TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

KarYotypeStereotype Archive

View 2 posts and 205 comments by KarYotypeStereotype on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

re: FeminismKarYotypeStereotype/r/MensRights28/10/14 09:46 PM
1

re: FeminismKarYotypeStereotype/r/MensRights28/10/14 09:33 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

No, this is Patrick.
/r/MensRights12/03/16 12:58 PM
1

Fine, but that's tangential to the point I was making. /u/therellikofthenight said that the reason escorts are illegal is because they don't pay taxes, which is putting the cart before the horse. If that were the case, there would merely be laws against tax evasion rather than the act of prostitution itself.
/r/TheRedPill08/03/16 09:25 PM
2

Perception of pain is not the same thing as pain itself, and it's not the same thing as injury. The fetus will still withdraw from noxious stimuli, as will any living organism, and one does not have to consciously acknowledge an injury in order for us to say he has sustained it. It's possible to injure a comatose patient, for example, or a plant. Killing is simply the result of a fatal injury, which is precisely what abortion is - a fatal insult to a developing fetus. This has nothing to do with…
/r/MensRights08/03/16 09:22 PM
2

Escorts can't pay taxes because they're illegal, not the other way around. If it were legal to open a brothel, you can bet Uncle Sam would be collecting. It's just that women run the show in the US, and prostitution exposes just how inflated the value of pussy is in this country. There's a reason we all buy milk at a grocery store instead of buying a cow and keeping it at our house. If cows ran the show, they'd outlaw bottled milk.
/r/TheRedPill01/03/16 06:14 PM
2

I don't see how any of it is any different than traditional courtship where the man pays for the date, or a marriage where the man is the breadwinner. Across the animal kingdom, males pay for sex some way or another. Biology even has a concept known as the nuptial gift, which is a literal payment for sex. The fact is that women are the gatekeepers of sex, and it's their biological imperative to use it to try to secure resources either acutely ('prostitution' or other transactional sex) or in per…
/r/TheRedPill01/03/16 06:11 PM
-2

Yeah how is it her right to kill the thing but not to injure it? You sort of have to do the latter to accomplish the former.
/r/MensRights01/03/16 05:27 PM
18

Med student here. Steroids are a no go. This is not mere muscle wasting, it's a muscular dystrophy, meaning the body simply cannot make the right molecules to keep muscles intact. Anabolics will just increase your production of ineffective molecules which will not hold up. All you'll get from roids is tiny balls and heart disease. Prolia is also expensive as fuck and not indicated for FSH Dystrophy, so no insurance will cover it and most likely no doctor will be comfortable writing it for you an…
/r/TheRedPill15/12/15 12:17 PM
8

This "who's the ugliest" poll strikes me as beta. Can't put my finger on it exactly, but what does any man have to gain from participating in something like this? Not exactly in compliance with the 48 laws. It's fine to think she's ugly and to know you'd never hit that, but voicing that can only serve to make you look petty and small.
/r/TheRedPill05/12/15 01:09 PM
1

There is a fundamental difference between the genders here. Men have always been as disposable as the sperm they shoot, and women have always been as valuable as the womb with which they gestate a new human being. Men have always been the worker bees, the cannon fodder, and women have always been the queen bees with an army of men to protect them. Ever it was and ever it shall be; the only difference is that now women don't like men getting any perks at all for being the cannon fodder of society…
/r/MensRights01/11/15 02:03 PM
2

Those comments are fucking dreadful. This generation is out of its goddamn mind with romanticism and entitlement.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 01:58 PM
1

I have had the good fortune to be naturally talented my entire life, that much is true. I admit that my perceptions are shaped by my own life experience. Perhaps I underestimate the plight of the below average male, but I still believe that most men can better themselves and become at least modestly valuable and attractive to at least some subset of women. The ugly female, on the other hand, can only rely on the deception of cosmetics and the push up bra, and those rather cheap tricks can only g…
/r/TheRedPill23/10/15 01:58 AM
1

I didn't say "most", but I think many is fair. Red pill hyperbole aside, there really are a lot do women out there who are not the typical vacuous slut. They just aren't more attractive, and in fact are often less so. It's the age old tale of the highly successful woman who has nothing but cats to come home to.
/r/TheRedPill23/10/15 01:49 AM
1

Or call her and tell her those things but don't put them in writing.
/r/TheRedPill22/10/15 12:39 AM
2

Many women do use their brains, invent things, have careers, etc., and that's great, but it doesn't make them better wives or mothers. That's the rub. Women should focus on that stuff if they want to, but they should do it with their eyes open and without the deception that they can have it all.
/r/TheRedPill21/10/15 11:29 PM
50

And I think, at the end of the day, this phenomenon is what many women are grasping at when they refer to the patriarchy. Women are not oppressed by men as they claim, but it is assuredly better to be male, because men have the chance to continue to become more valuable right up until senility. Women, regardless of what they do with their lives, at some point hit the wall. I think they witness men becoming happier, more confident, more fulfilled, more comfortable as their lives go on, while wome…
/r/TheRedPill21/10/15 08:46 PM
4

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brian_Banks_(American_football)
/r/MensRights20/10/15 11:13 AM
1

In the middle of season 2 right now. Never seen it before but I'm sold. Incredible show.
/r/TheRedPill17/10/15 05:07 PM
4

Not to mention she obviously doesn't know what the word "metastasize" means.
/r/TheRedPill17/10/15 04:42 PM
5

Poorly designed study that's likely not reproducible, and a dog shit article to boot. This is just some woman bitching and whining about the results. Anyway, in my experience, I would absolutely trust male anger more than female, simply because I have known so many women to get angry about stupid, inane shit. The men I know don't get angry easily, and when they do, there's probably a good reason. The women I know, on the other hand, are quick to anger as well as every other possible emotion, and…
/r/MensRights11/10/15 11:38 AM
99

Yeah, any girl who wants to get in the car with this random guy on the street has already demonstrated an utter lack of judgment and self control. Can you imagine any of these women raising your child? Jesus, makes me shudder. I feel so bad for these boyfriends left standing on the street, but then again if an experience like this isn't enough to change your worldview I'm not sure these men can be helped.
/r/TheRedPill08/10/15 10:52 PM
1

I disagree that incitement should be illegal. Those who would carry out the actions you suggest are solely responsible for their behavior. The consequences of allowing government to determine what counts as violent speech are far worse to me than allowing all speech.
/r/TheRedPill07/10/15 07:07 PM
1

It's not a threat, first of all, and for it to be incitement, there has to be real potential for others to act based on it, which I don't see in this case. If she gave an impassioned diatribe to an angry, axe-wielding crowd, sure, but this is literally a couple dozen letters on Twitter. What's more, just because incitement is currently illegal doesn't mean the law is a good one. It's still counter to free speech. Killing white men, or anyone for that matter, is already illegal and carries the he…
/r/TheRedPill07/10/15 09:57 AM
1

It wouldn't incite anything other than hatred of the person who wrote the tag, and the concept of "hate speech" is just an arbitrary way for the left to suppress opinions it doesn't like.
/r/TheRedPill07/10/15 09:50 AM
100

Why would we oppose free speech here? She's an idiot, but bringing charges seems ridiculous. Let her say her stupid shit and let the world realize how stupid she is.
/r/TheRedPill06/10/15 06:43 PM
5

Ah I see. The satire was lost on me.
/r/MensRights05/10/15 10:24 PM
4

All women are abusive? Come on, dude.
/r/MensRights05/10/15 10:10 PM
1

I'm not so sure about that. I'm a US medical student, so I do know what I'm talking about at least a little bit. The Indian MBBS's I've worked with are solid. Not always the greatest with patients, but they know their shit inside and out. Med school in India must be doing something right, because these guys are sharp. Second, it's fucking hard to get a US residency spot as a foreign medical graduate. You have to be pretty good. Maybe the reason I think highly of Indian grads is that I've mostly …
/r/TheRedPill03/10/15 06:40 PM
8

Whites, Asians, and Indians had to earn it. Blacks, Hispanics, and women in general didn't have to be as good.
/r/TheRedPill03/10/15 10:26 AM
0

The point that everyone glosses over is that intubation is not part of circumcision. We are missing some important info as to why this kid was intubated in the first place. If he simply underwent routine circumcision, he would not have been intubated and therefore not have died. That's why I'm saying the death is not medically directly attributable to the circumcision but to anesthesia and ventilation.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 12:57 AM
1

This is exactly the way I feel about it too. If you are against circumcision, this is not the way to advocate for it. The protestors are just making wild and inflammatory claims and accosting random physicians. I can't support that. Not enthused about what the doc said but also not surprised - I get the sense she was just responding in kind to the stuff that was getting yelled at her.
/r/MensRights23/09/15 01:44 AM
-3

I know I'm going to incur downvotes, but this kid's problems have nothing to do with circumcision. Mistakes were made during intubation and drug dosing, and I frankly don't understand why they needed to intubate a 6 month old for circumcision. This is a procedure that is usually done with local anesthetic, and if sedation was required, they could have just done some midazolam. What happened here was bizarre medical malpractice, and not really an example of the danger of circumcision.
/r/MensRights23/09/15 01:34 AM
5

Meh. I'm not particularly impressed. These protesters were pretty ridiculous IMO, and I'm not shocked that some random pediatrician didn't respond well to being accosted by them.
/r/MensRights22/09/15 11:38 PM
1

I was being a bit hyperbolic, but in general, yes. It's also true that very few men develop any substance, either, but these men can't get laid. Really, really think about the average American young adult. Most of them don't do anything but feed the me-monster.
/r/TheRedPill17/09/15 10:35 AM
98

Netflix, social media, party, and fuck. Very few develop skills, hobbies, or passions beyond this.
/r/TheRedPill16/09/15 01:47 PM
1

Yeah, that's what I'm saying. The girl might be stupid, but mentally ill? That's a stretch.
/r/TheRedPill15/09/15 08:43 PM
18

My strategy is to abandon the desire to have a relationship. Women who can give you anything beyond physical pleasure are indeed extremely rare, and so I'm just simply not looking for that anymore. Now I associate with women purely for sex, and frankly spending time with them otherwise is either neutral or mildly unpleasant compared to spending time with my male friends. If the physicality were removed, I would not spend any of my time or energy on association with women. Sex is still fun though…
/r/TheRedPill15/09/15 04:45 PM
7

God it's so funny to hear them ramble on about their serious jobs and YOLO and all that shit. They get right up to the edge of admitting that trying to live like a man makes them miserable and that what they really want is to submit. They don't quite get to the conclusion but that language is so tortured you can see the reality bleeding through it.
/r/TheRedPill15/09/15 10:49 AM
12

Yeah, sure, but are we talking about what's right, or are we just playing the same game as the feminists?
/r/MensRights15/09/15 10:43 AM
1

Side note, I'm not sure you know what the word "preclude" means.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 02:24 AM
34

Dude says he consented to this. End of story, as far as I'm concerned. He has an easy case if he wanted to press it, but he clearly doesn't. Id say the same thing if it were a woman who claimed to have consented.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 02:23 AM
2

Ha yeah I am a med student. Familiar with the B52, though it doesn't work quite as well when the combo is Benadryl, Benadryl, and Ethanol, which appears to be what this broad took. OP said something about running from chicks with psych problems though, which is what i was getting at. Benadryl is not a controller med for anything psychiatric.
/r/TheRedPill15/09/15 12:47 AM
3

Since when is Benadryl a psychiatric med?
/r/TheRedPill14/09/15 11:23 PM
1

I'd be pissed. Nobody is saying what the kid did was a good idea. Surely there's a middle ground between charging the kid with assault and excusing the transgression entirely.
/r/TheRedPill14/09/15 10:48 PM
1

Yeah, sure. I'm only elaborating as the comment above me asked for. This isn't gospel truth, it's the view that was expressed two comments above.
/r/MensRights12/09/15 08:00 PM
2

Men have always been second class. Women have always been the societal priority because of their greater value in reproduction. It's always been easier to be a woman than a man, in general, because society has always made an effort to protect women at the cost of men. Women and children first, chivalry, legal culpability for female crimes being assigned to their male partners, etc. It just feels more like a raw deal now than ever before for a few reasons. First, the government is extracting prov…
/r/MensRights12/09/15 02:04 PM
15

Smarter men are deciding getting your dick wet isn't worth the bullshit anymore. Also has to do with the notion that institutions of higher education are breeding the female victim mentality, and the women that educated men encounter are therefore riskier prospects.
/r/MensRights12/09/15 12:54 PM
1

Yes, I can read. Are you under the impression that I believe they whipped out their dicks on the field? I don't know what else to say other than what I've already said. If this were an accidental depiction of female anatomy, it would be criticized the same way. This is not a men's rights issue at all.
/r/MensRights08/09/15 09:58 AM
0

What a shit post. It's not socially acceptable to display genitals at an event like this. They'd be under the same criticism if they accidentally showed boobs or a vagina. This has nothing to do with men's rights.
/r/MensRights07/09/15 09:37 PM
2

I don't understand what she means by saying society makes her buy sanitary products. I thought the point was to prevent bleeding all over yourself, especially since she later complains about the cost of buying new underwear in the event of a spill. Where exactly is this a social issue rather than a biological one?
/r/MensRights07/09/15 09:26 PM
3

Any woman who prefers a female clinician is always free to request one, but a government mandate is not in the best interest of patients as it decreases the available nursing resources available to tend to a given patient population. Banning all males from practicing obstetrics is similarly ill advised, since all that it will accomplish is to reduce the number of practicing obstetricians and therefore ultimately worsen outcomes for patients.
/r/MensRights04/09/15 01:11 PM
1

I can't make it through more than a minute of this. She could be reciting Shakespeare and her petulant whine would still be too much for me.
/r/MensRights04/09/15 11:48 AM
3

Time to jump ship, mate. This chick is crazy.
/r/MensRights01/09/15 10:44 PM
8

I don't think that really happens in minimum security female prisons. I'd just as soon have her die and just be rid of her.
/r/MensRights01/09/15 10:40 PM
1

So, to be clear, its up to a judge to subjectively decide when each of us is allowed to have sex, ex post facto? How would anyone know they're in the clear? You'd be risking a rape charge whenever you had sex with anybody. The alternative is to do some sort of permit ahead of time, but I really don't like the idea of having to appeal to Uncle Sam for the right to fuck.
/r/MensRights22/08/15 11:19 AM
1

Hearts and minds, eh?
/r/MensRights22/08/15 12:55 AM
1

I see what you did here...
/r/MensRights22/08/15 12:48 AM
1

Are you arguing that statutory rape shouldn't be illegal? What kind of policy would you substitute? What if the kid had been 13? 12? 10? 8? At some point it clearly is beyond the capacity of the kid to say no to an adult. I'm fine with the statutory laws we have now, so long as they're enforced equally.
/r/MensRights22/08/15 12:46 AM
1

I don't think it's fear. I think they've just found that regardless of their situation, finding some issue or policy where they can play the victim usually gives them a strong position. If there was no dress code and they all showed up wearing bikinis, they'd be complaining about how the boys are sexualizing and objectifying them through stare-rape. It doesn't matter what the issue is or how reasonable the current approach. Playing the victim gives you power in today's society.
/r/MensRights21/08/15 11:22 PM
8

It's got nothing to do with that. It's a matter of decorum. This is a learning environment, not a nightclub. Or do you think women ought to be able to come to school in body paint and pasties? How about at work? In the court room? On the floor of the U.S. Senate? If you think it's some kind of oppression that we generally frown upon bikinis and banana hammocks in places where professional conduct is expected, I don't know what to say. Sometimes it seems this generation just wants to smash all st…
/r/MensRights21/08/15 09:59 PM
9

Yeah! Be a man, and go find a woman who doesn't respect you and buy her a house.
/r/TheRedPill19/08/15 12:56 AM
6

Not a whole more explaining I can do. In the US, a paternity test does not automatically get you out of child support. There are countless cases of men who continue to be held responsible for child support despite having proven that the child is not theirs. Just google "child support despite paternity test" and you'll get an idea.
/r/TheRedPill16/08/15 06:54 PM
19

If you read the comments on the update, there are a bunch telling him he doesn't need screenshots of her texts and Facebook messages, because ultimately a paternity test will save him... This is just about the worst advice you could give, since in the US a paternity test does not get you out of child support. Proof of this girl's intent will go much farther in the court room.
/r/TheRedPill16/08/15 12:42 PM
1

Without seeing the kid's labs, I can't be sure, but I suspect that the author is writing some things that may not be true. In general, you can't tell a 16 month old girl apart from a 16 month old boy by looking at hormone levels. Both males and females of that age have the same normal ranges of FSH and testosterone, and their range for LH only differs slightly (females 0-4, males 0.3-6.0). I have no idea how the author came to the conclusion that the kid was hormonally, because to my knowledge t…
/r/MensRights15/08/15 09:35 PM
1

This is not true. Throughout the 80s and into the 90s, feminization surgery was still the recommendation. Things didn't really start to change until around 1997, based on the story of a particular patient called David Reimer. Limits on the ability of parents to consent to infant intersex surgery were imposed in 1999. It really has only been the last 10-15 years that we have started to strongly recommend deferring surgery in most cases, and even then, it remains controversial. I can't say whether…
/r/MensRights15/08/15 02:37 PM
2

As I have tried to communicate, these issues are multifaceted. It sounds like this child had an undescended testicle as well as some ovotesticular tissue, and both of these pose significant risk for malignancy. Specifically, the testicular portion of the ovotesticular tumor is high risk and must be removed. So what would you have had the physicians do? They opted to feminize, since testicular tissue had to be removed anyway, and we saw how that worked. They could have chosen to masculinize, whic…
/r/MensRights15/08/15 02:26 PM
1

Video and audio, mate. Your lawyer can decide if you need them when push comes to shove.
/r/TheRedPill15/08/15 12:41 PM
10

This shit is all so stupid. Such a law shouldn't exist. If I want to have a men-only event, I ought to be allowed. Women should also be free to do their own thing. Equality doesn't mean every single fucking thing has to have exact proportionate demographic representations of every race and sex.
/r/MensRights15/08/15 12:23 PM
1

I mention gender dysphoria because there is quite a bit of overlap with intersex disorders. Many children with disordered sexual differentiation will later experience gender dysphoria. The ones that do the best tend to be those who have disorders with predictable gender identities. CAH tends to be the easiest to manage in my experience. On the other end of the spectrum, though, is partial androgen insensitivity. Unlike complete AIS, this disorder is extremely heterogenous, and even if we wait fo…
/r/MensRights15/08/15 12:10 PM
5

Kind of. True hermaphrodites are male, but this is not the only intersex disorder. In fact, it's by far the least common. Much more common are things like Androgen Insensitivity and Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia, which are common causes of genital ambiguity. There are many more etiologies but these two are probably the most well known.
/r/MensRights15/08/15 12:29 AM
14

Med student here. This is how intersex disorders used to be treated. Nobody was trying to be shitty - this was genuinely thought to be in the best interest of the child and parents, both medically and psychosocially. Before all of the transgender pub, most parents wanted a discrete gender assignment for their child because of the stigma and awkwardness of sending a kid with gender nonconformity to school among normally gendered peers, etc. Additionally, depending on the disorder, it's possible t…
/r/MensRights15/08/15 12:27 AM
2

Female physicians do far fewer procedures and surgeries than males, and these make up the bulk of malpractice cases. It's easier to sue a doctor who actually physically did something and got a poor outcome rather than a poor outcome from a chronic disease treated medically, which is largely what women tend to do.
/r/MensRights13/08/15 11:11 PM
4

That's because PMS and IBS are real diagnoses that are on the differential for cases of abdominal distention and pain, while man flu is a made up term used solely to antagonize men and doesn't belong in the vocabulary of a healthcare provider. Misdiagnosis is not the same thing as misogyny, and it doesn't make for a fair comparison with what is apparent misandry. I'm a 3rd year med student, btw, so i do know a thing or two about this topic.
/r/MensRights13/08/15 03:47 AM
33

That's the most ridiculous part. If I weighed 250, she wouldn't want to fuck me - I'd be one of the puke-inducing guys. But if she, shorter and female, weighs 250, it's society that's got the problem.
/r/TheRedPill13/08/15 02:44 AM
7

They're right that women are holding out and see the vast majority of men as below average, but they've neglected to mention that men have less interest in marriage as well, for the many reasons of which we are all deeply familiar.
/r/MensRights09/08/15 12:34 AM
6

If they're sending first world women, yeah, it's over before it started. If I were running that thing I'd pick a bunch of smart fit guys and a bunch of submissive Thai women.
/r/TheRedPill04/08/15 02:03 AM
5

I think he's the smartest guy out there. What does he lose by sending his wife to mars? If his marriage is average, and statistically it is, his wife makes his life harder, not easier. This is a way out that doesn't involve a divorce settlement, and he gets to look like a feminist hero. Win win, in my book. If she doesn't go, he supported her and looks like a great guy, for however little that's worth. If she actually does go, he wins the jackpot.
/r/TheRedPill04/08/15 02:01 AM
64

And the other obvious point, which is that we men have no choice in what we wear to the office. We wear wool slacks, an undershirt, a long sleeve shirt, a tie, and a jacket. Women can wear pretty much whatever they want. Only one gender here has the freedom to adjust their attire for the temperature, and yet somehow the air conditioner is the sexist part of all of this.
/r/TheRedPill04/08/15 01:08 AM
11

I don't think it's a logical thing. I think they're just instinctively repulsed by low status men. That's why they oppose cat calling and use words like creepy. They are repulsed and afraid because that's their biology. Edit: what I mean is that she's not thinking "this guy thinks I'm in his league, how offensive." She's just feeling negative feelings. That's as far as that goes. Discomfort, and nothing more. Can't blame her, as she's designed to feel that way. (But legislating based on her disc…
/r/TheRedPill03/08/15 10:15 PM
21

So men have to wear suits, women can wear whatever they damn well please, and the AC being set too low for shorts is the sexist part? Please.
/r/MensRights03/08/15 10:09 PM
13

I wish that fat bitch had gotten decked. I always used to think hitting women was wrong, but that cow isn't going to learn any other way. Fully deserving of any degree of physical punishment in my opinion.
/r/TheRedPill03/08/15 02:51 AM
13

Got a good chuckle out of that. This broad is a head case. All of my least favorite female traits concentrated into one petulant loon.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 01:19 AM
1

The other feminist incongruity that makes no sense is their stance on transgenderism. If gender is a made up social construct, what exactly does it mean to be transgender? If feminine and masculine are meaningless terms forced on us by the patriarchy, what does switching between the two entail exactly? The whole thing is ludicrous. The only way their avid support of transgenderism makes any sense is if they also acknowledge that there are two discreet genders for someone to attempt to switch bet…
/r/TheRedPill30/07/15 12:41 AM
9

Ugh this is not about men's rights, this is just a big lament of "why can't men be women too?" No mention of any of the specific rights that women have that we don't, no mention of the numerous ways we are taken advantage of by society.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 01:52 PM
11

100% if you consider that the shaft isn't exposed until the foreskin is removed. Come on, guys, let's not exaggerate. We don't have to pretend our dicks are being halved for circumcision to be objectionable. Female circumcision doesn't remove the majority of female genital tissue either, for that matter. Valuable tissue is being removed without consent, and at that point it doesn't matter how much tissue we're talking about.
/r/MensRights25/07/15 12:06 PM
4

I don't get it. If both parties are to remain faithful, why does that mean that it's the man controlling the woman's sexuality but not the other way around? The expectation runs both ways; it's not unfair, and it's not like the terms are not known beforehand.
/r/MensRights20/07/15 04:15 AM
24

The point here is not to protect anyone, it's to make it easier to prosecute men. If having a signed form is now the expectation, yet women are still permitted to withdraw consent at any time without actually saying no or resisting, having a signed form means nothing, but not having a signed form means it was rape. This solves the evidentiary problem of the next day rape accusation for the feminists - if you don't have a signed form, it's evidence that you didn't have consent and are guilty of r…
/r/TheRedPill12/07/15 10:52 PM
6

I'm a med student, currently stuck in pretty much the exact situation you've mentioned. Not much of a social life, hardly any time to even work out. Med school can be pretty dry, mate.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/15 11:58 AM
1

Read the comments on this site. Absolutely nobody is on this guy's side, even though we have clear video evidence that verifies the woman was the aggressor.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 09:14 PM
2

This wasn't rape, it was a series of bad but consensual choices. If it was a woman who behaved this way, the feminists would be out for blood and claiming that this was rape, but that doesn't mean they would be correct. Regardless of the gender of the victim, what happened is uncomfortable and shitty, but not criminal.
/r/MensRights01/07/15 08:01 PM
8

It is simply because women are considered intrinsically valuable, while men are only valued for what they do. A woman who makes nothing of herself is perceived as nowhere near as pathetic and repugnant as a man who makes nothing of himself. A woman who makes non-traditional choices is still a woman, because there are no specific expectations or requirements in order for a woman to be considered to have value. A man who makes non-traditional choices, on the other hand, is seen as not fulfilling h…
/r/MensRights16/05/15 11:57 PM
2

I took the screenshot because for people making harsh or sarcastic comments in this subreddit, it's often editing later to another position. Yes, we all know why you took the screenshot. You don't seem to see how weeny this comes off though, so I am willing to give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that you weren't trying to be a jerk.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 11:49 PM
2

I disagree. Don't hit back, just prosecute if you feel you can meet the very high evidentiary requirement for female-on-male assault. Hitting back will likely end with you facing charges, not the other way around. You are only entitled to self defense in proportion to the threat -- you couldn't kill someone for slapping you, for example. Unfortunately, the way most juries will view it is that a man punching a woman is an out of proportion response to a woman punching a man. Nine times out of ten…
/r/MensRights16/05/15 11:33 PM
1

Just ask "why can't blacks learn not to steal?" and ask her if she thinks this is offensive. If so, she's a theft culture enabler.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 11:22 PM
7

Actually, what he first said was that this guy should file for divorce. Then he made an offhand and obviously not serious comment. And come on, a screenshot?! Like you're investigating bank fraud or something? Jesus Christ, man. Smh.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 11:19 PM
10

I agree. Women like to claim that they're involved in something for the 'experience,' but almost always what they're really after is the status and social benefits resulting from it. A good litmus test for this is whether they tell others about what they've done. Many men never share many of their experiences and achievements, because the reward is intrinsic and not dependent on others approving and validating those experiences and achievements. Women, on the other hand, will tell others about s…
/r/TheRedPill16/05/15 11:10 PM
1

Is it just me, or does the very public collective pity of 2000 women seem a lot more humiliating than the original pic? It's not like any of these women would ever display any interest in this guy in everyday life - they've just made him a mascot and are checking a good deed box.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 06:43 PM
0

The guy who posted the original pic is a dick, but I honestly can't imagine anything more humiliating than very public pity from thousands of women at once. He's just a fucking mascot to these broads. This would make me feel less of a man, not more. Great post.
/r/TheRedPill09/03/15 04:19 PM
1

Haha ok that made me chuckle.
/r/TheRedPill09/03/15 04:15 PM
0

Sure, and pill mills are making it easy to get narcotics, but now that we're approaching socialized medicine, all that shit is gonna stop.
/r/TheRedPill18/02/15 06:20 PM
1

The lab reference ranges account for the fact that your testosterone levels go up and down throughout the day. Even at your lowest point, it is very unlikely that you'd be outside of normal limits unless you truly have a disorder. Furthermore, an isolated low testosterone won't get you there - you need a high LH and FSH too, to prove it isn't a pituitary problem. Without that, you'll get a diagnosis of hypogonadotropic hypogonadism and end up with a script for synthetic pituitary hormones instea…
/r/TheRedPill18/02/15 11:54 AM
47

Not illegal, just highly regulated. A doc can prescribe you testosterone, but good luck making that happen if you don't have the labs to prove you need it.
/r/TheRedPill17/02/15 05:39 PM
5

I disagree. How do you explain the whole "did you just insult your sister" bit with this interpretation?
/r/TheRedPill02/02/15 06:56 PM
4

If we're going to blame one gender, I'd blame girls. Anyone who's ever had a daughter or a younger sister knows that girls backstab and gossip like nobody's business, and they create horrible self esteem for each other. Every guy knows that growing up, confidence tended to depend on the female attention he received. But at the end of the day, your confidence is your own problem, no one else's. Nobody else is responsible for your happiness.
/r/TheRedPill02/02/15 06:50 PM
1

When I saw it last night, my impression was that the "sorry" was for being on the phone.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 02:59 PM
3

You're arguing against a straw man. Nobody here is saying women shouldn't be allowed to apply, so long as they are held to identical standards as male applicants. Standards have already been softened for women in the vast majority of military programs, so I see no reason other than wishful thinking to believe that won't happen here, too.
/r/TheRedPill31/01/15 03:07 PM
1

Watch what happens this is going to end up with the girl having made shit up I don't know, man, it sounds like he was literally caught mid-rape by several witnesses. The girl's testimony isn't really even part of this story. I'll refrain from judgment until there's a trial, but I gotta say, it sounds like this is legit, as rare as that is with regard to media coverage of rape allegations.
/r/TheRedPill30/01/15 03:47 PM
2

There's a far simpler solution - wrap it. Keep condoms on your person, don't let your girl near them, and always wear a condom. If one breaks, insist on plan B. A vasectomy is a more reliable solution I guess, but freezing sperm for potentially decades may not be the best option.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 05:12 AM
22

In my experience I've never had a friendship with a woman that is as valuable or profound as even my shallowest friendships with other men. Simply put, women do not care about your problems, and will respect you less for having them. Any friendship will quickly become one sided, since it is your biological instinct as a man to care for and protect her, but she has no similar instinct.
/r/TheRedPill30/01/15 04:13 AM
6

My thought is that if you tested positive for herpes, she could then blame you for giving it to her as some kind of guilt-driven manipulation tactic. Maybe that's too cynical though, as this girl sounds more honest than most.
/r/TheRedPill30/01/15 04:00 AM
1

BTW, that shitty post you quote at the beginning was written by a self-professed autistic girl, FWIW.
/r/TheRedPill29/01/15 11:28 PM
1

Has anyone here tried P90X? What's the consensus on that program? I'm looking for something I can do in my apartment, which would be much more convenient for me. I've got an adjustable set of dumbells that go up to 45lbs, and I've got a door frame pull-up bar. I use them, but inconsistently -- partly because I'm a med student and I have very little free time, but also partly because I honestly don't know how to maximize the time that I do have, with regard to which exercises will yield the great…
/r/TheRedPill29/01/15 10:19 PM
2

I'm familiar with the two drugs, and I'm confident that I would be able to take them safely and effectively, but I had no sense of how widespread they are. I've definitely thought about it some. The biggest stumbling block isn't anything scary about the drug but rather that I haven't the first idea how to acquire it. Obviously reddit is not a safe place to discuss sources, either. I assume I'd have to make inroads at a gym and eventually find the guy who knows a guy, etc. Do you think it's worth…
/r/TheRedPill29/01/15 01:58 PM
17

In all seriousness, do a lot of you guys use these?
/r/TheRedPill29/01/15 05:43 AM
5

Dated one once in college. Ultimately I ended up with an abdominal knife wound and she ended up in rehab. Haven't taken a comfortable shit since then. Don't fuck with BPD.
/r/TheRedPill27/01/15 02:42 PM
1

Long term, freebies and handouts DO keep people down. It's why the war on poverty has only created more poverty, and it's why a country like Haiti never develops an economy. When you subsidize a particular behavior, you get more of it. These kinds of programs subsidize a lack of credentials, and so the population targeted will ultimately end up less qualified. Still, I'm not sure how a program which involuntarily takes money or opportunity or both away from group A and gives it to group B can be…
/r/MensRights27/01/15 02:24 PM
2

I'm a white male medical student. Every step along the way, every institution would have preferred to have women or racial minorities, even if they were a little less qualified than me. Consequently I had to be far better than they did to get where I am, and I received significantly less help along the way. The blacks in my class were only required to have a 25 on their MCAT, and were offered a yearlong prep course, summer school, and a note taking service. White men like myself received none of…
/r/MensRights27/01/15 02:20 PM
1

That's always what happens when you get shit you didn't earn. Doesn't make the freebies any less of a privilege to those receiving them.
/r/MensRights27/01/15 02:11 PM
120

Couple of things. First, men are more likely to be a victim of violent crime, so freedom of walking around at night without fear is really a female privilege if any. Second, how is lack of affirmative action a white privilege? Seems to me the privilege goes to racial groups favored by the law.
/r/MensRights26/01/15 05:34 PM
3

there are tons of factors not accounted for in your studies Name some of them. And as far as the pullout method, I've personally tested it a couple thousand times And you think that your personal anecdote trumps large scale studies? Guess which scenarios are scarier? Because emotions and perception are great substitutes for science and knowledge. I'd love to have a rational discussion with you kids about this stuff, but the closed-mindedness on here is really off-putting. Barf. expertise Lulz. I…
/r/TheRedPill26/01/15 12:33 PM
8

That's great that you are a med student. But this is not a laboratory, this is real life. Are you under the impression that medicine all comes from fiddling around with petri dishes and microscopes? This is indeed real life, and I study real diseases and see real patients. I see real people every day whose real lives now involve consequences from preventable diseases that they contracted through risky behavior like yours. How many women have you slept with? How many patients have you seen? Every…
/r/TheRedPill26/01/15 12:23 AM
3

You are fortunate that your herpes is generally inactive, but not all are so lucky. I have many patients who suffer a fair amount from recurrent outbreaks that are not well controlled by the available medications. Furthermore, general herpes infection increases your risk of contracting HIV, partly because open sores from an outbreak can be a site of entry for HIV. Finally, though this is rare, herpes can be passed vertically from mother to child during delivery. If you have herpes, it is likely …
/r/TheRedPill25/01/15 11:34 PM
8

Okay, as a med student, I feel I need to reply regarding STDs. You are correct in that condoms do not offer full protection against HPV and HSV2, but there are some things you should know. HPV types 16, 18, 31, and 33 can cause penile squamous cell carcinoma, erythroplasia of Queyrat, and Bowen's Disease, all of which are kinds of penile skin cancer. In other words, they really suck, and they are preventable if you avoid HPV. HSV lesions can cause scarring and can lead to penile disfigurement an…
/r/TheRedPill25/01/15 11:13 PM
4

If you're saying that pharm companies are incapable of valid research, I strongly disagree.
/r/TheRedPill25/01/15 11:00 PM
2

How old are the kids in this scenario? If the group of girls could actually do some damage, you've gotta try to defend yourself, but you will likely catch some heat for it. Best option is to just cover up and take it but don't hit back, to avoid any accusations, but obviously your first priority is to not get seriously hurt or killed. Im not saying this is how it should be, but simply how it is. A man who hits a woman, even in self defense, will not escape unscathed. Probably there would be only…
/r/MensRights25/01/15 10:35 PM
3

Med student here. Most prostate cancer is less aggressive and invasive, and it also tends to affect mostly older men. We also have generally effective therapies for prostate cancer, and chemotherapy is rarely needed. This means that most men who get prostate cancer will not die from it. It is obviously still a serious disease, and just because it's usual clinical course is slower and less aggressive, that doesn't mean there aren't aggressive kinds of prostate cancer or that men don't die from it…
/r/MensRights25/01/15 10:28 PM
34

Jewish can refer to either the religion or to a set of ethnic groups. Ashkenazi Jew, for example, is a race.
/r/MensRights25/01/15 07:47 PM
2

The way to help OP is to recommend seeing a psychiatrist and trying to figure out whether his megalomania is due to a mood disorder or a personality disorder. My money is on bipolar 2.
/r/TheRedPill25/01/15 03:30 PM
6

The response is to get up and leave. If she grabs your dick and then rejects your advance, that isn't behavior you should tolerate.
/r/TheRedPill22/01/15 09:45 PM
1

I absolutely think he can condone free criticism of religion, especially when the alternate position is to condone violence against those who say things you don't like. Pretty sure it was "turn the other cheek," but this pope said he'd throw punches if someone called his mother a name. Doesn't sound real pious to me. Covering up a scandal isn't something that sets precedents or policy, and it doesn't change the behavior of the public. Saying free speech shouldn't cover opinions you don't like, a…
/r/TheRedPill20/01/15 12:53 AM
7

I hate this one more than the last. He's essentially opposed to free speech, for fucks sake.
/r/TheRedPill19/01/15 02:45 PM
4

Even if you remove his testimony, there are still some pretty damning objective facts.
/r/MensRights22/12/14 05:27 AM
-2

The counter argument they'll use is suggesting that we all abandoned feminism because we were hurt by individual women, and that we generalized our experiences to women in general, and therefore misogyny. We should be prepared to defend.
/r/MensRights22/12/14 04:05 AM
1

Yes, it's possible to lean left and also support Men's Rights, but feminism is a decidedly leftist movement, and the policies that we are fighting against mostly have their origins on the left. There's nothing wrong with trying to rise above the left-right spectrum, but a lot of these issues are clearly partisan, so I don't think there's any problem with use of 'right' and 'left' labels where appropriate. Regardless, I haven't found this sub to have a problem with partisanship, and I think usual…
/r/MensRights18/12/14 03:26 PM
1

Disappointing, but it doesn't matter. The article already had its impact, and created the discussion it was going to create.
/r/MensRights18/12/14 03:11 PM
1

intentionally deceptive euphemisms were not born with the advent of liberalism. Agreed. the phrase 'shell shock' was gradually renamed 'PTSD' to disassociate it from its most common cause - soldiery? This might not be the best example. Shell Shock was never in the DSM, and PTSD is. Shell Shock is what lay people were calling it, and PTSD is the clinical name given to the phenomenon when it was codified as a legitimate psychiatric illness.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 07:31 PM
1

I really like this thought process. We've gotta learn to play the game that the feminists have been playing all along.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 02:57 PM
15

I'm in medical school, and I've been explicitly told over and over that what I post on Facebook can be used as grounds for expulsion. Obviously posting patient data would be a serious violation, but that's not where they draw the line. I can be expelled for posting things that the administration considers "unprofessional," which would include posting articles that openly disagree with politically correct views. If I post something against gay marriage, for example, since I will likely have gay p…
/r/MensRights17/12/14 02:51 PM
2

I'm with you. I'm a hardline libertarian now, though I originally floated over from the right instead of the left. I liked traditionally conservative economic policies, but those have largely been abandoned by the Republican Party. The left used to have solid social stances, but they've now gone from defending liberty to squashing it.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 02:42 PM
2

Like it or not, feminism has clear ties to the left. The right spins things too, obviously, but this whole doublespeak political correctness thing is decidedly Progressive.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 02:40 PM
1

Ad hominem is when, in a debate or argument, you attack an irrelevant characteristic of your opponent in order to discredit them. I'm glad to see you can recite the definition, but you clearly don't know how to apply it. Attacking an irrelevant characteristic is exactly what you have done -- your description of the source as 'right wing' doesn't mean that anything they've said is incorrect, and so your dismissal of the article is inappropriate and fallacious. I can't believe you might one day ha…
/r/MensRights16/12/14 12:37 PM
1

Spot on. Really interesting read. Wish I could post this to my facebook without getting called before my school's Professionalism Committee.
/r/MensRights16/12/14 04:40 AM
2

Yep. All she's gotta do is say "i'm afraid for my children."
/r/MensRights16/12/14 04:30 AM
13

Perfect. So writing an article is 'violent,' but destroying someone's property isn't. These gals are pathetic.
/r/MensRights16/12/14 04:24 AM
5

That link explicitly says that if any VAWA funded program needs to have sex-segregated services, their only obligation is to provide a 'comparable service' to men. Women's shelters are by nature sex-segregated, since women are often trying to get away from abusive men. I bet the 'comparable service' is putting men up in a hotel, and I doubt that this would go anywhere if you tried to file a complaint. The sad fact is that nearly all shelters are for women and children only, and it is the expecta…
/r/MensRights16/12/14 04:18 AM
1

Buddy, you've got your head so far up your ass it's back on top of your shoulders. yet another right wing source attacking the left You've dismissed the article because you've labeled the source 'right wing'. This is a classic ad hominem. MRM is full of ignorant right-wing bullies Here's a second ad hominem. You've labeled the source a bunch of 'right wing bullies' and have attacked the character of the arguer instead of the argument. Nope. Try again. Solid retort. I take it you were the star of…
/r/MensRights16/12/14 04:05 AM
3

Ad hominem much? Can't actually defeat the content of the article, so you have to shout it down. Classy.
/r/MensRights15/12/14 01:59 PM
3

Wow. That study was literally a joke, as it is the tradition of that particular journal to publish a joke December issue. The Washington Post covered it, too; the study is merely that most Darwin Award recipients are male. Unsurprising, and it in no way proves that men are idiots. http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/speaking-of-science/wp/2014/12/11/study-men-are-just-more-likely-to-be-idiots/
/r/MensRights15/12/14 03:11 AM
0

And for some reason our two comments are downvoted...
/r/MensRights14/12/14 09:54 PM
1

Yep. Whole thing is clearly a joke.
/r/MensRights14/12/14 04:00 PM
5

I agree that there is a lot of hate coming from feminists, and that men are rarely afforded the same compassion and empathy that women routinely receive. Do we want to be like these compassionless feminists? If we project an attitude of generalized hate, if we lack compassion for an innocent female victim, we are no different. Be more than a visceral reaction to what has been done to you. Take an objective stance, and know that we are still likely decades away from real change. These things take…
/r/MensRights14/12/14 03:52 PM
4

Nothing shows weakness like constantly proclaiming how strong you are. A lion doesn't need to roar for you to fear his bite.
/r/MensRights14/12/14 03:01 PM
8

I'm sure you've been hurt and I'm sure you're justifiably angry, but you can't generalize that anger to all women. You sound like the feminists who want to punish all white males. Be angry at the organization of society, and the structure that benefits women and hurts men, but women in general are no more responsible for this structure than men. Yes, they're often the beneficiaries, but they were just born into it like you and me. Direct that anger somewhere more logical and productive.
/r/MensRights14/12/14 02:58 PM
2

Mine too. American women seem not to realize how brief their window is for healthy fertility. Realistically, nobody wants to have kids until after school, which these days means 22 at the earliest. They've really only got another 8 to 10 years to play with before they start running into problems. Nature did not intend for women to wait so long. They're fertile by 12, and they proceed to squander the first and healthier half of their window. (Not saying they should be popping out kids at 12, but …
/r/TheRedPill13/12/14 08:44 PM
3

Consider this - if this girl is over 30 and still doesn't want kids, it might be too late. If she takes another few years to change her mind, she may start running into fertility issues. She's also pushing into the age range where any kids she has will be high risk for Down's Syndrome. If I were you, I'd find somebody either younger or who's already decided they want kids (or both).
/r/TheRedPill13/12/14 04:46 PM
4

No chance of introspection. My female colleagues who have read the book all hated it, especially the ending. They stammered when I asked why. I think it's because they don't like the idea that a woman can be so plainly evil, and they don't like what it reveals about themselves. Women bristle at being handed redpill truths if they're too brutally presented, because no woman wants to ever feel complicit in anything negative. No woman wants to indict women or feminism. Edit: punctuation
/r/TheRedPill12/12/14 01:20 PM
3

To me it depends on the nature of the crime. I don't know if it's possible to truly rehabilitate serious violent offenders. In those cases I think the punishment is meant more as a deterrent, but that doesn't work very well either. In my opinion the biggest problem we have with the penal system is that the vast majority of our inmates are convicted of victimless crimes, such as drug possession or trafficking. Those are crimes that in my book shouldn't exist, and these are not people that need pu…
/r/MensRights12/12/14 03:28 AM
1

What I'm saying is that the HIV test can come back negative for the first several months of infection. I'm happy to run the test, but just because one test says you don't have HIV doesn't mean you're actually in the clear. In fact, the current recommendation is to re-test six months later because of this phenomenon. In other words, any given patient with a negative test result may actually be HIV positive. The reason for the FDA rule is because in the 90s, blood banks pushed hard against mandato…
/r/MensRights12/12/14 03:18 AM
1

Ah I see what you're getting at. I suppose it plays at an exaggeration of female submissive sexual urges, and it goes along with the idea of rape fantasies. Still, I think as a generalization, we are convincing many women that they were raped when they really weren't. There are far too many examples of women getting drunk and making poor choices, waking up full of regret, and ultimately concluding that the man they chose to sleep with actually committed a crime against them. To me, there needs t…
/r/MensRights12/12/14 03:05 AM
3

Normal people don't want to be a victim of any crime. Why is rape so special?
/r/MensRights11/12/14 01:08 PM
4

If someone else has to convince you that you were assaulted when you think you weren't, then you weren't assaulted. No other crime has this ridiculous component to it. If I've been robbed, nobody has to convince me that it happened. Sexual assault is an obvious crime when it's real. I'm sorry, but there just isn't that much nuance here. If you're left contemplating the subtleties of what happened last night, the answer is simply that you made some bad choices.
/r/MensRights11/12/14 05:30 AM
5

Yes, but HIV will not show up on a test until several weeks after infection at minimum. This is the key issue here. Edit: So to be clear, it is possible to have a negative HIV test but still be donating infectious blood. The reason we haven't moved to a "haven't had homosexual inter course in the past year" standard is because people lie all the time about their sexual history. Of course, it isn't just gays who lie, and people may lie about having had homosexual sex altogether. There really is n…
/r/MensRights11/12/14 05:16 AM
2

I would advise against starting that club at school. All you'll do is identify yourself as a target for social justice warriors, and you'll effectively ruin your chances with any of the girls who hear about your club. Nobody will join because no one wants to publicly go against feminism. Political correctness is too powerful. Better off just working on yourself. I admire the spirit but TRP is not designed to save society from the decline. Check out MensRights if that's what you're after.
/r/TheRedPill10/12/14 03:04 PM
6

My uncle is in that boat, except he paid for the entire mortgage and also financed his ex wife's boob job. Fucking makes my blood boil.
/r/TheRedPill10/12/14 02:37 PM
4

Since women started having careers, the gender gap for life expectancy has been shrinking. It's all lifestyle, coupled with the fact that we give preferentially good medical treatment to women.
/r/TheRedPill10/12/14 02:33 PM
12

I couldn't take it. Nobody's bones are so thick you can't fit a bracelet over them. Take it from a med student who has seen the x rays of thousands of obese people, and who has dissected a couple dozen obese cadavers. Your bones are in general always appropriately sized for your height. Unless this whale also happens to have Pagets Disease, it's not her bones. Even then, no skeleton weighs 330. This chick is a lunatic.
/r/TheRedPill09/12/14 01:01 PM
5

Obesity is a bmi over 30, technically. Unless your girl is 6'5", 200 is obese.
/r/TheRedPill09/12/14 12:53 PM
1

Ha I wasn't aware there was more than one. I was thinking of that chick who accused him of smearing her in feces. Can't remember her name.
/r/MensRights07/12/14 05:42 AM
5

And the Al Sharpton accusation.
/r/MensRights07/12/14 12:35 AM
1

Princes and princesses are important for the reason of royal birth. That might or might not be a good reason, but it is a reason. The only person that's famous for no reason whatsoever is Kim Kardashian.
/r/MensRights06/12/14 11:45 PM
9

What is this crap about PTSD excusing not reporting rape? The author seems to think sexual crime is the only thing that causes post traumatic stress. Rape victims aren't the only ones who suffer psychological trauma, but rape victims are for some reason the only ones debilitated by it enough for us to drop all expectations of reporting what happened.
/r/MensRights06/12/14 11:43 PM
3

At Vanderbilt University in the philosophy department, we wrote with pseudonyms that changed each time. Same idea. I always used a female name. Can't say with any certainty, but I'm pretty sure it netted me a few points.
/r/TheRedPill05/12/14 04:28 PM
1

I think maybe I wasn't clear. I agree that alpha means you're at the top of the hierarchy. When I say it means living without consideration of women, I mean exactly that. I don't mean that you don't associate with them, and I'm not talking about MGTOW. I mean you live life on your terms and generally are not concerned with what women want from you. You do not consider them and instead do as you please. Usually this is what women are attracted to anyway, but to me the way you live your life is mo…
/r/TheRedPill03/12/14 01:46 PM
3

Alpha doesn't necessarily mean you fuck a lot of girls, it means you live your life without consideration of them. Generally this is what women find attractive so the two tend to go hand in hand, but there is no number of belt notches in the definition of alpha male.
/r/TheRedPill03/12/14 03:53 AM
12

The analysis has been done, many times. One famous study inserted Foley catheters into women who then ejaculated. (A foley goes through the urethra and into the bladder.) The theory there was that if ejaculate is really urine, it will go into the catheter, but if it is not, it will enter the urethra past the catheter tip and therefore will exit the body outside the catheter. This particular study found the ejaculate traveling inside the catheter and concluded that female ejaculate is just urine.…
/r/TheRedPill02/12/14 08:56 PM
3

Wow, don't downvote this guy just because he disagreed. We're here to discuss. I think you're partially right. I think a girl like this might fantasize about this kind of sexual experience, but I would also bet that she would be uncomfortable with it if it were to actually happen to her. I would worry about getting into some legal trouble afterwards, because these are the kind of girls who file regret charges. Then again, it also seems probable to me based on my experiences that she'd be into th…
/r/TheRedPill02/12/14 02:06 PM
5

What's a yad stop? I've not heard that term here before.
/r/TheRedPill02/12/14 01:56 PM
1

The problem isn't that we're not taking LeBouf's claims seriously, it's that feminists have shifted the definition of rape way too far. I wouldn't have any sympathy if this exact scenario happened to a woman either. Frankly, if it isn't violent, it isn't rape. Being too timid to speak your mind doesn't mean someone raped you. Being drunk doesn't either.
/r/TheRedPill02/12/14 01:52 PM
0

Anyone else see this comment? I'm a redditor and women's right activist. Fuck whoever thinks this woman did something wrong. Not only did she help humankind by putting a white male in jail, she let the world know that women can be empowered and not to be messed with! Some of you make me sick. -lolroe, redditor extraordinaire, feminist philosopher, and moderator of /r/bodyacceptance What the hell?
/r/MensRights30/11/14 10:48 PM
4

I wonder if it's only men that wouldn't speak up, or if women would stay quiet too. I'd like to see all four attempts.
/r/MensRights24/11/14 12:50 PM
5

Seconded. This list would contain the name of every man who ever took an income home to his wife, and of every man who ever invented a new device or technology or policy. There is no male work that doesn't offer its primary benefits to women. Even the NFL benefits breast cancer research more than any male issue.
/r/MensRights17/11/14 02:00 PM
1

Yes, I would want to check chemistries, a lipid panel, testosterone, gonadotropins, thyroid hormones, and prolactin. Since its episodic and not persistent, though, I would bet all the labs will come back normal.
/r/TheRedPill14/11/14 03:40 PM
6

Med student here. Viagra can help even if it's a psychological problem, but Viagra without sexual stimulus will not cause erection. Viagra plus physical stimulation of the penis usually causes erection, unless there is an anatomical problem. For OP, pop a Viagra, wait a half hour for it to kick in, and then get busy and see what happens. My bet is that you will see some benefit, but I can't guarantee it. If it doesn't work, so what? You haven't lost anything, and there are other things to try. B…
/r/TheRedPill12/11/14 06:11 PM
5

I looked at the first two and that's enough to get the point. Female cognitive dissonance, more shocking news at 10. A large part of feminism isn't about what women want, it's about intellectual dissatisfaction with what they truly, subconsciously, viscerally desire. They don't like that they like these things. They don't want to be satisfied by what actually satisfies them. Turns out Freud wasn't so far off (and the reason everyone calls him nuts is another angle of this same problem).
/r/MensRights11/11/14 01:49 AM
1

I greet men on the street all the time. A nod or a smile, or a wave, or a "what's up?" What I don't do is go out of my way and complement random guys, because I'm not interested in romancing another man. I don't really think there's any more to the story than this.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 01:40 AM
2

There are so many great books I need to re-read, ones that I didn't really understand in high school. I'm too busy with career stuff right now, but damn, I wish I wasn't such a lazy douchebag in my youth. I wasted so much time trying to have fun. Reminds me of a conversation I had with my most recent ex, who moved to Australia to get nailed by some Aussie and work in a coffee shop. She was all about fun, and I was all about work. She kept saying how important it was to have these adventurous lif…
/r/TheRedPill09/11/14 05:39 PM
6

I'm with you, I would have loved to have this chick all over me, but that's just me. Not gonna force this kid to think the same way I do.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 02:15 PM
0

Women complaining and never feeling satisfied with their lot in life? Boy am I shocked.
/r/MensRights08/11/14 03:17 PM
6

Yeah but when we say young we mean under 40. Obama had the younger half of the country, and all the women and blacks. Basically he had everyone that wanted to be taken care of, which isn't just 19 year olds.
/r/TheRedPill08/11/14 01:28 PM
3

Don't forget your monocle and cigar! Seriously though, I get the impression that they think we're all Henry F. Potter.
/r/TheRedPill07/11/14 04:55 AM
4

I tried to read it, but I can't take all the self righteous bloviation and snark.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 01:10 PM
1

Actually, people DO use "Republican" to mean those things. Usually they say Republican with a condescending and negative tone, and they usually mean religious wingnut or sexist or racist, etc. Liberals tend to view themselves as the arbiters of tolerance and justice, and feminism fits this mold. Feminism's sure as hell not a conservative thing, so what else is it?
/r/MensRights05/11/14 12:54 PM
9

I can hear the jimmies being rustled, starting with Susan Owens.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 12:47 PM
3

Ya Ya Ya
/r/MensRights04/11/14 01:40 PM
8

Which is exactly why it's not a great name. I don't want to be perceived as children.
/r/TheRedPill02/11/14 02:41 PM
4

I think Lena might be the most unappealing and distasteful person I've ever seen. Not just physically off-putting but repulsive in every other way, too.
/r/TheRedPill01/11/14 04:10 PM
1

The 2013 National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) as conducted by the US Bureau of Justice Statistics. 65% of mugging victims are male. In other words, men are about twice as likely to be mugged as compared to women.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 02:20 PM
2

Yeah, but he was also a tremendous douchebag. Not to knock his physique achievements or anything. I find him inspirational as far as working out and getting laid, but that's as far as I take it. I don't to be the kind of person Zyzz was.
/r/TheRedPill30/10/14 03:26 PM
1

Mugging is a gender specific issue. Men are much more likely to be mugged than women. Actually, men are much more likely to be victims of every violent crime other than rape. Anyway, I don't disagree that catcalling is gender specific, but I disagree that it's a problem. It can be annoying, sure, but part of living in a free society is that you have to tolerate the annoying behavior of others. You can't abridge fundamental freedoms just for the sake of convenience. Also, pointing out that it's g…
/r/MensRights30/10/14 03:24 PM
14

There's a reason it's mostly low-income, low-status men who do the catcalling. They're giving it away because it isn't worth anything to begin with. Women see the behavior as creepy because these guys are low SMV, plain and simple. They call it "threatening" and "creepy" and "harassment" because they can't stop at calling it what it really is -- "unattractive." Imagine a good looking white guy with a fine suit and a rolex walking past and saying any of the things these other men were saying: "Ha…
/r/TheRedPill29/10/14 02:59 PM
2

This is exactly my problem with it. I completely admit that it must be annoying to have men that you perceive as losers hitting on you all the time. What I don't understand is the push to vilify men simply because they can be annoying.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 02:49 PM
5

I agree that if you swap the genders you'd see a stark difference. The man would be aggressively panhandled at and cased for a potential mugging, rather than being told pleasant things like "Hello" and "Have a nice day." Every time I'm in an urban setting, I have homeless follow me around and behave far more threateningly than the men in this video. Don't you agree?
/r/MensRights29/10/14 02:47 PM
2

I'm not saying it's a good thing, I'm merely saying it isn't a societal problem. There will always be a small percentage of people that misbehave. I'm not saying we should accept that misbehavior, but I think we should call it what it is - individual misbehavior and not "rape culture."
/r/MensRights29/10/14 02:44 PM
17

Or a video about how black men get ignored. Oh wait, same video.
/r/TheRedPill29/10/14 11:21 AM
1

http://archpedi.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=1748355 QED.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 10:13 PM
2

My God, this describes me so well. I could never put a finger on it until now, thanks to your beautifully articulated post. Well at least now I've identified a very specific thing I can work on. Thank you!
/r/TheRedPill28/10/14 09:46 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter