12:44 AM
2

Neither do some women. Both sides can play this game. It's just shitting on a gender because of common human problems that affect both.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/22 12:40 AM
6

You mean high value men don't want more chances of STDs or unwanted pregnancies, even with ideal contraceptive use?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/22 10:16 PM
7

Except those states where you become legally married after living enough years together anyways.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/22 02:32 AM
7

Women give terrible dating advice.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 05:04 PM
2

Yep. Women and men alike. People are too submissive and let guards down too quickly.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/22 11:41 PM
11

Yep. Dating as a man kinda sucks.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/22 11:00 PM
5

And once again, these things are living rent-free in your head and negatively impacting your outlook.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/22 11:19 PM
3

Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/22 10:25 PM
2

Women want to feel better about the problem, men want to solve the problem And that's mostly a socio-cultural problem too. Just a change in thinking to one of problem solving than problem alleviating. Of which both are important, but problems never get solved just feeling better about them and some problems just aren't easy to solve and need alleviation while they happen or it overwhelms and stresses you, which only slows down solving it. Nothing says either role needs to be fulfilled by a speci…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/22 10:27 PM
8

That should be obvious for any and all groups. They aren't more or less sexist, just sexist because they are human. People need to learn that just because you can hear someone from a group, doesn't mean they represent the group.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/22 01:57 AM
9

You aren't wrong, but it's a very difficult thing to convince of people who have never had a significant relationship before. It comes off from a position of privilege, a la when rich people say "Money doesn't matter". Relationships don't buy happiness but they can certainly make achieving happiness easier. Having had sex (lol) I can honestly say it's frankly a bit overrated. Still great, but there's a lofty fantasy that builds among any virgin about it. It's far more about the person than the a…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 02:05 AM
7

Ok then yes, he was being entitled if he did actually get pissed. That's not okay, but that's just assholes. I don't have an answer for how you easily distinguish those people from those who are genuine before they reveal themselves. The world would be a much different place if someone did have that answer. But yes, even legitimately nice guys will usually still want to get in your pants. Not because it's the only thing you offer, but that they want that physical connection with a person they ge…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/22 07:26 AM
4

No they don't. All men don't know all other men. And you only know so much as your friends tell you, which can often not be that detailed. Its weird to talk about dating specifics for people. I can sit here and decry terrible things I've seen women do and then blame you for not solving it; for not calling out your friends for it. Despite you having no idea it's happening or even being related to those people. It's just not fair to you and it's not fair for you to turn around and do the same thin…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/22 08:30 PM
1

Good question. Maybe someone would actually make a better dating app in that case that doesn't encourage this kind of crap if people actually left it. But so long as people keep using it and paying for it, there is no incentive for any dating company to improve their service or system. Stop using it and the problem gets solved. You'll have to go without and/or research better options. You can't have your cake and eat it too.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/22 08:21 PM
2

You should know this sub gets targeted by the harassment extension Masstagger. The extension developer claims it's a hate sub so now it's a hate sub to anyone with the extension.
/r/MensRights21/09/20 02:34 AM
1

Maybe I've just become used to it, but what is there to really "appreciate" in this image, minus their jobs? There is literally nothing "wrong" with eating a lunch like this. Sitting outside, on rather clean ground no less, is not a demeaning place to eat lunch by any means.
/r/MensRights09/09/20 05:19 PM
4

I've have at least 1000 hours in Warthunder planes so I'm sure I'm well prepared.
/r/MensRights16/08/20 11:59 PM
11

Burden of proof lies on you/OP to prove a claim. All you are doing is positing anecdotes off as facts.
/r/MensRights25/12/19 01:14 AM
3

Women not knowing what they want is supposed to be just a joke, but jesus you read things like this and you wonder the bit of truth in the statement.
/r/MensRights19/12/19 05:22 PM
12

A sexual relationship is not the end-all, be-all of human life. It's certainly not something everyone values equally by any means. Even from a purely evolutionary standpoint humans have two genomes; one composed of genes and the other of memes (ideas). You can choose to omit the former to focus on the latter to pass down your ideas to the next generation. Not to mention that sort of mindset can lend way too much power to the other side of the relationship. That it is a "privilege" to be in a rel…
/r/MensRights17/10/19 11:31 PM
1

It's an American media thing. If you normalize what each country defines as a "mass shooting", you'll find we aren't really that high up.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/19 05:57 PM
17

Bullying hasn't gone away, it's just simply evolved.
/r/MensRights03/10/19 07:38 PM
5

becky becky please lemme smash
/r/MensRights16/09/19 07:32 PM
7

It's completely legal in any location where a person doesn't have "an expectation of privacy" such as a public space for example a park, a mall, or even a restaurant. Can't record them in more private settings such as hotel rooms or houses though without consent.
/r/MensRights29/08/19 02:47 PM
3

Brands are an investment; a bank account. You put in by providing products of consistent quality. Not necessarily good, just consistent. It builds momentum of people buying the product and having trust in it. You take out that money by taking advantage of that trust and raising prices vs competitors or reducing quality. But that money isn't endless; it does run out. People get more and more dissatisfied and untrustful of the brand and the momentum disappears until it's no more. The momentum does…
/r/MensRights24/08/19 10:00 PM
4

It really isn't anymore. It's a meme that gets spread around from days it was truer, but nowadays if you do any marginal thing that could be considered "work", then you'll likely be getting paid for it, or have a very easy case on your hands which plenty of lawyers would work free on.
/r/MensRights08/08/19 06:38 PM
13

That's not true at all. Sexuality is absolutely partially genetic and partially a result of the culmination of experiences you have before you hit puberty. Studies and observations have shown time and time again that sexuality, once you hit adulthood, is pretty immutable. Maybe, with severe effort put in over a lifetime combined with desperation, can someone change their sexuality, but that is hardly "fluid". Yes, a gay man can have sex with his wife but he will still be 100% gay. Sexual despera…
/r/MensRights15/05/19 03:38 AM
3

One bad apple ruins the bunch. It's the duty of the good apples to either separate themselves from the bad ones or risk being lumped in with them. This has happened to many movements where people start calling themselves a different label to separate themselves from the insane ones in their previous group. Sure not all cops are bad, but many of them are, and I'm not about to take the risk of dealing with them when I don't have to, on the chance I get one of those bad ones.
/r/MensRights18/01/19 07:09 PM
19

Unfortunately parasites can get too greedy if don't think even a step ahead and end up killing off the producers, killing themselves in the process (brain drain).
/r/MensRights30/11/18 11:35 PM
39

It's redundant as those fit into rules 1&2. Being rich is attractive, being poor is unattractive.
/r/MensRights18/11/18 05:29 PM
26

Now that's just comparing apples to oranges.
/r/MensRights15/11/17 04:58 PM
8

You are implying being intoxicated directly affects mens rea, which is doesn't. Intoxication may affect mens rea indirectly by changing a person's thought process but so can literally anything. If you go into a car intending to kill someone, it is second degree murder regardless of whether you are intoxicated or not. It doesn't get downgraded to involuntary manslaughter simply because you were intoxicated. You implyed that it did in the post I replied to.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 06:49 PM
24

Yeah it literally does. It's the reason that drunk drivers who kill people are charged with involuntary manslaughter instead of second degree murder. Mens rea is an important component for things like murder and assault. This is blatantly wrong. Vehicular manslaughter exists for many reasons beyond just drunk driving. And you can definitely be charged with second degree murder even if you are drunk driving. It all depends on Mens rea, just like you said. If someone kills another in anger or pass…
/r/MensRights13/10/17 04:08 PM
2

https://simonwilliamson.files.wordpress.com/2014/02/morgan-freeman-racism.jpg Really applies well to most things
/r/MensRights06/12/16 10:15 PM
6

Calling a suit a torture device means you probably have an improperly fitted or very poor quality suit (and your ties shouldn't be choking you). A good suit should feel very nice to wear, akin to pajamas even. It can also be rather empowering too if you have a stylish one. But nonetheless I agree, the lack of choice of clothing for men in the workplace or formal occasions is atrocious.
/r/MensRights22/08/16 02:08 AM
5

What I don't understand is how someone can work in a field for 7 years and not know at least 95% of what someone who's worked in the field for 18 years does. You would think at a certain point there's not too much more to learn, that the difference between the two is marginal at best (not to try to undermine you or anything). She would have had to have been extremely oblivious to everything that went on around her (or not at work in the first place) those 7 years to be that ignorant. It baffles …
/r/MensRights28/06/16 09:21 AM
11

I was pleasantly suprsised by Amazons discrimination video when they portrayed both old AND young people being discriminated against ("you're too old, you wouldn't understand technology nowadays" and "we would like someone with a bit more... experience for this position")
/r/MensRights22/05/16 05:54 AM
1

I don't know your situation, so I don't know if I can be any help to you, but as a sufferer of a certain social development disorder, I feel almost obliged to give my 2 cents. It's a process, made much easier or harder depending on your starting position. The easiest step though is to continue being who you are, but in a more social format. Things like conventions are amazing places to break out of that eggshell, being surrounded by people who are much more likely to understand you or are at lea…
/r/MensRights04/10/15 10:49 AM
1

Man this is some bullshit, why ain't I important enough.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 04:24 AM
3

Jokes on you, I already have a personal multireddit for it (because subbing would be conformist).
/r/MensRights10/02/15 08:50 PM
1

Well now it's staying that way in spirit of the sub
/r/MensRights10/02/15 08:23 PM
13

/r/mildlinfuriating
/r/MensRights10/02/15 08:00 PM
5

But only if she's not drunk, otherwise it impaired her judgment signing it and is rape anyways.
/r/MensRights13/12/14 02:49 AM
2

I know you are joking and all, but I'm just clarifying on the development of humans. We simply gain the ability to think of other people as having other view points, this does not mean we have to use it from then on, it's just saying it is next to impossible for any small child to have this "theory of mind" before that age, which studies have shown to be overwhelmingly true. This is the same with other developmental stages, it's not saying that we use it from then on, just that we never had the …
/r/MensRights21/11/14 09:14 PM
12

And then the oven and refrigerator, which all managed to reduce what was once an all day job of being a housewife to that of a couple of hours. No longer did you have to go out and buy groceries from the farmers market everyday, no longer did you have to chop wood and keep the stove at a proper temperature, or have to beat the crap out of the rugs for hours, or wash dishes by hand which also takes a large amount time. Suddenly women had all this time and little to do, they started to expand thei…
/r/MensRights01/09/14 03:19 AM
-3

A tip that helped me personally was to take vitamins and omega 3 every day, so that I wouldn't have to be worried about vitamin deficiencies while I was not eating. I helped to convince me that my body was just uselessly bitching at me every time it claimed it was hungry and allowed me to power through it. Managed to lose 30 pounds in 6 months with really only a little bit of cardio by having a gronola bar in the morning, apple for lunch, and it pretty much allowed you to eat quite a bit of dinn…
/r/MensRights31/05/14 09:40 PM
3

A private business can get you towed at any time to another space in their parking lot/property usually because anything more wouldn't hold up in court. My business does this with any vehicle (even customer) if it happens to get in the way of a shipment/our work.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 07:19 AM
2

This is my problem with obamacare, instead of going full socialist or free market, it went corpratist which is probably the worst choice they could have made. They allowed for insurance companies to make more profit off of their plans because as with birth control, not everyone uses it, so they are charging people for it without themselves paying for it. And they still disallow healthcare insurance competition over state lines so no more competition will actually occur, as well as the fact emplo…
/r/MensRights12/11/13 04:34 AM
28

Its sad you need to add the /s to the end of that.
/r/MensRights24/10/13 09:51 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter