TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Kennuf22 Archive

View 0 posts and 63 comments by Kennuf22 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-9

Lol dont be so fragile.
/r/MensRights04/07/20 06:30 PM
-21

Why tf would you film this and put it on the internet?
/r/MensRights04/07/20 03:07 PM
1

Breh, most special interest subs are complete trash. Those women are the perpetually single cast-offs whose views in no way reflect the views of a vast majority of folks. Same applies here as well
/r/MensRights17/01/20 06:03 PM
-11

Is it a stretch to assume there are urinals in that bathroom? Which may make this sign necessary?
/r/MensRights06/11/19 06:03 PM
1

Upvote if you're shocked this guy can't elaborate on his comment.
/r/MensRights01/11/19 04:07 PM
1

Yes it does. To say otherwise is to deny decades of peer reviewed scientific research. Given your abject ignorance and willingness to challenge your own beliefs, I'm not sure your common sense is a valid benchmark.
/r/MensRights01/11/19 03:33 PM
-1

Oh, nobody is going to upvote me? No way. I've had such luck on here today. And I'm the only one on r/MensRights who doesn't get it. This should be a red flag for you, but it's not. I'd love for you to explain it to me. You have a nack for coherently and thoughtfully presenting complex ideas. Whatever you do, dont address the glaring hypocrisy and inconsistencies in your social theory that was just laid out for you.
/r/MensRights31/10/19 11:13 PM
-4

Upvote if you're shocked this guy couldn't justify any of his bigotry and hypocrisy and resorted to ad hominem to distract from the fact he has put himself in an indefensible position.
/r/MensRights31/10/19 10:54 PM
-4

Do you honestly not get the point I'm making? Seriously? I mean I get you need to misconstrue things to make this whole MRA thing work- as do all identity movements- but come on. I even elaborated and clarified right underneath that.
/r/MensRights31/10/19 10:44 PM
1

No doubt
/r/MensRights31/10/19 09:53 PM
1

No, you certainly could care less. A lot less. I'm actually convinced people you perceive to be white knights eat away at your core. That's why you, a family man with a job and certainly your own more important issues, have taken the time out of your day to confront me and continue to have a discussion over the course of 2 hours. The other day my niece was trying to convince me that the people on tv were actually inside the TV acting out everything live right in front of us. After a bit of back …
/r/MensRights31/10/19 09:40 PM
-3

I just had an MRA tell me, "if you were a real man...". Below, please use your best mental gymnastics to justify this abject hypocrisy. How do you know she wasn't being dragged out of the store? The only info available is this tweet (which clearly states the guy was undercover and not in uniform, so solid detective work there). How the hell can you not retain info from a tweet that is like half a scroll above you to reference whenever you'd like? Honestly, how did you manage this? Willfull ignor…
/r/MensRights31/10/19 09:23 PM
1

"You make no sense" "We understand..." Should I go ahead and chalk up another internet victory for myself, here? You've started avoiding the discussion at hand leading me to believe you don't actually have an argument. Or, you could shock the world and construct a coherent argument. Up to you, I'll be winning either way.
/r/MensRights31/10/19 08:42 PM
-11

"If you think DNA compells..." Molecular Genetics is a thing. Did you decide to not even do a rudimentary Google search before you posted? Really? "If a woman screamed rape..." https://www.google.com/search?q=sexual+assaults+in+gracery+stores&oq=sexual+assaults+in+gracery+stores+&aqs=chrome..69i57.12703j1j9&client=ms-android-tmus-us-revc&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8 "If I were a guard..." As I should. You'd be doing your job and I'd be the one overreacting. I've never said the guy who hit the…
/r/MensRights31/10/19 08:26 PM
0

This matters to you and you cant see the hypocrisy in it.
/r/MensRights31/10/19 08:14 PM
0

By all means please avoid trying to understand what I'm saying.
/r/MensRights31/10/19 08:03 PM
-2

Please c/p where I said or even insinuated those were the only options and I'll gladly set the record straight.
/r/MensRights31/10/19 07:53 PM
-7

No. I've clearly laid out my position- if you'd care to take the time to read and understand a conversation you somehow have the confidence to chime in on.
/r/MensRights31/10/19 07:34 PM
-6

I'm sympathizing with a guy who got caught up in a stressful situation and appears to have reacted poorly. If that is triggering for you, I apologize.
/r/MensRights31/10/19 07:20 PM
-1

This is a dope argument. I appreciate you stopping by.
/r/MensRights31/10/19 07:01 PM
-11

I hate discussions too. I'd rather just c/p some wildly self-unaware quote some other dude said and call it a day.
/r/MensRights31/10/19 06:50 PM
-5

Y'all are missing my point entirely. Granted I could have been more clear, so I'll do that now. I'm not defending him punching a cop. I'm just saying somebody percevabky in distress warrants a reaction. And I can sympathize with how one could get carried away in their reaction. Yalls inability to recognize human imperfection and biology is utterly deafening.
/r/MensRights31/10/19 06:36 PM
-1

Yea, that sounds great. Unfortunately, testosterone, adrenaline, and a couple billion years of evolution dont really support your idealized view of masculinity. The dude heard a woman in distress, got all juiced up on adrenaline (not because he's an idiot, because he's a human and he heard another human in distress.), and made some seemingly poor decisions. Did you just conflate traditional conservatism with feminism? Nice. Btw, wtf is up with the 10min between comments rule? God forbid people w…
/r/MensRights31/10/19 05:31 PM
-66

I dont think I'm a idiot and I don't think the guy who overreacted is an idiot. You realize that his reaction is in our DNA, right? It's the same reason some folks dont want women in combat: men go out of their way, often times irrationally, to help women who are perceived to be in trouble. I'm not asking you to like it, I'd just like you to acknowledge that testosterone and adrenaline can severely affect behavior- and I cant think of a more adrenaline inducing grocery store situation than a chi…
/r/MensRights31/10/19 05:13 PM
-52

"Go for the eyes, sweetie. Cops say they'll be here in 15. You got this, girl!!"
/r/MensRights31/10/19 04:44 PM
-5

Lol, chill. I conceded the guy probably overreacted. But the situation justly, yes justly- warranted a reaction. I thought this movement was about empowering masculinity? What's more masculine than running towards a damsel in distress?
/r/MensRights31/10/19 04:34 PM
-9

Which is your prerogative. But to act as if there aren't people out there who aren't justly concerned when a woman yells "rape" in a supermarket is preposterous.
/r/MensRights31/10/19 04:13 PM
-128

This guy probably overreacted, but I can sympathize with him. I could see myself in that situation. If a girl is screaming "rape", what are people around her supposed to think and do? "Oh sorry, honey. Going to need to wait for due process before we intervene here. Good luck."
/r/MensRights31/10/19 04:00 PM
5

How do you fail a killing a 4yo, twice?
/r/PussyPassDenied18/06/19 05:25 PM
5

Open handed so it's not illegal
/r/PussyPassDenied27/01/19 03:35 AM
4

Then stop buying those games. These devs do it to sell more games, it's called capitalism.
/r/MensRights13/07/18 05:28 PM
1

You certainly fucking have waisted your time. Your last 4 comments only happened because A) you forgot what the original point was B) you didn't read the report, you didn't even skim through. By God y'all are identical to feminists. Just irrational, ignorant ramblings about how your identity group is more oppressed. The goddam oppression Olympics, I tell you!!!
/r/MensRights13/10/17 12:11 PM
1

Huh? This comment was in no way relevant to anything we've been talking about. You've blatantly ignored hard data that men abuse children more than women.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 11:42 AM
1

Yes...
/r/MensRights13/10/17 01:56 AM
1

No their not. Did you not read the report I just cited?
/r/MensRights13/10/17 01:32 AM
1

So your point is that men rape children WAY more than women?
/r/MensRights13/10/17 12:48 AM
1

Scroll down sugar
/r/MensRights12/10/17 09:24 PM
0

You know what white trash is?
/r/MensRights12/10/17 07:27 PM
0

You will not get a voice here
/r/MensRights12/10/17 05:29 PM
0

"Studies have consistently shown that in the case of female victims of abuse, over 90% of the perpe- trators are men, and in the case of male victims, between 63% and 86% of the perpetrators are men" https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/violence/global_campaign/en/chap3.pdf&ved=0ahUKEwiJ0LGZxuvWAhWKqFQKHWPPDB8QFggdMAA&usg=AOvVaw1LMcthvzQ2uRqV9rqr4rnw Got the number wrong, but you get it. Edit: if you need a citation for the first part…
/r/MensRights12/10/17 05:03 PM
-12

Well men tend to abandon their children, so women have far more contact with children than men. This skews these stats. In fact, 78% of child abuse occurring in two parent households is committed by the father. Have you any concern about that?
/r/MensRights12/10/17 04:50 PM
0

Your gf is unattractive.
/r/MensRights12/10/17 04:29 PM
1

This is absolutely exhausting. This entire comment is a result of your refusal to read a source because it doesn't say "mother" enough.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 08:44 PM
1

How is that a non-argument? And how have I not provided evidence? Scroll up, hoss. I know a lot about your parental circumstances, because you told me. Shit man, is this whole comment independent of everything we've discussed?. This is really starting to be redundant. Dafuq is this paragraph about? Seriously. And if one instance is statistically irrelevant, why did you tell me about your dead-beat dad in the first place? He's irrelevant to you, to me, and statistically. Who cares? Is this quote …
/r/MensRights19/07/17 06:46 PM
1

Objectively, women are biologically better at raising children. Biology has suited our societies gender roles for us. Biology. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biology
/r/MensRights19/07/17 06:20 PM
-1

If you can't read between the lines here I'm not sure continuing a conversation is going to be worth while.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 06:08 PM
1

Really? Because, "societies greatest asset is men. The entire world was built and is maintained by men." Lol
/r/MensRights19/07/17 05:58 PM
1

Top fucking kek to the child who thinks any use of the word "progressive" is a direct allusion to liberalism. Top fucking kek to the kid who slanders "faggots and tranny[s]" then has the nerve to call someone else a piece of shit. Top fucking kek to the kid who exudes every detestable characteristic of the radical feminists the sub he is commenting on was created to combat. Top fucking kek to all of this flying way over your head. Top fucking kek indeed, my good sir. Top fucking kek.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 05:47 PM
1

Well I'll just skip the part where you think you don't need to read the links you asked for. What you're getting at in the second paragraph is pretty much true. Although, you're mistaking the importance of a two-parent family to mean the father is more critical. It's not. The absence of either parent would produce similar situations to the one you cited. This applies to your 3rd paragraph as well. Families don't fall apart because the kids are raised by their mothers, families fall apart because…
/r/MensRights19/07/17 05:37 PM
2

...Raised by great mothers.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 05:18 PM
0

No, it's having a two-parent household.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 03:30 PM
-1

Dear God this is ignorant. Sure, a man feeds and shelters his children. However, without proper and progressive parental interactions, typically carried out in large part by the mother, the children will be well fed, sheltered shitbags that will become very good at nothing more than producing "jail bound spawn".
/r/MensRights19/07/17 03:19 PM
-1

For my entertainment, would you mind explaining what you're talking about?
/r/MensRights19/07/17 03:09 PM
0

Umm, you didn't read it. Hence This^ entire comment. You also didn't read my second source, which would explain parts of the first citation. "... that's the opposite of what I said." Are you literally saying that all women do is clean pots and pans? And that men are the breadwinners AND primary care-givers? If you are I will gladly bow out of this discussion. Your analogy is completely off base. "I didn't have a father... How good of a father do you think ibwpuld make?" Depends on how well your …
/r/MensRights19/07/17 02:58 PM
-3

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biology
/r/MensRights19/07/17 02:34 PM
-1

I would love to see your well constructed argument for this.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 02:23 PM
-1

Citation: https://aspe.hhs.gov/basic-report/identifying-successful-families-overview-constructs-and-selected-measures Citation #2: en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biology What type of men typically don't "bring home the bacon" on any level? Well, fathers who either aren't around or not able to earn a living. In both of these cases (removing the obvious health conditions etc.) One can trace these issues back to a poor upbringing, an upbringing (meaning day-to-day parental interactions) that we both agree…
/r/MensRights19/07/17 02:12 PM
-2

I agree, but generally a shitty father is manifested as an uninvolved father leaving the mother to raise children on her own. Making her role more valuable. Even in a cohesive family unit she is generally tasked with the bulk raising children. I completely agree that both sides of the equation are essential, all I'm saying is that in terms of day-to-day child interactions, mothers are more essential.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 01:45 PM
-31

Fair. But, who is generally tasked with raising these men?
/r/MensRights19/07/17 01:35 PM
-12

Fair points, but biologically, women are better and more essential to raising children. Your argument is essentially "well, families are better off with two parents and a supporting cast of family members". Um, duh. In the traditional (most effective) family units the men earn a living and the women take care of domestic duties, including the bulk of raising children. So, why would mothers not be more of an asset when looked at individually?
/r/MensRights19/07/17 01:25 PM
-83

Well, first things first. If you're being yelled at by 7 different bosses, you need to be better at your job. Just sayin. I'm not sure you're in a position to speak on how rewarding being a mother is. Furthermore, why is providing for a family and being a great father not equally as rewarding? Most women do see it as a blessing, not this prof, obviously- tbh, she is likely in no better position to speak about being a mother than you or I. Yes, the great-mom-and-father combo is ideal. I just wish…
/r/MensRights19/07/17 01:10 PM
-67

No need to trivialize it. A society's greatest asset are great mothers. Edit: After much discussion, I would like to announce a winner. The final point tallies are as follows: U/kennuf22: 17 Insecure men: 0 Thank you all for your time.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 12:45 PM
3

My head exploded
/r/PussyPassDenied15/05/17 05:15 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter