TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Karmaisforsuckers Archive

View 0 posts and 48 comments by Karmaisforsuckers on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Yeah real intelligent people base their whole personality on their $3000 gaming rig and internet memes
/r/PussyPassDenied31/12/18 08:56 AM
1

How would that help what I said?
/r/PussyPassDenied14/12/18 03:40 AM
-1

Getting raped by fat ugly degenerate inbred guards every day probably sucks big time
/r/PussyPassDenied14/12/18 02:11 AM
72

Because theyre as retarded as this woman
/r/PussyPassDenied09/07/17 10:42 AM
-14

Everything from the dailymail, which is the most linked to news sourse here.
/r/MensRights27/01/14 03:04 PM
0

If a group of boys asked to be "serenaded" by a group of "hot senior" girls, that would just seem inappropriate. Hahahahahaha, have you never heard of Cheeleaders? What a fucking retard.
/r/MensRights27/01/14 05:56 AM
2

You must ignore 90% of the news stories on /r/mensrights. The Daily Mail is the most linked to new source on this subreddit.
/r/MensRights22/01/14 02:19 AM
0

Im not a feminist, but if that delusion helps protect you from scary facts that threaten your worldview, youre welcome to it.
/r/MensRights17/01/14 08:32 PM
-4

Because it was one isolated very specific dataset, that was only one small part of a larger dataset, designed to gather information for a specific type of analysis. Trying to extrapolate this one dataset, devoid of all other contextual and supporting sets for this study, to an area far outside the scope of the data gathered, is the very definitions of erroneous. There are literally no qualified statisticians, or even academics, who would use this data to make that claim, as the glaring flaw in t…
/r/MensRights17/01/14 06:46 AM
-4

If you check the source I gave, it clearly states that the NISVS does claim that 1.1% of women were forcefully penetrated in the previous 12 months, and 1.1% of men were forced to penetrate in that same period. That's not what the statistic says. Read it carefully. You're too emotionally invested in your preconceived conclusion. You're, perhaps willfully, missing the very specific wording. because the feminists who advise the NISVS team on such matters Jesus Christ, sorry I tried to engage you a…
/r/MensRights17/01/14 06:33 AM
-7

That doesn't rebut the fact that males were approximately 50% of the sexual violence victims in the 12 months prior to the 2010 NISVS survey. The NISVS response you posted is mostly concerned with errors in estimating perpetrator statistics from the victim data (which the infographic made no claims about). Yes it absolutely does, as nowhere at all does the NISVS make that claim. It's an erroneous extrapolation. It says right in the rebuttal, In fact, Tables 2.1 and 2.2 of the NISVS 2010 Summary …
/r/MensRights17/01/14 05:58 AM
-7

Considering the drastically higher rate of single mother households, and time actually spent with children, Men are actually four times more likely to abuse a child than woman, if you control for time spent with children, and sole custody.
/r/MensRights17/01/14 04:45 AM
-4

Rape: Rape statistics given by government agencies and feminist researchers define rape as requiring the offender to penetrate the victim, meaning that a woman forcing a man to have sex is not included as rape in any official statistics. If the definition is expanded to include this act as rape, then men account for 50% of rape victims, yet receive only a tiny fraction of the funding and support that female victims do. http://www.genderratic.com/p/836/manufacturing-female-victimhood-and-marginal…
/r/MensRights17/01/14 04:35 AM
1

Were some of their policies and advocating efforts purposefully hiding and diminishing problems for boys? Yes. Are you just pulling that out of your ass? Who specifically lobbied for what? No cop out, Give me a name or a person or an organization, and tell me what they specifically lobbied for and when.
/r/MensRights17/01/14 04:25 AM
4

Well, Im not an MRA.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 08:02 PM
58

There's literally no evidence at all presented here. No court documents, no police reports, nothing to support his claim in the slightest /r/mensrights has a history of getting duped in cases like this.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 05:03 AM
-43

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha They have reserved seating at the front for the disabled and elderly, too. GAWD, this is like the holocaust + slavery X A MILLION. Literally no one has ever been as oppressed as you are by this. I don't know how you could even leave your house with the crushing weight of this injustice on your shoulders.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 05:11 AM
-26

An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. I'm sure there's still going to be some poor girl in the back of a dark buss for you to creep on, though. So don't feel too oppressed.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 05:01 AM
-25

Uhhh they did... This is that. That is what this is. The thing you said they should do is what they did.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 04:51 AM
-30

Not as common, and can't be solved with reserved seating in a well lit area. How would male only seats help men from being hit by men? People will still fight at the front of the bus, but creeps are less likely to feel safe enough to grab a woman closer to the driver and camera.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 04:34 AM
-42

It's because women would get sexually assaulted by drunk men in the back at night. Completely reasonable.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 04:24 AM
-3

How is four months a worthwhile amount of time to someone who enslaved another human being and beat them daily? Because she didn't do that? Her husband and son did... Remove the gender and you have 3 people. One got 4 months, one got 6 years and one got 4 years. How is that valid? Because they are three different people, who had three differing levels of complicity? Seriously, children don't have this much trouble grasping this concept... This is like
/r/MensRights09/01/14 04:00 AM
-8

...she got four months... Reading comprehension sure is a rare skill in this subreddit.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 02:46 AM
-4

It's interesting that all the groups actually working to help Male victims of prison rape are totally unaffiliated with the MRM...
/r/MensRights09/01/14 01:11 AM
-10

The woman who was equally culpable Actually, is was just shown in a court of law that she wasn't, but don't let logic or facts get in the way of raging at women for imagined slights.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 12:55 AM
-3

The privilege of not committing crimes?
/r/MensRights07/01/14 02:47 AM
-4

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha irony
/r/MensRights05/01/14 01:57 AM
-12

Woah, talk about draconian censorship. I though the MRM respected free speech?
/r/MensRights03/01/14 06:01 AM
-3

Sorry for trying to raise MRA activism to the level of reality. That's like tying to bring a shadow into the light.
/r/MensRights02/01/14 12:56 AM
0

That is an outright lie. Thank you for your inquiry regarding the NISVS data and for providing the background information pertaining to your question. It appears that the math used to derive an estimated percentage of female rapists that you found at the various websites you forwarded to us is flawed. First, we will summarize the assertion and what we perceive to be the basis for the assertion. According to the web links, the “40% of rapists were women” was derived from these two steps: 1) Combi…
/r/MensRights02/01/14 12:37 AM
7

But let's all take Erin Pizzey's word that she received tons of death and bomb threats directly fro feminists! Even though those are serious criminal allegations that would have been investigated by police, and so copies of police reports could have been easily attained to prove the validity of any of it. But no, no evidence required there.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 05:49 AM
-10

You're still peddling your outright lies, huh? Thank you for your inquiry regarding the NISVS data and for providing the background information pertaining to your question. It appears that the math used to derive an estimated percentage of female rapists that you found at the various websites you forwarded to us is flawed. First, we will summarize the assertion and what we perceive to be the basis for the assertion. According to the web links, the “40% of rapists were women” was derived from the…
/r/MensRights10/12/13 04:30 AM
4

The Daily Mail is a poisonous rag, I really wish this sub would stop biting. Dude, The Daily Mail is the most linked to news site on this subreddit. /r/mensrights is The Daily Mail
/r/MensRights09/12/13 03:37 AM
1

. Women are 4% to 7% more likely to be sexual abuse victims than men. Women are 40% the perpetrators of rape. That's demonstrably false Consistent with literature in the area (Sable et al., 2006), both police and victimization data indicate that rates of sexual victimization are higher among females, regardless of the type of sexual assault experienced (Table 3). The 2004 GSS show that sexual victimization rates for females were almost 5 times the rate for males http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/85f0…
/r/MensRights07/12/13 12:25 AM
-37

Sometimes when my husband tickles me or puts cold hands on my back, I'll slap his chest or arm. I know he won't hit me back, and he told me I need to stop doing that. He asked what I would think if he hit me like that? He's right; I'm wrong. Actually, according to /r/mensrights logic, since he put his hands on you, that's assault, and you're well within your rights to give him some equal lefts. The problem is you're not hitting him hard enough. Punch him through some plate glass, or cave his sku…
/r/MensRights28/11/13 01:10 AM
0

you guys should be able to Google on your own. But they don't want to help men find the resources they need. They want to lie to men, tell them they're alone and no one will help. They want men angry, so they can turn that anger into hate.
/r/MensRights20/11/13 03:03 AM
5

manda Marcotte has written an article for men It's for MRA's, not 'men'. Unfortunately you're arguing against a strawman.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 02:33 AM
-13

He believed 9/11 was an inside job and the moon landing was fake while a grown ass man. This is who you guys think is worth listening to? MRA #1 LOGIC BRO. This is totally who you should listen to.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 05:56 AM
0

Woods vs Shewry Ah. Interesting, though This ruling will have very little practical effect on anything. As the court noted, the large majority of publicly-funded DV services in California are already gender-neutral.
/r/MensRights28/09/13 05:02 PM
-1

What? That never happened...
/r/MensRights28/09/13 06:08 AM
-25

You realize that many of the people at AVfM knew Earl personally? And I hope they feel guilty as hell for actively reinforcing his mental illness, which ultimately led him to take his own life. “Mr. Silverman appears incapable of coherent and rational problem solving with government or community partners,” Maria David-Evans, the exasperated deputy minister of Alberta Children’s Services wrote in a formal response to one of his suits. “This is clearly not because of discrimination or gender bias …
/r/MensRights02/06/13 03:21 AM
0

That "critique" does not apply to the CST-2. Yes, it does. Other methodological issues with the CTS include that interobserver reliability (the likelihood that the two members of the measured dyad respond similarly) is near zero for tested husband and wife couples. That is, the chances of a given couple reporting similar answers about events they both experienced is no greater than chance.[25] On the most severe CTS items, husband-wife agreement is actually below chance: The CTS is fundamentally…
/r/MensRights28/04/13 01:22 AM
1

Here's a paper by one of the seminal researchers in the domestic violence field Just like Ron Paul is the seminal researcher in Economics! Critics of the CTS argue that the scales count acts of violence but do not provide information about the context in which items occur (including the initiation, intention, history, or pattern of violence) and therefore may misrepresent the characteristics of violence between partners. A major criticism is that the CTS does not include sexual assault in its de…
/r/MensRights28/04/13 12:14 AM
6

http://www.reddit.com/r/AnalyzingReddit/comments/14xtbr/whiterights/
/r/MensRights22/02/13 12:30 AM
-6

She's wrong about the 95% of perpetrators are Men stat. It's 97%. While females are disproportionately the victims of sexual offences, males are disproportionately the accused. According to 2007 police-reported data, 97% of persons accused of sexual offences were male, higher than the representation of males among persons accused of all other types of violent crime (78%) http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/85f0033m/85f0033m2008019-eng.pdf It's undeniable
/r/MensRights20/02/13 10:22 PM
2

I'm sure this super important FORUM ADMINISTRATOR will be included in this decision making process. The CEO will probably call him up personally, so he can advise him.
/r/MensRights07/02/13 06:28 AM
-50

He raised them for 12+ years. They're his children.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 11:03 PM
-52

In a proper society she would not be rewarded for her deceit. A proper society would punish his children for her deceit.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 09:16 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter