TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Kalsone Archive

View 0 posts and 160 comments by Kalsone on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

They're making a joke about big black cock.
/r/MensRights21/06/26 02:11 PM
10

Screwing. Probably.
/r/MensRights15/05/26 10:38 AM
1

That's a whole lot of words. I only need one to counter it. Afluenza.
/r/MensRights13/05/26 10:19 PM
4

That's rich people.
/r/MensRights13/05/26 07:47 PM
1

If you brought your Tyranid army to the office I could get behind this, or even like beef jerky. Raw meat? Eh no.
/r/MensRights22/04/26 08:12 PM
0

It's not a gynocentric approach. It's powerful men demonizing less powerful men and creating the permission structure to abuse and kill them. My recollection of the fighting age males discussion came out of Iraq and the US military declaring teenagers and men valid targets for killing.
/r/MensRights11/04/26 02:53 PM
1

So why did you make a deal about a black woman threatening a man? Is that relevant?
/r/MensRights03/04/26 08:04 PM
0

It would be great if the powerful people who built and resource that prison system did something about all the men getting raped in it. What color do you think their skin is?
/r/MensRights03/04/26 12:07 PM
1

They were marginalized. Now they hit their goals 5 years early.
/r/MensRights01/03/26 07:25 PM
2

It's for a Canada Research Chair position to increase diversity in a very select group of publicly funded academics. When it started, women and minorities were way less represented in CRC positions than their share of the population or of those who graduated university. As of 2025, it exceeded the 2029 targets, but more women than men go to university so who knows if they'll up them more. Privileged women changed the system and its working for them. Homeless men on the other hand, well everyone …
/r/MensRights01/03/26 07:17 PM
-5

Lots of people are retards socially. There's a good chance this guy is one of them.
/r/MensRights28/02/26 04:44 AM
-1

Sure buddy.
/r/MensRights28/02/26 02:35 AM
1

So look it up. You're on the internet buckaroo. ETA the movie. Not the song.
/r/MensRights28/02/26 02:30 AM
-7

As we all know from the documentary American Pie. And those guys kept getting in their own way.
/r/MensRights28/02/26 02:24 AM
-23

He wasn't called a predator, but being desperate to lose virginity can lead to behaviors that can be threatening and predatory. Watch some old pick up artist videos, or even women and girls reacting to guys going beast mode in public places for examples. Shit, The Game spells it out. And those are systematic studied and practiced approaches. Keep an eye out at bars or house parties. Watch long enough and you'll spot some desperate guy who goes from woman to woman trying really hard and putting t…
/r/MensRights28/02/26 02:18 AM
-34

Read the comment and I disagree with your interpretation. Desperate people act weird, and it can be said, predatory.
/r/MensRights27/02/26 11:52 PM
-3

So what your saying is the news media is divisive in countries with Rupert Murdoch media companies?
/r/MensRights11/02/26 10:42 PM
-2

Can you just say what you want plainly?
/r/MensRights11/02/26 09:28 PM
2

DT Jr also used it during the 2016 election in reference to Syrian refugees. .https://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2016-37416457
/r/MensRights30/12/25 06:21 AM
-17

She didn't do much and he's a traditional guy and doesn't expect her to do anything unless he wants a blow job. That's a bad fucking sign. Setting the bullshit aside, he's in a dangerous position.
/r/MensRights12/12/25 12:53 AM
1

Please, go get an independent elected from outside the party system. I'll wait. eta So you commit a single cause fallacy and when I challenge you to go do it you block. Nice.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/08/25 02:56 PM
0

That's all well and good, but the parties have duopolistic access to political power and wielding it. The formation of voting blocks is going to happen in democratic systems, and those blocks build rules and organizations to ensure their block continues to access power. Individuals rarely have the resources necessary to run outside the party system for higher office, and third party and unaligned groups with sufficient numbers to make an impact usually siphon votes from the group most ideologica…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/08/25 02:30 PM
3

A different take away like what? Repeat cut a liberal and a fascist bleeds while wondering how there could once again be concentration camps in the US? Want to talk about why labor is chasing centrists? Most of our coworkers aren't leftists. Often they aren't politically involved at all. But they aren't going to be receptive to political education from people that annoy them. Persuasion matters, and that takes affinity. Also those labor leaders are elected at multiple levels. If they aren't buil…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/25 01:24 PM
5

That was the obvious conclusion from my first statement. You're being silly. Disbanding the Democratic party without mass base support of an alternative is unilateral disarmament and benefits the fascists.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/25 12:57 PM
4

Instead of sitting on liberals, the left needs to work with them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/25 12:51 PM
2

"One of the repeated themes was..."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/25 12:45 PM
5

Behind the Bastards did a nice mini-series on the fascist rise to power pre-WWII and one of the repeated themes was when liberals and left fought eachother, the fascists won.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/25 12:26 PM
1

What makes it a false dichotomy? Is there a viable third party at state and national levels?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/25 12:21 PM
8

I looked at her Instagram to check for the content and didnt find it after a few minutes of seeing just influencer stuff. Content farmers gonna farm.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/01/25 06:04 PM
5

The interviewer set up a false dichotomy and she answered in those terms. "Izzy was asked: 'Would you call your dad a daredevil or an idiot?' " And she was talking about him breaking the law drifting through round abouts.
/r/MensRights12/01/25 02:32 PM
0

Got anything direct or just implications? Read her stuff? She's as crazy as people who speak in tongues.
/r/MensRights10/01/25 03:03 AM
2

I read some exerpts of Gerhards and she sounded like a religious zealot that turned away from the Christian God and decided to be crazy about paganism instead. But saying these two call for.targeting babies is a strong claim and I'd like to see something substantial to back it up. Linking to their wiki pages makes.it look like there's something there, but in scanning briefly, I didn't see anything like that.
/r/MensRights09/01/25 10:41 PM
2

Where did they advocate abusing babies?
/r/MensRights09/01/25 07:53 PM
7

His support has fallen far enough that his party is telling him they lack confidence in his leadership. His government continues as long as his party members and several from another party give a majority of votes of confidence. His own party members voting no confidence would be a historical embarrassment. In this type of party system, the gov can fall at any time if it can't survive a confidence vote, but usually a leader can at least count on their party.
/r/MensRights07/01/25 02:28 AM
-31

Sure bro
/r/MensRights28/11/24 06:51 AM
-28

The far left in the police department?
/r/MensRights28/11/24 05:53 AM
3

You aren't reaching men this way. Feminists when they are being inclusive, refers to men as being allies. At other times we get bear > man.
/r/MensRights14/11/24 12:01 AM
0

The last bill in the US to deal with conscription was voted on in 1940. There were 6 women total in both houses of Congress. The 118th Congress had the highest share of women at 153 of 540 between both houses. The people who voted for conscription were men. The group with the numbers to overturn conscription are men.
/r/MensRights13/11/24 11:50 PM
0

Because I like that we have vaccines, that research is being done to treat illnesses that are harming people. I don't believe in your God and I don't care about your moral castigations. If you don't agree with it then live your life in line with those values but leave the rest of us alone.
/r/MensRights13/09/24 12:57 PM
0

Private companies get grants and tax breaks for research, and if they want their IP protected need to file paperwork with the patent office. We do know, or at least CAN know what is being done. If you have evidence of what is actually happening then present it. Otherwise this brain worm shit is a waste of time.
/r/MensRights12/09/24 03:26 PM
-1

Human tissues in general or fetal tissues? Fetal tissue is used for fillings, like for teeth? The edited video presented doesn't say what the tissue was being used for, IT DOESNT CONNECT TO YOUR CLAIM. You keep saying oh its a 10 year old article but research takes years. A stage three drug trial can take 1-5 years. More over your position crumbles if I just find a more recent article like this one: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10724055/ Your source is a biased propaganda piece o…
/r/MensRights12/09/24 01:18 PM
1

How is it different? Don't speculate, show me.
/r/MensRights12/09/24 04:41 AM
-1

This person is providing you with a deceptively edited video and making strong claims without strong supporting evidence. Where's the evidence that sex reassignment surgery is being done on teens, or that the removed organs are being used for money? There isn't because the removed penis is used to make the new sex organs https://www.mountsinai.org/locations/center-transgender-medicine-surgery/care/surgery/male-to-female#:~:text=visible%20after%20healing.-,Vaginoplasty,had%20orchiectomy%20in%20th…
/r/MensRights12/09/24 01:11 AM
1

The media cherry picks stories. Check a professional newsletter from teacher licensing boards and you'll notice under discipline that most of the hearings involve men.
/r/MensRights05/09/24 06:28 PM
-3

No matter how high the wall there would still be men trying to get in!
/r/MensRights01/09/24 11:28 PM
2

Yeah I read about before. Women get more off ramps and deferrals until their criminal history is so extensive that they finally get treated like men.
/r/MensRights29/08/24 06:01 PM
7

It's been a while since I verified, but the prison population is usually excluded in the standardization of iq tests and in studies that use iq tests with gender differences as a variable. It's a big confound.
/r/MensRights29/08/24 03:02 AM
-4

Like I said, the loosening of the job market now is being caused by the Fed with tight monetary policy, that is, higher interest rates to slow the economy. Jerome Powell has chosen to slow wage growth to bring inflation down. 2022 https://www.politico.com/news/2022/11/30/feds-powell-inflation-workers-wages-00071403 2022 saw the highest ever wage increase at 15.28% year over year https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/wage-growth#:~:text=Wage%20Growth%20in%20the%20United,U.S.%20Bureau%20of%20…
/r/MensRights23/08/24 12:10 AM
-8

Labor market was not in the employees favor under Trump. Biden admin saw much stronger wage growth from the tight labor market. It's gotten worse recently because the Fed has been hard on the brakes with tight monetary policy.
/r/MensRights22/08/24 11:22 PM
-1

I don't know why it would make you embarrassed to be a Democrat. Embarrassed to still watch CNN sure.
/r/MensRights22/08/24 11:16 PM
1

It could have been anyone. Go find the vandals. If the cops had cracked down, the way you want they'd still have to go into those communities the day after and it would be even worse for them to do their jobs. To your point, Trump disrupted an ongoing operation to get a photo op with religious symbols and caused a hash of it. Then there's the military parade he ordered that took away independence day leave from all of the soldiers forced to participate. He's so vain.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 01:29 PM
2

Someone started a fire in the basement. At the time that President Trump did his little walk over the clergy were ministering to the protestors. They had served pizza to them too. https://www.npr.org/2020/06/01/867532070/trumps-unannounced-church-visit-angers-church-officials eta it's also clear from your article that the agencies scrambled after hearing the president was coming and were more forceful and disorganized than they would have been.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 01:05 PM
8

Losing an election, 60 court cases, and trying to stop the transfer of power is pretty authoritarian. So is clearing a bunch of protestors so that you can go for a walk with some generals to a church, hold the Bible upside down for a photo, then go back home. And all of the oaths of loyalty the cabinet gave whenever they were on TV. I've seen some scummy ass licking, but that was the wettest rim job allowed on cable.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 01:40 AM
2

Is it confirmed that it was the DNA test that was failed or the testosterone part of IBAs standard?
/r/MensRights02/08/24 07:00 PM
22

Did the coach or athlete reveal they has a diagnosed medical condition or are we taking the word of an athletic body that's considered too corrupt to regulate the sport?
/r/MensRights02/08/24 12:04 PM
8

Waking my brain up with some exercise.
/r/MensRights19/05/24 01:16 PM
11

It was vague. You could have chosen to prove how all men are violent rapists. Are you claiming to have knowledge of OP and that their rant is fake?
/r/MensRights19/05/24 01:15 PM
11

Self incriminate? What laws did you break? Did you try and false accuse someone and it blew up on you?
/r/MensRights19/05/24 01:09 PM
8

Prove it.
/r/MensRights19/05/24 01:01 PM
12

What makes him a pos?
/r/MensRights19/05/24 12:39 PM
1

The female pedos get news attention. Pick up the magazines where teachers licensing boards publish the disciplinary actions and you'll see its largely men being investigated and discipline despite most teachers being female. Stories of attractive female teachers drive clicks.
/r/MensRights04/05/24 12:56 PM
3

The admission rate was based on the application rate.
/r/MensRights08/03/24 10:26 PM
3

The dropout rate for the year that graduated after covid was high for the school and still under 10% for all students. It follows that most of its graduates are female.
/r/MensRights08/03/24 12:20 PM
79

I worked at a med school as a student TA. The admission rate was 6:1 women to men.
/r/MensRights08/03/24 03:56 AM
-3

PP isn't shaming people into it. Turns out they weren't even offering the procedure before in state in the article.
/r/MensRights04/03/24 12:46 PM
26

Another case where a woman gets an off ramp from the legal system where a man would get the max. It typically takes a long established criminal history before women get equality before the law and treated like guys do.
/r/MensRights28/02/24 12:45 PM
65

She did get away with it.
/r/MensRights28/02/24 12:41 PM
1

Let me know when it happens.
/r/MensRights20/02/24 01:31 PM
0

People laugh when they are nervous. Kids too. Meant to diffuse tension.
/r/MensRights19/02/24 11:45 PM
-9

If women are seeing your dick at the trough in the video you should probably face the wall when hanging out. Or get it some peanuts.
/r/MensRights19/02/24 11:42 PM
-4

It might not be considered rape in Virginia. It only counts as statutory rape there if the victim is under 13 apparently. https://www.tkevinwilsonlawyer.com/library/rape-crimes-and-penalties-in-virginia.cfm#:~:text=Under%20Virginia%20Code%20%C2%A718.2,threats%2C%20intimidation%2C%20or%20force.
/r/MensRights14/02/24 11:38 AM
6

Yeah you trollin'.
/r/MensRights31/01/24 03:41 PM
3

There's logical limits to FAFO. Being a psycho until the end of time isn't logical. Used to be a time you'd get in a fight with someone and that would finish it. None of this carrying a grudge and trying to destroy someone's life for ever. Particularly if it hurts kids. That's just shitty.
/r/MensRights31/01/24 03:33 PM
1

Yeah that's crazy behavior. Move on with your life and stop being a psycho.
/r/MensRights31/01/24 03:12 PM
4

So you fucked over that dude because of his association with someone who didn't like you in highschool?
/r/MensRights31/01/24 03:02 PM
0

And much of Space-X's success can be credited to Gwynne Shotwell, who is really under appreciated by the broader public. Musk's companies would do better if he just kept finding competent people to run ops and he held the bag. Opening his mouth publicly is a distraction and ends up pushing the companies in bad directions to.back stop his ego.
/r/MensRights31/01/24 02:55 PM
1

Nah. Hyperloop broke my rose colored sun glasses. That and calling the cave rescuer a pedo out of spite. Cybertruck and semi is when a lot of people started to realize it was a sham.
/r/MensRights31/01/24 05:58 AM
-1

Dunno about zip2 but space-x and tesla got huge government support.
/r/MensRights31/01/24 05:54 AM
-1

Yup. Hyperloop was a pr exercise to distract attention and capital when some states were looking at large public transport projects.
/r/MensRights31/01/24 05:50 AM
1

Amaaaazing. I gave you examples of exactly what you said in my post. If you aren't going to read it why bother? Eta: seriously. I made your argument for you and you want to pretend like I'm helpless. You need training wheels.
/r/MensRights26/01/24 01:04 AM
1

Cool adhom. Doesn't explain how it follows. Kthnxbai
/r/MensRights26/01/24 01:03 AM
1

We're getting pretty close together here. My last paragraph I was specifically thinking of sports, fitness and self defense and left the door open. And then you go.misrepresenting my argument. My usage of toxic masculinity is the subset of stereotypically masculine behaviors that are expressed by intentionally harming others (certain limits aside, though even then... ). It's easily adapted to toxic femininity by replacing masc with fem.
/r/MensRights26/01/24 01:02 AM
1

Making generalizations based on statistics is one of the reasons we have statistics. You describe large sets of data, then draw inferences from it. Would you rather rely on anecdotes, superstitions, and myths to determine how things are related, if at all? Judging individuals based only on statistics is the bad idea. Men are more violent. Despite people repeatedly trying to say just look at intimate partner violence and the near equivalence there, most violence is committed by men and against me…
/r/MensRights25/01/24 11:18 PM
1

I don't care about your shit tests. I manned up years ago.
/r/MensRights25/01/24 05:40 PM
1

Ipv accounts for 15%. It's a narrow slice. You have evidence to suggest that it's a leading indicator, then please present it. I don't think we're in a gynocratic system. There isn't some group of women running things. Wealth, and therefore influence is still very much concentrated in the hands of a few men or the relatives of those few men who inherited or won it in divorce. Those guys aren't running a patriarchy for the benefit of men. A big part of their system is keeping other men in line so…
/r/MensRights25/01/24 03:33 PM
0

How much of total violence is IPV? 15%. https://ncadv.org/STATISTICS#:~:text=Intimate%20partner%20violence%20accounts%20for%2015%25%20of%20all%20violent%20crime.&text=Women%20between%20the%20ages%20of,abused%20by%20an%20intimate%20partner.&text=19%25%20of%20domestic%20violence%20involves%20a%20weapon. That's a narrow subset of physical aggression. It's slightly larger than a slice of pizza if you cut it in 8 equal pieces. The generalization that men are more physically violent still holds. And w…
/r/MensRights25/01/24 03:28 PM
1

So instead of accepting the total data set you want to slice a narrow piece off that you know has a different skew and then argue that disproves the whole? Give me a break my man. The corollary to what I said is that men are more physically aggressive against men. It's not just feminist lit that sees men as maladjusted. It's society and the legal system as well, as exemplified by how men don't get the same off ramps in the legal system that women do at all stages. Its only when women build up an…
/r/MensRights25/01/24 01:31 PM
0

Yes toxic femininity exists. Maybe toxic (fe)male traits are a better term for it. If you read on my responses included with citation that women are aggressive through social actions while men tend to be physically aggressive. Yoy were so keyed up to prove me wrong that you skipped the part about the kid getting hit in the face with a thrown apple. That would be the physical aggression. So when I was keeping myself from sleep about the bullying part, I should have phrased it better because women…
/r/MensRights25/01/24 01:16 PM
1

I agree with you that toxic gender norms exist. Using the more inclusive form makes sense. But that includes toxic femininity and toxic masculinity so people who argue there isn't toxic aspects to masculinity cannot use that more inclusive term to begin with. And guys need to be better able and ready to define toxic femininity. But most of what I've been arguing with here is people who don't understand how generalizations and statistics work.
/r/MensRights25/01/24 01:08 PM
1

Yes. Point it out, drop a scientific reference to back it up and then go your own way. Giving them more attention is what they want and they can call up a whole chorus of other women to drown you out and they are going to complain regardless. I am old enough to remember when they were still trying to get into male dominated spaces and kept saying they wanted men to be more emotionally available and open up and talk to them. Now they've labeled that emotional labor and disregard male loneliness a…
/r/MensRights25/01/24 12:50 PM
2

Physical aggression is a masculine trait. "It has been reported widely that while men tend to express physical, overt, and direct aggression, women tend to express relational and indirect aggression more often" https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6318556/#:~:text=It%20has%20been%20reported%20widely,5%2C6%2C7%5D. Or are you saying it's not toxic? The circumstances where physical aggression isnt toxic are limited and when being physically aggressive isn't toxic behavior, its probanly beca…
/r/MensRights25/01/24 06:44 AM
0

I did not use exclusionary language. In general, men are physically aggressive and women socially. That you have observed women get physical doesn't disprove the generalization. Look up "gender differences aggression" and the articles will pour forth.
/r/MensRights25/01/24 06:18 AM
1

There are gender differences in how men and women do bad things. I didn't say women weren't violent. I said they usually use social ways to attack, that is relationships with others. "It has been reported widely that while men tend to express physical, overt, and direct aggression, women tend to express relational and indirect aggression more often" https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6318556/#:~:text=It%20has%20been%20reported%20widely,5%2C6%2C7%5D. You can extrapolate this to the macr…
/r/MensRights25/01/24 06:15 AM
-7

Women are more likely to use relationships to attack others. Men tend to be, or at least used to be, more direct and physical. There's no point hiding from the term just because it hurts your feelings.
/r/MensRights25/01/24 05:59 AM
1

Sure it does. The gay guy didn't follow traditional gender norms, and was the subject of physical aggression because of it from a particularly stupid guy. While women can do things like that, they are more likely to use social aggression over physical. Just look at the other dirt bag that responded to me saying the kid deserved it.
/r/MensRights25/01/24 05:57 AM
-4

Physical aggression isn't a traditionally masculine trait? Establishing and reinforcing dominance hierarchies aren't something adolescent males do? Or do you want to pretend it's not "toxic" behavior because you don't like the word or admit that this shit happens? Go ahead and explain how it doesn't follow.
/r/MensRights25/01/24 05:50 AM
-2

He dated guys.
/r/MensRights25/01/24 02:37 AM
1

Okay there bud.
/r/MensRights25/01/24 02:06 AM
19

I wonder which of the best actress nominees would they drop for Margot Robbie?
/r/MensRights25/01/24 01:47 AM
8

Forget that. Talk up male role models and demand more good ones.
/r/MensRights25/01/24 01:42 AM
-11

Toxic masculinity exists. It's a big part of bullying. I remember sitting in the cafeteria in highschool when a guy called a gay guy a faggot as he threw an apple across the room which hit the gay guy in the face. There was no reason for it other than being a dick. Less talked about is positive masculine traits, which still get depicted a lot in media, but talking glowingly about Captain America's maleness won't get clicks. ETA: my wording about bullying made it sound like I think only men bully…
/r/MensRights25/01/24 01:41 AM
2

Keep going right past the article.
/r/MensRights22/01/24 11:42 PM
1

Cue Frank Gallagher discovering his populist side.
/r/MensRights17/01/24 12:54 AM
4

Probably the result of Mandatory minimum sentencing guidelines.
/r/MensRights14/01/24 04:48 AM
8

Statistics around gender differences in sentencing isn't a serious issue worth discussing? Please tell me more about manspreading....
/r/MensRights13/01/24 03:17 AM
1

If anyone is getting graded on a curve it's those stem folks having to take women's studies. Few things crush creativity like having to write undergrad science papers. And I don't have a reference for that.
/r/MensRights11/01/24 10:33 PM
10

You mean "DAVID"? Yeah he's full of shit. Fucker owes me money too. It's the internet, start with the assumption they are liars.
/r/MensRights08/01/24 02:10 PM
0

What University gives bonus points for showing up on time? I've had profs that would put you on blast for being late and keep you out until the break so that you wouldn't interrupt others who did get there on time, but no brownie points for doing what was expected. And complaining about homework? So like literature courses in the past didn't have to do the readings? Past science classes you weren't expected to prepare for labs so you know what you are doing when you show up and why? I'm calling …
/r/MensRights08/01/24 01:48 PM
7

It would be a good promo for lady ballers.
/r/MensRights04/01/24 07:08 PM
9

Some APA members helped standardize the torture program but Mitchell was in the military before he went to school for psych and got his psych degrees. But lots of practicing and academic psychologists are part of the APA, and so are undergrads. It's as easy to join as signing up for a mailing list and paying a nominal fee. Mitchell and Jensen drew from SERE training, which was based on torture US military members may face if captured. Lynndi England might be the most famous because it's a woman …
/r/MensRights31/12/23 07:53 PM
19

What's the direct line? Is the CIA backing the dog walker lady?
/r/MensRights31/12/23 02:03 PM
2

Apparently to give the mod team time off.
/r/MensRights27/12/23 05:18 PM
35

They go private around Christmas
/r/MensRights27/12/23 05:55 AM
-7

Dude, how many men die from childbirth? It's their's. Move on.
/r/MensRights24/12/23 02:34 AM
14

Florida has great laws about disclosure. This shit happens elsewhere, but there's no duty to make the info publicly available.
/r/MensRights20/12/23 05:12 AM
-9

Bahahaha. This post is the most successful marketing their company has had on their channel! Well done on hitting your view count and getting your nut. Props for choosing man eater style.songs and having a black woman's hands in the video. Much more impact than the gloves.
/r/MensRights12/12/23 09:09 AM
1

That's not a scientific study. It's an article about a few studies by the same author. Scientific studies have methods, results, statistics and discussion so that someone can run it again and replicate it. I can't tell how these studies were sampled, what the measurements were, where it fits into the rest of the literature. Psychology today is like the Philip DiFranco show. Sure there's interesting content, but you don't wave it around as proving anything. At this point I haven't made any argume…
/r/MensRights05/12/23 08:53 PM
0

It's statistics bud. I don't base my world view on social media.
/r/MensRights05/12/23 12:10 PM
0

It's a small scale convenience sample and who knows how selective they were with what they included. It's explanatory power is zerooooooo. And across four years it's pulled the same number of views as a mid scale politics streamer can in 24 hours. It's irrelevant.
/r/MensRights05/12/23 12:41 AM
-8

4 year old video with 160k views. No one cares about this shit.
/r/MensRights04/12/23 01:56 PM
10

It doesn't really matter. Consent can be withdrawn at any time by either party.
/r/MensRights01/12/23 04:01 PM
3

This thread is highly regarded. Super heroes have dominated movies and TV for decades and the guys in those get jacked. Reynolds and Jackman are in Deadpool 3. Want to say either of them aren't manly or not A listers? Haven't seen a bunch of boomers and gen x abusing GHB in a while? There's the Hemsworths, Jason Mamoa, John fucking Cena, Dave Bautista. Dwayne Johnson regularly tops highest paid star lists. Denzel Washington is going to be in the next Gladiator. He isn't busting his ass all the t…
/r/MensRights28/11/23 10:22 PM
-3

Just live my life. I'm not concerned with being identified as a feminist or ally. If a woman is walking toward me at night and crosses the road, I don't take that personally. If we are walking in the same direction and I'm overtaking them and there is limited space for me to do that I'll slow down and wait for more room.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/11/23 03:31 PM
-9

The ones doing rhe bombing a century ago weren't technically people. They were property. You can't blame them.
/r/MensRights17/11/23 10:56 PM
1

I avoided those spots when my kids were young. The few steps it saves isn't worth how busy the lane way is. I'd rather walk further than worry about running over people or vehicles coming by.
/r/MensRights14/11/23 06:19 PM
0

Yeah sorry I got confused on which thread I was replying to. There was someone else claiming that high body count for women lead to divorce but not for men and I was asking them to support that.l claim.
/r/MensRights09/11/23 09:49 PM
0

Someone else I asked for a source supplied one but their source wasn't able to show that gender had an effect on divorce rates.
/r/MensRights09/11/23 07:47 PM
2

I read the study you linked, the results don't support the idea that there are gender differences in divorce rates. I've quoted it below. That's why I was asking if you had a source that does show a difference. Finally, to test for differences in the effect of premarital sex on divorce between men and women, we repeat all analyses from Tables 3 and 4 and include an interaction between gender and premarital sex variables (not shown). The results are straightforward: we do not any evidence of sex …
/r/MensRights09/11/23 07:42 PM
2

You want to up the chance of success then date longer. Mind showing your source on sex differences having a differential effect on divorce rates based on number of partners?
/r/MensRights09/11/23 07:08 PM
0

So much of it seems like an excuse to bitch about women.
/r/MensRights09/11/23 06:42 PM
1

Hell yeah brother.
/r/MensRights09/11/23 03:26 PM
-8

Did you mean to say that the issues guys have dating are that women are broken and guys chose wrong, and the issue girls have dating is that she's broken instead of all of the men?
/r/MensRights09/11/23 11:31 AM
-12

These comments are coming out of the manosphere with all of its dumb broscience. Concepts like the wall, cock carousel (or back blown out) and the hate on alt styles are redpill/incel concepts. Even the thread title is huge bait as it's the same as one of their subs.
/r/MensRights09/11/23 11:22 AM
2

The licensing organizations often have trade mags with sections on disciplinary cases. Most of the sex cases involve male teachers despite their far fewer numbers. What gets picked up by media is what draws eyeballs.
/r/MensRights04/11/23 02:43 AM
1

Are coping strategies and behavioral interventions treatment or not?
/r/MensRights26/10/23 09:06 PM
2

Mental health is health. There are treatments. It's not curable but the symptoms can be treated and mitigated through psychotherapy.
/r/MensRights26/10/23 05:27 PM
3

Psychological therapies aren't medical now?
/r/MensRights26/10/23 05:26 PM
10

The right to medical care.
/r/MensRights26/10/23 01:43 PM
4

How can she slap? HOW CAN SHE SLAP?
/r/MensRights18/10/23 05:32 PM
11

A lot of what is argued as right or moral in the conventional wisdom is determined by those with power. For example: In an economic downturn companies must get money in order to keep from shutting down. But individuals must not get money because it makes them lazy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/10/23 02:35 PM
0

For every marriage eh? 🤣 Trump's had three, you telling me there was trust in any of them? Extend your reasoning, if you can't trust your partner, should you get married to them? If you can't trust any partner, should you get married to anyone? That's not me telling you what to do, it's a key question before you sign a legal contract. What broke marriage? Changing of laws that made one party no longer the property of the other? Or that were punitive? Because one person can't be imprisoned, stone…
/r/MensRights16/10/23 07:12 PM
1

So don't get married. If you can't trust someone, don't sign the contract.
/r/MensRights16/10/23 12:51 PM
1

I've been married for 14 years. Still monogamous. No law forcing it.
/r/MensRights16/10/23 12:11 AM
7

If someone needs a law to keep from cheating they shouldn't be married. 😜
/r/MensRights16/10/23 12:09 AM
73

Their population is pretty small, so going to conscript everyone at a certain age.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/10/23 02:26 PM
1

I am absolutely generalizing, based on my knowledge that republican judges are chosen by the federalist society for ideological reasons rather than jurisprudence. The appeals court in this case wasn't 1 or 2 judges, it was closer to 10. ETA: generalizations aren't wrong, they are common and necessary. That's how science works. The issues come from hasty generalizations where the sample doesn't represent or can't be known to represent most cases from a lack of power.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/09/23 01:55 PM
1

Yeah but we are talking about thousands of appointed judges who don't have limited terms. Or 9 judges who seem to be able to check two other branches of government without any meaningful checks on them. If you want a competent judiciary it's not coming through a republican controlled senate.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/09/23 01:31 PM
3

It should also be pointed out that Khan's initial suit was dismissed by a Trump appointee and the appeals court that found a need for due process was all Democratic appointees. Dem judges good?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/09/23 01:24 PM
2

It's true that some thought that. The idea persisted through European history and gives us the origin of dildos and sex machines. Although apparently they also had lots of sex with bread in the ancient world. Men and women. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wandering_womb Pre-electric vibrator https://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/4755 A more appropriate response might be to ask why if she's aware of historical sexism, she's perpetuating it today in reverse?
/r/EverydayMisandry19/09/23 09:37 PM
1

The uterus running around the body was believed to be the cause of hysteria in Ancient Greece. An appropriate comeback based on the reference would be asking if she has any ideas for treatment. Historically hysteria was treated with pungent oils on the vulva, fumigation, or manual stimulation. Basically ask if her she's offering to jerk you off to treat it.
/r/EverydayMisandry19/09/23 08:52 PM
1

Yes. It was just training data. I think OP is getting a bit overworked over it. They state the data is skewed, and was probably chosen to demonstrate this feature on purpose.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/08/23 10:49 PM
0

The oppressor-oppressed dichotomy isn't specific to intersectionality. It's a dialectic analysis from Marx For an intersectional study there's Increasing Disparities in Mortality by Socioeconomic Status Annu. Rev. Public Health 2018.39:237-251. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org Access provided by 199.71.54.131 on 08/22/23. See copyright for approved use. Barry Bosworth. "BuT tHiS iSn'T iNtErSeCtIoNaL!" Sure it is. Differences in race, sex and wealth are noted to have different health outcome…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/08/23 10:35 PM
4

That's like, just your opinion man.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/08/23 04:02 PM
4

You're putting normative values on it. I'm just describing policy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/08/23 02:37 PM
6

Cons don't appeal to family values. They choose one particular model of the family and demand everyone conform to it. I'm open to people choosing their own relationships and how they carry them out within reason. Lower taxes are great for people with enough income to not worry much about basic necessities. You can still coast on communal provided services like infrastructure and the benefits of standards imposed by regulation. When it comes.to paying for those goods and services you benefit from…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/08/23 01:29 PM
2

It's the same playbook everywhere for conservatives. Pick a group that is different and spread hate of them to drive votes.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/08/23 12:40 PM
8

Live and let live as the Republican party campaigns on hatred of marginalized groups for decades.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/08/23 12:15 PM
16

The monarch has to follow parliament's lead. They don't make policy decisions on their own.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/07/23 11:48 PM
-17

I don't think it's that biased. With every cinamtic shot being thought about, chosen and then produced It's a valid critique of film and video game making. There was a scene in Mass Effect 2 where the protagonist is talking with a character called Miranda, but the camera was positioned behind and below, showing her ass. In legendary edition they moved the camera a bit higher. https://youtu.be/RS4GtlQMuXA What was the message from that camera placement and how it relates to the dialogue? What is …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/07/23 12:09 PM
3

If it wasn't John and Lorena Bobbit, who was it?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/07/23 08:16 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter