Kalel9798 Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
6	Teetering the line...		Kalel9798	/r/MGTOW	05/11/18 09:19 PM

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
7	Man child checking in. You’re a bit older than I am, and our career paths are different, but beyond that, I could have easily written this myself.	/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre	07/09/20 02:49 PM
3	Genuine question For me, it’s not that Unicorn Women don’t exist, but rather that it’s so few & far between that it’s a huge risk to try to find one that I’m compatible with. If 1% (even that may be too high of a number) of women are Unicorns, then it’s extremely difficult to sift through the other 99%. I’m not entirely opposed to the idea of possibly meeting one in that 1%, but I know the chances of that are incredibly slim.	/r/MGTOW	14/11/19 09:48 PM
1	Teetering the line... I’m not actually interested in marriage, because I do agree that divorce laws are definitely biased against men, but I’m also not currently opposed to potential companionship either.	/r/MGTOW	05/11/18 11:30 PM
1	Teetering the line... For the most part, it was it wasn’t because it was “labeled that way by the left.” It was because in reading various posts for months, more often than not, posters would self-identify as religious, conservatives or right-ringers. I try not to use extreme labels, but apply definitions that fit the descriptions. I don’t think everyone on the right is a nazi lol nor is the left all communists snowflakes lol.	/r/MGTOW	05/11/18 11:29 PM
1	Teetering the line... I can see your point. It’s definitely a struggle some days when having conversations that get confusing because my definitions do not match up with the more “urban dictionary” type definitions.	/r/MGTOW	05/11/18 10:18 PM
1	Teetering the line... “Why” would be because of basic animalistic desire. “How” seems to be very specific chosen manners, depending on the guy’s preferences, but never anything that leads to relationships or cohabitation.	/r/MGTOW	05/11/18 10:16 PM
1	Teetering the line... I tend to follow literal definitions as much as possible, therefore I stick to the original “involuntarily celibate” version meaning they wish to have sex, but can’t due to being found unattractive or whatever. Anything in their actions beyond that might be an adverse reaction to the condition, but not technically in the definition.	/r/MGTOW	05/11/18 10:00 PM
2	Teetering the line... Good input, I appreciate the response. I’m registered as a Democrat that way I can participate in primaries and such. I’m more left-leaning than right, but vote independent a lot of times.	/r/MGTOW	05/11/18 09:56 PM
1	Teetering the line... Labels are nothing more than definitions of actions. Didn’t mean it as “putting someone in a tiny box”, but more of noticing the commonality of it. I asked the question to see just how common it was. I see that many of you interact, and still have sexual relations with women, therefore not incels. That much, I’m aware of.	/r/MGTOW	05/11/18 09:48 PM
2	Teetering the line... Didn’t mean it as being a requirement. Just that it seemed the most common. Literally, the reason i asked the question was to see just how common it actually was. Thanks for your reply.	/r/MGTOW	05/11/18 09:44 PM
1	Teetering the line... I can see where people would label me as incel, but I don’t think I entirely fit the definition. However, I could be mistaken. I have had sexual partners, just not very many (more than 5, but less than 10), plus women who came on to me, but I wasn’t interested in them.	/r/MGTOW	05/11/18 09:35 PM