TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Karma9999 Archive

View 2 posts and 393 comments by Karma9999 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
81

Marriage/ChildrenKarma9999/r/MensRights19/02/18 03:08 PM
47

Karma9999/r/MensRights01/06/14 08:25 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
10

Because "they" haven't decided anything. He's decided he doesn't want anything to do with her, and she's decided she wants the kid. Her choice. Why should he pay for anything she's decided that goes against what he wants?
/r/MensRights19/01/24 05:00 PM
7

It's not the same thing, but it is men insisting on having a say when their own lives are impacted so heavily by someone else's choices. Thankfully they are starting to appear in the world of politics, as described here https://en.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/199vhd6/this_may_be_a_historic_moment_for_mens_rights_in/
/r/MensRights19/01/24 04:45 PM
9

The source is linked above, this is virtually all man-hatred, equating men with sex offenders, paedophiles, and something to do with emergency responders, however that works.
/r/MensRights14/01/24 11:13 PM
1

And I'm sorry you're a white knight, seems a little out of place here yeah?
/r/PussyPassDenied24/07/18 07:08 AM
8

Not quite. He said the general public would say a male perp should go to jail, not that it was what the sentence should be by law. I do wonder if he'd sentence a man to jail for this or not, but he didn't contradict himself here.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/07/18 11:13 PM
0

He has eyes, ears, testicles and kidneys all of which are easily broken. She is also a woman [ofc] making any damage to her a very serious matter. The guy he was videoing was not a small chap yet she got away from him. Finally he's perfectly correct, it's not his job and as I said before if he gets hurt he gets no help from the store. So fuck that. You can take your chivalry and stuff it.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/07/18 10:11 PM
3

If he had intervened and got injured in the process, do you think the store would have helped with his medical bills? Would they bollocks.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/07/18 04:50 PM
3

"No such thing as bad advertising". This may have been a really good move.
/r/MensRights23/07/18 03:53 PM
3

Pause it before she steps forward and look at the kid in the hoodie. Notice the extended middle finger? That's a hint that someone's pissed off already, before you go stepping on their work.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/07/18 09:08 PM
1

Over 10 years old. You could do to get more up to date numbers, as they'd probably support your claim better. As it is, we still don't know. Oh yeah, and "foreign-born" also includes American, Canadian etc. In fact, I wonder if it would include British ex-pats as well. Phrasing is everything.
/r/MensRights17/07/18 05:03 PM
1

And now we're back to claiming 50% of the birthrate. Let's see the source.
/r/MensRights17/07/18 05:49 AM
1

Oh I'll grant you the most popular name as a collective, but not seeing anything close to 40% of childrens names. If you stretch it you may get 40% of boys names according to that website [which I can't say I've ever seen before so reliability is an issue].
/r/MensRights16/07/18 08:21 PM
2

It's at something like 40% if I remember correctly. Let's see a source on that. 40% of children, where boys are 51% or so would be almost 80% of all boys born in the UK. Kinda hard to believe that.
/r/MensRights16/07/18 06:50 PM
0

See what happens when you don't read the topic? :)
/r/MensRights16/07/18 09:47 AM
3

Hohum, not going to keep on repeating myself.
/r/MensRights16/07/18 02:02 AM
4

The Men's Rights subreddit is a place for those who wish to discuss men's rights and the ways said rights are infringed upon. Not trying to put a shitty science on a pedestal.
/r/MensRights16/07/18 01:54 AM
17

"much more likely to have parts of his genitals amputated"
/r/MensRights16/07/18 01:40 AM
6

Ahh gender studies, the social science of social sciences.
/r/MensRights16/07/18 01:37 AM
5

I've got just under 30 years experience in my profession, and last night I was being told how to do it by a carer with under 6 months experience. AS you say it happens to everyone from everyone. Blaming men for it is cherry-picking your target rather than being honest.
/r/MensRights16/07/18 01:35 AM
6

There was a [one-armed] chap who shot his wife dead [in the UK] because of the distress her dementia was causing her. It was reported fairly sensitively in the press. Should be easy enough to find if you want to have a read.
/r/MensRights15/07/18 05:03 PM
4

This is where you need to be able to appeal too lenient sentences.
/r/MensRights11/07/18 12:19 PM
2

I really hope he got her consent in writing and on video before this happened, otherwise he's in for a nasty shock later on.
/r/MensRights09/07/18 09:45 AM
1

Hells bells. Feel free to read through my post history and you'll see that I'm as opposed to elective circumcisions as anyone. As I've pointed out twice already, I was talking here about a phimosis that didn't resolve in any other way. Arguing against people who already share your point of view is a spectacular waste of time.
/r/MensRights07/07/18 06:51 AM
0

a phimosis that didn't resolve Not all of them, but in extreme circumstances.
/r/MensRights06/07/18 05:12 PM
1

Circumcision is beneficial in a few rare cases, for medical reasons only. This seems to be one of them, a phimosis that didn't resolve. If she doesn't like being reminded of the pain she's caused her son, then that's to her credit.
/r/MensRights06/07/18 08:03 AM
2

That's ok, just talk about female circumcision for a little while.
/r/MensRights06/07/18 06:55 AM
1

No one's going to go "yes, we understand! We must do everything they want right now!" It's baby steps every time. This is a good start, only a start but that's more than we had last week. Next week? who knows.
/r/MensRights06/07/18 05:35 AM
1

Sure, but it gives us a start in public discussion, 1 in 4 women and men.. the playing fields are even. Next question is "why are there no shelters for men?"
/r/MensRights05/07/18 09:03 PM
2

You can follow it, but it is disjointed and uncomfortable to watch/listen to. And tbh, it would take 20 secs or so to prep, and you'd save more than that in the video without the staring into space remembering who you are calling what.
/r/MensRights03/07/18 01:26 AM
2

Some preperation would be useful. Stopping every 3 seconds to work out who you are calling the defendant and the victim really fucks up the flow of the statement. Just write it out how you want to say it!
/r/MensRights02/07/18 11:47 PM
2

I'm just surprised that thread hasn't been deleted by the mods yet.
/r/MensRights02/07/18 07:51 PM
81

"we are going to have a big popup in the middle of your screen, this process may take a few minutes".
/r/MensRights02/07/18 11:35 AM
6

That's his opinion and he's entitled to it, doesn't mean the rest of us have to agree with him. Doesn't affect the process he's going through though, hope some good comes out of all this.
/r/MensRights30/06/18 07:02 AM
1

You are currently not able to access this website in the EU. We are continuing to explore options to allow you have future access to our full range of digital content while we align our services to comply with the EU General Data Protection Regulations. . Unfortunately, our website is currently unavailable in most European countries. etc. Nvm.
/r/MensRights19/06/18 04:47 PM
1

Sorry, this content is not available in your region.
/r/MensRights19/06/18 04:29 PM
-1

Sure, suits me and I agree with his reasons, making a law with no debate is dangerous. All I was saying was that no one called him a pervert except himself, it's in the damn article if anyone bothered to read it.
/r/MensRights19/06/18 12:40 PM
-41

No he hasn't, he was the one who used the word pervert. They were just protesting him blocking the bill which their rights of speech allow them to. I do object to this whole process because the issue is being used as a distraction, a way to get a feel-good result for May, and the protestors are being suckered into helping out.
/r/MensRights19/06/18 02:23 AM
3

Move right back in if you can, kick the lodger out, get all plans for shared custody in writing. As everyone is saying, lawyer up now and stop asking random weirdos on the internet [us] for important advice.
/r/MensRights11/06/18 02:05 AM
3

Education gap? You mean they are going to try to get as many men to go to uni as women?
/r/MensRights07/06/18 01:05 AM
2

Tbf, that's how plea deals usually work, reducing the charges in return for a guilty plea.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/06/18 05:13 PM
8

So they don't hand over evidence before the trial and afterwards appeal lawyers aren't allowed to look at it? So much for the right to a fair trial.
/r/MensRights06/06/18 02:21 PM
1

chest pain as above, called 999 at 10.20, was being stented just after 12md. Fairly straightforward and uncomplicated event.
/r/MensRights03/06/18 07:01 AM
1

It's obviously much more important to those mods that you not be ideologically tainted than you be a supportive caring human being. It shows what type of people are running those subs.
/r/MensRights30/05/18 01:33 AM
2

Chest pain, ambulance, attended A&E, diagnosed heart attack, transfer via ambulance to centre of excellence for cardiology, scan and stents inserted within 2 hours. I'd say it's fast enough when it needs to be.
/r/MensRights28/05/18 07:19 PM
2

The problem the yanks have is that their medicine has to make a profit. So however much something costs, there's always a "shareholder surcharge" added on top. The NHS doesn't have to deal wtih that [currerntly] so it's always going to be cheaper for us.
/r/MensRights28/05/18 11:45 AM
2

Not to worry, but sounded interesting.
/r/MensRights24/05/18 03:43 PM
2

Got a link to that? I'd like to take a look.
/r/MensRights24/05/18 03:40 PM
1

Thanks for linking that video, it was beautifully done. Sad to say, but be careful who you open up to like this in real life, it may make you a target.
/r/MensRights22/05/18 02:03 AM
13

/r/undelete where good posts go to die.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 08:51 PM
1

It's not about them, it's about you. Only your opinion about yourself matters.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 04:52 PM
0

And that is exactly how to lose the moral high-ground.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 01:14 PM
2

I speak 'Mercian' lol That is fascinating, can you earn a living with that?
/r/MensRights07/05/18 03:52 PM
1

So how'd it turn out? This is from 5 years ago..
/r/PussyPassDenied30/04/18 09:25 PM
8

If she didn't want something mansplaining to her then she shouldn't have asked the question. Mansplaining.. explaining while in the possession of testicles. If she didn't want something explaining to her by this man, she shouldn't have asked the question.. If she didn't want something explaining to her by this man, she shouldn't have asked for/attended the interview.. According to the Ontario liberal party, this woman shouldn't be asking men questions. So much for equality.
/r/MensRights30/04/18 08:43 AM
1

They do it because it pisses you off. Either learn to ignore it or fight back against it in a way that will discourage them from using the phrase.
/r/MensRights26/04/18 01:16 PM
5

She was jailed for seven-and-a-half years after pleading guilty to the offence of controlling or coercive behaviour in an intimate relationship.
/r/MensRights24/04/18 12:06 AM
7

Just a quick question, which is more intimate, dental hygienist or dentist?
/r/MensRights21/04/18 07:04 AM
2

It was because it is anecdotal, haven't seen any proof for it.
/r/MensRights20/04/18 01:12 AM
2

Mothers are anecdotally able to lift cars off their kids. The strength comes from love, they wouldn't be able to do it for anyone else. [crap example but you get the idea]
/r/MensRights20/04/18 12:42 AM
4

In his position, you think he didn't realise what he was doing when he took those hits to protect her? He most likely thought he was going to die right there and then, but did it anyway. He was obviously a lot more committed to her than she is to him. And yes, I've seen those very same conversations and been asked many many times about it. In the end it's something each one of us has to decide for themselves, if we could devote our lives to someone else. Ignore the fact that it's in virtually al…
/r/MensRights20/04/18 12:18 AM
1

wedding boys ?
/r/MensRights20/04/18 12:08 AM
-5

Discrimination is ok if it makes money.. If they tell you why you aren't getting paid then that's one thing, just saying "no" is completely different.
/r/MensRights10/04/18 08:20 PM
2

I thought it was police who couldn't use recordings, private citizens could? And as the other poster said, you can use it to influence public opinion before any question of legal proceedings come up.
/r/MensRights07/04/18 07:10 AM
3

If he can prove that there was no offence then the ball game changes. At the moment he is relying on reasonable doubt [he said/she said], and the people who are accusing him are ignoring that. So either they change their tune, withdraw the accusation, or he takes them to court for libel and wins.
/r/MensRights06/04/18 03:29 PM
2

As I said, weigh that against a charge of rape or sexual assault, it's a no-brainer to me.
/r/MensRights06/04/18 03:26 PM
28

Sooner or later people are going to realise that the only way to avoid this kind of shit is to record everything. Even just an audio recording would be enough proof that nothing untoward happened, without it you are wide open for any kind of accusation. There may be laws in your area about recording people covertly but weigh that up against a false accusation, then decide for yourself.
/r/MensRights06/04/18 10:23 AM
1

.. As soon as it gets into mainstream media rather than just here.
/r/MensRights04/04/18 07:27 PM
1

.. As soon as it gets into mainstream media rather than just here.
/r/MensRights04/04/18 07:27 PM
1

This wasn't about housework :p Some women seem so bothered that they on average take home less than men, this was to show the difference in the hours they both work to get that take home pay.
/r/MensRights04/04/18 01:08 AM
2

Think we should start #Rest4MeToo. Work out the average number of hours of paid work men and women do, and then publicise it to force equality. Work done at home does not count unless it's paid of course, and days off sick will reduce your average rate.
/r/MensRights02/04/18 09:50 PM
-7

He was admitted with phimosis, one of the few good reasons to carry out a circumcision.
/r/MensRights02/04/18 04:19 PM
1

It should be "some people who are in difficult situations [looking after children with minimal assistance] should get a small amount of lenience", male or female. But what has started off as a good intention has been clawed at and "why not me" 'd until we get this crap.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/04/18 10:20 AM
9

All this article is saying is that judges are effectively biased. A woman who gets credit for having a child when that child was only born because she was going to jail should not get points for having it. Allowing judges and prosecutors to "exercise their discretion" automatically leads to bias, and that bias being enshrined in law. There are guidelines and minimum sentences for a reason, these should be rewritten to remove the bias and then applied to everyone equally.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/03/18 02:52 PM
3

It's also about what everyone around her would know, that she is such a bad mother that the father is a better option. Better to kill the kid than that! Sick.
/r/MensRights27/03/18 07:24 PM
2

Research your opponent, find out what she wants to do after highschool.. maybe be a teacher etc. Ask her if she'd be happy with a part time janitor making the same amount as she would working full time as a teacher. Because that's how the 77c on the $ was worked out, comparing total people not jobs.
/r/MensRights26/03/18 07:22 PM
16

Troll-bait. Can we stop re-posting this? It's just had it's one year anniversary.
/r/MensRights26/03/18 03:51 PM
9

An excellent short article, I love that attitude.
/r/MensRights25/03/18 03:27 AM
1

I was conflicted about this one. I'm not convinced that this deserves being evicted, but at the same time she had a go at paramedics working at the time, so fuck that. She's also got a long history of being a bitch so maybe she deserves it. Also, #freeDankula
/r/PussyPassDenied24/03/18 04:04 AM
6

This is the post we refer feminists to when they say they give a damn about men. Hilariously, the thread it was posted in was meant to be the post they refer to when they want to prove they care.
/r/MensRights22/03/18 04:46 AM
1

Ahh k, thanks for that.
/r/MensRights20/03/18 02:44 AM
5

Got some details on this please?
/r/MensRights20/03/18 01:53 AM
2

Looking at it I think that this was written by the interviewer from the Guardian, not by Cathy Newman.
/r/MensRights19/03/18 10:56 PM
22

Twitter et al weakly argue that the point is freedom of speech – a cause fought for the hardest by those who have the ugliest things to say. What an appalling point of view, especially for a journalist who should know better. This is why I stopped reading the Guardian.
/r/MensRights19/03/18 05:49 PM
2

Too weird for Tumblr?
/r/MensRights18/03/18 04:22 PM
1

Possibly, that's for the rest of the world, not the UK.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/03/18 05:25 PM
3

The only ads you see on the BBC are for it's own content [coming next, next week, etc]. You won't see ads paid for by a 3rd party.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/03/18 04:31 PM
1

You could reply to it asking how come more women are in university than men nowadays.
/r/MensRights09/03/18 02:07 PM
7

There's the same risk as happens now, that they may get caught and prosecuted. This way there is no risk to either party until a guilty verdict comes in. Don't forget we still have to protect rape victims. Outing them after being raped is pretty heartless. I'm talking about trials here, not a cushy "get together and crucify some male student" that passes for Title 11 atm.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/03/18 02:17 AM
28

Both should have identities kept private during a trial.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/03/18 01:59 AM
34

I'm a big fan of anonymity for all until the verdict is in. If it's not guilty then the anonymity remains, if not then the guilty party gets named.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/03/18 01:58 AM
117

Nope, he was found not guilty, not she found guilty of fraudulent accusation. On another note: . “You must be interested in sexual behavior just based on how you’re dressed and drinking.” sorry but if you're dressed as a stripper and doing body shots then that's a pretty strong indicator of what you are interested in.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/03/18 12:54 AM
3

Best option would be to join in the metoo tag and make enough noise so that everyone realises it includes men being assaulted as well. One way or another it'll have a good result.
/r/MensRights07/03/18 03:30 PM
8

Thought she was in Canada? And yes, she's a joke.
/r/MensRights28/02/18 10:51 PM
55

Hope the security arrangements are solid, I'd put money on an "accidental" fire alarm going off.
/r/MensRights28/02/18 06:09 PM
7

You can also donate through https://mydonate.bt.com/charities/mankindinitiative without signing up for VM.
/r/MensRights28/02/18 02:39 PM
3

Womens day/month have commercials on tv and posters all over the city but never do i see anything or anyone talk about men's issues. These things cost money. That's the first step to getting the message out there, raising money.
/r/MensRights28/02/18 02:37 PM
9

I think he means that it doesn't matter what gender/sex you are, you can still rape/be raped.
/r/MensRights25/02/18 03:30 PM
1

Something to consider, the plea deal that everyone here is assuming she will get is usually given by the prosecutor in order to secure a conviction, or to avoid the necessity of a trial. In this case there's no doubt about the conviction, they have her confession already. If they wanted to avoid a trial then they would have done that already, so I suspect she's going to end up with a considerable sentence.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 12:16 PM
4

This was a cross post I thought was relevant here, sorry for causing you problems.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 04:06 PM
2

Take them off-campus completely. The Uni will have no jurisdiction there, tell em to shove it.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 11:01 PM
17

That's my point. If TD was brigading comments would be a few hundred points up or down depending. That the top comment is so low scored shows that they aren't doing anything here.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 03:31 PM
16

Yeah, the top comment here has 22 upvotes and doesn't refer to Trump at all. Is TD is so small that's all they can muster?
/r/MensRights14/02/18 02:44 PM
1

Talked to a hell of a lot of nurses in my career, I've met 1 who married a doctor out of a few thousand. Nurses tend to prefer men in uniform, police, ambulance, army and other nurses. Most doctors tend to get involved with other doctors, from the few I've talked to about this.
/r/MensRights05/02/18 03:36 PM
3

Oh it does mean anal, just for some reason in US law it covers oral as well.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/01/18 11:29 PM
4

It covers blow jobs apparently.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/01/18 09:19 PM
7

"We reject appellant's assertion that because he was fifteen years old when he had intercourse with L.H., he was incapable of consent. So minors can consent to sex? That's interesting.....
/r/MensRights25/01/18 01:24 PM
2

Yes, his first post named no names, called her an "influencer" and had redactions to maintain anonymity.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/01/18 09:53 PM
13

And yet now she's posted a vid about how bad she's been treated and how she's a victim blah blah blah. In other words she's milking it for everything she can. She's not a victim, she started this whole thing off. If she hadn't been trying to cadge a freebie then none of this would have happened.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/01/18 08:56 AM
148

The owner played it really well, he's got more publicity than she would ever have managed with her visit, he hasn't had to comp a free room, and he gets to tell a spoiled princess that she's spoiled.. win win win.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/01/18 04:31 PM
7

In this case you identify the mother, you identify the daughter.. it's to protect the girl. In other cases against men if you are able to identify the children from naming the father then they will order papers to keep it quiet. Of course, there's no guarantee the papers will go along with it.
/r/MensRights01/01/18 05:35 PM
4

It won't happen seeing as one of them is pursuing legal action against the Met and CPS, it wouldn't surprise me if the other did as well.
/r/MensRights22/12/17 11:42 AM
1

This was a panel of judges, they just felt that the mothers career choice was more important than the father keeping contact with his daughter. The "jury of judges" failed miserably. There's no point in mandatory mediation, as anyone who's not happy with the decision would go to court anyway. The only thing that will make any difference is for courts to remember that fathers have the same rights as mothers and for the courts to actually back that up. You explain well why it's not always a good i…
/r/MensRights21/12/17 10:40 PM
3

For an example of how fair divorce laws are take a look at this. This wasn't the 60's and 70's, this was two days ago. These stories are ten a penny, a case where the mother gets a poor deal is incredibly rare and usually has massive egregious factors involved. The real problem is that these accusations are being brought from years and decades ago. There's no proof, no witnesses for or against the accused, it's he said/she said and a whole bunch of people jumping on the bandwagon for various mot…
/r/MensRights21/12/17 12:53 PM
2

If you believe that divorce and child custody legislation are fair nowadays then you are in the wrong place. How did this happen? The "tender years" doctrine brought in by very early feminists/suffragettes still affects current thinking and practise. Regarding our current conversation, the women you say who were complicit in the casting couch saga do carry some of the blame for their lack of actions. They valued a career choice over the effects on other women. I'm not absolving the directors of …
/r/MensRights20/12/17 11:30 AM
1

I'm not sure where the references to prostitutes comes from, I agree that they can be raped/assaulted the same as anyone else can be but I don't see how that's relevant to this discussion.
/r/MensRights20/12/17 03:00 AM
1

I'd love to answer you, but I've no idea what point it is you are trying to make. My point was that an actress who has voluntarily gone into a sexual relationship with a director in order to get a part has no right to complain many years down the line about her own choice. [This of course will also apply to actors and female directors as well, and for that matter gay relationships.] Edit: On thinking it over, I guess you are saying that the actresses are in the role of a prostitute, sex for a ro…
/r/MensRights20/12/17 01:39 AM
2

when I was starting acting in the early Sixties, the director of the theatre I was working at showed me some photographs he got from women who were wanting jobs. . . some of them had at the bottom of their photograph 'DRR' — directors' rights respected. In other words, if you give me a job, you can have sex with me. 3rd paragraph of the article, it was a code phrase to indicate sex for a part.
/r/MensRights20/12/17 12:18 AM
1

I was pointing out that it wasn't one-sided, that there were two [or more] people involved in trading sexual favours and that both are to blame for the situation. As for actually "removing" them, I suspect you will find some very respected actors and actresses were involved in this.
/r/MensRights20/12/17 12:16 AM
3

It was in the article..
/r/MensRights20/12/17 12:10 AM
45

Anyone involved needs to go So all those women who's photos had "DRR" at the bottom should go? Also, if someone did that back then, it has to cast doubt on any claims they put forwards of assault later on. You can't participate in the casting couch, have a great career and then 20 years on say you were forced..
/r/MensRights19/12/17 05:17 PM
1

I think that if you take offense at this cover, then you are scared about your past behavior being exposed. You don't need to look very far. Assuming that if someone doesn't agree with you or dislikes what you had to say, well they MUST be a rapist or sex offender, of course. It was pretty clear in my first reply, maybe instead of reading your own stuff over and over you should read what the reply is once or twice?
/r/MensRights15/12/17 10:44 AM
4

See this is the problem with this kind of tactic: "IF you don't agree with us THEN you must be a rapist". What a load of toss, pure feminist bullshit.
/r/MensRights13/12/17 12:25 PM
2

Yeah, I remembered that after my first post which was why I edited it.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/12/17 07:49 AM
-4

The pound sign £ derives back to the Roman empire.. no need to be a tit. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pound_sign
/r/PussyPassDenied09/12/17 06:16 PM
-18

£ is a pound sign.. #=hashtag. Do american keyboards not carry the £ sign? edited to hash key.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/12/17 02:21 PM
10

Any headteacher could deal with that easily: "Dear parents, following blah case of abuse we are implementing a recording system in school, please sign the release form below to be part of this". Protects both at the same time.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/12/17 01:56 PM
2

"Women's health is not men's responsibility." Oh that will go down well.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 01:38 PM
11

Would like to see a "body of work" before jumping on the bandwagon, let's see if she maintains this perspective once the backlash starts.
/r/MensRights28/11/17 01:54 PM
2

Downvoted for being a bitch about downvotes.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/11/17 01:15 PM
16

She doesn't sound a million miles away from Mother Teresa tbh.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/11/17 04:17 PM
3

In the 15 years Professor Franca Cortoni has studied sex offenders, she had never heard of experiences like those of Baldwin, Jenny, and the four other women, but found them unsurprising. In other words their claims are probably bullshit, but the expert doesn't want to come right out and say so.
/r/MensRights25/10/17 11:13 PM
2

50 to 1? That would turn her into a literal cumbucket, 1 encounter every couple of weeks at best, no cuddle time and definitely no way to get him to fix that leak in the guttering whatsoever. [please dear lord lets not have a debate over how many women a man could fertilise. Point is there'd be no spare time apart from the sex and after a while even that would "dry up"]
/r/MensRights18/10/17 09:52 AM
3

I'm sure all women want to share a man with 49 others. About as much as I'm sure you would want to be one of those men who don't get to be the 1 in the 1:50..
/r/MensRights18/10/17 05:11 AM
1

Except when men try to have a conversation about an important issue, it gets shut down by feminists.
/r/MensRights18/10/17 03:27 AM
1

Your wife comes to you and says "I wan't an open marriage after 20 years of being faithful". What does that sound like to you? 1 step away from "I'm going to have an affair whether you like it or not". Read the OP, He was opposed, She talked him into it. I'm not calling anyone names here, by her own post she was the instigator in all this.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/10/17 02:02 PM
72

Only because everyone lets them get away with it.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/10/17 03:13 PM
1

Not really a mistake, presumably the clinic would be able to afford quite a considerable payout whereas the wife would not. Sure the wife is responsible while the clinic wasn't anywhere near the same degree, but at least there'd be some financial support from them. As it is, the mother should have no right to claim anything from the father especially with the judges comments.
/r/MensRights07/10/17 07:33 AM
8

The same thing women have with a women's only section: privacy, the option to train away from prying/judging eyes. Good grief.
/r/MensRights02/10/17 01:02 PM
2

It's called the Disclosure and Disbarring Service. She may be able to qualify as a doctor but hopefully getting an actual job in the profession will be next to impossible.
/r/MensRights25/09/17 10:01 PM
4

Sorry, see the follow up below: KIA definitely does NOT use bots, and does not ban anyone simply for posting in other subs.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/09/17 05:41 PM
1

https://en.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/71cbzx/meta_mod_question_are_we_running_any_form_of/ Er, nope, waiting on an official mod response but that's definitely not the impression I've ever been given. Can you show some evidence that they do? Edit: Official response from the mods: categorical denial. You need to show some proof.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/09/17 04:54 PM
2

Well I know I do, and I'm left-leaning, but I hadn't heard that ever anywhere else.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/09/17 11:05 AM
11

Since when? Last I heard KIA were more than willing to talk to anyone so long as things stayed relatively calm. I suspect OP above might have done something a little more drastic than "commenting in 2X?" or have things changed in the last week?
/r/PussyPassDenied20/09/17 01:44 AM
14

A big difference is that the cons haven't got any default subs, whereas 2xC is default, world_news is default etc, both leaning very heavily to the left.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/09/17 01:39 AM
5

Opting out of marriage is simple, you don't say "I do". Common law wasn't in place for this so you have to assume she knows her situation, the argument is irrelevant. She was presumably quite happy with the arrangement and living environment, she stuck around for that length of time. If she wasn't happy with the situation then presumably she would have left. As it is, she wanted the payday and didn't get it.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/09/17 10:14 PM
29

What message will this send to other people thinking about lying about being raped? That it's ok to do that and they will probably not face any consequences for their abhorrent behaviour.
/r/MensRights10/09/17 04:49 PM
13

Well that's a joke. There are plenty of left-wing [or as you call them liberal] people on this sub. I'm one of them, I just happen to believe that mens rights have been ripped apart recently. That's it, doesn't mean I vote conservative or anything else. The reason mens rights gets lumped in with the alt-right is because people lump them in wtih the alt-right.
/r/MensRights29/08/17 07:33 PM
3

I would imagine the family sign a consent form for the baby, so this is redundant. Stick with the basic "this is mutilation, it's evil."
/r/MensRights20/08/17 07:05 AM
9

That phrase "survivor of cyber violence" is pretty damn offensive. It's trying to tie-in with survivors of domestic or other violence as if to say she's gone through it too, but in reality at worst she was called a few nasty names by someone on a device that could be turned off at the push of a button, or just put down. It is nothing like what others have to put up with. It's just a cheap way to inflate her reputation.
/r/MensRights03/08/17 08:57 AM
13

The crime is being aware that there might be a different opinion to those subs. Whether you support or oppose the alternate pov is irrelevant, knowing about them violates the purity of the sub and must be purged. Just to be annoying, I'd love to see this place set up a bot to send ban messages to their posters. I don't really want this because eventually quite a few of their readers will get sick of that shit and end up coming here, but it's a warm-glow feeling :)
/r/PussyPassDenied02/08/17 11:15 AM
1

Bah, I thought that was too messed up, ny bad, cheers.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/07/17 05:17 PM
0

I'm not convinced this is legit. If she really wanted to come back the UK govt would let her in in a heartbeat, and then interrogate/rendition her. The only way this is legitimate is if they decided that the PR advantage of keeping her out weighs more than the information she may be able to give us, but I can't see there being any positive PR value, it's not as though people love ISIS here. [yeah, maybe a couple of extremists/radicals, but they aren't likely to hear her being exiled and think "m…
/r/PussyPassDenied31/07/17 05:02 PM
39

A 20-year-old woman has been charged with rape for having sex with a 14-year-old boy in North Carolina after the boy’s mother found out she was in a consensual relationship with her son. 14 years old. consent? eh?
/r/PussyPassDenied25/07/17 07:19 AM
1

I don't see this as a real issue, giving birth is tricky and the recovery from it can easily take 3 months [12 weeks]. I think the idea is that for the first 12 weeks after the birth the father is called on to do a lot for the mother and child, after which she is fit to take over all duties and he can return to work. No it's not equality, but it does make a lot of sense, something quite rare in politics and HR.
/r/MensRights17/07/17 06:15 PM
0

I was previously in the balance about the advantages of appointed and elected judges, pros and cons to both leaving me without a definite preference, but realising that personal politics make a difference in the election process has landed me firmly in the appointed court, pardon the pun.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/07/17 11:37 AM
28

Everyone has an opinion but that wasn't the point, you elect judges based on those opinions. At least try to pick ones who can do the job properly rather than ones who support a candidate.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/07/17 07:28 AM
43

Judge Astacio was elected as a Democrat in 2014 for a ten-year term. You elect your judges based on political preferences? Dear lord, you are weird over there..
/r/PussyPassDenied09/07/17 07:10 AM
9

No, the point was that there are double standards at play when it comes to child abuse. OP sounds a little extreme to me, I'd settle for 20 years inside, same as you'd expect a male teacher to get.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 10:55 AM
3

Bullshit. See the other top posts in this sub as to why. Edit: I'm sure you won't be bothered to look, so I'll hold your hand for you: Is this normal? He is SCREAMING bloody murder and shaking after his circumcision. They told me he wouldn't feel a thing! Does that look like a "good decision", really?
/r/MensRights03/07/17 02:13 PM
2

So not from the same source as the women's FGM one, which is a relief in some ways. I think you may have read this newest last, as this is the most recent one from 2017 in green/red. Thanks for finding this.
/r/MensRights03/07/17 01:58 PM
8

Well the first one is attributed well on the map to the women stats project and it's there on their site. No sign of the second map however, and as such it looks like an unhappy coincidence. It does seem strange that whoever made the second map would use such evocative colouring for not being circumcised.
/r/MensRights03/07/17 04:36 AM
3

Child molestation happens "rarely", terrorist attacks happen "rarely". This is not a good reason to ignore it.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 10:16 PM
66

I love the colour schemes for these maps. Green is all nice n good for the female mutilations, red being evil bad countries! Yet wjhen it comes to the male mutilation map, blue is good and red is evil again right? And yet the evil countries are the ones that DON'T mutilate.. very interesting indeed, I'd love to know the source of both.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 10:14 PM
13

Being a nurse in a civilised country that doesn't force circumcisions on all young boys, I'm curious as to what you mean by that? There are no "chemical imbalances" that are caused by having a foreskin.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 10:07 PM
1

Not sure what you mean by this.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 06:38 PM
1

Women did not invent circumcision. Interesting.. so who did invent it? [please no quoting religious texts, they are incredibly unreliable]
/r/MensRights20/06/17 04:47 PM
13

Why not? They have the same consequences when things go wrong, they are both done for ridiculous and antiquated reasons. Finally, they are both usually done without the consent of the person being harmed. I see a lot of comparisons there, what's the difference?
/r/MensRights20/06/17 04:39 PM
1

Bit uncomfortable with this, all you have to do is put the pics in reverse order and it shows that we have the same flaw.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 12:31 AM
2

I would have thought that it would be easier for OP to get a restraining order with the so-so evidence of the police involved than a conviction for assault.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 11:21 PM
52

Get a restraining order against those two women. Make sure you visit the park frequently with your daughter so she knows it's safe again.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 05:11 PM
7

Given the sheer amount of effort you've gone to in defending her in this thread [and apparently others] you are either the whitest of knights or you are her reddit account. You might not think she's that bad, but I've worked in the health sector for 28 years now and she damn well doesn't belong in it. Just so you understand, being concerned for patient care is not "hating", except in the eyes of the very deluded. She'll get off from the GBH she did which is ridiculous in it's own right, but she …
/r/PussyPass18/05/17 02:07 AM
9

She's not all that talented, unless she was aiming for his leg deliberately. There's a real issue with surgeons being under the influence when operating. The article quotes 15%, this girl is starting from a dependence situation already, before the real pressure starts. It's almost guaranteed that she'll be one of the 15% later on, if she's allowed to get that far.
/r/PussyPass17/05/17 04:37 PM
7

That's the point, she patently doesn't have the skills. She freaks out cannot maintain her calm when under pressure, do you really want her operating on you when she cuts something by accident? edited for clarity
/r/PussyPass17/05/17 04:16 PM
13

punched and stabbed her boyfriend during an alcohol-and-drug-fuelled row This is not a "mistake". This is someone who should never be let near a patient.
/r/PussyPass17/05/17 03:59 PM
2

Discriminating against hysterectomy "survivors"
/r/MensRights04/05/17 11:14 PM
2

She stood on his work.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/04/17 07:54 PM
1

This is abuse on several different levels. The Catholic church has had a huge problem with abuse of children, but even they would struggle to justify this..
/r/MensRights13/03/17 01:25 AM
7

Hysterectomy is removal of the uterus. Slightly more than what's being discussed. I do agree that sterilisation for a woman is more invasive than for a man.
/r/MensRights04/02/17 11:17 AM
8

Sue her? Look at her, do you honestly believe she could afford to pay for the damage she caused even in this short video? Now imagine 10-20 minutes unopposed waiting for the police, how much damage would she cause then?
/r/PussyPassDenied26/01/17 11:37 PM
3

Surely only the few radical feminists stand out, making it seem like a lot of them do it. That's a statement and you're getting downvoted for it. If it was just rad-fems doing it, then where is the backlash from feminists against the rad-fems? Non-existant, that's where.
/r/MensRights03/01/17 04:39 PM
1

The whole point is we want them to choose, we don't want to choose for them. And that's laudable, but your opinion is not the opinion of everyone in education. Obviously others think that students should believe what they are told to believe. That would be the point of the letter in OP obviously.
/r/MensRights23/11/16 05:15 PM
5

The point of a ban would be to stop any student union groups from booking him to speak to them. It's not because I don't want to hear him speak, it's because I don't want you or anyone else to hear him speak"
/r/MensRights23/11/16 04:33 PM
1

You asked where's the punishment? In addition to what I listed and the government coming down on her that you mentioned, there's also the probability of the victim's family being able to sue/take steps as she is now back in their home country.
/r/MensRights17/11/16 07:00 PM
2

The victim was Chinese. She was fined $5k for a kick that didn't contribute to the guys death, deported and is likely to face further problems back in China.
/r/MensRights17/11/16 12:37 PM
34

It's interesting that the ?moderator ignores the woman interrupting but then has a go at the guy taking umbrage at it.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/11/16 02:30 PM
1

Sounds like your argument is with the mother. If the sperm donor requests anonymity then he specifically does not want to be involved after conception and that should be honoured as part of the contract otherwise it shouldn't happen at all. No anonymity = no sperm donation. At the very most, if the child is insistent on wanting to know the donor then a third party could contact the donor on their behalf requesting involvement. If the donor agrees then it goes forward, if not then it stops there.
/r/MensRights06/11/16 07:59 PM
8

What has privacy law got to do with Catholicism?
/r/MensRights06/11/16 07:28 PM
2

Left-wing MRA checking in here, it's almost as though people are complicated and capable of having more than one overarching opinion isn't it :)
/r/MensRights18/10/16 11:17 PM
3

I agree with her, this is not a men's rights issue, and shouldn't really be on here.
/r/MensRights05/10/16 07:26 PM
1

This is saying that one pony is complaining about getting paid less despite the fact that she isnt carrying as much as the other pony. ..... This is arguing that a wage gap is fair.
/r/MensRights03/10/16 10:21 PM
2

You take a few million men and add up their wages. Then a few million women and add up theirs and see the difference. Then you claim that there's some form of discrimination going because there's a difference. You completely ignore the life choices of all involved, you ignore the educational achievements of all concerned, you ignore the ambitions of all in the study. You could as easily blame the difference on the "stay at home" women who want to care for their children. The whole thing is a jok…
/r/MensRights03/10/16 08:48 PM
2

and the mean, and the mode. The idea is still a joke.
/r/MensRights03/10/16 08:24 PM
1

For me I'd rather they have completely different roles, one a coal-miners pit pony, the other just wandering in a field of clover just to get the message across.
/r/MensRights03/10/16 08:21 PM
1

The gender pay gap in the United States is the ratio of female to male median yearly earnings among full-time, year-round (FTYR) workers. So add up ALL full time men's pay, and add up ALL full time women's pay, and spot the difference? Assuming that this makes any kind of sense whatsoever and that it is worth action upon is the real problem here.
/r/MensRights03/10/16 08:06 PM
1

It does, if you look really closely. I don't think many people arguing for the gap as discrimination are going to look that closely.
/r/MensRights03/10/16 08:03 PM
2

A wage gap between different occupations A wage gap between different occupations doesn't exist. It's like arguing that a neuro-surgeon should receive the same pay as a cleaner.
/r/MensRights03/10/16 08:01 PM
2

KISS works better.
/r/MensRights03/10/16 03:22 PM
2

I'm happy with it. There's always going to be outliers, employers who try to mess with the concept, but they get nailed in court one way or another.
/r/MensRights03/10/16 02:50 PM
2

Then stop messing with the terminology and get back to the basic argument, that men and women are paid the same for the same job.
/r/MensRights03/10/16 02:49 PM
2

As far as I can tell there's no issue. No one in my country has demonstrated that 2 people doing the same job for the same employer with equivalent skill-sets for the same hours are earning significantly different pay. Yeah there's a lot of weasel wording in that, but that's because nit-pickers [like you above tbh] require it.
/r/MensRights03/10/16 02:11 PM
4

The point is that arguing that wage really means earnings is a losing proposition I'm not doing that. See above.
/r/MensRights03/10/16 02:01 PM
2

For example, I'm a male nurse. I get paid the same hourly rate as other female nurses in my place of work. That shows no wage gap whatsoever. If I choose to work 70 hours a week then I'll get paid twice as much as a nurse working 35 hours a week. This is what is shown in the arguments supporting a wage gap, that men earn twice as much as women. The image at the top is ambiguous in that it's easy to misinterpret the message. If you look very closely you'll see the male horse carrying boxes indica…
/r/MensRights03/10/16 02:00 PM
7

I acknowledge there is a wage gap That's where we differ, at least in civilised countries that have equality laws.
/r/MensRights03/10/16 01:53 PM
1

It also provides a rebuttal to the common argument that the gender-pay gap exists because women tend to choose less demanding jobs that pay less. That the point you wanted to make? sorry, the article is kinda long-winded
/r/MensRights03/10/16 12:45 PM
7

Just realised you changed the terminology on me. Wage gap ain't real. Earnings gap is real. Women should get off their arses and work more.
/r/MensRights03/10/16 12:36 PM
31

gap between the average woman's earnings and average man's earnings That's the issue. To come up with this garbage they added up a whole bunch of men's wages and compared it to a whole bunch of women's wages and said "Wow, there's a difference". they didn't compare like for like, for example I'm on the same hourly rate as women doing my job. If I work more hours then apparently that's discrimination. Bullshit. As is the wage gap.
/r/MensRights03/10/16 12:03 PM
34

Problem is it acknowledges the wage gap as real, instead of comparing apples to oranges [women working less hours, having less experience etc].
/r/MensRights03/10/16 11:44 AM
734

Probably an unpopular opinion on here, but this is a bad idea. This is arguing that a wage gap is fair. I'd rather show that the wage gap doesn't exist. We can argue about the rest of discrimination like workplace injuries separately. The wage gap myth has gained traction world-wide and this is perpetuating the story, let's not support the opposition.
/r/MensRights03/10/16 11:24 AM
2

And what does that say about women?
/r/PussyPassDenied25/08/16 07:05 PM
1

I think it covers operations, a consent form in that environment would turn a surgery into lawful wounding, assuming it was as expected. IANAL tho :)
/r/MensRights15/08/16 02:47 PM
1

Don't know about you, but I didn't see what came before all this. The judge made it very clear "I'm choosing my words very carefully, you're both idiots". I guess he'd heard enough from them during the hearing to be very sure of that, though at least the father was able to keep it all together during the judgement. He was very right about the mother.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/07/16 09:27 PM
1

Hell no she can't be trusted.
/r/MensRights13/07/16 10:50 PM
12

Extortion? More like "show me you're really committed to this and not just wasting my time."
/r/PussyPassDenied13/07/16 04:00 PM
16

They split because she was cheating, then got back together. After a couple of years she started again and now they're splitting again. She was after a restraining order, judge said no.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/07/16 11:21 AM
1

Not really PPD, he wouldn't do anything to get her out and she knew it. Best bet would have been to drive away to the nearest cop, and get him to get her out there, wherever that might be.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/07/16 09:41 PM
22

Facebook needs to get sued.
/r/MensRights11/07/16 08:59 AM
24

There's a difference. Your comment hasn't been deleted and you haven't been banned. There are more differences, but that'll do for a start.
/r/MensRights09/07/16 05:06 PM
1

I'll bet you 50 internet points that this isn't a mistake.
/r/MensRights25/06/16 12:25 PM
5

Tbh in this case, she hasn't made an accusation against anyone, hasn't accused any specific person of assault/rape. It does sound more like a mental health issue rather than a false accusation.
/r/MensRights16/06/16 08:31 PM
2

Sloppy writing detracts from the overall point: Title IX violations as newly divined by the feds: The Feds are into fortune-telling nowadays? Edit: I'm guessing it was meant to be "as newly defined by the feds"..
/r/MensRights10/06/16 02:43 PM
29

Not actually a private gym, the response was from Camden Council, it must have been at least subsidised by the council therefore a public place.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/06/16 09:13 PM
11

November 2015.. I remember when this was first reported..
/r/MensRights06/06/16 07:25 PM
28

To avoid severe impact, don't rape unconscious women! or any for that matter. Smacks of affluenza.
/r/MensRights05/06/16 07:56 AM
2

You equate anti-feminism with "mysoginist red-pill losers". It's a double slur, I'm not one but plenty of people in here lean towards the red-pill philosophy. I'm also not misogynist. Giving support to feminism with no boundaries is a big part of what caused our current problems.
/r/MensRights21/05/16 06:53 AM
3

If you can't see that feminism as a political force is the major stumbling block in improving rights for men, then there's nothing anyone here can tell you.
/r/MensRights20/05/16 01:12 PM
44

It's appalling that they are innocent yet named, while she is very suspicious but has the right to anonymity.
/r/MensRights09/05/16 08:17 PM
6

New Jersey, not the UK.
/r/MensRights25/04/16 03:55 PM
7

"removed for violating youtubes policy on harassment and bullying" I bet they aren't talking about the guy with the broken face there..
/r/MensRights01/04/16 11:54 AM
1

I sense a successful lawsuit in your future..
/r/MensRights31/03/16 12:03 AM
23

Just the first line of that article makes me want to stop reading: U.S. colleges trying to respond decisively to complaints of sexual assault are getting slammed "Yes, look at the poor colleges that are trying to be good, but the evil menz keep slamming them." Just once I'd like to see a normal news article that portrays men accurately as the ones being sinned against.
/r/MensRights24/03/16 02:47 PM
1

As I said, this may be skewing the way you think about things. Btw, I don't appreciate the putting words into my mouth.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 10:20 PM
1

Tell me, what does an innocent man get called when the verdict's in? Give you a clue, the answer is "not guilty". If the court can't separate the two, then you certainly don't have the right. If you are wondering why you are getting so much push-back on this, this is exactly the same thing feminists say when a man gets a not guilty verdict, in their minds they are all guilty.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 09:35 PM
1

I've read enough of your posts in the rest of this thread to know that you seem to be pretty obsessed with the whole idea, it might be skewing the way you think about things.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 09:12 PM
1

I disagree, neither of them should be named until a guilty verdict is given.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 07:12 PM
2

Yes it does, the accuser is not guilty of false accusations until such time as she is charged, tried and found guilty. This does not invalidate the concern in the post title that the accused get's his reputation ruined while being innocent.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 07:10 PM
2

Not this again.. "not guilty" is the same as innocent. As above, innocent until proven guilty. So he wasn't proven guilty, therefore innocent. It is probably a failing in the system, but for example, I could accuse you of being a liar, a pervert and a thief, and the best you could hope for is a not guilty verdict.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 07:08 PM
10

I've been a RN for 26 years now, this is disgusting.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 11:52 PM
4

What concerns me is the implication that the advocate is there to assist the prosecution. I take the point regarding a "fair trial" being harder to discredit but this seems to move even further away from that, into the realms of "the defence lawyer is there to show how the state is always correct in it's accusations".
/r/MensRights16/02/16 07:39 PM
12

Did I mis-read this? “Providing a service for respondents is equally important to serving the needs of complainants,” she said in an email. “It is vital that the university prove its case against the respondent and that can more effectively occur if the respondent receives assistance in preparing for the meeting with university officials.” They are providing a dedicated service in order to support the case against the accused? Is there any expectation of privacy in consultations with the service…
/r/MensRights16/02/16 02:50 PM
10

Heh, I was banned from /r/feminism for suggesting that women are equally able to propose marriage as men are. Apparently it was an unreasonable sexist comment! That attitude would be "why not".
/r/MensRights07/02/16 11:42 PM
7

Then you really don't understand this sub.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 04:12 PM
24

Have a dv for generalising and talking crap.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 02:00 PM
1

Men with facial hair are sexist.. Very possibly Women with facial hair are sexist Also Very possibly.
/r/MensRights14/12/15 11:44 PM
1

Yes, I have met battered women who are not responsible for violence directed their way, in fact my SO was previously married to an abuser. She is in no way aggressive or abusive, that she tolerates and supports my comments and actions regarding Men's Rights is always a surprise to me. Feminists like to believe that men suffering DV do not exist, don't make the same mistake they do.
/r/MensRights25/11/15 08:43 PM
10

Victim blaming, well done. [the age of consent over here is 16, what it is anywhere else doesn't matter]. The guy was the victim of a false accusation, and you are blaming him for a shitty act by this girl.
/r/MensRights12/10/15 12:02 AM
7

Vote with your wallet, go elsewhere.
/r/MensRights14/09/15 03:58 PM
1

Todays standards? The age of first birth has been rising steadily for years.
/r/MensRights10/09/15 02:08 PM
4

He liked her FB photos, so he broke the restraining order. It's irrelevant that he had a previous restraining order against her, or why it was obtained. The obvious question must be why was he looking at her facebook? I'm a little concerned by this: Police allege in the complaint Bellanco resides nowhere near city hall, which is about 100 yards from Holland’s residence. 100 yards isn't that far away..
/r/MensRights13/08/15 06:20 PM
1

Fair enough, I try to avoid people's post histories, I see too many people getting narked about that. It's good that you understand it's a cop-out though :)
/r/MensRights11/08/15 02:05 PM
5

1 dv for "I haven't got the time to educate you".
/r/MensRights11/08/15 08:37 AM
3

You mean a normal ladies night? Or is that half-price drinks for women?
/r/MensRights02/07/15 06:47 PM
6

You're already in a war with her, you need to catch up. Get a lawyer today.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 04:47 PM
5

/r/keto works really well, I'm down 2 stone since January. Sadly that won't fix the problem you have with a wife who's not willing to stand by you.
/r/MensRights01/04/15 10:04 AM
3

killallmentality?
/r/MensRights31/03/15 11:30 AM
31

If you swing a baby by it's feet then you are trying to hit something with the babies head. Why is the woman not being charged with attempted murder?
/r/MensRights22/03/15 08:10 PM
1

Safe space =/= Free space. Promote the term and relegate safe spaces back to secure psych wards.
/r/MensRights22/03/15 04:40 PM
2

My First [and last] post on /r/fem..
/r/MensRights13/03/15 08:00 PM
2

The rescuing one is legit as well.
/r/MensRights24/02/15 03:57 PM
10

Actually, that sounds sort of familiar, that looney who went on a rampage... Elliot Rodger?
/r/MensRights22/02/15 03:58 PM
2

Waiting for someone to fund it. Pay for it and it will happen.
/r/MensRights09/02/15 12:31 AM
-1

It is a women's issue. As much as female on male rape is a men's issue, then heart disease is a women's issue. [Just because the numbers are less for one sex than the other doesn't mean it doesn't affect them]
/r/MensRights08/02/15 09:33 PM
7

Definitely not this. Whatever issues she has, she has no right to take it out on him, so going back would be a terrible idea. There are plenty of occurrences where violence has escalated from the occasional punch to weapon use, re-read the OP ..could give me a thump on the shoulder but today she started pummeling me because.. The escalation is clear and it's only going to get worse. Cutting ties now is the best option.
/r/MensRights08/02/15 03:13 PM
1

There's a difference here, she is making an accusation every time she says that, you're just making yourself sound like a prat every time you do.
/r/MensRights31/01/15 07:53 AM
1

So for the rest of his life he is now officially "her attacker" and there's sfa he can do to clear his name. That's what is revolting about your position.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 02:05 PM
2

The same one you pulled this It is stupid and wrong to call someone "my attacker" when it has been conclusively proven that you were never attacked by that person. It is NOT stupid and wrong to call someone "my attacker" if that person attacked you, but there wasn't enough evidence to send them to prison. from, when you won't accept a courts verdict. What on earth is he meant to do more than stand up in court and state his case?
/r/MensRights30/01/15 12:49 AM
2

I don't really care if you were born male or female, are trans or cis or whatever. If you have a point of view regarding Men's rights and can express that without frothing at the mouth too much then have at it, you are welcome here. As the sidebar says: The Men's Rights subreddit is a place for those who wish to discuss men's rights and the ways said rights are infringed upon. It doesn't even say you should be sympathetic to mens rights. Interesting huh?
/r/MensRights30/01/15 12:45 AM
3

It is semantics. By your discussion further down, there's no way "her attacker" has any way to prove his innocence, seeing as you won't accept a not guilty verdict as proof of that. This is just an alternative mantra to the feminist "all men are rapists". You're saying someone accused is either guilty, or not "found innocent", and that in all probability he still did it. This is pretty despicable.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 11:54 PM
2

"You do not have to say anything but it may harm your defence if you do not mention when questioned something you later rely on in court. Anything you say may be given in evidence" Catch 22. You shouldn't talk to the police, but you will only get limited use out of anything you don't talk to the police about.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 08:42 PM
26

Record everything. Either tape or video it, and hold onto it for decades.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 01:37 PM
1

The timeline for this article seems a little confusing. It refers to Joan Ruddock as minister for women, who is a Labour MP and served as minister under Tony Blair, who left office in 2006/7. Since there has been a change in government since then the proposed legislation mentioned will not come to pass.
/r/MensRights20/01/15 10:26 AM
3

Disappointed with this, the excuses given aren't enough to justify that level of abuse of power. I'm in favour of enforcing the law firmly against both men and women who break it.
/r/MensRights16/01/15 01:19 AM
11

and I am waiving the statute of limitations on any criminal charges and challenging the woman to file criminal charges against me because if she does she's committed a crime by filing the false charge. Which he is himself removing from the equation, he wants her to file charges so it can be taken and tried in court.
/r/MensRights05/01/15 03:08 PM
1

[–]sillymod [M] 8 points 9 hours ago I will re-approve this thread when you can provide evidence to the claim to the mods. Send us a modmail.
/r/MensRights21/12/14 01:30 PM
2

The last line is the most promising: She pointed out that CPS guidance stated that it should take over private prosecutions for serious offences, and said it would have been inappropriate not to have taken the case on. This shows that the CPS consider false allegations as a serious offence, hope for the future.
/r/MensRights09/12/14 10:07 PM
6

It should be banned for children and anyone who is unable to consent [learning dificulties etc]. Adults who want to go through with it are of course free to do so.
/r/MensRights25/11/14 03:54 PM
2

Presumably lying about anything could be classed as rape, including how old you are, your real hair colour, whether you have children or not and the old favourite, what your weight is. This could get interesting.
/r/MensRights25/11/14 11:34 AM
1

Way to generalise. That makes about as much sense as me saying "I hate Americans, after all it's almost all Americans in r/twoX."
/r/MensRights18/11/14 11:48 PM
2

“We have an obligation to find the truth,” Staebell said. How about fulfilling that obligation before you arrest or charge anyone with a life-changing accusation? If possible Mr Kocalis should sue these idiots for defamation.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 07:27 PM
4

Actually she was correct, most men are scared shitless of any woman with half a brain, most will much prefer a woman with a whole one. Sadly, the OP is kinda limited.
/r/MensRights11/09/14 07:44 PM
3

Absolutely correct. Also this is the first I've heard of that story, and I'm in the UK. What with all the Rotherham and ISIS stuff, I think it got buried.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 10:39 PM
2

Wow, that was beautiful.
/r/MensRights31/08/14 10:18 PM
4

It hasn't turned out anything as yet, he comments lower down that enolja [S] 1259 points 14 hours ago I haven't encountered her yet and I'm not about to knock on her door and take a bullet through the peephole.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 05:10 PM
1

This is poor writing. Publicity and cronyism are ephemeral. Good games are forever. No they aren't. When was the last time anyone here played Doom? Yet that is well within the lifespan of an active journalist. My disgust with the whole situation is purely based on the corruption exposed. A game developer bribed journalists in order to get good reviews of a crap game. I don't care what sex they are. If it was a gay developer and male journalists I'd still be calling for them all to be sacked. If …
/r/MensRights29/08/14 12:45 PM
3

This is heart-breaking. I would love to be able to give you some advice but you need information that is local which I can't supply, so instead I offer you both my deepest regards and best wishes for the future. Possibly if you could get him to express his concerns, either on that site linked above, or in here, then that might alleviate his stress a little. Good luck for the future.
/r/MensRights22/08/14 10:27 PM
13

Gamers as a stereotype are young males, usually insecure over a bunch of things with quite low self-esteem. They are naturally considered easy pickings for feminism, easily brow-beaten or shamed into toeing the line. They due to their age are also an easy source of quotable material/outrage for mainstream feminism. The backlash recently against Anita Sarkeesian and now Zoe Quinn is of the woman bites dog kind of news. It's important to feminist journalism to maintain the previous relationship ra…
/r/MensRights20/08/14 01:59 PM
9

Indeed. Feminism does have a legitimate role to play in the world, but that place is in the middle-east as above. Sadly, that would mean that all the people raking in huge salaries complaining about US and European "lack of equality" would have to up stakes and go somewhere not quite as nice, and on a smaller salary as well. We can't possibly have that, so we get new definitions of feminism to keep the masses happy.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 09:18 PM
1

Yeah, feminism is mostly linked to the left-wing, or in your case the more left right-wing party, that doesn't mean that MRA has to be only right wing though. While I find plenty to be concerned about with that woman's introduction, it doesn't have any relevance to my support of promotion of men's rights. Yeah, it's always interesting to see the different spins that different ideologues put on stories, shows just how much influence individual TV channels actually have.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 08:47 PM
3

Leftist here, not a feminist. Not a totalitarian either. I can't agree with your idea of conservative above, by definition conservative means "averse to change or innovation and holding traditional values.". I suspect it comes from "to conserve", protect or keep something from harm. Those traditional values I guess. Which is fair enough, I'm not after a political argument apart from the "what is your political party doing to help men's rights today?" type. If you can influence your party to supp…
/r/MensRights17/08/14 09:23 AM
1

I support mens rights and am left wing, I see no contradiction in that. The attainment of equal rights has always been a left wing ideal.
/r/MensRights16/08/14 10:18 PM
7

I'm highly uncomfortable with using someone's death to score political points. That's the point imo, she at first does the "bathe in male tears" thing, then when Robin Williams dies [due to a very MR issue I might add] she goes crocodile tears and suicide prevention. She's using his death, trying to get the self-advertising from twitter. The responses are pointing that out.
/r/MensRights15/08/14 09:05 AM
1

It's sad that it needs to be said, but at least they are trying to maintain some kind of decency around this issue.
/r/MensRights12/08/14 03:40 PM
1

This should be a thing.. more so than it already is.
/r/MensRights11/08/14 09:45 PM
1

"Just say No"
/r/MensRights11/08/14 10:58 AM
24

Kudos to this guy, family is important to everyone, men and women alike.
/r/MensRights09/08/14 04:47 PM
3

Re-reading it I may have posted in haste, along with the conversation that went on with the other poster with comments like I wouldn't be surprised if things went too far and the tone led me to misunderstand it. Apologies, it's been a brutal day at work.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 06:11 PM
0

This is a kinda weird post you just made, first off you complain about victim blaming, then in the next breath you practically say there's a good chance he did it anyway? You don't get it do you, he's been falsely accused, the post above and previous describe the traumatic effect of this bullshit, he and OP are the victims here. You can't have it both ways, either victim blaming is ok, or it isn't. duh.. literacy is a good thing, stay in school kids.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 04:08 PM
17

She should walk away with 28 days.
/r/MensRights28/07/14 09:40 AM
1

I wasn't comparing those 2 cases, it was a general concern that men tend to be identified before any charges are officially brought while women like this one have their identity protected despite there not being an obvious reason to do so. The child she harmed is dead, the baby can't be hurt further. The throwaway mention of 2 previous episodes of child cruelty doesn't appear to be enough to allow identification of those children so I don't see any good reason to withhold her identity.
/r/MensRights22/07/14 11:08 PM
2

Definitely a troll, gnite.
/r/MensRights22/07/14 09:12 PM
1

I get what you're talking about, it's incredibly annoying that there seems to be no concerns about naming men in situations like this, but women almost always seem to attain anonymity for one reason or another.
/r/MensRights22/07/14 06:59 PM
3

Hate speech? You took two shots, and got two shots back.
/r/MensRights22/07/14 06:55 PM
4

Obviously a literacy problem. You will do well in the Republicans. [Apologies to all decent human beings and MRA's who actually are in the Republican Party. Except this troll of course.]
/r/MensRights22/07/14 05:27 PM
5

Really? If I wasn't "liberal" I'd be telling you to grow up, be a man, grow some balls and deal with it. Good job I am, aye?
/r/MensRights22/07/14 02:50 PM
22

The teen, who can not be named for legal reasons What reasons? She is over 18 and no other children were mentioned in the report.
/r/MensRights22/07/14 02:18 PM
2

I would imagine the question does get asked. From family, friends, probably the police, and definitely the media if they cover the story, after all a story is so dry without details... tossers that they are. If you mean "She got raped because she was wearing X, Y or Z", then no, I've never seen anything remotely like that.
/r/MensRights19/07/14 11:29 PM
8

Have to love this line: The fact an individual has been targeted in such a way will not be shared with his employer or family,in a bid to stay on the right side of human rights legislation. So they are going to try really really hard NOT to violate human rights legislation, how very nice of them. If I were to receive such a visit, it would be recorded and on the way to the solicitors within 5 minutes.
/r/MensRights19/07/14 11:09 PM
5

Overall it has to be education, all the others pale behind the effect this will have on their lives.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 06:14 PM
0

Hmm, I was assuming that it would be a legal obligation, mandated by law. As soon as you went to court for the first offence, your lawyer would be able to explain it all in detail. If it is separate police department policy then that would make a lot more aggravating sense.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 08:26 AM
2

This is really strange: *The original version of this story referred to Gravens as a registered sex offender. He was actually removed from the public list in 2012 after his case drew media attention. But he remains on the list kept by police and his movement remains restricted due in part to two previous failures to register which still appear as felonies on his record, both of which he blames on being incorrectly informed about reporting requirements. 2 previous reporting failures due to lack o…
/r/MensRights18/07/14 12:06 AM
0

'men think through thinks and women don't'. I'm sure this says something, just not sure what.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 04:55 PM
2

That is what they want, a fair system with oversight, but it is not what they believe we have now. First paragraph of that document: Liberty has long called for changes to be made to the UK’s unfair extradition arrangements. During the passage of the Extradition Act 2003 (EA) we warned that without amendment and crucial safeguards, the Act would act as a blunt and arbitrary instrument and create injustice. I may well be incorrect in this, but as far as I know they have objected to extraditions t…
/r/MensRights06/07/14 03:11 PM
8

To the best of my knowledge, Liberty oppose ALL extraditions, the back-story is not really relevant. Hacker Banker Terrorist
/r/MensRights06/07/14 08:54 AM
0

Why not both?
/r/MensRights06/07/14 08:12 AM
2

Possibly because no one knows about it. That's the first I've heard about it since joining Reddit over a year ago.
/r/MensRights02/07/14 03:01 PM
7

Good, I don't blame them.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 05:11 PM
1

What a mess. Much as I'm loathe to admit it, the Guardian is dead on this time.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 10:17 AM
8

There were indeed uniformed policemen on site, and quite a few black-shirted security guards. I wonder what kind of image they are trying to imply here? out before Godwin's law gets mentioned..
/r/MensRights29/06/14 12:06 AM
7

Conference speakers referred several times on Friday to threats of violence they said they had received, but no protest at the VFW hall ever materialized. Deliberately phrased to make it sound like a false claim, ignoring the fact that it was the hotel where the conference was originally intended to be held at that received the threats. Just one example of pretty biased reporting.
/r/MensRights29/06/14 12:01 AM
12

Great men value great women. This is almost certainly true. Where they go horrendously wrong is assuming that they are great women.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 11:53 PM
1

Carnell Smith was an excellent speaker. Can we adopt the name of cupcake for anyone trying to falsify parenthood?
/r/MensRights28/06/14 04:44 PM
7

And the other half are "wrong, try again" crap. Seems like he's unable to actually state his position, not really unexpected considering he calls himself a feminist.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 04:16 PM
2

I hope the organisers are going to send Mr Futrelle a thank you card for allowing the conference to go ahead without the incessant and irrelevant complaints coming from that side of the tracks. I'm sure his colleagues over there would be overjoyed to see the response.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 02:20 PM
4

give us offspring on our terms, or suffer erasure from the gene pool. Not 100% accurate, generally men remain fertile throughout their lifetimes. If this is the gist of her argument then she is in for a nasty shock.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 08:58 PM
1

Thinking about the meta of the situation, isn't it interesting that nothing happens for a year, then 2 complaints within a week. Then a very strong movement to "encourage" him to resign or at least step down for a time orchestrated by someone who would be a strong contender for a replacement for him. I can't think that he'll have much success as a politician now. Not because this might sit badly with voters, more likely because it will appear to potential sponsors that he has either a lack of se…
/r/MensRights22/06/14 09:47 PM
2

To be, or not to be, that is the question— Whether 'tis Nobler in the mind to suffer The Slings and Arrows of outrageous Fortune, Or to take Arms against a Sea of troubles, And by opposing end them? You're going to suffer the consequences of the actions of others no matter what, would you rather be aware of those actions or not?
/r/MensRights22/06/14 02:28 PM
2

An interesting article, with some curious stats attached to it. three per cent rise in reported rapes the number of rape cases referred by the police to the Crown Prosecution Service for charging decisions fell by a third The number of people charged with rape by the CPS over that period fell by 14 per cent. 700 more defendants have been charged in 2013-14 compared to the previous year Our figures show that the proportion of cases ending in jury acquittals has increased by 4.2 per cent over the …
/r/MensRights22/06/14 02:19 PM
1

Re: The Guardian, I was on there yesterday and they asked me to do a survey.. I don't think they will like the results, it's quality especially with regards to a full on feminist viewpoint has declined significantly these last few years. We could also discuss the Times or the Sun, with their Murdoch-driven agenda, the porn sales of the Express or a variety of other papers and their flaws. I'm not biased against any newspaper, I'm biased against all of them. If they have an agenda outside publish…
/r/MensRights22/06/14 01:47 PM
4

Did you miss the part where I did draw attention to the part that I thought sounded wrong? I'm not a reflex anti-Daily Mail snob, I'm a fully informed anti-Daily Mail snob. The average UK broadsheet isn't much better, but they doesn't usually complain about paedophiles then publish pictures of 13 year olds in bikinis.
/r/MensRights22/06/14 12:56 PM
5

It's the Daily Mail, and sadly that means we can't take it all at face value. This bit sounds off to me: It is believed that she sent Ben a series of messages after the alleged assault. In them she apparently explained that her friends had misunderstood her tears after the encounter – they had assumed Ben had forced himself upon her when, in fact, she was upset about sleeping with him because she had resumed her previous relationship. If he was in possession of messages along those lines then th…
/r/MensRights22/06/14 09:47 AM
1

Factor in that being accused of rape is possibly the most lethal accusation to have made against you, character wise, with the one near-contender being accused of paedophilia. [Rape is better because it doesn't rely on a 3rd party] It's well documented to have incredible adverse effects on the accused, whether justified or not. [Consider the SU president in this thread, people are talking about "no smoke without fire", and that it hasn't been proved that he didn't do it.] Also consider that wome…
/r/MensRights21/06/14 09:47 PM
1

I agree we can't know the numbers. Which is why I find you making a guess kinda strange.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 08:15 PM
1

Any fucktard who spews any kind of bullshit along the lines of "__% of rape allegations are false", be that 2 or 80 percent, is not worth my fucking time. Frankly I believe (educated guess) that it's probably around 16-18% but not crazy common like 40%. There's plenty of arguments as to why an accusation of rape would be much more common than say an accusation of robbery or assault, but with the quotes from you above, there's no real need to make them.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 02:58 PM
2

I'm just wondering, she's obviously completely crackers and quite aggressive. If anyone recognises the area she's in, would it be possible to pass these onto the police there? It's probably only a matter of time before she gets hold of a gun..
/r/MensRights21/06/14 01:28 PM
2

Seems fair to be honest.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 01:19 PM
6

Sure it would be punishable, IF she had bothered to report/record any of the alleged "naggings". That would also have put paid to this child abuse. If she has not, then it's obviously a lie cut from whole cloth.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 07:22 PM
4

There's no defence for her actions, and she knows it. She is trying to spread the blame around to get herself a reduced sentence, no matter how much it might harm someone she was duty-bound to protect. Evil bitch.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 07:20 PM
1

Why don't you ask around in here, or look at the several threads here that list the numbers and reasons of bans over there, you'll see how trivial and petty those mods have been.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 05:02 AM
3

Nope, absolute rubbish. This is why I stressed polite questions in the comment above. Feminism and srs mods ban on sight, with no regard to the validity of any comment.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 09:43 PM
5

There are plenty of examples of people who have made comments in r/feminism and similar subs that have politely asked a question relating to mens rights, and they have been banned immediately without discussion. Feminism is not at all accepting of anyone who doesn't toe the party line.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 09:03 PM
3

Ouch, didn't expect that from your comment.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 02:22 PM
3

I did before commenting, it's all been about the original comment made about Unison. Talking about police in a different country, you might as well talk about police in Africa, it's completely irrelevant.
/r/MensRights15/06/14 11:30 PM
3

This is a UK union, linking US police efforts aren't relevant in this.
/r/MensRights15/06/14 10:06 PM
9

You can disagree all you want, because you haven't been banned from commenting. Feminism relies upon shouting down any objections, whether it be in classrooms, lecture halls, here on Reddit or at a conference in Detroit. They frame themselves as the only purveyors of truth instead of actually discussing the issues, disagreeing with them is a sin.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 04:12 PM
4

She? http://feministing.com/2014/05/30/an-open-letter-to-privileged-people-who-play-devils-advocate/#comment-362302
/r/MensRights14/06/14 04:02 PM
1

I'd say it does indeed suggest a complete lack empathy.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 08:51 AM
3

Can't say I'm impressed with her view, as an attorney she must have realised the situation men are in with Title IX, it would have been much more impressive if she'd said something about it before her son got involved. What about all the students who are accused who don't have a lawyer for a mother?
/r/MensRights10/06/14 03:24 PM
1

The problem is you are running up against real life experience, or at least online experience. You can say how wonderful feminists are till you're blue in the face, but [for example] when I remember how I was banned from /r/srs and /r/feminism for asking a simple inoffensive question then your comments don't hold up to scrutiny. Unless you're saying that these aren't bastions of feminism after all? Oh yeah, Are you all hypocritical jerks (I jest, but maybe you are, Idk)? That's really going to h…
/r/MensRights08/06/14 10:27 PM
6

Might want to re-consider number 5, he's taking the piss.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 10:10 PM
1

There's certainly similarities between how each side views the other. The big difference IMO is that when a feminist comes to /r/MRA they get to make their point. When a MRA goes to /r/feminists they have a ban first then don't think later on policy. Along with plenty of others here I'm willing to discuss issues with feminists. They are not willing to discuss with us. The issue of ending the troubles between the two groups MUST start with feminists being willing to discuss outside of their "safe…
/r/MensRights08/06/14 10:08 PM
2

There's a big difference between being a feminist and supporting equality for women, for example, as a supporter of men's rights I also support equality for women but I wouldn't dream of labelling myself a feminist, the brand is too toxic.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 09:44 PM
1

Good example, Thatcher was a psycho. To be honest though, I can't really criticise this CEO for how she handled herself, the problem appears to come from the TV casters who said she should be a mom first then a CEO. If she had carried on with the whole "I'm a mom" thing, she'd be getting flak for not being strong enough to run a company.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 09:35 PM
6

Both of you need to get help, see a therapist. Hope it works out for you both, but if it doesn't don't keep it going so long that you mess up your kids.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 08:16 PM
2

Sure they die. If we can reduce the chance of that happening by not doing something unnecessary to them, shouldn't we stop doing it? [lots of negatives in that, but you get the idea]
/r/MensRights06/06/14 11:00 AM
6

Did you read the post at the top of the thread, you know, the reason you were in here in the first place? The kid died. This isn't about you or me, it's about automatically circumcising kids when there's no need to and exposing them to a ton of problems, including potentially death. It's like the Michael Jackson baby event, hang a baby over a balcony.. who cares, the baby didn't die.. does that mean you'd do it?
/r/MensRights06/06/14 10:05 AM
1

1/ Fringe, or speaking from personal experience. 2/ The draft is a threat hanging over men's heads. I don't think it's a major concern, but it's an example of disposability. 3/ If anyone fights for excessive protection under the law then they are tacitly calling themselves victims. I don't consider feminists victims but I do wonder about the rest of women who are victimised by feminism. [maybe the wrong phrase that, I refer to the fear-mongering that occurs for eg. when describing all men as rap…
/r/MensRights05/06/14 10:54 PM
1

About the comments: orphicdragon 4 hours ago Club moron putting in over time again. Misandry is not feminism. Declaring "I'm a feminist!" doesn't make it so. I realize that doesn't please the loudmouth nimrods propaganda, but I really couldn't give less of a f**k. I'm a feminist, and f*king proud of it. I'm a lesbian, so I quite literally have zero "use" for fellas. I do not now, nor have I ever felt the "men" were keeping me down. Like many of us less foofy women I've worked with men in traditi…
/r/MensRights05/06/14 08:17 PM
2

Massive Lawsuit time?
/r/MensRights04/06/14 03:53 PM
1

Much as I hate to argue alongside a Piller, why is it so wrong to acknowledge that men and women are fundamentally different? We are, right down to our chromosome count. I'd also argue that different races are again, different. I'm not saying any are better or worse than the others, or that men or women are better than the other. Just that we are different. I don't see anything wrong in accepting and celebrating this. This of course doesn't change the requirements to offer all the same equal hum…
/r/MensRights04/06/14 10:11 AM
1

I'm sure the suffragettes would have been plenty happy with that idea.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 08:47 AM
16

"Oooh, I know, we should ban women from running because they don't have balls. " "No, that would be stupid, we want support from this from everyone, no one would be daft enough to do that." Good luck to everyone, male and female, who participate in this run.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 05:20 PM
1

We do? Sorry, didn't know about that.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 08:59 AM
1

I got dismissed so easily by a good friend Not much of a good friend.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 09:57 PM
3

As soon as you see the title and realise it isn't a joke, then it's time to get off the page.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 08:21 PM
1

are you afraid of walking alone at night? No, because I know I walk in areas which are relatively safe, well lit and have other pedestrians around. Because obviously it would be stupid to walk in an area I know is dangerous. It would be nice to imagine that the whole world would be made safe for me to walk in, but practically speaking that is never going to happen, so I take simple precautions.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 09:23 PM
1

That's your opinion of what it means. There are plenty of others, none of which mention allowing expression of controversial views.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 04:22 PM
3

"Safe space" is a very dubious term to use, it implies that no matter what happens people aren't going to hear anything at all that might not coincide with their own views. I much prefer what we have here now, which is a place to talk/rant/discuss, and if the conversation gets a little over the top people will be called out on it, rather than trying to censor/ban them.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 03:42 PM
22

And I cannot find the hatred or misogyny that is claimed to be on this subreddit. Oh err, sorry.. "must hate women.." bangs his chest with a raw haunch of beef! [Is that good enough?] I don't think people on here hate women at all. They can be annoyed, irritated, aggrieved and generally pissed off by them, but hate? No. It might be helpful to carry this message back to those who believe this is misogyny central, but be careful, feminists will turn on their own if they don't like the message. It'…
/r/MensRights30/05/14 12:06 AM
2

Men in general need to come to a consensus on this subject. Hold on, I'll just get a few billion men to comment on the subject.. Hopefully by now you'll realise just how silly that comment is. It's impossible to get 1 overall viewpoint agreed upon. You get liberal men, conservative men, reasonable and unreasonable men. Exactly the same as women.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 10:19 PM
3

Happens all the time, happened to me in /feminism and /srs. Both times asked a reasonable question, polite and inoffensive, and got banned with no comment or discussion. Then someone from there comes in here and says "not all feminists are like that", maybe not, but their mods certainly are.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 09:47 PM
6

So you're saying if a guy regrets raping a girl, or has a bad experience from it, then it's all ok? Don't be ridiculous. It's rape if he does it, and it was rape when she did it.
/r/MensRights21/05/14 11:14 AM
2

Ahh, I see why OP was concerned now. I've only ever heard it used to mean someone who's pissing you off.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 06:26 PM
6

I've not heard any specific meaning of "creep", what is it meant to mean?
/r/MensRights16/05/14 04:04 PM
1

Time to play 50/50: Troll or imbecile?
/r/MensRights15/05/14 11:30 AM
1

Is he not able to sue the college for unfair practises or somesuch? I'm guessing not, but don't know why not.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 11:23 AM
1

I don't understand why you felt the need to edit out your comment. Unless you realised it was so full of crap you were ashamed for it to be seen.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 12:06 PM
13

Interesting point. So you're saying that while men should sign up for selective service, women should sign up for selective impregnation?
/r/MensRights09/05/14 09:03 AM
3

Could we get some translations for all the acronyms used please?
/r/MensRights04/05/14 03:54 PM
4

Be wary of using the Daily Mail as a news/information source, it's more child porn/sensationalist click-bait.
/r/MensRights03/05/14 08:31 PM
20

http://www.collegehumor.com/video/6966989/the-real-reason-youre-circumcised
/r/MensRights01/05/14 11:28 AM
16

How much pressure does it take to damage an eye? Clue: not much. Whether she inflicted that on him or not, she was trying to hurt him and he has a right to self defence.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 10:36 AM
1

A couple of those issues you mention are legitimate MR issues, I'm glad it is obviously getting easier for you to discuss them. Socialist governments have harmed free speech, as have fascist governments, there is no benefit here to try to play the blame game in one direction or another. [Just fyi, most of the rest of the world considers both political parties in the US to be right wing, just one is more so than the other. One of the biggest problems nowadays for free speech and discussion is the…
/r/MensRights17/04/14 05:13 PM
6

15 MB38 "Put on a condom, you don't know where I've been." Seems quite reasonable, the rest.. dear god.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 04:05 PM
1

Was with you right until the end, what on earth has left or right wing got to do with this? There's been a ton of censorship carried out by far-right governments, it's by no means only a left wing thing. Tbh that was a stupid way to divide the response to this topic.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 09:45 AM
8

Looks planned tbh.
/r/MensRights14/04/14 04:56 PM
6

This should pretty much put the circumcision argument to bed. If it doesn't need to be done for medical reasons, how can you risk your son needing his penis amputating?
/r/MensRights12/04/14 11:36 AM
4

It might not be easy, but if you can't discuss these issues with your current therapist, then you can't work with her either. She is there for you to talk about your issues, this is an issue for you, go to it.
/r/MensRights12/04/14 11:18 AM
1

I've always considered that to be some really twisted fetish, dressed up to make it sound respectable by adding religion into the mix.
/r/MensRights10/04/14 02:14 PM
2

You might be "talking US". I see no reason to be so limited, though I'd think that if you're in the US you might be more concerned with circumcision than elsewhere, seeing as it's so prevalent. (A simple comparison would be the issue of female circumcision [FGM] being a much bigger issue in the middle east than the US for example.) I'm glad you've at least dropped the whole Catholic = circumcised argument, that was pretty bizarre.
/r/MensRights10/04/14 01:25 PM
2

Just because your family has decided to follow the Judaic preferences in order to get along doesn't mean that the rest of the world has.
/r/MensRights10/04/14 08:43 AM
2

Aha, I see, I thought he meant that it was a cosmetic procedure so it wasn't anything to be concerned about, my bad.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 02:26 PM
6

Not sure what you meant there, clarify please? My response was to indicate that cosmetic surgery has been spun so much that people seem to think it's perfectly safe and always a good idea, it isn't. Calling something a cosmetic procedure doesn't magically make it safe, or beneficial to the baby.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 11:44 AM
7

Wall of text, ouch. just to address one of your points seeing as it's come up a couple of times now, an ingrained, emotional, and religious decision in a very religiously ingrained country Catholics, for one, are alienated. No, Catholics have no reason to circumcise their boys. I think you may be thinking of Jewish instead. Considering the vast majority of Americans are Christian, this should not be an issue. [source Catholic]
/r/MensRights09/04/14 11:11 AM
9

Cosmetic surgery is still surgery. Tell a woman her apronectomy is cosmetic and insignificant. It's removing a sexually important part of anatomy. If men want to go ahead with it once they're old enough to decide on it, fine, but to do it on a baby? That's sick.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 10:59 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter