TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Kawakji Archive

View 0 posts and 48 comments by Kawakji on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

Public derision. The truest test of one's principles is when it comes time to decide whether to apply them with the same amount of fairness to one's opponents--theoretical, or otherwise--as to one's fellows. Despite the fact that we're exposed to just how dishonest and malicious those who use false rape accusations as a weapon can be, we can't let our anger blind us and trick us into the presumption that ALL accusations are false. There are going to be accusers who are legitimate, and in some pl…
/r/MensRights24/05/16 11:05 PM
3

Hey, to be fair, it's an unwise position for us to endorse the removal of anonymity for the accuser. It's a good thing, on the whole, I would think, as it protects the innocent who have a legitimate accusation to bring. Now, if only the same protections were extended to the accused for the same reasons.
/r/MensRights24/05/16 09:23 PM
8

How absurd would this sound, were the tables turned? "He sexually harassed us!" "Lol, they just jelly." "Sounds legit, I'm convinced."
/r/MensRights23/05/16 05:14 PM
4

I think it's actually a pretty cool look. He reminds me of one of my more eccentric professors.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 08:27 AM
6

Now that sounds like academic grievance statement material.
/r/MensRights04/05/15 08:04 PM
4

The power a professor wields is such that it might be more prudent to keep your head down and instead prepare a very well-worded and well thought out review of the class for when assessments are parsed out at the end of the semester. I don't know about your school, but where I'm from those get read by the people who determine whether or not to tenure someone.
/r/MensRights04/05/15 07:02 PM
0

I don't know why you're being downvoted. Having the Men's Rights movement associated with a bunch of suicidally ignorant right wing demagogues would actually do us much more harm than good.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 11:28 AM
3

Ah, I just have them tagged as "from r/feminism". And, looking more closely, from againstmensrights, actually.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 11:26 AM
1

I swear I see one of these in every other thread. Should we be reporting these? Do they constitute advertisement? Spam? They're certainly unhelpful and misleading.
/r/MensRights28/11/14 02:39 AM
75

I wonder if he can bring a civil suit against her for damages, or something.
/r/MensRights17/10/14 12:48 PM
4

About damn time.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 05:56 AM
3

I think this might be a bad idea. While 2X can be a bit odious at times, I'm sure the entirety of the userbase isn't so. It's the problem of vocal minorities in comparison to chill lurker majorities, and it's the same reason why MensRights often looks to outsiders like a den of scary misogynists; why it's so easy to paint it as such. At the very least, they aren't a sub dedicated to hate speech and discrimination, like SRS or WhiteRights. I don't think this would be a good way to further our fig…
/r/MensRights07/09/14 07:27 AM
3

I liked the part where the language and examples portrayed men as evil and reform as misogynistic!
/r/MensRights03/09/14 10:59 PM
8

It kinda reminds me of old-timey characterizations of feminists from publications during their movement's infancy, to be honest. Take, for example, this gem: http://i.imgur.com/T9Fgoqy.jpg Notice the lack of any relevant criticism in favor of blatant, slack-jawed pandering to sexists. It isn't necessarily that the people who make this sorta thing particularly feel this way, even- rather, it's that they know it sells very well. Clickbait, in modern terms. Kinda ironic to see it so often employed …
/r/MensRights01/09/14 05:17 AM
12

http://np.reddit.com/r/Feminism/comments/2f3ef6/why_arent_more_feminist_blogs_discussing_the/ Sure is empty in here.
/r/MensRights31/08/14 07:36 PM
2

The final point undermines the credibility of the whole article, really.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 03:11 PM
5

Well, no harm in calling your doctor and attempting to clarify things, no?
/r/MensRights20/07/14 09:15 AM
5

"Let's disprove that feminists are hysterical over-reactors... by doing EXACTLY THAT." Sad that there are tons of nutjobs who get away with controversial opinion pieces and carry on just fine and dandy, but this guy gets fired over this. If the whole adage of "To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize" has any merit to it, this incident certainly points some damning fingers.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 11:47 AM
1

Don't links need to be np links here?
/r/MensRights04/06/14 02:18 AM
2

I don't know, man. Censorship is bad, and if this sub employs it I can't agree with that, but being able to win or lose a live debate doesn't prove anything in particular about the validity of your argument past your skills in debate. Arguments on paper are important because you've the time to consider things, double check things, investigate sources, the like. It's harder to MISS things. Saying "LIVE debate" is the be-all-end-all is silly, since you could, say, get together an adroit debater to…
/r/MensRights30/05/14 12:10 AM
1

Well, the comments section has already pretty much eviscerated the author for her manipulative tactics and use of false equivalences. Good on them. Amnesty'll never consent to the Nordic model, though, methinks.
/r/MensRights22/05/14 11:08 PM
8

"...A miserable little pile of secrets! But enough talk, have at you!"
/r/MensRights26/04/14 05:12 AM
3

I'm sorry that addressing your statements one by one in an orderly manner somehow lowered my worth as a human being to you. It must have hurt terribly, considering I don't merit a response, to have to condescend to responding so as to get the last word in to save face. I don't think I've a desire to debate with you anymore either, considering that someone who thinks of their ideas as being unassailably true, and even refers to them as such, cannot be debated with.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 03:55 AM
6

feminist commentators never seriously advocate for death of all men. DEFINITELY not on reddit I'm sorry, but are you wearing blinders? It happens every damn day. Is it only not serious for them when they do it because they're feminists, and always serious for MRA's because they're MRA's? Are you listening to yourself? Feminist groups openly oppose the MRM because it is so often reduced down to trivial things. I'm not going to lie, feminists often do that too, but MRM seems to take it a step fart…
/r/MensRights24/04/14 10:19 PM
5

No one calls out feminist commenters when they advocate for the death of all men in other subreddits, even when they receive a bunch of upvotes. Every movement is going to have some people who go too far and say stupid things which a scant few others will agree with- but in neither the case with the aforementioned misandrists nor the misogynists to which this Futrelle fellow refers do such comments likely reflect the feelings of the sane majority. The only difference in the two situations is tha…
/r/MensRights24/04/14 07:30 PM
6

I like the part where he responds to allegations of the MRM's detractors taking whackjob quotes out of context to paint the entire movement in a bad light by... taking whackjob quotes out of context to paint the entire movement in a bad light. I wish there were some way we could view sites like these without giving them traffic hits and therefore encouraging them. :/
/r/MensRights24/04/14 10:54 AM
2

Man, I want to agree with you, but as someone who has tried to take a dispute over academic integrity to a councilor I trusted as a prelude to taking it to the chairperson of the college under which the class in question fell, the answer I received was a definitive, "Your funeral." Uni ain't a safe place to have unorthodox opinions any more than the floor of the RNC is. Makes me glad that letters to the editor can still be submitted anonymously.
/r/MensRights21/04/14 01:33 PM
8

This is kinda insidious. By not deleting it but somehow making sure it doesn't appear on the front page any more, subs like /r/undelete won't pick it up, so the censorship isn't initially apparent.
/r/MensRights21/04/14 05:17 AM
3

I'm frankly surprised that this was even allowed to be published. Good on them for letting him speak.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 10:05 PM
4

Damn this thread got a lot of animosity quick. I know the OP is a SRS poster, so it's easy to jump to the conclusion that they're just here to kick up a shitstorm for an easy karma repost there later, but damn. I'd posit to you, OP, that many of us really haven't a problem with feminism as a movement, so much as a problem with many of its more radical elements and philosophies; that said, it's easy to get sloppy and lazy and just say "FEMINISTS" when we really mean "misandrists", which only serv…
/r/MensRights08/04/14 02:33 PM
1

Christ, one of these entries compares the MRM to the KKK.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 05:28 PM
7

Any attempt to address an issue affecting men in a feminist group on campus would probably get you both thrown out and upbraided for showing "your hurt man feels", anyhow. Why do they think men would even bother to try to create groups of their own if they hadn't already exhausted any possible equivalent furnished by society?
/r/MensRights03/04/14 04:27 PM
2

I sure do love how she takes Taranto's car crash analogy and says, "The failure of this analogy should be self evident" in lieu of an actual explanation as to why it's wrong.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 08:01 PM
1

What I'd really love to see is some organized resistance to their tactics. Radfems getting together in groups and dressing up to conceal their identities, pulling fire alarms, then retreating? Get enough people together to physically post someone at every accessible fire alarm in the building. They're cowards. Actually force them to go THROUGH someone to perpetrate their acts of censorship and I've little doubt they'd quail at the prospect, especially since doing so would exponentially increase …
/r/MensRights07/02/14 05:00 AM
66

Charging a fee from the victims of criminal protesters to compensate for the fuss caused by said protesters. Classy. I'm surprised they didn't just come out and call it a "discouraging fee".
/r/MensRights03/02/14 05:43 PM
2

A MISERABLE LITTLE PILE OF SECR- wait are you trying to get me to accidentally spout radical feminist rhetoric you rapscallion
/r/MensRights23/01/14 06:13 PM
0

I'm not sure if it's a wise or fair decision to move so quickly to demonize a fellow on the whole simply because he doesn't share the same opinion on one issue. Wil's always struck me as a good guy. He bashes on Republicans, so he can't be all bad.
/r/MensRights21/01/14 08:10 PM
1

Ah well. Me neither, really. Good luck, in any case. I've lost some good friends over philosophical differences.
/r/MensRights27/12/13 05:05 PM
22

Y'know, using the sandwich line really is in bad taste. Just sayin', that's a quick way to get someone to just tune you out, regardless of the merits of your argument.
/r/MensRights27/12/13 04:42 PM
7

http://www.jesusradicals.com/calendar-grrlz/ I wonder if someone could lodge a complaint with the company their domain name is registered under? I know there're lookup sites that let you see that sorta info for free. Maybe they could do something, like turn them out and force them to find another place to host their site, since they're essentially admitting to illegal activity and promoting others to copy them.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 09:47 AM
2

Sad thing is, I'm already pretty sure how this thread's going to get sold on SRS and againstmensrights. Probably something along the lines of, "MRA's find article saying battered women should defend themselves. Immediately ask, 'Does this mean I can kill my wife?'"
/r/MensRights11/12/13 01:08 PM
1

Look, I don't like the idea of a rapist going unpunished because the law has been remiss in its duty to do so any more than anyone else, if that is indeed the case. But if you have a powerful institution like a University punishing people when the law has found them not guilty, then you've developed a very weird presumption of guilt and a frankly sexist presumption as to whose testimony carries more clout in a situation. I used to think that, perhaps, the development of independent University "c…
/r/MensRights30/11/13 05:22 PM
8

That does make things a bit clearer, even though the offending sentence is still pants-on-head retarded (and no, it isn't comparable to plagiarism, u/stopsayingfaggot, because plagiarism is within the capabilities of an educational institution to definitively prove). It -is- worrisome that athletes might be getting a free pass from law enforcement because of some good ole' boys club type mentality. I don't think it's the place of the University to mete out punishment unless the law finds him gui…
/r/MensRights30/11/13 10:20 AM
1

Yeah, it's... not really a place where you want to actually post anything. Mostly I go there out of a perceived intellectual obligation to hear the other side of a debate. They even make salient points, every once in a blue moon.
/r/MensRights13/10/13 01:58 AM
0

It's really fascinating to see the different directions which this same article took when posted both here and in r/againstmensrights. Like, I'm not being facetious, it's actually pretty interesting.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 05:58 AM
–

Perhaps she's having a hard time coming up with the money because she's disabled? That kinda stereotyping is kinda fucked up though, yeah.
/r/MensRights06/09/13 03:25 AM
2

I don't know, man... it doesn't seem like this article was trying to belittle male genital mutilation or anything. Isn't it a good thing for inter-gender relations if we know our way around each other's junk?
/r/MensRights01/09/13 07:56 PM
4

Tell us how it goes after you're done, no?
/r/MensRights28/04/13 07:49 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter