TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

KalegNar Archive

View 3 posts and 192 comments by KalegNar on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

But it's good for those that haven't heard it before.
/r/MensRights28/02/22 12:05 AM
1

Heading to bed so I haven't watched the video. But January 1st is the Solemnity of Mary, Mother of God. Considering she's the most important woman in the Catholic faith, it's not far-fetched that he might focus more on women in his homily.
/r/MensRights02/01/22 08:40 AM
1

Also, January 1st is the Solemnity of Mary, Mother of God. It's not surprising if he might be more focused on women than men in remarks on that day. (And also assuming Breitbart is giving proper context of the quote.)
/r/MensRights02/01/22 08:23 AM
1

I'm just gonna chime in with others that the Church being referred to in the maternal way is nothing new at all. There's a longstanding tradition of the Church being the Bride of Christ and other such imagery. So you're really cherry-picking at something without seeing the full context. Also, January 1st is the Solemnity of Mary Mother of God in the Roman Rite. (I'm not sure in terms of the Eastern Rites.) So is it really a surprise the Pope might choose a more woman-focused quote, assuming Brei…
/r/MensRights02/01/22 08:19 AM
1

Witch trials were predominantly Protestant. While there were a few people convicted of witchcraft by the Inquisition, those were in cases of repeat offense. In fact, there were cases of the Inquisition taking to task false accusers. And in most of the guilty cases it was basically "Yeah you messed up. But it's an understandable mistake. So go to confession and we're good."
/r/MensRights02/01/22 08:12 AM
2

A wise man said nothing and restored the chain.
/r/MensRights20/08/21 01:44 PM
1

I thought that from what I've read in general, the Taliban is actually against bacha bazi. (Albeit because they see it as gay, so not a concern with the age.) Not saying there won't be corrupt members of the Taliban doing that, but I thought that the Taliban did put some effort against that practice.
/r/MensRights20/08/21 01:17 PM
9

When I hear "Masculinity should be about queer rights, racial equality, etc." what I hear is, You don't matter. Only what can do for what I, the woke SJW lecturer, deem necessary for society matters. If you're not aiding me with your life, you are not worth my consideration. My masculinity applies to my life. And the focus of my masculinity is me. Its purpose is to get me through life. And this queer+ stuff is not applicable to 99.99% of my daily life. So to say masculinity should revolve around…
/r/MensRights15/08/21 01:10 PM
0

Also a couple means two and you asked three questions, I demand a refund. Fill out a form 32.8 C along with a form 89 D and submit it with your RFKN Application Form between the hours of 8 Central and 10:01 Pacific to my office.
/r/MensRights14/08/21 01:39 AM
0

What the fuck that sub is sexist, some teacher had a porn tab open and everyone is calling it grooming and misogyny, like what, it isn’t the man just had the tab bookmarked. I swear if a female teacher did that they would all be fine with it. A couple questions. What age was the teacher teaching? College? High school? Middle school? Elementary? Was it a classroom setting or an impromptu one on one? Wasthe teacher using a personal computer or a institution one? For anything below college, I think…
/r/MensRights13/08/21 10:39 PM
13

From what I gather FDS is about: Finding partners who aren't losers Getting dates that aren't misogynist Complaining about misogyny in society If you read the FDS handbook a little, you'll find that FDS is about exploiting men. One of the tips that struck me was along the lines of "Don't care about what he wants from the relationship. The only things that matters is you getting what you want. Him getting anything should only be a byproduct of getting what you want." That is NOT a healthy mentali…
/r/MensRights13/08/21 10:23 PM
7

I dont think sidelining 1/2 the species in media to glorify the other is healthy for either gender. "When one sex wins, both sexes lose." -Warren Farrel
/r/MensRights13/08/21 02:31 PM
7

It's annoying when you see constant shitting on White people. Was finally watching season 2 of Snowpiercer the other day. Each episode begins with a short monologue by a character. And with just one word, Mr. Wilford's E3 (or E2) villain monologue was ruined IMO. Because he was going a bit into his motivations and instead of ending with "What is an old man to do?" it ended with "What is an old White man to do?" Race had never been important in the show. There were characters of various races, bu…
/r/MensRights13/08/21 02:09 PM
0

I'd probably want more context on the sub and pic. Since I can kind of see how things could get misinterpreted depending on the situation. And, anecdotally, I've not run into issues of calling a kid cute on reddit. I've done so in a couple subreddits like r/childrenfallingover or in a couple show-based subs where the child actor's character exhibits cute traits.
/r/MensRights10/08/21 09:54 PM
1

A future where 90% of rape allegation were true is a better one than today's world. Because the closer we get to a rate of 100% true, the better we are at not having to deal with false accusations in the first place.
/r/MensRights10/08/21 09:05 PM
4

Tap on it. It's a link to the article.
/r/MensRights05/08/21 05:56 PM
6

What is a man? A la Aristotle, a featherless biped.
/r/MensRights02/08/21 11:16 PM
1

First things first: congratulations! As for the rest, I can't really help you there yet too much. (Not being a father myself and still figuring out life.) Thinking through my own childhood I know my parents did a good job on their part, but it's hard to think if the specific things in a sense as they just feel normal to me.
/r/MensRights02/08/21 08:30 PM
5

Acknowledging what the exact gender equivalent is demonstrates with clarity how normalized and extreme these double standard are. I can agree with pointing out a double-standard. And perhaps, over a text-based medium, I misinterpreted your intent. I guess my preferred method would be more along "Huh? Maybe you meant loose pussy energy? Or do you realize that would be sexist?" But I can see that kind of intent given your followup comment.
/r/MensRights02/08/21 03:11 PM
5

Hittorito made a bad comment. And going "small dick energy" is wrong. But that doesn't give us a pass to go "loose pussy energy" as that is also wrong.
/r/MensRights02/08/21 02:58 PM
2

I'll grant I haven't seen the scene, but couldn't that also just means she's his sister or something? Like "I'm not related to her by choice and we don't get along."?
/r/MensRights31/07/21 04:07 PM
0

To me, it's an interesting age range. 18 yos can still be in high school. And with 19 yos, while they're technically adults, they're also very new to it still. In other words: It's hard to categorize exactly how to think about that age group. Because they are adults. But they're still pretty new to it and have a lot to learn. So when it comes to things like the draft for example, I tend to think "18 yo boy forced to die" given the lack of experience. Whereas in other situations I'll think of the…
/r/MensRights31/07/21 04:05 PM
15

Let's not mutilate the genitals of minors. If it's dumb to have kids gets tatoos they could regret later, that's even more unreasonable to have a boy chop off a natural part of his body.
/r/MensRights31/07/21 03:56 PM
2

movement and people are saying #KAM but when you look at America statistically + the number of Female CEOs/billionaires/government leaders, But when we look at the homeless population we see women are doing a lot better. What you engaged in was the Apex Fallacy. Are most CEOs men? Sure. But most men are not CEOs. Also when it comes to politicians: women are a slight majority of the voters. The voters are who vote. So it seems women, utilizing their voting power, are choosing to elect more men. I…
/r/MensRights28/07/21 01:40 PM
2

I enjoy the camaraderie we can have.
/r/MensRights27/07/21 04:23 PM
4

I don't think Cosby getting released harms #MeToo. If anything it'll strengthen it. Cosby got off on the legal agreement. And so it wasn't a case of "We found evidence he was falsely accused" but rather it can be spun as "Even when evidence exists, rapists get off." So while it may be correct for Cosby to be released (it's important to protect the 5th amendment) it's not a blow to #MeToo.
/r/MensRights27/07/21 03:33 PM
8

Thanks. I hate it. Now take your upvote and never make me read that again.
/r/MensRights25/07/21 05:31 AM
2

i'd agree with your analysis of this PSA if it featured just the Viking leader and his wife, but It doesn't. Even there, I don't think that on it's own was any emasculation either. It's in the context of the wife just wanting her husband to wear a helmet. It's not really any "browbeating" so much as a "Svend... please..."
/r/MensRights23/07/21 05:20 AM
1

r/LeftWingMaleAdvocayes ain't "soyboys." It's a decent sub. r/MensLib has issues, but LWMA is decent.
/r/MensRights22/07/21 03:58 PM
1

Quite a few of them have less than 10 men, more with less than 5,000. So a lot of them really don't mean anything. That said, still...
/r/MensRights22/07/21 03:55 PM
3

Enjoy your fake gold award I love it. Thanks! (And glad I could give you another point of view.)
/r/MensRights22/07/21 02:36 AM
5

Out of curiosity, why do you say to be careful about the second one? Considering your average leftist has no love for TERFs, wouldn't saying that TERFs view transmen is such a manner not be dangerous?
/r/MensRights22/07/21 02:23 AM
33

There's also the question of how well the trans person in question passes. For example I'd expect someone like Blaire White or Buck Angel to have an experience more typical to a cis person because they don't look trans. Whereas someone that doesn't pass as well is much more likely to be treated differently. Consider our hyper-focus on transwomen in society. The narrative is filled with "men are going to assault women in the bathroom." Oftentimes the LibFems and other left-leaners will call that …
/r/MensRights21/07/21 09:39 PM
2

Ww2 they sent in kids as young as 7. You're talking about the Hitler Youth as the Allies pushed into Germany proper at the end, right?
/r/MensRights21/07/21 02:10 PM
1

Does anyone think for one second that a bunch of women are going to line up to be impregnated by one man? A good point. The "you don't need many men to repopulate" argument is definitely flawed in that respect when it comes to American society. While a polygamous society would work like that. And casual sex can function like that to a degree, America is by and large monogamous. And in a monogamous society that means if there's 5,000 women and 10 men. There's a max of 10 women getting pregnant.
/r/MensRights21/07/21 07:15 AM
8

Considering all the other times I've seen stories like this, I'm shocked this is still even a thing. What the frick, UK schools? Let your boys wear shorts,
/r/MensRights21/07/21 07:05 AM
19

I'll start with a big disclaimer that I've never been in a relationship, much less a sexual one. But it feels to me that there's a difference between someone, after a request for sex is denied, doing their own thing as an alternative to the original plan vs that person initiating a silent treatment. The "do your own thing" feels more like a "Hey I respect your decision to not have sex. So I'll go for a ride instead. See you in an hour?" Whereas the silent treatment feels more like "Hey I don't r…
/r/MensRights21/07/21 03:02 AM
1

most women's shelters' addresses are not published Why? I'm guessing partially to make it harder for an abusive partner to find an abused woman that goes to one. But how do the women get there?
/r/MensRights20/07/21 04:17 PM
1

Christina Hoff Sommers I know of Erin and Cassie, but what's the story behind Christina Hoff Sommers?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/21 03:34 AM
1

Or is posting here an autoban? I've commented here a few times. I also commented a couple times on MensLib a while back. No ban yet.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/21 03:23 AM
1

The most salient example of this is a survey showing 5% of Obama voters believe Obama is the Anti-Christ . Well... okay then... Definitely saved these two to my bookmarks. :D
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/21 02:50 AM
6

Source? I'd like to read more about this before sending any email. Edit: If it's the article in the OP, apologies. (I'm reading this quick while on break.)
/r/MensRights19/07/21 11:22 PM
3

She made a Twitter post a while back where she said she supported trans people identifying how they want, but also thought it was important to remember biological sex is real. You can read her words here She also has a post where she objected to the phrase "people who menstruate" and said the word was "women." You can read that post here Personally speaking, I don't think these are transphobic, considering she even said she supports trans identifying as they want. But they are the source of why …
/r/MensRights19/07/21 02:52 PM
6

You forgot one that I think is also useful to illustrate the point. If erections mean consent, then that means little boys can consent. It may be a bit of a nuclear option for most discussions, but it's also a clear example of just how bad the "erection == consent" mindset is.
/r/MensRights17/07/21 03:41 PM
4

These are the men's children too.
/r/MensRights16/07/21 06:05 AM
6

1-485-555-3298; they're open from 9am-5pm Monday-Friday Eastern time.
/r/MensRights15/07/21 06:13 PM
2

Not gonna lie, that surprised me. I've only ever seen the focusing on other things and an ignoring of the misandry. I was a little disappointed at this upvoted comment that seemed to be excusing femcels to a degree. (Minimized their misandry by trying to say it was at least based in real experiences, negating the bad experience male incels may have had.) But in the end it did still condemn the attitude and overall the comments were in the right direction. Plus this thread, also by u\narsfweasels…
/r/MensRights15/07/21 06:09 PM
2

Ptraiarchy theory alone makes modern feminism flawed. And radical feminists, especially including the ones rnamored with "The Future, if there is one, is Female" and its proposal to reduce men to 10% of the population and otevent them from forming groups, are even worse.
/r/MensRights15/07/21 04:32 PM
3

FDS: Men are obsessed with anal. AHS: Oh noes. The homophobia. (Never mind it was meant as an insult to men as a whole not just gay men.) Does AHS post about FDS? Sure. But only for things AHS considers homophobia or transphobia. Never for the misandry.
/r/MensRights15/07/21 04:29 PM
0

I think that lesbian women who "passed" as a man for a few weeks found it out in a brutal fashion. Link? You have me intrigued.
/r/MensRights15/07/21 04:26 PM
11

Agreed. My take on FDS is that it starts from a sane place. Having standards? Okay. Wanting him to contribute to the relationship? Okay. Etc. But then they take the reasonable and ramp it up 5,000 notches into the unreasonable. Having standards in general is fine. But if your expectations are that he's a 6'5" Adonis that makes 6 figures a year but if he has the smallest of standards for you he's a LVM scrote, that's not reasonable. And you are toxic. Wanting him to put effort into the relationsh…
/r/MensRights15/07/21 04:13 PM
-2

There's been a couple gamers that have posted videos of playing Amogus that used voice chat. (Via other means.) So yeah it's possible to have voice chat.
/r/MensRights12/07/21 06:13 PM
5

And? Usually people saying "Wow these people don't like feminism." are saying that to mean "Wow these people are bad." Are you trying to say that the contempt for feminism here is a bad thing? Because lumping it with saying there's dislike of women, to me, implies that as the intent. But as u/DavidByron2 said: Most of us here don't like feminism because it's a bad ideology. And so opposing it is actually the moral thing to do. An example of good ethics on the part of this sub.
/r/MensRights08/07/21 09:13 PM
6

*r/MenKampf No "i".
/r/MensRights08/07/21 02:12 PM
2

He's referring to the draft. The government maintains that it has the right to say to a draft-age man, "Go fight in a war zone where you may die or get maimed." and put him in prison if he refuses.
/r/MensRights08/07/21 02:48 AM
8

I believe that's a flawed take. Women are half of society. Any approach to men's rights that's distrustful of all women is therefore doomed to fail. Women are our mothers. Our wives. Our sisters. Our daughters. Our aunts. Our nieces. Our cousins. Our friends. These are relationships that can be built on love and genuine care. And care at the individual level lays a foundation for care at the societal level. I think of Mothers Of Sons as an example. It has the stories of mothers who,after seeing …
/r/MensRights07/07/21 02:07 PM
2

In regards to it being gendered, I'll read stuff written by MAPs from time to time. And according to them, surveys of places like VirPed (a private online group for non-offending pedophiles) do show a significant male majority. And so overall it's commonly known most MAPs (as far as we know) are male. Now that does pose an interesting question to me though: Are most pedophiles male because males are more likely to be pedophiles? Or are male pedophiles just more likely to realize they're pedophil…
/r/MensRights06/07/21 02:07 PM
5

MRM == Men's Rights Movement (And for posterity: MRA == Men's Rights Activist)
/r/MensRights06/07/21 01:35 PM
2

I think you misread the title. (As I did at first.) This is a positive change. They used to prohibit long hair on boys. Now it's allowed. So no need for a lawsuit.
/r/MensRights02/07/21 03:32 PM
0

Sometimes advice requires saying "You're looking at this the wrong way. Here's a better path." Saying "Yes. Stew in anger." accomplishes nothing. So why shouldn't ThisIsTheEnd6 offer an alternative that could bring positive change to the matter at hand?
/r/MensRights02/07/21 03:29 PM
1

Agoraphobia = fear of large/public spaces.
/r/MensRights27/06/21 11:26 PM
1

Chapter 1 is the first rule about Stand up tall with your back Straight. He talks about the lobsters and hierarchies and goes in a bit how a defeated lobster will often lose its confidence and have more health detriments while a victorious lobster will have the increased seratonin and benefits of being a victor. There's then a shift to discussing things like agoraphobia where the agoraphobe starts out with one panic attack, then that leads them to avoid things more and more until they're trapped…
/r/MensRights27/06/21 08:42 PM
2

Yes. So is 12 Rules for Life. I'm reading that niw, still in chapter 1. It's interesting.
/r/MensRights27/06/21 08:07 PM
3

Foetus is a stage of human life. So that would be akin to saying "That's a baby, not a child." or "That's a teenager, not a child." It argues semantics, not substance.
/r/MensRights26/06/21 01:08 PM
9

Are you me? (Albeit I'm taking some steps now to avoid that. Though COVID really set me back.)
/r/MensRights26/06/21 12:57 PM
1

I wish I could convince others to watch it, but they see “Red Pill” and immediately associate the film with the Red Pill community For what it's worth, I watched it earlier this week and most of the information was a rehash from what I've learned here and by reading Warren Farrel's The Myth of Male Power. So if you can get information through otherwise, it's possible. She also has a TED talk called "Meeting the Enemy." You can find it on YouTube and maybe they'd be willing to see that first? I w…
/r/MensRights26/06/21 12:04 PM
2

But abortion does effect others with the most obvious other being the other parent. I'd say the most obvious other person affected is the child aborted.
/r/MensRights26/06/21 11:54 AM
20

If we're talking purely social issues and not economic, it's a mixed bag. So there's topics I'll naturally be more conservative-leaning on. But there's also topics where I lean on what was traditionally progressive. I'd say I lean overall conservative on social things, but part of that may also be attributed to the left's radical fringes not being pushed against in the mainstream, which can shift some positions that really belong in the center between right-left into being perceived as belonging…
/r/MensRights26/06/21 05:51 AM
1

Allow me to try my hand. The issue with derailing and saying "But FGM is worse" is that it ignores the victims in your midst. In addition not all forms of FGM are cutting the labia. In fact there are more common forms such as removing the clitoral hood that are more common and on a similar level to the version of MGM we refer to as circumcision.) But to avoid the nitty gritty, let's assume for a moment that every case of FGM was that sewn labia. And let's compare that to circumcision. If you liv…
/r/AntiFeminists24/06/21 07:56 PM
4

Counter argument is not needed. Female belief that men cannot be abused/raped etc led to a total breakdown of social norms, similar to the abuse women suffered in previous generations. This led to a backlash from men that resulted in more physical violence as opposed to the psychological and emotional violence that women use to abuse men. The fight or flight response common in mammals resulted in men resorting to physical violence in response to a significant threat to their safety and right to …
/r/MensRights24/06/21 03:30 PM
35

To further support this, remember the pushback to the #NotAllMen? To be honest, I think it may be reasonable for us to push back against #NotAllMen. By saying "not all men" it essentially concedes the point. If your response to "Men are rapists" is "Not all men" then it implicitly puts the "not" group of men as a minority. It gives into the idea of most men being bad. So rather than saying "Not all men" perhaps we should say "Not most men." Whereas #NotAllMen is a weasel-out that grants the poin…
/r/MensRights23/06/21 02:22 AM
10

She advised NOW on rape. So she has been part of the groups. And it's reasonable to assume that the only reason a hateful misandrist who would not call a drugged man waking to find a woman inserting his penis into her without consent a rape victim, merely a man that experienced "unwanted contact, could ever end up being influential in a well-known organization like NOW is if other feminists in those influential positions agreed with her.
/r/MensRights22/06/21 12:22 PM
10

No there's definitely male feminists. You can say it's pretty sad to see them engage in a self-hating ideology, but there's definitely legitimate male feminists. Consider Warren Farrell prior to his men's rights advocacy. I've no doubt he was sincere in his feminist beliefs at that time and not just using it as a way to get sex.
/r/MensRights20/06/21 03:28 PM
1

So yes, a child cant consent to circumcision and there is no medical need for its removal, but much like a huge mole on his face I'm gonna make the decision to have it removed because I think hell be better off for it. Unlike a mole, the foreskin has demonstrable benefits. More nerve endings. Protection of the head. Etc. What benefit do you believe circumcision has?
/r/MensRights18/06/21 02:01 PM
1

I get the argument philosophically I just dont think it holds more value than my personal experience with the issue. For clarity (lest I misunderstand): Are you saying that you agree with the logic of why circumcision is wrong, but are placing your feelings above the logic? Because if I'm understanding you correctly there, I have to disagree. Our emotions can cloud us from rational thinking. So if, despite our emotions, we know something to be objectively true that means we should prioritize the…
/r/MensRights18/06/21 01:27 PM
1

I'm in a similar boat. I'm circumcised. I'm not traumatized. And for the most part I don't think of it beyond intactivist subjects. That doesn't mean MGM is fine though. The newborn boy can't consent to it so it is a violation of his rights. And our personal experiences with non-trauma do nit invalidate the negative experiences of others that have been circumcised.
/r/MensRights18/06/21 04:49 AM
2

Counterpoint: Lay down. Are your armpits closed? How much would a ballsack being compressed in your closed armpit hurt?
/r/MensRights18/06/21 04:22 AM
3

...way to be open to,discussion that could change their mind. I cringed at the self-label of feminist they applied and at the "I'm not like those feminists." But I think it's better they stick around a while so they can see the r/MensRights positions on things and perhaps camoe to understand why so many of us are against feminist ideology,
/r/MensRights15/06/21 01:13 PM
12

Eh. If I recall FDS is TERF-dominated whereas TwoX, with its explicit pro-trans policies, would be LibFem. Both are misandrist ideologies, but slightly different.
/r/MensRights14/06/21 03:47 AM
5

I'm on the fence myself, but I think of this suggestion as akin to policies where a partner is asked to leave the room in order to ask about domestic abuse: if it's optional, then it becomes a problem for those that need it. By taking agency away from the man or woman to make the decision, ot becomes blameless in the case where it would offend. It offers the defence of "It's not that I don't trust you. It's just the law." So while the cases you mentioned it would just be a hassle, for the cases …
/r/MensRights13/06/21 09:16 AM
6

water makes things wet Citation needed
/r/MensRights13/06/21 03:17 AM
6

Where are you posting from???? 😉 My guess is a Cracker Barrel along I34 across the street from Denny's.
/r/MensRights13/06/21 03:02 AM
1

As a an ironic side note about that iconic Goebbels quote about how if you repeat a lie often enough people will believe it: Goebbels didn't actually say that.
/r/MensRights12/06/21 12:55 PM
3

MenKampf != Mein Kampf Look at r/MenKampf to see what he's talking about.
/r/MensRights11/06/21 06:24 PM
3

Wondering the same too. I'm also wondering if it's a caption error or the actual dialogue.
/r/MensRights05/06/21 01:45 PM
7

Dude. Let's not ping usernames.
/r/MensRights27/05/21 05:51 PM
1

Very well, George Miller of 813 W Colorado Blvd, Fairview Heights, DE. Now if I'm right, that'll be impressive.
/r/MensRights27/05/21 05:48 PM
3

What have you done to us? I'll tell you what! r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates is a feminist psy-op from the Deep State that's going to make the water turn us into women! That's what! ( /s obviously ) For anyone that's not familiar with that sub, it's a good one. You can get some of the usual issues with right-left disagreement, but in a nuanced way that's conducive to conversation. And it's got some good resources on MRM stuff. (tinmanblog being a nice recurring source.)
/r/MensRights27/05/21 05:45 PM
6

I often think of the Paradox of Intolerance. You'll see it get used by the far-leftists a lot more than far-right. They say "If you tolerate intolerance, you lose tolerance." And via that justification they justify not even letting "wrongthink" speak. But the bitter irony is that if you look at the full quote, it applies much more to them. (Emphasis mine.) Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are…
/r/MensRights27/05/21 05:19 PM
2

Perhaps yeah. I know that, for me, it was posting in r/TumblrInAction that got my offmychest ban. That said, there's still r/TrueOffMyChest
/r/MensRights27/05/21 05:14 PM
7

There is an ongoing program that's been available for probably 10 years or more that gives women, minorities, and veterans, access to programs like subsidized loans, coaching, business services, and even access to government contracts that white male business owners are excluded from. Which program is that? (If it's the SBA that was mentioned in the OP, my apologies. I'm not familiar with a lot of this stuff.) Though in regards to veterans, I would think that's a valid qualification to give prio…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/05/21 09:52 PM
3

I assume you're talking about recognizing Made To Penetrate as rape?
/r/MensRights25/05/21 03:26 PM
1

!RemindMe 480 hours
/r/MensRights25/05/21 03:20 PM
7

I'd disagree there. In the West we have a tendency to think about the Middle East as the place that has clear-cut examples of men oppressing women. And to be fair, I would agree that women in the Middle East are oppressed. But their oppression is a backfiring of their privilege. And a fuller look at the picture shows that the privileges of Middle Eastern men in comparison to the women are necessities from the extra obligations and duties of Middle Eastern men. For example men may discourage thei…
/r/MensRights22/05/21 02:28 AM
1

You can do it on r/mensrights , r/mgtow or r/mgtow2 . I'd like to throw r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates into the race too. And, conversely, I'd personally advise against r/mgtow. While MGTOW ideals are worth discussing, I do feel that sub in particular can veer into misogyny.
/r/MensRights22/05/21 02:19 AM
3

And on menslib!* Me: *anger forming* I'm about to tell off this SoB aren't I? *Just please first review this list of 107 banned words and 52 banned feelings you must unfeel before you are allowed to express yourself. Me: Oohhhh.... Well played, my friend. Well played.
/r/MensRights22/05/21 02:15 AM
2

All too often the efforts of men to support men are stifled by self interested organisations, dismissed as the ramblings of men's rights activists, or straight up denied. If we want to honestly discuss gender equality, we need to invite all voices to the table. Yet, this is not what is happening. Men’s groups are continually vilified, falsely referred to as hate groups, and their voices are systematically silenced. Cassie Jay If I may ask, which parts exactly are the Cassie Jay quote? Just the m…
/r/MensRights22/05/21 02:04 AM
3

I mean you're right, but that's not the point of this post.
/r/MensRights22/05/21 01:07 AM
2

Well since the comment said and I'd already typed out this response, I'll just reply to you instead because I'd rather not let all that typing go to waste. But first, to quote the person so that people know what the deleted comment said ​ It's not racism, that's why. And it's very telling that this is what white people think racism is. --------------------------- My reply below ----------------------------- Racism is, at its core, treating people differently because of their race, usually negati…
/r/MensRights21/05/21 07:16 PM
5

Another way to get the /s across is with some indicator words. Ex: Scholarships are not for White men, sweaty. Or having '💅' at the end or '👏' between words. (Albeit those can get clunky.)
/r/MensRights21/05/21 04:16 PM
20

Let me get this straight. You're saying that we should organize our rights movements along the lines of the lobsters?
/r/MensRights20/05/21 08:29 AM
3

It's due to the motte and bailey of its overall usage. To give an example: All Lives Matter. The motte of that statement is the reasonable statement that regardless of race, your life matters. The bailey of that statement is a dismissal of concerns for the lives of Black people. So too with Toxic Masculinity. The motte is reasonable. But the bailey of all masculinity and using it to silence men's concerns makes it a bad term.
/r/MensRights19/05/21 04:03 PM
1

Bit off topic for this thread. Were you trying to post elsewhere?
/r/MensRights18/05/21 07:44 PM
8

This is a major contributor when you notice that ten times more boys circumcised die of SIDS than their uncircumcised counterparts. Source? I'd like to have it handy should the debate of "bUt HEalTh bENeFits" comes up. but circumcision has also been linked to mental retardation, probably from blood loss. Source? and can lead to mental disorders like autism. I really doubt that one due to autism being genetic. Source?
/r/MensRights15/05/21 07:07 AM
14

Of all the shit men have to deal with, this is a stupid hill to die on. Just my opinion. To be honest, it's important to speak up about it. Because if it's not spoken about, it'll continue happening. Me, I'm circumcised. And the rare conversations on the topic would be with my mother who had learned the health-benefits angle. It's only because of intactivists that I really got introduced to a different view (and it took coming across it multiple times to finally approach it with a more generous …
/r/MensRights15/05/21 07:04 AM
2

If they're so worried about people from a certain religion not being able to circumcise: just make a religious exemption. For those whose religion doesn't require it, they're not going to go through all the hoops around a religious exemption. So even if by apathy, you prevent a lot of circumcisions.
/r/MensRights15/05/21 06:57 AM
5

What country is this? And yeah, I really don't know what to say about this video. The trauma and that kid's face and how they treated him? It makes me feel like he's gonna be reminded of this every time he pees and sees his mutilated penis.
/r/MensRights15/05/21 04:59 AM
1

Lel. Well thank you, sir, for giving me something to chuckle at tonight. Have a good one.
/r/MensRights15/05/21 02:39 AM
3

No... I'm getting my information from actually seeing a lot of examples of this meme, lol. (Real talk: Are you intentionally trolling here? Or is this something you're legitimately trying to push. Because, in all honesty, if you're not trolling I'm curious where you're getting your own info from.)
/r/MensRights15/05/21 02:37 AM
1

To avoid reposting right away, my comment here has examples of the meme in proper context. Memes, like words, have general set meanings. Much like I can't just say "This thing gazzelles!" and be like, "Dude, words change from place to place. 'gazzelle' in this context is synonymous with 'totally rocks'." you can't just remove a meme from its normative context.
/r/MensRights15/05/21 02:33 AM
2

To further explicate, here are some examples of the meme in its proper usage. 1 2 3 4/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/10851359/4fb.jpg) 5
/r/MensRights15/05/21 02:31 AM
2

No. Because, going by how the meme is actually used, that would be better translated as: Look at this stupid idiot thinking a 6 year sentence for vehicular manslaughter is an example of female privilege. A proper usage of the meme would be if the thing he was gesturing to was "20 year sentence for drug possession" and him saying, "Is this male privilege?"
/r/MensRights15/05/21 02:27 AM
1

DLC Oh yeah... (Side tangent: Makes me think of the Civilization series. I was able to get Civ5 with all DLC at less than $60 because it's older. But try that with the current iteration Civ6? No way.)
/r/MensRights15/05/21 02:13 AM
7

Now that I think about it, it's been roughly 4 or 5 years since a girl commented on my hair being nice. And about a month since a different one mentioned my shirt being nice.
/r/MensRights15/05/21 02:08 AM
43

As I recall that ruling was overturned. Thank God. And yeah, I agree it's boggling such a decision ever got made. The idea of forcing a guy to masturbate so you can get his semen is definitely very rapey.
/r/MensRights12/05/21 09:09 PM
8

I half of my life convinced that being a man was a curse, lost several years in many ways, I was even diagnosed as severe gender dysphoria If I may ask, is that something that's gone away as you've reevaluated how you look at things? Or has it remained? I ask because, to my knowledge, transwomen are significantly more prevalent than transmem. And while there's definitely a core group within that would have gender dysphoria no matter what, I sometimes wonder how much is young boys and men getting…
/r/MensRights12/05/21 03:14 PM
14

100 == 100.00000.... (Exception: When denoting precision in science or declaring variable type via value in programming.)
/r/MensRights11/05/21 05:49 AM
2

To my knowledge (IANAL) those are civil suits for monetary damages, not criminal charges. (Someone please correct me or confirm.)
/r/MensRights10/05/21 12:56 AM
5

false accusations, when actually proven beyond reasonable doubt, should have some kind of penalty. The issue is that there's been cases where it is beyond reasonable doubt but doesn't even get prosecuted. To me, I agree wholeheartedly that there's have to be evidence of false accusation to make a charge. Not just lack of evidence of a rape. So just as we need to hold a mindset of "innocent until proven guilty" for the person accused of rape, so to would we have to hold a mindset of "innocent unt…
/r/MensRights09/05/21 05:58 PM
12

How about we don't reduce a woman to her relationship with penis. It's an insult to both men and women. The two conclusions it leads are "It's men's fault for not giving her dick" and "Can we really blame women if they hold an abbhirent position? Their feeble minds obviously mean they can't be held to any real,standards because it's all about wanting the penis." Neither of those uplift society.
/r/MensRights06/05/21 09:57 PM
4

the man should be allowed to leave the relationship and not support the baby if he didn't wanna have the kid in the first place and the woman forced it on him. To be honest, I go with consistency the other way. To me, people need to understand that sex makes babies. And to kill the innocent child because you weren't ready for a baby when you did the thing that makes babies is an injustice against the child. And that need for responsibility goes for both the woman and the man. And one of the most…
/r/MensRights06/05/21 01:29 AM
-1

Agreed with the fact that women are also pro-life. While feminism has its flaws, one pro-life feminist saying I like is When our liberation costs innocent lives, it is oppression redistributed
/r/MensRights05/05/21 10:01 PM
5

In that regard, we should open abortion to every woman and also force woman to abort if the man ask it. How about no. That's abuse of both the woman and the child. And considering the lament men have had when a woman aborts their child even when he wants the child and would be willing to raise the child alone, I have no intention of foisting that injustice upon women too.
/r/MensRights05/05/21 09:47 PM
23

Come on, dude. We can negate her arguments without calling her fat and ugly. That's just an ad hominem. Your arguments in the comment have merit. Don't marr them with superfluous insults.
/r/MensRights02/05/21 05:45 AM
39

why does it matter what you call it? Because words have meanings. For example punching people is wrong, but ut's not murder. Right now if I say that woman over there is a murderer, you know she killed someone. But if, in an effort to draw attention to victims of punching, I included punches in murder stats. Well now if I say that man over there is a murderer you don't know if he killed someone or punched someone. The word "murder" becomes devalued. So it goes with sexual violence. If a person he…
/r/MensRights02/05/21 05:43 AM
15

Wait that's a Sowell quote? That's neat. I always thought it came from a woke source. (That's generally the context I've heard it from.)
/r/MensRights02/05/21 05:17 AM
1

That's a rough read.
/r/MensRights30/04/21 03:20 PM
3

i’ve been raised to believe (by history teachers) that the “isms” only apply to an imbalance of power. The idea of racism being privilege + power came from a particular academic paper talking about a specific thing. The everyday definition of the "x-isms" is just "Are you discriminating against some purely because of X?" The neo-definition of racism is a top-down redefinition. It is not a natural change over time. And it conflates a specific definition to be the only definition. As an example, a…
/r/MensRights29/04/21 05:27 PM
9

I'm also banned from r/offmychest because I post in r/TumblrInAction (While not the sub's majority focus, there is some calling out of feminism's misandry.)
/r/MensRights29/04/21 07:50 AM
12

AntiHateCommunities (AHC) is the parody. AHS legitimately believes what it says.
/r/MensRights25/04/21 05:44 AM
17

In general I'm against subreddit bans. I'd say even things like FDS should stay up. Becauseas long as the speakers of vile ideologies can speak, we can evaluate them for what they really are. But AHS? I can see an exception there. Because, to properly use the paradox of tolerance, their actions of tolerance against free speech and their actions of trying to get everything they disagree with banned are counter to a free speech society. A sub like FDS may be highly misandrist. But, to my knowledge…
/r/MensRights25/04/21 05:43 AM
11

Based.
/r/MensRights25/04/21 05:38 AM
2

Yeah. You may have thought attempt was sharp, but it was actually flat.
/r/MensRights18/04/21 05:55 AM
0

I'm surprised male masturbators haven't been banned already. I may regret this, but I have to ask: Are you talking about some sort of device (which I've never heard of) or just masturbation itself?
/r/MensRights16/04/21 12:22 AM
5

To be honest, I don't think the idea of "patriarchy" should be accepted in the first place. When feminists state their positions they'll point out things you said as "This is how the patriarchy hurts men too." And they'll pay lip service to wanting to change that because they're about evaluating the role of "patriarchy." In other words, pointing out that "patriarchy" isn't making the world heaven for men won't actually create change. It'll perpetuate more of the same. So the best thing to do is …
/r/MensRights16/04/21 12:17 AM
3

If that person is literally abusing you, there would evedence of that fact. Otherwise you get witch hunts and lynching. Here's my take. For the person being abused: It doesn't really matter if they have the evidence. They should come forward. Accusing a legitimate abuser is the opposite of a witch hunt. But on the societal level we need to still move carefully. So while the person getting abused is within their rights to come forward because they know their claim to be true, society at large is …
/r/MensRights14/04/21 08:29 AM
2

I, too, am curious about a source. ​ !remindme 24 hours
/r/MensRights14/04/21 08:17 AM
-12

In my opinion, the best argument to not study Shakespeare is founded on the question: How much effort is it worth to understand him? I think back to my high school days, particularly Freshman year when we read Romeo and Juliet and how the pages of the book had the play on one side and a glossary on the other. Because there were many words and turns of speech in his writing that aren't really in use today. Because in addition to just reading his words you have to transpose the time barrier. Who e…
/r/MensRights16/02/21 02:58 PM
2

I guess two questions. Question 1: (Just for reference) When it's mentioned that a wider range of topics is permitted, do they still need to be MRA-related? Or would a question like "So what music y'all like?" fit within the scope. (I don't plan on asking such a question, but figured I'd check.) Question 2: When it comes to the topic of reproductive rights for men, just want to see if I know the catevories that encomoasses. (Lusted in no particular order.) Financial abortion Rights over use of d…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/02/21 08:46 AM
5

Without knowing the particular issue, my take is to acknowledge the role women play in society. Women aren't mindless imbeciles without any ability to control their actions. They are perfectly capable of acting on their own accord in accordance with their own beliefs. So when it comes to an issue, it would be foolish to ignore half of society and say it's only men creating issues. So when someone says "men not being emotionally open is toxic masculinity" for example, it's fair to point out women…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/02/21 08:28 AM
8

I'm not really sure what I can say or do that'll help. But I do thank you for sharing.
/r/MensRights16/02/21 07:34 AM
1

I am taking college courses. However that's all online so it's not like I'm on campus during this time.
/r/MensRights14/02/21 01:07 AM
2

And before you disagree, women can also internalize the patriarchy and express those views. Similar to former slaves claiming slavery was better than freedom. Here's a big issue I take with that stance: It assumes women are so weak and pathetic that if they hold negative views towards men then that's a problem caused by men. It shoulders the blame off of the women and onto men. I vehemently disagree. I believe that women are able to have their own views and as such if they have such views, then …
/r/MensRights14/02/21 01:04 AM
2

Check out feminist writing When ideas from feminism such as Patriarchy and blaming issues on Toxic Masculinity are part of the problem, I'll be honest that I'm not inclined that way. I'll also mention that the first and third options you presented are not ones I have access to as the best bet I would've had is to do an institutional login and past experience has shown my university's access doesn't go to those. And with the second I didn't actually even see a place to view the full thing beyond …
/r/MensRights14/02/21 12:37 AM
2

Thanks. I'll have to start looking through it later.
/r/MensRights14/02/21 12:31 AM
1

Technically, probably. But I really don't want to be spending money on books right now. I had a "big" purchase for me last month that was ~$40 so just buying books really isn't something I'd want to go for right now.
/r/MensRights14/02/21 12:31 AM
2

Well The Myth of Male Power and The Hazards of Being Male were two titles I figured I'd look at. I also did a general subject search of "Men's Rights" in the library's search engine. As for the suggestion of asking the library to buy particular books, thank you for that. Not gonna lie, that hadn't crossed my mind at all despite it (once I had the idea in mind from you) being one of the options of the sidebar. Here's to hoping I get lucky!
/r/MensRights14/02/21 12:30 AM
19

Feminists.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/02/21 08:03 AM
3

lol Ghenghis Khan is a feminist icon now? Yas! Slay, Khan! //I'm sorry. I had to. The idea is just too funny.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/02/21 01:52 AM
1

It's not narcissism if it's justified.
/r/MensRights09/02/21 02:50 PM
3

My question is who walks alone at night shit I do. I live in a good area. And night walks are extremely pleasant. You've got solitude as you go about and the sky looks so much bugger in the dark. It's really quite nice.
/r/MensRights09/02/21 02:23 PM
10

You do realize that downvotes effectively hide a comment from view, no? That is censorship. For me, I for one take the 1-click to read a downvoted comment. And I'd imagine a fair amount of others do too.
/r/MensRights06/02/21 03:42 PM
3

wahmyn Please don't resort to such namecalling. It would be better to use the word "women" when referring to women. "Whamyn" just feeds into the "MRAs are all mysognists" propaganda. There were valid points you made with the question of whether women should be included in the draft, bringing up that men have also had hardships in the past, and how some of our institutions now favor women over men. But if you make those points using terminology such as "whamyn" it will be hard to reach across the…
/r/MensRights05/02/21 09:44 PM
12

I found your counterpoints to Myth 9 almost a rehash of some of my own journey. Especially ​ Men are told to keep quiet and many end up internalizing the idea that only women can be discriminated against, since this is what society tells us to believe. ​ I remember the first or second time I ever heard of men's rights. It was ~3 years ago during community college. A friend of mine mentioned the existence of "meninists" and it was something we both laughed at. Because the idea men having any righ…
/r/MensRights04/02/21 07:02 AM
5

I stopped bothering to even attempt engaging them when they banned the topic of male procreation rights (what they callously call "financial abortion"). I'll admit I'm not familiar all the things that subs has done. But in which way did they ban the topic? Was it just the topic specifically of financial abortion they banned? Or other general things such as addressing fathers' rights in regards to adoption and etc.? And as a question, you mentioned them calling it "financial abortion" callously. …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/02/21 09:33 PM
1

I stopped bothering to even attempt engaging them when they banned the topic of male procreation rights (what they callously call "financial abortion"). I'll admit I'm not familiar all the things that subs has done. But in which way did they ban the topic? Was it just the topic specifically of financial abortion they banned? Or other general things such as addressing fathers' rights in regards to adoption and etc.? And as a question, you mentioned them calling it "financial abortion" callously. …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/02/21 09:33 PM
1

I stopped bothering to even attempt engaging them when they banned the topic of male procreation rights (what they callously call "financial abortion"). I'll admit I'm not familiar all the things that subs has done. But in which way did they ban the topic? Was it just the topic specifically of financial abortion they banned? Or other general things such as addressing fathers' rights in regards to adoption and etc.? And as a question, you mentioned them calling it "financial abortion" callously. …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/02/21 09:33 PM
2

I am pregnant with a boy. 25 weeks along Congratulations! I'm happy for you. and hope you raise him right, Considering you said you have a 10 yo daughter, I would think you knowing how to "raise him right" is pretty much a given. And if the implication was "make sure you raise him to not be a rapist" I'll give my own personal anecdote: My mother never needed to sit down with me and say "KalegNar, I probably should've taught you thus sooner, but rape is bad. Don't do it." Or was a given. It takes…
/r/MensRights02/02/21 02:29 PM
1

I'm glad you mentioned the laws coming into play that prevent rapists from getting custody. I was thinking about it earlier today and thinking "Wouldn't that solve the issue?" Do you know any reason why that hasn't been the case?
/r/MensRights02/02/21 06:17 AM
1

It's been sidelined in favor of another ad campaign of "Buy Gilette or you're mysognist." Though, side note: Personally I like having a beard. It adds character to my face. (And when masks aren't around it's a tool, along with my mustache, to easily clue in others that I'm a guy despite the long hair.)
/r/MensRights02/02/21 06:10 AM
17

Two things that really popped out to me. They mentioned that sexism requires it to be institutional. Now let's set aside the question of whether institutional sexism against men or women exists. Let's just focus on the claim itself: If you define sexism as only against women and exclude men from being able to experience sexism because of their sex, haven't you institutionalized a discriminatory practice against an entire sex, therefore meeting your owncriteria and negating the claim that men can…
/r/MensRights31/01/21 07:58 AM
12

They do. It's why some people will say White people can't experience racism. Do I disagree with it because it redefines a term away from its common usage? Yes.
/r/MensRights31/01/21 07:51 AM
9

Saw a post that linked a to this site the other day in r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates. I found a couple of the stories and I think it was an important read. So I'm glad they're doing this site and trying to get word out there.
/r/MensRights29/01/21 07:24 PM
34

Well if you surveyed 100 people and found that, to make some numbers up, 20 said they've been raped by only 5 of those say they've brought it to the police, then you could say 75% of rapes are unreported to the police. Essentially it's a question of looking at the difference of people that self-report having been raped via surveys vs how many reports of rape are brought to the police. So the overall idea itself is reasonable. That said, I'm not sure on the exact methodology they used for this pa…
/r/MensRights29/01/21 07:18 PM
22

Another thing I think about is that when it comes to it, it's not like lacking enough evidence to get a guilty verdict is evidence of a false accusation either. Just as you need evidence to demonstrate guilt of rape, you also need evidence to demonstrate guilt of false accusation. So wouldn't that mean that even if there wasn't enough on behalf of a rape victim to get their rapist convicted, there still wouldn't be enough evidence to show their accusation as false. (Considering it would be legit…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/01/21 02:20 AM
2

Hello. Saw this originally on r/MensRights. (And to be honest, the other crossposts I've seen have all been pretty solid to me so this was nice.) Just wanted to say a couple things. First, and sorry to be "that guy": For the 6 reasons for Trump article you mention it was on collegehumor of all places, but the article was on Cracked. Second, I just wanted to thank you for this. I can definitely agree on radicalizing rhetoric being counterproductive. Over the last few years I've seen in myself a s…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/01/21 09:23 AM
31

Dude. Let's assume your statistic of 93% of rapists being men is correct. (I know I've seen people talk about errors with such stats, but I really don't feel like searching through all that right now.) That begs the next question: What percentage of men is that? A minority. And a small minority at that. So even if we grant that men make up most racists by a landslide, we should be able to agree that the vast majority of men are not rapists. And so to ascribe the actions of a small minority to th…
/r/MensRights23/01/21 07:47 AM
1

!remindme 1 day (I hope that's how this works)
/r/MensRights07/01/21 05:45 AM
8

To be honest I didn't see the series like that. There's no "I'm a woman which makes me better." She has legitimate skill that gets her through and the only time I really remember anyone pointing out specifically that she's girl is the media interview where it's clear she doesn't like the reporter focusing on her gender and would rather talk about chess.
/r/MensRights06/01/21 03:37 PM
2

/funny off In certain fandoms there are always going to be those "movies that were never made been would be really hard to mess up if they were made." Mention the movie on r/TheLastAirbender for example and you'll find that Shyamalan's... attempt is one such case. And I'll admit that I thought mentioning things directly from the movie while saying it didn't exist and saying "The Earth King has invited you to Lake Laogai" directly after the first statement that it was "404 page not found" was eno…
/r/MensRights04/01/21 09:38 PM
2

Seems that Netflix link was about titles related to The Last Airbender which brought up an awesome animated series, but no movie. And that wikipedia link was also saying "page not found" and suggested terms related to "The Last Airbender" which was again only a link to a page about the great animated series. And it's really a shame that there's no movie of it because as I said before, it'd be pretty hard to mess it up. You'd have to do some silly stuff like making the Fire Nation Indian for no r…
/r/MensRights04/01/21 08:00 PM
2

I'm confused. The page says "404 Not Found: The Earth King has invited you to Lake Laogai." No evidence of a movie existing, which is weird for imdb.
/r/MensRights04/01/21 06:14 PM
4

Sorry to ruin the joke, but which book are you talking about? I was initially thinking Darwin's The Origin of Species but your emphasis on a snappy title and those particular questions made me figure you're talking about a different book.
/r/MensRights04/01/21 04:31 PM
2

I'll join the others in recommending Avatar the Last Airbender. Loved that show as a kid and it's still a pleasure to watch.
/r/MensRights04/01/21 04:28 PM
2

Avatar the Last Airbender (not the movie.... for the love of god, not the movie) I don't believe a movie was ever made. So why do people keep talking about some non-existent live action adaptation? Though I will say if a live action happened I imagine it'd be pretty good. You'd have a lot of source material and would have to do some pretty silly stuff like, oh I don't know, mispronouncing character names and changing firebending's mechanics to make it flop.
/r/MensRights04/01/21 04:26 PM
3

Where are you from? In the US Adolf is by no means a common name at all. On the contrary it's indelibly tied to Hitler in particular. It's true that Adolf used to be a common name, just as the toothbrush mistache used to more prevalent. But both of those are so tied to Hitler that they aren't common at all these days.
/r/MensRights02/01/21 08:46 AM
1

Do you recall what his response was or have a video? Just curious.
/r/MensRights18/12/20 06:36 AM
3

Side note, since 'tis the season, Immaculate Conception is an often misused phrase. Jesus is referred to as the Virgin Birth. The Immaculate Conception on the other hand is referring Mary's conception without sin. (The fact that the Feast of Immaculate Conception comes in December adds a bit to confusion though in all fairness.)
/r/MensRights14/12/20 08:14 AM
0

If you weren't ready for the possibility of having a child, why did you have sex? Not wanting the child your chosen action caused to come into being isn't a justification to kill them. Also, adoption is an option. And it's a way for you to relieve your parental duties while giving them a new family to have a life in. (And for newborn adoption, there are more families looking to adopt than babies to adopt.) So if you're not ready, that's an alternative.
/r/MensRights06/12/20 04:42 PM
3

Well first off, while things like The Pill reduce the odds of getting pregnant, they don't eliminate them. So without other evidence I wouldn't assume she was lying about being on it. Second, she's already stated that she wouldn't ask you for money or anything. But in all honesty, if she's right that you're the father, that's your kid. Your child. A life you helped to create. I understand that it can definitely be nerve-wracking that you're dealing with this new information that you may have a k…
/r/MensRights24/11/20 08:00 PM
1

Ah. That makes a lot more sense now. No problems.
/r/MensRights18/11/20 05:47 AM
1

Which parts? (Legitimately curious.)
/r/MensRights18/11/20 05:46 AM
1

Obviously not. Though which part of what I said led to you asking that question? Because I think there have been a misunderstanding of my intended message.
/r/MensRights18/11/20 05:37 AM
5

The only one that may have case is the one he was dry humping. Big whoop. Dont fall asleep on a bed with a young guy who is clearly horny, dummy. Um... that's not a good defense for his actions. It can be a a piece of advice in regards to "this is a situation you want to remove yourself from" but it in no way excuses his actions. Common sense tells you "Don't dry-hump a sleeping person."
/r/MensRights18/11/20 05:23 AM
4

I'll agree there. The things mentioned in the allegations definitely aren't normal behavior. If you're touching a persons arms and hair and they ask you to stop, you stop. If you ask a person for a kiss and they say "No." you don't keep pestering them for another 20 minutes. You accept that they don't want to kiss. And it should be basic common sense to not dry-hump a sleeping person. And if they wake up so you pin them down and continue to grope that while they say "No." that is unquestionably …
/r/MensRights18/11/20 05:20 AM
6

My thoughts would be that the word "pervert" would be more accurate to the accusation given that can be used for same-age cases. And I will say I'm sorry you're getting bullied over something you didn't even do.
/r/MensRights11/11/20 07:48 AM
1

Yeah I knew I would be called an 'incel' (demeaning term for men) the minute I started writing this whole post, but whatever I don't care. As one thing I will say that I didn't use the phrase "incel-like vibe" as a means of insult. Rather it was the best term I could think of to describe a general view. If it offended you personally, I apologize. But it was not my intent. As for the rest, I still stand by what I said before. As for now, I'm really not sure what I can say if you don't see the dif…
/r/MensRights09/11/20 06:40 AM
1

To be honest, since reading this reply, I've been going back and forth in my head for like the last hour or two thinking about what to say. And I keep waffling on how I want to say what I have to say. I'll also admit, now that I've finished, there is some meandering. But I hope that what I've written still comes off clear. To start, I want to tell you a little about the man on the other end of the screen so that you know a little bit about where my words come from. I am not some 6' Greek God. I'…
/r/MensRights09/11/20 04:44 AM
1

There's more options to have sex than marriage or prostitution... Putting aside that I think society in general is too sex-focused, dating is pre-marital and is not uncommon to also include sex. There's even sites more,focused,towards 1-night stands than actual relationships. And absent a partner, the mechanics of masturbation are simple. So I wouldn't say prostitution being illegal is a means of oppressing men.
/r/MensRights08/11/20 10:35 PM
6

First one was good and fun. When Newt gets to Newt, it's entertaining. When it's about Fantastic Beasts, it's fun. But Crimes definitely focused away from the, well, Fantastic Beasts, which shows a bad direction for the rest. Since the lore Rowling is building there isn't too interesting and has some boring characters.
/r/MensRights06/11/20 10:13 PM
0

If urinals were humiliating, they wouldn't,be my goto in a bathroom.
/r/MensRights02/10/19 12:20 PM
5

You mean the reverse where we'd be staring at each in a circle whilen urinating to assert dominance over the pack?
/r/MensRights02/10/19 12:15 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter