TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Kensin Archive

View 0 posts and 121 comments by Kensin on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Sure, but it is also the GM's job to assist his/her managers when they're in a crappy situation. Agree there. The GM should have just handled it when requested especially if the manager work should not have been stopped (which is a good idea if they were counting/storing money). It's so crazy that a manage and a GM were in the building and this still happened. Actually, and this may not be true everywhere you go, at my employer the policy is to entirely disengage with the guest until security or…
/r/PussyPassDenied18/03/21 02:13 AM
2

According the manager, the bitchy lady wanted a refund and that required a manager to do it. She was in the back "verifying money" (whatever that means) and so she asked the general manager to handle it but the GM told her to deal with the customer. She didn't feel like it though because She was like, 'Nashawnda, stop doing what you're doing, just go up there and give her the refund.' So I'm like, 'Karen, as soon as I get up there, it's going to blow up, you hear how she's up there just going of…
/r/PussyPassDenied18/03/21 01:43 AM
6

literally nothing. It's not even free money. We pay taxes specifically so that our government can provide disaster relief. This is just government doing their job, doing exactly what we elected them to do. Maybe some people can be suckered into thinking "it is not the government’s job to support the public during trying times like this." but then what would we need them for?
/r/PussyPassDenied17/03/21 03:17 AM
7

Yeah, there's no excuse for that wait time. Even if they had customers backed up to the door (and clearly they did not). They should have just taken the 5 minutes needed to refund her money and get her out of their lives. She was wrong to turn a complaint about shitty fast food into a physical assault, but nobody involved handled this situation reasonably.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/03/21 12:53 AM
1

non-daily mail link
/r/PussyPassDenied17/03/21 12:45 AM
3

I believe we still don't know enough about the roots of gender dysphoria to stand up and announce that transition is a cure-all solution for everyone. We already have enough evidence to know that it isn't. There are and will always be people for whom transitioning isn't an option or isn't effective. Rejecting every effort to research alternative therapies and treatments is just going to cause more harm for them. Science and medicine should strive to be safeguarded from politics and activists. It…
/r/MensRights10/12/20 12:12 AM
10

Women are uniquely disadvantaged in a number of ways and for as much as people seem to jump at the chance to compete in the Oppression Olympics I doubt anyone has ever really made a serious effort at counting them all and putting them up against the issues that uniquely disadvantage men to see who'd really "win". The reality is that it doesn't even matter, we should really just be focused on identifying and solving the problems and inequalities faced by either sex when they present themselves. F…
/r/MensRights27/05/20 01:39 AM
9

I'm not usually a fan of people's actions off the clock being used as justification for firing them, but racism, animal abuse, and illegally calling in a false report to the police is not a good look for any company. I've seen a lot of people correctly pointing out that she knew the police would believe her over the word of a black man and that he could have been hurt or killed if they'd managed show up quickly which was why she gleefully threatened it before going into a crying/hysterics act wi…
/r/MensRights27/05/20 01:14 AM
23

It disturbs me that people fetishize circumcision. I'm not entirely surprised... seems like whatever you can imagine there's a group of people on the internet who are getting off to it, and I try not to kink shame too much, but this particular fetish seems actually harmful to others.
/r/MensRights30/04/20 09:52 AM
8

Personally, I don't. not as long as it's done as an adult and it's not coerced. People can do whatever they want with their own bodies when they're the only ones who will have to live with the consequences. I wouldn't choose that, but you do you.
/r/MensRights30/04/20 09:40 AM
3

I agree on the "contribute" part, but people tend to upvote whatever they agree with/enjoy with little if any regard to if it really belongs where it was posted. The moderators should be taking care that this place doesn't turn into "Bitching About Women: The Subreddit" because without them the users will turn the focus of this subreddit away from the depressing problems men face onto things that just make us feel better like taking jabs at hypocritical idiots on social media.
/r/MensRights28/04/20 10:35 AM
1

The argument seems to be that raising the minimum wage means that companies wouldn't be able to afford as many workers so some people would be out of a job. That however assumes that companies have more staff now than they need when in reality companies already do everything in their power to minimize labor expenses.
/r/MensRights24/04/20 11:33 PM
1

I never advocated for doing only the "same thing for a hundred years". I think things need to and can change and that means we have to adapt as well. When women were treated like property and couldn't even vote to change anything I'm sure many of them thought like you do "Men run society and will never acknowledge discrimination against women!" but others fought to change that and while it took a long time they did so successfully. We're far better off than they were. Who do you think passes the…
/r/MensRights13/04/20 08:08 PM
8

One good thing to come out of the trump presidency is that it showed it's possible for a person to be elected as president even when party insiders don't want the candidate.
/r/MensRights08/04/20 04:02 AM
2

It's just a symptom of the larger perception that men don't matter. I wouldn't expect films to be censored to remove that sort of thing, but it does reflect a very ingrained bias that we should be addressing. I suspect it'll never go away entirely, but once we fix the underlying issue it won't be so prevalent in media.
/r/MensRights08/04/20 02:18 AM
3

Yeah, it's pretty much useless to rail against "current society" and say it can't be reasoned with as we're very much a part of that and collectively are perfectly capable of changing it. It took women a long time to get their issues to the public's attention but they did it. We can do the same. The moment you start saying that the majority of people are beyond reason and can never change you might as well give up entirely. I've seen the public perception shift dramatically in just my own lifeti…
/r/MensRights08/04/20 02:11 AM
2

His website. Looks like he's got streaming + DRM free downloads which is awesome.
/r/MensRights07/04/20 05:21 AM
1

I'd say he was promoting that subreddit, but this seems like a sympathetic enough audience that the deception just seems unnecessary. Like: "here's a subreddit you might like" would work just as well.
/r/MensRights07/04/20 05:10 AM
1

That's true. I'm glad it's not the popular movement it used to be, but they somehow still manage to hold onto the false image they market to women. I think the older generations especially are full of egalitarians who've spent too long defining themselves with the label of feminist to feel the need to reevaluate what that actually means. Some of them could be brought around.
/r/MensRights07/04/20 05:00 AM
3

Ok but it's no tragedy when it happens to women. What's good for the goose is good for the gander. It's a tragedy when it happens to anyone. They might have originally planted the minefield, but it's not helping us or anyone else to cheer when one of them occasionally falls on a mine. Yes, there's a degree of irony when someone shoots themself in the foot, but we can point and laugh at them while we all bleed out together or we can reach out and help them understand why the situation they create…
/r/MensRights07/04/20 04:43 AM
2

I honestly think many would, at least those who are more egalitarian in their beliefs. A lot of people who identify as feminists care more about what feminism falsely claims to be than what it actually is. I think it's a loud and politically active minority that would actually prefer to see men suffer while the masses (who aren't especially interested in politics) just think "of course I support women and want equality so that means I'm a feminist!"
/r/MensRights07/04/20 04:26 AM
3

Well, this particular high minded ideal is one of mine and I'm subscribed here so it's not entirely absent when the issue impacts men either. I'd bet most that people here share that ideal no matter who is being screwed over by the legal system. Hell, I'd guess most people in general would want the system improved for everyone vs simply unfairly destroying the lives of everyone equally. Assuming they were aware of the issue at all anyway. A lot of people don't understand how abusive the family c…
/r/MensRights07/04/20 04:17 AM
18

If 10 million more women get jacked, have their children confiscated and thrown in jail, it would only make things fair. No, that might make it equal but it certainly wouldn't make it fair. You can't make an injustice fair by equally distributing it among more people. Men have been fucked over for a long time in divorces, but none of us should be hoping for women to be fucked over just as badly. That isn't fair, it's just vengeance and that's not productive. I'd much rather fix the system so tha…
/r/MensRights07/04/20 02:09 AM
2

Just cap it at a certain percentage for everyone rich or poor so that people can be cared for without screwing the other too badly.
/r/MensRights07/04/20 02:06 AM
7

I'm hesitant to go after the kid that hard. Depending on the age of the kid. She's in middle school so she might only be in the 6th grade, This sounds more like child abuse than a case of equal partners to a crime.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/03/20 08:03 PM
1

Non AMP links: https://newsone.com/3899965/blood-over-students-cops-assault-teen-viral-video/amp/ https://edition.cnn.com/2017/07/14/us/teen-police-assault-claim-california-trnd/index.html https://www.vox.com/platform/amp/identities/2019/10/24/20929397/police-officer-excessive-force-school-11-year-old-girl-new-mexico
/r/MensRights19/02/20 08:19 PM
2

female dating strategy and MGTOW are revealing, but they don't really give you a lot of good information on the actual issues impacting the lives of men or women though. Both men and women do face unique challenges and important issues that still need to be addressed.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/02/20 04:52 AM
2

There's /r/Egalitarianism/ but I'd really recommend subscribing to (or at least checking out) /r/Feminism/ and /r/MensRights/ Both subreddits have their problems, but you can get an idea of where inequalities are and it's good to understand their perspectives even in cases where they're being unreasonable. Fair warning: Posting in /r/Feminism with anything that resembles a dissenting opinion is likely to get you banned. /r/MensRights/ is much more open to debate and discussion but they'll probab…
/r/PussyPassDenied14/02/20 02:51 AM
1

I spent years considering myself a feminist only to lean that I'd been lied to about what they were and what that meant. Now I'm firmly in the egalitarian camp. I'll still advocate for specific women's issues (or men's for that matter), but I can do that without them.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/02/20 11:34 PM
3

Feminism at its core is pretty cool, equality for all.. That's called Egalitarianism. Feminism says they want equality for everyone out one side of their mouths while pushing for shit like Duluth Model and working against Egalitarian polices like shared parenting laws or domestic violence shelters for men. They use their false definition of "equality for everyone" to attack anyone who opposes them (because what kind of asshole doesn't support equality for everyone!) while actively working agains…
/r/PussyPassDenied13/02/20 09:58 PM
1

It's weird that his instinct was to go after the man who by then already had his back turned to the woman and not rush to the girl to make sure she was okay/not going to further escalate the situation
/r/PussyPassDenied22/01/20 08:48 PM
1

The teacher is being charged with criminal solicitation of a minor, obscenity/disseminating harmful material or exhibiting harmful performance to minors, and sexual battery with a student 16 or 17 years of age with no aggravated force or coercion. If the student wasn't a minor at the time, how will those charges hold up?
/r/PussyPassDenied14/01/20 08:07 PM
4

I don't want Netflix filtering what kinds of shows are available on their platform because of political views at all. If I want an echo chamber where I only hear things I agree with I can just not watch shows that challenge me. I have no problems not watching Bill Nye's new shitty show, but I respect the rights of other people to watch it and decide for themselves what's right and wrong.
/r/MensRights07/10/19 08:53 PM
22

False accusers don't usually get punished because then it "supposedly" makes future "victims" hesitant to come forward when a real crime happens I've heard that used but the most popular take I see these days on why false accusers shouldn't have to deal with any consequences for their lies is that if you punish one liar today the next liar will be less likely to admit that they've lied at all. Of course, not holding false accusers accountable for the very real harm they do to the lives of others…
/r/MensRights04/10/19 08:19 AM
5

I'd take this with a very very large grain of salt given the source. The FDA does show a number of reported deaths in people who were taking Leuprolide Acetate, but does not state why they were taking it (how many of those deaths were children taking it as a puberty blocker). The article goes on to say that "The American College of Pediatricians has compiled significant research on the effects of puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones on children." and I haven't had a chance yet to dig into the…
/r/MensRights04/10/19 05:59 AM
1

I mean, what help would I need? assuming you're sincere you seem to have a lot of anger and resentment towards women. You generalize them and their motivations readily. You've been wildly misinformed about them (no, women don't sync their periods, no they aren't inclined to murder their children via some stress induced animal instinct). You have spent literal years denying and downplaying rape (even suggesting that rape is no worse than any other type of assault or that "imaginary rape leaves al…
/r/MensRights18/06/19 08:14 AM
1

click my history, i been here for years. I did. the account has been around for years, you don't post or comment all the time, but when you do it's almost entirely here. No other interests or hobbies? You have an account almost entirely dedicated to posting in a single subreddit. Either you're sincere and you really do need to get help, or you aren't and... well actually that'd still not be healthy behavior. In either case I'm telling you, as a total stranger, there are people who can help you. …
/r/MensRights18/06/19 05:03 AM
1

I really wonder weather you believe that you have something that amounts to evidence of rape, I don't need it. I didn't make the claim that not one single story of sexual assault or rape that made it to national news was true. You made the ridiculous claim and so the burden or proof is on you. That said, I did provide an example of someone accused that made national news and in that case the courts ruled on the evidence. no. i do not come here to make you look bad. Really? Because you sound very…
/r/MensRights18/06/19 04:17 AM
2

let me guess, you remember your dad, he always seemed nice to you, but after he left your mom told you how awful and abusive he was, he cheated on her, he hit her, she dindu nuffin, the woman was a saint, dad man bad. am I close? Not remotely, but of course, that's irrelevant because, you have zero evidence supporting your claims. Strongly held opinions aren't facts and just because something feels true to you, that doesn't make it real. I don't know if you just come here to make the rest of us …
/r/MensRights18/06/19 03:57 AM
1

What’s scaring me is I don’t believe this guy is a troll. He(?) isn't a normal redditor either. In the last two years nearly every comment he's made was here in this subreddit. Does this guy have no other interests at all? The account goes back 6 years and yet again, submissions are 99% one subreddit. If this account wasn't created to make this place look bad it's certainly got some kind of very specific mission.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 02:45 AM
1

why does EVERY SINGLE rape of sexual assault allegation that comes to national attention and is investigated turn out to be false? That's a lie. Larry Nassar is only one of many examples, but one is all that's needed when you make indefensible statements like "EVERY SINGLE" rape or sexual assault allegation that make national news was a false accusation. Give is up. You have no evidence to support your claims and mocking people for pointing that out isn't doing you any favors. I get that you're …
/r/MensRights18/06/19 02:19 AM
0

The is a mature woman, old enough to understand how crazy she herself is. That seems presumptive. Many people with mental illness don't understand the scope or extent of their problem if they even recognize it at all. Hoarders in particular can be shocked after being told they have a problem even while their homes are filled with trash. Super obvious to everyone else but some just can't see it until their unhealthy behaviors and reactions are explicitly pointed out to them and even then there is…
/r/MensRights12/06/19 01:41 AM
2

He's 100% correct that diversity brings more ideas and viewpoints to creative efforts. That aspect probably is less important when it comes to who does the acting, but one of the major reasons people want more diversity is "representation". For a long time the US had some major problems where certain types of people were almost never seen in media or were only seen in very specific roles or contexts which were sometimes inaccurate or demeaning. A lot of people really do value being able to see a…
/r/MensRights08/05/19 08:00 PM
1

You can complain until the cows come home, the post will stay up. That's true although mods my decide to remove it if their attention is called to it, and I believe that speaking out is useful despite the fact complaints can't remove posts. It illustrates that not everyone here agrees with unrelated content. It makes that clear to the poster and invites him to reassess the appropriateness of what he posted. I might also help remind commenters where they are as I'm guessing there are a fair bit o…
/r/MensRights10/04/19 11:52 AM
1

For example, look at the number of words devoted to each subject by you in this thread. It's basically all about feminism; which isn't the main topic of this sub at all. That's true, but it is the main topic of this thread and my objection to it. My concern isn't defense of feminism it's defense of this subreddit as a place for constructive discussion and promotion of the challenges men face. It's easy to get mad about/poke fun at posts from crazy people on social media. It's popular content. Lo…
/r/MensRights10/04/19 03:35 AM
1

I 100% support calling out feminists when they are doing harm to men. This post wasn't that however. Nothing about this post has anything to do with men and isn't even a mainstream feminist perspective. It's just making fun of one crazy person on the internet. That's not even a bad thing but there are several more appropriate subreddits for that. I do fully agree we should be calling attention to harm caused by feminists and I also think we should be supporting of feminism when it actually does …
/r/MensRights10/04/19 02:15 AM
1

claiming to take the high ground by doing the same thing as what you are calling out (lack of productivity) is another. I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree. I believe that complaining about posts that aren't relevant is productive. Not "for the sake of it" but so that this place doesn't become filled with shit posts and general attacks on every crazy thing women post online. If I'd found this in insanepeoplefacebook or TumblrInAction I'd have gladly upvoted it, but it doesn't really bel…
/r/MensRights10/04/19 02:07 AM
1

I suspect the reasoning that lies behind it is feminism=women I don't believe that, and I think there are a number of legitimate criticisms we can make against feminism and how they've demonized men and the movement. Doctors "fat shaming" women with a diabetes diagnosis however is neither a mainstream view of feminists or an area of feminism that is harmful to our rights. I also try to avoid thinking of feminism as "the opposition". For all the harm they've done (and continue to do) the vast maj…
/r/MensRights10/04/19 02:01 AM
0

I think there is value in calling out posts that distract from the point of this subreddit. It seems we need to decide if this is a subreddit about men's rights or just a general anti-feminism subreddit that sometimes talks about issues men have.
/r/MensRights09/04/19 10:42 PM
0

what does this have to do with men's rights? There are plenty of subreddits dedicated to making fun of stupid shit feminists say. Why can't this subreddit focus on something more productive? Jokes aren't even the problem, this is just so off topic I feel like it's only here because it's preaching to the choir.
/r/MensRights09/04/19 10:12 PM
4

So long as they survive
/r/PussyPass09/03/19 10:01 PM
27

the defendant is now in a new relationship and is pregnant. She tried to murder someone just because earlier they had an argument and "She was in a highly emotional state" and now she gets away with it with no consequences. Not a good sign for that baby or her new boyfriend.
/r/PussyPass09/03/19 09:43 PM
2

That's true, there is value in a brand that they've been building and marketing for over many years. They might not lose much money in sales but they could lose that advantage at least and it'll be costly if they decide to establish a new brand to release those products under. They've certainly damaged their brand already.
/r/MensRights02/03/19 03:22 AM
8

I'm not convinced modern boycotts are at all effective. Gillette is just one of a very diverse set of products owned by P&G and their board members are also CEOs of further companies with diverse products and services to the point where even you spend the effort to try to assemble a massive list of products to avoid at some point your money will eventually funnel to the same people regardless.
/r/MensRights01/03/19 10:02 PM
2

Exactly. He should keep an eye out for signs of abusive behavior that aren't physical as well. Anyone can lose their cool and forget themselves momentarily, but if this is the start of a trend or an escalation of behavior he's already been ignoring/dismissing it's time to start on an exit plan.
/r/MensRights21/12/18 08:11 PM
2

Thanks for calling this shit out. I wish the mods did a better job of doing it, but it always makes me happy to see this subreddit policing itself.
/r/MensRights05/12/18 10:28 PM
26

It's not just the MGTOW crowd. A lot of people here came out of horrific marriages where their exes abused them, took advantage of them, and/or prevented them from seeing their own kids. With very little support for men in those situations and a very biased family court system plenty of men here see marriage as a broken and dangerous system. Some men only start looking into men's rights after being personally screwed over at which point they can come here still very angry and bitter and it comes…
/r/MensRights06/11/18 07:11 AM
61

I'm guessing it was the admins trying to cater to women but never considering the impact it would have on the subreddit and not caring about how the women who subscribed there felt as they certainly didn't want it to be made a default either.
/r/MensRights06/11/18 06:55 AM
1

It works for me but the article cites this: https://www.yahoo.com/news/9-year-old-faces-sexual-harassment-charges-for-161522019.html
/r/MensRights31/10/18 08:47 AM
8

I had to the choice to be angry and hateful or just completely block her and her friend from my life and move on. I think you made the right call, but I'm not sure I would call it 'forgiveness'. For me forgiveness implies a willingness to accept and trust the person again. Cutting them out of your life isn't forgiving what they've done, it's exactly what I'd do to someone I haven't forgiven. You've just let go of the anger and moved on which is a great thing.
/r/MensRights18/10/18 07:33 PM
1

Nowhere did I say or even suggest that women were forced to choose between Christianity and witchcraft. Simply that it shouldn't surprise anyone that "Hardcore Feminists" would be drawn to a Goddess worshiping religion. I have yet to see anything supporting the claim that there are feminist witches openly calling for an end to logic and science. I assume you have a number of sources that would support that? Even pretending for the moment that it were true and there were say covens of feminist wi…
/r/MensRights17/10/18 09:37 PM
1

This reads like something from an insane conspiracy nutjob. "Hardcore Feminists are dangerous because they use Witchcraft to destroy science and logic!" Really? Does it surprise anyone that spiritual hardcore feminists would seek out a goddess worshiping religion? You can't expect them to follow Christianity which is full of shit like how they should be subservient to men and can't be trusted to teach or to "assume authority" over men. Never mind what it says about them during menstruation! If I…
/r/MensRights17/10/18 09:27 AM
2

Harbor House in Wisconsin accepts both men and women. The Taylor House in Arkansas is a dedicated men's shelter.
/r/MensRights09/10/18 02:02 AM
1

"Yes. It is fine. My shit works great! I've never had a single problem or complaint. Of course I couldn't consent because I was a baby! I don't care. I don't even remember it! Maybe it's not fine for you, and it sucks that your dick is fucked up, but I have no problem with it!" Really 30 seconds just isn't enough time. That's just the "My dick is great so who cares anyway!" response. Even if you get past that you have to address "This way is cleaner", "Girls like it better when it's cut", "I wan…
/r/MensRights08/10/18 09:28 PM
3

Tabloid TV shows are probably not the best platform to raise these issues. Especially when there are reports that the show manipulates their guests and events to make for better TV. source source.
/r/MensRights08/10/18 09:07 PM
4

The Washington Times is a conservative rag. Anything from them should be taken with a block of salt and a full understanding that they are pushing a political narrative. The Washington Times has published conspiracy theories that President Barack Obama was not born in America and that he was a secret Muslim, promoted conspiracy theories about the murder of Seth Rich (which the paper apologized for and retracted after a lawsuit), and published numerous columns that reject the scientific consensus…
/r/MensRights08/10/18 08:46 PM
2

It's risky to bring up to anyone who is circumcised. It can immediately put them on the defensive. "I was was cut and I'm just fine!" is the common response. No one wants to think there's something wrong with their dick. Circumcision is just not a topic I'd want to tackle with someone in 30 seconds.
/r/MensRights08/10/18 08:23 PM
1

There are no DV shelters for men even though there is almost as much domestic violence against men as against women. There are a handful of shelters for men around the US although not nearly enough.
/r/MensRights08/10/18 08:20 PM
7

I fully agree that there are a number of legal reasons why marriage is important but I don't equate marriage with commitment. You can be 100% committed to someone and not get married, just as you can be married and still constantly cheat on your partner. You don't have to be married to have a strong family, or a good relationship with your kids either.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 08:57 PM
2

I don't think that there is anything inherent to men that makes them more aggressive/abusive, I think men and women just tend to take out their aggressions in different ways so it shapes how they abuse their partners. It may be that abusive men attack less often but more violently than abusive women. One of the links posted above was this article showing that men were more often victims of psychological/sexual/knife attacks than severe physical violence.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 08:33 PM
3

I think it makes it impossible to get an accurate count of victims. I'm sure people researching DV are aware of the problem, but when something is largely unreported you can't even try to compensate for it without essentially guessing. We simply will not see accurate numbers for male victims of domestic violence until attitudes change and more men feel safe reporting.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 07:44 PM
3

It's hard to get solid numbers on it. Domestic abuse victims often don't report in general and a lot of men certainly don't because of shame, fear they won't be taken seriously, or worse that they will be blamed. Any numbers you can find on male abuse victims will only hint at the scale of the problem.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 07:30 PM
1

not excuses so much as contributing factors. The vast majority of abuse happens in a child's first year of life. It drops dramatically after that and continues to decline until it levels off around ages 11-16 before dropping again. It doesn't excuse women. It makes a pretty good case for paternity leave so people can keep an eye on their partner for signs of trouble and intervene when things may start to get abusive.
/r/MensRights23/09/18 02:35 AM
-1

Everyone has privilege, everyone has needs. I'm not disputing that, but you're wasting your time if you think you can make it into a game of numbers to show who is winning. Focus on what we can change, support the men in your life, try your best to educate the women who have been fooled into thinking that people concerned with men's rights are women hating incel Nazis or that feminism is a force for equality, but if you come at them with "Women have it so much better, men are the real victims" y…
/r/MensRights21/09/18 09:29 PM
-2

Men have less rights and privileges. I'd rather not turn things into the Oppression Olympics where we all bitch about who has more. The fact is that there are problems women face in society that need to be addressed and there are problems men face that need addressing as well. There's no need to compete. The problem is that one of the issues men face is that many feminists fight very hard to keep men from even discussing the problems they have. feminism is too often confused for egalitarianism, …
/r/MensRights21/09/18 09:12 PM
4

It's certainly being over-gendered as an issue. The most recent data I found showed the people committing abuse and neglect were 53.7% women and 45.3% men. Much closer than the 70% stated above. source The closest the report came to a number of 70% was when they took into account the victims relationship to their abusers over multiple reports for the same child. Victim data were analyzed by relationship of victims to their perpetrators. A victim may have been maltreated multiple times by the sam…
/r/MensRights21/09/18 08:38 PM
1

I am betting that sleep deprivation and and postpartum depression do play a role in the abuse of the youngest kids.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 07:05 PM
5

So 70% might just reflect presence and not necessarily some kind of predisposition to abusing. the stat could be total bullshit for all I know, but I would argue that the amount of time spent with a child should not drastically increase the likelihood that you'll suddenly be cool with beating the shit out of kids. The number of children whose father is entirely absent would certainly help reduce the percentage of of abusers who are fathers. That might actually be what you were getting at and I m…
/r/MensRights21/09/18 06:37 PM
6

There are certainly individuals that will look down on Christians (and often organized religion entirely), but that does not mean widespread discrimination is taking place. I believe that even in your most liberal metro area you'll find far more people who seek tolerance. I don't think you'll find too many of them scratching the cross off of their Coexist bumper stickers.
/r/MensRights09/01/18 09:16 PM
11

I am not here to make your education. You made the wild claim, it's on you to present the evidence. If you can't support your views it's your own education you should be worried about. Come with facts instead of conspiracy theories. I'm focused on the US because that's where I live, but the facts are that Christianity is the world's largest religion. Despite that pesky first amendment "building a wall of separation between Church and State." over half the US population feel that it is a "christi…
/r/MensRights09/01/18 09:09 PM
8

Why did we rename the Christmas markets in europe? If you're willing to expand this discussion to everywhere on the planet than I'll concede here that in some places Christians are discriminated against. In the US, at large scale however, it simply isn't happening. Why did we remove religion classes with classes over homosexuality and sex in general? Find me any state university, hell find me a community college in the US that has banned all classes on religion. One. Why do we teach atheism or I…
/r/MensRights09/01/18 08:20 PM
25

What does Google get out of this? I honestly think they probably started out with the best of intentions. More diversity has it's advantages and it helps the company image to be a progressive, accepting, supportive place for everyone. My guess is that they hired a few SJWs to help them with their goals of promoting a diverse environment and those SJWs went on to hire others like them into positions of authority at which point they did what typically happens when power hungry moral police come in…
/r/MensRights09/01/18 08:07 PM
11

All the silicon valley is a male discrimination area. Especially white males. And worse, christian white males. It seems like Christians have been trying for years to jump on the victimhood bandwagon, but I'm just not buying it. They keep insisting there a war on Christmas that doesn't exist. They cry foul over having to provide equal services. Basically as long as they aren't discriminating against others or trying to force others to conform to their sense of morality no one cares if someone is…
/r/MensRights09/01/18 07:58 PM
7

Registries are a terrible idea in general. If someone who has committed a crime is too dangerous to live in society they should be locked up, otherwise they should be free to live their lives without harassment. If we insist on keeping a sex offender registry, by all means include false accusers over people pissing in alleys or taking photos of themselves, but we'd be better off in general doing away with such lists entirely, sentencing people appropriately for their crimes, and then letting the…
/r/MensRights18/12/17 09:00 PM
1

Not every bad thing can be explained that way. The death of Elsa and Anna's parents for example.
/r/MensRights14/06/17 09:45 AM
2

If this were club penguin or disney.com I'd agree, but this isn't some website for kids and this guys account is 2 years old.
/r/MensRights12/12/16 09:17 PM
8

Yeah, I don't see the problem with this. Yeah, it's a lot of money, but it's being used to update facilities.
/r/MensRights12/12/16 09:15 PM
-12

What does this have to do with men's rights?
/r/MensRights19/05/16 11:58 PM
1

Personally I think reddit should leave subreddits alone so long as nothing illegal is going on there. I'll just stay away from the places that offend me. There's plenty of server space, even for people I don't agree with. Reddit just needs to grow a spine and be willing to ignore the whining of a highly vocal self-righteous minority even if it means some people will say mean things about them.
/r/MensRights06/02/16 07:21 PM
21

It's a SJW subreddit. The mod who banned OP also runs r/creepymensrights/ and a bunch of other empty subs filled with spam. No point worrying about being banned from the crazy spaces. Rational minds prevail elsewhere.
/r/MensRights06/02/16 03:48 AM
5

I think that it's fair to look up to athletes because they work hard at being good at something. It takes a certain amount of dedication and a willingness to push yourself, not to mention what it takes to test yourself against other people and be willing to lose and allow many many others to watch you fail.
/r/MensRights03/10/15 03:24 AM
1

this is certainly stupid, but not I don't think it really hurts Men or their rights...
/r/MensRights31/08/15 07:51 PM
1

Things got nasty in that thread, but the stuff like that only started after she responded by saying it was misogyny that people found her attractive. Once the children knew they had an audience, they were posting anything they could think of to get a rise out of her, which is exactly what they'd do for anyone else regardless of gender. Don't take the trolls seriously.
/r/MensRights19/08/15 09:11 PM
2

According to many doctors and medical organizations the non-aesthetic benefits are overstated and mostly nullified with the application of proper hygiene. That of course excludes the increased HIV risk (which is now the primary reason it is recommended), however that hopefully isn't an issue for babies and can certainly wait until a man is old enough to decide if it's worth the risk. There are also plenty of ways to reduce your risk of catching HIV without removing body parts. The procedure itse…
/r/MensRights12/08/15 05:37 PM
14

It's hard to know how much you'd miss something that was taken from you before you even knew you had it. I'm also blissfully ignorant of what I'm missing, but I also recognize that on the face of it, it's a totally unnecessary and fucked up thing to do to a baby. I can't support it on that alone. No reason not to leave men's bodies alone until they are old enough to decide for themselves if they want to chop parts off for aesthetic or religious reasons.
/r/MensRights12/08/15 02:08 AM
3

Whats the source on this? Where is it coming from?
/r/MensRights29/07/15 11:21 PM
2

I guess there's no such thing as bad press, but I can't help but think the movement could use some better PR
/r/MensRights20/05/15 08:38 PM
79

I prefer egalitarian. I used to consider myself a feminist but I really don't want to get lumped in with those crazies. I just want equality and fairness for everyone. MRAs seem to have a really bad rep for some reason, although I've never seen a crazy MRA in real life. (which isn't to say I haven't run into some disturbed hateful anti-women guys online, they just weren't speaking in the context of men's rights)
/r/MensRights20/05/15 01:31 AM
2

This happens everywhere in media. One of the best animated children shows in the history of western television almost didn't happen because Nickelodeon was convinced that boys wouldn't watch a cartoon with a girl as the main character. They asked test audiences and were genuinely surprised when the kids told them they couldn't care less if the character was a girl, they all just thought she was awesome. That show kind of had a built in audience already (being a squeal of another series with a ma…
/r/MensRights16/05/15 06:47 PM
2

There is a lot I'd add to this list, but I'm surprised carrying purses wasn't in it. I carry around so much shit already, but I'd love to be able to keep a few more things with me. Between my keys, phone, wallet, and the meds I have to keep on me, my pockets are just not enough. I've seen some guys with bags who are doing the everyday carry thing, but they all seem to compensate for carrying a bag around by filling it with knives and gadgets and survival gear. I just want to be able to carry thi…
/r/MensRights16/05/15 06:26 PM
3

Seriously though guys, use your turn signals.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 11:08 PM
-1

She did a 15 minute set at the comedy club, and he also did a 15 minute set. They did they same amount of work. If she understood and expected that she wouldn't be paid at all, why was she surprised when she learned Todd got $60? Why would she have gone back after the show to ask the owner why she wasn't paid the same as Todd? Do you think she did that just so that years later she could complain about it in an internet video? Maybe it's more likely she wasn't certain about why there was a differ…
/r/MensRights17/04/15 08:05 PM
-4

What part of her story was a lie? The club owner even admitted the story actually happened, just not for the reason she assumed it did. She was asked if there was a time in her life when she got paid less than a man for the same amount of work and she gave them one. She was paid less than a man for the same amount of work. She didn't admit that she lied, she said explicitly that she told her story as she remembered it "All I can say is I remember that story exactly how I said it.". You can say s…
/r/MensRights17/04/15 01:58 AM
0

It's amusing how people like you always seem to grossly exaggerate how funny she actually is when in reality she's a lying, sexist, and unfunny asshole. I'm not sure who "people like me" are, but it's okay that you don't like her comedy. I however do, and these are both valid opinions to have. She certainly deserves some flak. Not so much for telling that story (which is probably how she remembered things), but for completely missing the point after being corrected. Saying that she shouldn't hav…
/r/MensRights16/04/15 10:31 PM
-1

I'm more inclined to believe that she made an honest mistake. She was asked if there was ever a time in her life she got paid more than a man for the same job and told this story. What she got wrong was thinking the reason she got paid less was because of her gender. I think this happens a lot. I'm not saying there aren't some asshole employers in the world who pay women less because of sexism, but I'd be willing to bet that far more often it's because of other reasons and "It was because I'm a …
/r/MensRights16/04/15 10:15 PM
3

How long should we wait, she's like 45 now and still looks good.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 09:06 PM
9

meh. I think she's very funny. To each their own I guess. EDIT: or we can just downvote people for their opinions and go back to the witchhunt I guess. That works too...
/r/MensRights16/04/15 08:59 PM
5

Is it just me or have female beauty standards not really changed that much over the last 50 years. We had Heroin chic in the 90s. Probably the most drastic turn in female beauty standards I've seen in my lifetime.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 10:44 PM
3

After talking to many people, I find the majority of supposed "feminists" are just people who were only ever told feminist dogma. Personally I think most people who call themselves feminists are good people who just haven't learned the word egalitarianism yet. Most of the feminists I've know (my past self included) just wanted equality for women. I prefer to believe that those who want inequality favoring women are a vocal minority.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 01:36 AM
-1

It's a shame you're being downvoted. I read the title as "another father who was murdered after the wife slapped their daughter" and wonder wtf was going on until I saw this is the same father shot by police discussed several times already. It's a big story that points to problems with how men are viewed by police as well as the issues with police abuses in general, but we probably didn't need a fourth discussion about it in as many days. I'd rather OP have posted this somewhere it hasn't been b…
/r/MensRights28/02/14 08:59 PM
22

Medical bills have always been dismissible So all those stories about people who are bankrupt from emergency room visits and hospital stays are lies? Money means nothing when you're dead but poverty and suffering mean a hell of a lot when you are alive, and your debts and financial burdens effect your family and loved ones long after you're gone. Absolutely people should seek medical attention when they need it, but you can't fault people for worrying about that sort of thing.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 12:01 AM
2

Seriously. I've always been pretty opinionated and concerned about any kind of injustice or inequality that don't personally effect me or anyone I knew. I guess everyone has varied levels of empathy. I'm less the traditionally masculine male, but I've certainly always cared every bit as much about the rights of women as I do the rights of men.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 02:38 AM
2

That's true, even in states where it's illegal to fire someone for being gay (or straight in this case) actually proving it is another thing entirely. Not an easy thing to prove in many cases. As easy as the laws are to circumvent it's still better to have them than not.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 10:32 PM
6

This very well could be legal. It's legal in many states to fire someone for their sexual orientation. It's usually people getting fired for being gay that you hear about so this is an interesting case. Perhaps some good will come out of it and it will lead to more laws being passed making it illegal to fire someone because of their orientation.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 08:48 PM
4

I'll agree that reproductive health care, including birth control, should be equally covered for both sexes. A vasectomy should be covered every bit as much as a tubectomy and pills (when/where available) and condoms should be covered as well. It's enormously beneficial to society to have birth control options freely available to anyone who chooses it. But that seems like a big cost to the tax payer to prevent silly people from having kids Just like it's a big cost to tax payers to stitch carele…
/r/MensRights11/11/13 10:12 PM
24

I wonder what that comes to after taxes. I'm don't think I'd trade 17 years of my life and whatever torments they suffered in prison for even a few million.
/r/MensRights24/10/13 03:53 AM
1

If you were to broaden the topic to "transitional housing organizations sometimes turn away homosexuals" you see that the topic has nothing to do with gender at all. Except there are many transitional housing solutions exclusively for women, many of which don't care about homosexuals, where as there are comparatively few transitional housing solutions that allow men at all, let alone cater to their needs exclusively, so every one of them that discriminates effects men disproportionally.
/r/MensRights27/07/13 07:10 AM
2

I agree. I never said that. What I said is that a men's right issue should be reserved for an issue that affects men because they are men. Look, homophobia is not gender specific, but in this case we have men being turned away from a number of the extremely few places set aside for men in need of transitional housing. Women are completely removed from this particular issue. It is gender specific. Even gay women are more likely to find support. This may not effect you, or someone you know, but it…
/r/MensRights27/07/13 04:23 AM
0

So abortion rights isn't a women's issue, because not every women would get an abortion? circumcision isn't a men's issue because not all men are circumcised? Something doesn't have to apply to every single man or women for it to be a legitimate issue facing that respective gender. If a significant subset of a gender is effected by something, it's an issue for that gender.
/r/MensRights27/07/13 04:05 AM
4

By this same logic, genocide is a feminist issue because female victims of genocide are female. No, a more reasonable (but still extreme) comparison would be how institutionalized murders specifically targeting lesbians would count as a feminist issue (which it would).
/r/MensRights27/07/13 03:50 AM
8

depends on what you rub it with I guess
/r/MensRights01/06/13 02:58 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter