TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

KamehamehaWave Archive

View 1 post and 27 comments by KamehamehaWave on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

KamehamehaWave/r/MensRights30/06/12 09:57 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Which of the half dozen forms of easily available BC are you referring to? All hormonal birth control. They all have side effects which vary from person to person. What are we even arguing about here? That women who take plan b are irresponsible? At the stage where you're given that choice, that is very much the responsible option, no matter how you got there. And I want that option to be as easy as possible for everyone to take. That's all I have to say on the matter, have a good day.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 01:38 AM
1

You speak as if there are no legitimate reasons for avoiding birth control. Are you not aware of its side-effects? I know many women who have had to spend some real effort into finding a method that works for them. I too could not find any evidence either way as to Plan B's most common use, but myself and my girlfriend-at-the-time were asked whether we had used protection or not when we got the pill. If the NHS has made the result of this polling public (which I think they would have to if asked…
/r/MensRights03/01/13 01:27 AM
1

lol what? Very patronising, very rude. I'm suggesting that its primary use is in the case of birth control failure, and would continue to be were it free in your area as it is in mine. If you have any evidence otherwise, please do correct me, rather than merely asserting that you are right and I am wrong.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 01:05 AM
1

At the point where you're buying the morning after pill, you're no longer in a position to make that choice. The only time I've had to use the morning after pill was when my condom broke, and I was with a girl who didn't like birth control. I would have paid for Plan B if I had to, but I'm glad the British NHS provides it for free, so that people who don't have much money don't have to make that choice.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 12:46 AM
2

What a lazy, unhelpful response. How about linking to the circumcision-related links in the FAQ? http://menshealth.about.com/od/genitalsexualissues/a/circum_comp.htm http://www.circumstitions.com/Complic.html
/r/MensRights06/08/12 10:37 PM
0

Did you read it? "but derpette! you're drunk! and i'm not--" "hush brad, just let me take care of you." He didn't finish his sentence, and he made no attempt to do so. Is this the problem? Did nobody else actually read the comic?
/r/MensRights01/07/12 11:10 AM
1

So many people get up in arms when the word "rape" is used in a way they don't find appropriate, and I wanted to know what they would prefer. There is also the fact that it is important not to accuse someone of violent rape when they have committed a lesser crime, a misunderstanding which is all too easy now.
/r/MensRights01/07/12 11:06 AM
3

Saying "feminists just want to play the victim" doesn't solve the problem. If there is no other word to describe these things, then they are right to call them rape.
/r/MensRights30/06/12 10:28 PM
-4

He remained silent even though he knew she thought he was someone else. That is lying by omission. It is entirely obvious what he should have done, and it is entirely obvious that what he did instead was highly immoral.
/r/MensRights30/06/12 09:42 PM
-4

He didn't tell her. He could have easily finished his sentence, but he did not.
/r/MensRights30/06/12 09:40 PM
10

Lying to someone so they'll have sex with you is a scumbag move. It's not the same as rape, but are we actually going to be apologists right now? Nobody's saying he should be arrested.
/r/MensRights30/06/12 05:48 PM
5

I don't mind being harassed when I wear what I want, so nobody else should either!
/r/MensRights24/05/12 10:56 PM
1

It could certainly be argued that there are good reasons for armies to be male-dominated, and male-dominated armies are certainly not intrinsically linked with male-dominated societies. I would also like to note that if there had ever been a call from men to include women in conscription, then maybe they would have been. Nor can you honestly say for sure that this wasn't by their choice. I can say that they chose to fight it in the end. It's impossible to truly quantify which gender has it worse…
/r/MensRights21/05/12 02:56 PM
0

'Men oppress women.' Please take a moment to think about what that phrase means. I have already conceded that you seem to have a stricter definition of oppress than I do. I maintain that it is true that men had power and denied it to women. This does not mean I think that they hated women or were "sociopaths". Indeed, as you say, many likely never questioned the gender roles they enforced. Here's another thing that I disagree with. I believe a situation can be dysfunctional and damaging to both …
/r/MensRights21/05/12 01:35 AM
0

No, it's because men in power wanted to hurt women. I have never suggested this. I have denied the accusation multiple times. As would anyone with any sense. Your previous sentence provides a much more likely motivation, but motivation isn't what matters, and you are the only one who has mentioned it. The situation is the same, regardless of the motivations which got us there, and it is a situation of inequality. If feminism is about putting blame on men, then you're talking to the wrong feminis…
/r/MensRights21/05/12 01:17 AM
-2

I'm not "proposing" anything. I'm stating historical facts. Women being denied the opportunity to vote even while they fought for it is oppression. If that's not oppression by your definition then substitute whatever word you feel is more appropriate. The point stands that women have certainly been disadvantaged in the past, and acknowledging that does not constitute an attack on males. Indeed, denying it is pure ignorance.
/r/MensRights21/05/12 12:39 AM
1

*He, actually. EDIT: Also, it is ridiculous that this dumb joke is higher up than my reasoned response. Don't downvote just because you disagree, redditors.
/r/MensRights21/05/12 12:28 AM
-1

Your ability to read far more than has been written continues to colour your arguments. No, when I say that men have oppressed women, I do not mean that they maliciously set out to control them. It is a categorical truth that women played the role of inferior to men in politics and production in the 19th to early 20th-century West. You are correct that it is not self-evident, but there is undeniable evidence. The very fact that there had to be a fight for woman's suffrage shows that women were n…
/r/MensRights20/05/12 10:31 PM
-1

Pro-choice rhetoric overwhelmingly does, even if you can pick out individual writings that aren't overtly referencing this narrative. I'm not cherry-picking. The article I posted was the first pro-choice result from a google search. On the other hand, your views on what feminism is are presumably influenced by /r/MensRights, where only the clearly foolish and radical examples of feminism will tend to be posted and reach the frontpage. Your claim to know what the majority of feminists feel is aki…
/r/MensRights20/05/12 07:53 PM
1

What's the point in making up this scenario, then assuming what your opponents' response would be, and criticising them for that? I have never argued that terminating parental rights is not part of the reason for abortion. For the sake of argument, I am willing to concede that that is the only reason anyone wants to abort, even though that's blatantly false. The fact remains, that it is the woman who has to decide whether or not to bring a conceived child to birth. It is obviously immoral for an…
/r/MensRights20/05/12 07:04 PM
0

> Results indicated that, in general, [homosexual males] and [heterosexual females] showed greater actual concerns with appearance, weight, and dieting, and were perceived to possess greater body image disturbance and dieting concerns compared to [heterosexual males] and [homosexual females]. Straight women do have more body issues than straight men. This picture was a joke, based on an observation which is, in general, true. So any outrage is a little silly.
/r/MensRights20/05/12 12:25 PM
1

'men have reproductive rights and are denying them to women.' You are the only one who has mentioned men's reproductive rights. Or indeed, the right of anyone to abdicate responsibility for a child who is born. Men will never have to go through a pregnancy that they don't want to. Abortion is a purely feminist issue in that it only concerns the rights of women. You believe that pro-choice advocates would be okay with a scenario in which the woman does not have to gestate but does have to take on…
/r/MensRights20/05/12 12:06 PM
1

bad men are trying to take away women's reproductive rights I've seen this line of reasoning before, that calling for more rights for women means blaming men for a lack of them. The writer explicitly mentions a woman who is pushing against reproductive rights. You are the one who's making it a gender issue. Is that a scenario pro-choice advocates would advocate for? I don't see why not. And in any case, even if abortion were purely about abdicating parental responsibility (which it obviously isn…
/r/MensRights18/05/12 08:22 AM
0

The idea that men somehow have vastly greater reproductive rights then women and are actively trying to repress women's reproductive rights is implied by the phrase. No it's not. A woman's right to abort a pregnancy and a man's right to choose not to be a father are two separate issues. They're also not mutually exclusive, so campaigning for abortion rights isn't anti-man. Are you seriously going to argue that the article I linked is comparable to the OP article? That's a ridiculous stance to ta…
/r/MensRights17/05/12 07:47 PM
-4

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/mar/25/abortion-law-case-for-change Another Guardian editorial. A little piece about a woman's right to choose. No mention of men at all, just a desire for women to be respected by the law as autonomous beings.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 07:24 PM
-2

Maybe 95% that you see on /r/MensRights. I think you've got your numbers backwards.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 06:49 PM
3

This is link-baiting nonsense. Don't waste your time with it, and don't generalise this woman's gibbering to all of feminism.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 02:46 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter