TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Kelsig Archive

View 0 posts and 111 comments by Kelsig on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Lots of things have weak correlation
/r/MensRights13/11/15 07:09 PM
1

What colleges
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/15 04:55 AM
1

In terms of having oneself date, not studying dating
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/15 02:41 AM
1

How does something with no mention of sex or gender unfairly target us
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/15 12:33 AM
1

I never said otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/15 11:47 PM
1

then why is it only targeted at men Men are the primary opponent of it. From a legal standpoint it has always been completely asexual.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/15 10:54 PM
1

Because that's not what it is lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/15 10:40 PM
1

Dank anecdotal evidence, how about post some university or laws describing it as that, like I did. The definition of consent does not vary based upon a participant’s sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or gender expression.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/15 10:37 PM
1

AC as it is describe most of the time is is some thing done on a second to second basis with constant 'checking in'. Maybe as described by uninformed reactionaries and libertarians. You're not even reading my links and it shows.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/15 10:31 PM
1

http://thinkprogress.org/health/2014/06/25/3453041/affirmative-consent-really-means/ Your docs' negotiation consent and affirmative consent are not mutually exclusive
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/15 10:28 PM
1

Like what? Do you honestly think she is smart enough to get her info from deep within academia?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/15 10:07 PM
0

None of that has anything to do with exclusively heterosexuality but we dont discuss consent mid act . Right but you hopefully (probably) practice affirmative consent
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/15 10:07 PM
-1

oh thats why she is taught in high school and middles school class rooms. Oh wait she totally isn't. Anyway, her content is so tame. What would make it propaganda? Extremist views? Nothing in it is not found in sociology / film criticism textbooks.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/15 09:58 PM
1

what
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/15 09:57 PM
1

Cool? Since when are we talking about degrees and their usefulness
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/15 09:54 PM
2

Gender Studies has literally nothing to do with dating / confidence etc so I don't understand the comparison
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/15 09:52 PM
-3

Reading TVTropes then adding some entry-level sociological comments isn't really propaganda bro
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/15 09:51 PM
-2

She has a degree in communications
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/15 09:50 PM
1

No, it is sadly not that easy.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/15 09:44 PM
1

There wouldn't be anything wrong with that if it was done equally and in an actual culturally egalitarian society. But sadly we aren't in such a perfect vacuum.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/15 09:28 PM
1

Yes, specifically as shock value as protest against objectifying shirts lol
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/15 09:12 PM
1

Whether he wants to be one is besides the point :/
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/15 09:11 PM
2

Hey, I like the aesthetic of the shirt, and so does my gf, we just don't think its a smart idea to do as a role model for children.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/15 09:00 PM
1

Its reinforcing the societal tendency to objectify women. Hence why there are no shirts like that with men.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/15 08:54 PM
2

Well you can make your own branch of sex positive feminism lol
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/15 05:18 PM
2

It seems you misunderstand what sex positive feminists are. What you're describing is pretty much a myth. No sex positive feminists are fine with blatant objectification by teachers.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/15 04:51 PM
1

/r/Libertarianism actively advocates for hierarchy, anarchism actively advocates for the dissolution of hierarchy.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 04:05 PM
1

This is a bogus website guys. Seriously, look through their charts. It puts Sweden on the very very right. The website was made for propaganda to sway people in UK elections.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 02:35 PM
1

Its libertarian as in anarchist, not /r/libertarian
/r/MensRights09/03/15 02:28 PM
1

Are you serious.
/r/MensRights03/02/15 01:45 PM
1

Most people do not use it satirically. What about "like a bitch"?
/r/MensRights03/02/15 12:19 PM
2

....far left wing....?
/r/MensRights03/02/15 12:15 PM
3

How does that case say one can't only slightly crack the window The officer detained her for something pretty minor
/r/PussyPassDenied23/12/14 04:14 PM
1

Wow so exactly what I said Go brigade somewhere else neo-nazi MRA Edgy insults really help you out
/r/MensRights18/12/14 04:56 PM
1

? The average woman makes 77% to the average man. Not a myth. Don't call it a myth if its true. I first heard misinformation about it from Obama when he said "for the same job".
/r/MensRights18/12/14 02:28 PM
2

I'm confused
/r/MensRights14/12/14 01:00 AM
3

well you should stop doing that
/r/MensRights14/12/14 12:23 AM
3

Exactly why one shouldn't appeal to naturality. Rape and murder is a part of human nature. That doesn't mean its right.
/r/MensRights13/12/14 11:45 PM
4

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_animals_displaying_homosexual_behavior
/r/MensRights13/12/14 11:35 PM
-4

Cool
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/14 01:45 AM
-2

I don't think people have ever said rape culture has increased in magnitude
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/14 12:24 AM
1

Of course race is tied to genetics. Race is an informal way to classify people of differing genetics...but its entirely unscientific and subjective
/r/MensRights06/11/14 03:55 PM
1

You're misunderstanding the uses of race. Technically it refers to the social construct, but its informally used to indicate phenotypes. Just as gender technically refers to the social construct, but is informally used to indicate sex. http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_(human_classification). Read it. Your third paragraph is just simply wrong. Its as if you're just arguing because you're too insecure to change your stance but still want to support your superiority.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 10:45 PM
1

You specifically asked me if RACE was a social construct. Why would I answer no? What was the point of your argument? From a scientific standpoint, I am entirely correct. If you asked me if phenotypical classification is a social constrict, I would say no. I use race informally all the time. But you asked me if it was a social construct.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 09:03 PM
1

All you did was prove me right again. The article itself says its informal. http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_(human_classification) And to answer your question, Phenotype.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 06:37 PM
1

Dang you're dense. Race is not a word for biological differences differentiating different groups.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 06:20 PM
2

Because RACE is a social construct. My friend and I are both white, but we have some biological differences.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 05:39 PM
2

I have completely different hair, skin tone, eye color, skull structure, nose structure, etc than my fellow white friend. He is not a a slightly different race than me. Back in the day latinos were considered completely white, while their heritage and genetic makeup is just as different as other races. But it has changed throughout the years to be a race. How about you take some classes on both biology and psychology as you sound incredibly ignorant. Sex != Gender. This is very common knowledge.…
/r/MensRights05/11/14 03:44 PM
1

Duh
/r/MensRights05/11/14 03:29 PM
1

Duh
/r/MensRights05/11/14 03:10 PM
5

stop helping to paint the advocacy of men's rights as edgy privileged neckbeards with a persecution complex
/r/MensRights05/11/14 02:56 PM
0

stop
/r/MensRights05/11/14 02:45 PM
1

What...
/r/MensRights05/11/14 03:45 AM
-2

Its pretty funny that this sub will advocate comments that say that women don't face harassment on the streets and then advocate this post
/r/MensRights05/11/14 03:27 AM
1

Hahahahaha misunderstanding someone and refusing to care because it suits your agenda
/r/MensRights04/11/14 07:31 PM
1

The latter video, if you watch the entire thing, is more akin to a person who watches my little pony not wanting to be called a "brony".
/r/MensRights04/11/14 06:23 PM
1

Holy shit talk about misandry. Men are violent because we're born violent? What the fuck?
/r/MensRights04/11/14 06:12 PM
1

No one said that.
/r/MensRights03/11/14 10:45 PM
1

Well, she said what you said, and added on that it discourages women from feeling accepted and part of these tech communities.
/r/MensRights03/11/14 09:51 PM
2

You just restated Anita's video
/r/MensRights03/11/14 05:16 AM
2

your patriarchy lol
/r/MensRights02/11/14 08:11 PM
-17

That video was four years ago. Anyway, all she's saying is that ads like those just put women off the from sites like that. How you went from "Tech culture is heavily formed around males" into "P2P TECHNOLOGY IS SEXIST PATRIARCHY" is quite silly.
/r/MensRights02/11/14 05:44 PM
1

Every single feminism related community I've seen has commented on the racism
/r/MensRights31/10/14 03:59 PM
3

hacker named 4chan. EPIC reference!
/r/MensRights31/10/14 05:39 AM
-6

colluded to write "gaming is dead" welp you're already entirely incorrect
/r/MensRights30/10/14 11:11 PM
1

And that's leadership. Completely different than the common educated member of any groups. What about groups that lobby against pro-women legislation? Oh that's right, all radical neoconservative groups that I'm sure don't represent you or the common MRA. But then corrupt NOW members represent all feminists?
/r/MensRights27/10/14 01:15 PM
1

Holy shit man, my own real life experience with feminism proves that incorrect. While of course that's only my anecdote, so I can't expect for it to persuade you, but it mostly certainly proves it incorrect in my experience. You know how many of those men's issues which is caused by society viewing women as emotional weak, and men as emotionless and sorta the redshirts of society?
/r/MensRights27/10/14 11:51 AM
1

Why are you asking him he's just a mod not an admin lmao
/r/MensRights27/10/14 05:31 AM
1

I have read the sidebar many times.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 05:21 AM
0

I am part of lots of femism communities, both on the internet and real life. I know better than an MRA sidebar. Ya know, the one that's supposed to persuade people to become MRAs.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 03:35 AM
1

No, they really aren't. Why do you think that?
/r/MensRights26/10/14 03:47 PM
0

Patriarchal society ensures those deaths
/r/MensRights26/10/14 01:40 AM
1

The straw man was the implication is that it's an issue feminism doesn't cover
/r/MensRights25/10/14 10:20 PM
1

If it's not to do with gender roles than why is there a pay gap...
/r/MensRights25/10/14 12:44 PM
-4

Yea ya do but okay nice strawman
/r/MensRights25/10/14 04:47 AM
-3

what
/r/MensRights25/10/14 03:57 AM
-7

Its due to gender roles.
/r/MensRights25/10/14 03:54 AM
-6

Well just because discrimination isn't active doesn't mean it doesn't exist
/r/MensRights25/10/14 03:45 AM
-6

The pay gap shows how gender roles affect professions. Women are more likely to go into lower paying fields, and are less likely to get promoted (usually because they don't feel that much drive to)
/r/MensRights25/10/14 02:19 AM
-2

They pay gap isn't a myth, but its misunderstood
/r/MensRights25/10/14 12:30 AM
1

I guess its both looking back
/r/MensRights24/10/14 06:16 AM
1

Right that's about what I see when it comes to demographics. Smart phone games have a ton of women. MMOs have a good amount, and hardcore games tend to have a small amount
/r/MensRights24/10/14 05:38 AM
1

But we've been mainly talking about gender from the start...
/r/MensRights24/10/14 02:32 AM
1

Whenever studies are posted showing that gamers in general are 50+ percent women, MRAs try to disprove them with studies not including portables.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 02:25 AM
1

Every image I find seems to be about the same, this http://ufgtus.files.wordpress.com/2014/02/ufgt9funtimes.png?w=2560&h=1160
/r/MensRights24/10/14 01:35 AM
0

But one is inherently open to luck and is anecdotal by nature...
/r/MensRights24/10/14 01:01 AM
2

A typical feminist would not say that. A typical feminist would say, that according to patriarchal theory, the worlds assumption is that women are feeble and would never do such a thing. This is a women's issue as well as a men's issue.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 12:43 AM
2

Technically she had more counts
/r/MensRights24/10/14 12:42 AM
1

but
/r/MensRights24/10/14 12:29 AM
1

That's a fighting tournament. Its rooted in the east. Nevertheless, straight men :)
/r/MensRights24/10/14 12:16 AM
1

While I wish that were the case I just don't see how that could possibly be right. Gaming in general sure, once you account for "casual" gamers.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 12:09 AM
1

I don't follow. Are you arguing that hardcore gaming communities are not primarily cis white males?
/r/MensRights23/10/14 11:34 PM
1

ok
/r/MensRights23/10/14 11:32 PM
2

Because its gaming based. Of course it follow gaming culture's demographics.
/r/MensRights23/10/14 11:02 PM
1

It doesn't accept genetic male variability in ALL fields. I mentioned her because she proved it was not even close to completely natural, and a big portion was not genetic. Edit: typo
/r/MensRights23/10/14 10:50 PM
2

Quality. Look at all time acclaimed novels of the last 30 or so years. It's all cultural. EDIT: There's plenty of science behind it; Google is your friend. see Leta Hollingworth's studies on male variation.
/r/MensRights23/10/14 10:27 PM
2

So your argument is "It's just the way things work." I don't need unscientific Red Pill rhetoric. Why exactly do women dominate fiction literature?
/r/MensRights23/10/14 10:21 PM
2

You're looking WAY too far into it. While that's true (unknown if nature or nurture tho) for IQs and mathematical skill and such, the reason for there not being that many top of the top women in vidya games is simply the lack of super hardcore women in vidya. So let me reiterate, the same reason you don't see poor african men on teams.
/r/MensRights23/10/14 09:56 PM
2

Yea because there's way less dedicated women playing. The same reason you don't see poor african men on teams.
/r/MensRights23/10/14 09:06 PM
1

Whoa witch house. Haven't seen that term in ages.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/14 02:13 AM
3

But it does
/r/MensRights06/10/14 01:11 AM
0

Most men are reduced to a permanent state of anxiety during marriage?
/r/MensRights30/09/14 02:14 AM
1

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internalized_racism
/r/MensRights11/09/14 02:02 AM
0

I be myself in a confident manner. It should be noted idgaf about casual sex and really only care about sex when it comes to doing it with a woman I care about,
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/14 07:38 PM
1

Hahaha dude this is the most genius satire I've seen in a while
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/14 03:20 PM
2

Well, half /r/circlebroke
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/14 05:12 PM
3

Just a satirical circlejerk like /r/circlejerk
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/14 04:59 PM
1

She did not in anyway suggest that, if you bothered, you know, reading..
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/14 08:48 AM
4

who mentioned torture? lol wat
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/14 08:27 AM
2

you're very angry
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/14 08:17 AM
2

Just told my crush to do the monkey with me. I think it worked.
/r/seduction21/10/12 02:27 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter