TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Kapten_Surstromming Archive

View 0 posts and 31 comments by Kapten_Surstromming on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Isn't the whole point of "age of consent" that it doesn't matter whether or not a child consents to sex because they are not mentally developed enough to make that decision?
/r/MensRights19/09/19 11:33 AM
1

"Pandora's box"? Sounds pretty negative.
/r/MensRights13/09/19 06:23 PM
7

I highly doubt that heterosexuality is necessary for the further existence of the patriarchy. The only reason that patriarchal systems are the norm anyway is that women can only succesfully breed every 9 months while men can do so practically uninterruptedly. But the spread of birth control didn't make patriarchy go belly-up. Because the amount of sex a man has doesn't have a massive influence on his social power anymore since 20000 years. Patriarchy doesn't depend on factors like heterosexualit…
/r/MensRights12/09/19 06:48 PM
37

"Should Iceland ban human sacrifice, it would become impossible for satanists to raise their families there." I mean, what are they even saying? Their entire argument is baically that the ban is bad because nazis would like it. They would rather withhold the right to own your very body from innocent children than seeing nazis enjoy something. Honestly, if nazis profit from the ban, then so be it. To me, damaging your political enemy is less important than upholding human rights. If there are Jew…
/r/MensRights12/09/19 06:24 PM
1

"Should Iceland ban human sacrifice, it would become impossible for satanists to raise their families there." I mean, what are they even saying? Their entire argument is baically that the ban is bad because nazis would like it. They would rather withhold the right to own your very body from innocent children than seeing nazis enjoy something. Honestly, if nazis profit from the ban, then so be it. To me, damaging your political enemy is less important than upholding human rights. If there are Jew…
/r/MensRights12/09/19 06:19 PM
3

I would have expected many of the comments to ask why OP's wife refuses other types of birth control, since that's really what makes or breaks the situation (which OP conveniently left out). But apparently it's safe to assume that every method of birth control is more uncomfortable than using condoms.
/r/MensRights12/09/19 05:55 PM
5

Well, the foreskin does have a function (as a lubricant). And if there are people who are okay with having been circumcised, then I am happy for them. But I want those people to still realize that circumcision violates babies' bodily integrity. only rarely serves a goal that would justify its means. goes against the seperation between church and state. is a social justice issue.
/r/MensRights04/09/19 08:56 PM
8

Which I might have noticed by taking a closer look. Forgot that religiously motivated circumcision is still legal in the UK.
/r/MensRights04/09/19 12:57 PM
22

If America started to see circumcision as the barbaric practice that it is, the pharmacist would have gotten the penalty she deserves. But as of now, her only wrongdoing is breach of trust and she got off with way too few consequences.
/r/MensRights04/09/19 12:44 PM
8

Reversal of a woman buying perfume and splashing it on herself while a bunch of peeping toms spy on her probably wouldn't entice a woman to buy the product.. unless perhaps she used it to triumphantly spray the men with it, causing them blindness or something https://youtu.be/-6jK_Nzb9HQ
/r/MensRights16/08/19 05:10 AM
12

How to date black people when you hate black people.
/r/MensRights16/08/19 04:54 AM
3

Groundbreaking study reveals that animals are not treated to the same standards as humans.
/r/MensRights16/08/19 04:51 AM
1

Do you have any strong feelings about raw male nature too?
/r/MGTOW19/07/19 02:36 AM
1

This is just a random little thing spawned from sexist hate that will never catch on. It has already gotten more attention than it should, in a few months nobody will even remember this chair.
/r/MGTOW17/07/19 11:57 PM
1

How did you find out how all women are? I always found it hard since there are literally billions of them.
/r/MGTOW17/07/19 11:51 PM
1

But does that not only apply when you are... you know... breastfeeding?
/r/MensRights13/07/19 05:48 PM
0

Interesting that you call it "killing his balls" considering that chemical castration is perfectly reversible once you stop administering antiaphrodisiacs (or "poison" as you put it in a formal and unbiased fashion). That's like saying "killing a woman's ovaries with poison and hormones is little different than cutting them out of her body" when referring to taking birth control pills. But of course, the obtuse buffoon is me and not the guy whose argument has the finesse and formality of a Donal…
/r/MensRights13/07/19 05:46 PM
1

Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, Indiana, Tennessee, Mississippi, Arkansas, Wyoming, Utah and Arizona all consider showing female nipples lewd and indecent.
/r/MensRights13/07/19 05:29 PM
2

Then maybe something like "castrating half of the population would be a huge damage to personal freedom that achieves practically nothing" can be polished into a nice argument.
/r/MensRights13/07/19 07:06 AM
0

The article mentioned chemical castration, not that any tissue is supposed to be cut off.
/r/MensRights13/07/19 07:02 AM
-2

If the great beholder of wisdom knows the correct definition of the relevant terminus, then please, enlighten me, o he who knows a thousand things.
/r/MensRights13/07/19 05:19 AM
-3

You mean when someone does not conform to the social category that is generally associated with their biological gender?
/r/MensRights13/07/19 05:01 AM
2

Even the most progressive countries on earth still suffer from gender inequality, so I have no better tip than Scandinavia, probably. The Swedes often have their shit together.
/r/MensRights13/07/19 04:50 AM
-3

Where does mutilation come in?
/r/MensRights13/07/19 04:43 AM
17

Surprised that the title didn't say "seduced" again.
/r/MensRights13/07/19 04:38 AM
7

I am still baffled by the fact that circumcisions which are not medically required are actually legal.
/r/MensRights13/07/19 04:36 AM
5

Holy shit, your own parents? That's fucked up!
/r/MensRights13/07/19 04:31 AM
1

Because we still mostly live by the stereotype that men pursue women and not the other way around. A poor person trying to to get with a rich person is aiming way out of their league. If a rich person tries to get with a poor person however, they've obviously made up their mind and are willing to be generous toward the poor one.
/r/MensRights13/07/19 04:25 AM
1

So showing your breasts to others is not illegal unless it occurs specifically at a work place? Sounds like indecent exposure to me either way.
/r/MensRights13/07/19 04:20 AM
2

Just so we don't have to go through every scenario: if it's not on purpose, it's not sexual harassment and if you can convince others that it was not on purpose, they will see it the same way.
/r/MensRights13/07/19 04:17 AM
4

I think we have to know more about the whole discussion. Where does "If you want to prevent abortion" come from? Are you talking about people who demand sterilisation for all men or people who just want vasectomies to be more accessible?
/r/MensRights13/07/19 04:12 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter