TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

KelinciHutan Archive

View 0 posts and 43 comments by KelinciHutan on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

OP is misspelling “oneitis.” Consistently, though. Inasmuch as one can misspell a made-up word for “having a crush.”
/r/ExRedPill05/08/19 08:30 AM
13

The going hypothesis is that women in the western world are socialized to be more social than men, develop deeper and more permanent non-romantic relationships, and express their emotions more freely. As a result, when faced with emotional set-backs—like a break-up—women have a better support system to help them deal with the loss. As far as missing an ex, it’s useful to remember that married men report greater happiness than married women. And one of the commonly held reasons for this is probab…
/r/ExRedPill29/07/19 02:34 AM
19

Women give sex and men have to earn it. No more than men give sex and women have to earn it. This is true both ways. I can't get random sex from whatever man I want. If men are worthy for a short-term fling, they are more "chosen" than a man chosen for a relationship - a man who gets sex without commitment is superior than one who needs to commit or show explicit signs that he wants to commit. Absolutely false. I don't sleep around, so men who won't commit are absolutely useless to me (romantica…
/r/ExRedPill27/06/19 07:25 PM
13

Soft ghosting a girl after you’ve slept with her is a reasonably guaranteed way to hurt her very badly. Even for someone you’re “only” friends with, have you liked it very much if they just vanished and you never knew why? If you’ve already told her where you’re at, you don’t need to keep saying it. Just be friends with her, if that’s what you want, and let her feelings be her job unless she chooses to bring them to you.
/r/ExRedPill24/04/19 07:51 PM
18

I don't think there's ever a time when two people feel exactly the same way at exactly the same time. It sounds like you've been honest with her, are concerned for her well-being, and haven't done anything she told you not to. There's no sure-fire guarantee to make sure nobody gets hurt. But it doesn't look like you're doing anything to intentionally cause anyone pain.
/r/ExRedPill24/04/19 07:38 PM
20

It’s bull. Not because women never reject anyone, but because men reject people too. This “law” assumes any man will always and in every case be DTF with any woman. Always. Which, aside from being false on its face, is a nasty thing to even think given how hard it already is for men to come forward if a woman has raped them.
/r/ExRedPill01/10/18 11:49 AM
4

I literally quoted you the place where you said that. The advice you’re looking for isn’t grounded in reality, so yes, you are wasting your time looking for it. If you’re having trouble talking to your wife, you need to ask her to explain herself instead Of fluttering around trying to Decode The Mysteries Of Women.
/r/ExRedPill25/07/18 07:49 PM
5

Do women have nothing uniquely in common with each other that can be learned from? No. No, we don’t. Besides physical structure, there is nothing universal that applies to every woman. Not any single thing at all.
/r/ExRedPill25/07/18 06:29 PM
1

Run a whole bunch of lyrics videos for songs you like. Redirecting the algorithm and getting some bops on at once. :)
/r/ExRedPill19/07/18 01:58 AM
1

You’re not replying to anything I said. Or, if you are, you should maybe quote the part of my post you’re replying to instead of something somebody else wrote.
/r/ExRedPill07/01/18 11:25 PM
12

White women were the best until they attached their identity to lesser women of lesser cultures, they're no longer datable because they hate themselves. I've read this sentence three times and I still can't figure out what it means. Other than that the author is so racist that he's probably well on his way to shriveling up into a raisin of hate.
/r/ExRedPill09/12/17 09:38 PM
3

Speaking as someone who is a Reformed Christian, a woman, and a feminist, please disregard all the comments from the secularists in the thread. I don't really agree with some of your points (a woman's capacity for love is no greater or lesser than a man's, nor do women have any innate desire to be provided for that any other human being would not share because who wouldn't like to have someone else paying the bills, TBH?), but that's a slightly different debate. The main thrust of your argument …
/r/ExRedPill07/11/17 02:01 AM
5

You’re not God, either. Deal with your humanity, because it’s the only state of being that you have.
/r/ExRedPill25/10/17 11:17 AM
9

First off, you're not God. No man is. No human is. Face reality and walk on the ground like the rest of us. Now, as far as "you can never show weakness around women" of course that isn't true. It's absolutely 1000% false. I would never, ever date someone who was always superior and perfect and had everything together all the time. That isn't real, I'd know it isn't real, I'd know he was lying, and I'd leave. Maybe not at first, but I'd get around to it sooner or later. However, I also wouldn't d…
/r/ExRedPill25/10/17 01:37 AM
1

Nothing is final until you're dead. Having said that, having sex hasn't really changed you. In your own words, " I have a gf now and side chick she doesn't know about. Basically I changed my mindset because I started getting laid, not the other way around." You didn't change your mindset. You don't respect either of these women. You are lying to both your girlfriend and this other woman, consistently, and you don't even seem to feel bad, let alone be trying to stop. That is not how you treat peo…
/r/ExRedPill20/10/17 01:22 AM
3

This is a case of how patriarchy hurts men, justice, and society in general. No, don't squawk and whine. You asked for an answer, don't complain when you get one. Society has a general belief that men are "supposed to be" tough and hard. Women are "supposed to be" wimpy and soft. So, believing that men have these negative traits of being overly violent and easily provoked, when a man commits a violent crime, a harsh punishment seems logically required to overcome the natural male tendency toward…
/r/ExRedPill20/10/17 01:11 AM
4

This. RPW is a slightly nicer presentation of the same flawed philosophy that TRP/MGTOW clings to. OP, "red pill" is not true, and it's causing you harm. Your plan to quit all this stuff entirely is a good one and you should stick to it.
/r/ExRedPill04/10/17 12:40 AM
5

You word-vomit badly punctuated five-paragraph essays at us every time you even look at a keyboard, but I'm the wordy one? Yeah, you're right, we can't debate. However, what's wrong with "priest talk?" I thought you TRP/MGTOW dudes were supposed to love religious women. You always claim it gives us a moral center. Or are you just uncomfortable to find that maybe we look at you and apply the same moral center? And, for the record, Galileo Galilei is famous for demonstrating that the Earth orbits …
/r/ExRedPill02/10/17 01:30 PM
18

You have made it impossible for anyone to present you with a rational argument you will believe. I completely agree with mgtow philosophy because its logical and makes sense, not because i want to hate someone. With statement, you elevate your own experience as the only possible true and accurate one. Anyone who has different experiences, you have now given yourself permission to dismiss as either an outlier or illogical/irrational and incapable of understanding “The Truth.” You ensure here that…
/r/ExRedPill02/10/17 10:30 AM
1

No, if you actually do feel love for someone, it is not cruel to tell them so just because it is non-romantic love. If you took them out on a candlelit date, gave them roses, and told them you loved them, then yes, in a circumstance like that there would be a very valid case for deliberately leading this person on. However, you genuinely love someone and say so, that's exactly what people keep saying everyone should do: you're being honest about your feelings. If a woman says that, and she reall…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 01:16 AM
1

I mean, yes immoral actions can be compared. But that doesn't justify them. Stealing is not as bad as murder, but stealing is still wrong. I haven't really bothered to pin down where on the slidey-scale of "telling someone they look great when they have a broccoli in their teeth" to "committing genocide and laughing about it like a Saturday morning cartoon villain" cheating happens to fall. Closer to broccoli than genocide. But it's still really bad. I'd still dump any man who cheated on me. It'…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/17 03:39 AM
13

IIRC, there are people who have run the numbers and the percentage of success employing game is roughly equal the percentage of success of just asking that same number of girls out. Possibly worse, but I don’t remember the exact breakdown or whether the deviation fell within statistical normal. And while you’re right that TRP does seem to produce oddly committed converts, this does make a sad sort of sense in a self-fulfilling-prophecy sort of way. TRP encourages its members to withhold affectio…
/r/ExRedPill24/09/17 04:16 PM
5

A lot of it is strange and rests on believing many untested assumptions. But, from the way the title is phrased, is there some aspect in particular—other than “hamstering” or the alpha/beta false dichotomy—that jumps out at you?
/r/ExRedPill24/09/17 11:58 AM
3

And since everyone here has been recommending either honestly confronting the problem or making a clean break and leaving, that makes all this "but sometimes people are sneaky!" protesting about you. Plus, considering OP has already spoken to her husband, any further recommendations on your part are superfluous. This is your personal issue. You're looking for other people's words to twist to pretend that it isn't.
/r/ExRedPill21/09/17 12:59 PM
11

We're straying from the point of this thread. So I will leave my reply at saying only that if someone cannot choose to make the wrong decisions, they cannot choose the right ones. If you take away someone's ability to make a choice, then you have destroyed the chance for them to trust you. No matter how much they might be honest after that point, that is not a choice, that is coercion. And no amount of "I have been hurt in the past" can ever justify hurting others in the future.
/r/ExRedPill20/09/17 04:53 PM
15

"It would be more in the sense of leaving the women involved with no other choice then be sincere..." Okay, so there are two problems with this. First, as you mentioned, just because being honest and sincere is the best choice, that doesn't make it the only choice. Second, and this one is the big problem, why would anyone want a relationship where they knew their partner was only honest with them because they had to be or else suffer the consequences? In fact, let me elaborate a bit. My mom was …
/r/ExRedPill20/09/17 01:35 PM
19

Dude, that doesn't mean TRP "makes women honest and sincere." That is not remotely a logical conclusion at all. Or even in the neighborhood. TRP doesn't "make women" do anything. Period. A bunch of guys filling each others' heads with buzzwords about AWALT does not effect anything outside those men's skulls. Let alone how a whole half of the planet behaves. I advise honest and sincerity, in the main, because that is usually the best strategy for a healthy relationship. Now, if your partner is ab…
/r/ExRedPill20/09/17 12:52 PM
17

No. Not even a little bit. In fact, I'm very confused about how you could possibly think that was implied at all. Elaborate?
/r/ExRedPill20/09/17 12:02 PM
7

Having read some of your elaboration in the comments, I have to echo the concern other folks are expressing. Please be sure you are safe in your chosen course of action, whatever you decide to do.
/r/ExRedPill19/09/17 11:37 PM
66

All of the following is written with the assumption that you are not in physical or financial danger. If you are, do what you need to get to safety. Immediately. However, if you're not... I'm gonna be honest with you, and you are probably not going to like it. Running a secret test on him to decide whether or not to salvage your relationship is a tremendously poor strategy. It's dishonest, it's confusing, it will validate all the crap TRP fills its victims' heads with about women... There's just…
/r/ExRedPill18/09/17 01:14 PM
4

Thank you. For speaking up for decent theology in response to the first commenter's truly terrible variety.
/r/ExRedPill09/09/17 09:35 PM
5

Because TRP is a non-specific ideological system. Harassment, torment, demeaning, and bullying all require specific, particular targets. THIS IS NOT A DEFENSE OF THE RED PILL. What I am defending is that enforcement of rules/policies/laws should be those policies as established, otherwise you're just making things up as you go along. So, when you come to TRP, they've got this atmosphere that is clearly toxic and sexist. It demeans both men and women, it's a bad headspace to be in, there's nearly…
/r/ExRedPill03/09/17 08:41 PM
2

As most of the other commenters have said, the answer is "Yes, but with the qualification that women are hypergamous only in the way that everyone is hypergamous." Women, like all people, are looking for the person who best fits what they want. Any sensible woman is going to recognize that no man can ever possibly be 100% of what she's looking for, she'll pick some non-negotiables and get as many of the rest as she reasonably can and marry that guy (for the purposes of our thought experiment, th…
/r/ExRedPill02/08/17 01:02 AM
14

Should I employ "RP techniques" just to identify women who cannot spot the BS? I really want to avoid women who react positively to aggressive/abusive "RP techniques". Of course I don't want to cause any hurt either. Bad plan. Extremely bad plan. Most of the women who fall for TRP pick-up nonsense are...going to keep falling for it. There's a long psychology ramble that goes here, but the short version is that the type of women who are attracted to TRP men are exactly the type of women those men…
/r/ExRedPill19/07/17 09:09 PM
12

Are you familiar with the term "hybristophilia?" To quote from the Wikipedia article on the subject "Hybristophilia is a paraphilia in which sexual arousal, facilitation, and attainment of orgasm are responsive to and contingent upon being with a partner known to have committed an outrage, cheating, lying, known infidelities or crime, such as rape, murder, or armed robbery. ... In popular culture, this phenomenon is also known as 'Bonnie and Clyde Syndrome.'" This is a paraphilia. A sexual or at…
/r/ExRedPill14/07/17 01:30 AM
22

I'm going to second the original comment. Stop trying to find the magic formula that will make every woman swoon. There's no such thing. And if you want a relationship, stop looking for it in bars and clubs. For the most part, the women there are there for the same reason the men are: to hook up. If you aren't enthralled by the hot-and-heavy software engineering dating scene, I'm sure you must have other interests. Do you like rock climbing? SCUBA diving? Hiking? Canoeing? Writing? Gaming? There…
/r/ExRedPill03/07/17 01:56 AM
1

The trouble with The Red Pill as it is presented is that it has cottoned on to a couple things that are true, and then attached them to a whole bunch of lies. But because the true things are true, the lies don't get filtered. True thing the first: women are attracted to men who are attractive and/or interesting. This is true. It is absolutely, 100%, totally, completely true. If you are neither of those things, women will not be attracted to you. Why is this so? Because all human beings are attra…
/r/ExRedPill24/06/17 05:22 PM
1

Dunno, friend, a lot of it isn't really all that well-reasoned out. Granted, there is a lot of close-minded political thought right at the moment, and certainly too many people are unwilling to hear out opposing schools of thought, but all I had to do was read a little of the screed up there to realize that OP isn't actually the open-minded, free-wheeling individual they picture themself to be. So, other than, "Maybe try hearing someone out before you reject their point of view?"--which everyone…
/r/ExRedPill21/06/17 12:37 AM
1

Depends where you are. But you should start by excluding bars, clubs, or any variation thereupon. Also, for the most part, dating apps are a bad move here. If you're looking for women who don't put a lot of focus or energy into hooking up, you need to be looking places where the focus and energy doesn't go into hooking up. Honestly, that should be more than enough for you to take it from there.
/r/ExRedPill07/05/17 06:31 PM
1

There's nothing wrong with looking for particular traits in prospective partners, including being sexually cautious. That said, if you are looking for women who are not promiscuous and all the women you are finding are sexually promiscuous, you are obviously looking in the wrong places. You need to go to the places you are more likely to meet women who are sexually cautious and start getting to know the women there.
/r/ExRedPill07/05/17 05:46 PM
5

I think a lot of what you're describing is very normal for someone who is learning to balance a relationship with someone and who is finding how to relate to them in a meaningful way without trying to control them. You describe yourself as "really young" and one of the good things about being young is that you're still learning. From what I'm reading you are putting a lot of emphasis in trying to learn in a positive way, that beneficial to both of you. I'm not hearing any abusive tendencies here…
/r/ExRedPill07/05/17 05:40 PM
6

I wish this were true. Unfortunately, abusive and demeaning attitudes don't turn off for family members. I've seen more than a few TeRPers talk about mothers, sisters, and daughters. These guys DO NOT CARE about any other humans besides themselves. Not even each other, which is why they constantly promote a dog-eat-dog mentality on their forums.
/r/ExRedPill17/04/17 01:15 PM
3

"My deductions come from the conversations themselves, topics they talk about, and of course, their answer to my 'What do you like to do when you're not busy?' question which I always ask." If I can offer a random suggestion from a drive-by commenter, you're kind of undermining yourself with that question. People tend to busy themselves doing a combination of things they have to do and things they want to do. So "when you're not busy" sounds, at least to me, like a question about what people do …
/r/ExRedPill25/03/17 02:36 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter