TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Kanonizator Archive

View 2 posts and 398 comments by Kanonizator on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

actual racism You mean like black people hating whites openly, advocating for violence against whites and such? Nah, those subs are fine.
/r/MensRights29/06/20 08:22 AM
5

...and the picture shows her as if she was the victim. The poor, poor woman everyone is sympathetic towards.
/r/MensRights19/06/20 09:03 AM
1

I don't have the data in front of me, but I remember seeing that even within violent criminals, even within armed confrontations, the police are 10-20x more likely to kill a man than a woman. That's partially because most violent crimes are committed by men, plus men are hardwired by evolution to see other men as a threat while seeing women as something to protect. (So much for the demented feminist conspiracy theory that men band together in a brotherhood to oppress women... FFS...) Even crimin…
/r/MensRights08/06/20 07:37 AM
0

We need people like you, but I'm afraid it's too late to solve things peacefully. Practically the entire west is a powder keg now and it seems the fuse is already lit. We've been divided long enough, now it's time for the conquer phase...
/r/MensRights05/06/20 07:29 AM
-1

Schools teaching evolution is not persecution, of course. Forcing christian parents' children to attend drag queen shows and muslim prayers is persecution though. Suing a christian baker again and again because he refuses to write custom gay/trans/whatever messages on his cakes is persecution. A political movement promoting 'art' like Christ in a jar of piss (while the same movement treats offending muslims as a cardinal sin) is persecution. Poor you. You've swapped one kind of brainwashing for …
/r/MensRights05/06/20 07:27 AM
2

Per-capita, black men commit more than 2x more violent crime than white men, so considering they're interacting more with police by default, it's absolutely self-evident why they suffer more police brutality per capita, and it's NOT because whites are racists or any other inane bullshit, like 'systemic oppression' or whatnot. Blacks interact with police more because they commit more crime and since they resist arrests more than people of other races they practically force the police to treat the…
/r/MensRights05/06/20 07:09 AM
2

If you have an ounce of sense you try to avoid a situation like that as wives divorce stay at home dads in even greater proportions than working dads. Yeah, NAWALT and all that, but still.
/r/MensRights04/06/20 10:56 AM
3

BLM was a scam to begin with as blacks are not disproportionately targeted with police violence. The police is not racist, systemic or institutional racism doesn't exist. The entire setup is a carbon copy of feminism's demented claims about how women are oppressed by men, applied to blacks&whites obviously. BLM was built on a false premise and it was hardly more than a hate movement from the get-go, for all intents and purposes it's just a manifestation of black people's racial hatred against wh…
/r/MensRights04/06/20 10:49 AM
6

What do you expect will happen when you brainwash entire generations of children with insane nonsense about how whites are all evil racists who keep black people down simply because they hate them? This is the end result of decades of progressive propaganda in the education system and in the media.
/r/MensRights04/06/20 10:39 AM
2

Oh, but whites want to be murdered by cops, right? What a fuckin' moron. And no, police violence against blacks is not disproportionate if you take into consideration that blacks commit more violent crimes per capita, in fact if you take crime stats as a basis police brutality disproportionately affects whites.
/r/MensRights04/06/20 10:36 AM
1

but it will pass in time Good luck waiting for racial tensions to calm in a setting where PoC are literally conditioned to hate whites much the same way women are conditioned to hate men through feminist nonsense. This won't go away peacefully, especially with the ramping up of mass third world migration and the widespread political and social promotion of islam in the west.
/r/MensRights04/06/20 10:33 AM
2

The other day I was walking by a group of black people and they said behind my back that I looked like a Nazi.The other day I was walking by a group of black people and they said behind my back that I looked like a Nazi. Welcome to living in a progressive utopia where 'minorities' are raised from their early childhood to hate their 'oppressors', namely you. In the US entire generations of blacks have been raised being told 24/7 that all their problems come from evil whites and that they would li…
/r/MensRights04/06/20 10:26 AM
2

Offtopic here, but talking about "fake christian persecution" in an age when they're obviously under attack on multiple fronts is a bit weird, to put it mildly. Progressives have been attacking and harassing them for decades now, forcefully pushing their own ideology on christians sometimes purely out of spite. Progressives designated islam as a group protected by political correctness partially because it fucks with christianity, and they routinely side with islam against christianity every sin…
/r/MensRights04/06/20 09:59 AM
1

This insanity doesn't cancel out another wrong as women were never systematically oppressed. The BLM hashtag is appropriate in that all progressive bullshit comes from the same insane roots, BLM is a racial scam in the same way feminism is a gender scam.
/r/MensRights04/06/20 09:46 AM
1

growing up I saw crimes committed equally regardless of gender Personal anecdotes are fine to a point but we're way past that point here. Women commit petty theft and some other things at similar rates to men but you don't see women do stabbings, drive-by shootings, gang violence and so on. Most violent crime is indeed committed by men. Sometimes statistics are true and personal anecdotes are, well, misunderstood.
/r/MensRights25/05/20 07:36 AM
31

In the original sense of the word a "patriarch" means the male head of a family and "patriarchy" was a system where patriarchs had legit power over their families. It was demolished ages ago, today women obviously have more power in the family than men. This is a perfect example of how feminists manipulate definitions and progressives in politics, in the education system and in the media push feminists' manipulated narratives to become mainstream, to become 'common knowledge'. What you wrote is …
/r/MensRights25/05/20 07:27 AM
3

It's pretty hard to organize a decent debate about MR as it's very damn near impossible to find a single person arguing the other side who knows anything about the facts of the issue, can remain calm and focused, and doesn't resort to lies or emotional bullshit. Pretty much all feminists know that they can win any such debate immediately just by using the woman card so why wouldn't they do that? I've been debating about MR/feminism for close to two decades now and I can count all the debates tha…
/r/MensRights28/04/20 10:44 AM
17

For hiring discrimination, it's actually the law in Austria that if a man and woman both apply for a job, the job must go to a woman. So it takes a REALLY long time for men to start working. Women can pretty much start working right at age 18. How to destroy a society, step 1...
/r/MensRights06/04/20 11:41 AM
0

You don't seem to realize that there's a huge difference between the right being traditionalists and thus wanting to preserve traditional gender roles, and progressives announcing an all-out fucking gender war where men are the enemy they want to destroy. Comparing the two is basically insane.
/r/MensRights23/03/20 11:12 AM
2

Identity politics is a core tenet of progressivism. You're not mistaken when you say progressivism has taken over the entire left lately, but saying this solves nothing. The modern progressive left is unquestionably an enemy of western civilization and as long as they're in power pining for some other kind of leftism is meaningless daydreaming. If you're anything but a rabid SJW your best option is to fight against progressivism with all you have, and if it ever crosses your mind to vote for the…
/r/MensRights23/03/20 11:09 AM
3

It's totally different though, the right's gynocentrism means it stands by traditional gender roles that have worked for thousands of years and provide some benefit to men as well (even though they obviously provide more benefit to women), while the left has started an all-out gender war with men as their enemy they want to destroy. You might say that the right isn't perfect but it's irrefutably lightyears better than the left.
/r/MensRights23/03/20 11:00 AM
1

For at least half a dozen loosely related reasons, most of which are based in human psychology. It starts with how we men are by our very nature more independent and individualistic while women are more like herd creatures, who find safety and comfort in numbers, and this herd mentality is a core tenet of leftism. Modern leftism, ie. progressivism is also harshly anti-western and they attack western culture through undermining the demographic that created and maintains western culture, ie. white…
/r/MensRights23/03/20 10:28 AM
1

You're welcome. As far as I'm concerned it should be mandatory reading for all aspiring MRAs and MGTOWs...
/r/MensRights13/03/20 12:36 PM
1

I was only talking about the negative perceptions some people have of these groups, and these are all subjective. I consider myself to belong to all 3 groups and it's totally fine, all of them are valid answers to the same problem in their own ways, and they're not mutually exclusive. I don't think anyone's actually a loser just because they belong to these groups. For me it's, well, kind of obvious that the best solution for any given man in this world is to learn how to handle women (the TRP w…
/r/MensRights11/03/20 09:07 AM
2

The root of the MGTOW idea was the observation that MRAs don't/can't create strong groups like feminists because men are not herd creatures, all the active MRAs back then were "armies of one", hence the expression "going their own way". Regardless, since then MGTOW was turned into the polar opposite of what the MRM is, MGTOWs don't want to fight for men's rights at all, they instead opt out of the rigged game altogether. In this sense, the groups have nothing to do with each other, their ideolog…
/r/MensRights11/03/20 08:52 AM
1

As long as you don't try to turn observations into rules, fine. It would be a mockery of the core idea behind MGTOW to turn it into a ruleset men have to follow in order to be recognized as 'going their own way'. I have been considering myself a MGTOW longer than most people have known the term and I'm still living in the same LTR I was back then. On my terms, of course :)
/r/MensRights11/03/20 08:46 AM
10

MGTOW has nothing to do with incels the very same way they have nothing to do with the MRM. Stop trying to throw other men under the bus to look better comparatively.
/r/MensRights10/03/20 12:47 PM
6

MGTOW is a completely different movement (if you can call it a movement at all) than Men's Rights, they have nothing to do with each other. The Red Pill is a third movement that has nothing to do with the former two. Some people in these movements take it as an insult if they're described as belonging to either of the others as every one of them sees that the game is rigged but MRAs (who want to un-rig the game) are seen by the other two groups as losers who fight for something they can never at…
/r/MensRights10/03/20 12:46 PM
17

MGTOW and TRP have literally nothing to do with the Men's Rights Movement.
/r/MensRights10/03/20 12:30 PM
20

MGTOW, TRP and Men's Rights have nothing to do with each other, bashing MGTOWs for not being 'proper' MRAs is silly.
/r/MensRights10/03/20 12:29 PM
1

Modern political progressivism is a scam, plain and simple.
/r/MensRights05/02/20 10:01 AM
1

Please stop confusing/conflating the dictionary definition of "progress" with the political movement that calls itself "progressive", it would be amazingly childish to think that the political movement must surely fit the dictionary definition of the word because it's the same word. By this logic the nazis were socialists and North Korea is a democracy, you get it. As for why I think the modern progressive political movement is bad, well, let's just look at the results of their actions. Eight ye…
/r/MensRights05/02/20 09:53 AM
2

It's a scam designed to make you accept being harassed, dismissed and exploited without resisting, plain and simple. Never give in.
/r/MensRights04/02/20 02:29 PM
1

The problem we have is that there's a female supremacist hate movement attacking us and destroying society in the process, and that won't be solved by us copying it for our own use. What we need is not another demented movement that can only cause further division in our world, but the existing hate movements to cease to exist.
/r/MensRights04/02/20 02:27 PM
1

But I never, ever see the reverse. If you go to women's and feminists communities online; I never see any kind of envy. Yeah, their tyrades about how men have it so good are all just pretense they use to bash us with. Most of them would never switch places with us because they know their propaganda is pure bullshit. This is practically an objective fact as a lot more transsexuals are male to female than vice versa.
/r/MensRights04/02/20 02:23 PM
1

It's one of the best subs at the moment and it's far from being a progressive circlejerk like the most of the rest of reddit, not to mention the insane idea of it being a "fascist state". Come on. I post tons of controversial comments there, many in defense of men or attacking feminism in some form, and I was never banned or shadowbanned for it. (I was suspended for using strong language but that was justified from the mods' standpoint.)
/r/MensRights04/02/20 02:18 PM
1

As far as I see half of his argument is just rephrasing mine, ie. it's that political/social issues shouldn't affect your personal life. The other half of his argument is flawed though, you can't overlook problems saying there's also sunshine in life. As long as men are imprisoned or ruined for bullshit genderpoltical reasons we must fight against this, we can't let it go saying "well, not everything is bad, so let's just look at the bright side of life". That's for your personal life, but when …
/r/MensRights22/01/20 11:32 AM
3

Oh, 6 reasons, that's cool, too bad they all boil down to the single stat that HPV is considered a risk factor in cancers that affect about .01% of the population (35K people in a country of 300M, and before you argue that it's per year, sure, but the 300M is also a different 300M from year to year). Maybe you should re-read what you've linked using a bit of critical thinking? So, thanks, I'll rather take my chances with that .01% probability of getting a rare cancer than vaccinating myself with…
/r/MensRights21/01/20 02:35 PM
9

It's not rocket science that if you feminize men women will find them less attractive, only idiots refuse to acknowledge this, and it's sad that this obvious truth has to be packaged in satire because otherwise social terrorists would shut it down immediately.
/r/MensRights21/01/20 01:40 PM
6

That's a reasonable point to an extent but sadly enough we live in a world where men get arrested for 'manspreading', so we don't need to make up catastrophies, we live in a slow motion catastrophy already. You mustn't let it get to your personal life, but to ignore it would allow the idiots to play with the world freely.
/r/MensRights21/01/20 01:36 PM
6

You have to learn to separate the political/social and the private spheres of your life. Learn to discuss social issues without it affecting your personal life. Rule nr.1 for any kind of activism if you want to have a happy life. As for answering your question, it started as men being disposable because evolution made us so, and on that basis a large social structure was built to create social division and confusion and hatred (it's called feminism), and the powers that be profit from it, so the…
/r/MensRights21/01/20 01:28 PM
2

For american men who don't understand the importance of culture this might be a good thing, more competition for good men would raise their status and bargaining power in the dating market. From the viewpoint of migrant men it's blatant discrimination of course, so it boils down to who you think are more important, migrants or citizens...
/r/MensRights21/01/20 01:25 PM
0

Problem is feminists can't even comprehend the notion that they should or could respect men, for them this thought is so alien their brains can't process it. Of course their only answer is "LOLOLOLOLOL", anything else would require presenting some kind of argument, and that's out of the question. And I'm not saying this just to be a smartass, it's obviously true, and I'm even sad about it because this is another piece of proof that most feminists can't be reasoned with, their belief in feminist …
/r/MensRights21/01/20 01:19 PM
0

Nobody makes this argument wrt rape, it's clearly a projection from women who use hormones as an excuse for their behavior.
/r/MensRights21/01/20 01:05 PM
1

For fuck's sake, the struggle for equality shouldn't make people stupid. HPV vaccines are not something we need, women don't need it either, but men even less, so just because Big Pharma successfully lobbied western governments to make the taxpayers pay for it for women, a man would be an idiot to fight to get it himself. HPV itself is not even a serious disease, it's just an assumed risk factor for some types of rare cancers, and it has many strains the vaccination doesn't protect you from. In …
/r/MensRights21/01/20 01:02 PM
11

You mean people just do it for fun then? Of freakin' course some religions mandate circumcision. Or you can refuse to do it, that just means you've abandoned the religion so you get kicked out of the community, or worse.
/r/MensRights10/01/20 11:35 AM
22

Sadly it's pretty much a given that orthodox jews will slander the intactivist movement, they can't do much else to try to protect their outdated religious practices. Of course they say respecting boys bodily autonomy is fascism. How they mix misogyny into this picture is a mystery though.
/r/MensRights10/01/20 11:31 AM
2

Who said anything about oppression? Why did you bring that up?
/r/MensRights08/01/20 09:42 AM
4

Absolutely. They're more brave and more open with it, they in fact have built an entire industry on it that only now seems to begin to falter. (Think Disney Star Wars.)
/r/MensRights07/01/20 12:41 PM
0

having a closer circle of friends and stronger friendships This one's not true though. Most female friendships are legandarily shallow, and they sometimes stab each other in the back at the drop of a hat. The other stuff you listed are fine.
/r/MensRights07/01/20 12:38 PM
1

Diversity is our strength...
/r/MensRights07/01/20 12:33 PM
2

Statistically speaking queens have started more wars than kings in European history. The idea that women in power are pacifists is a laughable feminist myth.
/r/MensRights07/01/20 12:23 PM
7

Actions speak louder than words. The question is silly anyways as it assumes that reading a feminist book means you automatically agree with it and convert to feminism, as if you couldn't read a book and find faults in it. Feminists assume that not agreeing with them can only come from ignorance, which is an arrogant stance to say the least.
/r/MensRights16/12/19 09:56 AM
1

We live in clown world. The west is occupied by an insane political movement that doesn't play by the old rules, they lie and deceive and fuck over anyone in the harshest ways possible if it gets them closer to total power. Sadly enough they control pretty much almost everything already, most of the media, politics (think deep state), culture, entertainment, education, the internet, etc. We're not getting out of this mess without a catastrophy that will rival the world wars, or it will be the th…
/r/MensRights12/12/19 01:53 PM
2

For sexually transmitted infections just to mention MGM is ludicrous as nobody should have unprotected sex with people who have STDs. Let's just think about this stuff using generic numbers here: if your chance of contracting HIV or whatever while having unprotected sex with an infected person is 50%, but if you're circumcized it's "only" 45%, does it actually protect you? Heck no. It might provide idiots with a false sense of security though, actually increasing their chances of getting infecte…
/r/MensRights12/12/19 01:31 PM
3

Women were never oppressed in the west, it's just a feminist narrative they were able to brainwash kids with at school so by now the masses just accept it without questioning it. If you actually look at how things were set up in the past in western societies it looks a lot more like men being the slaves of women than vice versa. Men did every task that was hard, unhealthy or dangerous while women were left with the easiest and safest stuff, and this was systematically upheld all throughout weste…
/r/MensRights20/11/19 01:59 PM
2

The first and foremost fundational problem with feminism is that it treats men as a group, which we are not. Just because you and I both have dicks it doesn't mean we share anything, power, wealth, experiences, views, nothing. Feminists talking about "men this" and "men that" is a flawed concept to begin with because men are not a group and we never were. Everything else they have stems from this, for example that feminists view men and women as competing groups in a zero sum game. It's all stup…
/r/MensRights20/11/19 01:46 PM
3

It's still insane though that he was imprisoned on false rape charges that looked laughable to begin with. He fucked two women who were perfectly okay with having sex with him until they met each other and realized he fucked 'em both and then suddenly they "realized" he raped them. Come on... His life was ruined based on this bullshit. The 3-letter organizations didn't even have to suicide him, he was holed up in the embassy for years and now he's in prison.
/r/MensRights20/11/19 01:30 PM
18

Sure, that's why all male sports records are getting broken by biological women posing as 'trans' athletes.
/r/MensRights14/11/19 02:45 PM
2

In a weird way it probably helped innocent men avoid going to trial for false cases.
/r/MensRights14/11/19 02:14 PM
10

People like this should be hounded out of civilized society. This hatemongering needs to stop.
/r/MensRights13/11/19 02:21 PM
1

Nobody said women have a monopoly on anything, stop being a jackass. Trying to redefine masculinity and femininity doesn't work though, these things are encoded in our instincts, in our subconscious minds. Being overly emotional, especially in public is distinctly feminine.
/r/MensRights11/11/19 08:18 AM
1

So women have a monopoly on emotions? Since nobody said that I must assume you're arguing against your own strawman. Good luck.
/r/MensRights11/11/19 08:14 AM
84

Eh, this is just a subtler attempt at the very same social engineering Gillette did way too bluntly. What we need is not to celebrate femininity in men "in a positive way", what we need is social engineers to leave us the f_ck alone. Being feminine never served men's interests and it still doesn't, so attempts at popularizing it are misguided to say the least. The ad is also pretty condescending in it's portrayal of many of its male characters, and the idea behind all of it, namely that traditio…
/r/MensRights08/11/19 02:45 PM
2

Don't. That wouldn't serve your interests at all. Hate those who push the ideology that brings out and promotes the worst side of female nature. Also, listen to r/grasshopa.
/r/MensRights28/10/19 10:17 AM
1

Educated people are the easiest to fool by progressives because 1. they think they're immune to it which actually makes them more susceptible; 2. they are literally brainwashed in higher education, tons of their teachers are hardcore progressives who promote this insanity.
/r/MensRights28/10/19 09:58 AM
10

Progressives control the culture through both finance, education and political influence, so this is what we get folks: identity politics relentlessly pushed everywhere.
/r/MensRights25/10/19 11:17 AM
3

What are you doing spreading obvious feminist lies in this sub? Read just a couple of paragraphs from books written hundreds of years ago, it will help you disabuse yourself of those idiotic anti-male lies. Here's something you can start with, from Lucrezia Marinella's book "The Nobility and Excellence of Women and the Defects and Vices of Men", written in 1600: In Germany, where men are not permitted any sort of festive attire unless they are noble, every little woman adorns herself with festiv…
/r/MensRights25/10/19 10:28 AM
2

Jesus Christ is this retarded. People achieve things because they have talent and they put in the effort, that's all there is to it. Modern day whiners 'fall short' not because Da Vinci and Francis Bacon had servants or wives but because they're talentless, lazy bums who waste hours each day on social media instead of learning or doing anything useful. One can learn a language or about a scientific field in a couple of months, one just needs CURIOSITY and the internet.
/r/MensRights25/10/19 10:18 AM
1

for some reason the legal profession in the UK, judges, magistrates and the like have all lost their minds while nobody was looking That reason is called feminism, or more broadly progressivism.
/r/MensRights25/10/19 10:05 AM
1

Nah, this shit is everywhere where progressives have a say in how things go. In the entire first world it's probably just a handful of Eastern European countries that are not yet ruined by this shit. Australia, Canada, Sweden, Germany, France, the US... All lost.
/r/MensRights25/10/19 09:58 AM
2

I'd say this is the only proper reaction to a case like this, but, well, it's the current year afterall. Things like this are more and more common every day.
/r/MensRights25/10/19 09:56 AM
5

The fact that she didn't do anything about the, erhm, "incidents" until after she failed at school months later proves that she wasn't scared at all. It's all bullshit.
/r/MensRights25/10/19 09:54 AM
3

MeToo has made men paranoid in virtually any situation involving interaction with women That was the goal. Any and every thing the progressive movement does is deliberate divide and conquer.
/r/MensRights25/10/19 09:50 AM
4

When you get dependant on prescription medicine that shouldn't be called a 'drug addiction' though, in everyday speech that's for, you know, actual drug addicts.
/r/MensRights24/10/19 08:08 AM
9

That was a trap to begin with. Society has always condemned men who have shown any kind of vulnerability, and it still does nowadays, the babble about how 'men should open up' is purely ideological feminist nonsense that doesn't serve the interests of men at all. It would be nice sometimes if we could stop being stoic for a while but we'll always be shamed for it, mostly by women who see that as weakness.
/r/MensRights24/10/19 08:05 AM
5

Not a drug, medicine, ie. 'prescription drug'.
/r/MensRights24/10/19 07:59 AM
1

women kill men in the name of equality How sick it is that we all know what they mean by this concept even though it's patently absurd to the point that it shouldn't even exist?
/r/MensRights16/10/19 12:44 PM
2

Well, we certainly have that, don't we? /s
/r/MensRights25/09/19 11:50 AM
5

What the f_ck is GSMphobia?
/r/MensRights25/09/19 11:31 AM
5

I wonder why americans don't realize that 90% of said police brutality could have been avoided by not resisting or attacking policemen? In Europe most people are cooperative and polite to the police and for some strange reason police brutality is practically non-existent here. Not killing cops would probably also help as they wouldn't be nervous all the time while in public. Regardless, this isn't much of a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights06/08/19 07:54 AM
3

People are blind, they refuse to see and acknowledge what's in front of them, they'd rather come up with or stick to wrong explanations that sound more digestible. The real answer to OP's question is because progressive political activists have taken over almost all aspects of our culture, including the entertainment industry, and they use that golden opportunity to push their demented ideology. That's it. Marvel and Disney are full of insane feminists and other assorted social terrorists and th…
/r/MensRights10/07/19 11:12 AM
1

when we are confident and assertive we are seen as strong leaders etc. but when a female does it she's seen as a bitch Lol no. Men can be seen as creepy or assclowns or bad bosses as well, and the women who complain about being called bossy are not confident and assertive but simply bossy. There are tons of respected female leaders who are actually confident and assertive and nobody has a problem with that. Also, all this is besides the point. How other people (women included!) react to some per…
/r/MensRights08/07/19 10:58 AM
10

It's idiotic to think that if politicians are mostly men then it's men who set social standards. Women always had more social power than men, what society deems acceptable depends mostly on them. Most laws are formal expressions of what women want, this is why the suffragette movement and all female-centric movements was/are so successful. 95% of what feminists demand get made into laws within 10-20 years, which is to be considered instantenous on a historical scale.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 01:00 PM
1

You confuse the dictionary definition of the word 'progressive' with the political group that calls itself progressive, which is the same mistake as confusing the dictionary definition of feminism with actual feminism. The group calling itself progressive sees us as enemies, we're practically nazis as far as they're concerned.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 10:01 AM
5

Progressives call all non-progressive groups bad names and they falsely associate them with each other because that's the easiest way to dismiss them without having to address their arguments or grievances. Yep, that's about it.
/r/MensRights17/06/19 11:51 AM
2

Literally every single female boss at every level has that power and I guess some of them excercise it too. Which is idiotic because they practically never get falsely accused of sexual harassment, so there's no reason for them to avoid being alone with men.
/r/MensRights14/06/19 09:06 AM
7

No. The baseline for humanity is being pro-female, even supposedly anti-female cultures like islam are built on notions of protecting and providing for women, they just do it in ways that seem weird to western folks. Men's rights as a concept is practically unheard of because men don't tend to "unionize" at all, as most of us prioritize the women in our lives and even female strangers above male strangers. Western style progressivism has built a huge social construct on this baseline in the form…
/r/MensRights14/06/19 09:03 AM
1

Why are you surprised by this? Wikipedia is controlled by progressives. It can't be trusted on anything that even just tangentially relates to politics, like global warming or gamergate. They have a very strong progressive bias wherever it's applicable. "Rights" organizations like the ADL and the SPLC are also progressive, no wonder they reference each other.
/r/MensRights14/06/19 08:50 AM
1

There's nothing perverted about looking at women's asses or tits. Our species is a sexually reproducing one, deal with it.
/r/MensRights14/06/19 08:36 AM
4

Problem is, all the 12yo edgelords and the few hundred actual neonazis worldwide look at these free speech platforms as their playgrounds, and fill them with trash instantly. I've already seen some of them on twitter talking about how they will take over JP's new platform in a day. They're literally retarded in that they don't realize how they shoot themselves in the foot by being this dense, they ruin the very things they otherwise could use for actual communication and spreading information th…
/r/MensRights14/06/19 08:21 AM
2

I wish him all the best but I think he doesn't quite grasp the extent of the culture war that's going on, and I fear progressives will crush his platform if it looks dangerous enough to them, just like how they attacked Gab, BitChute, etc. First leftist trolls will fill his platform with false flag nazi propaganda, then point to that and say Thinkspot is a radical far-right shitnest, and based on this the carpet will be pulled from under him. Internet infrastructure providers + banks and payment…
/r/MensRights14/06/19 08:08 AM
2

Men are evolutionally hard-wired to protect and serve women, and feminism just uses this impulse to get what it wants. Tons of young men want to prove they love women and they think the best way to do that is to kiss their asses, and when feminists tell them that men are evil they eagerly want to prove that they're exceptions. 90+% of male feminists believe that other men are all sexist bigots and that it's their job to protect women from these evil misogynists. Up top things are a bit different…
/r/MensRights07/06/19 12:00 PM
6

Mutilating someone for hygiene is absolute barking madness. It's pretty much the same with a small reduction in the chance of getting STDs. If MGM would provide a 100% solid protection against STDs its proponents might have a single sane argument going for it, but it doesn't, so they don't. A guy would be insane to risk HIV having unprotected sex with infected people thinking the lack of a foreskin will protect him. If you have sex with strangers you should always wear a condom so MGM is absolut…
/r/MensRights05/06/19 09:05 AM
4

Progressivism is a hate movement, and what they hope to achieve is to destroy western societies by training useful idiots like her to sow division in society until people actually turn on each other and everything falls apart.
/r/MensRights31/05/19 09:18 AM
6

He never says it explicitly but it's obvious the female was a PoC, so, another fine case of diversity being our strength. From her mentioning the gun and the veteran sticker it's also obvious she's a progressive who hates conservatives.
/r/MensRights31/05/19 09:13 AM
1

We're talking about the deleted scene where she crushes the guy's hand and tells him to give her the keys to the bike.
/r/MensRights31/05/19 08:56 AM
155

Don't try to salvage feminism, it's a hate movement, plain and simple. Women doing good things is not "real feminism", it's women doing good things.
/r/MensRights29/05/19 01:35 PM
1

The mass loss is even worse this way as we're supposed to believe that he shoots all that material out of miniscule capsules... Stark Tech is better than him inventing it.
/r/MensRights29/05/19 01:11 PM
1

I mean, what are the odds that a guy bitten by a radioactive spider is also the inventor of a spidersilk-shooting gizmo? It's too much of a weird coincidence. If his spider-powers made him secrete spider silk, like spiders do, that would be a lot easier to believe.
/r/MensRights29/05/19 01:09 PM
1

Frankly, I find most people's complaints about the movie to be unjustified. Those who complain take the wider context into consideration. If it was just one movie and the creators injected some feminist bullshit into it, nobody would care that much. Problem is, progressives have practically taken over the entertainment industry and everything they touch turns to shit, see Ghostbusters or the Star Wars franchise. Them getting their hands on the MCU is a huge heartache for many because the MCU was…
/r/MensRights29/05/19 01:06 PM
2

The point is not who committed the bigger crime, it's that the terminator was an amoral machine in an action flick where people wanted to see cool fight scenes, and an amoral machine kicking the ass of a couple of bikers was a perfect fit for that movie, it showed us what the terminator is capable of action-wise. In CM a supposed hero throws a hissy-fit about being cat-called and assaults a member of the general public for it. It's idiotic, has nothing to do with the plot, and it's not even an a…
/r/MensRights29/05/19 12:34 PM
2

This is an obvious copy of that scene, it just doesn't work at all because that was an introductory action scene showing the terminator kicking the asses of a couple of tough guys while this is just Captain Grrrlpower getting butthurt as a guy asks her to smile and physically assaulting him for it. No wonder this scene was deleted, it's male-hating feminist garbage, or a feminist power fantasy to be more precise, as it portrays men as catcalling pigs and the heroine condescendingly kicking one's…
/r/MensRights28/05/19 12:16 PM
-1

A side point here, but Spiderman inventing the webslinger was silly as heck, versions of him where it's an organic part of his body make a lot more sense.
/r/MensRights28/05/19 11:25 AM
1

Most of those you mentioned struggle with/because of their powers in some way, that's what makes them interesting characters. Not Captain Woodenface though, she's just perfect in every way and has no problems or hardships. Also there's the other hero type like Batman and Hawkeye who train hard every day and sacrifice important things in their lives to be able to keep up with superpowered beings.
/r/MensRights28/05/19 11:23 AM
4

There's a fresh controversy about the deleted scene where she (a supposed "hero" with super strength) assaults a guy (an average human being) for offering to help her in exchange for a smile. It goes as you'd expect: "Captain Marvel Triggers Fanboys"... Effin' idiots.
/r/MensRights28/05/19 11:14 AM
3

The first 5 words already make it abundantly clear that the post is going to be absolute bullshit. When people talk about male this or male that in this tone it's obvious they know jackshit fuckall about the actual subject and they're just venting their hateful SJW programming they got from the SJW press. Whatever they say it's bound to be the exact opposite of the truth.
/r/MensRights28/05/19 09:46 AM
3

Don't use the word slutty for men, it's degradation of the language pushed by progressives. Slut is a word for a specific kind of women.
/r/MensRights28/05/19 09:40 AM
4

There's no point denying any more that progressives just hate men and male (hetero)sexuality. A guy posting a picture with his GF saying he wants to have sex with her? Burn him at the stake! Child drag queens dancing in gay bars for money is perfectly okay though. No wonder all the sane people say we live in a clown world now.
/r/MensRights28/05/19 09:32 AM
3

Their idea of "equivocating away rape" is us saying that women should be held accountable for their own decisions while drunk, just like men are. Geez, how evil is that, it's dangerously close to actual equality, and only bigots would support that.
/r/MensRights28/05/19 09:10 AM
1

more women vote conservatively and more men vote liberally I think you have bass ackwards, either the stats or the definitions. Women tend to prefer collectivist (community-based) thinking while men are generally more individualist, so it's women who prefer to vote left and men are more right-wingers. Maybe you use the old definition of 'liberal", which is the exact opposite of what it means today. Nowadays liberalism is little more than a code word for progressivism, and they're open enemies of…
/r/MensRights28/05/19 07:43 AM
3

Christianity in its original form taught people to respect fathers, and with the undermining of christianity and all the values it represented the respect for fathers is now also gone. It was a hundred year progressive march through the culture that gradually changed people's perceptions about men and fathers - from protectors and providers we have turned into oppressors and bums/thugs in the public eye, and the change was so slow that people never could point to it and say this change is unheal…
/r/MensRights27/05/19 12:45 PM
2

Sure, but I wasn't talking about tradcucks. You probably can't help admitting that it's always progressives who push for the worst and sickest shit wrt men's rights or men's situation in general, in fact it's clear as daylight that progressives view men as an enemy they must overcome before they can bring about their utopia. The right might do silly things but at least they're not anti-male on principle. It's also pretty transparent by now that progressives identify anything in the world that is…
/r/MensRights27/05/19 10:09 AM
8

I meant a 17yo saying she's 18+.
/r/MensRights26/05/19 10:01 AM
14

Funny thing is if she lies about her age it's also you going to prison. Male privilege both ways.
/r/MensRights26/05/19 07:12 AM
1

Vote for so-called "far-right" parties (which are basically totally legitimate mildly right-wing parties 99% of the time, it's just the overton window has been pushed so far left that anything to the right of Stalin is considered far-right nowadays). I'd love to tell you there's something else you can do but there's not much, and it often comes at great personal cost, like getting ostracized, fired, etc. In fact I'd advise young men against letting their environment know they're antifeminists/MR…
/r/MensRights26/05/19 06:58 AM
6

The bigger picture not too many people talk about: this is cultural marxism at work. Divide society in order to undermine and ultimately destroy it. This is the result of a political elite planning and working for decades on converting higher education into a brainwashing tool that transforms gullible teenagers into social terrorists who can't be pacified or reasoned with. And since practically nobody talks about this people don't know what's going on, they can't handle the situation, much less …
/r/MensRights24/05/19 06:48 AM
1

I'm all for a slow, steady push for accumulating and spreading more knowledge on these issues, that's the proper way to overcome them, but this won't help you or me or our boys, sadly. You have to prepare yourself and your loved ones for a world indifferent to their problems, and I have a feeling things will get even worse in the future as we're actually going backward in the west, not forward. We're stuck between the two destructive forces of progressives pushing their insane anti-male agenda a…
/r/MensRights23/05/19 09:52 AM
4

They seem to have no patience for men who feel distress about women Treating this phenomenon as if it were a social construct would be a huge mistake. This is evolutionarily encoded into human beings and it won't change in the foreseeable future, so it's a no-brainer that it's a lot better to adapt to it than it is to whine about it and trying to piss against the wind. People actually have no patience for emotional men, for all intents and purposes this can be treated as a fact rooted in human b…
/r/MensRights22/05/19 11:02 AM
3

This is just a con game, like most other things feminists and progressives push. They don't care about the wellbeing of men, they don't want a "solution" to whatever they point out as a problem, they just want to 1. complain, complain, complain (see critical theory); 2. harass men with something, anything. For anyone with at least a dozen working brain cells it's pretty obvious that it's better for us men to be tough and stoic, regardless if we like it or not, that's just the way the world works…
/r/MensRights22/05/19 10:51 AM
5

We're not herd creatures like women are, and evolution made sure that nobody cared about men's problems anyways. We're individuals and adults, if you have a problem you should fix it yourself. Women are a collective made up of children, if one of them has a problem they all have a problem and the adults need to fix it ASAP.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 08:42 AM
1

"distracting framework" It teaches you what women find attractive and how you can be like that. I wonder who does it distract and from what. Girl with a rape fetish: The less attractive the guy is What an idea, if you can't find a partner look for a girl with a rape fetish... Best advice ever :) It's also wrong, most girls with rape fantasies would still want to be raped by handsome guys, preferably celebrities, not random homeless bums. Girl who is super insecure: The less attractive guy is Wom…
/r/MensRights17/05/19 08:18 AM
2

It's a freakin' tragedy that we've accepted social terrorism as the norm. We need laws against this moral retribution bullshit driven by self-importance that makes innocent people lose their livelihoods, or worse.
/r/MensRights16/05/19 11:10 AM
2

This is an assessment of PUA akin to saying MRAs are just a bunch of whiners who can't get laid. For f_ck's sake, see beyond the stereotypes if you want to talk about a subject. There are of course scam artists out there but if you spend just half an hour actually going through PUA material you'll realize it's A LOT more than "slog through the rejection", it actually teaches you tons of useful things noone else does. to hit on a girl whose "type" is whatever the dude happens to be The idea that …
/r/MensRights16/05/19 11:03 AM
38

Demented.
/r/MensRights09/05/19 01:36 PM
5

Reacting to the NYT headline: well, yes, as long as it's okay for the ditched husband to murder the ex-wife in cold blood. I'd say that would be perfectly moral and should be legally acceptable.
/r/MensRights09/05/19 01:33 PM
0

You probably talk about what you think of when you hear the word "progress", I talk about the political side calling themselves progressives. But yeah, there's nothing actually progressive about them, it's not a joke when they're called regressives.
/r/MensRights09/05/19 11:06 AM
3

It's not about jokes or tweets, it's just progressives using every existing weapon against people who they view as enemies. That's all. Nobody gives a f_ck about 3 year old tweets about not raping someone, this is just the kavanaughing of Sargon. If there were nothing to attack him with they'd get a woman to say he raped her 14 years ago. Progressives think this is okay because they want power so bad it justifies anything to them.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 02:05 PM
1

I'm not buying into the progressive bullshit that saying words to troll others or to be edgy means you hate entire demographics or think they're inferior to you. A lot of people say words like that specifically because they're annoyed by others trying to bully them into not saying them, or to wind up anti-freespeech bigots.
/r/MensRights06/05/19 08:01 AM
2

Don't ruin our own life confronting irrational haters, it does no good to anyone.
/r/MensRights03/05/19 09:30 AM
3

The title of the post says "Cardi B drugged and raped men", and I just pointed out how this is a lie. That's all. There's enough shit on her as it is, we don't need to lie to make it look worse.
/r/MensRights03/05/19 09:27 AM
2

Men are sooo entitled these days... /s
/r/MensRights03/05/19 09:25 AM
3

Yes it is but it doesn't warrant calling her a rapist, for fuck's sake... In case you misunderstood I was not defending her drugging and robbing people and I also didn't say what she did was better than Notch voicing his opinion, I just implied we shouldn't say she raped people when she didn't.
/r/MensRights03/05/19 09:22 AM
5

There's nothing 'mean' about the police collecting all the relevant evidence in serious investigations, in fact this always should've been one of the first steps.
/r/MensRights03/05/19 09:20 AM
5

This betrays how the entire progressive construct of faux psychology/sociology is pure bullshit driven by their sick ideology, as they say contradictory things like anything that harms men is toxic masculinity but self-sacrifice is positive masculinity. At this point anyone taking words coming out of the mouth of progressives seriously is an idiot. ...that's not the same thing as taking them seriously though, they can not and must not be ignored because if we let them spread their bullshit they …
/r/MensRights03/05/19 08:56 AM
1

She didn't rape them as far as I know, the point of drugging them was exactly to avoid having to have sex with them... She was a prostitute who sometimes drugged and robbed men instead of providing them with the service they paid her for. Edit: The title of the post says "Cardi B drugged and raped men", and I just pointed out how this is a lie. That's all. There's enough shit on her as it is, we don't need to lie to make it look worse.
/r/MensRights03/05/19 08:49 AM
18

"Went crazy" = voices his otherwise totally normal opinion even though progressive activists hate him for it.
/r/MensRights03/05/19 08:46 AM
11

"Controversial" is just a code word for progressives seeing it as non-progressive, nothing more, nothing less. There's nothing actually controversial about saying things like "it's okay to be white". People who hate whites try to make a controvery about it, but it's their problem, there's not a single mentally sound person in existence thinking that's a controversial statement.
/r/MensRights03/05/19 08:45 AM
2

My first thought about all this is if your wife disrespects you in front of your children, and/or overrides your decisions without having a conversation with you first, and/or has the idea that because of a quarrel you should sleep on the couch, well, you're thoroughly fucked. If there were no kids in the picture I'd say divorce her immediately, but since there are kids here the guy is in a pretty shitty position. My second thought is this situation is the result of fucking up the education syst…
/r/MensRights02/05/19 01:38 PM
0

You know "facts and data" include things like statistics saying that women are more inclined than men to do X and Y, ie. the things you call "generalizations" are based on the same facts and data you seem to idolize. Maybe you miss the fact that generalizations are not statements about every single person belonging to a group? This is basic stuff. If someone says women tend to avoid personal responsibility more than men that's a statistical fact proven by dozens of psychological and sociological…
/r/MensRights02/05/19 09:51 AM
1

You care more about looking good than the truth. It's fine by me, it just makes having conversations with you meaningless as you will oppose any truth that you think looks bad.
/r/MensRights30/04/19 01:04 PM
1

Try to free yourself from these mental shackles.
/r/MensRights30/04/19 11:05 AM
3

You don't seem to realize that demanding protection IS a part of female nature. What you said does not disprove what I said.
/r/MensRights30/04/19 09:23 AM
1

...and yet in another post here at MR people are feigning offense that someone wrote women don't like to take responsibility.
/r/MensRights29/04/19 12:18 PM
0

Feminism is the dark side of female nature brought into the light.
/r/MensRights29/04/19 08:44 AM
1

Another piece of evidence showing this is indeed a left-right issue.
/r/MensRights29/04/19 08:43 AM
3

Anyone pointing out how retarded Clementine Ford is deserves applause.
/r/MensRights29/04/19 08:42 AM
2

Thank you for being what seems to be the only sane person here today. going to a party with a rich guy I think it's clear he meant going to a rich guy's home either 1-on-1 or with his friends many-on-1. English is obviously not his first language, but this seems to be lost on people who mock his grammar instead of trying to figure out what he means.
/r/MensRights29/04/19 07:55 AM
1

Apt username.
/r/MensRights29/04/19 07:45 AM
1

YEAH, because if there were no comments like this SJWs would totally treat us in a fair and just manner... For the love of f_ck, people, get a grip. What is this, opposite day, april the first, or what the hell? Am I missing a joke here? Whose idea was that we should try to pander to those who hate us anyways?
/r/MensRights29/04/19 07:44 AM
2

I despise this black&white mentality that was foisted on us by progressives, the blindness to nuance and the unwillingness to interpret anything the way it was intended and instead interpret it through the perpetual outrage filter. This comment is morally perfectly okay, in fact I'm willing to bet that sane people still teach their daughters not to go to stangers' houses to "party" at night, especially in circumstances they can easily be overpowered and nobody knows where they are. If you take u…
/r/MensRights29/04/19 07:39 AM
1

Congratulations for disproving things I never said.
/r/MensRights26/04/19 09:28 AM
3

We've just gotta let it go, don't give them any more money because you'll only encourage more of it. This is so sad and so true. Progressives have already taken over practically everything, the entertainment industry included, and we can't do anything about it apart from giving them the middle finger. Stock up on classics and learn to enjoy them like a connoisseur because an ever increasing chunk of new stuff coming out will be absolute trash. Or we can crowdfund based creators until that's bann…
/r/MensRights25/04/19 09:58 AM
2

The lack, or the loss of close personal relationships most of the time. For teenage boys it's utter failure in their love lives, for adult men it's their kids taken away via divorce. Both are exacerbated by society treating men as worthless, and the lack of help/support. It's a lot easier to feel like losing something good is "the end of your life" if life treats you like shit by default. Girls are taught they are valuable from a very young age (it's practically encoded in their genes by evoluti…
/r/MensRights25/04/19 09:51 AM
-4

We shouldn't adopt feminist victim narratives, especially obvious fake ones. Saying 12,000 boyscouts were abused is like saying 1 in 4 women are raped at universities. It's transparent bullshit.
/r/MensRights24/04/19 10:38 AM
1

Problem is, most women nowadays are totally brainwashed to the point of actually believing that men don't have to do anything to be successful. We just stand around with our hands in our pockets and the world gives us money and fame for free, because penis. They actually believe this. We need to kick their asses out of the education system because otherwise this will never stop, in fact it will only worsen.
/r/MensRights24/04/19 10:36 AM
2

There weren't enough dykes around to keep them in business? What a shame.
/r/MensRights24/04/19 10:28 AM
2

etc...aren't really supposed to be what Feminism clammers for You assume that anything feminists say should be taken at face value. ROTFL. Feminists have a problem with men and everything related or symbolizing men, plain and simple. They want to take away everything we have created, from male spaces to male role models, leadership positions and so on. What they want wrt entertainment is to put women in every enviable position and to push men into what's left: the role of villains, idiots, loser…
/r/MensRights24/04/19 10:25 AM
1

There is a technical distinction between not being able to properly prove something or proving its opposite, yes, but I'm fairly certain RFANA doesn't grasp this properly, instead she thinks everyone accused of rape is automatically guilty. Anyways, our justice systems work in a way that a 'not guilty' verdict should be treated as a declaration of innocence for all intents and purposes. If people keep second guessing judges or juries the justice system can't operate properly.
/r/MensRights17/04/19 10:05 AM
2

You are perfectly free to do whatever you want to do. Evolution has shaped women to despise weakness in men though, regardless if you approve of this or not. This of course is just a guideline and not something absolute, but if you have an IQ above room temperature you should already know this. Crying once in a decade thanks to some deep emotional shock in front of a woman who already loves you probably won't destroy her love for you. But if a female stranger sees you crying over a shitty movie …
/r/MensRights17/04/19 09:09 AM
1

I literally wrote that this isn't about that, but it seems no sub is without retards, sadly.
/r/MensRights17/04/19 08:55 AM
-3

You misrepresent what she says. She doesn't at all say SW made men undateable. She talks about how some modern men are effeminate puddles of estrogen and it shows when they break down in tears at freakin' movie trailers, and that women in general find this off-putting. She is right, and this is a fair warning to men: if you want women to respect you don't be like trailer guy. Actually this is better dating advice than 95% of the regular fairy tales bullshit. Being upset or offended about this on…
/r/MensRights16/04/19 01:08 PM
1

Things should go the other way, we need more freedom and playfulness and less puritanism. WAY less puritanism. Taking a picture of someone at their workplace is sexual harassment now? Buzz the f_ck off...
/r/MensRights16/04/19 12:57 PM
5

The real question is how was he found guilty without any actual evidence. Do we still live in a world where a woman's word is enough to to prove a man's guilt? I thought we had a justice system designed to spare the innocent from unjust punishment...
/r/MensRights09/04/19 01:01 PM
2

Progressive activists will always be dishonest, they will lie about people they view as their enemies without a second thought. They've been doing this for ever and will continue to do so as long as they suffer no negative consequences for it. If you think they care about anything besides grabbing ever more power to abuse you're delusional. Truth, facts or logic mean nothing to them, in fact they view these as obstacles in the way of getting more power.
/r/MensRights09/04/19 12:47 PM
1

Please tell me where this "worshipping" takes place, I'm curious and want to read it.
/r/MensRights03/04/19 01:15 PM
3

It's a fucked up situation because it actually was a bad idea, and this has been proven beyond any doubt with this prolonged social experiment we live in. There is enough statistical difference between how men and women see politics that the increasing female participation has totally changed politics, and not for the better. Generally speaking men value freedoms and personal human rights more, while women generally want more of a safety net and a nanny state that provides it. It's women who are…
/r/MensRights03/04/19 01:12 PM
1

The idea that things should be banned is toxic.
/r/MensRights03/04/19 01:02 PM
12

Should there be any duty to have sex in a relationship Absolutely, in both ways. When you demand that a person does not have sex with anyone else but you, you also accept the responsibility that comes with it, ie. that you have to fulfill that person's intimate needs. If you're not willing to do that don't start monogamous relationships. Doesn't considering "threatening to leave a relationship to get sex" to be abusive prevent people from discussing their sexual needs and negotiating on how to m…
/r/MensRights03/04/19 12:39 PM
1

Biden is weird with women and kids, that's absolutely sure, but nothing captured on camera has ever reached the level of sexual misconduct. Touching the face or hair of someone in a way that is supposed to be endearing can come off as creepy, absolutely, but to say that that's harassment or assault is retarded. Until we see any kind of proof that he did anything illegal he should get the benefit of the doubt. Having said that, Biden is a horrendous politician spreading hateful anti-white and ant…
/r/MensRights03/04/19 12:16 PM
1

Politics in the west is over. We now live in a world where politicians' preferred method of beating their opponents is have them be accused of sexual assault.
/r/MensRights03/04/19 11:50 AM
1

So titling your post as a TL;DR of an article gets it removed? Weird.
/r/MensRights03/04/19 11:48 AM
3

The family is a team and should be treated as such at all times by people who want it to work flawlessly. A kid is not the mother's or the father's, it's a joint venture regardless of the fact that it grows in the woman's womb. If the mother starts treating the father as a second class parent the relationship is already fucked.
/r/MensRights19/03/19 01:31 PM
7

You know what, if a woman starts crying because she's reminded that the father of their children is just as much of a parent as she is, she's either consciously manipulating the guy with tears, or a hysterical idiot. A sane human being would have smiled and said "of course dear". If you allow your partner to act like OP's wife you will get more and more of that behavior until it breaks the relationship by either you losing your shit eventually, or the woman getting bored of you being a spineless…
/r/MensRights19/03/19 01:22 PM
5

It wasn't appropriate for the woman to say something stupid like that. This situation sheds a light on how gynocentric our societies are, we teach girls/women that pregnancy is "their thing", and they settle into this view pretty comfortably, dismissing and ignoring fathers and fatherhood as something irrelevant. Well fuck all of 'em, it takes two people to create a child and fathers have feelings too, and whenever a woman acts like the father is just a sperm donor whose feelings can be safely i…
/r/MensRights19/03/19 01:14 PM
12

Yeah, it's obvious by now that feminist-inspired characters and stories are astronomically boring and one-dimensional. Since all female characters must be perfect from the get-go there can be no character development, no real story arc, no hardships, no setbacks, no defeats, no tension, just cruising through everything with yawning ease.
/r/MensRights19/03/19 01:01 PM
2

Amnesty International NZ used that language in a Facebook post and I was quite shocked. AI is a radical progressive organization masquerading as caring about human rights, much like the SPLC, ADL, and many others. If you're shocked that they spew destructive leftist rhetoric you haven't been paying attention.
/r/MensRights19/03/19 12:41 PM
2

This is generic leftist garbage. Progressives view any- and everything that isn't progressive as an enemy to be destroyed, and anyone who likes those things "side with the enemy" in their minds, so they must also be destroyed. JP is not a right-winger or an MRA, but since he's also not a progressive they view him (and anyone who likes him) as an enemy. Progressives are insane, but they were trained to be so for this exact purpose. Our education systems have become indoctrination camps for leftis…
/r/MensRights19/03/19 12:36 PM
4

This is generic progressive anti-white and anti-male propaganda that's designed to convince white people not to have kids. That's good for diversity you know. Mainstream media is your enemy, always treat it as such, because it sure as hell treats you as its enemy.
/r/MensRights19/03/19 12:26 PM
4

If you want positivity you have to look for it, or even better, create it in your own life. You won't find much of it in the social sphere or in the media. Choose the people who you spend time with carefully, and you'll get all the positivity you need. There are tons of good women out there.
/r/MensRights19/03/19 12:23 PM
1

False accusations are pretty rare, just like actual sexual assault. Most people live their lives without ever being raped or falsely accused of raping anyone. Panic about this topic is not warranted. Relax. In college you can avoid almost all uncomfortable or harmful situations by keeping quiet about your beliefs. Don't confront progressives, they're vicious animals who will try to ruin you if they find out you're not one of them, and falsely accusing you of stuff is part of this tactic, so if y…
/r/MensRights14/03/19 01:54 PM
2

Excuse me? This is finding indirect and idiotic ways to deal with the artificial insanity injected into a normal world. We would be a lot better off if we purged the feminist insanity altogether and forgot all this bullshit about retroactive changes in consent and whatnot. The system we had for many decades, ie. that it's rape if consent could not have been given at all or if the victim made clear it's not given worked perfectly well and we should return to that instead of creating demented form…
/r/MensRights13/03/19 12:21 PM
2

Fiercly oppose anything they throw at you even if it gets you fired because your name and your dignity is more important than a job. If you agree to any deal or demand it will stay on you forever that you've admitted to raping her even if the deal itself doesn't contain any such admission. Making the deal itself will be seen as admission of guilt. This is not an advice but in your place I would quit that job and look up ways to harass the accuser without her being able to sue back. Send manure t…
/r/MensRights13/03/19 10:48 AM
3

Nothing. Well, it makes men-haters crazy, but that's not necessarily a problem in itself.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 02:58 PM
7

"Gender based violence" is an idiotic artificial category that points to something that doesn't exist to begin with, as nobody is harmed because of their gender. Nobody has ever thought "hey, that's a woman, let's rape/attack her because of it". People attack others for myriads of causes like anger, jealousy, money, etc., but being a woman is not on this list.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 02:56 PM
3

The largest problem with the mosuo is that they're stuck at medieval civilizational levels. If that's what a "matriarchy" gets you I'll stick with western civilization that had patriarchal roots, thank you.
/r/MensRights06/03/19 01:20 PM
1

Typical progressive bullshit that has nothing to do with truth or reality. Western societies have fucked up big time when we allowed this to develop under our noses, when we let the education system and the media turn into demented propaganda-dispensers for the progressive political movement without raising our voices. It will take monstrous effort to clean this mess up.
/r/MensRights05/03/19 10:04 AM
1

Yeah, the idea that the groups hated by progressives (cis white men) "feel threatened" by equality, or the demand for equality, is a demented lie. Nobody feels threatened by having equal rights or opportunities with others. No-fuckin'-body. What people (not just men, and not just whites) find abhorrent is when under the guise of equality some people attack unprotected demographics openly. Take for example the latest Captain Marvel fiasco. Progressives say men are "threatened" by Brie Larson bein…
/r/MensRights05/03/19 09:39 AM
7

According to statistics women have a similar chance of being struck by lightning as being raped by a stranger while walking around in public. If they "prepare" for this every time they step outside they're retarded. Letting men be demonized and scolded won't solve this problem (in fact it will only make it worse), but stopping feminist fearmongering would.
/r/MensRights05/03/19 09:22 AM
1

This is an unbelievable pile of horse manure. Keep boycotting nike forever.
/r/MensRights26/02/19 12:08 PM
2

There are women who are shorter than you, date them. Until then go with escorts. No reason not to, really. Don't ruin your own life with empty moralizing.
/r/MensRights19/02/19 01:38 PM
3

I thought it was sarcastic enough to not need the /s tag at the end but I should have known better... Nowadays nothing is sarcastic enough to be distinguishable from something dimwits say seriously.
/r/MensRights19/02/19 01:27 PM
7

Feminism was originally designed as a system to put women on par with men when it was not so Nopes. Men and women had different rights and responsibilities back then, and from the get-go feminists have demanded a redistribution of these in such a way that women have all the rights and none of the responsibilities. Contemporary feminists like to say early feminists demanded equal rights, but they forget to mention that they never advocated for equal responsibilties or for giving up rights exclusi…
/r/MensRights19/02/19 12:20 PM
3

Feminism is good for men though, so please just ignore things like this and move on.
/r/MensRights19/02/19 12:15 PM
1

Blizzard, like many other companies in the entertainment industry, is gone. Stop giving money to them. Stop giving money to any company that promotes progressive ideology because otherwise this will never end. Pirate their content if you can or look for alternatives if you can't.
/r/MensRights19/02/19 12:07 PM
1

We live in an age where being pro-female and anti-male is just the baseline. Movies and people that are openly hateful and hostile toward men are considered somewhat feminist, but that's perfectly healthy, don't you know? What, are you a mysygynyst incel? /s
/r/MensRights18/02/19 01:54 PM
2

We should live in free countries where this kind of thing is allowed. The proper reaction if you don't like this is to go there and tell them you will never go there again because of this. Tell your friends the same. You shouldn't take away other people's freedom but that doesn't mean you should give them your money. Fuck them.
/r/MensRights18/02/19 01:38 PM
5

Women were denied rights that society now believes to be fair and just The wrong doers were male, the victims were female Therefore the current generation of men owes a collective duty to compensate for the historical wrongs Most rational people would support points (1) and (2) and baulk at (3). Nope, all 3 are utter bullshit. Women had DIFFERENT rights than men back then, something that were related to them having different responsibilities. The view that different means worse for women is pure…
/r/MensRights18/02/19 01:32 PM
3

What you don't yet see is that the same thing is true for practically every arm of the progressive movement. All the "facts" about how blacks are oppressed, how LGBT people are persecuted, migration is positive, diversity is a strength, and so on, are known lies. It's easier to understand all this if you realize that the modern progressive left is a product of cultural marxism, something that actively developed rhetorical tools and techniques to beat their opponents, and most of these techniques…
/r/MensRights18/02/19 01:08 PM
3

Is Google actively suppressing news where women are the perpetrator? Absolutely. Why is this even a question? After the firing of Damore and what's going on youtube it should be clear to everyone that goolag is thoroughly committed to serving the progressive cause. They actively suppress anything that doesn't look progressive enough to them.
/r/MensRights15/02/19 12:12 PM
1

Erhm, I find it strange that I'm the first to tell you but "conservative" is not a synonym for white men either. There are tens of millions of blacks, women and whatnot in the US who consider themselves conservatives. It's mind-blowing that you do the same thing to conservatives that Vice does to the MRM while taking offense that they're doing it...
/r/MensRights15/02/19 12:08 PM
1

You consider "sexualization" bad because you assume it harms someone, don't you? If it doesn't harm anyone then who the fuck cares? And that's the point here, parents talking about how their kid's dick is huge is harmless blabbering. Sexualization is bad when it's done to kids who are presented to adults for their entertainment, like child beauty pageants where pre-pubescent girls are dressed up like hookers or when teenage boys dress in drag and dance for adult gay men. That's sexualization and…
/r/MensRights15/02/19 10:47 AM
0

Your point being? Western people has been so thoroughly brainwashed with progressivism it boggles the mind. The fact that parents talk about their kids' genitals is not "sexualizing" the kid. Sexualization of kids is something like letting/making a young boy wear female clothes and dance for gay men. He is sexualized by the act of wearing sexy adult clothes plus makeup and doing things that are considered erotic, and that he's doing all this for adult people's adult entertainment. Parents talkin…
/r/MensRights15/02/19 10:20 AM
0

It's true though.
/r/MensRights14/02/19 10:19 AM
1

You believe this because you were brainwashed for decades. Feminism was created as an arm of the marxist movement, and it was written by Marx & Engels themselves that marxism should use women to destroy the nuclear family, and western style civilization with it. Nothing has changed since then. The problem is that this isn't taught at schools, they teach pro-feminist garbage instead. No wonder people know jackshit fuckall about what feminism actually is.
/r/MensRights14/02/19 10:18 AM
2

He talks like a classic leftist in a crowd of progressives. Problem is dems have no credibility whatsoever, and it will take a lot of hard work to get it back. I'm not voting for anyone willingly associating with the likes of Hillary, Pelosi and Schumer.
/r/MensRights14/02/19 09:24 AM
-1

Thing is, responding to the backlash against (supposedly) caring about white men the writer said the article is about how white boys need to be taught about their privileges. I tried to read it but on page 670 it got boring as hell since it's really about nothing. For example it talks about how this one guy had a fight with a girl for 355 pages, drawing no conclusions and saying nothing about what anything means or what the writer thinks. Modern journalism at its finest... It's telling though th…
/r/MensRights14/02/19 09:20 AM
1

Handsome my ass, he looks like a monkey and his eyes are devoid of any intellect. Sadly enough for the kid IQ is mostly hereditary...
/r/MensRights14/02/19 09:07 AM
-11

Talking about how the girls will like him when he grows up is not sexualizating him as an infant. Learn to differentiate between what does harm and what doesn't. Let us not turn into SJWs please.
/r/MensRights14/02/19 09:06 AM
5

It's part of the jewish religion and given the chance they foisted it on other nations/religions in the past, this is why it's widespread in north africa and the middle east. There was a separate wave of popularizing it in the US when the founder of Kellogg's started a movement advocating for circumcision as a way to stop boys from masturbating. (My spider sense is saying Mr. Kellogg might have been a jew.) In europe only jews do it, it's practically unheard of for whites to circumcise their kid…
/r/MensRights14/02/19 08:58 AM
1

Yeah, people, please don't pay for this movie in any way, just pirate it instead. There's no need to call it a boycott or anything, just don't give your hard-earned money to people who spread hatred, it's that simple.
/r/MensRights14/02/19 08:46 AM
1

The "issue" that I've seen people talk about was that they chose a white guy for the cover, but it's black history month, so it's supposedly racist. Problem is - ignoring that nothing about this is racist anyways - this is the cover for March, and BHM is february. SJWs are total nutjobs.
/r/MensRights13/02/19 01:00 PM
1

As a side note of sorts, innocent gestures like the one described in the comment were considered perfectly acceptable both ways before feminism took over, and if they weren't welcome women were able to handle the situation. The idea that a random kiss is "sexual assault" that warrants outrage and/or involving the police and the justice system is insane and destructive. We should return to saner times when people didn't think that puritanical anti-male feminist bullshit is normal and reasonable. …
/r/MensRights13/02/19 11:25 AM
1

Considering it's /latestageretardedness we're proud of it.
/r/MensRights31/01/19 01:04 PM
1

Its quite interesting, and ironic. If you mean idiotic and abhorrent, then yes, it is.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 12:17 PM
3

Stop looking for trouble, it's not worth it. Progressives can ruin your entire life if they want to, so don't give them the chance. Whatever you do online that's considered bad by progressives do it STRICTLY anonymously and DON'T tell your peers about it because there's always one who talks. This is a fucked up world kid, you have to be smart and careful. What happened to the Covington boys can happen to anyone, and you want to avoid that as much as possible. Fight smarter.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 12:08 PM
2

Those people should rot in jail.
/r/MensRights17/01/19 01:05 PM
2

Funny how tons of people know this is a political/cultural war, but pretend not to know this because it doesn't suit their interests. Feminists view themselves (and women) as left-wingers, they view the MRM (and men) as right-wing, and they know for a fact that the Gillette ad was a leftist attack on the enemy men, so it's obvious why the non-leftists oppose it. But try to say these things out loud and they'll tell you your delusional, there's nothing leftist about either feminism or Gillette, i…
/r/MensRights17/01/19 01:01 PM
295

Yeah, it's ironic how these fuckers don't even realize they are doing the very thing they say is 'toxic masculinity'. Tells you all you need to know about the entire situation. It's a progressive attack against men and progressives bash and shame those who don't like it, perpetuating the very thing they pretend to fight against.
/r/MensRights16/01/19 11:23 AM
1

It's not just about the statistical predictions. The real problem comes from political division, ie. how when conservatives say mass migration is a problem progressives always double down on how that's the best thing ever and those who think otherwise are just racists. The political side that controls the majority of the first world (with a couple of exceptions like the US under Trump) insists on keeping all borders open, and this will spell the end of western cultures. If islam doesn't demolish…
/r/MensRights16/01/19 10:32 AM
2

You know, the idea that providing food and shelter to your own kids is a form of slavery or self-sacrifice is a very stupid one. It's just a mirror image of the feminist notion that the worst enemy of a woman is her own family because they prevent her from having the best career/most fun possible. This is a poisonous, self-destructive idea used to destroy the west. If you look at things pragmatically and stoically, the vast majority of men have no other option but to work full time for their ent…
/r/MensRights15/01/19 05:44 PM
1

There's nothing wrong with SAHDs but that doesn't mean the model will work. Sometimes what you find cool and what works in reality simply don't match. The first problem with staying at home while your wife works is it kills some of the attraction your wife feels for you. It's a statistical fact that more marriages end in divorce where the husband is the SAHD. Women's unconscious minds looks for men to mate with who can provide them and the kids with resources, and if she has to work while you do…
/r/MensRights15/01/19 04:58 PM
1

Yeah, and if don't have kids we're disappearing in a generation. But hey, at least the peoples replacing us will have a fantastic civilization to take over, right?
/r/MensRights15/01/19 04:34 PM
1

I was probably a member of this sub before you even knew it existed, but this is besides the point. The point is that nowadays two huge political forces are vying for power in the west, the progressive/globalists and the conservative/nationalists. You could say you want to stay out of this shitshow altogether but if the former team wins they'll fuck you over anyways. Misandry is an integral part of the progressive mindset in case you didn't notice... So if you want to stop feminists from gaining…
/r/MensRights15/01/19 04:30 PM
2

Nobody says you can't, it's just silly for a couple of reasons. You want me to explain them?
/r/MensRights15/01/19 04:15 PM
-3

I'm not saying money is bad, I'm saying more money is less of a positive than X amount of money plus someone in the family being able to raise the kids at home. Caring for your kids? You mean, sipping red wine while she's watching Ellen? That's your version of valuing your family? You probably misread my words because you seem to have interpreted them as "being a SAHM is the hardest job in the world", something I never said or even hinted at. What I say is it's a lot better for my kids to be wit…
/r/MensRights15/01/19 02:45 PM
0

People who use MGTOW as a form of insult instantly prove beyond any doubt that they know jack shit about the movement, they get their beliefs from feminists who hate the MGTOW movement because it takes power away from them. Using incel as an insult OTOH is an age-old trope, people who have no arguments almost always use this form of ad hominem against men. Thinking that they win debates by calling others virgins or whatever shows they not only have no idea what a proper debate is and how to part…
/r/MensRights15/01/19 02:00 PM
0

Ever since feminism became mainstream women are less and less happy according to statistics, so please do explain how it's a "force for good". At the very best it's a force in service of a specific political ideology, not some moral good. Maybe ask feminists why they invariably vote for leftist men when they run against right-wing women, because to me it looks like feminism is just a strain of leftism that cares a lot more about power than about women. Anyways, nobody in the MRM wants to impede …
/r/MensRights15/01/19 01:50 PM
-2

You know it doesn't help me as a man if my wife also works full time, I'd rather have her at home caring for the kids because I value my family more than a second paycheck. I want my kids to be raised in the family, not by the state. So, if the choice is that either both of us work, or just one of us does, it's a no-brainer to choose the latter. Don't be fooled by feminism so much so that you go against your own interests just to defy it.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 01:36 PM
1

One of the chilling aspects of this story is how the BBC is now in the business of pointing at individuals for the progressive lynchmob to harass. Someone at BBC dislikes something for whatever reason, so they do some "activist journalism" attacking that thing, ie. they sic their viewers on it. This is textbook targeted harassment committed by a taxpayer funded organization. It's even worse than the CNN openly threatening the creator of a meme in the US about a year ago. Some fuckwit making yout…
/r/MensRights15/01/19 01:27 PM
5

Of course they "miss the point", misandry is an integral part of progressivism, and they see the MRM as their political enemies, so for them it's just another day in the culture wars - Gillette fired some shots at the enemy and the enemy fired back, something which they can't tolerate. The enemy must be destroyed.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 01:14 PM
2

How about not attacking the people who are on your side in the culture wars? It's beyond obvious at this point that feminism & misandry are integral parts of progressive ideology, so your only hope of getting rid of them - like it or not - is siding with conservatives. At least they can be reasoned and argued with, even if some of them prefer some traditional gender roles that are not very male-friendly.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 12:26 PM
1

Just ignore it, it's trolling.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 12:23 PM
1

If someone wants to end "gender violence" they can open a bottle of champaigne and celebrate since "gender violence" doesn't exist. Nobody is getting beaten because of their gender, whatever it is. No woman is beaten just because she's a woman. When people abuse others they have their reasons for it, but being associated with a gender is not one of those.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 12:22 PM
3

The graphic itself is retarded nonsense, the actual numbers are closer to 1 in 600 and 400 respectively.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 12:18 PM
3

It's freakin' PROCTER, not proctor. I know, I nitpick, but still, it grates on my nerves to see it spelled wrong so often.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 12:16 PM
1

Gillette (or more precisely Procter & Gamble) is not stupid, they are showing their loyalty to the progressive cause, which is worth more than just mere money at this point. Since tons of key companies in our economies are controlled by progressives and these are already used to boost the progressive cause and hinder everything else, you can expect a purge to start soon where giants like google, mastercard and others will use their clout in coordinated efforts to destroy non-progressive companie…
/r/MensRights15/01/19 12:14 PM
2

The next step will be to ban men from the unisex changing room for being toxic, and since men won't be able to change at all men will be banned from the institution altogether.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 12:06 PM
2

Progressives feel they're close to winning the culture wars and they really amped up their efforts lately. They are attacking from all angles. The APA deems masculinity toxic, the web giants have started to erase non-progressives, the banking system cuts ties with us, more and more companies show their loyalty to the progressive cause (like Nike and now Gillette), the entertainment industry is mostly gone... If we don't act soon we won't be able to any more, if it's not too late already. Liberal…
/r/MensRights15/01/19 12:00 PM
27

If this is about the Gillette ad how come Gillette is not on the list?
/r/MensRights15/01/19 11:54 AM
1

women living longer is a natural thing Sure, in societies where men work a lot more than women. There are countries where the difference is miniscule or zero.
/r/MensRights14/01/19 11:49 AM
1

So, feminist lies and fantasies then? I have never heard anything in my whole life that promoted misogyny to men. The other things you mentioned are misunderstandings and half-truths. Also, there's nothing toxic about them, or masculinity for that matter.
/r/MensRights11/01/19 02:58 PM
7

25 years of marriage, $66b, that's $2.64b/year or $220m/month. For what exactly? I know it's a scam, that's why I can't take any arguments for it seriously, like how she's accustomed to the lifestyle. Well, if you translate that to plain english it means that because he gave her a lot his earnings during the marriage he must be forced to give her even more of his earnings after the marriage. Sounds reasonable, doesn't it?
/r/MensRights10/01/19 01:13 PM
19

If I recall correctly the BBC worked with Clarkson even after firing him from Top Gear, which was one of the dumbest moves the BBC ever made, by the way. Jeremy has more talent and is worth more than the enitre politically correct shitfest he left behind. He doesn't talk about himself in this article, his point is the BBC doesn't hire any man because it's sexist as fuck, and he's perfectly right. And to be honest he wasn't actually fired for the 'fracas'. Progressive leaders at the BBC wanted hi…
/r/MensRights08/01/19 01:07 PM
1

You're in a weird position here because you seem to be genuinely well-intentioned (which is of course commendable), yet you miscalculate the proportion of feminists similar to yourself compared to the mainstream, which makes you claim certain things that are not quite true. What you talk about, this benevolent strain of feminism, is championed by people like Christina Hoff Sommers, and sadly it's quite apparent that the vast majority of feminists view this as an abomination, a bunch of heretics …
/r/MensRights08/01/19 12:30 PM
32

playing DND leaves you vulnerable Typical dumb progressive shit. There's nothing in role playing that someone couldn't say or do to you outside of it. Uncomfortable situations are exceedingly rare but it's very easy to get off your ass and leave if something is not to your liking.
/r/MensRights07/01/19 01:33 PM
22

Article: https://metro.co.uk/2019/01/04/men-disadvantaged-women-uk-us-europe-scientists-claim-8309361/ The source: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0205349
/r/MensRights07/01/19 12:56 PM
24

I'm lucky enough to have avoided all major issues thus far, from conscription to MGM to child support and so on. I'm still just one false accusation away from my life being destroyed though. Any women or kid can just decide to fuck me over for whatever reason they see fit and practically nobody will stand with me while my name is dragged through the mud. Proven female child molesters are treated a thousands times more leniently by society than men accused of doing some mildly racy stuff decades …
/r/MensRights04/01/19 12:28 PM
2

Their depression and suicidal tendencies are caused by their inability to form intimate relationships. Shrinks might make them less depressed by teaching them mental strategies to cope with loneliness but that's not solving their problem, that's teaching them how to live with it. 99% of incels would turn to productive, sane human beings overnight if they found relationships, and that's what you need to facilitate if you want to actually help them. There are personality traits that make them unat…
/r/MensRights04/01/19 09:47 AM
3

What you're talking about is progress. Progress-ivism is a political movement represented by the democrats in the US and so-called "liberals" in Europe, and it has nothing to do with science or economic development. If you talk to actual progressives they will tell you about how evil whites and men are. Well, the original intent of progressives might've been positive, who knows, as they were invaded and taken over completely by cultural marxists long ago, just like liberals. If you believe progr…
/r/MensRights04/01/19 08:59 AM
5

ought not to be tolerated Until they do something illegal they should be free to say any damn thing they please. Your mindset that some people should be silenced is just about the same as theirs that some people should be treated as sex slaves. who's sexism is relatively benign Framing their stance as sexism doesn't help anyone, it just plays into feminist hands by using their idiotic terminology and "proving" their retarded view that women are discriminated against or viewed as inferior to men …
/r/MensRights03/01/19 03:45 PM
2

Most of the talk about privilege is bulldust, plain and simple. Vague - and often statistically false - notions about how cops won't stop you or how your demographic is wealthier than another are not privileges. They mean nothing to the individual. You can be a white kid who statistically should be rich and pampered yet you could grow up in a ghetto as the only white kid there, poor as dirt, and harassed every day of your life for being white. Group privilege should only ever mean things that ar…
/r/MensRights03/01/19 12:18 PM
20

What now, progressives don't like their own weapons used against them? The lesson of this is that men won't be free until progressive ideology is completely eradicated.
/r/MensRights03/01/19 10:36 AM
2

It's the jews. They see whites both as competitiors and as fools to be exploited/abused. We have allowed the jews to control the media and the education system and now many whites are brainwashed to hate themselves, and of course all other races/sexes/whatever are riled up against us. You think I'm a nazi or something? The guy who made the tweet is called Bernstein. Even if this one happened to be a troll account, which I doubt, there are thousands like it. Just look up the "fellow white people"…
/r/MensRights19/12/18 01:49 PM
6

Why am I not surprised he's called Bernstein...
/r/MensRights19/12/18 01:44 PM
4

What do you mean "falsely"? Idris Elba sexually assaulted me 27 years ago and I'm willing to testify.
/r/MensRights19/12/18 01:42 PM
1

Progressives refuse to use their brains when it would go against their ideology. If 1% of people in group A are criminals while 10% of people in group B are criminals mixing them together will result in group A seeing a rise in crime. Basic fuckin' mathematics, a 6 year old would understand it intuitively, but of course progressives must deny this because they want immigration to happen and they can't allow anything to shine a bad light on it. So, they MUST reframe the situation to put the blame…
/r/MensRights15/12/18 12:05 PM
2

Now, two of the most powerful women on the world stage, Nancy Pelosi and Theresa May, have been forced to agree to an end date of their role in government in order to keep their positions during times of great stress Believing that two politicians who did a really bad job and are now asked to resign from their positions by their own parties is somehow an attack on women that takes the world back into the past is a surefire sign of being brainwashed by one of the most idiotic and hateful ideologi…
/r/MensRights15/12/18 10:54 AM
0

This is what progressivism looks like, or at least its current iteration until it moves on to the next stage, demanding separate bathrooms for tall people, people with cats, or whatever insane bullshit will strike their fancy next. The old setup was pretty perfect and it worked properly for hundreds and hundreds of years, there was no need to change it. When men and women had separate restrooms that was pretty "equal" if you think about it. Progressivism always causes unnecessary problems and th…
/r/MensRights15/12/18 09:24 AM
7

Don't talk to feminists if at all possible. Why would you??? They're brainwashed cogs in an evil machine and they probably can't contribute anything positive to your life without also being a huge risk of turning on you if they find out you're not a hateful bigot like them. If you don't have the time or your conversational partner doesn't have the patience for you to explain your stance don't talk about feminism at all. If you see a chance that you can convert anyone just ask them why it is that…
/r/MensRights15/12/18 09:13 AM
2

This might help. I have a more 'esoteric' personal theory about how fate, or whatever you want to call it, blinds many people to their own roles in history. If nazis realized that they were the bad guys they probably didn't start WW2, or end it real quick. History or fate blinded them - they slowly grew into a role where they thought they were doing some good thing, or bad things for good reasons. Just by talking to them you couldn't have woken them up no matter how persuasive your argument woul…
/r/MensRights14/12/18 01:03 PM
8

For fuck's sake, the article openly admits that conservatives are for due process and progressives are openly against it and yet it still tries to chastise conservatives for not being pro-due process enough. Obama destroyed due process on campuses and Betsy Devos is bringing it back, so would you please stop bothering the side that is actually doing a good thing and start pestering those responsible for the problem in the first place?
/r/MensRights13/12/18 02:09 PM
2

And I would agree with you wholeheartedly if leftists hadn't poison that well already. I mean it's usually progressive concern trolls who complain about Trump's style, who wouldn't accept him any more even if he was a carbon copy of Trudeau or Macron because they actually hate him for being non-progressive, his style is just an excuse. Sorry for assuming you were one of them, but you're the exception, the rule is them.
/r/MensRights13/12/18 08:52 AM
1

Even though it isn’t desirable for men to show emotion, they shouldn’t be shamed when they do. Look, we live in a world where "shouldn't be" is irrelevant. You, like many other people, seem to base your thoughts about reality not on reality itself but a utopian vision of it, ie. how things "should be". This is only okay when specifically talking about what an utopia would look like, it shouldn't be used as a strategy to base real world decisions on. When men show emotion freely most women find i…
/r/MensRights12/12/18 02:50 PM
1

What SHE did was textbook domestic violence according to feminists, and I wonder how much domestic violence men have to suffer before they are allowed to be upset about it. I also wonder why a man's retaliation nullifies the domestic violence he suffered before losing his patience. If the sexes were reversed feminists would have demanded the arrest of the guy way before she could have lost her patience. If you're a man try to shout at a woman and throw things at her and see where it gets you - b…
/r/MensRights12/12/18 02:43 PM
1

I'm not a Trump supporter per se, considering I have never set foot in the US, but hey. Still, if you start an article supposedly about divorce with Trump-bashing it just rakes my nerves the wrong way. I have heard how rude and whatnot he is from the leftist media a gazillion times, from the very same leftist media that's a thousand times more rude and which lies about everything in the world all the time. Believe me, if he's rude to someone, that person probably deserves way worse. And yes, aft…
/r/MensRights12/12/18 02:25 PM
2

If you're under constant attacks at some point you will have to take action to defend yourself. The fact that you have to get up from a sitting position for that means nothing.
/r/MensRights11/12/18 10:26 AM
2

I couldn't give a flying fuck about the opinions of progressives. #metoo is an ideologically driven hysteria aimed at taking men down which was never honest or benevolent to begin with, but it lost all its remaining illusions of credibility or relevancy in the Kavanaugh case. The basic premise was bullshit to begin with, ie. the idea that we don't talk about rape/assault enough. For fuck's sake, society has been talking about it constantly for decades, it was not a surprise to anyone that these …
/r/MensRights11/12/18 10:23 AM
1

This is just a thinly veiled political attack on Trump. Shove it where the sun don't shine.
/r/MensRights11/12/18 10:13 AM
3

That's rich in an environment where it's considered an olympic sport for women aged 30+ to whine about the dearth of "good men" and how they're miserably lonely. You can't hear a peep from most men though.
/r/MensRights11/12/18 10:10 AM
2

Strength isn't an argument and shouldn't be treated as such. If he's stronger that's all the more reason why she shouldn't attack him without provocation in the first place. This was a clear case of the woman attacking the man who CLEARLY didn't initiate anything, he just retaliated when things turned unbearable. Sure, hitting her was bad and he can be justifiably arrested for that but why are most people blind to the fact that she attacked him and he just reacted? She should be arrested and cha…
/r/MensRights11/12/18 10:06 AM
2

Not surprised that a case where a woman attacks a man and only the man gets shafted for hitting back piques the interest of the men's rights crowd? No shit...
/r/MensRights11/12/18 09:55 AM
1

Yeah, she was doing things any men would be arrested for, but come on, why did he hit back? Men are supposed to be these zen monks who never react to being harassed or attacked. Really though, what she did was classic domestc violence according to feminist standards. Most feminists would call for the arrest of any guy who does the things she did. Suggesting that men should play by the old rules while feminists have changed the game completely decades ago is pure silliness.
/r/MensRights11/12/18 09:52 AM
2

We're "defending" this fucker because justice is not determined by how likeable someone is, but the facts of the case. He was attacked multiple times before hitting back, in any sane society that's called self defence and treated as such. But of course we don't live in sane societies, we live in ones that ponder to women and treat men as shit, exemplified perfectly by this case. Try imagining it with the sexes reversed: a guy throwing stuff and shouting at a woman, punching her computer and the …
/r/MensRights11/12/18 09:46 AM
30

The Brock Turner bullshit does my head in. Fuckwits still use it as an example for white/male privilege while knowing jackshit fuckall about it. The guy met a girl in a bar while they were both drunk, they decided to go outside together for some fun, and while they were at it the girl fell asleep. When using either the classic definition of the word, or just common sense, it was not rape in any way, shape or form. Technically it can be considered sexual assault as the girl was drunk (but so was …
/r/MensRights11/12/18 09:28 AM
1

It was offered, it's just not mandatory, and at some places you have to pay for it. Which is cool as this vaccine is useless garbage, especially for boys, as HPV itself isn't deadly by any means, it's just considered to be a risk factor for cervical cancer, which doesn't affect boys all that often. Yeah, it might also be a risk factor for cancers of the anus or the penis, which are EXCEEDINGLY rare, like less than 1 in 10000 men get them. Getting vaccinated against that is a stupid move as it's …
/r/MensRights11/12/18 09:13 AM
-2

Fuck this "life saving" bullshit. HPV is one of the least deadly diseases ever. Almost everyone has it and practically nobody dies from it, it's just a risk factor in cervical cancer, which is rare. In the west about 1 in a 1000 woman gets it and about 1 in 3000 dies from it. Hardly the fuckin' black death if you ask me. It's a bit more common in Africa and 3rd world Asia so I guess that's a good enough reason to vaccinate british kids /s. Also, the vaccine's effectiveness is rather questionable…
/r/MensRights11/12/18 08:25 AM
2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vSrwlww1--g https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Jn2eI_wM9E There are more videos about privilege from the same guy.
/r/MensRights11/12/18 07:41 AM
1

You chauvinist pig! /s
/r/MensRights11/12/18 07:22 AM
1

Well, if you don't want women to find you attractive you can ignore their preferences, that's for sure. But this isn't a recipe too many men would like to follow if given a choice, and it's certainly not one I would prescribe to my son. Physical attraction is not changeable by conversations or debates, you can't just wish or demand that women desire weak, emotional men from now on. The reason we prefer the things that we do is because it helped us survive when we were danger of dying every day, …
/r/MensRights11/12/18 07:20 AM
1

Don't let them bullshit you. Call out their lies, or if they can harm you in any way then don't argue with them at all. Avoid feminists like the plague.
/r/MensRights10/12/18 11:11 AM
3

Practically every vocal, mainstream representative of feminism (from Hillary to Sarkeesian) stands for the worst aspects of feminism, the ones that merit the comparison to nazism, like the lies, the deliberate antagonization of the sexes, the bashing and demonizing of men, etc. Literally none of the MRM's vocal mainstream representatives stands for anything the MRM is accused of by its enemies.
/r/MensRights10/12/18 11:09 AM
3

Problem is, supposed good-natured feminists like you seem to have no idea that radical feminism is the mainstream. The most famous feminists, almost without exception, are the worst kind of political hacks and antagonizers who use lies and deception to make men and women hate each other. Take the wage gap for example, it has been debunked a millon times and from an economic viewpoint its existence is literally impossible and yet feminists keep talking about how women have to suffer this deeply u…
/r/MensRights10/12/18 10:47 AM
2

Considering the post was made by a woman about half of your comment is laughable bullshit. Anyways, it's important to point out the source of most of our problems, which is feminism, and the hypocrisy surrounding feminism that makes it virtually immune to critique and debunking. Part of our job is to wake up good natured but misguided feminists so they stop attacking men. Oh, and it would be nice if feminists had valid issues, it's just they can't seem to find any. Visit a feminist website today…
/r/MensRights10/12/18 10:33 AM
3

The "power of men" is a euphemism for the collective achievements of men that we work for with our sweat and blood. Work 80 hour work weeks for years and become the CEO of some company? Congratulations, you just happened to find the "power of men" by accident, at least according to feminists. Since they're not willing to put in as much work but they covet the fruits of it they must pretend it's not the work itself that results in power but that men unfairly expropriate power by oppressing/exploi…
/r/MensRights10/12/18 10:22 AM
1

Never stick your dick in crazy. Bail out at the first sign of a red flag about feminism, progressivism or a tendency to be vindictive towards men in general, ex-partners in particular. If you're paranoid enough you can design specific indirect questions that test for these things without being political or combative. Learn how to handle women. Yes, this means you should learn game, swallow the red pill, or whatever they call it nowadays. No, that's not misogyny, and no, that's not exclusively fo…
/r/MensRights10/12/18 10:01 AM
6

I wonder what they would say if a male group started doing the same thing in reverse. I demand a male waiter, a male nurse, and so on. Or maybe we could just stop this retarded 'war of the sexes' that was created and is solely perpetuated by feminists.
/r/MensRights10/12/18 09:29 AM
3

The main problem is the exaggeration and the sensationalization of sexual violence against women, and you can't solve that by exaggerating and sensationalizing sexual violence against men. The "stats" in your quote are obvious bullshit. Weird or unpleasant but consensual sexual experiences or unwanted flirtation are not sexual assaults and everyone should stop treating them as such. Actual sexual assaults are more like 1 in a 1000, especially against men.
/r/MensRights10/12/18 09:25 AM
2

Sometimes there is a difference between what we think would be enlightened and what works in reality. In such cases it's always wiser to side with what works, as opposed to demanding reality to change. You can't just wish away millions of years of evolution that shaped women to desire strong men who are in control of their emotions, and despise weak men who are slaves to theirs.
/r/MensRights10/12/18 09:09 AM
2

They are different, which means they SHOULD be different. There are tons of reasons for that, one of them being that most women desire masculine men. Masculinity can be suppressed or cultivated during the bringing up of boys, and parents should go for cultivating it. This can of course be misunderstood or overdone, which might lead to problems, but the answer is not suppressing masculinity like feminists suggest.
/r/MensRights10/12/18 09:03 AM
1

Problem is, men DO NEED emotional toughness and resilience for a multitude of reasons. It might sound good to let boys be emotional, but it will probably hurt them in their adult lives. Unless we can reeducate women to not see being emotional as a weakness and a serious turn-off in men, which is of course absolutely impossible. I reckon it would be much better for us men to learn how to properly handle our inner conflicts without appearing weak and vulnerable than it would be to mimic the femini…
/r/MensRights10/12/18 08:53 AM
7

The mutilation of unwilling human beings, let alone helpless infants, is pure barbarism and should have no place in modern societies. There's no need for any debate on this, it's beyond self evident for anyone who isn't brainwashed with the sexist notion that it is indeed barbarism when done to girls, but hey, boys are different because, erhm, doing it to girls is worse. I hope I'll live to see our societies become enlightened enough to say that mutilating non-consenting human beings is strictly…
/r/MensRights19/11/18 01:32 PM
2

Most of these large companies like Microsoft get their revenue from male dominated enterprises, so it's not to market or gain traction with women. And I 100% dont believe any company "does the right thing" without gain... so why? When companies become influential enough the powers that be start using them to manipulate society, even if it makes them lose money. It's blatantly obvious in the case of the 4 social media giants (facebook, twitter, reddit, google w/ youtube) that they're more than wi…
/r/MensRights27/07/18 07:33 AM
2

I just had a few debates about this topic in the last couple of days so I'm not one to shy away from the subject, but I do feel like when an article about saving girls in africa is posted to r/upliftingnews maybe that's not the best time to bring up MGM. Let them have their uplifting news in peace and have the necessary debates at other times and places.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 07:20 AM
7

Nobody has ever said that women have to be/do any of these. Typical meaningless but combative feminist bullshit.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 07:15 AM
1

This topic isn't really in the profile of this sub, and his point was not that it's literally impossible to date without a criminal record. Still, tons of young women prefer men with an air of danger around them, so to speak, to the point where mass murderers receive thousands of love letters in prison from women they've never met. This is understandably a bitter pill to swallow for average guys who have good qualities but can't find a date since they're a bit shy or awkward. It's okay to tell t…
/r/MensRights27/07/18 06:46 AM
5

This seems retarded. We don't hate SJWs because they don't fight for us, we abhor the ideology that drives them, ie. the notion that societies should be divided into warring factions and some designated ones should be ganged upon by all others because slavery or patriarkee or whatever. SJWs don't fight for justice for anyone, they're useful idiots in the hands of those politicians who profit from us being divided and fighting each other while they build their little empires.
/r/MensRights24/07/18 09:15 AM
7

The idea of groups having group privilege was invented by progressive sociologists not that long ago to bolster their ideology about how society is but a mess of groups in perpetual struggle for power, and that some groups are good (invariably the less/least productive ones) but others are bad (the productive ones). Modern progressivism wants "progress" in a way that undermines what already exists so something else could be built upon its ruins, which on a personal level means they want to tear …
/r/MensRights24/07/18 08:44 AM
5

These autobans are so effin' retarded considering you can post/comment on a sub expressing your disagreement with it...
/r/MensRights09/07/18 09:24 AM
1

A perfect example of ideology over function: they will scold anyone even if it hurts their wallets because their ideology is more important to them than keeping the industry/employer that feeds them alive. They are self-destructive and they take everything they touch down with them.
/r/MensRights05/07/18 06:33 AM
0

Because a peck is not sexual and it's not harassment. It shouldn't be treated as such regardless of the sexes of the participants. The worst thing we can do in this case is to demand that it's treated as sexual harassment both ways.
/r/MensRights05/07/18 06:25 AM
1

They blame everything on Trump. Oh, and the guy intentionally tortured and murdered his ex-boss, that's what he was sentenced to death for, not for being gay.
/r/MensRights04/07/18 06:31 AM
11

Imagine this with the sexes reversed. Nobody would side with the guy.
/r/MensRights29/06/18 07:06 AM
1

this is a stupid argument. Women already know to keep safe, so reminding them, again, is sort of redundant. Apparently not, as lots of women still take unnecessary risks, like the one you mentioned. Feminism has ruined the minds of tons of young women who now firmly believe that 1. they're just as tough as men so they can protect themselves in any event, no fuss; 2. they have a "right" not to be victimized and this somehow magically protects them from criminals; 3. if a rapist actually shows up …
/r/MensRights20/06/18 12:45 PM
1

The fact that it's mostly men who buy sex is not anti-male, but there's nothing wrong with buying sex if the other party sells it voluntarily. You can draw some conclusions from this fact but in itself it's not a moral judgment on men. Most criminals are men, yeah, and there's nothing wrong with pointing this out if it's understood that "most" is not a synonym for "all". Saying these things in a factual manner is not a problem. What I was talking about was feminists lying about and distorting th…
/r/MensRights12/06/18 12:05 PM
1

Because the tool evolution gave women to solve their problems is complaining about them to men, who will fix them if bothered enough. It's in women's nature to show huge emotional responses to things they dislike, while we men usually control our emotions and prefer logical problem solving instead of throwing a tantrum (because nobody will solve men's problems for us). Progressive ideology is another, more modern reason as it teaches women to be on edge and constantly look for things to be offen…
/r/MensRights11/06/18 07:53 AM
13

Feminism propagates a sexist mindset, this is beyond any doubt. They frame almost everything as either zero sum games in which women must beat men to win, or women fighting against their oppressors which sets up men as evil folks who shouldn't be cared about because that would be immoral (siding with the oppressor against the oppressed).
/r/MensRights07/06/18 11:47 AM
5

Beause violence committed by men is properly addressed and dealt with by society. What is there to talk about that?
/r/MensRights07/06/18 11:44 AM
13

Cutting hair: tragic. They also forgot to add that this didn't happen to all women, only those who made a specific choice. The woman in the picture is obviously unafraid and knows no harm will come to her apart from her hair being cut. For collaborating with nazis!!! A man would be lynched for something like that.
/r/MensRights07/06/18 11:39 AM
41

Most rape is just bad sex She's almost right, she just said it backwards: some women think bad sex is rape.
/r/MensRights31/05/18 12:27 PM
1

My hypothesis is that it’s because of Trump. He is one of the biggest victims of this, not the reason. His haters are so unhinged they are ready and eager to dismantle our societies to remove him from his democratically elected position. Also, this is just a natural consequence of our society letting progressive propaganda go on neigh unchallenged, and letting false accusers get away with it for so long. People are brainwashed to believe that our world is full of rape and mysygyny, and they feel…
/r/MensRights29/05/18 10:20 AM
1

sick and tired to death of both feminism and the Alt/Extreme Right, and it seems there's no such thing as a happy medium anymore when it comes to politics. That's a strange notion considering 99% of conservatives (including Trump and his supporters) are neither alt nor extreme. The same thing can almost be said about lefitsts, but sadly a lot more than 1% of them are quite radical in their views, for example those who treat all conservatives as alt/extreme. I know it might look self serving comi…
/r/MensRights29/05/18 08:47 AM
3

In a specific sense it's very important that she's a mother, namely that she has a stake in the future. Politicians without kids like Merkel or Macron are more dangerous because they don't have to care for the future at all. They also lack the experience of actually having to care for someone, having a responsibility for their well-being beyond a generic 'adults living together' scenario. Being a parent changes you, it makes most people more empathetic, caring, and interested in the future of th…
/r/MensRights29/05/18 06:50 AM
10

Thing is, women's day is characterized by giving extra attention and care to women, so in this sense every other day is women's day as well, since women get a lot more attention and care anyways. The idea that men receive as much care all year as women receive on women's day is insane.
/r/MensRights29/05/18 06:42 AM
4

As a woman you would likely be dominated and humiliated. This is feminist bullshit. People were people back then too, and they loved their loved ones. It's not normal for us men to humiliate our mothers, wives, daughters or sisters. Cruel people do so, but being cruel isn't exclusive to men. The idea that back then women were treated as dirt is ridiculous. Read books written in those days, like Lucrezia Marinella's "The Nobility and Excellence of Women and the Defects and Vices of Men" (telling …
/r/MensRights29/05/18 06:34 AM
15

They want ever more women in higher ed and then they're surprised female student debt is on the rise? Suddenly it's a "problem" because now it affects women? Oh, feminism, you...
/r/MensRights24/05/18 07:20 AM
1

If the foundation was 'progressive' to begin with then this is just leftist idiots infighting, eating each other like they always do. SJW and progressive are practically synonyms nowadays. The days when social progress was something meaningful and positive are long gone.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 12:27 PM
2

Doesn't the west have enough problems already? With men earning less and less, and women forced to become sole/primary breadwinners more and more, even less families will be formed, these will be less stable, even less children will be born than today, fatherlessness will continue to grow with all its side effects (like youth criminality and increased suicide risk), and women will become even more miserable with the increasing responsibilities they will have to carry.
/r/MensRights14/05/18 10:07 AM
1

Fuck her, both literally and figuratively.
/r/MensRights14/05/18 10:03 AM
7

Oh, and I learned the MRM believes women always make false allegations about rape and should never be trusted, so there's a news flash. Should I just say buzz off or should I invest the energy to take you seriously? Let's do both. The MRM 'believes' (although it's not a single entity that could do such a thing, but still) that accusations must be proven before convicting anyone of any crime, which makes the notion of "trusting" the accuser meaningless. It's not a question of trust, it is (or at …
/r/MensRights11/05/18 08:20 AM
2

Trump is right, CNN is the king of fake news. Not that the other progressive mediums are too far behind, but still.
/r/MensRights25/04/18 07:27 AM
-1

And thus feminism will reach the goal it was created to achieve: to sow division between the sexes, to the point where they turn on each other and view the other sex as enemies. You must realize - even if it sounds like a conspiracy theory - that feminism is but an arm of the progressive movement, which was taken over by cultural marxism, and the goal of cultural marxism is to destroy western civilization so their utopia can grow on its ruins. Destroying families and making enemies out of men an…
/r/MensRights25/04/18 06:56 AM
2

And thus feminism will reach the goal it was created to achieve: to sow division between the sexes, to the point where they turn on each other and view the other sex as enemies. You must realize - even if it sounds like a conspiracy theory - that feminism is but an arm of the progressive movement, which was taken over by cultural marxism, and the goal of cultural marxism is to destroy western civilization so their utopia can grow on its ruins. Destroying families and making enemies out of men an…
/r/MensRights25/04/18 06:56 AM
11

By "liberals" they mean progressives, right? No actual liberal would think that mutilating newborn babies is okay, and progressives only think like that because they see muslims and/or jews as protected groups who mustn't be interfered with. Coincidentally this is why you can't trust political parties that are 'liberal', it has become a code word for progressivism.
/r/MensRights25/04/18 06:42 AM
17

If you ever trusted progressive news sources on anything please stop. It's clearly obvious they intentionally lie about all their enemies, and has been for decades. If you thought they only lie about the MRM but are trustworthy about the red pill being mysygynysts, the political right being nazis or even Trump being a sexist/racist you're sorely mistaken, and at this point pretty damn well out of your freakin' mind. The progressive left is a cancer you cannot reason or negotiate with.
/r/MensRights25/04/18 06:37 AM
17

I'd humorously advise you to start following the judge to see how tough her skin is, but we all know how that would end.
/r/MensRights24/04/18 11:22 AM
1

Agreed.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 11:00 AM
1

I would prefer a bipartisan way forward, and it works within the movement, but the political left (the progressives) treat us as an enemy, and we can't do anything about that. There's no way anyone could convince SJWs and leftist politicians that the MRM is not their enemy, even if we purged all the right-wing elements from the MRM. Well, it's basically just an extention of their progressive feminist worldview that views men as the enemies of women/society...
/r/MensRights23/04/18 08:49 AM
2

Since men soend more money on booze than women most bar owners do (or will) realize it's not to their benefit to fuck men over.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 01:36 PM
6

Believe me, you're better off without the government meddling in your rights. If you run to daddy government to protect you it will inevitably bite you in the ass in the long run. Also, if a bar owner thinks it's beneficial for him to turn away men, but not women, it's his business, his rights are "men's rights" too, and if you don't like it you're totally, absolutely free to take your money elsewhere.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 01:29 PM
1

Just wondering if this triggers any of you. Sane people don't get triggered, stop using these idiotic SJW terms or buzz off.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 09:44 AM
1

Is it OK for bars to turn away groups of men? Yes. And it should be okay for any establishment to turn away anybody or any group for any reason. We should strive for maximum liberty with the least amount of government rules and intervention. We don't need the government to force us to be enlightened or whatever, we need it to leave us alone, and then we will vote with our wallets.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 09:41 AM
6

And she should be a feminist as well. In fact we should only send feminist women to Mars. Even better: we should send every single feminist to Mars.
/r/MensRights17/04/18 09:46 AM
6

I would start with Karen Straughan's videos that talk about this subject, but you can also look up the declaration of sentiments as a starting point if you prefer reading to videos.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 01:20 PM
11

Well it's based on a wholesome movement, but it's become lies, is what I would say. Absolutely not, this is the polar opposite of the truth. If you look at the actual history of feminism, the modern version started about 150 years ago with the "declaration of sentiments", which was already full of marxist bullshit, and determined what feminism has later blossomed into. Feminism was designed to be a tool of social destruction, it was created with the express intent of sowing animosity between the…
/r/MensRights13/04/18 01:14 PM
16

The love of truth. Feminism is built on lies, yet it has immense political power in the west, and I find that disturbing. Nothing personal, I wasn't divorce raped, circumcised or accused of anything, I just find political ideologies based on lies abhorrent.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 12:05 PM
3

When you debate with a feminazi Don't. If you really feel the need to do so, then be prepared that no amount of logical arguments can beat a well placed emotional pleading or shaming attempt coming from a wymyn. Well, to address your actual question, most HR personell are women, so it would be really weird if they discriminated against their sisters, right? Apart from this, women of childbearing age are objectively worse employee material than men (because there's a high probability they will le…
/r/MensRights12/04/18 09:37 AM
2

These things should be perfectly legal in both directions. If a firm wants to employ only men/women it's their prerogative and the state should not intervene based only on a political ideology.
/r/MensRights12/04/18 09:32 AM
6

Intersectionalism has eaten the brains of many a leftist, they think people not subscribed to their ideology are all part of a giant interconnected conspiracy of racist, sexist, transphobe nazis. Modern liberalism is a mental illness.
/r/MensRights05/04/18 08:03 AM
13

And of course you could always just tell them at the registration desk that you identify as a womyn. I'd say the best reaction is to ignore every single event or organization that discriminates against men. Simply don't go, don't give your money to SJW fuckwits.
/r/MensRights04/04/18 10:55 AM
3

"Do the things men do, for us." It's totally reasonable for people to have expectations. To call these "gender roles" and say they're oppressive is SJW nonsense. Women with conservative values tend to have conservative expectations, like men opening jars and doors, driving the family car, and so on, ie. fulfilling a masculine role in the family in a general sense. In exchange you can have your own conservative expectations of them, which boil down to fulfilling a feminine role in the family. It'…
/r/MensRights04/04/18 08:56 AM
1

For fuck's sake, Trump is the only politician standing up against the SJW bullshit, and you fuckwits still hate him because the media told you to.
/r/MensRights03/04/18 07:01 AM
-9

Now, had the person giving the presentation been talking about another crime, say murder, would it be acceptable to say that people with black skin commit more murder than people with white skin? I would hope not, and if that ever happened, I would walk out of the room, and hope that the room would followed me. What a fuckin' clown.
/r/MensRights03/04/18 06:58 AM
4

Of course the left thinks that helping poor men in any way, shape or form is a bad thing. Cheers, CNN.
/r/MensRights29/03/18 09:01 AM
1

It is, it’s just discouraged in modern society, and I said I’m all for it, men should have the ability to be the one asked out, bought gifts, taken on dates, be the small spoon Geeeeeeeeez... God help me. First of all modern society all but enforces this role reversal, with the education system teaching feminist values, the family courts favoring women over men and the media pandering to women and bashing men in every way possible. Secondly, men already have the "ability" to be or to do anything…
/r/MensRights28/03/18 12:21 PM
1

am I unique? No, you're just projecting your personal experiences onto society in general in a flawed way, like many other victims of violence or abuse. If my mother abused me should I support male dominance in the household, or should I advocate against estrogen? Also, can you explain to me how you're supporting "female dominance" and equality at the same time? Would you look funny if I said I support both male dominance and equality?
/r/MensRights28/03/18 12:14 PM
19

"Holy Shit!" she said. "I am the patriarchy!" If she'd had an ounce of sense she would've said "Holy shit! The notion of 'patriarchy' is total bullshit, society isn't controlled exclusively by one sex!"
/r/MensRights28/03/18 09:02 AM
-2

Reading the majority of the article I didn't find any evidence (or even a clear accusation) that he actually forced anyone to do anything against their will, it's just hints that he could have or might have. Being 'shady' is not a crime, at least I think the cultural marxist elite didn't make it so yet. Well, the fuck knows really, after a guy was imprisoned for staring through a shop window I'm not sure of anything.
/r/MensRights28/03/18 08:05 AM
8

Contrary to popular belief MGTOW is not a set of principles or ideas, it's an observation that men tend to do their own things, as opposed to women who are herd creatures (so to speak). 'Going your own way' means doing what YOU want to do, following your dreams, spending time on your hobbies, etc. The internet can't tell you what to do for you to be a MGTOW, that would be a contradiction of epic proportions. This means that how you relate to women is also up to you. If your dreams are having a w…
/r/MensRights28/03/18 07:28 AM
4

These are 'shit tests'.
/r/MensRights28/03/18 07:12 AM
2

Well, for all intents and purposes she is an antifeminist, considering she stands for the exact opposite of what feminists generally stand for. She calls herself a feminist only because she was hoodwinked into believing the obvious lie that "feminism only wants equality". She is an egalitarian who thinks feminism is also an egalitarian movement.
/r/MensRights23/03/18 12:13 PM
1

Only if you don't understand either. Feminism is a cultural marxist weapon aimed at western societies, wrapped in a female supremacist movement. MRM is another word for antifeminism, with some added fluff.
/r/MensRights23/03/18 12:05 PM
3

They're afraid that as more white women leave work more white babies will be born. We can't have that, so the government needs to put those white women back in jobs.
/r/MensRights23/03/18 08:54 AM
1

the male perspective was not a part of this discussion The best possible indication of being discriminated against.
/r/MensRights20/03/18 02:16 PM
2

I have only one gripe with this article: Many things were focused on women by default, and while it felt marginalizing, you were always aware that this is how women felt in the world at large, and if you forgot that, you were quickly reminded. Nope. The situation is the same in the real world too, and it has been for ages. It's a feminist lie that women were/are oppressed by men. Western societies were practically always gynocentric as that is what's written in our evolutionary programming as hu…
/r/MensRights19/03/18 09:13 AM
7

Either way it reinforces a gendered binary that leaves people trapped in the expectations of others. It's very inegalitarian. When did MR became a part of the intersectional feminist bullshit cult? What the fuck is a "gendered binary" if not the realization that there are two sexes and two corresponding genders? For the sake of all that's holy please stop using SJW ideas and SJW language, it's not only idiotic but it will also alienate all the sane people in the world from our cause. Men have to…
/r/MensRights10/03/18 08:02 AM
1

You know, relations between the sexes were generally amicable until feminism came along and invented the idea of patriarchal oppression. Things have gotten way worse since then, tons of people were brainwashed with the retarded notion that men and women are classes (in the marxist sense) in competition with each other, feminists have demonized men and lobbied for anti-male laws, etc., and now millions view the other sex with suspicion. What we DO NOT NEED is even more suspicion and combativeness…
/r/MensRights09/03/18 08:20 AM
0

There is a difference between not buying Chris Brown's music (which is fine) and writing articles in the media more than a decade after his altercation with Rihanna insisting he should be unpersoned.
/r/MensRights09/03/18 07:33 AM
1

But I certainly see what's miserable in looking for ways to feel oppressed, and choosing depressing perspectives over nicer ones. Women having a women's day isn't preferential treatment, it's a nice gesture from men that can be used to repair relations between the sexes. And of course there's a men's day too, it's november 19. Wanting to eradicate nice things in the name of equality will never lead to a better existence.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 02:27 PM
1

Not at all. The "gender war" was invented by feminists and it still is a feminist project, we sane people should strive to have a mutually enjoyable relationship between the sexes, including but not limited to celebrating each other, and not looking for opportunities to get offended when the other sex is celebrated. Having less fun and more misery in the name of equality is what feminists do, not us.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 11:57 AM
-1

What an argument, especially considering I didn't say a single word about the efficacy of the vaccine, or vaccines in general. I said there is no HPV epidemic you fuckwit.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 11:36 AM
-3

I will believe there's an HPV epidemic when I see it happening, not when Big Pharma tells me so. The same goes for the vaccine itself: I will believe there's a need for it when someone other than those getting rich by selling it proves it to me. Until then they can sod off, and please stop using the mask of equality to covertly lobby for Big Pharma's interests. This is a medical (scam) issue, not a men's rights one.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 10:28 AM
0

Look, if someone commits a crime we have a justice system to deal with that, it's not up to random SJWs on the internet to decide how people should be punished. One of the pillars of our justice system is the idea that if you pay the fine or do the time then you've been punished enough, and there's no need for vigilante assclowns to torture you ever after, for example by constant unneeded social shaming or sabotaging your career. The very idea that "socially sensitive" individuals (if you catch …
/r/MensRights08/03/18 08:23 AM
16

It's the complete failure of our media that when we should celebrate an actor for receiving an oscar they instead talk about his vengeful ex-wife's unsubstantiated accusations from 17 years ago. Even if those accusations were true they would still have nothing to do with Oldman's acting in a movie that came out last year. It's mind-blowing how some mongoloids think that if someone makes a mistake in his personal life his career should be destroyed forever.
/r/MensRights07/03/18 02:11 PM
2

This is a blatant attack on our culture, the next step of destroying everything that created and sustains western civilization. But don't worry, cultural marxists will surely provide us with better bedtime stories that will bring about better gender roles resulting in a better culture... Any minute now...
/r/MensRights07/03/18 10:15 AM
6

Well, then stop opposing FGM you islamophobe!
/r/MensRights07/03/18 09:01 AM
2

I don't know why the writer of the article taught her kids to reject traits like gentleness, empathy and sensitivity but I've never heard of anyone else who did. Teaching boys to be tough and to avoid looking physically/emotionally weak is not the same thing as telling them to reject empathy, for fuck's sake.
/r/MensRights07/03/18 08:58 AM
3

Many/most men will always support anything women want them to because men are hardwired to make women happy. Yes, this is true even for the openly female supremacist, male-hating ideology that is feminism. Also, any article supporting feminism is bound to be full of shit, why is anyone around here surprised this article is no exception?
/r/MensRights05/03/18 09:41 AM
9

Don't tell me you didn't notice that the modern left intentionally creates confusion all the time against all the groups they consider enemies. It's a way to create guilt by association, to undermine moderates by associating them with radicals, criminals, etc. Didn't you know that the MRM is the same thing as TRP, PUA and MGTOW, or that Elliot Rodger was an MRA (even though he absolutely wasn't)? Don't you know that conservatives are nazis because Trump is liked by someone we say is alt-right? M…
/r/MensRights01/03/18 02:09 PM
11

any concern about men and boys—and the difficulties facing the latter (and their parents) have always been my focus [...] I urged that liberals (progressives) take on this very important initiative. This has never really happened. Well geez, I wonder why the ideological side that wields feminism as a weapon won't show any compassion for those who it treats as enemies in their gender war. It's like urging Black Lives Matter to start helping white people - good luck with that.
/r/MensRights01/03/18 01:51 PM
0

The question is not what society wants from men, it's how you define yourself. I don't give a rat's ass about society's opinion but I do think of myself as a decent human being who helps those weaker than him in times of crisis. And if this coincides with what society wants from me then I still don't give a rat's ass about society, I do my own thing following my own set of values, thank you. I don't act like a decent man with a spine because society brainwashed me into feeling disposable, I do s…
/r/MensRights28/02/18 02:58 PM
0

The idea that there are ideals of the sexes is traditionalist and limiting. The idea that the sexes are the same is a feminist one, and literally retarded. Newsflash: the sexes are different, even psychologically, and no amount of mental masturbation can change this fact. If you don't like the idea of masculinity, FINE, nobody forces it on you, but it exists independently of you even if you deny or hate its existence. The idea that sex imposes personality traits rather than a mix of nature/nurtu…
/r/MensRights27/02/18 02:01 PM
0

For fuck's sake, stop being daft. You don't intervene in crisis situations because you think you're worth less than others, you intervene because you're more capable than others, and that puts a certain responsibility on you. I reckon if your own kids were drowning in a lake you wouldn't try to save them because you're worth just as much as them so you would be a fool to risk yourself for them, right? Some people take some MRA ideas out of context and waaaaay too far, warping those ideas into so…
/r/MensRights27/02/18 01:33 PM
-1

You're right, we should strive for MRA goals. Ie, getting rid of traditional gender roles and sexist double standards. That's literally coming from the feminists' mouth. The very idea that gender roles are bad or that they're forced on people are feminist nonsense. They were retarded enough to think they're smart enough to re-engineer human nature and they failed miserably, so why not copy them and do the same? /s The things you call "traditional gender roles" are based on things you don't under…
/r/MensRights26/02/18 08:38 AM
0

And that's the problem, it's not a "masculine" trait. If a woman sacrifices herself for somebody - did they act like a man or act brave? Look, regardless of what destructive postmodern ideologies want you to believe men and women are different, have different characteristics, and that is fine. There are feminine and masculine things, traits, ideas, and it's okay if you don't care about them, but only idiots argue that these things don't exist. So yeah, sacrificing yourself in defense of anyone b…
/r/MensRights26/02/18 07:38 AM
1

You confuse the government putting more responsibilities on men with men having an inner sense of personal responsibility that is different from women's. The former we fight against but the latter is not only perfectly acceptable (as masculinity is different from femininity) but it's something we should actively strive for. Having a masculine sense of personal responsibility for things and people around you is not necessarily something society imposes on you for its own benefit, it should be a p…
/r/MensRights24/02/18 09:11 AM
1

Look, you can rest assured I find the notion of men being disposable repulsive, but you have widened the definition of it beyond reason. Men being disposable means we're sacrificed in wars and conflicts by the thousands without a second thought. A man having a set of inner moral values that dictates he should help those who are weaker than him is not male disposability. A moral compass saying you should take action instead of hiding away while people are in danger around you is not male disposab…
/r/MensRights24/02/18 08:39 AM
-1

Our cause is that it's okay if a man doesn't want to be tough enough We shouldn't strive for feminist goals, ie. the destruction of masculinity. Of course it's "okay" if you're feminine, it doesn't make you any less of a human being, but for men being feminine shouldn't be made into an ideal. We have a problem thanks to the lack of positive masculine role models, and it cannot be solved by giving boys feminine role models. I don't know what you envision the future to be but I find the idea of a …
/r/MensRights24/02/18 08:34 AM
1

I don't expect you to be, or to do anything, I'm saying that the strong protecting the weak is a masculine ideal, and it damn well should be. When you teach your boys to be brave and to protect those weaker than them it's not about them being disposable, it's about their values and self-respect. There's a 99.99% chance they will never have to sacrifice themselves for anyone, but being willing to do so can give them a sense of healthy masculine pride.
/r/MensRights24/02/18 08:17 AM
6

The Nordic Jewish Communities issued a statement condemning the ban on "the most central rite" in their faith. If the most central rite of your religion is cutting off newborns' foreskins you can fuck right off with your barbaric set of superstitions. Religion is supposed to be about spiritual awakening for the self, not mutilating your children.
/r/MensRights23/02/18 08:25 AM
-1

He's kinda' boorish but he's also kinda' right. We can't let ourselves be emasculated in the process of achieving equal treatment by the government. Protecting the weak is a positive masculine trait we should strive for, unless we want to turn into the androgynous creatures feminists want us to be. We should teach our sons to be brave and act like heroes, instead of cowering little bitches, because life will crush them anyway if they don't have a spine. I'm sad to see so many people ready and wi…
/r/MensRights23/02/18 07:56 AM
2

Probably never. It's in our evolutionary programming to pander to women and to view men with suspicion, especially those who complain about their hardships. Most people are driven by their feelings wrt subjects like this, and 'feeling' is more or less just a code word for an emotional driving force coming from our subconscious that we do not consciously understand - ie. evolutionary programming. This is why feminists have it so easy and MRAs have it so tough. When women complain men and women al…
/r/MensRights21/02/18 08:17 AM
4

The next step will be claiming sexism and discrimination based on the distribution of medals, so the entire system will be restructured to give out participation awards for identity groups instead of rewarding actual performance. They did this to the Oscars already...
/r/MensRights21/02/18 07:25 AM
6

It's an obvious trend now that Hollywood uses accusations of sexism/racism as a get out of jail free card against any type of criticism. Progressivism ruins everything.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 06:55 PM
1

Depends on what kind of scientist they are. God save us from the types of Bill Nye, or anyone from gender/social/anyotherbullshit studies. I wouldn't even trust those who work in fields that are politicized (like climatology or big pharma). Hm. On second thought I'm not even sure it's a good idea to let scientists into politics, considering politics is a totally different business than science. Someone might be a very good chemist and at the same time a total idiot wrt politics.
/r/MensRights15/02/18 12:56 PM
1

People wonder why I tend to trust some media sources and distrust others, well, the ones with leftist bias keep on lying about me all the time, why the f_ck would I trust a single word they say? In fact I'm more inclined to believe the exact opposite of what leftist sources like the BBC and CNN say, it's almost always a lot closer to the actual truth.
/r/MensRights15/02/18 12:49 PM
2

You have to be braindead to believe accusations of sexual misconduct that surface during a political election. When Trump said he will sue his accusers they disappeared like morning dew in the sunlight. Wait, don't tell me you also believed that the phrase they LET YOU grab them by the pussy was referring to sexual assault...
/r/MensRights15/02/18 12:17 PM
1

how polarizing Trump is Trump is not polarizing at all, the people who fill the streets and the media with their blind unreasonable hatred of him are. Think about it for a sec, when some people railed against Obama you didn't say "Obama is polarizing", you said his haters were hateful. Also, since feminism is clearly a movement of the modern left the only hope of the MRM is the right, really. I pity the classic leftists and left-leaning liberals who can't find their places in the current situati…
/r/MensRights15/02/18 11:42 AM
3

I probably hate the most when feminists hide their feminist credentials and pretend that they're just random people caring for women, for example in articles about prostitution or human trafficking. They write the most outrageous anti-male bullshit and the readers just nod and recite misandric stereotypes like how all men are probable rapists - except for themselves, of course, because they're the exceptionally enlightened ones who protect and serve women.
/r/MensRights06/02/18 03:00 PM
1

It's pretty revealing that in the first picture both of them seem to be happy: the woman makes an effort to please her husband, it works, and both of them feel better for it. In the second picture the woman looks down on the guy and looks generally derisive, while he looks humiliated and browbeaten into doing something against his will, destroying his human dignity in the process. Modern feminism in a picture.
/r/MensRights29/01/18 01:31 PM
5

For fuck's sake, stop trying to validate and legitimize feminism, which was a destructive marxist experiment from the get-go. African women fighting for other women in Africa is not "real feminism". Real feminism is Andrea Dworkin, Anita Sarkeesian and Amanda Marcotte vomiting their mental illnesses all over the place, trying to sow animosity between men and women, breaking up the traditional family, and destroying social cohesion. If you tie them to honorable things other people do, it will jus…
/r/MensRights29/01/18 01:15 PM
3

Rights are not "oppressed", and neither are men (or women for that matter), but some rights that men have on paper are routinely ignored, or are under attack by feminism, like the right to a fair trial facing your accusers & the witnesses, the presumption of innocence, equal treatment by the courts and the state, and so on. For example it would be hard to explain why men get custody of their children only ~16% of the time, or why feminists lobby to reverse the burden of proof in rape cases. Ther…
/r/MensRights29/01/18 01:08 PM
3

What a disgusting shitshow - the question itself is a lie, for starters.
/r/MensRights26/01/18 10:52 AM
3

Were these female comedians? If so, we badly don't need any more of them.
/r/MensRights26/01/18 10:49 AM
1

We are polite people conditioned to expect decency and fairness from our social systems. Many find it mind-boggling when they find out that these systems aren't fair, and that they can do nothing about it, because most people either don't care, consider discrimination against men unimportant or justified, or profit from the unfairness. What are we waiting for? For society to react to our complaints, but since that isn't going to happen in the near future, we're waiting for the revolution to star…
/r/MensRights26/01/18 10:27 AM
15

Nobody "confuses" the MRM with anything, they intentionally muddy the waters to discredit us.
/r/MensRights26/01/18 10:11 AM
2

70% is a laughable estimate, it's probably upwards of 95%.
/r/MensRights24/01/18 02:39 PM
1

Wikipedia is a progressive shitfest, it was never reliable on anything political or ideological. Only refer to it in matters of no political importance.
/r/MensRights18/01/18 12:44 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter