TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Kelly-Bayems Archive

View 2 posts and 31 comments by Kelly-Bayems on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

Yes it's a soap opera, and women love watching it. If you tell me that you like to watch nerdy cartoons with an adventurous story-plot, do you think it wouldn't tell me something about your personality? This is called psycho-analysis. These fiction tales were written as a self-expression of the author to appeal to like-minded people. And these soap operas prove that women do indeed have a competitive spirit when it comes to getting the man they desire. If you don't understand this, you'd have to…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/23 12:35 PM
–

I somewhat understand your logic, but why is it that alot of soap operas usually have a plot of two or more women fighting to gain the interest of a dashing high-value man? I speak as an experienced man, women do actively compete if they find someone valuable enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/23 10:52 AM
1

Why is it that alot of soap operas usually have a plot of two or more women fighting to gain the interest of a dashing man?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/23 06:53 PM
1

All men want hot women, but evelntually settle. Much like post-wall women settle with betas. Men are not hypogamous
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/23 02:33 PM
1

What you said is correct only in the domain of cold-approach: you must use a specific "strategy" that would work on the most number of women. But you didn't properly understand this post at all, OP was talking about long term relationships which obviously come AFTER a cold-approach. He is not telling you to create a fake personality. Let's say, for example, that you're a shy nerd who plays video-games all day long, would it make sense to date a lawyer woman twice your age? The relationship will …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/23 02:29 PM
1

Buddy do you even know what straw man means?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/23 02:25 PM
1

You have to consider that most men here are obsessing for a one night stand over anything else.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/23 02:24 PM
1

You mentioned your in your late 30s, where do dating women half your age? Lol don't let the women here hear you.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/23 02:22 PM
1

You didn't monogamy say it's bad, but suggested that you view it as unnatural. Women do have higher options only when she is young, much like when men are strong and wealthy. Have a look on youtube about "women hitting the wall" and you will see countless archives of videos of women crying about struggling to find a decent man in their 30s. Men are easier to please sexually, but not so emotionally. Take this example: plenty of men complain about women being childish and illogical, yet turn their…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/23 02:19 PM
1

Before you over your game why not rephrase what you just said? It honestly doesn't convey much meaning.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/23 01:23 PM
1

Most people, even in older times, marry others in their age range. The global marriage gap is 3-5 years. Men's sexual capability drastically declines in his mid fourties, and that signals a rough time for a woman to be pregnant with his child.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/23 01:18 PM
1

My understanding of hypergamy is that a mate with lower status would not be considered at all. Is it not the case that the overwhelming majority of men would not consider marrying, or even dating for that matter, an obese drug-addicted woman in her fifties?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/23 01:16 PM
1

We have also avoided cannibalism for a short time of our history. And that is obviously a good thing. WTF has that got to do with anything? If you've followed our conversation: you claimed that ltr's are unnatural, me bringing up the banning of cannibalism shows you that something being unnatural doesn't make it bad. Because most men do not have a lot of options and in the current climate the best way to have access to sex for your average dude is to have an LTR with one. Do you suppose that the…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/23 01:14 PM
1

By your account, men evtually marry the best what they could manage to get. Is that not a practice of hypergamy, or atleast a desire for the very best mate possible?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/23 12:46 PM
1

Yes, they are something humans have only been doing for a short time of our history on this planet. We have also avoided cannibalism for a short time of our history. And that is obviously a good thing. Men is being poly while the woman is trying to move up the totem pole ie hypergamous. Then why is it that alot of men, regardless of their level of wealth, evetually stay exclusive to one woman, in a romantic manner? Wealthy men marry only one woman, they might cheat on some slutty women here and …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/23 12:45 PM
1

Would those average men be willing to marry a woman below their status and looks threshhold?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/23 12:40 PM
1

Do you think LTR's are unnatural to the human race? I'm not quite getting your point in the second paragraph.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/23 12:39 PM
1

That is indeed my point. As men seek ltr's, their level of hypergamous instinct tends to erase the gap between that of women's which existed when looking at the hypergamy gap of str between men and women.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/23 12:28 PM
1

It would be a liberal world fallacy to assume that sexual behaviors of men and women are perfectly symmetrical. The point of this post was to dismantle the common trope of TRP that men date and marry down to several by their supposed polygamous nature. But they most certainly do not do so when you take into account that rich and successful men almost always choose one exclusive woman, who is garanteed to be more beautiful and physically gifted that her male chooser.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/23 11:58 AM
1

Why don't you describe where you see this bullshit? You only whined and complained instead of making a convincing case.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/23 11:47 AM
1

Get off dating apps. They're a cash cow, not a sentimental initiative to help lonely men.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/23 11:45 AM
1

Dating apps can be more accurately named "hook-up" apps, and research has shown that men are far more interested in STR's than women. Thus there is a population skewness toward male presence on 'dating' apps. This still doesn't prove men are hypergemous. Even when women are given the chance to dictate the terms, ala Bumble, we still see the same phenomenon women going for the top ~5% of guys... The bolded text was not to prove that men are hypergamous, it's to prove that women are more hypergamo…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/23 11:44 AM
1

Yes a world falacy has been committed to some extent. It's impossible to say "just as", but the idea so commonly tossed around here is absurd: men have very low standards compared to women. That is only true in str's. In the context of LTR's: How many wealthy men are willing to marry and offer time and effort towards a woman below their status/looks preference?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/23 11:41 AM
1

I'm not disagreeing with what you said. But let's streer this conversation towards LTR's. Are men still polygamous towards long term bonds? When men marry they dedicate their resources and time for primarily one high value woman, it becomes clear that men are not polygamous in the long-bond sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/23 11:39 AM
2

That's true, one could even argue that a woman without a red flag is a red flag in itself: no real human is perfect. With that being said, there is the obvious fact that some flaws are much worse than others. A woman who has a hard time managing her finances certainly has less of a toxic trait than say a woman with emotional imbalances.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/23 10:45 PM
1

Isn't this in reverse, in terms of thinking? When you initially meet a specific person, you and the man have been in development for decades. The choices of actions after the meeting will have miniscule effect on the persona that you and the partner have accumelated before knowing each other. This is why it's a terrible mentality for someone to try to "change" their romantic partner: your months of work will not untangle a knot of a personality that has been tying for decades. This isn't an argu…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/23 07:56 PM
5

Realization that relationships and marriages are going to be difficult no matter who one is with. We do seem to living in a "red flag" culture, where people drop prospects at any sign of disagreement, unbeknown to them that what they would trade off for the current partner maybhave their own unique set of flaws.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/23 03:07 PM
5

People often take this concept to an extreme both ways: either they believe in an exact soulmate or view humans as mere commodities.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/23 03:02 PM
1

I think a large potion of the academic design that is incompatible with male's preferences stems from an inability to admit biological related differences across men and women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/06/23 02:01 PM
1

It's not really anger, as much as it is criticism. Proms women are perceived as manipulative and exploitive of sexuality. This criticism can so easily turn into out hatred, often as a form of cognitive dissonance. I firmly believe that both men and women have the right to criticise what they want of the opposite gender, however it is often the case that the former is forbidden from doing so.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/23 10:47 AM
1

Yes, in an adult manner without mixing in your emotions with communication.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/23 10:43 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter