TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Kentaro009 Archive

View 4 posts and 791 comments by Kentaro009 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

How many bad mothers would even admit they were bad mothers? I don't think I have ever seen someone admit that. We have an awful lot of people that think they are wonderful parents though!
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/25 07:09 PM
2

Do you resent being a Mother like the OP?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/25 06:19 AM
0

You are too full of shit to even have an honest discussion with. "this WGTOW army is why populations are plummeting, here are citations that have nothing to do with that" Sure, buddy.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/25 06:12 AM
0

If China, which is one of the most powerful totalitarian nations to ever exist can't keep birth rates up, then what makes you think other countries can through force? I am open to your evidence, but you seem to just not provide any. It sounds like you are making a strong case for fascism.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/25 06:03 AM
4

Yes, and as those countries modernize, they all have birth rates that begin to fall dramatically. If anything, you prove the point. In the countries where women are treated worse, they have more children. So obviously "those evil men just need to treat women better" would not be a solution to the problem. If you have some compelling evidence that it is WGTOW, I would like to see it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/25 05:57 AM
7

Slay Queen! Have that baby for money!
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/25 04:46 AM
7

If a man has to make it "worth your while" for you to have children, then the children are just a bargaining chip to you. That is sociopathic and you should not have children as you would be a terrible mother. A kid brought in to this world deserves more than being raised by your nannies while you play tennis.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/25 04:43 AM
1

Angry during pregnancy, angry during child birth, angry about the social responsibility of motherhood, yet somehow none of this manifests in how they treat their child. Possible, but I seriously doubt it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/25 04:38 AM
6

If you don't want to have kids, then don't have them. It isn't necessary to live in this fantasy land that it is men's fault that you never had children. Take some responsibility for your own actions. Is this all just so if you regret never having children when you are old you can just say it was out of your hands?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/25 04:36 AM
7

Good mothers want to have children, they don't have to be begged or pleaded in to it reluctantly. Same thing with good fathers. There is nothing wrong with not wanting children - just don't have them!
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/25 04:30 AM
2

As the product of a career woman that resented being a mother, a lot of these women just shouldn't have kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/25 04:28 AM
17

Birth rates are plummeting across the world and it is related to economics and modernization. It has nothing to do with WGTOW. Women that don't want kids can't be made to want them just by a man jumping through a few hoops. The types of women that deeply resent pregnancy and birthing children wouldn't make good mothers anyway so its best they avoid it entirely.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/25 04:21 AM
10

Women have so totally jumped the shark in terms of their hatred of men generally that they are in no position to criticize any man who makes similar statements about them. If they claim not to hate men themselves, they will still justify why its okay that other women hate men. This is why stats involving men committing violent crime and sexual assault are always brought up. You possess original sin by being born a man and are guilty by association - whether you have actually done anything wrong …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/25 02:07 AM
3

Yes yes men bad, women good
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/25 10:43 PM
10

Exactly. Nature is eating your own young, a dog eating cat shit. Nature is lots of things that they never mention. In the state of nature, a man would just rape any woman he wanted. They pick and choose what they want for their appeal to nature arguments.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/25 09:37 PM
10

What does nature have to do with anything?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/25 09:03 PM
5

Basically, any story involving sexual assault is automatically credible and any story involving someone lying about sexual assault is immediate unlikely and highly suspicious. I often wonder if these people realize how ridiculous they sound.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/25 04:03 PM
2

I have heard the same story many times from different men. I have also had women start nasty rumors about myself to damage my professional career. Women are not the paragons of truth and virtue that people like to think.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/25 03:59 PM
13

I know several men that have the same story of spurning a woman who later started a rumor that he raped her. Its a great way to get back at someone through reputation destruction without even having to do much. If you are a professional with a career to protect, you really shouldn't even engage in casual sex these days.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/25 06:47 AM
3

I am an attorney, haha yeah just chase that paper instead of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/25 03:33 AM
1

I get a lot of likes on hinge, but the women are usually quite ugly.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/25 03:27 AM
1

6'
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/25 03:24 AM
5

You came in to this thread having no issue with the OP being critical of men but had issue with comments critical of women and zeroed in on them. Have some self awareness.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/25 03:08 PM
4

Except OP isn’t sour grapes as well? You are full of shit and you know it.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/25 02:57 PM
6

I didn’t say everyone. You have to make someone seem more unreasonable to argue with them. You have no problem with the OP having major issues with men in dating, when I merely say basically that men have similar issues, you have HUGE problems with it. Examine your own biases and knee jerk reactions.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/25 02:53 PM
8

Yes, yes. Every man who observes this is wrong and just bitter. When in doubt, gaslight and deflect.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/25 02:46 PM
15

I make middle six figures, mid 30's, no kids, have my own home, workout/in good shape. Dating is still insanely difficult and a complete waste of time.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/25 07:17 AM
29

Not sure if you date women, but a lot of them are really terrible. This idea that men need to massively improve themselves as a group and women need to do jack shit is why so many men are turning to the right and red-pill adjacent content. Even the left-wing men I know are talking about this horseshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/25 06:59 AM
8

The point is reciprocity. If someone isn't willing to be reciprocal, they aren't a good faith actor and everything else can be ignored.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/25 09:17 PM

It used to be, if you were sufficiently rude to a stranger, you would get your shit rocked. If didn't matter if you were a man or a woman. There used to be a decent chance of getting fucked up if you were disrespectful. Now we have a lot of people running around that are in dire need of having their ass beat.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/25 08:25 PM

I have had many experiences watching a man politely ask out a woman, and the woman raising her voice in a way to draw attention to the situation and imply he is a creep. Part of it is attention-seeking behavior and a big part of it is women have been told this type of behavior is acceptable their whole lives. There is also a sort of currency you get when you are perceived as a victim. It is a lot more interesting to say to their friends later "a man was a creep at the bar and I told that bastard…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/25 08:12 PM
1

Whether this is creepy to a woman will depend entirely on how attractive she finds the man. If she finds him sufficiently attractive, he will be considered sensitive, sweet, and endearing. If not, he a creep, potential stalker, and potential rapist.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/25 07:07 PM
5

Even women using men for money is somehow men’s fault. It really never ends.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/25 09:03 PM

It is what I have observed about the world, buttressed by what men around me have observed about the world. I simply won't be gaslit about it. Women highly value men's income, resources and career. I understand that it sounds unkind to put it bluntly, but it was I have observed throughout my life.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/25 04:20 AM

Yes, these are generally true statements. You are correct, it is a generalization.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/25 04:16 AM

I think the wall is determined by the preferences of the opposite sex. All it is referring to is perceived desirability by the opposite sex. If women started vetting men for youth and fertility instead of career and resources, then men would hit the wall the same as women. Women complain when it is their own choices and preferences.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/25 04:11 AM

I have been told unironically that just believing the wall exists is misogynistic. Basically, if you aren't constantly blowing smoke up their asses and telling them what they want to hear you hate women.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/25 04:03 AM
13

Yes, just like women wanting men of a certain height makes it harder for them to get in to relationships. All preferences by definition narrow the field of potential mates you can have. Men need to start taking a page out of women's book with these discussions. Women never feel the need to justify any of this, they just want what they want.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 08:37 PM
22

Even if we were to grant your whole argument, what does it matter? Just like women are allowed to have irrational preferences (men's height for example) - men are allowed irrational preferences as well. Unless you will expect women to justify all of their preferences logically and rationally, men should view your judgment of their preferences with extreme skepticism.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 07:48 PM
1

I have heard this as well as a reason for divorce. I find it extremely hard to believe someone could marry without knowing their spouse’s political leanings. Maybe if the wife was particularly stupid or something.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 04:20 PM
1

That's pretty impressive if true.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 02:36 AM
0

I don't even understand why any men want to get married anymore, its not a life-long commitment. Tons of women on tiktok talk about divorcing their husbands just over vibes.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 02:33 AM
-1

Women are still highly traditional in the areas of life that tradition benefits them. We can all do our best to resist social pressures, but resistance has a personal cost. Try going on a date and not paying for a woman, and you will already be thought less of by the majority of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 02:29 AM

What are we supposed to do? Just whine all day? Modern dating sucks, and yes women have more than their fair share of responsibility in that. What is incessantly whining about it going to do though? How are you going to enact this change you seek?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 02:28 AM
6

You are delusional if you don’t think sex is a cornerstone of romantic relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/25 10:10 PM
1

Right, so your position is that racism is okay if the data supports it. So own your position, and quit dancing around it. The fact that you can't engage in the hypothetical shows your intellectual dishonesty. Hell, you even say "may very well change things" you refuse to bite the bullet and acknowledge the position you are defending.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/25 04:16 PM
1

Do you not understand what the issue is? If new data came out tomorrow that highly linked a particular race to criminal activity, would it then be okay to be racist against that group? This is the question that everyone is refusing to answer. What about particular religions or ethnicity? A lot of you just don't seem to understand the application of principles in a broader context.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/25 04:03 PM
0

Its extremely simple, you are seriously over-complicating this. The OP has a principle he would like to apply, right? Okay, so what is that principle? It is that through both data and personal experiences women have a justified fear of men that is not morally wrong, or is at the very least morally neutral. (1) If given sufficient justification, fear of particular groups is morally right. (2) Women have sufficient justification to be fearful of men. (3) Therefore, fear of men is morally right. Ev…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/25 03:54 PM
4

It isn't about them being the same, if you think it is, you are entirely confused. It is about the arguments being used to justify a particular position. It has nothing to do with "not being able to understand" or lacking humanity or any other of your silly moral grandstanding. The OP uses two points to reference his view that women's fear of men is justified and in no way morally problematic. (1) Women acquire negative experiences with men that justify their fear of them. and (2) We know throug…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/25 06:44 AM
13

You already said fear is justified based on experiences and data. So under your world view, classism would be absolutely justified. In fact, fearing random poor people you don't know would be more justified than fearing random men you don't know. How do you not get that?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/25 04:38 AM
3

"Racism is okay, if your facts support it" Fixed that for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/25 04:22 AM
2

Yes, exactly. There is nothing inherently wrong with mentioning that black people commit more crime, but it is a racist dog whistle because often people saying this are trying to find a politically correct way to disparage the race as a whole.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/25 04:21 AM
5

Right, so there is nothing wrong with racism. It is just about how you parse the data. That's your world view you are forced to commit to. This only even makes sense if you think racism is morally neutral.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/25 04:12 AM
2

The problem is, that if it was true of race, then being racist would be acceptable. So it is only because the data does not come out differently. So if the data justifies racism, then there is no problem with racism. Basically, if the data was different, then racism would be no issue at all - which is absurd. As the other poster said, this also completely justifies classism as poor people are over represented in crime. This worldview doesn't stand up when you examine it thoughtfully.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/25 04:09 AM
10

You need to take intro to philosophy, and intro to logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/25 04:05 AM
9

Exactly! How does he not see that?! Its begging the question.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/25 04:03 AM
15

Your position is incoherent, and you aren't justifying your position at all. It's all vibes, like so many views. It doesn't even stand up to 5 seconds of scrutiny before being destroyed.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/25 04:01 AM
13

You have already said "the reason is because there is no correlation" Meaning if there was a correlation, then the views would be justified. So basically, you are just telling racists and sexists to show their work like a math teacher. Lmao You are dodging the question. If this isn't the case, then why are you bringing correlation up at all?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/25 03:58 AM
12

So if someone could show a statistical correlation, their racism would be justified? Do you see how insane that sounds? The statistics have no bearing on how you should treat an individual. That's whats wrong with this view.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/25 03:55 AM
25

You knew it would come up because it is correct. Racists use statistics to justify their beliefs all the time - it's actually extremely common. You haven't distinguished these views at all. Why would a racist not be entitled to their negative views if buttressed by experience under your world view?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/25 03:51 AM
48

If you feel the same way about racist people having a fear of black people, then you are at least consistent. If having negative experiences with a particular group justifies negative views, then it would seem to me that all racism and sexism is justified if the individual has sufficient negative experiences with that group to justify their views. E.g. Happens frequently enough and under random enough circumstances The irony is that a lot of these strident man-hating feminists would condemn raci…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/25 03:46 AM
1

The question I have asked multiple women in this thread and has never been answered: Would it be a good idea to tell a woman interested in being married to wait until her 40’s to start looking for a husband. I have asked this like 5 times, and because you are all so intellectually dishonest you blow right past it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/25 05:35 PM
1

Do you think that if you told women that you know to wait until 45 to get married that would be good, actionable advice? If you think that, you genuinely don’t care about those women. Acknowledging harsh realities of life is not a revenge fantasy.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/25 05:32 PM
1

Women don’t spend money on men. That’s why men don’t care about women’s resources. A woman could be a billionaire, if she’s not spending it on you it doesn’t matter. The cheapest women I have ever dated also made the most money.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/25 02:55 PM
-1

Having a negative opinion is not the same as bullying or stigmatizing Women have negative opinions of men all the time, is there a reason I don't see you piping up when women do that? If you just want to say "you shouldn't do that" that would be one thing, but can we not live in this fantasy land where everything that isn't glowingly positive is bullying, stigmatizing, harassment etc. etc. etc. I really wouldn't mind how morally self-righteous you all are if you were consistent.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/25 05:38 AM
5

If acknowledging that something exists is stigmatizing or bullying, then we now have such loose definitions of these words that they lose all meaning.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/25 02:43 AM
1

Yes, the bullying is quite vicious. I definitely see now what the OP was referring to.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/25 02:40 AM
5

I hope you can persevere, they should make a film out of the harrowing bullying you have endured.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/25 02:26 AM
10

I am not backtracking shit. News flash: We all have times in our lives where we date, and then those periods end. Our windows close. YOU CAN ABSOLUTELY MISS THE BOAT ON DATING. TELLING WOMEN JUST WHAT THEY WANT TO HEAR ISN'T HELPING THEM. Not entertaining your delusions is not misogyny. The funny thing is, if your (bad) advice led to worse outcomes, you wouldn't care - because your intentions were good. Honest question: Would you feel bad at all if one of your friends took your advice to heart a…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/25 02:20 AM
1

So believing that many women are bitter and acknowledging that dating becomes harder as they get older. If this is the merciless bullying you are all enduring, then I am playing the world's smallest violin for you. You want complete agreement or its misogyny, bullying, harassment etc. etc. etc. The pearl clutching really is too just too much.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/25 02:08 AM
10

Wait a second, you think if someone acknowledges that women decline in desirability that this is somehow hating single childless women? If I said men lose strength and virility as they get older, would that mean I hate men? Are you seriously this delusional? Now it makes sense, any comment that you don't like is stigma, misogyny, or bullying. What's hilarious is you keep posting this as if this is some mega own or something.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/25 01:57 AM
0

This honestly sounds like the unmarried childless version of incel logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/25 01:22 AM
6

Self-fulfilling prophecy. You imagine every stranger is thinking terrible things about you, and that influences the way you interact with them negatively. They perceive you to be unpleasant and unkind, and in turn aren't as nice to you in return. You then see people being less kind to you, and you end up feeling your initial belief was justified. What's funny is this is literally just the incel train of thought for why women are evil.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/25 01:21 AM
0

Most people are just going about their life and are barely giving two thoughts to other people. If you walk around imagining all of these people are thinking terrible things about you, that has to be some sort of mental illness.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/25 01:16 AM
2

You mean in this particular sub full of red-pill people? I thought the claim being made was about general life, not reddit or this sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/25 01:14 AM
5

Its wild that you walk around imagining other people are thinking all of these awful things about you.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/25 01:10 AM
37

I don't see them bullied anywhere. I see lots of single, childless women and no one gives a fuck. I do however see people on instagram and tiktok making their perceived victim status their entire personality.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/25 12:59 AM
9

Exactly. The first date has nothing to do with "choose better" Honestly, almost none of these posts are ever inviting good faith discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/25 09:18 PM
1

If you are pleading ignorance that is fine.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/25 04:42 PM
2

What is a fantasy about it? Is it true that a woman would lose attraction if that happened? It isn't really a fantastical scenario. That just sounds like dodging whether its true by saying "that's unlikely to happen" You are making it seem more silly by describing a man defending their spouse as Batman. If you have to make someone's position seem more unreasonable to argue with it, you are admitting they were correct.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/25 04:37 PM
0

I had no idea. It’s actually pretty hard to distinguish feminists from fetishists given how wacky their world views are.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/25 03:53 PM
4

That sounds great, but this dainty, sweet, effeminate man simply will not hold a candle to an archetypal masculine man. These traits don’t run together across cultures by accident. But hey, while his woman is being bludgeoned he can run around the corner and call the cops.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/25 03:50 PM
1

Even the most feminist woman in the world does not truly believe this. If any woman got attacked in front of their effeminate boyfriend they would immediately get a reality check and lose attraction for the boyfriend incapable of defending them. A lot of women may not even realize how powerful and rapid their loss of attraction would be. A lot of these sentiments sound warm and fuzzy until the rubber meets the road.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/25 03:43 PM

Except adding systemic to the definition of racism was merely a strategy implemented recently to allow wokescolds to be racist.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/25 04:24 PM

I am really noticing the worm start to turn on this. These man-haters are starting to radicalize a lot of men, particularly younger ones. I think these conversations are about 20 years too late.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/25 04:21 PM

Sure, and men also wouldn't act like that was comparable to 8-10 hours of work that day.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/25 04:44 AM

Women can't even cook anymore. Preparing meals must mean throwing frozen crap in a microwave.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/25 04:23 AM

I have been on hundreds of first dates in my life, and women have paid twice. Many of them want 90/10 relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/25 03:16 AM

Ma'am, by your logic a 55 year old woman having lots of casual sex because men are horny with no long term prospects is still at the top of her sexual marketplace value. If you believe that, you are insane. Clearly you have never bothered to educate yourself on any of these topics, so why are we even discussing anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 09:18 PM
-2

Then you don't understand the concept so it would be impossible to have the conversation with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 09:15 PM
-2

The wall is not about attention from men or sex. It is about marriage or long term relationship potential from men that those women would deem acceptable - this is what precipitously declines for women with age. Its crazy that we are having these same conversations week after week.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 09:08 PM

Of course it matters, because that's the argument always being made. You don't think the potential career you would have had in an argument over lost income matters?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 03:10 PM

If you blame your lot in life and low ambition on your children? You are worse than a parasite.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 03:05 PM

A lot of SAHM assume they would be some brain surgeon or politician lighting the world on fire if not for having to care for their children, and that is simply not the case. The vast majority of these low ambition women would still be low ambition and working a low income job if they did not have kids. They blame their children and spouse for not achieving their goals in life which is especially pathetic.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 03:02 PM
-5

I don't doubt that some people will be delusional until the grave.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 07:39 AM
2

Its really fascinating to me how many marriage apologists there are that try to convince other people to get married. What the fuck do they care? Why are they so invested in this topic? I could understand the motivation if you were extremely religious, but usually its someone who is completely secular.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 07:36 AM
-2

Yes, every divorced older woman is simply choosing not to be remarried. They are dodging the lines of suitors on their walks home. Keep telling yourself that.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 07:33 AM

Of course he doesn't. His world view is simply whatever will grant him a crumb of punani.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 07:29 AM
-7

Well your first point was that it is a meaningful enough difference to point out, and now its not a meaningful difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 07:27 AM
-9

Sure, but that isn't really related to the desirability of older divorced women as a whole. A 25 year old divorced woman is going to have a much easier time getting remarried than a 50 year old.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 07:25 AM
1

Yes, exactly. Pointing out that some men still get married and remarried as if that shows anything is idiotic. There are people that ruin their lives with gambling or heroin too, but we wouldn't justify those bad choices by pointing out that people make them despite knowing they are bad choices.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 07:16 AM

There will always be a contingent of men who make the same bad choices over and over. The ones that get raked over the coals in a bad divorce and then go right back out there and get married again in short order.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 07:13 AM
-11

Men are more likely to remarry than women because older divorcees are not as desirable to men. Men prioritize youth and beauty and women prioritize income and career in their potential partners. A lot of women who don't get remarried didn't have the option to.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 07:10 AM
-1

Most divorced men remarry because the types of men that will lose half their assets in a bad divorce are liable to be taken advantage of again. Chumps will be chumps. It isn’t a ringing endorsement of marriage that people that are foolish continue to be foolish.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/25 06:04 PM
3

The idea that older undesirable women poll as saying "I don't want to be remarried" as if that settles the matter is laughable. It really seems like a lot of women's world views are fueled by ignoring harsh realities of life.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/25 01:40 AM
-3

It’s really just a lack of introspection. Having tons of options in online dating gives them a big ego and so they don’t prioritize personal growth. It’s the same reason you will see beautiful women in their 30’s and 40’s unable to keep a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 07:01 PM
4

If a woman isn’t in to you almost immediately, it is extremely hard to move the needle. If a woman says she wasn’t attracted to you initially and you “grew on her” that means you aren’t her type but check certain boxes related to income and career. A man should be extremely wary when a woman says that you aren’t the type she usually dates or not her type. As the economy gets worse, you will see more of these types of beta bucks relationships. I am already getting women on bumble telling me that …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 05:14 PM
6

Okay, I'll explain it to you very simply. Women who are older are not able to get remarried because men prioritize youth and attractiveness in their partners. The mistake you are making is you are assuming that all of these older divorcees are choosing not to be remarried yet have a line of suitors ready to marry them. Saying "you can't fire me, I quit" is not the same thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 05:17 AM
1

Yes yes, men love marriage and women hate it. Men are always clamoring to be wed, but their damn girlfriends won't put a ring on it. To live in such delusion, it must be a paradise.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 05:10 AM
8

Any studies created in the soft social sciences should be viewed with extreme skepticism and looked over with a fine tooth comb. Not saying they are all terrible, but they are not known for their intellectual rigor.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 04:14 AM
1

I agree with you that broke people have less to worry about in divorce. Can't get blood out of a turnip! My perspective is more for men with good income and good career.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 04:12 AM
6

Look at conversations surrounding pre-nups on women centered subs. Man makes more money > "He shouldn't want pre-nup, he has no faith in marriage" Woman makes more money > "Yaaaaas Queen, get that pre-nup, protect yourself!" There is nothing more red pilling than seeing all the men I went to college with starting to get crushed in these crippling divorces.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 04:07 AM
7

So is it untrue that weddings are regarded as her day? That they are extremely expensive and have lots of financial pitfalls? That your assets may be split even if spousal support or alimony is not granted? Notice how you ignored all of that? Was that accidental, or intentional? what was the point of even responding?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 04:03 AM
3

Cherry picked what? What did I say that is untrue? What do you want? An entire dissertation? Its the internet.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 03:44 AM
4

That's a convenient response any time your world view is challenged.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 03:33 AM
12

Anyone who acts like marriage benefits men and is a terrible deal for women, ask yourself why its only women complaining in relationship subs about not being married, like r/Waiting_To_Wed The wedding is "her day" - the ring, supposed to be 2 months of your salary. As a man, you are supposed to shut up and pay for it. Tens of thousands (in some cases hundreds of thousands) down the drain. Hell, I went to a wedding not too long ago held at a prominent country club in my city and the flowers were …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 03:19 AM
-1

No one expects you to walk on eggshells. You were lying and you know that. You are clearly obsessed with this topic and will spend the rest of your little life on it. Pathetic.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 10:53 PM
0

I guess because gaslighting exists as a concept no one can ever be lying or delusional. Especially considering I clearly pointed out her posts were conflicting. Brilliant contribution.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 10:46 PM
1

They are two different claims. You didn't say men are inherently more violent. Just that they are inherently violent. As the other poster said, you are being deliberately obtuse. Either playing dumb or are actually dumb.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 10:45 PM
-1

No, you are eager to demonize men because you hate them. That's fine, but don't act like you are on a crusade for women's safety. You are just like white racists that are obsessed with crime states when they want to demonize black people. Your prejudice isn't noble.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 10:40 PM
0

You went from people claiming "men aren't more aggressive or violent" to people taking issue with the claim that men are "inherently threatening and violent" See how dishonest you are?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 10:35 PM
1

I have never seen anyone claim this at all, ever. It must be interesting to live in such a fantasy land.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 10:25 PM
1

A lot of these studies are extremely inaccurate anyway. I wouldn't put much stock in the soft social sciences.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 06:52 PM

Oh okay so women treat men bad because men treat them bad? Well then men treat women bad because women treat them bad. If you justify your behavior in that way you are already a shitty person.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/25 04:03 PM

Women already do this. It’s so funny when women make threats about things that are already extremely common place in dating.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/25 02:56 PM

How is this complicated? The men with lots of dating options aren’t the ones that are lonely.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/25 02:48 PM
4

I am not even sure it would be better to have BPD than be a narcissist. In terms of which is worse I don't know if there is a clear winner.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/25 02:03 AM
12

Is the valid observation in the room with us right now?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 06:28 PM
9

Demonizing and otherizing the people you want to hate is a win/win because you are no longer a bad person for hating them. It is the same reason women that hate men will talk about how men commit the majority of violent crime, you are guilty by association and that is good enough. If someone makes a factually correct argument, you can also just avoid addressing the facts by calling them an incel or a misogynist - this is something we see all of the time in this sub. This isn't unique to women th…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 10:40 PM
8

I don't doubt it could be multiple, I just find the cognitive dissonance interesting. I took feminist philosophy in college, and I remember reading the feminists that said all sex involving a penis is rape. They weren't some fringe thinker on youtube, they were academics that are respected and studied in class.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 10:12 PM
7

I don't think steroids or bitcoin has anything to do with redpill.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 07:58 PM
13

A lot of these people unironically think redpill just means woman bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 07:53 PM
1

So what exactly is your point? Just that North Korea is having a tough time of it? Holy shit, stop the presses! In related news, water is wet.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 07:51 PM
31

When you criticize feminism > "actually feminism is a tapestry of all sorts of different beliefs, so that criticism doesn't apply because that is just one person's opinion" When you criticize redpill > "look at what this one dumbass on youtube said, and he also said he is redpill. Lol redpill is so stupid"
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 07:50 PM
1

That country has undergone serious famines and is on the verge of collapse. You are either lying about studying it or delusional if you think a feminist movement out of South Korea is the cause of a North Korean population collapse. No one is denying that their birth rate is low, so that whole wall of text is irrelevant. The claim being made is that a South Korean fringe feminist movement is the cause for the North Korean population collapse. This is absurd on its face. You are the one making th…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 07:03 PM
1

It’s a free country, if you want to be all over the dating scene in your 80’s that’s your choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 05:49 PM
4

You think North Korean birth rates are related to the 4b movement? Do you know anything about North Korea? You are either trolling or you need to be on meds.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 03:40 PM
0

I didn’t say anyone is or isn’t dating. You are no longer of dating age though. At that point you are a cadaver looking for another cadaver.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 03:23 PM
0

They are already sad.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 07:48 AM
0

A lot of you are so fucking goofy, I could say water is wet and you would argue. 50 is too old to be out in the dating scene.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 07:25 AM
1

Well let me ask you, do you want to seriously be out here dating at 50? why not 60? Hell, lets all fucking date until we are 90. I mean, at some point enough is enough. People need to be realistic.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 07:11 AM
7

Then why do I only hear about this online? Literally no man or woman I know that isn't a basement dwelling redditor would even know what you are talking about or what your little movement is. Also, what do the apps have to do with dating as a whole? People meet in lots of different ways. Almost all of the healthy relationships I know the people met through friends or work. Maybe that is part of your problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 07:09 AM
-1

Are you serious? Because at some point you are too damn old.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 07:07 AM
-3

Also, someone aging out of dating is not the same as "quitting dating" If you are 50 years old, you aren't "quitting dating" - you are no longer of dating age, you need to start looking at senior care facilities instead. Too many people think of the dating span of their life to be literally until the day they die.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 05:57 AM
7

300 people can't be wrong. Its you.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 05:47 AM
23

This is a silly question. There is no significant exodus of women from the dating market just like there is no significant exodus of men from the dating market. People that believe this are terminally online and need to go touch grass. To the extent that anyone of dating age (18-40) is leaving the market, they are leaving because they are not desired enough to get the outcomes they want. "you can't fire me - I quit"
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 05:45 AM
7

I wouldn't brag about it at all if it wasn't the topic. I agree its silly to brag about the achievements of others. If women will talk about how awful men are, then it becomes relevant. If it weren't for men, we would all be living in mud huts. I don't think it is unreasonable to at least acknowledge that.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 05:19 AM
2

Even allowing for discrimination, men have historically been killing it in technological advancement in pretty much every conceivable culture and place. That is pretty undeniable. It's wild that this is controversial. The funny this is, men are actually pretty chill about this. If women invented 99% of things, we would never hear the end of it!
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 04:07 AM

as soon as I see mansplain I stop reading, as nothing intelligent follows.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 04:04 AM
14

I think the mere fact that men have invented 99 percent of technological achievements makes up for any flaws we would have as a gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 02:30 AM
3

??? I can acknowledge an expectation without engaging in it. What the hell are you talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 06:44 PM
2

I didn't say I was.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 05:46 AM
17

Yeah its kinda funny, basically you are expected to be a nice guy but never think of yourself as a nice guy. The tight rope you are expected to walk for approval from women is too ridiculous to even attempt.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 03:10 AM
11

If anything, being too wordy like that probably comes off as desperate and over-eager to lots of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 02:09 AM
6

This is actually a great point. The fact that she feels so entitled to an in-depth profile from a perfect stranger tells you how she is going to be on the date. She is above you and you are beneath her, you are but a worm that must prove you are worthy of buying her dinner.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 10:31 PM
10

I remember when people would use male model photos and put that they were a neo-nazi or a domestic abuser in their profiles, they got a ton of matches. Women genuinely do not care about your character nearly as much as they would have you believe. The idea that women aren't shallow is feminist propaganda.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 10:15 PM
42

"character-less and bland" - that describes 99 percent of women's profiles as well. Most people are selecting based on looks in online dating, and very few are selecting off your profile. The type of man that is trying to impress women with a well thought out profile is already behind the 8 ball in dating and isn't desirable.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 10:09 PM
0

This is an interesting fantasy land to live in.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 10:05 PM
1

Not sure what you are talking about. Are you in the wrong thread?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 02:55 PM
6

I would say it is the bottom 20 percent of men who are not very visible on a day to day basis. They are unemployed or underemployed, and they don't leave the house much. They have no social hobbies and are not connected to their communities.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 04:52 AM
2

I already said initially that women don't owe them anything and I don't even know what can be done about it. Are you just arguing with an imagined person that doesn't exist? Being concerned about a potential problem is not endorsing it or fantasizing about it. Can you have a good faith discussion? Is that even possible for you? Hmmm?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 04:02 AM
4

Yes, very confused. Talking about coups and revolutions. That's your own thing. How you gathered anything about that is beyond me.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 03:58 AM
5

You are confused. A bunch of men acting independently and lashing out at society in different ways is not a coup or revolution. They don’t know each other and are in no way coordinated. Of course the way you depict it would be ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 02:49 AM
3

I hope you are right. It certainly isn't a dream of mine that a bunch of wackos shoot up a grocery store. Just because I predict something doesn't mean I endorse it.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 01:15 AM
7

You seem confused about this entire discussion. It isn't about men not being able to control their impulse towards violence. It is that the problem will keep getting worse and ignored until it becomes really bad. The idea of telling all of these dispossessed and bitter men to just be chill is certainly an interesting one though.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 01:15 AM
11

Also, begging women for empathy is really pathetic. Particularly when a lot of those women hate men. I can't think of anything less masculine than being a sad boy and begging in that manner. A lot of these men need to embrace stoicism.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 12:46 AM
6

It isn't something that can be solved, so I am not sure what anyone is supposed to do. People will start to really take notice when men with no criminal history start going crazy with violent offenses. That's my prediction, men going postal will see a marked increase. It also isn't any woman's job to do anything either, so its a weird situation. Everything bears a social cost, and it will keep simmering until it completely boils over.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 12:29 AM
3

Every time I would go out with a leftist woman, they couldn't even mask their hatred of men for a single two hour date. Its insane.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 12:24 AM
3

You absolutely don't have to agree with everything. Just don't deny that you contribute to the toxicity of the discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/25 09:53 PM
10

Yes, and you are part of the problem because you demonize men for these choices. People like you help Trump and the right wingers more than 1000 canvassers.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/25 09:05 PM
3

The word is pertaining to rights, it doesn't always refer exclusively to voting rights - although often times it is referring to voting rights. Hilarious that you are so confidently wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/25 09:00 PM
13

Every time the left is criticized for the way they address men's issues, they just double down. This is why they will continue to lose elections and young men are going to keep drifting to the right.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/25 08:57 PM
6

Okay well you don't like men and that's fine. What is the purpose of continuing this discussion? What do you hope to achieve? Other than radicalizing more men with your hatred of them?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/25 08:56 PM
16

It sounds like you were given a coherent explanation but you don’t like that. What is the purpose of your question?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/25 06:29 PM
6

This article is 9 years old?
/r/PussyPassDenied25/01/25 05:16 AM
-1

They do a worse job, and are prouder of it! Peak Dunning-Kruger syndrome!
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/25 10:47 PM
5

What exactly am I supposed to do about it? All I can do is promote social stigma and shame, which is exactly what the OP is against. There used to be a time where if you sired a bunch of bastards it was considered embarrassing , shameful, and an indication that you weren't a good person. Women who had bastards used to have to move towns and start a new identity somewhere else. Obviously there is a harmful cost to shame but it also is good because it enforces norms that are positive to society. T…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/25 10:42 PM
5

You can find an exception to any rule. A big part of life is hedging your bets by making the best possible choices you can. The idea that "something can always go wrong so might as well not even try" is a loser mentality.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/25 10:35 PM
10

Nope, but is highly probative data that one should consider if you are going to have children. If you aren't mature enough to get married, then you aren't mature enough to be having children and the poor outcomes will reflect that - as they so often do. I am a criminal defense attorney, almost all my clients come from single mother homes.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/25 10:30 PM
11

If children of single mother homes didn't perform worse on every conceivable metric and have such a high degree of criminality, then no one would care. This negative perception isn't falling out of the sky - it is buttressed by decades of statistical and observational data. Our society has never been more permissive, so the idea that there is too much shame surrounding this issue is pretty silly.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/25 10:26 PM
5

This has been debunked many times, men have significantly lower standards than women. Honestly been talked about to death.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 10:57 PM
17

It depends on what you define success as. Will women have genuine desire and attraction for average men? Probably not. Can an average man get a wife if he has a good career and simps for her? of course. The difference is a really attractive man can walk through the front door and an average man has to swim through the moat, dodge the archers, and climb up the wall.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 10:34 PM
3

Either you are lying or you live in a very unusual city.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/25 11:50 PM
1

There is no meaningful question, how are you going to limit what an 18 year old does? You are an idiot.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/25 10:12 PM
1

You aren't engaging with the real questions here, so don't bother posting anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/25 09:45 PM
2

You are absolutely arguing that men and women need to be viewed through a different lens when it comes to personal responsibility and agency. Men are more morally culpable, and women less so.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/25 05:48 PM
8

What really sealed the wall for me personally as a real concept was seeing all the women in their mid to late 30's who lie about their age on dating apps.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/25 06:44 AM
6

Simply saying "InB4 consenting adults" doesn't make it not true. Its funny how you identified the most common argument against your silly position but didn't decide to make an argument against it.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/25 06:33 AM
3

I think its fine to provide special protections for women, but they shouldn't be able to vote if they do not have the agency to make their own consensual choices in relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/25 06:31 AM

Many of us have known this for years. Women are vibes first, facts after.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/25 06:16 AM
0

Is this even something that can be debated? They perform worse on nearly every metric compared to children of two parent households.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 06:34 AM
1

Sounds like something a witch would say.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 05:10 AM
-5

Correction: tens of thousands of witches were murdered
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 03:02 AM
1

It would be pretty cool to just scream WITCH when someone pisses you off and have them dragged away.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 12:50 AM
4

The whole point of calling redpillers incels and misogynists is to avoid contending with the points being made. It is an acknowledgment that the points can't be argued, so they go for character assassination.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/25 08:19 PM
8

A lot of men need to learn about the difference between stated preferences and revealed preferences.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/25 01:05 AM
12

I don't understand why we keep getting women posting about how they are so baffled by this subject. It genuinely feels like gaslighting at this point.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/25 01:01 AM
-2

What percentage of those party girls are cheating on their spouses? Eventually, the bill comes due.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/25 04:33 AM
2

So people are getting married at the same rates as prior generations? Or just that people live together?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/25 09:22 PM
1

Yes, but another way to parse this data is to ask, of the half remaining, how many will be single for the rest of their lives compared to prior generations?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/25 08:46 PM
7

These women will be 50+ and still looking, hell, a lot of them won't stop until the grave.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/25 08:43 PM
0

As opposed to metaphorically raping them?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/25 08:39 PM

I do think a lot of men need to be way more careful with casual sex these days. A promiscuous woman 50 years ago might be a woman with 10-20 sexual partners. Now, there are a lot of women with 50-100 prior sexual partners and that isn't even particularly high these days. I have gone out with 5 women that have had an awkward talk with me about their incurable STD and were surprised when I did not want to go out with them again. Women used to be the stop-gap for the spread of STDs in the heterosex…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 05:59 AM

You are expecting me to answer for what some other man said to you at some point in time. The fact that you don't seem to understand why this doesn't make sense is what is concerning.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/25 09:22 PM

Its only relevant if every goofy thing a woman has ever said is also relevant to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/25 09:03 PM

I didn't say that, so what does that have to do with me? Are you going to blame me for Daddy not hugging you as a kid, too?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/25 08:22 PM
8

I don't have a problem with someone disagreeing, but it makes no sense to agree with someone and then add a bunch of nonsense about conservatism that has nothing to do with the OP. I had to reread the OP twice to make sure I wasn't missing something because it was so far left field.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/25 12:57 AM
12

It sounds like you agree with the OP that women are bad at taking initiative. Why do you need a diatribe after that? Just say, OP is correct. Its funny how contentious some of you are even in agreement.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/25 09:43 PM

Why is it surprising that a large percentage of people don't love their partners? I am sure many people are miserable in their relationships and a fair number probably hate their partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/25 06:12 AM
-1

No, she would just tell her son to "man up!" and that he needs to understand that women have it worse dontcha know?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/25 06:04 AM
1

It is actually really fascinating that political lesbians have deemed themselves experts in homosexuality, heterosexuality and what its like to be a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/25 05:25 AM
1

Replace masturbation with any other ultimatum or request of a partner. How many women would tolerate any ultimatum coming from a man?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/25 12:56 AM
2

My only problem with this is that if a man asked a woman to stop how they masturbate in private, he would be described as a controlling psycho. Anytime you swap the genders on these sorts of demands women generally don't grant men the same veto power in their personal lives.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/25 09:49 PM
5

There is lots of data on men in prison having above average testosterone levels. Testosterone makes you more aggressive and will give you problems with impulse control which can get you in to bad situations.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/25 05:34 AM
8

Men are more likely to commit crime because we have much higher levels of testosterone than women. Women are less violent because they are smaller, weaker, and have lower testosterone levels than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/25 03:58 AM
2

Schrodinger's feminist. They are simultaneously powerful and pathetic victims depending on the argument they are making.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/24 02:34 AM
1

Who is trying to convince you of this? You seem to think it is an individual man's responsibility to show you that men are "worth the effort" If a man told you to explain to him why women are "worth the effort" you would tell him to fuck off. Yet you think men owe you some explanation? The fact that you unironically ask this shows how myopic you are. Don't like men? Don't date them. It is your life, you are arguing in to the abyss.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/24 12:09 AM
2

Its not an argument. I am being facetious because all of the women in this thread are suggesting that abusive men are master manipulators and it is near impossible to spot an abuser. Which is, of course, ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 05:03 AM
4

You can choose whoever you want, the idea that men are preventing you from making your own choices is a fiction in your own mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 11:01 PM
1

The central thesis from the women's posts in this thread are that men are master manipulators and spotting abusers is often impossible.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 10:58 PM
1

They could just be master manipulators waiting for their chance to strike.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 10:52 PM
12

That's great for you, but obviously impractical for most women. If a woman was asking you for advice on how to spot an abuser, saying "just avoid all men for the rest of your life" would sound pretty stupid to most people.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 10:47 PM

What was the purpose of your silly diatribe then? Also, you acting like you are interested in a good faith conversation is pretty rich.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 10:45 PM
8

The same way that if you are looking out for a predator in the jungle, and you perceive everything in the jungle to be a danger to you, then you will not be able to spot the true danger.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 10:43 PM

Except you just implied it, you are a strange one. It isn't a "defensive reflex" for someone to reply to what you just said to them. But keep up with the psycho-babble you learned from your therapist last week.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 10:38 PM

I understand how that helps your world view, but no, none of my friends are doing that stuff.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 10:33 PM

Pick whoever you want. But if you pick the guy covered in face tattoos, maybe don't be shocked when he isn't a great guy? There are all sorts of ways you can filter for pieces of shit, you don't have to do it though. It's your life.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 10:27 PM

Do you think abusers don't have certain things in common that are pretty readily discernible? This is the throw your hands in the air and give up mentality that it is impossible to spot someone who is likely to assault or abuse you, it is nonsense.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 10:23 PM

When women say that they can't tell who the good men are, they are basically admitting they lack basic common sense and situational awareness.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 10:16 PM
4

Better than dying for radfems!
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 07:27 PM
4

If women aren't being conscripted, I wouldn't feel guilty at all about not going.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 06:56 PM
9

If a woman will be servile to you, she will be servile to someone else. That's how I have always felt about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 06:13 PM
8

Not sure what country you live in, but look at how the U.S. treats its veterans. I don't blame anyone for not wanting to serve.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 06:11 PM
2

Why do you think they aren't stupid? I am an attorney who has represented many of them. I guarantee if you took all sex workers as a group and measure their I.Q. it would definitely be below the average.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 06:08 PM
6

So when women avoid war its fine, and when men do they are traitors?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 06:04 PM
8

While I agree serving for sex is stupid, what exactly should they serve for? A country that hates them?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 06:03 PM
1

Its the same reason men that aren't attractive give up on dating. Your dating marketplace value goes down, and these women say they are "over dating" as if on a whim they could begin dating again like when they were 25.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/24 02:30 AM

No man resents a woman making them wait. This is nonsense. Men resent being made to wait by a woman who has slept with dozens (or in some cases 100+ men) on the first date. There is a huge difference between the two.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/24 04:57 AM
0

None of those have to do with romance, even if we were to grant your silly assertion to be true.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 08:29 PM
2

If you get your kid's dick circumcised for aesthetic reasons, you are likely a pedophile.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 08:28 PM
0

Tell that to all of the people in this world that die in squalor.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/24 05:07 AM
4

The idea that people are in control of how much money they make is the dumbest part of this post.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/24 12:42 AM
3

Do you think I am going to argue with you if you are suggesting it is a bad idea to merge finances with a woman?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 05:45 AM
5

The biggest problem men make in dating is trying to "understand" women's choices in dating as if they are rational actors.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 04:41 AM
4

For decades men who are unmarried and don't have children were characterized as not suitable for promotion due to not being "family men" Not sure if you are just really young and that is why you are not aware of this.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 03:22 AM
4

Lol what? It absolutely matters. If the argument is that promiscuity makes you worse at pair bonding, then you are dodging the question to say that it doesn't matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/24 07:10 PM
2

If someone is successful, does that mean any choice in a partner that they make is automatically a good one?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 10:20 PM
1

Every type of person has existed since the beginning of time. Did you think this was actually an intelligent point?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/24 12:30 AM

Women just aren't generally very good at threat assessment. That is part of why they pick bear.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/24 02:49 AM
3

If you think all women are super hygienic then you are an idiot. Those of us that date women know that this is NOT the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 08:14 PM
4

I am 34 and have no problem finding younger women to date in the 22-28 age range. If you are a career professional that takes care of themselves, there is no issue at all. Women will tell men (1) that they are never the prize (2) that they won't be able to find younger women if they want to (3) that men aren't desirable enough to women to have standards and preferences It's all nonsense. A lot of women's dating strategies are predicated on men having low self-esteem.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/24 08:00 AM
7

Except many child support payments far exceed costs to take care of children. It is merely alimony by another name when the figures get ludicrously high.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/24 05:09 PM

Damn you got exposed for lying so quick. Lmfao
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/24 03:48 AM

If that is happening, and there is no discussion and its just them bragging - then those guys are stupid. I personally don't think the solution to someone being stupid is to join them, but I know we all have different world views.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/24 03:45 AM

Basically, she is saying she is very happy about the types of men that are willing to fuck her. That's cool, I guess? Good for her?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/24 03:08 AM

Imagine bragging to strangers on the internet.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/24 03:06 AM
7

A man willing to fuck a woman once or twice is not the same thing as a man pursuing a woman for a relationship. Crazy that people still need to be told this..
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/24 12:17 AM
1

The people I know that wants kids the most are the ones that seem the least mature.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/24 04:34 AM
11

Shitty parents call their son's low maintenance. They aren't low maintenance, they just caught on quickly that you don't give a fuck.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/24 04:33 AM
5

No, that's actually the opposite of what I just said. No one even has ever said that dark triad traits alone will get you laid if you are ugly. You are arguing against no one.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/24 03:48 AM
5

I think both can be true. They aren't mutually exclusive, and no one ever suggested dark triad traits were all it took to get laid. If you are a handsome man with dark triad traits, it is much easier to get laid. What makes getting laid easier than being willing to lie nonstop to someone?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/24 03:42 AM
-3

Yeah, is the point that men should stop whining about it? I don't get it.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/24 03:36 AM
6

Are you saying women are attracted to these dark triad traits or that they aren't? You seem all over the place. You seem to accept that they are, but then say handsome men "outweigh" the negative implication of these traits by being sufficiently attractive - which is suggesting women do not like these traits.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/24 03:31 AM
3

Additional requirements to date women can be found in the library of Alexandria.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/24 12:42 AM
-4

Obviously this is a contentious issue even among lesbians, as evidenced by their divorce rates
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 11:13 PM
3

I have wondered this before, all you can do is follow your instinct. A lot of times women will straight up tell on themselves with this though and say it directly or say "you aren't my normal ty'pe
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 08:08 PM
1

That's said to men all day, every day. What planet do you live on?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 07:14 PM
3

Progressing in relationships is a general marker for a well adjusted and healthy person. People trying to normalize being alone and single is just a way to avoid doing the hard work of relationships. No one has to be in a relationship. The same way you don't have to be in good shape or wealthy or have a good career. Its far easier and less work to not be in a relationship, and people are lazier than ever before and gravitate to instant gratification.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 12:06 AM
6

My Father, who has been divorced 8 times, always used to say "everything is wonderful until the new wears off"
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/24 07:13 AM
10

You seem to want to see things in an idealized way - the way things "should" be. Not the way they actually are.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 10:38 PM
3

Oh is the point to just agree with everything you say instead? My mistake, lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 11:03 PM
7

Men are being informed by their experiences dating women. They don't get these ideas from TikTok.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 09:39 PM
18

There is no such thing as unconditional love.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 02:26 AM
33

Are you jerking off as you write this? TAME ME MOMMY
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 04:49 PM
8

The most pathetic thing a man can do? Is taking up hobbies or change his appearance to try to get women. Life is short, just do what you want.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 05:46 AM
1

Sure, but not all poor people are ultra violent.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/24 08:03 PM
67

There are many women that have a sexual attraction to violence. Its why so many guys in prison have 3+ baby mommas.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/24 02:49 AM
1

Go to any divorce attorney in your city and get a consultation. Ask them if a prenup is a 100 percent protection guarantee for your assets. All of them will tell you no.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/24 12:12 AM
1

Where do you live where you can be charged with manslaughter for not helping someone who is drowning? That certainly isn't the case in the United States.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/24 03:21 AM
3

A great example of this "always in the dating market" mentality is women in relationships that constantly post sexy photos to their instagram.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 08:41 PM

Everyone goes for what they perceive to be their optimal match. Someone can be doing that and settling. That's literally the whole point of settling - getting with what you believe is your optimal match. Your optimal match may also be who you settle for.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 04:19 AM

The only way you wouldn't see this obvious massive change is if you aren't paying attention or lack experience. The number of people you see settling for and marrying people that they recently talked shit about once they enter their 30's is insane. So many women that will hold anti-marriage views, then once they hit 30, its like a switch has flipped and their anti-marriage views get replaced with a desperate desire to marry. I have seen this happen multiple times, and even when asked about it, t…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 04:11 AM
24

The issue isn't a lack of courage. It is simply that modern women are more interested in rejections that involve humiliation and unkindness than women in prior generations. If someone asks you out politely, you can refuse politely. I have personally observed this many times. A man will approach a woman, and instead of getting a "no thank you" you get an extremely unkind reaction designed to humiliate the man for asking. These same women will be the ones in their 40's writing articles on huffingt…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/24 11:24 PM
-1

Unfortunately, lots of people lie about things even when they have absolutely nothing to gain.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/24 04:32 AM
2

I have been on dates where feminists would have a strong opinion on a particular issue, and you ask one follow up question and they know literally nothing about the issue they just made out like they were really passionate about. Its so cringe!
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/24 11:04 PM
0

four dates total before getting a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/24 02:42 AM
-2

You are an extreme outlier (assuming you aren't lying)
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/24 02:37 AM
8

What percentage of dates in general lead to lasting relationships? Less than one percent?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/24 01:46 AM
3

We live in the real world where women highly prioritize a man's income. Maybe in your fantasy land that is true.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/24 01:39 AM
3

Who is more expendable, a man is who is in the top 1 percent for income, or a 26 year old attractive woman?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/24 01:38 AM
3

If you deliberately seek out particularly wealthy men, should you be shocked that they act differently than other men? This isn't rocket science.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 11:25 PM
6

I specifically used the phrase top one percent. Do you expect to deliberately seek out the top one percent of wealthiest men and expect them to act like other men?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 11:24 PM
6

I am not even sure what your argument is, they shouldn't do it because its bad? No shit, want to make a thread about how water is wet too?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 10:57 PM
17

If you are a trophy wife that enjoys a life of luxury with an elite level man, you will probably tolerate your husband cheating. This happens all the time in lots of different cultures. Its not a fantasy of mine because I have no envy or desire for that lifestyle. Pointing out that something exists is not the same as approving of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 10:56 PM
32

It isn't "Men can do as they please" - if you think that is what it is then you totally missed the point. It's that high value and desirable men will often cheat and step out of their relationship and this is something to be aware of if you are a woman trying to seek out a top 1% man. Those men can find women who will tolerate their behavior if their current woman won't. If someone doesn't like it, how about not seeking out those top one percent men? If anything women want to have their cake and…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 10:11 PM
1

Please don't give advice if you don't know what you are talking about. Having sex with a woman who is under the influence is not rape unless she is too intoxicated to consent. People have drunk sex all of the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 09:44 PM
1

Any time you have sex with a woman, text her the next day asking if she enjoyed herself. This record may help you if she tries some slick shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 09:43 PM
1

You didn't say anyone was? Re-read the OP. Interesting how the goalposts change.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/24 10:45 PM
1

So you admit no one is stopping you from having your opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/24 05:28 PM
1

Do you make room for the possibility that some women enjoy anal sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/24 04:17 PM
1

Women that are avid feminists and vocal in their hatred of men. Women that wouldn't take their husbands last name. Lots of sexual partners. Ugly tattoos or too many tattoos.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 10:38 PM
0

Some states call it "spousal support" and there seems to be some distinction between the two. I wonder if alimony data is including spousal support. For example, people often mention that Texas doesn't have alimony, which is technically true, but it does have spousal support.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 10:03 PM
7

They are allowed the opinion, and others are allowed to think they are being ridiculous. Someone thinking you are silly is not the same as people preventing you from having an opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 09:43 PM
3

First time of the year? I don't even know what you mean.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 02:36 PM
8

Women in prior generations didn't mind rejecting men, but they did their best to not hurt people's feelings. Now, women enjoy making rejection a humiliation ritual and are more mean spirited. So lots of men have checked out.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 04:21 AM

No need to even respond if you don't want a conversation, It's the internet, pace yourself
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 02:49 AM

You have to watch women's actions, not what they say.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 02:44 AM
3

Most women don't even know what tren is...
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/24 09:42 PM
5

Working out and bodybuilding is massively underrated in terms of attractiveness. The women saying they don't like it are coping hard and couldn't get those men. I agree though, I enjoy lifting and the idea of doing anything specifically to attract women seems pretty pathetic.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/24 09:41 PM
2

Ehhh as someone who has some familiarity with bdsm, a lot of people talk big but they like the idea of it more than actually doing it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/24 11:04 PM
7

Sexual preferences aren't the same as dating and relationship preferences. Plenty of women enjoy being submissive in the bedroom but don't want to be bossed around outside of the bedroom. He sounds like he is mostly referring to a sexual fantasy.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/24 10:58 PM
2

Violent crime statistics would tell us they are actually massively different.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/24 08:33 PM

Its so sad it becomes funny.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/24 08:31 PM

You are talking about four dates?! Lmfao This would be like 1 percent the average man's sample size...
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/24 08:28 PM
49

There is absolutely no way those numbers are accurate. I have been on hundreds of restaurant first dates in my life, and women have paid maybe three times total.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 07:40 PM
6

Doctors and attorneys, etc. etc. etc. etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 07:09 PM
5

This doesn't happen in any other profession? Not sure where you got that idea... All sorts of licenses have ethical codes of conduct that are not merely based on legal vs illegal.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 06:27 PM
1

Don't hold your breath, lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 06:23 PM
4

I am not sure the actual definition is what matters here.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 11:55 PM

Unfortunately, I don't think its a joke at all. If you look in all the threads discussing it, a ton of women are defending choosing bear. If this is all trolling, it is extremely well coordinated trolling.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 11:50 PM

You are confusing hypothetical and metaphorical. Hypothetical demands you imagine that the scenario is real. A hypothetical is useless to discuss or think about if you aren't taking the hypothetical seriously. Why even bother with the hypothetical, of course it isn't real - that's what makes it a hypothetical.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 11:46 PM
9

Yes, I feel the same way about super right wing women, they can be really obnoxious.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 11:40 PM

It is interesting how it is taken as literal in all of the subsequent discussions, and then it turns in to a metaphorical conversation somehow - and no women literally meant they would rather choose the bear.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 11:39 PM

I am getting at the fact that their beliefs would make them acknowledge how toxic and prejudice it would be if it was black men broadly. When it is men broadly, for some reason they don't achieve that moment of clarity.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 11:35 PM
7

I have, I have seen conservative women characterize themselves as anti-feminist on dating apps.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 11:33 PM

Do you think feminists would make the same point if it was black men versus bears? Or would they back peddle entirely?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 11:32 PM
3

Yes, and also there will always be people who hide their true beliefs as well. All you can do is do your best with the warning signs you observe.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 11:25 PM
5

You are dead wrong about the generally accepted definition of rape in the United States. It is NOT a defense to rape to not have used physical force.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 11:20 PM
28

Then I guess all rape in which a woman isn't physically restrained isn't really rape. Better reverse and remand all of those rape convictions!
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 11:12 PM

Men are far less likely to call the police if a woman assaults them. See also, definitions of rape that do not include female on male sexual violence. See also, feminists laughing when man has his penis cut off in domestic violence incident. Give me things feminists don't give a shit about for $700, Alex.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 10:59 PM

That's not too bad, I do powerlifitng competitions but am 240 lbs myself
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 02:31 AM
5

Yes, exactly. If your standard for terror is a man literally existing, then it gets a bit silly.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 02:22 AM
2

Are you even that strong?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 11:36 PM
-1

Mere presence isn't terrorism, nor is it threats.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 11:32 PM
1

I can stop telling jokes, you will stay unhinged. That's the difference!
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 11:31 PM
3

Keep being terrified of 4 billion people on the planet, I am sure it will take you far!
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 11:26 PM
-1

Obviously not to that extreme, but I am thinking of it if she is wary of you versus thinks you are harmless. Do you want to be perceived as harmless? I don't think so.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 11:24 PM
1

A woman fearing you is far closer to admiration and respect than a woman feeling that you are too timid and harmless to be a danger to her. It is a continuum of perceptions and human emotions, and being perceived as harmless is the kiss of death.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 11:15 PM
1

Do you think a wimpy and cowardly man that a woman perceives as safe is trying?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 11:09 PM
3

Its not about reality, its about perception.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 11:07 PM
4

Very cool, I mostly do strength training so I am sure you would beat me :)
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 11:00 PM
1

Buying a gun has nothing to do with dating at all, not sure what you are on about. And you say like I sound like I am making a joke? lol
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 10:56 PM
2

It's okay for you to be afraid.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 10:55 PM
2

What's your mile time?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 10:52 PM
2

I understand that it may sound satirical, but I think it goes back to the age old question. Are women more attracted to the bad boy archetype or a guy that she describes as safe? Anyone that has any experience with women knows the answer to this question.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 10:49 PM
8

I would choose to be in the forest with a woman and a bear. I don't have to be faster than the bear, just faster than the woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 10:45 PM
5

I am a man, more terrifying and powerful than the mightiest of bears. So check your tone when you talk to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 10:29 PM
3

You shouldn't even be talking. Remember: I am a man, your worst nightmare. Scarier than the mightiest bear imaginable. Cower in fear, lest you incur my wrath.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 10:22 PM
20

Why not? Women use the same logic. If women can use it, so can men.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 09:53 PM

Schrodinger's feminist: Women are simultaneously victims and empowered depending on what suits them at the current moment. So terrified of men they would like to be with a bear instead.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 09:52 PM

Feminists desire to not be perceived as racist outweighs their hatred of men. If you re-framed the question black men vs bears, all these women would choose black man. Its the same reason feminists simp so hard for Islam. Feminism really is just a weird salad of incoherent and inconsistent beliefs.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 02:11 PM
12

100% You can't negotiate with these women that hate men anymore than a black person can negotiate with the KKK. Why give their views any more oxygen, accept them as unhinged and move on. One thing I will say, is these women seem to belittle and humiliate men quite a bit considering they are so "terrified" of us. That's how you know its all bullshit anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 02:54 AM
8

Lmao yeah they realized how fucking stupid and unhinged it makes them look and now comes the back peddling.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 02:48 AM
6

The point is anyone who picks bear is too stupid to have a conversation with.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 02:45 AM
15

A lot of women have been completely brainwashed to hate men.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 02:43 AM
16

When interviewed, pedophiles often believe that a large percentage of the population is attracted to children. It is often how degenerates cope with degeneracy - by maintaining the belief that it is totally normal and everyone does it. I don't know what circles you hangout in, but all my friends and I could easily afford prostitutes - but we aren't interested in getting STDs by having sex with a woman who has already had sex with 10 men the same day and is only having sex with us for money. Even…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/24 04:48 AM
11

Most men find prostitutes pretty disgusting. Its only a special subset of highly degenerate men that are willing to have sex with prostitutes, but the ones that do so are doing it quite frequently and spending a lot of money on it.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/24 04:02 AM
1

The idea that any large portion of men are obsessed with virgins is feminist fantasy.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/24 02:36 AM
1

Except that this is the experience of all the men I know in their 30's Are we all just exceptional? I guess its possible.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 08:06 PM
9

It doesn't make sense for you to allow some dumb meme to dominate your world view. You are giving some stranger on the internet way too much power.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 03:30 AM
4

What are true HVM? Sounds like you are engaging in the no true scottsman fallacy. Also, your suggestions that Chads cheat less is all something you pulled out of your ass. The biggest reason people with more options cheat more is because they have more options and therefore more temptations on a regular basis. Its not really brag-worthy for a fat ugly man to never cheat on his wife if he never had any takers. You also sound like you are elevating physically attractive people to an almost super-h…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 03:22 AM

I am naturally pretty aloof, and women seem to really like that. I think being needy and emotionally clingy is the biggest turn off to women long term.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 03:09 AM

Fuck! The point! You just missed it!
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 10:59 PM

Yes, I think having safety concerns is different than actually saying someone may be a rapist or serial killer. If you suspect someone of being a rapist then you shouldn't go out with them. I think it is a form of humiliation ritual to demonstrate to the man that you think lowly of him and that he needs to prove himself to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 10:47 PM

I know it is somewhat irrational, but anytime the weird "you might be a rapist or serial killer" joke thing comes up, I ask if they would go out with a man who would say something like that about them and I unmatch.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 10:41 PM

I imagine it would work out badly, I am not sure what your point is?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 10:39 PM
16

Purple pill debate is all about taking extremely obvious concepts and making them seem profound and complicated.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 10:14 PM
5

You all already do that, so what is the difference?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 10:07 PM
10

Who are all these men claiming men will step in to protect women? As evidenced by this thread, you are arguing against no one. Even the men claiming they would step in are only suggesting they would do so for loved ones. Literally everyone in this thread agrees with you yet you are still acting like you are taking some minority position in the eyes of men. lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 10:00 PM
6

Women already talk about how men are inherently dangerous and untrustworthy unless proven otherwise. Why should I protect some strange woman I don't know, just because I am strong? I will assume that woman who is in danger is a bad person until proven otherwise. They are going to despise men whether you help them or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 09:56 PM
5

Yeah I will take my personal experiences over your nonsense. Dating is not a team sport, so I don't really give a shit what the experiences of other people are.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 04:03 AM
10

I am 34, and have waaay more attention from women now than any other time in my life. It's funny how people will try to gaslight our real world experiences with goofy ass studies.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 03:43 AM
0

The ones clearly outlined that you chose to ignore.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 10:55 PM
1

This is basically the same problem when you see studies that show vegans live longer. As vegans are more likely to be health conscious, exercise, and not drink.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 09:41 PM
1

This is a great point. Even if we were to grant that married men live longer all other things being equal, we would still need to ask the question if it is worth it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 09:38 PM
0

You should control for outside variables, that isn't something that is really debatable.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 09:35 PM
3

Is it a metaphorical discussion? What are you talking about? It seems like a pretty straight forward hypothetical to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/24 08:18 PM
1

Men would hypothetically care, if women were ever actually interested in spending money on men the way men spend money on women. Some of the cheapest women I have ever dated also made the most money.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 05:04 AM
4

In my experience, a lot of career women think that men should value them highly as a result of their careers and income (even if they plan on never spending a dime on a man). They think men are "intimidated" by their career when in reality they are arrogant and have inflated egos.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 11:26 PM
1

That would be true if there wasn't tons of political and cultural zeitgeist baked in to the question.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 09:36 PM
2

I don't think you know what virtue signaling is, the other guy explained it pretty clearly. You are getting stuck up on the word virtue. Have you never heard this phrase before? It is a well known concept in the United States, maybe it just isn't a phrase where you live? All virtue signaling means is that someone is trying to show a particular political or moral persuasion, generally contrived and insincere. They are trying to signal to other members of their political group (in this case femini…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 09:30 PM
2

You are not really applying logic to the hypothetical. The real question would be: in the presence of a bear or a man, which one is more likely to kill you? Feminists are so delusional that they believe any random man is more likely to kill them than any random bear. Reason # 10487 why feminists are crazy.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 09:27 PM
5

The main tenant of feminism is that women are victims and men are victimizers. So, it is basically saying "women are more likely to be killed by a man than a bear". To hear feminists tell it, the odds of a woman being murdered by a man on any given day is like 50 percent.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 04:52 AM
8

So your prejudices are justified, other people's prejudices are not. Same old story, a tale as old as time.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 08:35 PM
1

34 year old man, dating is great for me. Lots more women interested in dating me than in my early 20's
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 12:45 AM

a negative number of single women without kids? What the fuck does that mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/24 11:09 PM
1

I thought there was no wall for women? Which is it? Is there no wall for women or do people hate older women?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/24 10:27 PM

I have heard the quote, "the redpill is a suppository" and I think that is really true.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/24 10:20 PM
2

You already admitted they are stupid and that you are emulating them. So you are stupid as well, so lets just stop this conversation and I will let you be stupid by yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/24 04:23 PM
2

Newsflash: If someone is being a dumbass, the answer isn't to also be a dumbass. If your argument is you want to be as dumb as they are, then go for it. Lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/24 04:19 PM

Mandatory paternity testing at birth is also an often contested issue. Why do we not have mandatory paternity testing if it so simple to do these days? Fact is, it would be extremely destabilizing for a society for all of those poor chumps to realize they are not the Father.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/24 08:21 PM

No, the point is to acknowledge the truth, what someone does with that information is a totally different issue. If some men have trouble getting women due to things out of their control, that is not the same as advocating that they be allocated women. That is ridiculous. The point is that both (economics and dating) invoke the just world fallacy. Honestly, what would feminists even do if they couldn't make up fake positions for people to hold?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/24 06:23 AM

I agree with this. Women can care about height, looks, money - it is totally fine. What is really obnoxious is the moral grandstanding and acting like they don't care about those things. Some women seem to think they are genuinely higher lifeforms.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/24 06:19 AM
1

It's almost like you totally missed the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/24 06:08 AM
0

That wasn't the point at all, you are being deliberately obtuse.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/24 06:03 AM
9

I don't even know what you are talking about. Its like you are AI or something.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/24 11:37 PM

Acquiring a female friend because you think they will have certain advantages over a male friend seems like catching pokemon or something. That's not a real friend, that's some machiavellian bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/24 11:29 PM
11

So everyone should just be unreasonable because some people are?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/24 11:23 PM
1

It's funny how a lot of these left wing women will talk about systemic and social reasons for every outcome until the cows come home except for when it comes to dating. They go from being a communist to a capitalist pretty quick!
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/24 09:29 PM
3

We got Mr. Thesaurus over here.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/24 04:57 AM

If they really are too high, then the women suffering from those delusions will be punished naturally through outcomes. You can't make people be more reasonable or rational. I think there is some truth to this based on my experiences, but I think it has more to do with OLD.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/24 03:52 AM
2

This is a silly post even by PPD standards...
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 10:35 PM

I go out with women all the time that say they have 3-4 FWBs Are all these women lying?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 06:13 PM
-1

So what's the margin of error?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 05:00 PM
3

This is the correct answer.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 04:41 PM
3

The reason why its a bad look is women initiate marriage conversations and marriage ultimatums. So why is it that they are so eager to get married and then so eager to get divorced? Could it be the financial incentives involved?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 04:36 PM
-3

So we are trusting the responders to that survey to be honest about infidelity. Someone is willing to do one of the most dishonest thing a person can do, cheat on their husband or wife, but they are above lying on a survey. Giving that study a margin of error of plus or minus 100 percent. This is a big part of why the social sciences are a total joke.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 04:28 PM
9

Men are generally more tolerant of weird/socially awkward women than women are of socially awkward men.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 04:24 PM
50

In my experience, a lot of autistic people don't truly realize how off-putting their behaviors and mannerisms are to others. I have tried going out with an attractive autistic woman before, and I could not get over how annoying she was (even though most men think they would be able to tolerate it if she is hot enough) That shit gets old real fast.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 04:13 AM
9

Ehhh I wouldn't say most, that seems a bit extreme. I will say that the accusations that are 10, 20, or 30 years later always seem like bullshit to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 04:09 AM
2

Charisma doesn't really exist, its a social construct/perception. A handsome man who is quiet may be perceived as brooding and mysterious. An ugly man who is quiet may be perceived as creepy and up to something. People make most of their beliefs about a person within seconds of meeting them, and it is very hard to disabuse them of their initial impressions.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/24 07:20 PM
2

Working out is huge, people that don't lift or who have never lifted have no idea how much it helps you. Most women find muscle on a man very attractive - especially women who have never dated a muscular guy before. Do squats, bench and deadlifts 5-6 days a week.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/24 07:14 PM
6

Red pill acknowledges that marriage is a bad financial decision for men, it doesn't necessarily discourage it but suggests it is a minefield of potential problems.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/24 06:52 PM
4

Why are you so angry? Who hurt you?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/24 06:48 PM
18

Brevity is the soul of wit, my man. I ain't reading all that shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/24 04:04 AM
7

That's exactly why women don't give good advice to men. It's not that they are evil or deliberately sabotaging, they just don't give a shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/24 11:19 PM
8

If women actually gave good faith advice, men would start listening.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/24 11:01 PM
1

You responded to me, I don't even know what you are talking about now.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/24 08:42 PM
0

No, I am just responding because you were being smarmy about me agreeing with you. I think it is very important for feminist ideology for men to be the victimizers and women to be the victims, as evidenced by the responses from your feminist companions in this thread.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/24 08:36 PM
-1

I don't get ideologically captured like feminists do. I will look at the analysis itself and not my political end goal.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/24 02:41 PM
7

This is a reasonable and balanced take.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/24 06:17 AM
0

My point is proved by the fact that people keep using the word oppression to describe women's circumstances and then use phrases like "bad conditions" or "bad lives" or "shit existences" to describe men's circumstances. You can't argue in good faith with people that operate this way.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/24 06:13 AM
6

A lot of this stems from a serious lack of historical knowledge for some people. It's just sheer ignorance. Any time period more than a 100 years ago was pretty cruel and awful beyond modern comprehension.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/24 06:08 AM
1

When feminists say they were oppressed throughout human history, the obvious implication is that men were not oppressed. Are you denying that? You used the phrase "shit existences" for men but oppression for women, so obviously you have some ideological axe to grind. I would consider being relegated to serfdom and dying in wars for the vast majority of human existence to be pretty bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/24 06:00 AM
-1

Only if you will explain how men were doing wonderfully throughout history.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/24 05:32 AM
-5

The vast majority of human history was brutal and short for everyone. The idea that the bulk of history was men oppressing women and lording over them is feminist fantasy.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/24 05:22 AM
4

I don't give a shit about custody. If I don't have children why would I care about custody when it comes to divorce? No one is talking about custody.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/24 11:08 PM
3

Not sure if you are an attorney, but I am. The fact that your spouse makes similar money to you is no guarantee you will exit the divorce unscathed. It is silly to think "oh we make similar money, so there are no serious financial consequences of a divorce down the road" That is NOT the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/24 10:28 PM
2

It is heavily gendered as far as alimony and spousal support payments go. Judges are human beings with the same biases as everyone else.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/24 10:18 PM
3

A bad divorce can financially set you back 10-20 years on your financial goals. For many people, particularly those struggling financially, this may mean the difference between retiring or working until you die. It is simply not reasonable to expect a man to make that choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/24 09:58 PM
1

You needing something to be true for your ideology is not the same as it actually being true.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/24 06:35 PM

People that spout the "you aren't a true adult until after 25" are most often failure to launch losers who are making excuses for the fact they are behind all of their peers when it comes to career and personal growth. Its funny how the rest of us had no issues getting our educations and careers on track before 25 with our supposedly under-developed brains.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/24 03:25 PM
54

You write as if men broadly hate women, and I don't think that is the case. Take responsibility for your own views. If YOU hate women, then express your views but don't try to lump us all in with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/24 04:44 AM
1

You want a servant who worships you, that is none of those things. I don't doubt you think you are worthy of being an object of worship though.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/24 08:20 PM

Women tell on themselves all the time. Your experience as a woman may not be that of every other woman on the dating landscape.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/24 07:46 PM

They can't/thread Women have the illusion of a ton of options, but most of these women that aren't date worthy and extremely picky will be living single and alone their whole lives with a smattering of short term situationships mixed in. Even now, it's crazy how many women in their 30's I will go on dates with and find out they have never even had a single boyfriend despite 10+ years of actively dating. It is very sad and not a situation I would wish upon any of my female family members.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/24 06:03 PM
-1

That has not been my experience with feminist women - that they are against special treatment or unfairness when it benefits them.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/24 05:15 PM
2

What value do you bring other than being a narcissistic user?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/24 05:13 PM
3

That's why I said reasonable choice. Why bother responding if you aren't going to read the original post?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/24 05:12 PM
18

I agree, truly submissive women are going to be boring generally speaking.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/24 02:45 AM
45

Women think they want to be put on a pedestal, but would find the reality pretty pathetic and couldn't respect a man that did it. Another example of women wanting boiled ice.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/24 02:34 AM
7

I didn't use the word, she did - so I have no clue what that would even entail other than being a simpering servant that does whatever she tells you to do. Obviously I think any woman that wants to be "worshiped" is crazy. I don't think men of prior generations had to deal with potential dating partners demanding to be worshiped.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/24 02:32 AM
16

You could have chosen 100 different words, you chose worship for a very specific reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/24 02:23 AM
25

Worship is something you do for someone above you and you beneath them. What type of narcissistic women want to be worshiped?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/24 02:18 AM

I agree that there is exploitation, these women are financially exploiting socially awkward men with careers.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/24 12:20 AM
30

Here is the real answer: If a woman finds you attractive, you can choose just about any possible (reasonable) choice and start talking to her. If she finds you unattractive, you can have the best possible opening statement/conversation initiator and it will not matter at all and she will reject you regardless.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 11:59 PM
1

That's nonsensical. Even three year olds are affected by policies and voting, does that mean they should be able to vote too? The question for voting is about whether someone can make an informed choice, not whether they are affected by it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 11:56 PM
3

Unattractive men are called creeps because of their behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 11:54 PM
0

They are wasting people's time, they should be upfront about this before even date 1.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 11:40 PM
3

A lot of people have moved the goalposts in this conversation. If a man doesn't want a whore with 50+ sexual partners, he is characterized as a prude that wants a virgin.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 11:39 PM
13

The language being "given a chance" makes it seem like she is doing you a favor. That's what makes that so off-putting.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 08:52 PM
9

People that are asexual shouldn't even be wasting other people's time by being in the dating pool. It's totally obnoxious and they know it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/24 05:26 PM
14

It depends on how left wing, I am totally done with women that hate men.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/24 05:54 AM
1

The wording, the fact that he picked the crazy high number of over 1000, the fact that right after this post he mentions how he had to beat up guys that messed with his female friends. All sounds fake.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/24 10:39 PM
2

I don't ask women out in public at all anymore, I just watch when other men do it and observe the unwarranted hostility they get in return.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/24 09:29 PM
-1

He also talks about the men he has had to beat up to defend his female friends. IDK guy sounds like another reddit liar to me. Why do people do that? I have no idea. It is totally bizarre. I have never seen the appeal in lying to strangers on the internet.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/24 05:28 PM
4

I have seen a friend politely ask a woman out at a bar and it is treated like an attempted sexual assault. Meaning the voice tone of the woman involved goes way up, and the response is charged with fake emotion as if it was almost a traumatic event. Obviously not the same as calling the cops on someone, but there absolutely are mean-spirited women out there that take being asked out as an opportunity to be unnecessarily unkind and engage in humiliation rituals that are pretty shocking to see.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/24 05:27 PM
14

Its honestly mostly women who initiate marriage conversations and want to get married. Most "proposals" are men who have already been asked when marriage is happening multiple times.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/24 05:14 PM
2

You have approached over 1000 women and have NEVER had an issue? If you were going to make up a lie, why not make up one more believable?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/24 05:10 PM
1

You don't owe anyone your friendship just like you don't owe anyone sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/24 02:56 AM
0

No one thinks these people are having sex with their parents. I think you are seriously confused. I am just explaining why people find it off-putting. If you go on dates talking about how you want a man exactly like your Dad, don't be surprised if people get creeped the fuck out.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/24 03:28 AM
0

Trying to compare your dating partners to your parents is extremely strange and gives incest vibes. Its the same reason why being a Momma's boy is such a big ick for most women.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/24 02:26 AM
2

Do you think wealth elevates you in to some higher life form or something above going on to reddit? I can't even imagine the bizarre thought process associated with this thinking.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/24 03:58 PM
0

I make a little over $400k a year, is that too much to be on reddit?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/24 03:56 PM
1

No, your whole logic that people repeating things makes something "not so bad" is ridiculous. As if "not so bad" is what anyone is looking for in a marriage...
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/24 08:42 PM
1

Not anymore than heroin must not be so bad if an addict goes back to it after kicking the habit lmao Some people gravitate towards chaos so they can have something to blame on being miserable.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/24 08:35 PM
0

And I think you are low value for thinking they are low value.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/24 08:14 PM
1

My Father was divorced 8 times, some people make the same bad decision over and over - that doesn't make something a good decision.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/24 08:07 PM
7

Just because something is generally true does not mean you can't find exceptions/thread
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/24 01:55 AM
1

Go gather a convention hall with 500 forty year old virgins. Do you think they will be captains of industry? Socially well regarded and functional people? Use some common sense. Some of you will seriously argue about whether water is wet...
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/24 01:16 AM
-1

That's a non-sequitur. You said "who cares about milestones"
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/24 01:11 AM
0

Depends on the milestone. If its your child, and they aren't walking or talking and they are age 5, maybe you will start to care.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/24 01:07 AM
-2

Who is making you have sex with anyone? What the fuck are you even talking about. Why make this thread if this is such a sensitive subject for you?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/24 12:37 AM
0

I don't know whether you are or not. I said typically. Do you think it would be different if you are still a virgin at 30? 40? At some point missing life mile stones is an indication of something about a person.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/24 12:31 AM
-2

Being a virgin at age 20 may show temperance and discipline and possibly conservatism. Being a virgin at 25+ is typically an indication of someone who is extremely socially awkward - some likely using religion as an excuse for why they are off-putting and awkward and weird. The idea that most adult virgins are virgins for religious reasons is something I am pretty skeptical about. I also think that very few men want or demand virgins, so we are arguing about a minority of a minority of men. Ther…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/24 12:01 AM
1

There are also all of the numerous potential downsides of a bad divorce. No one ever denies that if you have a great marriage, then it seems like a good deal. The problem is how detrimental to your life and well-being a bad divorce can be that it makes it not worth it. The fact that your anecdotal experience with people getting divorced is that they end up "okay" is irrelevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/24 11:51 PM
2

People winning at a game are more likely to think the rules of the game are fair and want to continue playing the game. Its human nature. MGTOW and WGTOW are by default going to be the most undesirable dating candidates.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/24 06:30 PM
3

haha we will have to agree to disagree. I mentioned your age because your strange befuddlement regarding why older generations of men needed women and got married strikes me as someone who has never interacted with older people.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/24 05:53 AM
5

Men used to need women, women used to need men. Many boomer men remark on marrying so a wife can take care of them, it was a different deal back then. It may sound strange to you, but maybe you are just young and haven't interacted with older generations of people where genders were more reliant on each-other?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/24 05:42 AM
9

Works both ways, My Father is 81 and has needed a woman to cook, clean and look after his health for his entire life. Jumps from marriage to marriage out of necessity. Younger men have accepted that younger women won't do anything for them. All of my single professional guy friends cook, clean and look after themselves. Some men and women will marry, and many (even the ones that desire to) won't.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/24 05:35 AM
12

This is totally ahistorical feminist revisionism.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/24 05:22 AM
1

Part of the explanation for this is that it is simply less socially acceptable for a man to be a whiner or complain about his problems. It just isn't considered very masculine or as an admirable trait in a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/24 07:14 PM
4

Why? You could learn about those subjects just borrowing books from the public library.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/24 03:22 AM
1

I have never heard of this expression in my life...
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/24 03:20 AM
5

The vast majority of single mothers absolutely did not want to be single mothers though.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/24 03:17 AM
4

I have noticed this with my friends, a lot of marriageable professional men with good incomes have simply checked out of the relationship/marriage scene entirely.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/24 03:12 AM
2

I guess the rest of us that have all had extremely negative experiences are all just making it up because we are ungrateful children.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/24 02:41 AM
4

It's clear to the rest of us.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/24 10:07 PM
15

That's why they are such bad parents. The majority of boomers are simultaneously extremely selfish while also being cowards in that they were easily pressured in to having children by society. Having children because of social pressure is the worst reason to have children.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/24 12:35 AM
0

Yeah, I guess I am just crazy! lol
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/24 09:04 PM
0

This has just been my personal observation. I have never met a bisexual man who hadn't had experiences with men, but usually its the opposite for bisexual women.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/24 05:36 PM
-1

There absolutely are a ton of women who claim to be bisexual for left wing clout without ever dating or having sex with a woman. It's a very strange phenomenon.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/24 04:52 AM
5

This is more of an opinion with no meaningful argument to debate or discuss. So basically, the same thing wrong with 99% of the posts on this sub...
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/24 06:07 AM
4

That's all great until being a bitch becomes someone's predominant personality trait.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 04:37 AM
0

Some women do though, is that not a thing?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 10:07 PM
1

The amount of women that bring up being murdered on first dates would beg to differ.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 05:31 AM
5

You can say "they are getting a bad deal" but its basically like complaining that the piece of junk you give to the pawn shop isn't worth a million dollars. They can feel however they want. Its basically "you can't fire me, I quit" They don't want men? Fine, and incel men say the same thing about women. Sore losers and sour grapes that want to wring their hands and think about how the other sex must miss them when in reality no one gives a shit that some low value Susan has taken herself out of …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 08:15 PM
2

The bad attitudes, the trauma from past relationships, feminist brainwashing, the cynical worldview, alpha widows, being rushed to marriage conversations due to them feeling they are running out of time. Look at the older women on reddit in this sub-reddit, or in dating over thirty, or in two x, they genuinely hate men yet still want to find one to control and dominate.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 08:08 PM
22

The fact that a woman is attracted to higher status men does not mean she herself is highly desirable, anymore than an ugly man being attracted to super models would make him desirable.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 07:34 PM
1

What is your solution? For everyone who doesn't want kids to just shutup and have kids because reasons?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 07:09 AM
-1

Yes, women good, men evil. Very on brand.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/24 12:03 AM
-1

If he was getting what he wants, he would come back for more. Women never think maybe they are just terrible in bed, men worry about this all the time but I have literally never even seen a woman even consider this as a possibility.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/24 05:58 AM
1

"My looks don't define me" >proceeds to spend over an hour a day on makeup
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/24 05:58 AM
8

The only explanation for some of these statements is that some of these women are sincerely delusional.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/24 04:15 AM
13

You say this as if women are all taking great care of themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/24 04:04 AM
32

Women's preferences are extremely simple to understand. It's "Heads I win, tails you lose" Once you understand that the point isn't consistency or logic, but whatever is to their advantage at a given moment, you will understand women.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 09:57 PM
1

Because your ridiculous assertion that it is not insulting would be proven wrong immediately.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/24 05:19 PM
1

Go tell random women on the street that they seem very masculine and report back your findings. You will find very quickly that it will be taken as insulting.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/24 01:16 AM
2

Romantic love will always be a massive part of life for normal well-adjusted people.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/24 12:48 AM

What never makes sense to me is women will complain about having awful partners that they are with for years. Why are you dating such awful people in the first place? Either these women are ludicrously bad at judging character or they are not being honest regarding the relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/24 09:00 PM

I know stay-at-home wives, and none of them wait on their man hand and foot. If fact, many of them don't even know how to cook, have a maid to clean the house and don't have any kids. If we are talking about some trad-con fairy tale, sure, but I am talking about the real world. Is it a coincidence that they all seem to be lazy as shit? I don't know, maybe the great ones are less visible.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/24 04:56 PM
-8

I like how a man has to be unimpeachable to get mediocrity.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/24 05:02 AM

No, I am just explaining why your logic doesn't make any sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 03:22 AM

You would if your plumber insisted on trying to do your taxes and then got offended when you didn't let them.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 01:05 AM

You don't want your plumber doing your taxes. It is the same principle.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 12:59 AM

How much explosive power do you need for your children? Are you beating them with a shoe daily or something?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 06:41 AM
1

People make irrational decisions all the time. What is this nonsense about it being very rare? Where do you get this idea from? You are deliberately re-defining the word to make your point.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 01:21 AM

If a man has a beautiful wife who is domineering, unkind, and treats him like a human wallet does he still have high self-esteem?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 05:55 AM
1

This is the only guy that would be on an island with 100 woman and not bone. Lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 04:24 AM

I do think its funny how the same types of people that will say you shouldn't ignore the lived experiences of people will try to gaslight us and tell us our lived experiences as men should be ignored.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 04:13 AM
5

There is no honor among thieves, and no loyalty among sugar babies. Those are merely sociopaths that are out for themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 04:11 AM

There are a lot of things that women enjoy as assumptions about themselves merely because they are women. That they are empathetic/emotionally aware That they have a greater degree of personal growth than men (see every woman oriented sub-reddit) That they are kind That they are selfless, considerate, and all around good people by default Honestly, its a wonder they can hear anything with their heads so far up their own ass....
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 03:29 AM

Quiet and peaceful aside from all of the child fucking.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 06:12 AM
2

I assumed we were talking about desirable mates, not people willing to date some destitute loser. If we are factoring in every possible mate, even crack whores, then we all have plenty of options! Yay!
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 12:03 AM
3

In what way? I don't doubt a 50 year old woman can find someone to fuck her if that is all you mean. If an attractive woman with absolutely no means (your words) thinks that she can lasso in a man to provide for her in her golden years she is delusional and missed the boat. I don't doubt you can find delusional women trying to find that man in to their 80's even
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 11:54 PM
1

You are stupid for all sorts of reasons, it seems.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 11:49 PM
0

This would be true if men and women treated wealthy partners identically. Women covet wealthy partners in a way that men simply do not.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 11:47 PM
1

As long as women highly prioritize a man's wealth and career, it will be a large part of a man's sexual market value. Don't like it? Blame women. If you don't mean sexual market value then just say that, again, the wall is not merely your physical looks. If all you mean is physical looks decline for everyone due to aging, then your post is basically water is wet and there is nothing interesting to discuss.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 11:45 PM
10

The wall is a real concept related to declining desirability as women get older. Go to the women dating over forty sub It is full of bitter women upset that they missed the boat on finding a mate. Every thread is dripping with bitterness. The older women in my family all talk about how easy it was to get men's attention when they were younger and how they took it for granted, as well as how much more difficult it has become now that they are older. Men generally don't really gain that dating pow…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 10:11 PM
-1

A lot of people don't understand what the wall is. It is not merely about looks (although that is part of it) It is about your sexual market place value. This falls off a cliff for women as they get older but not really for men because men and women seek different things in a mate. A man making $400,000 a year at 50 is going to be far more desirable to women than a 50 year old woman making $400,000 a year would be to men. It really is interesting how many people on this sub will have very strong…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 09:57 PM
5

If a lion started eating you legs first, would you not be upset because it's natural? What a bizarre concept.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 09:52 PM
9

Yeah I have spoken to women on hinge that wanted provider men and they still didn't want to cook or clean. They just wanted to chill all day I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 09:47 PM
10

Even if you "pick a lane" you may not get what you want. That's the issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 07:45 PM
61

Any criticism of women is equated with hatred of women/thread
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 05:27 AM
3

I think the wedding industry and all adjacent marriage industries are suffering a serious downturn right now, so they are now trying to pivot.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 05:16 AM
16

Women convicted of the exact same crimes get significantly less years in prison than their male counterparts.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 05:03 AM
3

You are either a rapist or they were gay.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 03:07 AM
5

It is possible, but as women get older that is less likely to be the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 02:55 AM
5

Based and fat phobia pilled
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 02:49 AM
7

She didn't settle in the beginning of the journey because no one can see the future and so many women assume their future options will be better than their current options.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 02:49 AM

This is a red herring. No man that complains about dead bedroom is referring to a single instance of their sexual advances being rejected. If anything, most men are too understanding of their partners, which is why when they finally leave its been months/years.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 11:10 PM

Withholding or not, who cares? Why is this a meaningful distinction? If she doesn't want to have sex with you, move on. Men are mentally torturing themselves over why something is occurring instead of just accepting reality. In this instance, men need to take a page out of women's playbook and just find someone else if they aren't getting what they want instead of trying to find out the why.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 11:06 PM
19

To say "online dating has existed for decades" is extremely disingenuous. I am not sure how old you are, but I remember a time when online dating was reviled as extremely embarrassing up until dating apps became common place on smartphones. People would literally rather admit they had genital herpes than to say they used online dating up until the boom from tinder around 2012-2013. This change in the dating landscape is an extremely new phenomenon and we are barely scratching the surface of the …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 10:40 PM
4

Once you understand that these women have zero principles or consistency, dating will make a lot more sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 08:52 PM
-2

Some women will be punished harshly, and some won't. Lots of factors are involved.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/24 06:08 AM
1

It is pretty well documented that people from single father homes due much better than those from single father homes. I think part of the reason why is that deadbeat dads are less likely to take on that responsibility so you are naturally filtering for the more competent parents.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/24 03:28 AM

You are obviously seriously confused at what is being discussed on this sub-reddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/24 12:13 AM

No one is ever talking about reproduction success when referring to 80/20. They are referring to your dating and relationship options. If reproduction success was what anyone ever cared about all you would do is count the number of offspring and there would be no need to even discuss purple pill at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/24 12:10 AM

I am a criminal defense attorney. Many of my clients have 5, 6, 7+ children. These are people that are at the absolute bottom of every conceivable life metric. They have little to no income, no career aspirations, criminal records, little to no respect from society at large, and not to mention mental illnesses and alcohol/drug addictions. The idea that having children is evidence that you are doing well in any metric at all is totally absurd.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/24 12:06 AM
1

This would be like saying prostitution is beta bucks, that doesn't make any sense. The whole point of beta bucks is a man is not fully appreciating/aware of the fact that a woman is with him for financial stability.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 10:43 PM
20

Why can't you just call them misogynistic? Am I missing something? Its funny because using the term incel as an insult basically reinforces the idea that if a man gets laid then by definition he is not a bad person. One would think that would be the opposite of what women would want to suggest.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 10:29 PM
3

Except for all of the self-reportedly bi women that have never even kissed another woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 10:07 PM

The most red pill statements I have ever heard in real life have been from thirty-something women I know and their frustrations related to dating (typically after leaving long term relationships)
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 05:41 AM

I think the jury is very much still out on whether trans people are having a positive experience post transition.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 05:38 AM
4

Women get rejected all the time when men refuse to give them relationships. Obviously if a woman's goal is merely to have sex she will have a low rate of rejection. Putting out signals is not the same as asking a man out and having sex with a man is not the same as being able to have a relationship with a man. It only seems confusing to people if they think men and women want the exact same things.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 11:23 PM
17

This is somewhat true, but a lot of people underestimate how terrified women are of anything that even resembles a rejection.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 07:18 PM
3

I think the closest male equivalent would be a married man with a secret/separate bank account. I really can never imagine women tolerating being treated the way they want to treat men.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 05:52 AM
1

So would you have a go bag like this? Its wild how many woman don't understand why this would be a relationship ender for any man with a shred of self-esteem.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 05:10 AM
3

You should just be aware that there are men out there that she absolutely would not leave if they said outrageous things. That is part of the problem of modern dating. Different men will be held to different standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/24 06:38 AM
-4

Women have longer average lifespans because 99 percent of work place deaths are men.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/24 10:53 PM

Longevity and ability to heal? Someone is confusing race selection in an RPG with gender differences, lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/24 10:40 PM
2

Blue pills may cause mental breakdown when mixed with divorce. Consult your doctor to see if blue pill is right for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/24 04:23 AM
0

You wouldn't be able to attract Elon Musk whether you found him attractive or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/24 04:15 AM
8

Why should they seek your approval?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/24 11:09 PM
1

She is hugely successful and every one person criticizing her is met with a hundred people defending her. You are delusional.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 04:42 AM
1

It is a way to mimic male behavior. Women find men's disgust at promiscuous women to be irritating, so they pretend they have the same disgust - but even the women that truly do have some aversion to it do not have it in the same way men do.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 10:53 PM
3

weak troll
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 10:50 PM
0

Are you aware that Obama actually increased the amount of drone strikes the United States had compared to the Bush administration by ten fold?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/24 07:20 PM
1

I am not sure whataboutism is a good rationale for killing civilians.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/24 01:46 AM
3

Women care quite a bit about a man's finances, This is extremely well documented.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/24 12:15 AM
1

Did he cry for all the people he blew up in drone strikes?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/24 09:56 PM

I also choose this man's aunt and niece pair.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/24 04:43 AM
4

The number one reason for divorce is arguments over finances and a marriage where a woman earns significantly more than a man is more more likely to end in divorce.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/24 03:45 AM
4

Rules for thee and not for me. If a woman is rich, and gets a prenup: Yaaaaaaas Queen! If a man gets a prenup: He is toxic and doesn't have faith in your relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/24 03:42 AM
1

It is possible to do everything right and still fail. That's life.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/24 02:51 AM
6

Red pill doesn't even advise you get married and states that it is disadvantageous at best.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 12:23 AM
11

It sounds like you would be better suited by no longer wearing makeup to dates. It saves you money, and you don't like the types of people makeup attracts. So what is the issue?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/24 12:23 AM
1

That's a cartoonishly silly view of people you disagree with. If you are like 18 or 19 that's understandable, but if you are north of 25 that is just sad.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 11:23 PM
34

When women make more than their partner, likelihood of divorce goes way up. I don't even meet very many women in real life that say they would be cool with a man making less money than them. That's reddit fantasy land nonsense.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/24 05:02 AM
4

Any man that looks to women for empathy is a fool. You are certainly right there!
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/24 06:03 PM
0

All fat people aren't unhealthy. Therefore, obesity isn't a sign of poor health. That is your irrational thinking. The fact that you can point to an exception does not disprove a general rule. Beauty is a general sign/indicator of health, it does not guarantee it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/24 05:44 AM

I didn't claim health causes you to be beautiful. You aren't intelligent enough to have this discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/24 05:31 AM
-3

Why is causation necessary, exactly? Health is a necessary condition for beauty, it is not a sufficient one by itself. One of the most frustrating things about this sub is someone will say something that is generally true and then someone else will chirp up with an exception and act like they made an intelligent point.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/24 05:26 AM
0

A well aged and delicious copium.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/24 05:18 AM
4

Beauty is a sign of health and good genetics. So there are a lot of confounding variables at play but the things we value in beauty cross-culturally (proportionality, free from defects, symmetry) are going to be indicators that smarter, more confident and healthier people will have. The dumbest among us are also generally the ugliest and that's not really a coincidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/24 05:12 AM
6

It’s really wild that many women (who have never dated women) will tell men (that have been on hundreds of dates with women) that they are wrong about women wanting to be paid for and gaslight men like this.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/24 07:12 PM
4

Sounds like there is no free lunch then. Glad you finally got it!
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/24 07:08 PM
3

I know several men who diligently save their income only for their wives to spend it all on dumb shit. Crazy.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/24 06:32 PM
4

You can want whatever you want, that doesn't mean you can change reality. Those are the things women value, so even if you disagree with their values it is just reality. This is sort of like when people say if you don't like your country just move out. Just because you live under a certain system doesn't mean you accept everything about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/24 06:30 PM
10

Therapists as a profession I now avoid in dating after having extremely negative dating experiences with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/24 06:28 PM
6

If your friends constantly expected these free lunches from you, how would you feel? That is the meaning of the expression.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/24 06:23 PM
1

Okay Ben Shapiro
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/24 04:43 AM
1

I feel like you are really missing the point of the question.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/24 03:54 AM
1

I don’t think anyone would think it’s arousing. That isn’t the question.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/24 01:14 AM
0

I think owe is the correct language because it implies obligation, which is what it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/24 01:08 AM
3

He is going through a divorce after he was just saying on whatever podcast how his marriage is really strong and he expected it to last forever. Not even to mention the fact that he is an absentee father.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 10:14 PM
4

It is pretty funny though when you consider he was on podcasts confidently giving relationship and dating advice only months before this.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 10:10 PM
-1

I don’t know who you are arguing with.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 09:26 PM
0

Because it is the commonly held belief now that a wife owes you absolutely nothing and basically if you are a man that disagrees you are told you can eat shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 08:46 PM
-2

No one is saying that. The question is whether an obligation exists at all. If you can’t engage with the question honestly then don’t bother.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 07:06 PM
-1

It’s absolutely wild that this is a hot take. The vast majority of women would deny you even owe your husband sex at all and that’s crazy.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 07:05 PM
0

Then don’t live with a man? No one is making you.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 07:02 PM
-2

That’s why I am not getting married.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 06:58 PM
1

I don’t think you know what the word obligation means.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 05:59 PM
0

Obligations in marriage are enforced all the time…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 05:48 PM
2

The fact that someone refuses to perform an obligation does not mean they don't have an obligation. Whether you have the physical ability to refuse something is not what we are discussing.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 05:41 PM
3

Obviously there are problems in the relationship if sex is an issue, but that isn't really the question. The question is whether or not your wife or husband has any obligation to have sex with you?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 05:40 PM
3

If you genuinely believe that a husband does not have moral obligation to defend his wife from physical violence, there is something wrong with you or you are more likely just trolling.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 05:36 PM
6

A woman might expect to have her husband defend her from an attacker, but I guess if he cowardly runs away and lets her get beaten its okay as well because she is not entitled to that.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 05:33 PM
1

There used to be a general expectation that a wife would cook or clean for you, now its "That's not right, don't expect a woman to cook or clean for you" There used to be a general expectation that a wife might cater to her husband or rub his back, now its "don't expect your wife to do those things for you" Now more than ever, I am even seeing this idea commonly expressed that your wife is not in any way obligated to have sex with you if they don't feel like it. Even if they don't want to ever a…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 05:27 PM
1

Ah yeah that makes sense
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/24 12:38 AM
3

Your conclusion was that they are both unnatural, it seems like you are missing a paragraph or something.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/24 12:37 AM
8

Well they both aren't natural, and neither is any technology we have at our disposal or the dopamine rush that people get from video-games or social media.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/24 12:34 AM
2

You don't think anyone ever is content being single?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/24 12:32 AM
-1

Wait what? Men are responsible for the sky high lesbian divorce rate? How is it possible to be this delusional? Can one learn this power?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/24 12:28 AM
8

Men and women both can have overwhelming desires to find a partner even if they are bitter/cynical about dating. I think people basically view it as hoping to find a gem among the dumpster fire of modern dating.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/24 12:24 AM
2

Obviously it’s not for men, but you pivoted from being incredulous that such subs exist to the purpose of the sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/24 10:29 PM
8

Two x chromosomes and some of the other bigger ones
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/24 06:41 PM
7

On female sub-reddits you can't even have the dissenting voice. You are simply banned at first comment. In fact, I remember being preemptively banned from several women oritented sub-reddits simply for posting in one of their listed unapproved sub-reddits.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/24 06:36 PM
27

I knew an attorney that would comment on how small her boyfriend's dick was and how much of a loser he was (he also worked at the same place). They ended up getting married! lol
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/24 02:49 AM
3

It's just delusional thinking to justify their bad behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/24 04:09 AM
4

If enough time passes, these robosexuals will become a protected class. Imagining getting fired from your job 30 years from now because you make an insensitive comment about robosexuals. The next hundred years are going to be pretty crazy!
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/24 11:08 PM
4

It isn't really fake, it is their responsibility though. That was my point. If a woman can't orgasm from penetrative sex then they need to discuss that. Obviously if someone finds it difficult to orgasm then increasing hookup culture would not help with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/24 10:28 PM
7

My father was divorced 8 times. I got red pilled before red pill was even a concept. Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/24 10:23 PM
2

Not sure what circles you travel in, but the vast majority of women I have encountered still want to be married. It isn't just desirable, some of them want a wedding more badly than anything in their life once their career goals have been cemented.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/24 10:22 PM
8

It is fake in the way the orgasm gap is fake. There is some truth to it, but a big part of it is their responsibility. If you aren't going to be in a relationship, you need to foster familial relationships and platonic friendships. If you refuse to do that, you can't complain about loneliness whether they are men or women.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/24 10:19 PM
6

The only ones I have ever seen even filed with female perpetrators involve children. Charges in my jurisdiction could be presented to prosecutors, but they then made filing decisions before those charges are brought to court. So charges the State didn't think they could prove or otherwise the prosecutor did not want filed could be rejected so no filing occurs. I don't doubt some may have existed, but I didn't encounter them.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/24 07:01 AM
5

I think by both male and female prosecutors, but I did have some experience observing very sexist women that were not sympathetic to male domestic violence victims either. I also remember when I would work intake desk (where you take charges from officers) and officers especially did not take same sex relationship violence seriously.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/24 06:46 AM
9

Its just sexism. Men and women that do not perceive men as being worthy of protection in the same way women are. I don't think you can really blame women though as men are just as guilty of it if not more so. You can however blame people that bury their heads in the sand and deny this bias exists.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/24 05:06 AM
7

When I was a prosecutor, it was very obvious and plain to see that sexual assault against men was not treated as seriously.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/24 05:04 AM
3

If you only care about someone based on what they can do for you, you didn't care about them anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/24 03:57 AM
4

Good for you, man.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/24 03:56 AM
2

Basically the same thing as "all women are whores". Yadda Yadda Yadda, I've been hurt etc. All of the "men are evil" and "women are evil" people should just date each-other.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/24 03:50 AM
1

You are just as brain washed in your views about men as the men you complain about and their views about women. It would be funny if it wasn't sad.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/24 03:32 AM
4

Hey dumbass, you asked me why. Don’t ask if you don’t want the answer.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/24 06:09 PM
4

Because I make about 350,000 a year My options for dating would be extremely limited if I only dated women who made more than me. It may be “risk averse” but its stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/24 06:02 PM
6

If I only dated women who made as much money as me or more, I would only be able to do date like one percent of women. That doesn’t make any sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/24 05:49 PM
13

When lifetime alimony was banned in Florida recently, tons of women came out to protest. Women know this system advantages them and so that’s why they make light of the risk involved and actively protest potential changes in the law to make it more equitable. Women also initiate 80 percent of divorces, yet most marriages are encouraged and pressured by women. Men don’t clamor for marriage, even men that want to get married aren’t nearly as intense in their desire to be married as women. The wedd…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/24 02:25 PM
15

How many women have you dated?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/24 05:16 AM
41

Men are much more risk tolerant than women. If women had to pay 90+ percent of alimony, and were liable to lose half their assets the way men typically do in divorce, no women would get married at all. There would be feminist articles talking about how marriage is a wealth transfer device from women to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/24 04:40 AM
21

Another woman self-reporting the type of men they date 😂 Does Kyle drink monster energy too?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/24 03:35 AM
2

I know multiple men with stay-at-home wives and no kids. I will casually ask them, so does your wife cook a lot? "hmm not really" Oh okay, but I am guessing she cleans the house? "no we share those duties" It really blows my mind, I think it must be a self esteem thing. The idea that you should just be a workhorse for your lazy ass wife makes me feel genuinely bad for these men. I will grant you that if you have a lot of children these numbers get skewed, but more married couples than ever are h…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/24 09:20 PM
108

Women want boiled ice. They want you to be emotionally vulnerable in an extremely specific way that they can admire and feel closer to you for. If your emotional vulnerability falls outside of that extremely narrow (and arbitrarily defined) window, then she will get the ick and lose respect for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/24 09:13 PM
2

In order to determine if women work more hours, you would need to factor in the fact that men work more hours in their jobs. If a man works 60 hours a week, and a woman works 30 hours a week, should they do an equal amount of hours of chores at home? How is this not obvious? What it really boils down to, is women simply want the better end of the deal. Fine. Then just say that and quit arguing about equitable distribution. Women do 1/10th the chores of their forebears and whine about it ten time…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/24 05:12 PM
2

That’s true, but kids with who? A woman that was the town whore in her 20’s and now decides that she needs a reliable chump to have kids with? No thanks!
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/24 04:50 PM
3

I don’t even accept that women do more chores or that there is a chore gap, but to even have the discussion women would have to admit that these household chores are not that difficult and are not a full time job. Every woman who has responded to me has skipped right past whether these chores are difficult or not and goes straight to the existence of a chore gap. It is well documented that men work longer hours than women on average, if there is a chore gap, that could explain it. For the last 5…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/24 03:47 PM
4

Women use chores typically as a stand-in for other problems in the relationship. Ironically enough, if you actually did do all the chores like a little bitch a woman would lose respect for you anyway and it could actually doom the relationship if you did more than your fair share of the work to keep the relationship going.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/24 03:49 AM

You are unhinged.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/24 03:46 AM
3

Remind your sisters to not be whores, that is now your job - stranger that I do not know. Do you see how psychotic that sounds?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/24 03:44 AM
9

Good for you? Not sure what you want me to say. If you have emotional shit you are working through go to a therapist.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/24 03:41 AM
2

I am inclined to agree. It is extremely hard to not think about it and feel cynical and distrustful.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/24 03:39 AM
9

What do you want me to do? Call your exes? If you dated dirty ass men covered in crumbs, that's on you.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/24 03:38 AM
4

Its all in your head most likely, or you have gotten more or less desirable in dating. Women were far less interested in me in my early 20's than now. As I have entered my mid 30's women are more interested in me than ever before. We have all heard of the concept of cuffing season, but I don't know if I really believe in that.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/24 03:24 AM
9

Every single male friend I know has a spotless house and employs no maid. This stereotype that men are dirty and that women are naturally hygienic is total bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/24 02:50 AM
21

I am a man who lives alone in my own home, and keeping your home clean and washing clothes is actually really easy. These things were full time jobs before the advent of modern machines, but between dishwashers, washing machines, robot vacuums of all kinds, and all other modern conveniences these jobs are EASY. I work full time and manage these chores extremely easily. Most women I have dated are slobs and their houses have been disorganized messes. Women cook and clean less than ever before so …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/24 02:45 AM
8

Oh for sure, but a confident ugly guy would do better than an insecure ugly guy (all other things being equal)
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/24 06:37 AM
40

Basically, those men have a scarcity mindset, which in turn makes them less attractive to women, which also worsens their dating prospects due to lack of confidence. They believe they are losers, and it is a self-fulfilling prophecy. Women find men who establish boundaries and push back a bit to be more attractive than doormats they can walk all over.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/24 06:15 AM

I think this is probably generally true of racists as well. I think you are on to something, OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/24 05:19 AM

Sour grapes and coping are huge motivators for people's world view if they are unhappy with their lot in life.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/24 04:13 AM
12

I have heard this notion throughout my life that men as a group need to work on themselves and be more sensitive, empathetic, and vulnerable - like women are. The implication of course always being that men are morally inferior to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/24 04:09 AM
5

Username checks out
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/23 04:36 AM

This is an observation that so many people ignore when it comes to statistics! It drives me crazy!
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/23 08:58 PM
6

Yeah, but a woman with such a toxic and cynical outlook towards relationships wouldn't be capable of maintaining a relationship anyway so it is sort of a moot point.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 06:19 AM
3

I was at the Texas Renaissance festival last month and noticed all of the fat ugly people had girlfriends/boyfriends. It was kinda interesting as they all seemed coupled up.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 12:14 AM
5

Kinda silly for the gender that never asks anyone out for fear of rejection to then comment that men don’t take rejection well enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/23 02:42 PM
10

Have you noticed it seems like every woman has a friend group who they describe as super model gorgeous as well? Lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/23 02:35 PM
0

Not sure if it is just in my head or I am not being subjective, but my male 30 something friends look waaaay younger than most 30 something women I know.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/23 06:26 AM
4

If someones feels they have settled for you, that will carry over in to every faucet of the relationship and how they will treat you. The whole point of settling is someone feels they got a raw deal - so their partner will be the one to suffer as a result of that.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/23 06:17 AM
2

Attractiveness is related to environment, nutrition, general health, all sorts of things. Genetics is only one component.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/23 05:38 AM
15

I have seen a dog eat its own shit before, would you like to mimic that animal behavior too? ​ Its funny how people will make appeals to nature and totally ignore the rape, incest, eating your own young, killing sickly young and all the other awful things that happen in nature.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/23 08:23 PM
8

It’s fascinating how the empathy gap between men and women causes both sides to view the other as villains.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 04:36 PM
4

A lot of these relationships with adult students have been criminalized by statute even though they had not been technically illegal in years past.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/12/23 10:52 PM
12

Her name will be permanently associated with this incident, so she will be.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/23 03:28 AM
12

When your testicles weigh 81 pounds
/r/PussyPassDenied20/01/23 09:27 PM
1

If a man is as drunk as a woman, have they raped each other? Or is a woman never morally culpable in this way?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 07:24 PM
6

In Texas, spitting in an officer's face is a 3rd degree felony and 2-10 years
/r/PussyPassDenied05/11/20 02:58 PM
101

Trad-cucks and feminists are two sides of the same coin. They both view men through the utility they add to their lives.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/08/20 03:43 PM
14

Gotta beg for those pussy crumbs
/r/MGTOW06/06/20 06:47 PM
1

This is what it is to be a simp and go BEYOND!
/r/MGTOW06/06/20 06:30 PM
40

So happy for you! Remember: Happy wife, happy life. Also, keep in mind that marriages are a lot of hard work and you can't just throw in the towel every time she cheats on you. Marriages are a lot of effort (for you).
/r/MGTOW06/06/20 06:15 PM
2

I feel that way anytime I buy a new car. First 6 months you go insane trying to keep it pristine.
/r/MGTOW05/06/20 04:40 PM
1

I don't get them at all. Not interested in a bracelet clock I wear all the time.
/r/MGTOW05/06/20 03:11 PM
3

What is with all the watch threads. Can someone explain to me what is going on?
/r/MGTOW05/06/20 01:05 PM
2

Condos usually have worse appreciation rates when compared to houses.
/r/MGTOW05/06/20 02:16 AM
1

Invest in undervalued stocks. Boeing would be a good start.
/r/MGTOW02/06/20 03:51 PM
7

Except finding bigfoot is far more likely.
/r/MGTOW02/06/20 04:55 AM
5

He gets it in the jail while she gets it on the outside.
/r/MGTOW01/06/20 11:48 PM
3

It isn't as crazy high as some people are saying, but the actual ratio is probably closer to 25 simps for every one mgtow
/r/MGTOW29/05/20 09:44 PM
50

A woman who makes 205k a year will be just as hypergamous as a woman who makes 50k a year.
/r/MGTOW29/05/20 03:57 AM
8

She is already doing her part to meet you 1% of the way. Man up and meet her the other 99%
/r/MGTOW26/05/20 12:25 AM
5

Nothing is off limits for someone this depraved. I am willing to bet there is substantial crossover in the cuckold community and pedophilia.
/r/MGTOW24/05/20 07:07 PM
5

The very basic premises of MGTOW are that: 1) Marriage/divorce/child custody laws are heavily skewed in women's favor and they are a very bad deal for men and can seriously negatively impact a man's life. 2) Women are hypergamous in nature, (and on places like FDS they actually revel in this) and this hypergamy commodifies men in to what they can do (typically financially) for women. Therefore, non-toxic relationships are pretty hard to come by. ​ Pretty much everything else is I think somewhat …
/r/MGTOW21/05/20 01:53 PM
5

The issue is that probably 90% or more of MGTOW guys don’t even post in these sorts of forums. When you first learn the nature of relationships and feel taken advantage of as a man, you are really angry and lash out at women. Eventually with MGTOW you get over anger and get to the acceptance stage. Often times I think people in that stage don’t even discuss MGTOW anymore. So basically, a lot of men that you see very angry at women as a whole have a lot of raw emotions and express them here.
/r/MGTOW21/05/20 01:17 PM
9

Sure, just fix child custody laws, alimony laws, martial property laws, hypergamy, and human nature and you are all set.
/r/MGTOW21/05/20 12:32 AM
2

Weird troll
/r/MGTOW20/05/20 10:54 PM
1

You are the only one getting butt-hurt here. Jesus, taking a disagreement so personal...
/r/MGTOW20/05/20 02:00 PM
9

He seemed pretty reasonable. He didn't leave her until the paternity test confirmed it wasn't his.
/r/MGTOW20/05/20 12:21 AM
32

This is one thing I think a lot of MGTOW guys seem to forget. I constantly see threads gloating about the falling marriage rate, but if men are still giving women their money I don't think it really matters that the marriage rate is falling that much.
/r/MGTOW18/05/20 11:59 PM
111

People are trying so hard to "take back" the words simp and cuck. It is hilarious. ​ I predict in the next year or two you will see articles from the woke left like "Simps: the newest branch of progressive left activism" or "Cuck: how a new era of men reclaim their masculinity by licking a strange man's semen off their wive's stomachs".
/r/MGTOW18/05/20 11:48 PM
1

Neither of those views are necessarily widely held under MGTOW, so it is really pointless to argue with them as if they are tenants of MGTOW.
/r/MGTOW18/05/20 01:53 PM
2

MGTOW can welcome them all they want. I have no respect for them.
/r/MGTOW18/05/20 01:18 AM
2

Weird flex, but okay.
/r/MGTOW16/05/20 10:04 PM
11

Look around you, women today will literally be known as whores on onlyfans and don't even care about the social consequences. Women are upending social expectations and obligations far more so than men are. We live in a golden age of whores, single mothers, and just generally rude and unpleasant women that thrive on shirking social trends or social responsibility. Why do you think so many cucks get married, knowing full well the financial risk involved? MGTOW is the exception, not the rule.
/r/MGTOW16/05/20 10:00 PM
5

Up is down, left is right, simps are kings, cucks are Gods. “Real” men lick Chad’s cum from their wive’s vaginas.
/r/MGTOW16/05/20 09:46 PM
2

Tradcon cucks always act like they are on “men’s side”. It reminds me of the meme where the old guy is dressed up as a kid and says “hello, fellow youths”.
/r/MGTOW16/05/20 09:16 PM
10

I agree. Men are extremely adaptable, and I believe that we are biologically wired to conform to social expectations much more so than women. ​ In truth, men that are simps/cucks are men that are responding to external stimuli and believe that what they are doing is merely "not making waves" and is conforming to social obligations/expectations.
/r/MGTOW16/05/20 07:04 PM
38

Do mods get paid? If not, then that seems like a waste of time.
/r/MGTOW15/05/20 08:34 PM
3

While I have no problem with WGTOW, I have noticed that every female movement popping up FEMCEL, PINKPILL, WGTOW, etc. are all derivations of men's movements that don't appear organic in any way. They are all reactionary responses to the male versions that copy all the same language and just flip the genders. Hard to take someone seriously when their idea of a rebuttal is merely mimicking whatever it is you are doing. It makes you wonder, do these women even believe in any of it? Or is it simply…
/r/MGTOW15/05/20 07:48 PM
3

None of my business and not my problem. Best of luck to them.
/r/MGTOW15/05/20 12:57 PM
4

Technically, MGTOW can be whatever you want it to be. There is no correct way necessarily to going your own way. However, in my view, MGTOW originated based on the following: Women date using hypergamy and dual mating strategies. marriage and child custody laws are vastly skewed in favor of women. marriage is a far greater risk to men than it is to women. You could arguably get married and be MGTOW using NAWALT ideology, however it would be a very bad idea. No one could tell you that you "Aren't…
/r/MGTOW15/05/20 04:41 AM
46

The crazy thing is the same women that expect to never spend a dime have the nerve to call others cheap. Totally insane lack of self-awareness. They are cheaper than any man out there.
/r/MGTOW15/05/20 03:32 AM
10

I agree for the most part, but I disagree that motherhood is morally neutral. Most people would agree that women that are terrible mothers are committing an immoral action. Being a good mother is a morally positive action, just like when you fulfill any other duty.
/r/MGTOW15/05/20 01:28 AM
26

Getting married for sex is like buying a movie theater for free popcorn.
/r/MGTOW14/05/20 03:22 AM
39

That's exactly what they are. At least Indian women are honest about what it is going on. You can't feel tricked when it is an entirely commercial enterprise not based on love or romance.
/r/MGTOW14/05/20 03:08 AM
5

Oh snap, a random redditor said they were prosecuted? Oh wait, even your own shit source didn't say that they were charged with assault. lmfao. Jesus, what a mouth breather you are that you thought that was so devastating.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/05/20 12:27 AM
5

Did we watch the same video? The women were the aggressors. I know you want to live in a world where women are put on pedestals and can do no wrong, but those women were absolutely looking for trouble. Highly doubtful they will be charged for assault when all the witnesses were on their side - even defending the poor store clerk. From the video, it looks like they could literally march in half a dozen witnesses at trial in their defense. Obviously you don't know how the criminal justice system w…
/r/PussyPassDenied13/05/20 11:56 PM
5

Just you arguing women should be able to run amok and face no consequences? Nothing else to discuss.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/05/20 11:35 PM
5

You'll get it soon, brah. I am sure of it.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/05/20 11:23 PM
21

Hopefully some woman sees your honorable stance and gives you a crumb of pussy for your efforts.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/05/20 10:54 PM
3

The word asshole too. Guys who are in to anal are persecuted this way.
/r/MGTOW13/05/20 03:56 AM
9

Lots of cucks will probably blow up at some point in their life, as they bottle up all of their rage and disappointment for years. Just like school shooters, they feel emasculated and powerless. ​ The columbine shooters had actual feces thrown at them by their bullies.
/r/MGTOW13/05/20 03:54 AM
1

Fuck her for plagiarizing like 10 different comedians. Fuck Carlos Mencia. Fuck Dane Cook. All these plagiarists aren't even very good comedians. ​ Although I agree with you that some people probably hate her more so, I think part of that is she had been a media darling and shoved down people's throats.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/20 08:27 PM
10

This guy may be some sort of PUA playing the sensitive guy angle. It is so cringey I almost feel like it is some weird dating tactic.
/r/MGTOW12/05/20 08:19 PM
1

Carlos Mencia got as much hate as her (if not more, actually - he even had to start seeing a therapist and had a mental breakdown over it), except it wasn't treated like a national crisis because he is a man. If someone treats a woman with kid gloves just because they are a woman, then obviously they feel women are the inferior sex. Amy Schumer is showered with praise and accolades, and you are accused of being a misogynist if you don't like her. Plenty of men are treated that way, but I doubt y…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/20 08:13 PM
1

Amy Schumer is not exactly the best example of a great female comedian.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/20 07:46 PM
3

I would be more surprised if their discord showed them to be compassionate and considerate human beings.
/r/MGTOW12/05/20 04:27 AM
1

Ayy little Mama lemme holla at you real quick.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/20 03:09 AM
4

Pretty sure most incels would jump at the chance to die but for a crumb of thine pussy. More likely to be MGTOW if some guy doesn't want to help you when you are in need. I have had situations where I have been asked why I didn't help someone, but you are right, if you are saying it just to say it then it's unnecessary. There is absolutely an expectation in our society for men to be protectors of women as a general class - even women they don't know or have a relationship with. It is an extremel…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/20 02:50 AM
3

That is the implication - that for some reason if some goon who doesn't even know you does not intervene when you are in jeopardy it is immoral. Yet would any of these women intervene if the situations were reversed? Highly unlikely.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/20 02:47 AM
1

*blah blah blah* men are disposable meat shields for women Why not protect us and die for us because wahmen?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/20 02:45 AM
7

That argument is totally specious. How many white bankers abandon their children and skip town?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/20 02:17 AM
2

There are courts in the United States that have held men responsible for children produced from semen stolen from a condom. There are also men who have been held responsible for financially supporting another man's kid because he simply didn't contest paternity fast enough. It's a joke.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/20 01:45 AM
4

I mean, I don't really buy in to that paradigm. I do think I am better looking than plenty of guys though. I don't have any issues dating or getting matches on bumble or hinge. Sex is basically free and extremely plentiful. Not exactly a scarce resource. I think being likable is more important than a lot of these gender sub-reddits realize though.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/20 10:36 PM
6

Wait, what? the only people having casual sex are sex workers? Are you a troll?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/20 10:33 PM
6

Don't have to worry about being entitled to something if it is plentiful and cheap.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/20 10:29 PM
7

People who have never lifted in their lives think any man that can bench press more than 80 pounds is on steroids. Its hilarious.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/20 09:54 PM
1

Narcissistic parents can SEEM really pleasant when they meet other people.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/20 10:27 PM
1

Yeah, we will see. It has been good experience for a first job, and I have been there three years so it might be about time to look for greener pastures.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/20 10:14 PM
1

Yeah, I represent the State but may make the shift to defense work at some point.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/20 09:48 PM
1

Criminal law. You?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/20 05:44 AM
18

Body positivity is 100% a woman's grift and anyone trying to argue it is for fat men too is delusional.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/20 11:01 PM
2

I'm an attorney.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/20 10:48 PM
15

Strong and independent when it benefits them, and then victims when it benefits them.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/20 10:37 PM
10

It is a totally manufactured criticism, and i have never met a man grossed out by this.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/20 09:21 PM
1

"WHY SHOULDN'T I USE SEX AS A BARGAINING CHIP?" "WHY DON'T MEN RESPECT ME?!"
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/20 08:52 PM
1

What group of white men is this post addressing? Do they honestly think that more than 1% of white men give a shit about the race of who white women fuck? Because if they do, they are a moron...
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/20 05:34 PM
5

This is that weird cult-like belief that merely having a vagina gives you superhuman intuition.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/20 05:11 PM
0

From reading FDS, it is my understanding that they support cock carousel until you are ready to "level up" - then those same women now arbitrarily decide they are reformed whores and will no longer fuck anything that isn't nailed down. That is why so many people subscribe to FDS just to lurk, it is so full of bizarre contradictions.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/20 05:04 PM
1

I mean, the lion would if the sheep was a consistent source of hilarity to the lion.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/20 08:16 AM
1

Zoomer sex is the man being pegged by the woman and then crying in to his pillow.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/20 07:50 AM
1

So no guy that is in to her would interpret her as being inconsiderate, in such a situation?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/20 07:23 AM
19

All of those mouth breather faces had me laughing out loud.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/20 06:51 AM
1

If a woman doesn't even offer to pay her share usually I assume she is broke. If she isn't broke, then she is inconsiderate.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/20 06:46 AM
1

No one makes women choose bad partners. Take responsibility for your own agency.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/20 06:42 AM
5

So if someone doesn't want a woman who has had an extremely high body county, they just lack confidence?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/20 06:21 AM
24

I have seem women say that on /r/relationshipadvice and totally not see how ridiculous this is.
/r/MGTOW07/05/20 06:32 PM
1

The younger you are when you swallow the redpill, the better your life will be.
/r/MGTOW07/05/20 06:28 PM
3

CRAWLING IN MY SKIN
/r/MGTOW06/05/20 05:15 AM
4

Which is sorta my point. I think you are obviously trying to hold this sub-reddit to a standard you wouldn't hold any other one to because you disagree with the ideas. I think disagreement is fine, but don't be dishonest about it.
/r/MGTOW06/05/20 02:31 AM
3

I mean, if you want to get really reductionist then people are wasting their time in this forum and you are wasting your time by discussing it as well. Obviously you care to some extent or you wouldn't be spending the time and energy responding. If you compare and sub-reddit to the standard of "why are you spending your time on this, when you could do something more productive?" then every sub-reddit would fail that test. I don't think you are asking in good faith because I highly doubt you ask …
/r/MGTOW06/05/20 02:23 AM
0

Why are you using feminist language like safe-space nonsense.
/r/MGTOW06/05/20 02:16 AM
3

Chad fucks, betabux, incel dies
/r/MGTOW02/05/20 11:07 PM
1

Notice the furrowed brows, the eyes looking in to the distance to check for predators. The warrior's mane which is only cut when defeated in battle, and that masculine jaw line. This would be a revered figure in an ancient tribe. Perhaps a bodyguard to the tribe chieftain.
/r/MGTOW30/04/20 09:15 PM
3

Rare cave etching of Cro-Magnon woman, right after discovering fire *circa 45,000 B.C*
/r/MGTOW30/04/20 01:47 PM
17

Is there any bigger cuckening that exists?
/r/MGTOW27/04/20 06:12 PM
2

If liking IPA makes you a cuck, then cuck has literally lost all meaning.
/r/MGTOW25/04/20 02:07 AM
15

Beer is for cucks? I don't get that one
/r/MGTOW24/04/20 12:59 AM
6

MGTOW isn’t an over arching philosophy that says you can’t fuck women. It started mostly criticizing divorce laws and child custody laws. Telling someone they aren’t MGTOW is meaningless because it’s a different ideology for every man.
/r/MGTOW21/04/20 09:22 PM
1

Its surreal.
/r/MGTOW18/04/20 04:29 PM
0

Sounds scary, just let me know.
/r/MGTOW18/04/20 01:08 AM
0

I already have them
/r/MGTOW17/04/20 07:33 PM
0

Sounds good, just let me know.
/r/MGTOW17/04/20 07:17 PM
0

But you said you would drive to me, LMFAOOOOO That's what I thought, bitch. Already making excuses. God, this is too much.
/r/MGTOW17/04/20 07:04 PM
1

Home Depot parking lot 14440 Hillcroft St, Houston, TX 77085 ​ whatever time works for you
/r/MGTOW17/04/20 07:00 PM
0

Drive to Houston, we can set it up.
/r/MGTOW17/04/20 06:53 PM
0

Stay mad, loser. Also, who the fuck would want to live in El Paso?
/r/MGTOW17/04/20 06:46 PM
0

You talk like a little girl, dude. Literally raging online to a total stranger for giving a perspective on marriage laws. Lmfao You are a mouth breather retard. Go eat a bullet, and do the world a favor. I don't give a fuck whether or not you think I am mgtow, retard. You are so mad, and so sad.
/r/MGTOW17/04/20 04:58 PM
2

Go change your tampon, bitch. Hoes mad.
/r/MGTOW17/04/20 04:38 PM
6

I am not even a divorce attorney, you moron. I don’t even practice civil law. I am merely sharing things I know about marital property law. Go fuck yourself you self righteous little bitch. Fuck off with your emotional little outburst. Are you a teenage girl role playing as a man?
/r/MGTOW17/04/20 01:18 PM
6

popular belief here is that the spouse cannot touch anything that was owned before the marriage. In Texas, there is a presumption that all property is community property unless proven otherwise. I am pretty sure most states follow this same rule for separate property. ​ That gun your father gave you when you were 18? You have to PROVE by a preponderance of the evidence that you acquired it before the marriage for it to be separate property. Hope you have some receipt of conveyance your father ga…
/r/MGTOW17/04/20 05:25 AM
24

She isn't high-mileage, she is just rich in life experience. Obviously you aren't man enough to handle her. A real man accepts his wife for all her history and accepts her boyfriend.
/r/MGTOW17/04/20 01:11 AM
5

This man just doesn't know how to handle a thick queen. She ain't a snack, she is the whole damn meal. If you don't accept your wife's hundreds of pounds of weight gain you are a low value man. FACT.
/r/MGTOW16/04/20 04:17 AM
1

Can't even feel bad for him when his simp level is this high.
/r/MGTOW16/04/20 04:04 AM
2

The most fucked up part of this is she is admitting that him getting over his depression and moving on with his life deeply bothers her. So, if she had seen him on the street destitute and miserable looking would she be happy? It kinda sounds like she would. Fucking sociopath.
/r/MGTOW15/04/20 11:09 AM
2

It blows my mind how many married guys will brag about their married blow jobs/sexual favors they acquired by spending their good boy points.
/r/MGTOW15/04/20 11:01 AM
1

“Simp corner” 😂
/r/MGTOW15/04/20 11:00 AM
2

Okay, this made me spit out my drink.
/r/MGTOW14/04/20 05:50 AM
4

Exactly, even putting in the energy necessary to argue with her is a waste.
/r/MGTOW10/04/20 10:46 PM
3

Honestly so much worse than naming your son Sue.
/r/MGTOW10/04/20 05:38 PM
53

"Hey guys, you can call me Vag for short. Nice to meet all of you!"
/r/MGTOW10/04/20 06:47 AM
31

Lmfao. That is so sad.
/r/MGTOW09/04/20 12:54 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter