TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Kernunno Archive

View 0 posts and 84 comments by Kernunno on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Being a soft science doesn't mean you can make shit up. You still need proof. I wish I could say I expected better from an MRA but I really couldn't. Bastions of logic you are not.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 08:54 PM
1

Is this how low the burden of proof is for you guys? That does not prove men are hard-wired to anything. That is a hell of a lot stronger a claim than the evidence implies.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 06:42 PM
1

You made mention of a hard-wired sexual psychology. That is evo psyche and that is unproven.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 02:07 AM
2

I am not calling evolution bullshit I am calling evo psyche bullshit. There is peer reviewed evidence that claims men evolved to sex shame women? I would like to see it.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 01:14 AM
-3

And then everyone who sees it would laugh at you. Hardly anyone could read it since no one puts a fucking paragraph on a billboard. Those that did read it, they'd laugh at you too since it is ranty conspiracy bullshit.
/r/MensRights27/09/14 05:08 PM
8

Weird how feminism is an academic study though isn't it. And how MR is labeled as a hate group. Who cares that the world minus a few extremely conservative groups hates us. It is those feminists who are deluded. We, on the outskirts of society, arguing in the face of evidence, are the reasonable ones.
/r/MensRights27/09/14 05:15 AM
-4

these are based on pretending that the basic hard-wired sexual psychology I mentioned above does not exist It doesn't exist. Evo psyche is bullshit. Hard-wired? Fucking prove it.
/r/MensRights27/09/14 05:03 AM
-9

It is probably because of all of the rape. It tends to put frats in a bad light.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 02:21 AM
1

Tl;dr Since you seem to not care about the academic standards of social sciences, despite MRM being a social movement, I am not going to engage with you on them. Instead here is a taunt. When is a men's rights activist going to give a speech before the UN?
/r/MensRights24/09/14 06:34 PM
1

Those quotes are googlable but that does not make them reputable nor does it make your argument sound. I haven't been moving the goal posts my position has been same since we started: If feminism is wrong prove it. I am still waiting on those sources you have which prove that point. Domestic violence stats don't disprove feminism bud. They don't even challenge it.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 12:00 PM
1

If it isn't true prove it or do you not have follow any standards of rigor yourself? Sorry bud but your little conservative hate group doesn't pose much of a threat to feminist studies.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 11:46 AM
-1

I forgot that all schools of knowledge have to tow to mathematical rigor. I guess that is it. Lets close down all of those schools, fire the professors, pull down those hundreds of thousands of pages off of the shelves. They weren't rigorously proven, what are we to do? People like you make me ashamed to be STEM. You haven't got a fucking clue what other schools of thought are like and yet you need to voice your opinion on them. Your ignorance has been noted. Us STEMlords are regularly laughed a…
/r/MensRights24/09/14 01:09 AM
–

How are you not crushed by the weight of cognitive dissonance? You are sciencegod and yet believe things without strong evidence? You are a poser.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 11:47 PM
1

What did you expect from a conservative think tank?
/r/MensRights23/09/14 03:51 PM
–

Mmm, nothing say human rights quite like parroting the words of a conservative pundit. So progressive. So totally not reactionary.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 03:38 PM
-1

Got any proof? No? Then fuck off you anti intellectual twit. Do you also believe evolution has no place in academia? Fucking conspiracy theorists.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 03:28 PM
-2

You wrote a whole lot of shit but I am not seeing any sources. If you want to disprove the reigning academic narrative you need evidence. No the unsourced opinions of windbags who are funded by a conservative think tank do not count. No you can't explain thing away with your high school understanding of history and evolution. Evidence or gtfo. You accept the opinion of CHS over the SPLC? You are an idiot. Wallow in your dark corner of the internet. It is the only place your bullshit is accepted.…
/r/MensRights22/09/14 06:18 PM
–

Phrenology was disproven by people in universities and laboratories. By people who were well learned and respected in their fields. I'd you want to disprove feminism you need you own academics. Without it you are just conspiracy nuts. by who? By whom* and it is the SPLC who has written about you extensively. You will find little support amongst feminists for people pulling fire alarms and you will find no evidence that the person who pulled it was one.
/r/MensRights22/09/14 03:58 PM
-7

Feminism is the study of that oppression. If you disagree with an entire branch of academia I think you are the one who isn't being rational. Yours is the hate screed. You are the one labeled a hate movement and you are the one with no place in universities.
/r/MensRights22/09/14 01:06 PM
-8

That is the same thing.
/r/MensRights22/09/14 11:46 AM
2

Can you feel the human rights here tonight?
/r/MensRights22/09/14 11:35 AM
1

No my friend you are the one who is on the side of the right. Your movement, like most hate movements is reactionary. You see women taking back those rights that men have keep from them for centuries and you are angry. Take a look through history. You have lost. The side of progress always wins in the end.
/r/MensRights21/09/14 07:24 PM
1

I wish the people of Men's Rights would read that quote.
/r/MensRights21/09/14 03:37 PM
1

White righters feel much the same way as you. They are just as wrong. I am not a man hating feminist. I'm one with enough empathy to come down here and engage with you people in hope some of you might see. You complain that feminists are taking control of everything, that your wikipedia page is biased against you, that you really aren't like Elliot Rogers or the Red Pill and that you are not a misogynistic hate group. The world isn't out to get you. You are just wrong.
/r/MensRights21/09/14 03:26 PM
1

There are plenty of branches of academia with no money to back them up. If you dealt in facts you would see support there.The discrimination is in your head. You are pooh poohed because you are wrong.
/r/MensRights21/09/14 01:08 AM
0

If yours is the side with logic and deductive reasoning why aren't there MRs in universities? Where are the professors of men's studies?
/r/MensRights20/09/14 11:10 PM
-5

Logic lol What are you smoking. All of your leaders are scammers or neo-conservatives. There is a reason you are labeled as a hate group and there are reasons why you aren't accepted in academia. Logic you have not. A logical person wouldn't fall victim to such conspiracy theories.
/r/MensRights20/09/14 10:49 PM
-1

Who would have guessed at the overlap between MRers and conspiracy nuts?
/r/MensRights18/09/14 10:40 PM
1

I'd rather be an asshole than an ignorant, reactionary prat. I mean you seriously believe men are unprivileged? Lol what? Compared to whom? Lizard people?
/r/MensRights16/09/14 11:33 PM
1

Apex fallacy! No wait, nadir fallacy?
/r/MensRights16/09/14 11:01 PM
-3

Rigorous standards which value fact over conjecture?
/r/MensRights16/09/14 04:23 PM
1

It is funny how much the the most privileged class in America whines about being underprivileged. Poor poor white men.
/r/MensRights16/09/14 03:07 PM
2

She won't rest until feminists control gaming ...and everything else they can get their totalitarian hands on. This isn't unique to feminists, all lizard people are like this.
/r/MensRights15/09/14 12:54 PM
0

lol @ you comparing your plight to that of black people in the Old South. You are not oppressed because we aren't letting you beat women until they are unconscious in elevators.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 05:04 AM
0

The man was slapped, the woman walked away, the man followed her and knocked he out. Ray was in no danger, he had no right to retaliate in this manner. People have a right to defend themselves, the operative word is defend. Following someone who slapped you and beating them up in the privacy of an elevator is not defending one's self. It is assault. The victim is the one who was actually injured. That is the one unconscious, by the way, case you are too daft to figure out which one of them was a…
/r/MensRights13/09/14 08:43 PM
-6

It's not uncommon for people with power to pretend to be the under dog Wow this subreddit makes so much mor sense now.
/r/MensRights13/09/14 04:04 AM
0

Sorry my friend but the victim is the one on the floor, unconscious not the one whose cheek smarts a bit. You would think this would be obvious but apparently not to pigman.
/r/MensRights13/09/14 03:32 AM
-1

From a slap? Oh well then he was well within his rights to almost kill her.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 11:39 AM
1

Then explain the women behaving badly tag.
/r/MensRights07/09/14 05:26 PM
5

It is weird how they are respected in academia and you guys are actually a labeled as a hate group.
/r/MensRights05/09/14 01:11 AM
2

Her preaching pseudo scientific nonsense without any academic sources to back it up hurts your movement. The fact that her drivel runs contrary to what actually academics say hurts your movement. You are letting a conspiracy nut be the spokesperson for your movement.
/r/MensRights01/09/14 09:44 PM
-5

Yeah, it might be fun to go through life with none at all.
/r/MensRights01/09/14 03:21 PM
-7

I know right. If not for her who else would so thoroughly discredit the men's right movement? If not for her, what uneducated know-nothing would give men's rights all of this misinformed and hateful bullshit to latch onto?
/r/MensRights01/09/14 03:10 PM
4

Any rational person would notice the huge overlap between mrm and trp's ideologies and members.
/r/MensRights27/08/14 01:10 PM
3

It really shows how fucked up you guys are when you think of child support as punitive.
/r/MensRights25/08/14 01:28 AM
–

Sure I suppose you could if you had the world's worst lawyer and lived in a fantasy world.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 10:37 PM
-1

You don't lose half of your life savings in divorce, you split your shared assets. If you only want to marry women who make so much less than you that you are essentially the only source of income in the family that is your prerogative.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 09:50 PM
0

Please demonstrate to me how the above claim that he is just doing this to get his cock sucked is the opposite of mine that he is saying men only do things for women in hopes of getting sex. I don't think you understand the word opposite.
/r/MensRights18/08/14 09:08 PM
0

You just rehashed the same trope. Saying men are just looking for sex is sexist.
/r/MensRights18/08/14 08:49 PM
-6

Do you not see how fucking misandrist your comment is? You have just said that the only reason a man would do something for a women is to sleep with them. Just play right into the men as sex beasts trope why don't you. deserve better than you.
/r/MensRights18/08/14 03:52 PM
-8

Nah man they just don't want hate groups mucking up their sub.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 04:57 PM
3

It is hard to argue that your could be both for free market and anarchy considering one of the fundamental belief of anarchists is that hierarchies need to be destroyed. If you don't intend to destroy the most pervasive hierarchy of them all, class, what kind of anarchist are you?
/r/MensRights13/08/14 09:59 PM
2

Part of it has to do with the methods men and women tend to use to kill themselves. Men are more likely to shoot themselves, jump off of things, and drive into stuff. Women are more likely to cut their wrists and OD. Hospitals can handle bleeding and ODs, but not someone who jumped off of a building.
/r/MensRights12/08/14 08:24 PM
0

Mhmm, it was satire despite him actually believing what he said. Now, am I serious about this? No. Not because it’s wrong. It’s not wrong. From his response to Jezebel's article
/r/MensRights12/08/14 05:07 AM
3

Because feminists have backing in academia.
/r/MensRights11/08/14 01:53 PM
0

and the ones that do aren't in the mind set to be "taught" not to rape. and do you have any evidence to support that? After the "Don't be that guy" ads ran in Vancouver instances of sexual assault decreased significantly. I am not saying it was a direct result of the posters but we have no reason to rule it out.
/r/MensRights10/08/14 08:35 PM
0

Oh I see they are just raping people to get back at feminists.
/r/MensRights10/08/14 01:01 AM
1

You've already been doing that for a long time. Bash a violent bitch month? That somehow became ironic satire when it was put under criticism.
/r/MensRights09/08/14 04:46 PM
-5

Why not teach men not to rape? As evidenced by this thread many of you here do not even know what sort of things classify as rape. Most rapes are committed the victim's friends and family and polls of those rapists find that that often don't think they did anything wrong. People don't understand consent, they need to be reminded what is rape and that it is bad.
/r/MensRights09/08/14 04:34 PM
1

I am sorry that your attorney duped you. I really am. But personal experiences do not necessarily reflect reality. Statistics do, and they are not on your side.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 01:45 AM
-5

Linking a whacked right wing mra ideologue does not help your point. If you are going to make the claim that men are less likely to get custody of their children when the fight maybe you should find some sources yourself. Really. Try and look. You wont find any.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 01:29 AM
-1

Bullshit, prove it. You have a claim, cite some evidence for it. I see mister make the claim that men lose custody battles more frequently than women and have yet to see a shred of evidence.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 01:18 AM
-16

Except men are more likely to get primary custody of their children than women are when they actually fight for it. This is not a problem with the courts, the data does not an anti-male bias there. This is a problem with men not wanting to fight.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 01:54 PM
3

What does it matter? Irony isn't some shield that you get to hide behind. It was a stupid thing to say.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 11:30 AM
-2

Why would she? His arguments are naive. It is clear that he does not understand what she is speaking about at all. Not only that, he is not qualified to speak on these topics.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 02:38 PM
2

they're saying that proponents of men's rights are the ones that dox... Hey, incidentally so does Wikipedia.
/r/MensRights28/07/14 08:46 PM
1

The study this figure is taken from has been proven to be highly unscientific and most likely manipulated A lot of people in this thread making that claim but no one backing it up with evidence.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 12:00 PM
2

I am here because I do care. I am a man and I believe men deserve better. Mrm as it exists now is a farce. Angsty teenagers harassing women and manipulative swindlers lining their pockets is not my idea of activism.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 08:32 PM
–

If that is what you need to tell yourself to dismiss decades of research, by all means. You are entitled to your delusions just stop trying to push them on everyone else. I just hope someday you realize that a logical person would need evidence to dismiss other evidence. Mudslinging does not work. Get studies to support your anti-feminist claims otherwise fuck off you anti-intellectual prat.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 05:24 PM
–

We're more like young Darwinians No sorry, you are misogynistic and reactionary nutjobs. You have made it clear with your misinterpretation of the wage gap that you have not read feminists works. Stop deluding yourself. Feminists are not some shadowy cabal who are trying to take over the world with lies and coercion. They are activists and academics trying to make this a better world and they have mountains of evidence to support their claims. Just because you don't understand what they are talk…
/r/MensRights23/07/14 05:12 PM
-1

The controlled studies I've found report ~1%. Present those. WHO has a more authority then your average redditor. If you want to disprove their claims you need to present a counter argument.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 04:59 PM
-1

Present those studies that debunk it then. Your appeal to common sense isn't very logical. The largest demographics that were getting HIV in the 80s were not men having heterosexual sex.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 04:49 PM
-5

There is compelling evidence that male circumcision reduces the risk of heterosexually acquired HIV infection in men by approximately 60%. That's a bit more significant than infinitesimal.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 05:28 AM
0

The food voucher is so their family can eat while they are recovering from the circumcision which was done to satisfy the fears of some of the men. But ultimately these men were getting circumcised because they wanted to and because they could. If you would have read the article you would see that these men did not feel coerced to do this. It was of their own volition.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 05:09 AM
-8

You are aware that feminist studies are a well established field in academia. Their publications are based in "facts" and logic". Their claims have evidence behind them. Yours is the movement with fuck all evidence supporting it. You are among the young-earthers of the social science world.
/r/MensRights22/07/14 05:23 PM
-7

Woah you mean like all of those studies they have conducted and all of those hundreds of thousands of pages on the shelves of university libraries? But whatever, its no reals only feels in here.
/r/MensRights22/07/14 05:12 PM
0

And take control of the world's banks.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 07:46 AM
1

Lol you sound like a conspiracy nut.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 09:12 PM
-2

Feminists are the only ones fighting against that bud. Patronizing women in courts is well understood to be a system of the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 12:26 AM
1

Surprise surprise feminists are anti-anti-feminists.
/r/MensRights12/07/14 11:17 PM
0

I never said they were. But MRAs are frequently accused of being misogynist. Roger's went on a killing spree after writing a misogynist manifesto. The fact that the head of the movement couldn't tell the difference between the rhetoric a deluded, misogynistic mass-murderer and a predominant MRA is telling.
/r/MensRights12/07/14 08:21 PM
-2

But they both weren't discussing general shit like "There is one true god" or I want to buy ice cream both of their quotes were specifically about gender relations and in a way that were topical to the MHRM. If nuns started saying death to infidels and were regularly accused of being dangerous then comparing their rhetoric with that of an Islamic terrorist, who are well established as being dangerous, would both be appropriate and enlightening.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 07:54 PM
2

That was a dirty trick but in what way did it fail? He entrapped Elam perfectly. His point that Roger's and Molyneux' rhetoric is similar was made very clear.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 07:25 AM
-1

Oh so that is why misters are always so damn combative and have never actually done anything to help men. Thanks!
/r/MensRights09/07/14 02:37 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter